Next Article in Journal
Hot Deformation Behavior of Novel Al-Cu-Y(Er)-Mg-Mn-Zr Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
Powder Metallurgy: A New Open Section in Metals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermoplastic Forming of a Hydrophilic Surface with a Nanostructure Array on Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Y Bulk Metallic Glass

1
College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(10), 1520; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11101520
Submission received: 27 August 2021 / Revised: 17 September 2021 / Accepted: 21 September 2021 / Published: 24 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Superplastic Forming)

Abstract

:
The poor thermoplastic formability of reactive Zr-based bulk metallic glass becomes the main limiting factor for replacing the noble-metal-based and Be-rich bulk metallic glasses in nanostructure fabrication. In our work, a (Zr50.7Cu28Ni9Al12.3)98.5Y1.5 bulk metallic glass with good thermoplastic formability has been developed by alloying, where Y addition enlarges the processing window and decreases the viscous resistance of supercooled liquid caused by the high free volume density. The prepared Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Y bulk metallic glass nanostructure retains the amorphous characteristic and generates the complex oxidization products in the surface layer. The enhanced hydrophilicity of the as-embossed surface follows a Wenzel-impregnating wetting regime, and it can be attributed to the large roughness coefficient induced by the capillary effect. This study provides a low-cost and environmentally friendly bulk metallic glass system to manufacture the nanostructure with a broad prospect in the field of electrocatalysis.

1. Introduction

Bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) are considered potential catalysts because of their good mechanical properties, outstanding stability in corrosive media and relatively high reaction activity that results from their unique metastable microstructures [1,2,3,4]. Thus, BMGs can play an important role in the development of energy conversion and storage technology [5,6]. The fabrication of BMG components with nanostructures, which can significantly increase the high specific surface area, has attracted considerable interest in the fields of fuel cells and electrochemistry to improve catalytic performance [7,8]. At present, the BMG systems usually utilized in the fabrication of nanostructures and electrocatalysis research primarily consist of Pt-based and Pd-based BMGs because of their outstanding thermoplastic formability and oxidation resistance [9,10,11,12]. Some studies on low-cost BMG systems, including Zr-Ti-Cu-Be and Ti-Zr-Be-Fe [13,14], have also been performed to replace noble metal-based BMGs in preparing nanostructures. However, expensive raw materials and mass Be addition, which may cause serious environmental threats, hinder the practical application of the aforementioned BMG systems. Therefore, developing new economical and environmentally friendly BMGs and the corresponding thermoplastic forming (TPF) method is necessary to achieve the fabrication of the BMG nanostructure. To date, few reports are found on hot embossing of reactive BMG (including Zr-Cu-Al, Zr-Cu-Ni-Al or Zr-Co-Al BMG systems) nanostructure arrays with a characteristic size of less than 1 μm.
The main challenges in designing the BMG system suitable for nanostructure fabrication are to enlarge the TPF window, decrease the viscous resistance and optimize the interfacial states of supercooled liquid [15,16]. Many researchers have pointed out that Y addition can not only improve the thermal stability of Zr-based BMG and decrease the viscosity of supercooled liquid but also contribute to the thin oxide layer on the specimen surface [17,18,19]. Following this strategy, Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Y BMG systems can meet the requirements concerning the TPF of nanostructures and are expected to become promising candidates as future electrocatalysis materials. In this paper, the high-aspect-ratio nanopillar array on (Zr50.7Cu28Ni9Al12.3)98.5Y1.5 (ZrY1.5) BMG was prepared under a low-vacuum condition, suggesting that the developed Zr-based BMG with excellent thermoplastic formability can support the need for nanostructure fabrication when reducing the material cost and environmental threat. The phase composition and structural characteristics of the nanopillars, as the main factors determining the catalytic efficiency, were retained after the TPF. In addition, the good wettability of BMG specimens with nanostructure array was obtained, thereby confirming their potential application in the electrocatalytic field.

2. Materials and Methods

The alloy ingots with nominal compositions of Zr50.7Cu28Ni.9Al12.3 (ZrY0) and (Zr50.7Cu28Ni9Al12.3)98.5Y1.5 (ZrY1.5) were prepared by arc melting high-purity constituents (>99.9 wt.%) under Ti-gettered high-purity argon atmosphere. All ingots were melted and flipped at least four times to ensure compositional homogeneity and then cast into a copper mold to obtain BMG rods with diameters of 5 mm, as shown in Figure 1a. The 1 mm thick specimens cut from these BMG rods were polished and stacked on the top of the anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) templates with 200–300 nm diameter pores. Subsequently, the preforms were placed into the mold cavity and pressed under a constant load of 10 kN. The temperature path of the TPF was set at 20 K/min under a low-vacuum condition (approximately 100–150 Pa) until the temperature reached the set value; see Figure 1b. Afterward, the as-embossed preforms were moved into 3 mol/L KOH solution at 80 ℃ to dissolve the AAO templates, as shown in Figure 1c.
The amorphous nature of BMG specimens before and after TPF was tested using X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku MiniFlex600, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation. The thermodynamic properties of these two BMGs, such as characteristic temperature and relaxation enthalpy, were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, Netzsch 404 F3, NETZSCH-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany) at continuous heating rates of 10 K/min under a flow of high purity argon. Their viscosities as a function of temperature in the supercooled liquid region were measured by using a thermal-mechanical analyzer (TMA, Netzsch Q400EM, NETZSCH-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany) with a heating rate of 10 K/min and a static force of 1.2 N. The oxidation experiments were performed by a thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGA, Mettler-Toledo DSC3+, Columbus, OH, USA) in dry air (>99.99 vol.% pure). The surface morphology of the as-embossed specimen was observed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FEI SEM, Quanta450FEG, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Furthermore, the microstructure of the nanopillar was examined using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, Tecnai F30, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The water contact angle measured via an optical-contact angle-measuring device based on video (DSA 100S, KRÜSS GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used to estimate the wettability of the smooth and as-embossed ZrY1.5 BMG surfaces. The test was conducted in an atmospheric environment with a 2 μL droplet of distilled deionized water at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

The XRD pattern of the ZrY0 BMG shows a slight diffraction peak superimposed with the diffuse halo, revealing the crystalline phases (ZrCu phase) in the amorphous matrix, as shown by the black curve in Figure 2. Different from ZrY0 BMG, no other diffraction peaks of crystalline phases can be observed on the XRD pattern of as-cast ZrY1.5 BMG, indicating a fully amorphous structure and good glass-forming ability (see the gray curve in Figure 2). In general, BMG will entirely change to supercooled liquid and obtain the relatively loose atomic arrangement at the temperature corresponding to the end of glass transition (Tend), causing the activated atoms to easily jump into the adjacent free volume. Therefore, the viscous flow of BMG supercooled liquid will start roughly at Tend [20], and the TPF window can be defined by the temperature from Tend to Tx. From the non-isothermal DSC curves in Figure 3a, ZrY1.5 BMG represents a low Tend and wide TPF region ΔTTPF = TxTend (56 K), which can maintain the disordered structural characteristics after hot exposure to delay the fluidity drop of ZrY1.5 BMG caused by crystallization during thermoplastic forming. In addition, the enthalpy value by the structural relaxation of ZrY1.5 BMG (ΔHZrY1.5) is 1.368 J/g, 43% larger than that of ZrY0 BMG (ΔHZrY0 = 0.957 J/g), revealing a high free volume content (see Figure 3b) [21,22,23,24]. The low atomic stacking density is closely related to the low energy dissipation during creep flow, thereby reducing the viscous resistance of BMG-supercooled liquid. This finding is proven by the TMA scanning curve of ZrY1.5 BMG in Figure 4a. By numerically integrating the inverse of the viscosity curves [25], the variations of thermoplastic formability are intuitively reflected in Figure 4b. Based on these reasons mentioned above, the relatively good thermoplastic formability of ZrY1.5 BMG in the supercooled liquid region can be attributed to the optimized thermodynamic and kinetic properties induced by Y addition [26,27].
The oxidation data obtained from the two as-cast BMGs over the TPF region are shown in Figure 5 and insert. The mass-gain rate for the ZrY1.5 BMG is significantly lower than that for the ZrY0 BMG in the temperature range of interest, similar to that reported in the previous study about the oxidation behavior of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Y BMG systems. Lu et al. [19] pointed out that the Y element can preferentially migrate from the matrix to the surface and suppress the diffusivity of other elements, resulting in a thinner oxide layer so as to decrease the surface tension of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Y supercooled liquid. The improved oxidation resistance of ZrY1.5 BMG reduces the pressure drop of supercooled liquid when flowing in the nanopores. Therefore, the nanostructure can be formed under pressure lower than the fracture strength of the AAO template.
The morphology of the 300 nm nanostructure array on the ZrY1.5 BMG surface after non-isothermal embossing is shown in Figure 6. The lengths of these obtained nanopillars are measured to be over 1 μm, and their aspect ratios exceed 3. The characteristic sizes of the gaps among these nanopillars are about 50 nm, as shown in the insert. The EDS result shows that the content of oxygen is over 60%, indicating an oxygen-rich layer formed on the surface of the nanopillar (Table 1). From the XRD pattern of the as-embossed specimen, some diffraction peaks are superimposed on the amorphous halo, reflecting the complex oxidation products in the surface layer of these nanopillars, including Ni-Al-O, Cu-Al-O, ZrO2, CuO and Al2O3 phases (see the blue curve in Figure 2). The rigid oxygen-rich layer will prohibit the viscous flow of supercooled liquid, causing the original Zr-Cu-Ni-Al BMG systems to be unsuitable for nanostructure fabrication under ambient conditions [28]. However, the oxide layer should not be regarded as just a negative factor affecting thermoplastic formability. In many cases, the tiny oxidation products, as effective sites, boost the various electrocatalytic reactions [29,30,31]. Thus, the nanostructure array can be endowed with different functions by surface modification or surface coating [6].
For investigating the structural state of the as-embossed specimen, the high-angle annular dark-field image of a single nanopillar is shown in Figure 7a. As shown in the figure, the diameter of the nanopillar is measured to be 390 nm, which is consistent with the SEM results. Considering the aspect ratio of a single nanopillar is over 3, the prepared nanostructure array should possess a huge specific surface area. Figure 7b shows two distinct regions, including a nanopillar matrix and surface layer, where the nanopillar matrix still exhibits a fully amorphous structure, as indicated by their corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns (insets of Figure 7b), whereas the surface layer is partially crystallized. Although a small number of oxygen atoms in the ambient dramatically promote the structural ordering of reactive Zr-based BMGs [32,33], the short TPF time (less than 180 s) can restrain the long-distance diffusion of oxygen atoms. Combined with the fact that the micro defects on the AAO templates can be the nucleation site of the crystalline phase, crystallization is only found on the surface and not in the core of the nanopillar. Subsequently, these crystalline phases would be crushed by the BMG supercooled liquid with a Newtonian flow characteristic, thereby forming the discontinuous ordered structures in the surface layer [34,35]. Figure 7c shows the EDXS mapping results of the nanopillar, in which the main component elements (Zr, Cu, Ni, Al, Y and solute O) are dispersed uniformly along the nanopillar. The distribution states of these component elements eliminate the possibility of severe crystallization in the surface layer. That means the as-embossing Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Y BMG can maintain the mass-free volume in those nanopillars to ensure the specific functions depending on the amorphous characteristic, despite the nanoscale-ordered structure generation in the TPF stage.
The water contact angle tests were performed on the ZrY1.5 BMG specimens before and after non-isothermal embossing to study the effects of the nanostructure array on wettability. Figure 8a shows the results for the ZrY1.5 BMG without hot embossing, which is 87° and similar to the values published for other Zr-based BMGs [36], corresponding to an indistinct hydrophilic property of the smooth surface. The water contact angle of the as-embossed surface decreases to 61°, which is 30% lower than that of the smooth surface, as depicted in Figure 8b. Then, the water contact angles on the smooth and as-embossed surface slightly decrease with time (Figure 8c). In this case, a positive effect of the prepared nanostructure array on the wettability can be confirmed. According to conventional wisdom, the preparation of a microstructure on the solid surface is an effective method to improve hydrophobicity [37] because the trapped air prevents the water from wetting the gaps, which changes the apparent property of the macroscopic interface. However, contrary to this common notion, the nanostructure array endows hydrophilic ZrY1.5 BMG with better hydrophilicity. The nanostructure array can decrease the water contact angle of the BMG specimen, probably because the significant capillary effect drives the water to flow into those nanoscale gaps, thereby avoiding the air film between the BMG matrix and water droplet, which indicates that the actual surface of the nanostructure array can be fully wetted by the water (diagrammatic sketch in Figure 8d). This solid–liquid interface is in accordance with a typical state of the Wenzel-impregnating wetting regime [38], which decreases the water contact angle of the as-embossed surface.
Based on Wenzel’s model, cosθ* = rcosθ (where θ is the contact angle on the ideally smooth surface, θ* is the apparent contact angle in a stable equilibrium state and r is the roughness coefficient defined as the proportion of the actual area SA and apparent surface S), the contact angle of the as-embossed surface is controlled by the r value. Taking a single nanopillar as an example (see Figure 9a), the modified Wenzel’s model related to the geometric parameter of the BMG nanostructure array can be written as Equation (1) by substituting SA and S in Figure 9a:
θ * = arccos [ ( 1 + α π β 2 ) × cos θ ]
where α denotes the aspect ratio of a single nanopillar and β denotes the spacing proportion factor. The calculation results reveal that the water contact angle monotonously decreases with the increasing aspect ratio of nanopillar. The high aspect ratio α, leading to a large r-value, can increase the difference between θ and θ* so that the as-embossed surface obtains good wettability. Besides, Equation (1) also indicates the size dependence of the apparent contact angle. The large gaps between nanopillars may weaken the positive effect of capillarity on the liquid–solid interface roughness coefficient, which is unfavorable for the hydrophilicity improvement of the ZrY1.5 BMG surface with nanostructure array by the Wenzel-impregnating wetting regime [39,40,41]. This inference is in agreement with the mathematical relationship between β and θ* for ZrY1.5 BMG (see the black curve and red points in Figure 9b). The small gap significantly decreases the water contact angle of the as-embossed surface, particularly when the spacing proportion factor is less than 1.25, as marked in the shaded box. These theoretical analyses and experimental results can quantify the correlation between the geometric parameters of the BMG nanostructure array and hydrophilicity and guide the design and fabrication of new functional components.

4. Conclusions

The nanostructure array was successfully fabricated on the surface of ZrY1.5 BMG by non-isothermal embossing. The aspect ratio of these prepared 300 nm pillars was more than 3. The relatively complete amorphous characteristic of the as-embossed specimen was retained, and the oxygen-rich layer, including Ni-Al-O, Cu-Al-O, ZrO2, CuO and Al2O3 phases, was formed on the surface of nanopillar after TPF. The wettability of the as-embossed surface follows Wenzel’s model under the capillary effect, which decreased the contact angle from 87° to 61°, thus enhancing the hydrophilicity of ZrY1.5 BMG with a nanostructure array. The present work has developed an environmentally friendly non-noble-metal-based BMG to prepare the nanostructure and prove the application potential of the multifunctional surface with a nanostructure array.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C. and J.S.; methodology, S.C.; validation, S.C., J.M. and F.G.; formal analysis, J.S.; investigation, S.C.; resources, F.G.; data curation, S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C.; writing—review and editing, J.S.; visualization, J.M.; supervision, J.S. and J.M.; project administration, J.S. and J.M.; funding acquisition, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0703605) and the China National Natural Science Foundation (No. 52071217).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, F.; Wu, J.; Jiang, W.; Hu, Q.Z.; Zhang, B. New and efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen production from water splitting: Inexpensive, robust metallic glassy ribbons based on iron and cobalt. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 31340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, Y.C.; Sun, C.X.; Sun, C.W. Functional applications of metallic glasses in electrocatalysis. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 2401–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ghidelli, M.; Orekhov, A.; Bassi, A.L.; Terraneo, G.; Djemia, P.; Abadias, G.; Nord, M.; Béché, A.; Gauquelin, N.; Verbeeck, J.; et al. Novel class of nanostructured metallic glass films with superior and tunable mechanical properties. Acta Mater. 2021, 213, 116955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sarac, B.; Spieckermann, F.; Rezvan, A.; Gammer, C.; Krämer, L.; Kim, J.T.; Keckes, J.; Pippan, J.; Eckert, J. Annealing-assisted high-pressure torsion in Zr55Cu30Al10Ni5 metallic glass. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 784, 1323–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Carmo, M.; Sekol, R.C.; Ding, S.Y.; Kumar, G.; Schroers, J.; Taylor, A.D. Bulk metallic glass nanowire architecture for electrochemical applications. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 2979–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Doubek, G.; Sekola, R.C.; Li, J.Y.; Ryu, W.H.; Gittleson, F.S.; Nejati, S.; Moy, E.; Reid, C.; Carmo, M.; Linardi, M.; et al. Guided evolution of bulk metallic glass nanostructures: A platform for designing 3D electrocatalytic surfaces. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1940–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sekol, R.C.; Kumar, G.; Carmo, M.; Gittleson, F.; Hardesty-Dyck, N.; Mukherjee, S.; Schroers, J.; Taylor, A.D. Bulk metallic glass micro fuel cell. Small 2013, 9, 2081–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kumar, G.; Blawzdziewicz, J.; Schroers, J. Controllable nanoimprinting of metallic glasses: Effect of pressure and interfacial properties. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 105301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liu, X.; Shao, Y.; Feng, J.; Chen, N.; Yao, K.F. Large-area and uniform amorphous metallic nanowire arrays prepared by die nanoimprinting. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 605, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lim, K.R.; Kim, C.E.; Yun, Y.S.; Kim, W.T.; Soon, A.; Kim, D.H. Remarkably stable amorphous metal oxide grown on Zr-Cu-Be metallic glass. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lim, K.R.; Park, J.M.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, E.S.; Kim, W.T.; Gebert, A.; Eckert, J.; Kim, D.H. Enhancement of oxidation resistance of the supercooled liquid in Cu–Zr-based metallic glass by forming an amorphous oxide layer with high thermal stability. Corros. Sci. 2013, 66, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hasan, M.; Warzywoda, J.; Kumar, G. Decoupling the effects of surface texture and chemistry on the wetting of metallic glasses. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 447, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Liu, Z.; Schroers, J. General nanomoulding with bulk metallic glasses. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 145301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gong, P.; Kou, H.C.; Wang, S.B.; Deng, L.; Wang, X.Y.; Jin, J.S. Research on thermoplastic formability and nanomoulding mechanism of lightweight Ti-based bulk metallic glasses. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 801, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hasan, M.; Kumar, G. High-throughput drawing and testing of metallic glass nanostructures. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 3261–3268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gong, P.; Wang, S.B.; Liu, Z.; Chen, W.; Li, N.; Wang, X.Y.; Yao, K.F. Lightweight Ti-based bulk metallic glasses with superior thermoplastic formability. Intermetallics 2018, 98, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, B.; Li, Y.H.; Yang, K.; Li, J.S.; Fan, X.H. Effect of yttrium addition on the non-isothermal crystallization kinetics and fragility of Cu-Zr-Al bulk metallic glass. Thermochim. Acta 2016, 642, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu, S.D.; Sun, S.C.; Li, K.H.; Li, H.Y.; Huang, X.X.; Tu, G.F. The effect of Y addition on the crystallization behaviors of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al bulk metallic glasses. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 799, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, S.D.; Sun, S.C.; Tu, G.F.; Huang, X.X.; Li, K.H. The effect of yttrium addition on the air oxidation behavior of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al bulk metallic glasses at 400–500 °C. Corros. Sci. 2018, 137, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bochtler, B.; Stolpe, M.; Reiplinger, B.; Busch, R. Consolidation of amorphous powder by thermoplastic forming and subsequent mechanical testing. Mater. Des. 2018, 140, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stolpe, M.; Kruzic, J.J.; Busch, R. Evolution of shear bands, free volume and hardness during cold rolling of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2014, 64, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cao, Q.P.; Li, J.F.; Zhou, Y.H.; Jiang, J.Z. Microstructure and microhardness evolutions of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 bulk metallic glass processed by rolling. Scr. Mater. 2008, 59, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cao, Q.P.; Li, J.F.; Zhou, Y.H.; Horsewell, A.; Jiang, J.Z. Free-volume evolution and its temperature dependence during rolling of Cu60Zr20Ti20 bulk metallic glass. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 101901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ghidelli, M.; Gravier, S.; Blandin, J.J.; Pardoen, T.; Jean-Pierre Raskin, J.P.; Mompiou, F. Compositional-induced structural change in ZrxNi100-x thin film metallic glasses. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 615, S348–S351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bochtler, B.; Kruse, O.; Busch, R. Thermoplastic forming of amorphous metals. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2020, 32, 244002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yan, M.; Zou, J.; Shen, J. Effect of over-doped yttrium on the microstructure, mechanical properties and thermal properties of a Zr-based metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2006, 54, 3627–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.; Li, R.; Pang, S.J.; Chen, B.Q.; Georgarakis, K.; Moulecet, A.L.; Vaughan, G.; Zhang, T.; Yavari, A.R. Investigation of viscosity and crystallization in supercooled-liquid region of Zr-based glassy alloys. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2012, 358, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, L.C.; Hasan, M.; Kumar, G. Metallic glass nanostructures: Fabrication, properties, and applications. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 2027–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, H.H.; Ma, Z.; Qiu, Y.F.; Liu, H.; Gao, G.G. Ni@NiO nanowires on nickel foam prepared via “acid hungry” strategy: High supercapacitor performance and robust electrocatalysts for water splitting reaction. Small 2018, 14, 1800249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, Y.L.; Yang, S.Y.; Mao, Z.M.; Li, P.; Zhao, C.L.; Cohick, Z.; Huang, P.H.; Huang, T.J. In situ fabrication of 3D Ag@ZnO nanostructures for micro fluidic surface-enhanced Raman scattering systems. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 12175–12184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Z.Y.; Yadav, R.M.; Sun, L.P.; Zhang, T.Y.; Zhang, J.F.; Ajayan, P.M.; Wu, J.J. CuO/ZnO/C electrocatalysts for CO2-to-C2+ products conversion with high yield: On the effect of geometric structure and composition. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2020, 606, 117829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, W.H.; Meng, Y.H.; Duan, F.H.; Huang, W.; Yao, J.H.; Pan, J.; Wang, Y.X.; Li, Y. The effect of oxygen on phase formation in an industrial Zr based bulk metallic glass. Intermetallics 2021, 129, 107055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cole, K.M.; Kirk, D.W.; Singh, C.V.; Thorpe, S.J. Role of niobium and oxygen concentration on glass forming ability and crystallization behavior of Zr-Ni-Al-Cu-Nb bulk metallic glasses with low copper concentration. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2016, 445–446, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cheng, S.R.; Zhu, J.H.; Shen, J.; Wei, X.S. Effects of yttrium addition on the thermoplastic formability of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al amorphous alloy under non-isothermal condition. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 872, 159684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, C.J.; Cheng, S.R.; Ma, M.Z.; Shan, D.B.; Guo, B. Filling kinetics of Zr-based amorphous supercooled liquid in micro filling process with longer unsteady flow. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2019, 274, 116265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Comby-Dassonneville, S.; Venot, T.; Borroto, A.; Longin, E.; Loughian, C.; Ovanessian, B.; Leroy, M.A.; Pierson, J.F.; Steyer, P. ZrCuAg Thin-Film Metallic Glasses: Toward Biostatic Durable Advanced Surfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 17062–17074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, J.; Su, Q.; Shan, D.B.; Guo, B. Sustainable micro-manufacturing of superhydrophobic surface on ultrafine-grained pure aluminum substrate combining micro-embossing and surface modification. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 232, 705–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wenzel, R.N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936, 28, 988–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Y.L.; Chen, Q.D.; Jin, Z.; Kim, E.; Sum, H.B. Biomimetic graphene films and their properties. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 4858–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feng, L.; Zhang, Y.N.; Cao, Y.Z.; Ye, X.X.; Jiang, L. The effect of surface microstructures and surface compositions on the wettabilities of flower petals. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 2977–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cassie, A.B.D.; Baxter, S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1944, 40, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preparation process of BMG nanostructure: (a) prepare the Zr-based BMG rods by arc melting and copper mold suction casting; (b) hot embossing of nanostructure on the surface of BMG specimens; (c) demolding process of the as-embossed BMG specimens.
Figure 1. Preparation process of BMG nanostructure: (a) prepare the Zr-based BMG rods by arc melting and copper mold suction casting; (b) hot embossing of nanostructure on the surface of BMG specimens; (c) demolding process of the as-embossed BMG specimens.
Metals 11 01520 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the two as-cast BMGs and the as-embossed ZrY1.5 surface.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the two as-cast BMGs and the as-embossed ZrY1.5 surface.
Metals 11 01520 g002
Figure 3. Thermodynamic properties of the as-cast ZrY0 BMG and ZrY1.5 BMG: (a) DSC curves of the two BMGs; (b) the structural relaxation below the glass transition temperature.
Figure 3. Thermodynamic properties of the as-cast ZrY0 BMG and ZrY1.5 BMG: (a) DSC curves of the two BMGs; (b) the structural relaxation below the glass transition temperature.
Metals 11 01520 g003
Figure 4. Kinetic properties of the as-cast ZrY0 BMG and ZrY1.5 BMG: (a) the TMA continuous scanning curves of the two BMGs; (b) the quantitative thermoplastic formability.
Figure 4. Kinetic properties of the as-cast ZrY0 BMG and ZrY1.5 BMG: (a) the TMA continuous scanning curves of the two BMGs; (b) the quantitative thermoplastic formability.
Metals 11 01520 g004
Figure 5. Parabolic plots of the mass-gain data for the ZrY0 BMG and ZrY1.5 BMG under the heating rate of 10 K/min.
Figure 5. Parabolic plots of the mass-gain data for the ZrY0 BMG and ZrY1.5 BMG under the heating rate of 10 K/min.
Metals 11 01520 g005
Figure 6. Morphology of the as-embossed nanostructure array with the characteristic size of 300 nm.
Figure 6. Morphology of the as-embossed nanostructure array with the characteristic size of 300 nm.
Metals 11 01520 g006
Figure 7. (a) Morphology of a single nanopillar with a diameter of 390 nm under TEM. (b) HRTEM image of nanopillar with two typical regions at the boundary; the insets are the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns corresponding to the nanopillar matrix. (c) Energy spectrum analysis of a single nanopillar under TEM.
Figure 7. (a) Morphology of a single nanopillar with a diameter of 390 nm under TEM. (b) HRTEM image of nanopillar with two typical regions at the boundary; the insets are the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns corresponding to the nanopillar matrix. (c) Energy spectrum analysis of a single nanopillar under TEM.
Metals 11 01520 g007
Figure 8. (a) Contact angle on the smooth ZrY1.5 BMG plate. (b) Contact angle on the ZrY1.5 BMG plate with nanostructure array. (c) The variations of water contact angle on the BMG surface before and after non-isothermal embossing. (d) Diagrammatic sketch of a water droplet in contact with the ZrY1.5 BMG plate with nanostructure (Wenzel’s model).
Figure 8. (a) Contact angle on the smooth ZrY1.5 BMG plate. (b) Contact angle on the ZrY1.5 BMG plate with nanostructure array. (c) The variations of water contact angle on the BMG surface before and after non-isothermal embossing. (d) Diagrammatic sketch of a water droplet in contact with the ZrY1.5 BMG plate with nanostructure (Wenzel’s model).
Metals 11 01520 g008
Figure 9. (a) Geometric parameter of BMG nanostructure array. (b) The apparent contact angle of the as-embossed ZrY1.5 BMG surface based on Wenzel’s model.
Figure 9. (a) Geometric parameter of BMG nanostructure array. (b) The apparent contact angle of the as-embossed ZrY1.5 BMG surface based on Wenzel’s model.
Metals 11 01520 g009
Table 1. EDS results of the nanopillar surface.
Table 1. EDS results of the nanopillar surface.
ElementWeight wt. %Atomic at. %
Zr26.719.09
Cu19.189.37
Ni5.162.73
Al11.8213.60
Y4.271.49
O32.8463.72
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, S.; Ma, J.; Gong, F.; Shen, J. Thermoplastic Forming of a Hydrophilic Surface with a Nanostructure Array on Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Y Bulk Metallic Glass. Metals 2021, 11, 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11101520

AMA Style

Cheng S, Ma J, Gong F, Shen J. Thermoplastic Forming of a Hydrophilic Surface with a Nanostructure Array on Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Y Bulk Metallic Glass. Metals. 2021; 11(10):1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11101520

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Sirui, Jiang Ma, Feng Gong, and Jun Shen. 2021. "Thermoplastic Forming of a Hydrophilic Surface with a Nanostructure Array on Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Y Bulk Metallic Glass" Metals 11, no. 10: 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11101520

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop