Next Article in Journal
Edible Insects in Slavic Culture: Between Tradition and Disgust
Previous Article in Journal
Gut Microbiota Affects Host Fitness of Fall Armyworm Feeding on Different Food Types
Previous Article in Special Issue
Verbenone Affects the Behavior of Insect Predators and Other Saproxylic Beetles Differently: Trials Using Pheromone-Baited Bark Beetle Traps
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expanded Geographical Distribution of Coleomegilla maculata lengi (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in North America

1
North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Brookings, SD 57006, USA
2
Department of Biology, Chadron State College, Chadron, NE 69337, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(5), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15050305
Submission received: 11 March 2024 / Revised: 14 April 2024 / Accepted: 19 April 2024 / Published: 25 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity and Abundance of Predators and Parasitoids of Insect Pests)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Coleomegilla maculata lengi is an important insect predator in North American agroecosystems. Collection records reveal that the reputed range for C. maculata lengi has been substantially underestimated. New records indicate an expanded geographic range, including the recent expansion of C. maculata lengi in central North America and a new state record for Wyoming, USA. The expanding geographic range of C. maculata lengi contrasts with that of several species of lady beetles native to North America.

Abstract

Several species of lady beetle native to North America have declined in abundance in the last few decades, often accompanied by contractions in their geographic ranges. Coleomegilla maculata lengi is a lady beetle native to North America that is an important predator of pests in various agroecosystems. Its reported range spans the eastern half of the USA, with no sustained decline in abundance or contraction of its range reported. Indeed, we recently collected several individuals of this lady beetle in central USA roughly 500 km beyond the western edge of its reputed range. We hypothesized that new records could indicate either that previous range characterization failed to include pre-existing collection records further west or that C. maculata lengi has recently expanded its geographic range. To test these hypotheses, we searched several institutional insect collections and digital databases for records and found many earlier records of C. maculata lengi beyond its reputed geographic range, clearly showing that the previous characterization of its geographic distribution in North America was substantially underestimated. In addition, we report a new state record of C. maculata lengi from Wyoming, USA, that further indicates its geographic range expansion in North America. We discuss new records of C. maculata lengi in light of declines in native coccinelline lady beetle species in North America.

1. Introduction

Lady beetles are important predators of arthropod pests, such as aphids, mealybugs, scale insects, and mites [1]. Over the last few decades, several of the larger native species of aphidophagous lady beetles (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae, Coccinellinae, Coccinellini) have decreased in abundance, sometimes becoming locally rare or even locally extinct at various sites in America north of Mexico [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Temporally, these declines started roughly around the time that a small number of non-native coccinelline species were established and spread within the region [2,3,4,5,6,10,11,12].
As native lady beetles have declined in North America, researchers have called for ongoing studies to monitor and assess their populations [2,13,14]. During recent surveys of coccinellines in central USA, we sampled the native lady beetle Coleomegilla maculata lengi Timberlake (Figure 1) from western South Dakota (Pennington County) [15] and western Nebraska (Dawes and Sioux counties) [16].
Coleomegilla maculata lengi is one of three subspecies of Coleomegilla maculata (DeGeer) native to America north of Mexico [17]. Coleomegilla maculata strenua (Casey) is distributed along the southern border of the United States from California to Texas and C. m. fuscilabris (Mulsant) is distributed in Florida, USA, and along the Gulf Coast to Louisiana, USA [17]. The geographic distribution of C. maculata lengi is projected to extend from the Great Lakes region of Canada and the eastern half of the United States south to the coastal areas of Louisiana and Texas along the Gulf of Mexico [17] (Figure 2). The recent collections of C. maculata lengi from western Nebraska and western South Dakota were unexpected as they were roughly 500 km beyond its purported westernmost distribution [17].
Three hypotheses could explain the presence of C. maculata lengi in far western Nebraska and western South Dakota. First, these records of C. maculata lengi could demonstrate a recent western geographic range expansion and provide a counterexample to the trend of contracted geographical ranges for some other North American coccinelline species. Alternatively, western collection records could indicate the establishment of a disjunct population of C. maculata lengi. On the other hand, western records may indicate an underestimate of the distribution range of C. maculata lengi by Gordon [17]. For instance, McAlpine et al. [18] pointed out additional records of C. maculata lengi from the state of Maine, USA, from as early as 1907, indicating that its northeastern distribution had been underestimated [17]. In addition, recent records of C. maculata lengi from southeastern Canada also suggest an underestimate of its northeastern range, a range expansion, or both [18,19]. In light of the new records for C. maculata lengi across North America, we searched insect collections and collection databases for records of C. maculata lengi from the United States and Canada to assess evidence for the three competing hypotheses about this lady beetle’s presence in western South Dakota and western Nebraska.

2. Materials and Methods

To test the various hypotheses, we searched several institutional insect collections and digital databases for records of C. maculata lengi. Collections housed at the following institutions were searched:
  • CSCC: Chadron State College Insect Collection
  • ESUW: University of Wyoming Insect Collection
  • KSUC: Kansas State University
  • NDSU: North Dakota Insect Research Collection
  • SDSU: Severin–McDaniel Insect Research Collection
  • SEMC: University of Kansas, Snow Entomological Museum
  • UNSM: University of Nebraska State Museum
  • NCARL: USDA-ARS North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory Collection
In addition, we searched the online records of C. maculata lengi in the Symbiota Collections of Arthropods Network (SCAN) [20] and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility [21], which yielded specimen records from the following institutions:
  • FMNH: Field Museum of Natural History Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Myriapods
  • NMSU: New Mexico State Collection of Arthropods
Collections were searched for records of C. maculata lengi within an area bounded roughly by 37–50° N latitude and 97–107° W longitude that lay adjacent to its reputed westernmost distribution [17]. As such, the search area included roughly the western three-quarters of the states of Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota; the eastern tier of counties in Colorado, Wyoming, and Montana; and southern portions of the provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan, Canada. We conservatively delimited our searches geographically to roughly the southern border of Kansas because of the potential for confounding subspecies of C. maculata and nomenclatural ambiguity in records from more southern locations [17, personal observations]. Although Gordon [17] did not specify a cut-off date for records used in his treatise of American coccinellids north of Mexico, we limited our searches temporally to records of 1979 and earlier.
Specimen records were categorized by year and county. A subset of the collection records was developed so that only the earliest records of C. maculata lengi for individual counties were retained. The earliest records per county were grouped by decade (e.g., 1910–1919) and used to generate a county-level map depicting the first occurrences of C. maculata lengi by decade (MapChart v.3.0, https://www.mapchart.net/usa-counties.html, accessed 27 February 2024). The map provided a visual aid to evaluate the three hypotheses regarding the recent finds of C. maculata lengi in western Nebraska and western South Dakota, namely, (1) specimens collected west of the reputed range limit many years before 1980 would demonstrate a lack of their accounting in the development of the distribution map [17]; (2) collection records confined to later dates, i.e., mainly the 1970s, and within roughly 150 km of the reputed western range limit would suggest a range expansion that might not have been realized in a 1985 estimate of the beetle’s distribution [17]; and (3) a lack of collection records from points between the eastern and western edges of Nebraska and South Dakota, regardless of date, would suggest a disjunct population far beyond the western edge of the beetle’s main distribution. Ad hoc comparisons of the distributions of collection records were made using a two-sample proportions test [22].

3. Results

3.1. Collection Records, 1910–1979

Altogether, we found 101 specimen records of C. maculata lengi from Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota at locales west of the reputed 1985 distribution range with collection dates that extended from 1910 to 1978. There were 35 distinct location–dates during that period, each comprising one to 52 specimens (Appendix A). The 35 location–dates comprised 26 counties in the four states (Figure 3). No records of C. maculata lengi from 1910 through 1979 were found in states further west, i.e., Colorado, Wyoming, and Montana. Though patchy, records were obtained from several counties in North Dakota, South Dakota, the western three-quarters of Nebraska, and the western two-thirds of Kansas. The proportions of new county records since the midpoint year (1945) differed significantly between counties in the eastern (60 percent) and western (100 percent) portions of the search area (blue line, Figure 3; Z = 2.39, p = 0.008), but did not differ as a latitudinal dichotomy between records from North Dakota and South Dakota (90 percent) versus Nebraska and Kansas (69 percent) (Z = 1.25, p = 0.10).

3.2. New Distribution Record

In addition, while perusing collection data for C. maculata lengi, we came across a recent record from the state of Wyoming, which constitutes a new state record for this lady beetle: USA, WYOMING: Goshen County, Lingle, Ag Exp Station, BII-1, 22 July 2014, M. Benander. The collection site was located in southeastern Wyoming in a county that borders the western edge of Nebraska.

4. Discussion

The collection data in Appendix A support the hypothesis that records from North Dakota, South Dakota, and central and western Nebraska and Kansas were not accounted for in the development of Gordon’s [17] distribution map of C. maculata lengi. Of particular note, a 1978 record of C. maculata lengi from Dawes County, Nebraska (Appendix A), pre-dates recent collection records [16] from that county by >30 years. Though patchy, the records from 1910 to 1978 were distributed at various points across the four-state area, and counter the alternative hypothesis of a disjunct distribution of C. maculata lengi in western Nebraska and southwestern South Dakota. Furthermore, our collection data do not support the hypothesis of an abrupt westward range expansion of C. maculata lengi because records spanned the period of 1910 to 1978, although evidence for a relatively recent westward range expansion was supported by records west of 99.5° longitude occurring exclusively since 1956. Due to the lack of previous records from far western South Dakota and adjacent states to its west, the 2008 record of C. maculata lengi from Pennington County [15] and the 2014 record from Wyoming in this study indicate a continued westward range expansion of C. maculata lengi. The straight-line distance between the site of the earliest westernmost record of C. maculata lengi from Medora, Kansas, in 1910 and the Lingle, Wyoming, record in 2014 is 711 km. Based on the time and distance between those two records, one can surmise that C. maculata lengi has expanded its westward range at a rate of 6.8 km/yr. We did not find rate estimates of range expansion for lady beetle species native to North America, but invasive lady beetles have spread throughout North America at various rates, ranging from 15 km/year for Coccinella undecimpunctata to 415 km/yr for C. septempunctata [23].
Our findings of western records of C. maculata lengi are consistent with additional studies that have shown an underestimation of its previously purported distribution and evidence of geographic expansion in other areas of its range. For instance, McAlpine et al. [18] noted that the omission of C. maculata lengi specimens from southern and central Maine, USA, led to an underestimation of its northeastern range. Additional collection records from northern Maine and New Brunswick, Canada, may reflect either a lack of coccinellid collecting activities in that region or northward expansion [18]. Additional records of C. maculata lengi in the Insectarium de Montréal (IMQC) document the presence of C. maculata lengi in Quebec, Canada, as early as 1975 [20] and provide another instance of range underestimation. Additional northward range expansion by C. maculata lengi in central Canada was documented in 1988 collection records from southern Manitoba [24].
Reasons for discrepancies between the purported distribution of C. maculata lengi [17] and the findings of records outside the reputed range may lie in differences in the sources consulted. Gordon [17] borrowed specimens and consulted with individuals from at least 21 institutions and, remarkably, produced distribution maps or comments on the geographic ranges that accompanied descriptions of all 475 species in his iconic work on the Coccinellidae of America north of Mexico. However, there is no evidence that Gordon [17] investigated specimens from any of the collections that we consulted for central North American records of C. maculata lengi, collections from the Maine State Museum regarding specimens from southern and central Maine, or the IMQC specimens from Quebec.
Analogous examples of incomplete distributional information have been discovered for other beetle taxa. For instance, examinations of regional insect collections have exposed underestimates of distributions of long-horned beetles (Cerambycidae) in eastern Canada [25,26]. These underestimates stemmed from researchers who overlooked regional collections in compiling large-scale geographic distributions and from a lack of researchers working with regional collections to publish records that could have been used in distributional compilations [25]. Furthermore, it may be particularly important to search regional collections and databases for specimen records from near or even beyond the reputed limits of a species’ geographic range to test notions about its distribution and increase the likelihood of accurately mapping the distribution.
The need for accuracy has been heightened by an increasing awareness of changes in the abundance and distribution of North American coccinellid in recent decades [6]. For adventive species, many have continued to expand their geographic ranges in North America and, in some cases, have become invasive [17,23,27,28]. In contrast, the abundance of several native coccinellids has decreased and, in some instances, this has been accompanied by apparent contractions in their geographic ranges [2,3,5,7,12,29]. However, C. maculata lengi is a clear counterexample of a native lady beetle that has increased in relative abundance in some regions (e.g., New York, USA) [10] and that is undergoing an expansion of its geographic distribution, based on evidence from this study and others [18,24]. The reason(s) for its relative abundance and range expansion is unclear, but Losey et al. [10] noted that C. maculata lengi is facultatively pollenivorous (Figure 1) rather than an obligate predator like other coccinellids and that it may, therefore, have been less impacted by competition for food resources with adventive coccinelline species. Follow-up surveys will be needed to delineate the expanding geographic range of C. maculata lengi, and additional studies are needed to determine the reasons for its persistence in light of declines in other native coccinellids.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.H.; methodology, L.H.; formal analysis, L.H.; investigation, L.H. and M.B.; resources, L.H. and M.B.; data curation, L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, L.H.; writing—review and editing, L.H. and M.B.; visualization, L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Louis Sorkin, New York Entomological Society, for permission to use the map in Figure 2. We thank Barb Sharanowski for furnishing collection records at the University of Manitoba and Scott Shaw for sharing specimens from the University of Wyoming. We are grateful to Paul J. Johnson, Zack Falin, Greg Zolnerowich, Gerald Fauske, Scott Shaw, and M.J. Paulsen for access to insect collections at their respective institutions. Lauren Hesler and Sharon Schneider reviewed drafts of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. Pre-1980 Records of Coleomegilla maculata lengi from a Four-State Area in Central USA Bounded Roughly by 37–50° N Latitude and 97–107° W Longitude

StateCountyLocaleDateCollector(s)No. of SpecimensCollection Codon
KansasRenoMedora4 July 1910 1KSUC
Rooks 9 August 1912Francis William1SEMC
Sumner 1916Raymond Beamer3SEMC
OttawaFranklin1 June 1927H. Hungerford1SEMC
SedgwickWichita15 June 1931 1NMSU
SedgwickWichita18 August 1931 1NMSU
OttawaFranklin1 June 1956D. Lang2SEMC
Sedgwick 29 October 1957J.R. Zimmerman1NMSU
KingmanKingman, 8 mi W10 May 1962Charles Michener1SEMC
Stafford August 1978 1KSUC
NebraskaRed Willow7 mi. E. of McCook27 August 1958Atyeo and Anderson1UNSM
Dawson 29 May 1968A. Beltran52UNSM
Dawson 29 May 1968K. Pruess1UNSM
CherryValentine23 June 1968A. Beltran2UNSM
ThomasHalseyJuly 1969 1UNSM
Red WillowMcCook29 May 1971B.C. Ratcliffe1UNSM
Scotts BluffScottsbluff/17 April 1974F. Snocker1CSCC
North Platte River
Garden 27 July 1974W. T. Morgan1CSCC
GosperElwood18 June 1975A. F. Newton, M. K. Thayer1FMNH
Franklin 18–24 June 1978 3UNSM
Dawes 10 October 1978 1CSCC
North DakotaCassFargo, NDAC7 August 1956Richard L. Post1NDSU
CassFargo1957 1NDSU
RichlandWalcot Dunes10 July 1973Tim L. McCabe1NDSU
CassFargo27 September 1973P.K. Lago1NDSU
RichlandMirror Pool27 May 1974P.K. Lago1NDSU
Morton6 mi E Glen Ullin1 August 1975P.K. and B.A. Lago1NDSU
Oliver2 mi E Hensler20 July 1978E.U. Balsbaugh1NDSU
South DakotaDavisonMitchell21 August 1929 2SDSU
BruleChamberlain14 September 1946 4SDSU
BruleChamberlain17 June 1947 1SDSU
Bon HommeSpringfield28 May 1954 4SDSU
HutchinsonDimock1 September 1954 1SDSU
StanleyHayes2 August 1967 2SDSU
YanktonYankton13 May 1974 1NDSU
YanktonYankton11 June 1974 1NDSU

References

  1. Michaud, J.P. Coccinellids in biological control. In Ecology and Behaviour of the Ladybird Beetles (Coccinellidae); Hodek, I., van Emden, H.F., Honěk, A., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. xxxvii + 561. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wheeler, A.G., Jr.; Hoebeke, E.R. Coccinella novemnotata in northeastern North America: Historical occurrence and current status (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Proc Entomol. Soc. Washington 1995, 97, 701–716. [Google Scholar]
  3. Elliott, N.; Kieckhefer, R.; Kauffman, W. Effects of an invading coccinellid on native coccinellids in an agricultural landscape. Oecologia 1996, 105, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Turnock, W.J.; Wise, I.L.; Matheson, F.O. Abundance of some native coccinellines (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) before and after the appearance of Coccinella septempunctata. Can. Entomol. 2003, 135, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alyokhin, A.; Sewell, G. Changes in a lady beetle community following the establishment of three alien species. Biol. Invasions 2004, 6, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Harmon, J.P.; Stephens, E.; Losey, J. The decline of native coccinellids (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the United States and Canada. J. Insect Conserv. 2007, 11, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hesler, L.S.; Kieckhefer, R.W. Status of exotic and previously common native coccinellids (Coleoptera) in South Dakota landscapes. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 2008, 81, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hesler, L.S.; Beckendorf, E.A. Declining abundance of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) among crop and prairie habitats of eastern South Dakota, USA. Front. Conserv. Sci. 2021, 2, 742036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bahlai, C.A.; Colunga-Garcia, M.; Gage, S.H.; Landis, D.A. The role of exotic ladybeetles in the decline of native ladybeetle populations: Evidence from long-term monitoring. Biol. Invasions 2015, 17, 1005–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Losey, J.E.; Allee, L.L.; Stephens, E.; Smyth, R.R.; Priolo, P.; Tyrrell, L.; Chaskey, S.; Stellwag, L. Lady beetles in New York: Insidious invasions, erstwhile extirpations, and recent rediscoveries. Northeast. Nat. 2014, 21, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Evans, E.W. Fates of rare species under siege from invasion: Persistence of Coccinella novemnotata Herbst in western North America alongside an invasive congener. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 5, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Petersen, M.J.; Losey, J.E. Niche overlap with an exotic competitor mediates the abundant niche-centre relationship for a native lady beetle. Divers. Distrib. 2024, 30, e13825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ellis, D.R.; Prokrym, D.R.; Adams, R.G. Exotic lady beetle survey in northeastern United States: Hippodamia variegata and Propylea quatuordecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Entomol. News 1999, 110, 73–84. [Google Scholar]
  14. Obrycki, J.J.; Elliott, N.C.; Giles, K.L. Coccinellid introductions: Potential for and evaluation of nontarget effects. In Nontarget Effects of Biological Control; Follett, P.A., Duan, J.J., Eds.; Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA, USA, 2000; pp. xiii + 316. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hesler, L.S.; Catangui, M.A.; Losey, J.E.; Helbig, J.B.; Mesman, A. Recent records of Adalia bipunctata (L.), Coccinella transversoguttata richardsoni Brown, and Coccinella novemnotata Herbst (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) from South Dakota and Nebraska. Coleopts. Bull. 2009, 63, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bartlett, P.B.; Hesler, L.S.; French, B.W.; Catangui, M.A.; Gritzner, J.H. Lady beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in western South Dakota and western Nebraska and detection of reproducing populations of Coccinella novemnotata. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2015, 108, 474–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gordon, R.D. The Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) of America north of Mexico. J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 1985, 93, 1–912. [Google Scholar]
  18. McAlpine, D.F.; Migneault, R.; Webster, R.P. Coleomegilla maculata lengi Timberlake, 1943 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), a native North American lady beetle new to Maritime Canada. J. Acadian Entomol. Soc. 2018, 14, 8–10. [Google Scholar]
  19. Finlayson, C.J.; Landry, K.M.; Alyokhin, A.V. Abundance of native and non-native lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in different habitats in Maine. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2008, 101, 1078–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. SCAN (Symbiota Collections of Arthropods Network). 2024. Available online: http://symbiota4.acis.ufl.edu/scan/portal/ (accessed on 25 February 2024).
  21. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility). 2024. Available online: https://gbif.org (accessed on 26 February 2024).
  22. Zar, J.H. Biostatistical Analysis, 5th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. xiii + 944. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hemptinne, J.-L.; Magro, A.; Evans, E.W.; Dixon, A.F. Body size and the rate of spread of invasive ladybird beetles in North America. Biol. Invasions 2012, 14, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wise, I.L.; Turnock, W.J.; Roughly, R.E. New records of coccinellid species for the Province of Manitoba. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Manitoba 2001, 57, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  25. McCorquodale, D.B.; Bondrup-Nielsen, S. Do we know beetles? Lessons from new records of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) for Nova Scotia. Proc. Nova Scotia Instit. Sci. 2004, 42, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Majka, C.G.; McCorquodale, D.B.; Smith, M.E. The Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of Prince Edward Island: New records and further lessons in biodiversity. Can. Entomol. 2007, 139, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schaefer, P.W.; Dysart, R.J.; Specht, H.B. North American distribution of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and its mass appearance in coastal Delaware. Environ. Entomol. 1987, 16, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Koch, R.L.; Venette, R.C.; Hutchison, W.D. Invasions by Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the western hemisphere: Implications for South America. Neotropic. Entomol. 2006, 35, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Diepenbrock, L.M.; Fothergill, K.; Tindall, K.V.; Losey, J.E.; Smyth, R.R.; Finke, D.L. The influence of exotic lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) establishment on the species composition of the native lady beetle community in Missouri. Environ. Entomol. 2016, 45, 855–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Coleomegilla maculata lengi consuming eggs of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (A); pollen of buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum (B); and dandelion, Taraxacum officianale (C). Photo credits: Peggy Greb (A), Jim Eklund (B), and Eric Beckendorf (C), all USDA-ARS.
Figure 1. Coleomegilla maculata lengi consuming eggs of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (A); pollen of buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum (B); and dandelion, Taraxacum officianale (C). Photo credits: Peggy Greb (A), Jim Eklund (B), and Eric Beckendorf (C), all USDA-ARS.
Insects 15 00305 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of Coleomegilla maculata lengi (gray shading, eastern North America; Gordon 1985). Original figure used by permission of the New York Entomological Society.
Figure 2. Distribution of Coleomegilla maculata lengi (gray shading, eastern North America; Gordon 1985). Original figure used by permission of the New York Entomological Society.
Insects 15 00305 g002
Figure 3. Counties in central USA with collection records of Coleomegilla maculata lengi. Numbers depict decades of the first pre-1980 collection record in a county west of the reputed distribution. Dots depict counties with recent collection records: brown, 2008, Pennington Co., SD; red, 2010 and 2011, Dawes Co., NE; and yellow, Goshen Co., WY, 2014. Dashed line indicates western edge of reputed range in 1985. Blue line demarcates eastern and western portions of records area. ND = North Dakota, SD = South Dakota, NE = Nebraska, KS = Kansas, WY = Wyoming.
Figure 3. Counties in central USA with collection records of Coleomegilla maculata lengi. Numbers depict decades of the first pre-1980 collection record in a county west of the reputed distribution. Dots depict counties with recent collection records: brown, 2008, Pennington Co., SD; red, 2010 and 2011, Dawes Co., NE; and yellow, Goshen Co., WY, 2014. Dashed line indicates western edge of reputed range in 1985. Blue line demarcates eastern and western portions of records area. ND = North Dakota, SD = South Dakota, NE = Nebraska, KS = Kansas, WY = Wyoming.
Insects 15 00305 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hesler, L.; Brust, M. Expanded Geographical Distribution of Coleomegilla maculata lengi (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in North America. Insects 2024, 15, 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15050305

AMA Style

Hesler L, Brust M. Expanded Geographical Distribution of Coleomegilla maculata lengi (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in North America. Insects. 2024; 15(5):305. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15050305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hesler, Louis, and Mathew Brust. 2024. "Expanded Geographical Distribution of Coleomegilla maculata lengi (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in North America" Insects 15, no. 5: 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15050305

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop