Next Article in Journal
Phase Separation in a Novel Selective Lithium Extraction from Citrate Media with D2EHPA
Previous Article in Journal
Elastocaloric Effect in Aged Single Crystals of Ni54Fe19Ga27 Ferromagnetic Shape Memory Alloy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Glass Forming Ability, Magnetic Properties and Magnetocaloric Effect of the Tb65Ni15Co20 Amorphous Alloy

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Green Fabrication and Surface Technology of Advanced Metal Materials, Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243032, China
2
Wuhu Technology and Innovation Research Institute, Anhui University of Technology, Wuhu 241000, China
3
Institute of Materials, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(9), 1399; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12091399
Submission received: 7 August 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 18 August 2022 / Published: 23 August 2022

Abstract

:
In the paper, Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20, 30) amorphous ribbons were successfully prepared, and the glass-forming ability (GFA) of these ribbons was investigated. Both the Trg and γ of the Tb65Ni35−xCox amorphous ribbons were larger than those of the Tb65Ni35 alloy and reached the maximum when x = 20, indicating that the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous alloy has an optimal GFA. The magnetic properties as well as magnetocaloric effect of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous alloy were studied. The Curie temperature (Tc) of the amorphous alloy was ~79 K and the typical spin-glass-like behavior was found in the alloy. The peak value of magnetic entropy change (−∆Smpeak) for the amorphous alloy was up to 9.47 J kg−1 K−1 under 5 T. The mechanism for the increased Tc and enlarged −∆Smpeak of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous alloy was analyzed.

1. Introduction

With the increasing problems of energy consumption and air pollution, it is very necessary to develop new refrigeration methods to replace the traditional refrigeration technology using freon as a refrigerant. Among these refrigeration technologies, the magnetic refrigeration (MR) method, which is based on the magnetocaloric effect (MCE), has attracted more interest over the past several decades [1,2]. Compared with traditional vapor compression cycle refrigeration technology, MR possesses the advantages of high efficiency (as high as 30–60%, but the traditional refrigeration efficiency is only 5–10%), free of greenhouse gas and more compactness due to the use of solid refrigerant [1,2,3,4,5]. The performance of a magnetic refrigeration equipment fundamentally depends on the MCE of its refrigerant; thus, it is significant to choose appropriate refrigeration materials.
At present, the magnetic materials that exhibit MCE can be divided into two categories: (1) Crystalline compounds undergoing a first-order magnetic phase transition (FOMPT) usually show ultra-high magnetic entropy change peak (−∆Smpeak), but this ultra-high −∆Smpeak only exists within a very narrow temperature range, such as Gd-Si-Ge-, La-Fe-Si- and Ni-Mn-based alloys [6,7,8,9,10]. (2) The MCE materials undergoing a second-order magnetic phase transition (SOMPT), represented by pure Gd metal and amorphous alloys (AAs), exhibit relatively lower −∆Smpeak than FOMPT materials [11,12,13,14]. However, the magnetic entropy change (−∆Sm) curves of the SOMPT MCE materials are broader, which means they can operate in a wide temperature range and, thus, leads to a much larger refrigeration capacity. Therein, AAs can be formed within a wide compositional range and can easily tune their Curie temperature (Tc) and −∆Smpeak by compositional adjustment [15,16,17]. In addition, compared with the crystalline alloys, AAs also have better mechanical properties, higher corrosion resistance and lower eddy current losses [18,19]. Therefore, amorphous MCE alloys may be more suitable candidates as magnetic refrigerants used in magnetic refrigeration.
Among amorphous MCE alloys, rare earth (RE)-transition metal (TM)-based AAs and TM-based AAs are the main two categories. The TM-based amorphous MCE alloys usually show very low −∆Smpeak (not exceed 4.0 J kg−1 K−1 under 5 T) [3,20,21,22]. Instead, the magnetocaloric effect of the RE-TM-based AAs are quite excellent, especially in Gd-TM-based AAs [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. For example, a −∆Smpeak under 5 T of up to 11.06 J kg−1 K−1 was achieved in a ternary Gd34Ni33Al33 metallic glass [24]; Gd55-60Co15-30Al15-30 AAs exhibited the −∆Smpeak of 8.6~9.6 J kg−1 K−1 under 5 T [25]. In recent reports, other RE-TM-based (such as Nd, Tb and Dy) AAs also showed rather high −∆Smpeak. The −∆Smpeak under 5 T of Nd65Co35 AA reached 7.59 J kg−1 K−1 [26]. The Tb/Dy-TM AAs even showed a −∆Smpeak comparable to those of Gd-based metallic glasses [27,28,29]. Thus, it is important for the application of MR to develop and improve the −∆Smpeak of the RE-TM-based AAs as high as possible.
In previous work, we have systematically investigated the glass-forming ability (GFA) and magnetocaloric properties of the Tb-Ni binary alloys, and a −∆Smpeak under 5 T of 8.7 J kg−1 K−1 was obtained in the Tb65Ni35 alloy, which was the only fully amorphous sample in the binary alloys [30]. Frustratingly, the GFA of the Tb65Ni35 AA was very poor. Therefore, in order to increase the GFA and concurrently further improve the MCE of the Tb65Ni35 AA, the replacement of Ni atom with other TM atoms should be a valid way. In the present work, Co was used in the substitution of Ni to prepare Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20 and 30) amorphous ribbons, and the GFA of the ternary alloys was investigated. The best glass former in the ternary alloys was employed to study its magnetic properties and MCE in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

The Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20, 30) alloy ingots were produced by arc-melting the mixture of Tb, Ni and Co metals (purity > 99.9 at.%) in a high vacuum furnace under the protection of high-purity Ar atmosphere. Each master ingot was remelted in a quartz tube filled with Ar atmosphere and then the melt was injected on a copper wheel with a speed of 30 m/s to fabricate the Tb65Ni35−xCox ribbons. These ribbons with a width of ~3 mm and a uniform thickness of ~40 μm were selected for the structure and performance measurements. A Rigaku D/max-2550 X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation was employed to detect the structural information of the Tb65Ni35−xCox as-spun ribbons. The thermal properties of the glassy sample were achieved from their differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) curves measured on a model 404 C calorimeter produced by NETZSCH Company (Selb, Germany). The GFA of these amorphous ribbons was evaluated according to their thermal parameters and the best glass former was determined to investigate its magnetic properties and MCE. The magnetic measurements of the amorphous ribbon with the best GFA, including magnetization vs. temperature (M-T) curves, hysteresis loops and isothermal magnetization (M-H) curves, were performed on a model 6000 Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) produced by Quantum Design Company (San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The X-ray diffraction results of the Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20, 30) as-spun ribbons are displayed in Figure 1. There were no obviously sharp crystalline peaks and only smoothly broad diffraction diffusion in their XRD patterns, which indicates the typical amorphous characteristic of these ribbons.
Figure 2a shows the DSC curves of Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20, 30) amorphous ribbons. It can be seen that as the temperature rose, a faint upward endothermic peak first appeared, which corresponded to the glass transition behavior of the ribbon, following by downward exothermic crystallization peaks on each curve. This further proves the typical amorphous features of these samples. From their DSC curves and melting curves, we can obtain the temperatures of glass transition (Tg), primary crystallization temperatures (Tx) and liquidus temperatures (Tl) to evaluate the glass-forming ability of the Tb65Ni35-xCox (x = 0, 10, 20, 30) AAs, as listed in Table 1. Two criteria used commonly (i.e., the reduced glass transition temperature (Trg = Tg/Tl) [31] and parameter γ (= Tx/(Tg + Tl)) [32]) can be calculated accordingly. As shown in Figure 2b, both the Trg and γ were larger than those of the Tb65Ni35 amorphous alloy [30], indicating that the replacement of Ni atom with Co atom can dramatically improve the GFA of the Tb65Ni35 binary alloy. In addition, the value of the Trg and γ first increased and then decreased with the increase in Co content and reached the maximum value when x = 20, which implies the best glass former in the Tb65Ni35−xCox ternary alloys was Tb65Ni15Co20.
Figure 3a shows the variation of magnetization with temperature under 0.03 T for the Tb65Ni15Co20 glassy ribbon after two different cooling treatments from room temperature to 10 K, i.e., zero-field-cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC). Obviously, as the temperature decreased, the ZFC and FC M-T curves were almost coincident at first, and until a certain temperature (~64 K), the two curves begin to deviate. The λ-shaped M-T curves usually occur in the spin-glass systems and other spin-glass-like metallic glass [26,28,29,30,33], indicating the typical spin-glass-like behavior of the Tb65Ni15Co20 glassy alloy. The Tc and spin freezing temperature (Tf) were obtained to be ~79 K and ~64 K by derivating the M-T curves of the glassy sample. The increased Tc of the Tb65Ni15Co20 glassy ribbon than the Tb65Ni35 amorphous ribbon (Tc = 64 K) may be closely related to the enhanced 3d-3d interaction between TM atoms because the magnetic moment of Co is larger than that of Ni. Similar to some RE (such as Nd, Tb and Dy)-based metallic glasses [26,27,28,30], the spin-glass-like behavior resulted in large coercivity (Hc) and magnetic hysteresis at low temperatures below Tf. Hence, the hysteresis loops of the Tb65Ni15Co20 AA at 10, 70 and 160 K were measured as illustrated in Figure 3b. The amorphous sample shows hard magnetic with a Hc of 0.624 T at 10 K (well lower than Tf), soft magnetic at 70 K (between Tf and Tc) and paramagnetic at 160 K (well above Tc).
The large coercivity even inhibited the magnetization of the alloy at low temperature and, thus, brought about the abnormal magnetization phenomena. Figure 4 shows the M-H curves of the Tb65Ni15Co20 glassy alloy at various temperatures from 0 to 5 T. At temperatures above Tf, the magnetization of the ribbon increased with the decrease in the temperature. However, the magnetization showed a positive correlation with the temperature under an extreme low magnetic field, when the temperature was below Tf, especially at 10 K, which also implies the spin-glass-like behavior of the Tb65Ni15Co20 glassy sample.
It is known that the abnormal magnetization behavior induced by the inhibition of the coercivity will affect the magnetocaloric properties of the AAs [26,30,34,35]. As such, we obtained the −∆Sm of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon under different magnetic fields and temperatures according to Maxwell’s equation. Figure 5a displays the relationship between −∆Sm and temperature (−∆Sm-T curves) under 1 T, 1.5 T, 2 T, 3 T, 4 T and 5 T for the Tb65Ni15Co20 glassy ribbon. Similar with the situation in the spin-glass-like AAs, the −∆Sm of the sample even decreases to a negative value at the temperatures below 30 K, which implies the irreversible magnetocaloric effect of the Tb65Ni15Co20 glassy alloy. As the temperature rose, the −∆Sm first increased and then decreased to near zero and reached a maximum −∆Sm at the vicinity of Tc. The value of −∆Smpeak for the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon was 2.70 J kg−1 K−1 under 1 T, 3.79 J kg−1 K−1 under 1.5 T, 4.75 J kg−1 K−1 under 2 T, 6.48 J kg−1 K−1 under 3 T, 8.05 J kg−1 K−1 under 4 T and 9.47 J kg−1 K−1 under 5 T. On the other hand, according to the −∆Smpeak under different magnetic fields (H), the ln(−∆Smpeak) vs. ln(H) plots of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon can be constructed, which is proposed by V. Franco [36]. The slope (defined as n) of its linear fitting curve near Tc, as displayed in the inset of Figure 5a, was 0.776 and agreed well with the experimental value in some AAs experiencing SOMPT.
Compared with the binary Tb65Ni35 AA [30], the MCE of the TbNi(Co) glassy alloy was improved obviously by replacing Ni atoms with Co atoms. Figure 5b illustrates the −∆Sm-T curves under 1.5 T and 5 T for the Tb65Ni35 and Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbons. The addition of 20 at.% Co atoms not only increased the −∆Smpeak temperature of the Tb65Ni35 AA, but also made the −∆Smpeak under 1.5 T and 5 T of the Tb65Ni35 glassy alloy enlarge by 15.9% and 8.2%, respectively. The enlarged −∆Smpeak induced by the substitution of Ni atoms with Co atoms was likely due to the additional 3d-3d interaction between Ni and Co atoms [37].
The adiabatic temperature change as a function of temperature (∆Tad-T curves) for the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon under various magnetic fields were estimated from its −∆Sm-T and Cp(T) curve according to:
Δ T ad ( T ,   0 H ) = T C p ( T ) Δ S m ( T ,   0 H )
Figure 6 illustrates the ∆Tad-T curves under 1 T to 5 T of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon, and the inset shows its Cp(T) curve. The maximum ∆Tad of the sample is approximately 1.14 K under 1 T, 2.12 K under 2 T, 2.94 K under 3 T, 3.73 K under 4 T, and 4.47 K under 5 T, all of which are comparable to some crystal magnetic refrigeration materials with a giant MCE [10,38]. Furthermore, the large −∆Smpeak and ∆Tad (9.47 J kg−1 K−1 and 4.47 K under 5 T) of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon are higher than those of most Gd-based MCE AAs [12,24,25,39,40,41], and amorphous alloys possess better mechanical properties and corrosion resistance than intermetallic compounds [42], both of which jointly indicate the application perspective of the amorphous alloy as the magnetic refrigerants in magnetic refrigeration near the liquefaction temperature of nitrogen.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we prepared the Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20, 30) amorphous ribbons by replacing Ni atoms with Co atoms, and the GFA of the ternary alloys was studied. The results show that the addition of Co atoms obviously improves the GFA of the Tb65Ni35 AA, and the Trg as well as γ reach to the maximum value when x = 20, which indicates the best glass former is Tb65Ni15Co20. The magnetic properties and MCE of the Tb65Ni15Co20 glassy ribbon were further investigated. The λ-shaped M-T curves as well as the anomalous M-H curves at low field and low temperature indicate the spin-glass-like behavior of the Tb65Ni15Co20 AA, with a Tf of ~64 K and a Tc of ~79 K. The large coercivity (~0.624 T at 10 K) of the AA results in the irreversible −∆Sm at the temperatures well below Tf. The −∆Smpeak and ∆Tad under 5 T of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon reach to 9.47 J K−1 kg−1 and 4.47 K, both of which were larger than that of most Gd-based AAs, indicating a promising perspective in the application of magnetic refrigeration. Compared with the Tb65Ni35 glassy alloy, the increased Tc and enlarged −∆Smpeak of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon may be closely related to the extra 3d-3d interaction between Ni and Co atoms due to the addition of Co atoms with larger magnetic moment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.L. and L.X.; methodology, D.D.; investigation, Y.H., Q.W. and X.Z.; data curation, Q.W. and X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, W.L., Q.W. and X.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.X.; funding acquisition, L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 51871139 and 52071196) and Key Research & Development plan of Anhui Province (grant numbers: 2022a05020016).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was technically supported by the Center for Advanced Microanalysis of Shanghai University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. de Oliveira, N.A.; von Ranke, P.J. Theoretical aspects of the magnetocaloric effect. Phys. Rep. 2010, 489, 89–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tishin, A.M.; Spichkin, Y.I. The Magnetocaloric Effect and Its Applications; IOP: Bristol, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  3. Franco, V.; Blázquez, J.S.; Ipus, J.J.; Law, J.Y.; Moreno-Ramírez, L.M.; Conde, A. Magnetocaloric effect: From materials research to refrigeration devices. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 93, 112–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A., Jr. Magnetocaloric effect and magnetic refrigeration. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 200, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brück, E. Developments in magnetocaloric refrigeration. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, R381–R391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A., Jr. Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in Gd5(Si2Ge2). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 4494–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, F.X.; Shen, B.G.; Sun, J.R.; Cheng, Z.H.; Rao, G.H.; Zhang, X.X. Influence of negative lattice expansion and metamagnetic transition on magnetic entropy change in the compound LaFe11.4Si1.6. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 3675–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, Z.D.; Wang, D.H.; Zhang, C.L.; Tang, S.L.; Gu, B.X.; Du, Y.W. Large magnetic entropy changes in the Ni45.4Mn41.5In13.1 ferromagnetic shape memory alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 182507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chaudhary, V.; Chen, X.; Ramanujan, R.V. Iron and manganese based magnetocaloric materials for near room temperature thermal management. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 100, 64–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zarkevich, N.A.; Zverev, V.I. Viable Materials with a Giant Magnetocaloric Effect. Crystals 2020, 10, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dankov, S.Y.; Tishin, A.M.; Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A. Magnetic phase transitions and the magnetothermal properties of gadolinium. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, Q.; Zhao, D.Q.; Pan, M.X.; Wang, W.H. Magnetocaloric effect in Gd-based bulk metallic glasses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 081914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Luo, Q.; Wang, W.H. Rare earth based bulk metallic glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2009, 355, 759–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zverev, V.I.; Tishin, A.M.; Kuz’min, M.D. The maximum possible magnetocaloric ∆T effect. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 043907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, C.; Ding, D.; Xia, L.; Chan, K.C. Achieving tailorable magneto-caloric effect in the Gd-Co binary amorphous alloys. AIP Adv. 2016, 6, 035302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yin, H.B.; Law, J.Y.; Huang, Y.Y.; Franco, V.; Shen, H.X.; Jiang, S.D.; Bao, Y.; Sun, J.F. Design of Fe-containing GdTbCoAl high-entropy-metallic-glass composite microwires with tunable Curie temperatures and enhanced cooling efficiency. Mater. Design 2021, 206, 109824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Z.Y.; Tang, Q.; Wang, F.C.; Zhang, H.Y.; Zhou, Y.X.; Xia, A.L.; Li, H.L.; Chen, S.S.; Li, W.H. Tailorable magnetocaloric effect by Fe substitution in Gd-(Co, Fe) amorphous alloy. Intermetallics 2019, 111, 106500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Inoue, A.; Takeuchi, A. Recent development and application products of bulk glassy alloys. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 2243–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, H.X.; Lu, Z.C.; Wang, S.L.; Wu, Y.; Lu, Z.P. Fe-based bulk metallic glasses: Glass formation, fabrication, properties and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 103, 235–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, L.S.; Zhang, J.Z.; Wen, L.; Yu, P.; Xia, L. Outstanding magnetocaloric effect of Fe88−xZr8B4Smx (x=0, 1, 2, 3) amorphous alloys. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 2018, 61, 056121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Q.; Pan, L.L.; Tang, B.Z.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Outstanding magnetocaloric properties at ambient temperature of a Fe88La4Ce3B5 amorphous alloy. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2022, 580, 121394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, X.; Wang, Q.; Pan, L.L.; Ding, D.; Tang, B.Z.; Yu, P.; Yao, J.L.; Xia, L. Effect of Minor Co Substitution for Fe on the Formability and Magnetic and Magnetocaloric Properties of the Amorphous Fe88Ce7B5 Alloy. Metals 2022, 12, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feng, J.Q.; Liu, Y.H.; Sui, J.H.; He, A.N.; Xia, W.X.; Wang, W.H.; Wang, J.Q.; Huo, J.T. Giant refrigerant capacity in Gd-based amorphous/nanocrsytalline composite fibers. Mater. Today Phys. 2021, 21, 100528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Tang, B.Z.; Yu, P.; Xia, L.; Ding, D. Large magnetic entropy change and adiabatic temperature rise of a ternary Gd34Ni33Al33 metallic glass. J. Rare Earth. 2021, 39, 998–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, H.; Zou, M. Magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of ternary Gd–Co–Al bulk metallic glasses. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 4613–4616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Q.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Formability and magnetic properties of the binary Nd-Co amorphous alloys. Metals 2021, 11, 1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; Ding, D.; Li, C.; Xia, L. Compositional dependence of curie temperature and magnetic entropy change in the amorphous Tb-Co ribbons. Materials 2021, 14, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, L.Y.; Tang, B.Z.; Chan, K.C.; Zhao, L.; Tang, M.B.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Formability and magnetic properties of Dy-Co binary amorphous alloys. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 075215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tang, B.Z.; Guo, D.Q.; Xia, L.; Ding, D.; Chan, K.C. Magnetoelastic and magnetocaloric properties of Tb62.5Co37.5 amorphous alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 728, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pan, L.L.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Tang, B.Z.; Yu, P.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Glass formability of the Tb-Ni binary alloys and the magnetic properties of the Tb65Ni35 metallic glass. Intermetallics 2022, 148, 107650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Turnbull, D. Under what conditions can a glass be formed? Contemp. Phys. 1969, 10, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, Z.; Liu, C. A new glass-forming ability criterion for bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 2002, 50, 3501–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Binder, K.; Young, A.P. Spin glasses: Experimental facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1986, 58, 801–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Luo, Q.; Schwarz, B.; Mattern, N.; Eckert, J. Irreversible and reversible magnetic entropy change in a Dy-based bulk metallic glass. Intermetallics 2012, 30, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Luo, Q.; Schwarz, B.; Mattern, N.; Eckert, J. Giant irreversible positive to large reversible negative magnetic entropy change evolution in Tb-based bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 024204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Franco, V.; Blázquez, J.S.; Conde, A. Field dependence of the magnetocaloric effect in materials with a second order phase transition: A master curve for the magnetic entropy change. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 222512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, M.N.; Huang, L.W.; Tang, B.Z.; Ding, D.; Wang, X.; Xia, L. Enhanced Curie temperature and magnetic entropy change of Gd63Ni37 amorphous alloy by Co substitution. Intermetallics 2019, 115, 106614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh, N.K.; Suresh, K.G.; Nigam, A.K.; Malik, S.K.; Coelho, A.A.; Gama, S. Itinerant electron metamagnetism and magnetocaloric effect in RCo2-based Laves phase compounds. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 317, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zheng, Z.G.; Zhong, X.C.; Su, K.P.; Yu, H.Y.; Liu, Z.W.; Zeng, D.C. Magnetic properties and large magnetocaloric effects in amorphous Gd-Al-Fe alloys for magnetic refrigeration. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 2011, 54, 1267–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Du, J.; Zheng, Q.; Li, Y.B.; Zhang, Q.; Li, D.; Zhang, Z.D. Large magnetocaloric effect and enhanced magnetic refrigeration in ternary Gd-based bulk metallic glasses. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 023918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yuan, F.; Du, J.; Shen, B.L. Controllable spin-glass behavior and large magnetocaloric effect in Gd-Ni-Al bulk metallic glasses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 032405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, H.; Gimaev, R.; Kovalev, B.; Kamilov, K.; Zverev, V.; Tishin, A. Review on the materials and devices for magnetic refrigeration in the temperature range of nitrogen and hydrogen liquefaction. Physica B 2019, 558, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20, 30) as-spun ribbons.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20, 30) as-spun ribbons.
Metals 12 01399 g001
Figure 2. (a) DSC curves of the Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20 and 30) amorphous ribbons at a heating rate of 0.333 K/s, and the inset are the melting behaviors; (b) the compositional dependence of Trg and γ for the Tb65Ni35−xCox amorphous ribbons.
Figure 2. (a) DSC curves of the Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20 and 30) amorphous ribbons at a heating rate of 0.333 K/s, and the inset are the melting behaviors; (b) the compositional dependence of Trg and γ for the Tb65Ni35−xCox amorphous ribbons.
Metals 12 01399 g002
Figure 3. (a) FC and ZFC M-T curves of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon under a magnetic field of 0.03 T; (b) the hysteresis loops of the amorphous ribbon measured at 10, 70 and 160 K. (The magnetization can be transformed to be SI unit according to 1 Am2/kg ≈ 120 A/m).
Figure 3. (a) FC and ZFC M-T curves of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon under a magnetic field of 0.03 T; (b) the hysteresis loops of the amorphous ribbon measured at 10, 70 and 160 K. (The magnetization can be transformed to be SI unit according to 1 Am2/kg ≈ 120 A/m).
Metals 12 01399 g003
Figure 4. The isothermal M-H curves of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon measured at various temperatures under a magnetic field of 5 T.
Figure 4. The isothermal M-H curves of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon measured at various temperatures under a magnetic field of 5 T.
Metals 12 01399 g004
Figure 5. (a) The −∆Sm-T curves of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon under different magnetic fields, the inset is the linear fitting of the ln(−∆Smpeak) vs. ln(H) plots; (b) the −∆Sm-T curves of the Tb65Ni35 and Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbons under 1.5 T and 5 T.
Figure 5. (a) The −∆Sm-T curves of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon under different magnetic fields, the inset is the linear fitting of the ln(−∆Smpeak) vs. ln(H) plots; (b) the −∆Sm-T curves of the Tb65Ni35 and Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbons under 1.5 T and 5 T.
Metals 12 01399 g005
Figure 6. The ∆Tad-T curves of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon under different magnetic fields, the inset is the Cp(T) plots.
Figure 6. The ∆Tad-T curves of the Tb65Ni15Co20 amorphous ribbon under different magnetic fields, the inset is the Cp(T) plots.
Metals 12 01399 g006
Table 1. Thermal parameters, Trg and γ of the Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20 and 30) amorphous alloys.
Table 1. Thermal parameters, Trg and γ of the Tb65Ni35−xCox (x = 0, 10, 20 and 30) amorphous alloys.
Tb65Ni35−xCoxTg (K)Tx (K)Tl (K)Trgγ
x = 054857911370.4820.344
x = 1056558210220.5530.367
x = 205665889820.5760.380
x = 305675819870.5740.374
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Glass Forming Ability, Magnetic Properties and Magnetocaloric Effect of the Tb65Ni15Co20 Amorphous Alloy. Metals 2022, 12, 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12091399

AMA Style

Li W, Huang Y, Wang Q, Zhou X, Ding D, Xia L. Glass Forming Ability, Magnetic Properties and Magnetocaloric Effect of the Tb65Ni15Co20 Amorphous Alloy. Metals. 2022; 12(9):1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12091399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Weihuo, Ying Huang, Qiang Wang, Xu Zhou, Ding Ding, and Lei Xia. 2022. "Glass Forming Ability, Magnetic Properties and Magnetocaloric Effect of the Tb65Ni15Co20 Amorphous Alloy" Metals 12, no. 9: 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12091399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop