Next Article in Journal
In Situ Evaluation of the Influence of Interstitial Oxygen on the Elastic Modulus of La2NiO4
Next Article in Special Issue
Fundamental Research on Fluorine-Free Ladle Furnace Slag for Axle Steel of Electric Multiple Unit Vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Subsequent Stress-Induced Martensite Aging on the Viscoelastic Properties of Aged NiTiHf Polycrystals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation on Vanadium Chemistry in Basic-Oxygen-Furnace (BOF) Slags—A First Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phase Equilibria in the System CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 at 1400 °C

1
Key Laboratory for Ecological Metallurgy of Multimetallic Ores, Ministry of Education, Shenyang 110819, China
2
School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(12), 1892; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11121892
Submission received: 27 October 2021 / Revised: 16 November 2021 / Accepted: 20 November 2021 / Published: 24 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Slag Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system is of great significance for the pyrometallurgical utilization of Bayan Obo tailing resources. In the present work, the phase equilibrium of this quaternary system at 1400 °C was determined by a thermodynamic equilibrium experiment. On the basis of the recently determined CaO-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram, some boundary surfaces of primary phase fields of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram were modified; then, the 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase fields of SiO2, CaNb2O6, Ca2Nb2O7, and LaNbO4 was constructed, respectively. On this basis, CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5 pseudo-ternary phase diagrams with w(La2O3) = 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% were determined, respectively. Considering the importance of equilibrium crystallization reaction type, we proposed a new rule named Tangent Line Rule to judge the univariant reaction type in the quaternary phase diagram. By applying Tangent Line Rule and Tangent Plane Rule previously proposed, some univariant and bivariant crystallization reaction types in the CaO-SiO2-La2O3- Nb2O5 phase diagram were determined, respectively. The current work can provide original data for the establishment of a thermodynamic database of Nb-bearing and REE-bearing slag system; the proposed Tangent Line Rule will promote the application of a spatial quaternary phase diagram.

1. Introduction

Bayan Obo deposit in northern China is a famous polymetallic ore deposit in the world. Until now, more than 71 kinds of elements existing in over 170 types of mineral phases have been detected in this deposit [1]. Among these valuable elements, niobium (Nb) and rare earth elements (REE) are two typical elements with huge reserves: the proven reserves of Nb and REE rank second and first in the world, respectively [2]. However, such a considerable amount of mineral reserve did not bring the expected metal production—an important reason is that the coexistence of complex mineral phases makes it difficult to predict the property of slag system at high temperatures [3], which has delayed the development of related processes. Consequently, almost all niobium resources and partial rare earth resources in Bayan Obo mineral can only be discarded into tailings. Over time, the accumulated tailings have not only caused waste of resources, but also brought potential harm to the environment [4]. In order to achieve the separation of Nb and REE elements from these tailing resources, some pyrometallurgical processes have been proposed recently [5,6,7]. Due to the special composition of tailings, CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 slag system has proved to be a basic system in related pyrometallurgical processes. However, the lack of a related phase diagram has restricted the development of related processes.
For a quaternary phase diagram, it is necessary to discuss related representation types. In order to completely represent the real phase equilibrium, there are two types of spatial quaternary phase diagrams [8]: an isothermal tetrahedron phase diagram like Figure 1 and a liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram like Figure 2. The isothermal tetrahedron phase diagram can express almost all the phase equilibrium information at a constant temperature, viz. single-liquid phase region, tie-lines in two-phase region, tie-triangles in three-phase region, and four-phase tetrahedron region [8]. The composition of solid solution phase can also be represented in this form of phase diagram. According to Figure 1, as long as the total composition of a slag is known, the related equilibrium phase relation and phase composition at this temperature can be clearly determined. Using the Lever Rule, we can even calculate the proportion of each equilibrium phase. However, as far as the liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram shown in Figure 2 is concerned, some detailed information at each temperature such as tie-lines, tie-triangles, and tie-tetrahedrons can no longer be expressed—the main purpose of the liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram is to show the liquidus temperature of each composition point in different primary phase fields. Nevertheless, liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram is still an indispensable expression of quaternary system—an important reason is that it is the only way to discuss the equilibrium crystallization reaction type in the phase diagram, which will be described in the following paragraph.
Generally, some solid phase will crystallize from the liquid phase in sequence as temperature falls. When there are more than two kinds of solid phases in equilibrium with the liquid phase, the crystallization reaction type can be quite different: for instance, in A-B binary system, it can be Liquid = A + B, Liquid + A = B, or Liquid + B = A [9]. For quaternary systems, the crystallization reaction type will be more complex because there may be multiple solid phases at the same time, as listed in Table 1. Since the crystallization reaction type can be reflected in the instantaneous change of liquid phase composition as temperature falls, liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram proved to be an effective method to show the crystallization reaction type. Until now, some relevant rules for determining the type of invariant or bivariant reaction have already been proposed [10,11], but the rule for univariant reaction in a quaternary phase diagram is still unknown.
Besides spatial tetrahedral phase diagram, pseudo-ternary phase diagram is also widely used for representing the equilibrium phase relation in quaternary systems. Once isothermal tetrahedron phase diagram or liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram is determined, the pseudo-ternary isothermal section phase diagram or pseudo-ternary liquidus phase diagram can be easily obtained by intercepting these spatial tetrahedron phase diagrams by using different pseudo-ternary planes, respectively. However, it has to be said that since the pseudo-ternary phase diagram can only show a part of the spatial tetrahedral phase diagram, some information will inevitably be discarded—pseudo-ternary isothermal section phase diagram can only show the type of phase region, but cannot show the specific composition of each equilibrium phase (This is because the real equilibrium phase is not located in the pseudo-ternary plane); pseudo-ternary liquidus phase diagram can only show the primary phase field and related liquidus temperature, but cannot be used to discuss the type of crystallization reaction.
No matter what type of phase diagram is used, the related sub-system information is helpful for the construction of the multicomponent phase diagram. Table 2 shows the available studies on the sub-system phase diagrams of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system. In the literature, only the CaO-SiO2 system has experienced complete thermodynamic evaluation, while the experimental phase equilibrium data of Nb or REE containing systems are more or less lacking—in fact, this is the most important reason why these systems have not been thermodynamically assessed at present. The authors’ team has systematically studied the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 quaternary phase diagram in recent years—the results are also listed in Table 2. Previously, most experiments were carried out below 1300 °C to obtain more information about primary phase fields, liquidus surfaces, the invariant reaction type, etc. On this basis, we think it is time to perform experiments above 1300 °C to provide more phase diagram information of this quaternary system now.
The equilibrium experiment is the most scientific method used to study the phase equilibrium of slag systems, which has been successfully applied in many systems [36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. In the present work, the phase equilibrium of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system at 1400 °C with w(La2O3) less than 25% was studied by this method. On the basis of the known phase diagram of sub-ternary systems, the liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 quaternary system with 1400 °C isothermal surfaces were constructed. Then, some pseudo-ternary liquidus phase diagrams of CaO-SiO2-wLa2O3-Nb2O5 systems were obtained. In addition, a new rule named Tangent Line Rule was proposed to discuss the univariant reaction type of quaternary phase diagram. On this basis, some univariant reaction types of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system were judged based on the constructed spatial phase diagram. Besides, some bivariant reaction types corresponding to some modified bivariant surfaces were also discussed based on the Tangent Surface Rule proposed before [11].

2. Experimental Procedure

Powders CaO, SiO2, Nb2O5, and La2O3 with purity 99.99% (provided by the Sinopharm Chemical Regent Co., Ltd. Beijing, China) were used as the raw material of equilibrium experiment. Approximate 1 g sample was placed in the platinum crucible in a MoSi2 furnace (Precondar Co., Ltd, Luoyang, China), and then heated to 1600 °C and kept for 3 h for the sample to achieve homogeneous so that it can achieve equilibrium faster in the subsequent process; after that, the sample was cooled to 1400 °C and kept for 24 h. Then, the sample was quenched in ice-water to remain the phase equilibrium at experimental temperature. The equilibrium experiment was performed in air.
The Electron Probe Micro Analyzer (EPMA, type: JXA-8530F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima-shi, Japan) was then used to identify the phase equilibrium of the sample and measure the composition of each equilibrium phase. The composition of each equilibrium phase was calculated from the average value of six points. XRD (X′ pert PRO type produced by Malvern Panalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) was used to help identify the type of equilibrium phase. Some details of the EPMA and XRD were as follows: EPMA—accelerating voltage = 15 kV, WD = 10.9 mm, beam current = 10 nA, standard samples Ca(CaCO3), Si(SiO2), Nb(Nb), La(LaPO4) from Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, respectively; XRD—scanning range = 5–90 degrees.
There are three standards for whether the equilibrium was confirmed: 1.The crystalline phase was fully developed and there is no poor quenching area in the sample; 2. Six EPMA points were performed for each phase, and these six compositions were almost the same; 3. In the previous work, we found 24 h and 48 h have no obvious effect on the equilibrium state, i.e., 24 h is enough for the current system to achieve equilibrium.

3. Experimental Results

According to the experimental result, five kinds of phase equilibria were determined from 25 samples. Table 3 lists the EPMA composition of each equilibrium phase; Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the typical EPMA micrographs and XRD results, respectively. The details of phase equilibria are as follows.
For the phase equilibrium of “liquid phase+SiO2” shown in Figure 3a, the solid phase SiO2 was more inclined to form a strip shape. Besides, the backscattered composition contrast of SiO2 is almost black because there are no heavy elements in it. Figure 3b shows a typical “liquid phase+LaNbO4”. In some samples, a small amount of Ca and Si elements were detected in the LaNbO4 phase. Figure 3c,d shows the morphology of CaNb2O6 and Ca2Nb2O7 phases. Because the atomic number of Nb is much higher than that of Ca, it is difficult to distinguish CaNb2O6 and Ca2Nb2O7 from each other only by the composition contrast; nevertheless, we could still distinguish them from their EPMA composition. Moreover, XRD analysis can also help verify the identification of CaNb2O6 and Ca2Nb2O7. The obtained composition of liquid phase in the samples was then used to construct the liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system.

4. Phase Diagram of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 System

In the previous work [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], the author determined the primary phase fields of SiO2, CaNb2O6, Ca2Nb2O7, and LaNbO4 in the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram. At that time, the phase equilibrium of the CaO-La2O3-Nb2O5 system was not clear; consequently, some boundary information of bivariant surfaces in the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram was merely speculated rather than accurately determined. In the current work, on the basis of the recently determined phase diagram of the CaO-La2O3-Nb2O5 system [20], these bivariant surfaces were modified. Moreover, the isothermal surface at 1400 °C in the primary phase fields of SiO2, CaNb2O6, Ca2Nb2O7, and LaNbO4 were constructed, respectively. Finally, some pseudo-ternary liquidus phase diagram of CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5 pseudo-ternary system with different w(La2O3) was obtained by intercepting the constructed CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram. For convenience, CaO, SiO2, Nb2O5 and La2O3 were sometimes abbreviated to C, S, N, and L in the following manuscript, respectively.

4.1. Liquidus Tetrahedron Phase Diagram of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 System

Figure 5 shows the modified primary phase fields of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system. The colorful surfaces are bivariant surfaces: LN-S(olive), CN-S(orange), C2N-LN(magenta), C2N-CN(gray), and LN-CN(cyan), respectively; the last three of them have been modified as they are adjacent to the CaO-La2O3-Nb2O5 system, while the other two bivariant surfaces are still the previous results [11].
It can be seen from Figure 5 that, in the low basicity region of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system (w(CaO)/w(SiO2) less than 0.65), there is a wide primary phase field of SiO2. The two boundary lines shown in Figure 6 are the liquidus lines at 1400 °C in the primary phase field of SiO2 in the ternary phase diagrams of CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5 [28] and CaO-SiO2-La2O3 [18], respectively. On this basis, the 1400 °C isothermal surface inside primary phase field of SiO2 of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system was determined. The dash lines are tie-lines in the two-phase region of Liquid+SiO2 at 1400 °C. Then, the bivariant line with liquidus temperature of 1400 °C on the CN-S bivariant surface was obtained, namely the green line in Figure 6. Since the CN-S bivariant surface is the interface between the primary phase fields of CN and S, the obtained CN-S bivariant line can be further used to construct the 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase field of CN.
As shown in Figure 5, with the increase of basicity, the primary phase field of low w(La2O3) region changes from SiO2 to CaNb2O6 and then to Ca2Nb2O7, while that in the high w(La2O3) region changes from SiO2 to LaNbO4. Figure 7 shows the 1400 °C isothermal surfaces in the phase fields of CN (magenta surface) and LN (green surface), respectively. From the isothermal surface of LN, it can be predicted that there will be a wide primary phase field of LN in the high La2O3 content region. On the basis of the 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase field of CN, the 1400 °C bivariant line (green line) on the CN-C2N bivariant surface was obtained and then used to construct the 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase field of C2N, as shown in Figure 8. On the basis of the 1400 °C liquidus line in the primary phase field of C2N in CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5 [28] phase diagram, the 1400 °C red isothermal surface in the primary phase field of C2N in CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram was determined.

4.2. Pseudo-Ternary Liquidus Phase Diagram of CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5 Pseudo-Ternary System

On the basis of the constructed liquidus tetrahedron phase diagrams shown in Figure 5 to Figure 8, some pseudo-ternary liquidus phase diagrams of CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5 pseudo-ternary system with different w(La2O3) were determined, as shown in Figure 9.

5. Univariant and Bivariant Reaction Type of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 System

In this section, some bivariant reaction types of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system were determined according to the Tangent Surface Rule [11]. Then, a Tangent Line Rule that can be used to discuss the univariant reaction type of quaternary phase diagram was proposed and applied to the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system.

5.1. Bivariant Reactions

According to the Tangent Surface Rule, the crystallization reaction type of bivariant surface A-B in a quaternary system can be determined by the relative position of the intersection point of the tangent plane passing through any point on this bivariant surface and corresponding Alkemade line A-B [43]. When the intersection point is inside the Alkemade line A-B, the bivariant reaction type will be eutectic reaction Liquid = A + B; when the intersection point is outside the Alkemade line A-B, the bivariant reaction type will be peritectic reaction Liquid + A = B or Liquid + B = A.
Figure 10 shows the modified primary phase fields of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system. The bivariant surfaces of CN-C2N(gray), CN-LN(cyan), and C2N-CN(magenta) were modified on the basis of the CaO-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram [20]. According to the Tangent Surface Rule, the whole bivariant surfaces of C2N-LN and CN-LN can be determined as eutectic surfaces with crystallization reactions Liquid = C2N + CN and Liquid = CN + LN, respectively. For the C2N-CN bivariant surface, the crystallization reaction type in the yellow region in Figure 10 can be determined as peritectic Liquid + C2N = CN, while in other regions, the reaction type will change to eutectic Liquid = C2N + CN. As for the bivariant surfaces of CN-S and LN-S, since they were not modified, the crystallization reaction types are not different from that previously determined, namely, both of them are determined as eutectic reactions.

5.2. Univariant Reactions

Figure 11 shows a schematic diagram for the Tangent Line Rule in the quaternary system A-B-C-D. The curve EABC-Q-P-EABCD is the univariant line corresponding to Alkemade triangle A-B-C. For the relative position of tangent line of curve EABC-Q-P-EABCD and Alkemade triangle A-B-C, there are three typical positions: points SQ-ABC, SP-Q, and SP-ABCD, which correspond to three kinds of univariant reaction type, viz. Liquid = A + B + C, Liquid + A = B + C, and Liquid+ A + B = C, respectively. The reason why the univariant reaction type can be determined from the relative position is that the related intersection point is the total composition of instantaneous crystallization phases at each univariant temperature. The deduction process is as follows.
EADC-N-M-EABCD is the univariant line corresponding to the Alkemade triangle A-D-C; for any liquid point on this univariant line, the liquid phase will be in equilibrium with three solid phases: A, D, and C. Point SM is the intersection point of the secant line MN and Alkemade triangle A-D-C; point SN is the intersection point of the tangent line (passing through point N) and the Alkemade triangle A-D-C. When a slag sample with total composition at point N achieves equilibrium at temperature TM (the univariant temperature at point M), there will be a four-phase coexistence of LiquidM + A + C + D. The total composition of solid phases A, C, and D be at point SM. When the discussed equilibrium temperature is close to TN, the total composition of the solid phases will change in the direction of SM→SN. Therefore, SN can represent the total composition of instantaneous crystallization phase at TN when the temperature is slightly disturbed to TN + dT (the value of dT is close to infinitesimal). According to the ternary Lever Rule, the reaction type corresponding to the three intersection points can be further determined, respectively, i.e., Liquid = A + B + C, Liquid + A = B + C, and Liquid + A + B = C introduced above.
Figure 12 shows the univariant lines in the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram. According to the proposed Tangent Line Rule, the whole univariant line corresponding to Alkemade triangle CN-LN-S can be determined as eutectic line, i.e., Liquid = CN + LN + S. As for the univariant line corresponding to Alkemade triangle C2N-CN-LN, the univariant reaction type can be quite different depending on its composition change. In the low w(Nb2O5) region, as the related intersection points are outside of the Alkemade triangle C2N-CN-LN (just like any point on curve A-B), the univariant reaction proved to be a quasi-peritectic reaction, namely, Liquid + C2N = LN + CN. In the high w(Nb2O5) region, since the related intersection points become inside the Alkemade triangle C2N-CN-LN (just like any point on curve B-C), the univariant reaction will change to eutectic reaction, namely, Liquid = C2N + CN + LN.

6. Conclusions

In the present work, the phase equilibrium of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system at 1400 °C was experimentally studied. The primary phase fields of CaNb2O6, Ca2Nb2O7, and LaNbO4 were modified; the isothermal surfaces in the primary phase fields of SiO2, CaNb2O6, Ca2Nb2O7, and LaNbO4 at 1400 °C were constructed, respectively. A new rule named Tangent Line Rule was proposed to discuss the univariant reaction type of quaternary phase diagram and applied to the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram. The univariant line of CaNb2O6-SiO2-LaNbO4 proved to be a uniform eutectic line, while the univariant line of Ca2Nb2O7-CaNb2O6-LaNbO4 changed from a quasi-peritectic line to eutectic line with the increase of w(Nb2O5). The bivariant surfaces of CaNb2O6-LaNbO4, CaNb2O6-SiO2, Ca2Nb2O7-LaNbO4, and LaNbO4-SiO2 were always eutectic surfaces, while the bivariant surface of Ca2Nb2O7-CaNb2O6 changed from peritectic surface to eutectic surface with the increase of w(Nb2O5).

Author Contributions

Data curation, C.L. and J.Q.; Formal analysis, C.L., J.Q. and Z.L.; Funding acquisition, C.L. and Z.L.; Investigation, C.L. and J.Q.; Methodology, C.L. and J.Q.; Project administration, C.L. and Z.L.; Software, J.Q. and Z.L.; Writing—original draft, C.L. and J.Q.; Writing—review & editing, J.Q. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 51874082], and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project [grant numbers 2020M680966].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 51874082], and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project [grant numbers 2020M680966].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, C.L.; Li, X.G.; Xu, G.Y. Technology development and industrialization of resources comprehensive utilization of intergrowth and associated ore in Baiyun Obo. Chin. Rare Earths 2015, 36, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, C.S.; Li, M.; Liu, Z.G.; Zhang, D.L.; Gao, K. Present status and new ideas on utilization of Bayan Obo Rare Earth and niobium resource. Chin. Rare Earths 2014, 35, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, S.H.; Yang, Z.F.; Wang, Z.J. Study on Niobium and Rare earth occurrence state in Bayan Obo Tailings. Nonferrous Met. Eng. 2019, 9, 60–66. [Google Scholar]
  4. Guo, W.; Fu, R.Y.; Zhao, R.X.; Zhao, W.J.; Guo, J.Y.; Zhang, J. Distribution characteristic and current situation of soil rare earth contamination in the Bayan Obo mining area and Baotou tailing reservoir in Inner Mongolia. Environ. Sci. 2013, 34, 1895–1900. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, B.; Liu, C.; Li, C.; Jiang, M. Separation and recovery of valuable metals from low-grade REE–Nb–Fe ore. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 150, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, B.; Liu, C.; Li, C.; Jiang, M. A novel approach for recovery of rare earths and niobium from Bayan Obo tailings. Miner. Eng. 2014, 65, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, B.; Fan, Y.; Liu, C.; Ye, Y.; Jiang, M. Reduction Characteristics of Carbon-Containing REE–Nb–Fe Ore Pellets. Metals 2018, 8, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jia, C.K. Multi-Component Phase Diagram, 1st ed.; Metallurgical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2011; pp. 1–282. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, C.L. Phase Diagram and Its Application, 2nd ed.; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2014; pp. 1–452. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, C.J. Phase Rule and Phase Diagram Thermodynamics, 1st ed.; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 1995; pp. 1–160. [Google Scholar]
  11. Qiu, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, D. Liquidus Phase Diagram of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 System with w(La2O3) = 15 to 25 Pct. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2020, 51, 1190–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Eriksson, G.; Wu, P.; Blander, M.; Pelton, A.D. Critical Evaluation and Optimization of the Thermodynamic Properties and Phase Diagrams of the MnO–SiO2 and CaO–SiO2 Systems. Can. Met. Q. 1994, 33, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rankin, G.A. The ternary system CaO-Al2O3-SiO2, with optical study by FE Wright. Am. J. Sci. 1915, 4, 1–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Phillips, B.; Muan, A. Phase Equilibria in the System CaO-Iron Oxide-SiO2, in Air. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1959, 42, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Taylor, J.; Dinsdale, A. Thermodynamic and phase diagram data for the CaO-SiO2 system. Calphad 1990, 14, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. JTewhey, D.; Hess, P.C. Two-phase region in the CaO-SiO2 system-experimental data and thermodynamic analysis. Phys. Chem. Glasses 1979, 20, 41–53. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hageman, V.B.M.; van den Berg, G.J.K.; Janssen, H.J.; Oonk, H.A. A reinvestigation of liquid immiscibility in the SiO2-CaO system. Phys. Chem. Glasses 1986, 27, 100–106. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, C.; Qiu, J. Phase equilibrium relations in the specific region of CaO-SiO2-La2O3 system. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 2090–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barry, T.L.; Stubican, V.S.; Roy, R. Phase Equilibria in the System CaO-Yb2O3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1966, 49, 667–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qiu, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, D.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, M. Phase equilibria in the CaO-La2O3-Nb2O5 system at 1823, 1773, and 1673 K. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2020, 8, 764–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fedorov, N.F.; Melnikova, O.V.; Smorodina, T.P. Solid solutions in CaNb2O6-LaNb3O9 system. Zhurnal Neorg. Khimii 1975, 20, 2188–2191. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fedorov, N.F.; Melnikova, O.V.; Smorodina, T.P. Etude physico chimique de la reaction a haute temperature de Ca2Nb2O7 avec La3NbO7. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol. 1978, 21, 633–636. [Google Scholar]
  23. Frolov, A.M.; Evdokimov, A.A. The isothermal section of CaO-La2O3-Nb2O5 system. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. (Engl. Transl.) 1987, 32, 1771. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pilarek, B.; Pelczarska, A.J.; Szczygieł, I. Phase equilibria in the CaO–Nb2O5 system up to 1600 °C: New experimental results. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 1562–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ibrahim, M.; Bright, N.F.H.; Rowland, J.F. The Binary System CaO-Nb2O5. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1962, 45, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jongejan, A. Phase relationships in the high-lime part of the system CaO-Nb2O5. J. Less Common Met. 1969, 19, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vanderah, T.; Febo, W.; Chan, J.Y.; Roth, R.; Loezos, J.; Rotter, L.; Geyer, R.; Minor, D. Phase Equilibria and Dielectric Behavior in the CaO:Al2O3:Nb2O5 System. J. Solid State Chem. 2000, 155, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jongejan, A.; Wilkins, A. Phase relationships in the high-lime part of the system CaO-Nb2O5-SiO2. J. Less Common Met. 1969, 19, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Savchenko, E.P.; Godina, N.A.; Keler, E.K. Solid-Phase Reactions between Pentoxides of Niobium and Tantalum and Oxides of the Rare-Earth Elements. Chem. High Temp. Mater. 1969, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bondar, I. Rare-earth silicates. Ceram. Int. 1982, 8, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Toropov, N.A.; Bondar, I.A. Silicates of the rare earth elements. Russ. Chem. Bull. 1961, 10, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qiu, J.; Liu, C. Solid Phase Equilibrium Relations in the CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5-La2O3 System at 1273 K. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2018, 49, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qiu, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Z. Phase equilibria in low basicity region of CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5-(5 wt%, 10 wt%, 15 wt%) La2O3 system. J. Rare Earths 2019, 38, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Qiu, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Z. Phase equilibria in medium basicity region of CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5-(5%, 10%, 15%) La2O3 system. Ceram. Int. 2018, 45, 2281–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ibrahim, M.; Bright, N.F.H. The Binary System Nb2O5-SiO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1962, 45, 221–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jang, K.-O.; Ma, X.; Zhu, J.; Xu, H.; Wang, G.; Zhao, B. Phase Equilibria in the System “FeO”–CaO–SiO2–Al2O3–MgO with CaO/SiO2 1.3. ISIJ Int. 2016, 56, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yan, B.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z. Experimental study of phase equilibria in the MgO-SiO2-TiO system. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 3476–3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shi, J.; Chen, M.; Santoso, I.; Sun, L.; Jiang, M.; Taskinen, P.; Jokilaakso, A. 1250°C liquidus for the CaO–MgO–SiO2–Al2O3–TiO2 system in air. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 1545–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, X.; Matsuura, H.; Sohn, I.; Wang, W.; Min, D.J.; Tsukihashi, F. Phase Relationship for the CaO–SiO2–FeO–5 mass%P2O5 System with Oxygen Partial Pressure of 10−8 atm at 1673 and 1623 K. Mater. Trans. 2013, 54, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wang, N.; Huang, W.-J.; Chen, S.-C.; Chen, M. Effect of Oxygen Partial Pressure on Phase Equilibria and Liquidus in CaO-Al2O3-FeOx System. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2012, 19, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wan, X.; Shi, J.; Klemettinen, L.; Chen, M.; Taskinen, P.; Jokilaakso, A. Equilibrium phase relations of CaO–SiO2–TiO2 system at 1400 °C and oxygen partial pressure of 10−10 atm. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 847, 156472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Z.; Sohn, I. Experimental determination of phase equilibria in the CaO-BaO-SiO2-12 mol pct. Al2O3-13 mol pct. MgO system at 1573 K and 1623 K. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 5632–5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Malakhov, D.V. A rigorous proof of the Alkemade theorem. Calphad 2004, 28, 209–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Isothermal tetrahedron phase diagram for quaternary system.
Figure 1. Isothermal tetrahedron phase diagram for quaternary system.
Metals 11 01892 g001
Figure 2. Liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram for quaternary system with liquid region at constant temperature (E1–E4).
Figure 2. Liquidus tetrahedron phase diagram for quaternary system with liquid region at constant temperature (E1–E4).
Metals 11 01892 g002
Figure 3. Typical EPMA micrographs of the samples (a) Liquid phase+SiO2 (Slag No.1) (b) Liquid phase+LaNbO4 (Slag No.16). (c) Liquid phase+CaNb2O6 (Slag No.15) (d) Liquid phase+Ca2Nb2O7 (Slag No.22) (e) Liquid phase+CaNb2O6+Ca2Nb2O7 (Slag No.14).
Figure 3. Typical EPMA micrographs of the samples (a) Liquid phase+SiO2 (Slag No.1) (b) Liquid phase+LaNbO4 (Slag No.16). (c) Liquid phase+CaNb2O6 (Slag No.15) (d) Liquid phase+Ca2Nb2O7 (Slag No.22) (e) Liquid phase+CaNb2O6+Ca2Nb2O7 (Slag No.14).
Metals 11 01892 g003aMetals 11 01892 g003b
Figure 4. Typical XRD results of the samples (a) Liquid phase+CaNb2O6(Slag No.15) (b) Liquid phase+LaNbO4(Slag No.16) (c) Liquid phase+Ca2Nb2O7(Slag No.22).
Figure 4. Typical XRD results of the samples (a) Liquid phase+CaNb2O6(Slag No.15) (b) Liquid phase+LaNbO4(Slag No.16) (c) Liquid phase+Ca2Nb2O7(Slag No.22).
Metals 11 01892 g004aMetals 11 01892 g004b
Figure 5. Primary phase fields of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system.
Figure 5. Primary phase fields of the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system.
Metals 11 01892 g005
Figure 6. 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase field of SiO2.
Figure 6. 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase field of SiO2.
Metals 11 01892 g006
Figure 7. 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase fields of CaNb2O6 and LaNbO4.
Figure 7. 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase fields of CaNb2O6 and LaNbO4.
Metals 11 01892 g007
Figure 8. 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase field of Ca2Nb2O7.
Figure 8. 1400 °C isothermal surface in the primary phase field of Ca2Nb2O7.
Metals 11 01892 g008
Figure 9. Pseudo-ternary liquidus phase diagrams of CaO-SiO2-(5%, 10%, 15%, 20%)La2O3-Nb2O5 system (a) CaO-SiO2-5%La2O3-Nb2O5 (b) CaO-SiO2-10%La2O3-Nb2O5 (c) CaO-SiO2-15%La2O3-Nb2O5 (d) CaO-SiO2-20%La2O3-Nb2O5.
Figure 9. Pseudo-ternary liquidus phase diagrams of CaO-SiO2-(5%, 10%, 15%, 20%)La2O3-Nb2O5 system (a) CaO-SiO2-5%La2O3-Nb2O5 (b) CaO-SiO2-10%La2O3-Nb2O5 (c) CaO-SiO2-15%La2O3-Nb2O5 (d) CaO-SiO2-20%La2O3-Nb2O5.
Metals 11 01892 g009
Figure 10. Schematic diagram for bivariant crystallization reaction type of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram.
Figure 10. Schematic diagram for bivariant crystallization reaction type of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram.
Metals 11 01892 g010
Figure 11. Schematic diagram for the Tangent Line Rule applicable to quaternary phase diagram.
Figure 11. Schematic diagram for the Tangent Line Rule applicable to quaternary phase diagram.
Metals 11 01892 g011
Figure 12. Schematic diagram for univariant crystallization reaction type of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram.
Figure 12. Schematic diagram for univariant crystallization reaction type of CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 phase diagram.
Metals 11 01892 g012
Table 1. Crystallization reaction of quaternary phase diagram.
Table 1. Crystallization reaction of quaternary phase diagram.
Crystallization ReactionFree DegreeTypical Phase EquilibriaRule
Invariant reaction (point)0Liquid phase + A + B + C + DLever Rule [10]
Univariant reaction (line)1Liquid phase + A + B + CUnknown
Bivariant reaction (surface)2Liquid phase + A + BTangent Surface (line) Rule [11]
Table 2. Available studies on the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system and its subsystems.
Table 2. Available studies on the CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 system and its subsystems.
SystemRef No. SystemRef No.
Binary systemCaO-SiO2[12,13,14,15,16,17]Ternary systemCaO-SiO2-La2O3[18]
CaO-La2O3[19]CaO-La2O3-Nb2O5[20,21,22,23]
CaO-Nb2O5[24,25,26,27]CaO-SiO2-Nb2O5[28]
La2O3-Nb2O5[29]La2O3-SiO2-Nb2O5
La2O3-SiO2[30,31]Quaternary systemCaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5[11,32,33,34]
SiO2-Nb2O5[35]
Table 3. Composition of equilibrium phases in the samples, mass%.
Table 3. Composition of equilibrium phases in the samples, mass%.
No.PhaseCaOSiO2Nb2O5La2O3No.PhaseCaOSiO2Nb2O5La2O3
#1Liquid21.27%35.94%37.49%5.30%#14Liquid23.47%12.56%58.40%5.57%
SiO2 100.00% CaNb2O617.39% 82.61%
#2Liquid16.07%19.61%59.07%5.26%Ca2Nb2O723.26% 70.09%5.78%
SiO2 100.00% #15Liquid20.78%14.38%56.22%8.61%
#3Liquid14.99%22.50%52.85%9.66%CaNb2O617.42% 82.58%
SiO2 100.00% #16Liquid11.81%11.19%51.14%25.86%
#4Liquid10.37%17.51%56.52%15.60%LaNbO40.93%1.20%43.40%54.47%
SiO2 100.00% #17Liquid6.45%11.22%49.63%32.70%
#5Liquid8.95%20.71%50.43%19.91%LaNbO4 43.91%56.09%
SiO2 100.00% #18Liquid16.43%11.30%47.47%24.80%
#6Liquid24.38%53.29%6.40%15.93%LaNbO41.63%1.55%42.98%53.84%
SiO2 100.00% #19Liquid15.27%14.71%41.32%28.70%
#7Liquid18.74%38.40%26.42%16.43%LaNbO4 43.48%56.52%
SiO2 100.00% #20Liquid12.55%11.15%50.59%25.70%
#8Liquid35.52%59.49%3.45%1.55%LaNbO41.86%2.40%43.32%52.42%
SiO2 100.00% #21Liquid13.37%14.50%42.92%29.21%
#9Liquid32.35%54.906.85%5.91%LaNbO4 43.81%56.19%
SiO2 100.00% #22Liquid22.87%13.94%50.23%12.96%
#10Liquid24.21%41.97%28.47%5.35%Ca2Nb2O720.95% 70.55%8.49%
SiO2 100.00% #23Liquid28.11%15.61%50.35%5.92%
#11Liquid21.37%38.40%30.14%10.10%Ca2Nb2O723.22% 69.96%6.82%
SiO2 100.00% #24Liquid20.65%12.26%49.62%17.47%
#12Liquid19.48%28.57%46.72%5.23%Ca2Nb2O720.79% 69.32%9.89%
SiO2 100.00% #25Liquid33.71%18.75%39.71%7.84%
#13Liquid22.22%49.06%13.16%15.56%Ca2Nb2O724.61% 70.80%4.59%
SiO2 100.00%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, C.; Qiu, J.; Liu, Z. Phase Equilibria in the System CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 at 1400 °C. Metals 2021, 11, 1892. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11121892

AMA Style

Liu C, Qiu J, Liu Z. Phase Equilibria in the System CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 at 1400 °C. Metals. 2021; 11(12):1892. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11121892

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Chengjun, Jiyu Qiu, and Zhengyue Liu. 2021. "Phase Equilibria in the System CaO-SiO2-La2O3-Nb2O5 at 1400 °C" Metals 11, no. 12: 1892. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11121892

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop