Next Article in Journal
Secondary Rhinaria Contribute to Major Sexual Dimorphism of Antennae in the Aphid Semiaphis heraclei (Takahashi)
Previous Article in Journal
Lymantria Dispar Iflavirus 1 RNA Comprises a Large Proportion of RNA in Adult L. dispar Moths
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 5
10.3390/insects14050467
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Forensic DNA Analysis of Mixed Mosquito Blood Meals: STR Profiling for Human Identification

by
Ashraf Mohamed Ahmed
1,*,
Amani Mohammed Alotaibi
2,
Wedad Saeed Al-Qahtani
2,
Frederic Tripet
3 and
Sayed Amin Amer
2,*
1
Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Forensic Sciences, College of Criminal Justice, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences, Riyadh 11587, Saudi Arabia
3
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(5), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050467
Submission received: 2 April 2023 / Revised: 10 May 2023 / Accepted: 11 May 2023 / Published: 16 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Role of Insects in Human Society)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Blood-fed mosquitoes found at crime scenes can provide human blood traces for genetic analysis that aid in forensic investigations. Because a mosquito can obtain its blood meal from two or more sources, this study aims to determine whether it is possible to obtain a human DNA profile from the blood meal of a single Culex pipiens mosquito experimentally fed on mixed blood of human male-female or human-mice. Twenty-four human STR loci were amplified over a complete digestion profile post-feeding. Data revealed that full, complete, and partial STR profiles could be obtained from all blood meal types up to 12, 24, and 36 h post-feeding, respectively. The mixed human–animal blood maximized the DNA degradation and, thus, impaired STR identification beyond 36 h until they became poorly detectable at 48 h post-feeding. These results indicate that human DNA can be obtained from mosquito blood meals, even if it is mixed with non-human blood, for up to 36 h post-feeding.

Abstract

Mosquito vectors captured at a crime scene are forensically valuable since they feed on human blood, and hence, human DNA can be recovered to help identify the victim and/or the suspect. This study investigated the validity of obtaining the human short tandem repeats (STRs) profile from mixed blood meals of the mosquito, Culex pipiens L. (Diptera, Culicidae). Thus, mosquitoes were membrane-feed on blood from six different sources: a human male, a human female, mixed human male-female blood, mixed human male-mouse blood, mixed human female-mouse blood, and mixed human male-female-mouse blood. DNA was extracted from mosquito blood meals at 2 h intervals up to 72 h post-feeding to amplify 24 human STRs. Data showed that full DNA profiles could be obtained for up to 12 h post-feeding, regardless of the type of blood meal. Complete and partial DNA profiles were obtained up to 24 h and 36 h post-feeding, respectively. The frequencies of STR loci decreased over time after feeding on mixed blood until they became weakly detectable at 48 h post-feeding. This may indicate that a blood meal of human blood mixed with animal blood would contribute to maximizing DNA degradation and thus affects STR identification beyond 36 h post-feeding. These results confirm the feasibility of human DNA identification from mosquito blood meals, even if it is mixed with other types of non-human blood, for up to 36 h post-feeding. Therefore, blood-fed mosquitoes found at the crime scene are forensically valuable, as it is possible to obtain intact genetic profiles from their blood meals to identify a victim, a potential offender, and/or exclude a suspect.

1. Introduction

Violent crimes are committed all over the world and usually result in bloodshed. The accurate detection and confirmation of human blood traces and bloodstains obtained from crime scenes are crucial in forensic analysis [1]. The information gained from the correct analysis of bloodstains can include what did (or did not) take place, answer the question of who may have been involved in these actions, and could be the determining factor between guilt and innocence. Blood is usually found at the crime scene as dried stains on clothes or solid surfaces, such as wood, knives, brick, etc., which need specific materials and methods for proper collection and identification [2]. In comparison, a blood-fed mosquito (if found at the crime scene) can provide a fresh human blood sample (its blood meal) that is suitable for forensic analysis [3]. Adult female mosquitoes of the genera Aedes, Culex, and Anopheles (Family Culicidae) feed on human and animal blood to obtain essential nutrients needed for vitellogenesis (egg production) [4,5,6]. After blood feeding, mosquitoes tend to stay for a few hours near the site where they took their blood meals [6,7,8] and prefer to take another blood meal a couple of hours later [5]. This particular feeding behavior makes mosquitoes potentially useful evidence if found at the crime scene, as their blood meal can be considered a human trace sample; hence, it is a real forensic investigation tool [9,10].
Several previous studies have observed and documented mosquitoes at crime scenes in different countries [11,12,13]. These studies provided evidence that blood-fed mosquitoes found at crime scenes can be used as a valuable source of forensic information that could solve a case, as they could have fed on the blood of a suspect or victim [11]. Thus, human DNA profiles can be determined from the mosquito blood meal, which facilitates the identification of a victim at the crime scene or determines whether a potential suspect was present nearby.
The analysis of short tandem repeats (STRs) found on human DNA obtained from blood-fed mosquitoes is currently a new approach used in forensic investigations in order to determine the identity of individuals [14]. These STRs are located in non-coding regions of the DNA, and each of them is composed of repeated units seen in tandem at a particular location on a chromosome [15], and consequently, they can be used for generating a characteristic DNA profile for a person [14,15]. Several previous studies have shown the possibility of obtaining forensically valuable human DNA profiles from blood meals of various mosquito species up to 48 h after the blood meal. These DNA profiles were successfully used to determine the identity of the persons from whom the blood meals were taken [3,9,12,13,16,17].
However, there are two major limitations to using mosquitoes as a source of human DNA at the crime scene that should be taken into account: (a) the DNA degradation that occurs after a blood meal by the digestion process that can last 60–70 h [18]. In this regard, several studies have investigated the effect of post-feeding time on generating full STR profiles from DNA extracted from mosquito blood meals, ranging from 24 to 48 h, with the possibility of performing successful human identification up to 72 h post-feeding [3,12,19]; (b) DNA extraction and quantification from mosquito blood meals is time-consuming, labor-intensive, expensive, and consumes all of the mosquito samples. However, this issue has been mitigated by using direct amplification methods to produce DNA profiles within a short period of time [20,21].
Biological traces detected at a crime scene may contain mixtures of two or more sources and therefore have forensic value [22]. The objective of this study was to explore the capability of obtaining STR profiles on human DNA recovered from blood meals of the mosquito, Cx. pipiens L., upon feeding on mixed human and animal blood. The Swiss albino mouse, Musculus domesticus, was used in this study as a source of animal blood. Non-mixed blood meals taken from humans, male or female, or mixed with mice blood were used for DNA profiling over the digestion period post-feeding.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Mosquitoes

A stock colony of Cx. pipiens L. mosquitoes were reared in the insectary of the Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, under standardized conditions according to [23]. Briefly, 6-day-old adult female mosquitoes were starved for 12 h prior to blood feeding on a healthy male Swiss albino mouse obtained from the Animal House, Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University. The mouse was anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with TEKAM 50 (Pharmaceuticals, Amman, Jorden) prior to the mosquito blood feeding, which lasted for 20–30 min. Three days later, plastic pots filled with distilled water were provided for mosquito egg-laying. Each of the 200 newly hatched larvae was distributed into 1 L of distilled water in plastic trays (34 × 24 × 10 cm3 each). One drop of Liquifry (Interpet Ltd., Dorking, UK) was added to each dish for the first two days, and then ground Goldfish Flake Food (Warldley®, The Hartz Mountain Corporation, Secaucus, NJ, USA) was provided until pupation. The resulting pupae were separated daily, placed in distilled water-filled polystyrene pots, and kept in their rearing wooden cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm3) until the adult emergence of the next generation. The resulting adult mosquitoes were allowed permanent access to a 10% glucose solution (w/v) ad libitum and were continuously reared in adequate numbers for the experimental purposes of this study.

2.2. Experimental Mice

The Swiss albino male mouse, Musculus domesticus, was tested, housed, and handled according to the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) and Federal Animal Welfare guidelines. All animals were housed in the breeding rooms of experimental animals under constant temperature (20–22 °C) in the Animal House of Zoology Dept., College of Science, King Saud University. Briefly, a good-sized plastic cage (25 × 22 × 30 cm3) with wires coated with a metal mesh with holes for water and food supply were cleaned twice a week. The cages had translucent walls, which enable experimenters to observe them. Animals were given ad libitum access to food from the General Company of Oils and Grain in Riyadh. All mice were maintained under a 12 h light: 12 h dark photocycle.

2.3. Blood Samples

2.3.1. Human Blood

All human donors voluntarily provided written permission to participate in the study and to obtain their blood samples for research purposes. Healthy adult human donors included a 21-year-old male and a 40-year-old female of similar blood groups (O+) and participated in this study after providing informed consent. Blood samples (4 mL each) were collected from arm veins into a 4.0 mL Lithium Heparin tube (Sterilite®, Townsend, MA, USA) (www.sterilite.com, accessed on 12 May 2023) and immediately used for membrane feeding of the experimental mosquitoes.

2.3.2. Mice Blood

The experimental Swiss albino mouse (≈25 g, 12–14 weeks old) was used in this study as a source of animal blood. Blood was freshly collected by cardiac puncture, as detailed in List [24], prior to experimental use. Briefly, the mouse was anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with TEKAM 50 (Pharmaceuticals, Amman, Jorden). Under anesthesia, the mouse was placed in dorsal recumbency, and an appropriately sized needle of a heparinized syringe was directed and inserted toward the animal’s heart (held 20–30 degrees off horizontal). Up to 0.75 mL of blood can be collected from one mouse of 25 g weight [24]. Collected blood samples from five mice were immediately pooled into a 4.0 mL lithium heparin tube. Prior to experimental use, blood-tubes were kept in a water bath at 37 °C for 5 min as recommended by [25].

2.4. Mosquito Membrane Feeding

Mosquitoes were allowed to feed on the experimental blood using the Hemotek 5W1 Membrane Feeding System (Hemotek, Blackburn, UK) (http://hemotek.co.uk/products/, accessed on 12 May 2023) according to the manufacturer’s instruction manual as detailed in [26]. Mosquitoes were allowed to membrane-feed on the blood samples for 20–30 min. Upon feeding, fully engorged blood-fed mosquitoes were collected and used for experimental purposes.

2.5. Experimental Design

In this study, the effect of mixed blood meals on the quality of human DNA profiling over the complete digestion profile post-feeding was investigated. Six groups of 6-day-old mosquitoes (100 mosquitoes in each group) were starved for 12 h prior to membrane feeding on human or mixed human-mouse blood. Groups 1 and 2 (G1 and G2) were allowed to feed on the blood of a human male and a human female, respectively. Group 3 (G3) was allowed to feed on equally mixed blood (1:1, v:v) of the human male and female. Groups 4 and 5 (G4 and G5) were allowed to feed on equally mixed blood (1:1, v:v) of the human female and mouse, and the human male and mouse, respectively. Group 6 (G6) was allowed to feed on equally mixed blood of the human male, human female, and mouse (1:1:1, v:v:v).
Immediately after blood feeding, 100 fully engorged female mosquitoes from each mosquito group were randomly collected, assigned to small cages (10 × 10 × 10 cm3), and allowed access to 10% glucose solution ad libitum until used for dissection. In each group, five fully engorged females (n = 5) were randomly collected at each of the experimental time intervals (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h post-feeding) to cover the complete digestion period [18,27]. Blood-fed mosquitoes were stored at −80 °C until used for dissection. Mosquitoes were dissected in cold Aedes physiological saline (150 mmolL−1 NaCl, 4 mmolL−1 KCl, 1 mmolL−1 CaCl2, 0.1 mmolL−1 NaHCO3, 0.6 mmolL−1 MgCl2 buffered with 25 mmolL−1 Hepes) according to [28] under a stereo dissection microscope (Optech®, Exacta Optech, München, Germany) for extracting their whole abdomens. In parallel with each relevant experiment, unfed mosquito abdomens and 6 µL of human or mouse blood samples, which is equal to a mosquito blood meal size [29,30], were used as controls. Control samples and mosquito blood meals were used for DNA extraction, as detailed below.

2.6. DNA Extraction and Quanitation

Human DNA was extracted from the abdomens of control and blood-feed mosquitoes, human blood, and mouse blood samples using the QIAamp DNA micro kit (Qiagen Co., Manchester, UK), following the manufacturer’s instructions and as detailed in [13]. DNA concentration was measured using the Quantifiler® Duo DNA Quantification Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNAs were used for STR profiling from control and experimental blood samples, as detailed below.

2.7. STRs Profiling

A polymerase chain reaction was performed using the PowerPlex® Fusion System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to [31] following the instruction manual. This system co-amplifies 23 STR loci (D3S1358, D1S1656, D2S441, D10S1248, D13S317, Penta E, D16S539, D18S51, D2S1338, CSF1PO, Penta D, TH01, vWA, D21S11, D7S820, D5S818, TPOX, DYS391, D8S1179, D12S391, D19S433, FGA, D22S1045) and the Amelogenin locus for sex determination [32]. PCR amplification was carried out using the Applied Biosystems Veriti™ Thermal Cycler (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The PCR products (1 µL) were separated by capillary electrophoresis in an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Company, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with reference to the BTO size standard (Qiagen, Manchester, UK) in a total of 12 µL master mix consisting of the BTO size standard and Hi-Di formamide (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The analytical threshold for the PowerPlex® Fusion analysis in GeneMapper ID-X was set at 175 RFU. However, the allele call for some peaks was cleaned manually.

2.8. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed for DNA concentrations using Prism software (v6.0; GraphPad), while data from STR profiling were analyzed using Gene Mapper® ID v3.2 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. DNA Quantification

DNA was successfully recovered from mosquito blood meals until 36 h post-feeding. The concentration of each DNA sample was quantified in triplicate (n = 3), and the mean values were calculated. As shown in Figure 1, the correlation between concentrations of DNA extracted from the blood meals of the different experimental mosquito groups at each of the experimental time intervals post-feeding until it became weakly detectable at 48 h and undetectable at 72 h post-feeding. These data revealed that DNA concentrations gradually decreased over time post-feeding in all experimental groups. The data in Table 1 represent the concentration and Ct values of DNA in all experimental groups at each time point post-blood meal. The average DNA concentrations after immediate extraction (0 h post-feeding) were 1.25, 1.30, 1.73, 1.29, 1.25, and 1.04 ng/µL in the blood meals of the 6 experimental groups: G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, and G6, respectively. These concentrations declined to 0.004, 0.007, 0.008, 0.007, 0.002, and 0.001 ng/µL at 48 h post-feeding. The concentrations of DNA extracted from control blood samples were significantly higher (p ≥ 0.05; n = 3; student’s t-Test) (ranging between 144.39 and 288.17 ng/μL) compared to those of DNA extracted from experimental mosquito blood meals (Table 1).

3.2. STR Profiling

Data from STR genotyping analysis showed full STR profiles obtained from all mosquito blood meals at 0–12 h post-feeding in all experimental groups and the control samples. However, after 12 h post-feeding, the frequencies of STR loci in DNA profiles decreased with increasing post-feeding time intervals, regardless of the type of blood used to feed mosquitoes. Moreover, partial STR profiles were obtained from mosquito blood meals 24–48 h post-feeding. Figure 2a–d shows an example of the STR profiles from the mosquito blood meal of the first group (G1) (taken from a human male) at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h post-feeding.
Data in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7 represent the STR profiles for the entire set for analyses of all the experimental groups (G1–G6). Complete profiles for the 24 STR loci were obtained from all groups through (0–12 h) post-blood feeding. A complete STR profile was obtained at 24 h post-feeding. In comparison, between the types of blood meals offered to mosquitoes, full STR profiles were obtained up to 24 h from mosquitoes fed on human female blood, mixed human male-human female blood, and mixed human male-human female-mouse blood (Table 2, Table 4 and Table 7, respectively). However, only partial STR profiles were obtained after 24 h post-feeding, but this was still informative in most groups, except for mosquito blood meals taken from human males (Table 3).
Data in Table 4 and Table 5 represent incomplete STR profiles obtained from blood meals after 36 h post-feeding, except those obtained from blood meals taken from human female and mixed human female-human male blood (experimental groups G2 and G3, respectively), with only two missing STR loci (vWA and DYS391). On the other hand, only three STR loci (D18S51, D8S1179, and FGA) were obtained from blood meals of G1 (taken from human male blood), and two incomplete STR loci (D19S433 and FGA) were obtained from blood meals of G5 (taken from mixed human female-mice blood) were detected after 36 h post-feeding, respectively (Table 3 and Table 7). Additionally, five STR loci (D18S51, D8S1179, D12S391, D19S433, and FGA) obtained from blood meals of G4 (taken from mixed human male-mouse blood) and six STR loci (Amelogenin, D3S1358, D1S1656, D2S441, D10S1248, and D13S317) obtained from blood meals of G6 (taken from mixed human male-human female-mouse blood) were detected after 36 h post-feeding, as shown in Table 6 and Table 7.
At 48 h post-feeding and onward, no STR profiles were obtained from blood meals of the experimental groups G1 (taken from human male blood), G3 (taken from mixed human male-human female blood), and G5 (taken from mixed human male-mouse blood). However, partial STR profiles were obtained from blood meals of groups G2 (taken from human female blood), G4 (taken from mixed human female-mouse blood), and G6 (taken from mixed human male-human female-mouse blood). Blood meals from G2 yielded a partial STR profile with only two missing STR loci (CSF1PO and DYS391) (Table 4). While groups G4 and G6 yielded five STR loci (D18S51, D8S1179, D12S391, D19S433, and FGA) and only one STR locus (Ahmelogenin), respectively (Table 6 and Table 7). These data may indicate that it is possible to use mosquito blood meals to identify suspects until 36 h post-feeding. It is also possible to identify suspects until the same period of post-feeding, even when mixed with non-human blood.

4. Discussion

Insects collected at the crime scene can serve as a source of DNA information in forensic casework [33]. This trace DNA can be obtained from a human blood meal ingested by hematophagous insects found at or nearby the crime scene, like lice [34], bed bugs [35], and mosquitoes [3,14]. These insects need blood meals mainly for vitellogenesis (egg production) [6]. In mosquitoes, the blood meal size and the time elapsed for its complete digestion vary among species and are influenced by several factors. These factors include age, mating behavior, gonotrophic cycle, ambient temperature, and blood meal source [5,6,8,18,29,30]. The Cx. pipiens L. mosquito targeted in the current study takes about 60 to 70 hours to completely digest the blood meal [18]. The current study investigated the capability of human DNA profiling over a 72 h period post-blood meal.
There are four important characteristics that strongly support the practical use of mosquitoes as a forensic substrate at a crime scene: (a) there are over 3600 species of mosquitoes, and some are commonly found worldwide [36]; (b) there are variations in mosquito behavior, including differences in flight, feeding time, and host preference. As a result, these behavioral variations increase the likelihood of use in forensic applications [3]; (c) The blood-fed mosquitoes often rest at or near the location of their host until they have digested enough of the blood to be able to fly [16,37]. This is advantageous from the forensic point of view, as blood-fed mosquitoes are more likely to rest at or near a crime scene for digestion; (d) Mosquitoes can feed on multiple blood sources [38], which provides an opportunity to detect and interpret the profiles of multiple hosts. Using a mosquito, if found at a crime scene and a mixed profile is obtained from its blood meal, to pursue more than one person engaged in the crime or present nearby. Several studies have successfully used blood-fed mosquitoes found at a crime scene to obtain forensically valuable human DNA profiles, which are then used to identify potential suspects in forensic cases [11,14].
The quantification of DNA extracted from crime scene trace samples is an important factor in forensic DNA analysis because it determines whether the DNA data is of sufficient quantity and quality to produce a successful STR profile [15]. It is sometimes challenging to conduct forensic analysis of human DNA from trace samples since it can be affected by some factors like degradation, insufficient amounts, and low quality and, subsequently, can limit the analysis process [9,11,12,18]. As the Ct value increases, the possibility of sample contamination or DNA degradation could be possible. The reliability of detecting reasonable copy numbers of DNA increases if the Ct value is lower than 40. In this study, Ct values indicate that DNA was detectable and amplifiable [39]. The current study included 24 variable-sized STR loci, including amelogenin, to allow a broader analysis of the human DNA samples extracted from the mosquito blood meal and also because these loci include the CODIS core loci and European Standard Set (ESS) loci [3,19,40]. Some DNA samples in the current study had insufficient quantities, which could be due to two possible reasons: the first is that mosquitoes were fed on mixed blood samples treated with heparin as anticoagulants instead of being exposed directly to the human body [12]. The second is the digestion/nuclease activity in the mosquito’s gut that could cause DNA degradation and, consequently, a reduction in DNA quantity [41]. Further studies might be conducted to compare the efficiency of different DNA extraction kits in obtaining sufficient DNA quantities that have been obtained by using the QIAamp DNA micro kit (Qiagen Co., Ltd., Manchester, UK) alone. This could increase the possibility of overcoming the abovementioned limitations and produce more allele frequencies at 48 h post-feeding.
This study reported complete STR profiles ranging from 0.003 to 1.74 (ng/μL) and ≈30 to 1740 (pg/µL) in the human DNA extracted from mosquito blood meals. Previous studies on the autosomal STR loci of the U.S. population data produced full STR profiles even from fewer DNA quantities [42]. Moreover, 15 forensically valid genetic loci were successfully obtained from a 28 pg DNA concentration [9]. In the current study, STR profiles were obtained up to 36 h post-feeding, after which they became poorly detectable at 48 h post-feeding. This could be attributed to DNA degradation in the mosquito’s midgut by the digestive enzymes [15,41]. Several previous studies reported successful amplification of complete STR profiles from human DNA extracted from mosquitoes, but with variations in the maximum post-feeding interval that could still yield full profiles. In some cases, full STR profiles were obtained up to 24 h post-feeding of Ae. aegypti on mixed blood of four people [12], while others obtained full STR profiles up to 48 h post-feeding of other mosquito types [9,16,43] and 72 h post-feeding [35]. These variations could be attributed to different factors, such as the mosquito species, the volume of ingested blood, the inhibitors found in the mosquito’s midgut, the digestion status, and other factors related to the host (human), such as sex and environmental conditions [6]. Moreover, the results confirmed a higher reduction in the allele frequencies in the human male DNA samples than that in the human female. Similar findings were reported in previous studies [3,44]. DNA samples from mixed blood meals from human males and/or females with mouse blood showed less number of alleles than non-mixed human blood samples and mixed human male-human female blood meals. The study also revealed that the interval time pertaining to digestion status on the mosquito’s blood meal had a strong impact on both the DNA quantity and allele frequency. Further, the study also revealed an extensive reduction in the frequency of alleles at 36 to 48 h post-feeding. Evidence for similar observations has been provided by previous studies [15].
The number of STR loci reported in the current study was higher in the human female DNA sample than that of the male. This difference could be attributed to our personal observation that mosquitoes prefer female blood during feeding, as discussed earlier. However, a previous study reported similar mosquito feeding (biting) patterns in both men and women [9]. Other previous studies revealed that Anopheles stephensi, Aedes aegypti, and Anopheles gambiae preferred men’s blood because of odor and hormonal factors [6,45,46]. In this context, many factors affect the feeding preferences of female mosquitoes, such as blood viscosity, temperatures, pH, and salt contents (blood osmosis) [6]. Mosquitoes are twice as likely to be attracted to blood with high CO2 levels and a higher body temperature and they can detect pregnant females [6,46]. Therefore, in this study, it was necessary to fix the temperature of the experimental membrane feeder to 37 °C and the blood group (O+) for both male and female human volunteers’ blood during the experiments. In addition, human female blood differs from that of the male in viscosity, salt contents, and hematocrit, which could contribute to the variations in mosquito feeding preferences and digestion rate [45,46]. These differences may explain the differences in DNA quantities and, consequently, the STR profiling reported in the study, as the blood meal from human female blood yielded a partial profile up to 48 h post-feeding compared to 36 h for that of human male blood.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study provides evidence supporting Cx. pipiens L. mosquitoes as a possible candidate for providing forensically valid human DNA as hard evidence that may aid the crime investigators in identifying persons and decoding ambiguous crimes. Mixed blood meals taken from humans and animals may have contributed to maximizing DNA degradation and consequently affected the STR identification. Thus, despite the potentially degraded DNA revealed in this study at 48 h post-feeding, it was possible to record profiles with a forensically valuable number of STR loci up to 36 h post-feeding in the examined blood meals. It is preferable for technicians to collect as many blood-fed mosquitoes as possible from a crime scene in order to maximize the recovery of human-specific DNA from their blood meals. This would increase the possibility of producing complete DNA profiles, aid in the identification of a potential offender, and/or exclude a suspect.

Author Contributions

Data curation, A.M.A. (Amani Mohammed Alotaibi); Formal analysis, A.M.A. (Amani Mohammed Alotaibi) and S.A.A.; Funding acquisition, A.M.A. (Ashraf Mohamed Ahmed); Investigation, W.S.A.-Q., F.T. and S.A.A.; Methodology, A.M.A. (Amani Mohammed Alotaibi), W.S.A.-Q. and S.A.A.; Project administration, S.A.A.; Resources, A.M.A. (Ashraf Mohamed Ahmed); Software, A.M.A. (Ashraf Mohamed Ahmed) and S.A.A.; Supervision, S.A.A.; Validation, A.M.A. (Ashraf Mohamed Ahmed) and W.S.A.-Q.; Writing—original draft, A.M.A. (Amani Mohammed Alotaibi), W.S.A.-Q. and S.A.A.; Writing—review and editing, A.M.A. (Ashraf Mohamed Ahmed) and F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2023R695), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Naif Arab University for Security Sciences (code: Nauss-Rec-23-01).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data pertinent to this work are presented in the paper. Any requests should be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We thank Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2023R695), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for funding this research. The authors also thank the Department of Forensic Sciences, College of Criminal Justice, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for using the forensic facilities and instruments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Damelio, R.; Gardner, R.M. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: With an Introduction to Crime Scene Reconstruction; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Virkler, K.; Lednev, I.K. Analysis of body fluids for forensic purposes: From laboratory testing to non-destructive rapid confirmatory identification at a crime scene. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 188, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Curic, G.; Hercog, R.; Vrselja, Z.; Wagner, J. Identification of person and quantification of human DNA recovered from mosquitoes (Culicidae). Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014, 8, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Attardo, G.M.; Hansen, I.A.; Raikhel, A.S. Nutritional regulation of vitellogenesis in mosquitoes: Implications for anautogeny. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 35, 661–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Clements, A.N. The Biology of Mosquitoes. Volume 1: Development, Nutrition and Reproduction; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992; ISBN 987-184-53242-8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lehane, M.J. The Biology of Blood-Sucking in Insects, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 321. ISBN 978-0-521-83608-1. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chadee, D.D.; Beier, J.C. Factors influencing the duration of blood-feeding by laboratory-reared and wild Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Trinidad, West Indies. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1997, 91, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Edman, J.; Scott, T.; Costero, A.; Morrison, A.; Harrington, L.; Clark, G. Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) movement influenced by availability of oviposition sites. J. Med. Entomol. 1998, 35, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rabêlo, K.; Albuquerque, C.; Tavares, V.; Santos, S.; Souza, C.; Oliveira, T.; Oliveira, N.; Crovella, S. Trace samples of human blood in mosquitoes as a forensic investigation tool. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 14847–14856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Trájer, A.J. Which mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are candidates for DNA extraction in forensic practice? J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2018, 58, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Spitaleri, S.; Romano, C.; Di Luise, E.; Ginestra, E.; Saravo, L. Genotyping of human DNA recovered from mosquitoes found on a crime scene. Int. Congr. Ser. 2006, 1288, 574–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rabêlo, K.; Albuquerque, C.; Tavares, V.; Santos, S.; Souza, C.; Oliveira, T.; Moura, R.; Brandão, L.; Crovella, S. Detecting multiple DNA human profile from a mosquito blood meal. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, gmr.15037547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Scott, T.W.; Githeko, A.K.; Fleisher, A.; Harrington, L.C.; Yan, G. DNA profiling of human blood in anophelines from lowland and highland sites in western Kenya. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2006, 75, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gray, S.L.; Tiedge, T.M.; Butkus, J.M.; Earp, T.J.; Lindner, S.E.; Roy, R. Determination of human identity from Anopheles stephensi mosquito blood meals using direct amplification and massively parallel sequencing. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020, 48, 102347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Butler, J.M. Forensic DNA Typing: Biology, Technology, and Genetics of STR Markers, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: London, UK, 2005; ISBN 0-12-147952-8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hiroshige, Y.; Hara, M.; Nagai, A.; Hikitsuchi, T.; Umeda, M.; Kawajiri, Y.; Nakayama, K.; Suzuki, K.; Takada, A.; Ishii, A. A human genotyping trial to estimate the post-feeding time from mosquito blood meals. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kreike, J.; Kampfer, S. Isolation and characterization of human DNA from mosquitoes (Culicidae). Int. J. Leg. Med. 1999, 112, 380–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. MacDougall, C. Effect of Blood Meal Size on Mosquito Response to Disturbance While Blood Feeding on a Simulated Host. Master’s Thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Bumaby, BC, Canada, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ibrahim, A.M. Impact of adult age on forensic use of Culex pipiens mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae). Int. J. Mosq. Res. 2015, 2, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  20. Swaran, Y.C.; Welch, L. A comparison between direct PCR and extraction to generate DNA profiles from samples retrieved from various substrates. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012, 6, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Videvall, E.; Strandh, M.; Engelbrecht, A.; Cloete, S.; Cornwallis, C.K. Direct PCR offers a fast and reliable alternative to conventional DNA isolation methods for gut microbiomes. MSystems 2017, 2, e00132-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Van Oorschot, R.A.; Ballantyne, K.N.; Mitchell, R.J. Forensic trace DNA: A review. Investig. Genet. 2010, 1, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ahmed, A.M.; Maingon, R.; Taylor, P.; Hurd, H. The effects of infection with Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis on the reproductive fitness of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 1999, 36, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. List, I.S. SOP: Blood Collection in the Mouse, Intracardiac. Va. Tech LACUC Univ. Vet. Anim. Resour. 2017, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  25. Boix, F.; Andersen, J.M.; Mørland, J. Pharmacokinetic modeling of subcutaneous heroin and its metabolites in blood and brain of mice. Addict. Biol. 2013, 18, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baeshen, R.; Ekechukwu, N.E.; Toure, M.; Paton, D.; Coulibaly, M.; Traoré, S.F.; Tripet, F. Differential effects of inbreeding and selection on male reproductive phenotype associated with the colonization and laboratory maintenance of Anopheles gambiae. Malar. J. 2014, 13, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Briegel, H.; Lea, A.O. Influence of the endocrine system on tryptic activity in female Aedes aegypti. J. Insect Physiol. 1979, 25, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hopwood, J.A.; Ahmed, A.M.; Polwart, A.; Williams, G.T.; Hurd, H. Malaria-induced apoptosis in mosquito ovaries: A mechanism to control vector egg production. J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 204, 2773–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Houseman, J.G.; Downe, A. Methods of measuring blood meal size and proteinase activity for determining effects of mated state on digestive processes of female Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Can. Entomol. 1986, 118, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Konishi, E. Size of blood meals of Aedes albopictus and Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) feeding on an unrestrained dog infected with Dirofilaria immitis (Spirurida: Filariidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1989, 26, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Oostdik, K.; Lenz, K.; Nye, J.; Schelling, K.; Yet, D.; Bruski, S.; Strong, J.; Buchanan, C.; Sutton, J.; Linner, J. Developmental validation of the PowerPlex® Fusion System for analysis of casework and reference samples: A 24-locus multiplex for new database standards. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014, 12, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Butler, J.M.; Hill, C.R. Biology and genetics of new autosomal STR loci useful for forensic DNA analysis. Forensic Sci. Rev. 2012, 24, 15. [Google Scholar]
  33. Byrd, J.H.; Tomberlin, J.K. Forensic Entomology: The Utility of Arthropods in Legal Investigations, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-0-815-35016-3. Available online: https://books.google.com.sa/books?id=HFG6qQeCY-8C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 10 May 2023).
  34. Mumcuoglu, K.Y.; Gallili, N.; Reshef, A.; Brauner, P.; Grant, H. Use of human lice in forensic entomology. J. Med. Entomol. 2004, 41, 803–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schal, C.; Czado, N.; Gamble, R.; Barrett, A.; Weathers, K.; Lodhi, K.M. Isolation, identification, and time course of human DNA typing from bed bugs, Cimex lectularius. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018, 293, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Atoni, E.; Zhao, L.; Karungu, S.; Obanda, V.; Agwanda, B.; Xia, H.; Yuan, Z. The discovery and global distribution of novel mosquito-associated viruses in the last decade (2007–2017). Rev. Med. Virol. 2019, 29, e2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Greenberg, J.A.; DiMenna, M.A.; Hanelt, B.; Hofkin, B.V. Analysis of post-blood meal flight distances in mosquitoes utilizing zoo animal blood meals. J. Vector Ecol. 2012, 37, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Norris, L.C.; Fornadel, C.M.; Hung, W.-C.; Pineda, F.J.; Norris, D.E. Frequency of multiple blood meals taken in a single gonotrophic cycle by Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Macha, Zambia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010, 83, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Demeke, T.; Eng, M.; Holigroski, M.; Lee, S.-J. Effect of amount of DNA on Digital PCR assessment of genetically engineered canola and soybean events. Food Anal. Methods 2021, 14, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Budowle, B.; Moretti, T.R.; Niezgoda, S.J.; Brown, B.L. CODIS and PCR-based short tandem repeat loci: Law enforcement tools. In Second European Symposium on Human Identification; Promega Corporation: Madison, WI, USA, 1998; Volume 7388. [Google Scholar]
  41. Martínez-de la Puente, J.; Ruiz, S.; Soriguer, R.; Figuerola, J. Effect of blood meal digestion and DNA extraction protocol on the success of blood meal source determination in the malaria vector Anopheles atroparvus. Malar. J. 2013, 12, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Steffen, C.R.; Coble, M.D.; Gettings, K.B.; Vallone, P.M. Corrigendum to ‘US population data for 29 autosomal STR loci. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017, 31, e36–e40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Oshaghi, M.A.; Chavshin, A.R.; Vatandoost, H. Analysis of mosquito bloodmeals using RFLP markers. Exp. Parasitol. 2006, 114, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ibrahim, Y.; Hussain, S.M.; Alnasser, S.; Almohandes, H.; Sarhandi, I. Patterns and sociodemographic characteristics of substance abuse in Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study at a psychiatric rehabilitation center. Ann. Saudi Med. 2018, 38, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brouwer, R. Variations in human body odour as a cause of individual differences of attraction for malaria mosquitoes. Trop. Geogr. Med. 1960, 12, 186–192. [Google Scholar]
  46. Brady, J.; Costantini, C.; Sagnon, N.; Gibson, G.; Coluzzi, M. The role of body odours in the relative attractiveness of different men to malarial vectors in Burkina Faso. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1997, 91, S121–S122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 14 00467 g001 550
Figure 1. DNA concentration (ng/μL) extracted from the blood meals of the six experimental mosquito groups at different time intervals post-feeding.
Figure 1. DNA concentration (ng/μL) extracted from the blood meals of the six experimental mosquito groups at different time intervals post-feeding.
Insects 14 00467 g001
Insects 14 00467 g002a 550Insects 14 00467 g002b 550
Figure 2. (a). STR profile from the blood meal of “G1” (taken from human male blood) at 12 h post-feeding. (b). STR profile from the blood meal of “G1” (taken from human male blood) at 24 h post-feeding). (c). STR profile from the blood meal of “G1” (taken from human male blood) at 36 h post-feeding. (d). STR profile from the blood meal of “G1” (taken from human male blood) at 48 h post-feeding.
Figure 2. (a). STR profile from the blood meal of “G1” (taken from human male blood) at 12 h post-feeding. (b). STR profile from the blood meal of “G1” (taken from human male blood) at 24 h post-feeding). (c). STR profile from the blood meal of “G1” (taken from human male blood) at 36 h post-feeding. (d). STR profile from the blood meal of “G1” (taken from human male blood) at 48 h post-feeding.
Insects 14 00467 g002aInsects 14 00467 g002b
Table
Table 1. Mean concentrations (ng/μL) and cycle threshold values of the DNA extracted from the blood meals of the six experimental mosquito groups at different time intervals post-feeding compared to the control samples.
Table 1. Mean concentrations (ng/μL) and cycle threshold values of the DNA extracted from the blood meals of the six experimental mosquito groups at different time intervals post-feeding compared to the control samples.
Hours
Post-Feeding		Mosquito Groups (Based on the Source of Blood Meals)
G1 G2G3G4G5G6
CCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCT
01.252 ± 0.00129.911.305 ± 0.00129.031.736 ± 0.00128.081.298 ± 0.000529.691.255 ± 0.00529.871.042 ± 0.00431.36
20.661 ± 0.00132.280.959 ± 0.0131.980.963 ± 0.00231.960.574 ± 0.00532.340.545 ± 0.00632.380.44 ± 0.01132.51
40.656 ± 0.00232.290.604 ± 0.00232.280.623 ± 0.00632.280.229 ± 0.00133.770.211 ± 0.000533.790.192 ± 0.000533.85
60.486 ± 0.00632.310.288 ± 0.00533.460.457 ± 0.00232.490.218 ± 0.00133.760.19 ± 0.00533.830.092 ± 0.00135.03
80.217 ± 0.00133.780.278 ± 0.00133.490.309 ± 0.00133.430.197 ± 0.00233.840.161 ± 0.00533.920.085 ± 0.00335.24
100.145 ± 0.00533.980.189 ± 0.00533.850.211 ± 0.00633.790.134 ± 0.00333.990.111 ± 0.00634.020.063 ± 0.00135.12
120.129 ± 0.000533.100.147 ± 0.00133.990.154 ± 0.00533.970.098 ± 0.000535.080.077 ± 0.00135.110.056 ± 0.00135.13
240.094 ± 0.00135.100.112 ± 0.00134.020.118 ± 0.00133.870.052 ± 0.00135.150.039 ± 0.000535.250.019 ± 0.000535.45
360.05 ± 0.00535.190.094 ± 0.00235.110.091 ± 0.000535.140.086 ± 0.000535.140.003 ± 0.000538.880.001 ± 0.0044.18
480.004 ± 0.000538.860.007 ± 0.00138.840.008 ± 0.000538.830.007 ± 0.000538.840.002 ± 0.0039.160.001 ± 0.0044.21
Control144.4 * ± 0.3422.1241.8 * ± 1.0321.8288.2 * ± 0.6921.3237.99 * ± 1.1421.860.001 * ± 0.0044.21145.1 * ± 0.622.14
C: Concentration; CT: Cycle threshold; G1: Group 1; G2: Group 2; G3: Group 3; G4: Group 4; G5: Group 5, and G6: Group 6; * significantly higher compared to that of experimental group (p ≤ 0.05, Students t-Test, n = 3).
Table
Table 2. DNA genotyping for 23 STR loci and Amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from human male blood (G1) at different time intervals post-feeding.
Table 2. DNA genotyping for 23 STR loci and Amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from human male blood (G1) at different time intervals post-feeding.
STR LociHours Post-Blood Feeding
0 h2 h4 h6 h8 h10 h12 h24 h36 h48 hControl
AmelogeninXYXYXYXYXYXYXYN/AN/AN/AXY
D3S135815,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,16N/AN/A15,16
D1S165615,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.3N/AN/A15,16.3
D2S44110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/AN/A10,11
D10S124814,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,15N/AN/AN/A14,15
D13S31711,1311,1311,1311,1311,1311,1311,13N/AN/AN/A11,13
Penta E16,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,18N/AN/AN/A16,18
D16S53910,1210,1210,1210,1210,1210,1210,1210,12N/AN/A10,12
D18S5113,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,13N/A13,13
D2S133817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,18N/AN/AN/A17,18
CSF1PO10,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/AN/AN/A10,11
Penta D9,159,159,159,159,159,159,15N/AN/AN/A9,15
TH017,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.3N/AN/A7,9.3
vWA18,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,19N/AN/A18,19
D21S1129,3029,3029,3029,3029,3029,3029,30N/AN/AN/A29,30
D7S82010,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/AN/AN/A10,11
D5S81812,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,13N/AN/AN/A12,13
TPOX9,119,119,119,119,119,119,11N/AN/AN/A11,11
DYS39111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,11N/AN/A11,11
D8S117912,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,12N/A12,12
D12S39120,2520,2520,2520,2520,2520,2520,2520,25N/AN/A20,25
D19S43313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,13N/AN/A13,13
FGA21,2621,2621,2621,2621,2621,2621,26N/A21,26N/A21,26
D22S104515,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,16N/AN/AN/A15,16
N/A: No results.
Table
Table 3. DNA genotyping for 22 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from human female blood (G2) at different time intervals post-feeding.
Table 3. DNA genotyping for 22 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from human female blood (G2) at different time intervals post-feeding.
STR LociHours Post-Blood Feeding
024681012243648Control
AmelogeninXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
D3S135817,1717,1717,1717,1717,1717,1717,1717,1717,1717,1717,17
D1S165615.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.3
D2S44110,1410,1410,1410,1410,1410,1410,1410,1410,1410,1410,14
D10S124813,1413,1413,1413,1413,1413,1413,1413,1413,1413,1413,14
D13S31712,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,14
Penta E16,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,18
D16S5399,109,109,109,109,109,109,109,109,109,109,10
D18S5113,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,16
D2S133817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,18
CSF1PO10,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/A10,11
Penta D9,169,169,169,169,169,169,169,169,169,169,16
TH016,76,76,76,76,76,76,76,76,76,76,7
vWA18,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,19
D21S1130,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.2
D7S82011,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,11
D5S81812,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,14
TPOX9,119,119,119,119,119,119,119,119,119,119,11
D8S117914,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,15
D12S39123,2323,2323,2323,2323,2323,2323,2323,2323,2323,2323,23
D19S43312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,13
FGA21,2321,2321,2321,2321,2321,2321,2321,2321,2321,2321,23
D22S104515,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,16
N/A: No results.
Table
Table 4. DNA genotyping for 23 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from mixed human male-human female blood (G3) at different time intervals post-feeding.
Table 4. DNA genotyping for 23 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from mixed human male-human female blood (G3) at different time intervals post-feeding.
STR LociHours Post-Blood Feeding
0 h2 h4 h6 h8 h10 h12 h24 h36 h48 hControl
AmelogeninXX,YXX,YXXYXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YN/AXX,Y
D3S135815,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,17N/A15,16,17
D1S165615,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3, 16.3N/A15,15.3,16.3
D2S44110,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,14N/A10,11,14
D10S124813,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,15N/A13,14,15
D13S31711,12,13,1411,12,13,1411,12,13,1411,12,13,1411,12,13,1411,12,13,1411,12,13,1411,12,13,1411,12,13,14N/A11,12,13,14
Penta E16,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,18N/A16,18
D16S5399,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,12N/A9,10,12
D18S5113,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,16N/A13,16
D2S133817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,18N/A17,18
CSF1PO10,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/A10,11
Penta D9,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,16N/A9,15,16
TH016,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.39,15,16N/A6,7,9.3
vWA18,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,19N/AN/A18,19
D21S1129,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.218,19N/A29,30,32.2
D7S82010,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/A10,11
D5S81812,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,14N/A12,13,14
TPOX9,119,119,119,119,119,119,119,119,11N/A9,11
DYS3917,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117, N/AN/A7,11
D8S117912,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,15N/A12,14,15
D12S39120,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,25N/A20,23,25
D19S43312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,13N/A12,13
FGA21,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,26N/A21,23,26
D22S104515,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,16N/A15,16
N/A: No results.
Table
Table 5. DNA genotyping for 23 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from mixed male-mouse blood (G4) at different time intervals post-feeding.
Table 5. DNA genotyping for 23 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from mixed male-mouse blood (G4) at different time intervals post-feeding.
STR LociHours Post-Blood Feeding
0 h2 h4 h6 h8 h10 h12 h24 h36 h48 hControl
AmelogeninXYXYXYXYXYXYXYXYN/AN/AXY
D3S135815,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,16N/AN/A15,16
D1S165615,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.315,16.3N/AN/A15,16.3
D2S44110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/AN/A10,11
D10S124814,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,15N/AN/A14,15
D13S31711,1311,1311,1311,1311,1311,1311,1311,13N/AN/A11,13
Penta E16,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,18N/AN/A16,18
D16S53910,1210,1210,1210,1210,1210,1210,1210,12N/AN/A10,12
D18S5113,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,13
D2S133817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,18N/AN/A17,18
CSF1PO10,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/AN/A10,11
Penta D9,159,159,159,159,159,159,159,15N/AN/A9,15
TH017,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.37,9.3N/AN/A7,9.3
vWA18,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,19N/AN/A18,19
D21S1129,3029,3029,3029,3029,3029,3029,3029,30N/AN/A29,30
D7S82010,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/AN/A10,11
D5S81812,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,13N/AN/A12,13
TPOX9,119,119,119,119,119,119,119,11N/AN/A11,11
DYS39111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,11N/AN/A11,11
D8S117912,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,1212,12
D12S39120,2520,2520,2520,2520,2520,2520,2520,2520,2520,2520,25
D19S43313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,1313,13
FGA21,2621,2621,2621,2621,2621,2621,2621,2621,2621,2621,26
D22S104515,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,16N/AN/A16,16
N/A: No results.
Table
Table 6. DNA genotyping for 22 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from mixed human female-mouse blood (G5) at different time intervals post-feeding.
Table 6. DNA genotyping for 22 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from mixed human female-mouse blood (G5) at different time intervals post-feeding.
STR LociHours Post-Blood Feeding
024681012243648Control
AmelogeninXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXN/AN/AXX
D3S135817,1717,1717,1717,1717,1717,1717,1717,17N/AN/A17,17
D1S165615.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.315.3,16.3N/AN/A15.3,16.3
D2S44110,1410,1410,1410,1410,1410,1410,1410,14N/AN/A10,14
D10S124813,1413,1413,1413,1413,1413,1413,1413,14N/AN/A13,14
D13S31712,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,14N/AN/A12,14
Penta E16,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,18N/AN/AN/A16,18
D16S5399,109,109,109,109,109,109,109,10N/AN/A9,10
D18S5113,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,16N/AN/A13,16
D2S133817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,18N/AN/A17,18
CSF1PO10,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/AN/A10,11
Penta D9,169,169,169,169,169,169,169, N/AN/AN/A9,16
TH016,76,76,76,76,76,76,76,7N/AN/A6,7
vWA18,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,19N/AN/A18,19
D21S1130,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.230,32.2N/AN/A30,32.2
D7S82011,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,1111,11N/AN/A11,11
D5S81812,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,1412,14N/AN/A12,14
TPOX9,119,119,119,119,119,119,119,11N/AN/A9,11
D8S117914,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,1514,15N/AN/A14,15
D12S39123,2323,2323,2323,2323,2323,2323,2323,23N/AN/A23,23
D19S43312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312, N/AN/A12,13
FGA21,2321,2321,2321,2321,2321,2321,2321,2323, N/AN/A21,23
D22S104515,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,16N/AN/AN/A15,16
N/A: No results.
Table
Table 7. DNA genotyping for 23 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from mixed human male-human female-mouse blood (G6) at different time intervals post-feeding.
Table 7. DNA genotyping for 23 STR loci and amelogenin obtained from mosquito blood meals taken from mixed human male-human female-mouse blood (G6) at different time intervals post-feeding.
STR LociHours Post-Blood Feeding
024681012243648Control
AmelogeninXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,YXX,Y
D3S135815,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,1715,16,17N/A15,16,17
D1S165615,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15.3,16.315,15,16.3N/A15,15.3,16.3
D2S44110,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,1410,11,14N/A10,11,14
D10S124813,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,1513,14,15N/A13,14,15
D13S31711,12,13,1411,12,13, 1411,12,13, 1411,12,13, 1411,12,13, 1411,12,13, 1411,12,13, 1411,12,13, 1411,12,13,14N/A11,12,13, 14
Penta E16,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,1816,18N/AN/A16,18
D16S5399,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,129,10,12N/AN/A9,10,12
D18S5113,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,1613,16N/AN/A13,16
D2S133817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,1817,18N/AN/A17,18
CSF1PO10,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/AN/A10,11
Penta D9,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,169,15,169,15, N/AN/AN/A9,15,16
TH016,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.36,7,9.3N/AN/A6,7,9.3
vWA18,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,1918,19N/AN/A18,19
D21S1129,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.229,30,32.2N/AN/A29,30,32.2
D7S82010,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,1110,11N/AN/A10,11
D5S81811,12,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,1412,13,14N/AN/A12,13,14
TPOX9,119,119,119,119,119,119,119,11N/AN/A9,11
DYS3917,117,117,117,117,117,117,117, N/AN/AN/A7,11
D8S117912,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,1512,14,15N/AN/A12,14,15
D12S39120,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,2520,23,25N/AN/A20,23,25
D19S43312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,1312,13N/AN/A12,13
FGA21,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,2621,23,26N/AN/A21,23,26
D22S104515,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,1615,16N/AN/A15,16
N/A: No results.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmed, A.M.; Alotaibi, A.M.; Al-Qahtani, W.S.; Tripet, F.; Amer, S.A. Forensic DNA Analysis of Mixed Mosquito Blood Meals: STR Profiling for Human Identification. Insects 2023, 14, 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050467

AMA Style

Ahmed AM, Alotaibi AM, Al-Qahtani WS, Tripet F, Amer SA. Forensic DNA Analysis of Mixed Mosquito Blood Meals: STR Profiling for Human Identification. Insects. 2023; 14(5):467. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050467

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmed, Ashraf Mohamed, Amani Mohammed Alotaibi, Wedad Saeed Al-Qahtani, Frederic Tripet, and Sayed Amin Amer. 2023. "Forensic DNA Analysis of Mixed Mosquito Blood Meals: STR Profiling for Human Identification" Insects 14, no. 5: 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050467

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop