Next Article in Journal
Expression of Molecular Markers of Resilience against Varroa destructor and Bee Viruses in Ethiopian Honey Bees (Apis mellifera simensis) Focussing on Olfactory Sensing and the RNA Interference Machinery
Next Article in Special Issue
Prospects for Biological Control of Macadamia Felted Coccid in Hawaii with Metaphycus macadamiae Polaszek & Noyes, a New Encyrtid Wasp Native to New South Wales, Australia
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Application of Black Soldier Fly Larva Bins in Treating Food Waste
Previous Article in Special Issue
Medfly Population Suppression through Augmentative Release of an Introduced Parasitoid in an Irrigated Multi-Fruit Orchard of Central–Western Argentina
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimizing Mass Rearing of the Egg Parasitoid, Telenomus podisi, for Control of the Brown Stink Bug, Euschistus heros

by
Letícia Martins Parra
1,
José Romário de Carvalho
2,
William Wyatt Hoback
3,* and
Regiane Cristina de Oliveira
1
1
Crop Protection Department, School of Agronomic Sciences, São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (FCA/UNESP), Botucatu 18610034, SP, Brazil
2
Department of Natural Sciences, State Secretary of Education of Espírito Santo, Guaçui 29560000, ES, Brazil
3
Noble Research Center, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(5), 435; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050435
Submission received: 1 April 2023 / Revised: 25 April 2023 / Accepted: 28 April 2023 / Published: 3 May 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Biological control programs are used to effectively manage pests in a more sustainable way, such as the case of the microwasp parasitoid Telenomus podisi for managing eggs of the brown stink bug Euschistus heros, a key pest in South American soybean. A biological control program requires continuous production of the parasitoids and thus, artificial diets and freezing of host eggs are necessary. We evaluated the parasitism capacity of T. podisi reared on fresh or previously frozen eggs from E. heros fed on natural or two artificial diets. Seven constant temperatures were tested for each condition. We measured biological parameters of wasps and the rates of parasitism. We found that 24 °C had better parasitism and viability parameters, and was most-favorable to T. podisi production. We also found that both tested artificial diets for E. heros produced eggs that support mass rearing of this egg parasitoid.

Abstract

The parasitoid Telenomus podisi Ashmead, 1893 is used in biological control programs in Brazil against eggs of Euschistus heros (Fabricius, 1798), a key pest of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. To optimize the mass production of parasitoids, artificial diets and storage of host eggs at low temperatures have been developed; however, direct comparisons of the effects of these conditions have not occurred. We assessed a double factorial arrangement composed of six treatments (fresh or cryopreserved E. heros eggs from adults fed on natural or two artificial diets). We evaluated the biological characteristics and parasitism capacity of T. podisi produced from these treatments across seven temperatures. The thermal range between 21 and 30 °C resulted in satisfactory daily parasitism in all treatments tested, with an inverse relationship between temperature and female survival. The best parasitoid biological parameters were found between 21 and 27 °C, where all tested diets supported T. podisi development, with the best results from artificial diets. Fresh eggs and those frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −196 °C until use supported parasitoid development. These results suggest that the best method to mass rear T. podisi is to use artificial diets to rear E. heros and store eggs until needed, and then rear parasitoids at 24 °C.

1. Introduction

The brown stink bug, Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), is one of the key pests in soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., grown in Brazil. As a piercing-sucking insect, it is able to feed on both the plant and the grains, which can cause indirect damage to the plants and direct damage to yields [1]. It is a neotropical pentatomid and due to the increase in global temperature in the past decades, E. heros attacks soybean crops across Brazil [2].
The majority of producers still exclusively use chemical control for managing E. heros [3]. Although chemical control is one of the pillars of Integrated Pest Management (IPM), it should be used as the last management tactic, always based on pest monitoring, and following the recommended dose and rotating mode of action. Unfortunately, the traditional culture of the producers and the lack of different compounds for the management of pentatomids has resulted in overuse of chemical pesticides and widespread insecticide resistance [4]. In addition, over reliance on chemical pesticides has caused a decrease in natural enemies, environmental damage, and an increase in production costs [5,6].
The use of biological control has been increasing for pest management in crops as a way to reduce the use of pesticides and increase the sustainability of the agroecosystem, while preventing economic damage [7]. The egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) has been shown to be effective in managing populations of E. heros, the preferred host [8]. By parasitizing the egg stage, it has advantages in preventing the establishment and feeding damage of the pest [9]. Currently, around 60,000 hectares of soybean in Brazil are managed for E. heros with the release of T. podisi, with potential for expansion in the coming years [3,10].
For the release of T. podisi to occur effectively, a sufficient amount of parasitoids must be produced in specialized biofactories. However, the production of T. podisi requires substantial labor since the shelf life of natural enemies is low. An additional challenge is that, in most cases, the parasitoids are used at specific times of the year, depending on the planting cycle of each crop [11,12]. Large-scale insect rearing aims to reduce costs and increase production without reducing parasitoid quality [13,14]. Currently, techniques using artificial diets [15,16,17] and storage of host eggs at low temperatures [11,18,19] help in reducing rearing costs. Parasitoids also require hosts eggs with good quality and sufficient nutritional value [20]. Consequently, the egg aspect and content of nutrients in mass rearing are essential for parasitism, providing enough parasitoids for field release.
The development of research in quality control of T. podisi is still new in Brazil, as the commercialization of this parasitoid was only registered in 2019 [21]. The reproductive rates of parasitoids are the basis for evaluating the control potential of a species as a biological control agent applied with inundative releases in the field [22]. Biological parameters, including sex ratio and viability, can also affect the success of parasitism in the field [23]. In addition, climate conditions strongly influence insect physiological development, migration, and dispersal [24]. Therefore, studies to optimize rearing of T. podisi based on biological attributes and rearing temperature are essential to understand the main requirements of this natural enemy, improving mass production with satisfactory quality to manage pests in the field [23].
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the parasitism capacity, thermal requirements, and biological characteristics of T. podisi that emerged from E. heros eggs. Eggs were obtained from adult stink bugs fed with different diets and used fresh or stored eggs that were frozen in liquid nitrogen. All conditions were tested at different temperatures (15 ± 2, 18 ± 2, 21 ± 2, 24 ± 2, 27 ± 2, 30 ± 2, and 33 ± 2 °C). Our work provides new information for T. podisi rearing to assist in the success of biological control programs against E. heros in Brazil and elsewhere.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rearing of E. heros with Natural and Artificial Diets

The rearing of E. heros was carried out at the Laboratory of the Research Group on Integrated Pest Management in Agriculture (AGRIMIP), located at the School of Agricultural Sciences (FCA/UNESP) in the municipality of Botucatu (22°50′42″ S 48°26′03.9″ W), maintained under controlled conditions of light (14 h of photophase), relative humidity (70 ± 10%), and temperature (25 ± 2 °C).
Adult and third-stage nymphs of E. heros were kept in plastic cages (25 × 25 × 12 cm) covered with voile fabric to allow for ventilation. Raw cotton strips were provided in the adult cages as substrate for copulation, walking, and oviposition. As a food source, a natural or artificial diet was provided to the insects, depending on the bioassays to be performed. The natural diet consisted of 10 green bean pods (Phaseulus vulgaris L.) and 20 grains of raw peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) per cage. In artificial diet cages (Table 1), 10 pieces of 1 cm2 of the diet were offered in each box. The artificial diets were created by grinding the ingredients in a grain grinder and, in sequence, in a homemade processor. The ingredients were homogenized and the diets were placed into aluminum foil, and then baked in an oven at 60 °C for 3 h to dry. As a source of water, cotton soaked in filtered water was offered in the rearing cages.
Every 2 days, the eggs of E. heros were removed from the cages and placed in plastic dishes (60 × 12 mm) for hatching of the nymphs, to maintain the laboratory colony or were used for the bioassays. For comparisons with fresh eggs, 1 mL of eggs (1000 eggs on average) from each type of diet was wrapped in aluminum foil, closed with adhesive tape, and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen (−196 °C) until the beginning of the bioassay.

2.2. Rearing of T. podisi

The rearing of T. podisi was carried out in the same place as the rearing of E. heros, under the same controlled laboratory conditions. About 5 mL of fresh E. heros eggs were glued with nontoxic white glue onto cardboard (8 × 10 cm), placed in 3-liter plastic pots, covered with plastic film and elastic, allowing for parasitism for 5 days. As a food source, pure honey was rubbed on the sides of the pots. This procedure was carried out once a week to continue the rearing of T. podisi and to supply parasitoid females for bioassays.

2.3. Parasitism Capacity and Thermal Requirements of T. podisi in E. heros Eggs from Different Diets

To assess the parasitism capacity of T. podisi, a paper card (1 × 7 cm) was created with 20 eggs of E. heros for each replication of the six treatments described below. Cards were transferred to glass tubes (2 × 8 cm). Each treatment had five replications, forming a double factorial scheme, with eggs from six different conditions (natural and two artificial diets, each cryopreserved or fresh) tested at seven different temperatures: 15 ± 2, 18 ± 2, 21 ± 2, 24 ± 2, 27 ± 2, 30 ± 2, and 33 ± 2 °C. The treatments consisted of: T1: Fresh eggs of E. heros from natural diet; T2: Cryopreserved eggs of E. heros from natural diet; T3: Fresh eggs of E. heros from artificial diet 1 (AD1); T4: Cryopreserved eggs of E. heros from AD1; T5: Fresh eggs of E. heros from artificial diet 2 (AD2); T6: Cryopreserved eggs of E. heros from AD2.
One female newly emerged and mated of T. podisi was added to each glass tube, a honey droplet was provided as a food source, and the tube was sealed with PVC plastic film. The card with the eggs from each replication of the treatments was changed each 24 h until the female died. When removed, the cards were placed in plastic bags (24 × 4 cm) at the respective temperature in Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) climatic chambers. Parasitism was evaluated (Equation (1)) over the days by the total number of eggs and number of parasitized eggs, which were determined using a stereoscopic microscope (Leica EZ4). The development of T. podisi (egg-adult) was observed from the day of parasitism until emergence.
%   Parasitism = no .   parasitized   eggs × 100 ÷ total   no .   of   eggs
The thermal requirements for T. podisi development in each treatment were based on the parameters of thermal constant (K) and the lower temperature threshold (To), given by the development period time (egg-adult). T. podisi development rates as a function of temperature were calculated using both a linear and a nonlinear model (Briere 1) (Table 2) and the parameters were estimated with the Levenberg–Marquardt method using the minpack.lm package in R 3.5 [25,26]. The most suitable models were selected based on the chi-square test of adherence (χ2), the logarithm of maximum likelihood (LogLik), the sum of squared residuals (RSS), Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and the adjusted coefficient of determination (adjR2). The daily parasitism and accumulated parasitism (calculated by adding daily parasitism rates until the female’s death) were based on the percentage of parasitized eggs (Equation (1)) per day in each tested temperature until female T. podisi death (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6).

2.4. Biological Parameters of T. podisi in E. heros Eggs from Different Diets

The effect of the different diets offered to E. heros and storage conditions of eggs on the biological parameters of T. podisi were evaluated by placing one female parasitoid newly emerged and mated in a glass tube (2 × 8 cm) containing a paper card (1 × 7 cm) with 30 E. heros eggs and six replications. The treatments were composed of the same diets and egg conditions as the parasitism capacity bioassay (T1 to T6), and were also evaluated at seven different temperatures (15 ± 2 to 33 ± 2 °C).
A honey droplet was offered in each glass tube as a food source. After 24 h of parasitism at 25 ± 2 °C, the cards with parasitized eggs of E. heros were removed and placed in plastic bags (24 × 4 cm) at the respective temperatures in BOD climatic chambers. After emergence, 15 adult females and 15 adult males of T. podisi from the eggs in each treatment were stored in 70% alcohol until body length was measured using the software Leica Application Suite-Version 1.6.0. The total number of eggs, number of parasitized eggs, number of eggs with emergence holes, and number of females and males emerged were quantified. With these data, it was possible to evaluate the following biological parameters: Parasitism (Equation (2)), viability (Equation (3)), number of individuals per egg (Equation (4)), and sex ratio (Equation (5)).
Parasitism = no .   parasitized   eggs × 100 ÷ total   no .   of   eggs
Viability = no .   eggs   with   emergence   hole ÷ no .   parasitized   eggs
No .   individuals   per   egg = total   number   of   individuals   ÷ no .   of   eggs   with   emergence   hole
Sex   ratio = n   females ÷ no .   females + males
We carried out a completely randomized exploratory analysis using a 6 × 7 factorial arrangement (diets × temperatures). The means of body length of females and males of T. podisi and the means of parasitism, viability, number of individuals per egg, and sex ratio were tested for homogeneity [29], normality, and independence of variances [30].
To determine the influence of treatments and temperatures, we used a generalized linear model with a Gaussian distribution for the body length parameter, binomial residual distribution for the sex ratio and viability parameters, and a Poisson residual distribution for the parameters of the number of individuals per egg and parasitism, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). All statistical analyses were performed using R 3.5 [26].

3. Results

3.1. Parasitism Capacity of T. podisi in E. heros Eggs from Different Diets

At low temperatures (15 and 18 °C), there was a low or no daily parasitism in the first days of all experiments (T1 to T6). The longest survival of T. podisi females in this thermal range was 25 to 35 days, with accumulated parasitism reaching a plateau over time (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). At 33 °C (highest temperature), a low daily parasitism was also observed in the first days, except for T3 that reached 60% of eggs parasitized. Females also had the lowest survival times of 4 days. Moreover, at 33 °C, no accumulated parasitism was observed.
The thermal range of 21 to 24 °C was the most suitable for T. podisi, with T1 and T3 reaching more than 80% parasitism with other treatments exhibiting 30 to 70% parasitism. The maximum parasitism observed at 27 and 30 °C was 60%, with the exception of T5 at 27 °C, which had more than 80% parasitism. In all treatments, we observed that increases in temperature decreased the rate of daily and accumulated parasitism over time and reduced female survival (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6).
Figure 1. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros fresh eggs reared with natural diet (Treatment 1) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Figure 1. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros fresh eggs reared with natural diet (Treatment 1) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Insects 14 00435 g001
Figure 2. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros cryopreserved eggs reared with natural diet (Treatment 2) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Figure 2. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros cryopreserved eggs reared with natural diet (Treatment 2) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Insects 14 00435 g002
Figure 3. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros fresh eggs reared with artificial diet 1 (Treatment 3) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Figure 3. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros fresh eggs reared with artificial diet 1 (Treatment 3) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Insects 14 00435 g003
Figure 4. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros cryopreserved eggs reared with artificial diet 1 (Treatment 4) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Figure 4. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros cryopreserved eggs reared with artificial diet 1 (Treatment 4) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Insects 14 00435 g004
Figure 5. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros fresh eggs reared with artificial diet 2 (Treatment 5) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Figure 5. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros fresh eggs reared with artificial diet 2 (Treatment 5) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Insects 14 00435 g005
Figure 6. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros cryopreserved eggs reared with artificial diet 2 (Treatment 6) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Figure 6. Daily and accumulated parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi of Euschistus heros cryopreserved eggs reared with artificial diet 2 (Treatment 6) at different temperatures under 70 ± 10% relative humidity and 14:10 h of photoperiod.
Insects 14 00435 g006

3.2. Thermal Requirements of T. podisi in E. heros Eggs from Different Diets

Based on the models’ fit tests, the R2 adjustment was the most suitable for the tested parameters. As shown in Table 2 and Table 3, the To values of each treatment are better fit by the nonlinear model where they are higher than the To obtained by the linear model.
The thermal constant (K) had high variation among treatments, with lower values being observed in T1, T4, and T6 and the highest value in T2 (Table 4). In contrast, adjusted R2 values were higher for T1, T6, T3, and lower for T2 (Table 4). Treatments composed of artificial diets and fresh eggs (T3 and T5) had higher K values compared with those composed of artificial diets and cryopreserved eggs (T4 and T6).
In general, the upper maximum temperature (Tmax) for survival and parasitism ranged from 32 to 34 °C in all treatments (Table 3 and Figure 7). The optimum temperature (Topt) had low variation among egg treatments, with values ranging from 28 to 29 °C (Table 3 and Figure 7). However, the lowest minimum temperature (Tmin) had different values among treatments, with higher values being observed in treatments with fresh eggs (T1 and T3) when compared to cryopreserved eggs (T2 and T4), with the exception of treatments T5 and T6 (Table 3 and Figure 7). All treatments composed of cryopreserved eggs (T2, T4, and T6) resulted in the Tmax of 33 °C (Figure 7)

3.3. Biological Characteristics of T. podisi in E. heros Eggs from Different Diets

There was a significant factorial interaction between eggs from different diets and temperature on body length in females (F = 2.970; df = 15,232; p = 0.000) and males (F = 1.350; df = 10,100; p = 0.040) of T. podisi (Table 5 and Table 6, respectively). For the females, T2 and T5 did not affect size in relation to the tested temperatures. Treatments subjected to temperatures of 27, 30, and 33 °C also did not show significant differences in body length (Table 5). Body length of T. podisi males only showed differences among treatments based on tested temperatures, with differences between T5 and T6 (Table 6). The thermal range between 24 and 27 °C produced the largest body sizes in both females and males.
At 15 and 18 °C, no insects developed. At 33 °C, the parasitoids only emerged from T5 and T6 diets and were only females (Table 5 and Table 6).
There was a significant factorial interaction between diets and temperature for T. podisi parasitism (F = 4.121; df = 30,168; p < 0.001). Overall, the thermal range from 21 to 30 °C showed the best results (Table 7), where 24 °C had better results numerically. At temperatures of 15, 18, and 21 °C, T5 (AD2 and fresh eggs) had statistically better results than the other treatments (Table 7). At other temperatures, treatments composed of artificial diets (T3, T4, T5, and T6) also showed better parasitism results, except at 30 °C. At this temperature, T4, T5, and T6 (artificial diets) and T2 (natural diet with cryopreserved eggs) had similar rates of parasitism (Table 7).
In contrast, viability (F = 55.5807; df = 6205; p < 0.0001 and F = 4.2023; df = 5205; p = 0.0012 for temperature and diet, respectively), number of individuals per egg (F = 18.5349; df = 6205; p < 0.0001 and F = 1.7163; df = 5205; p = 0.1323), and sex ratio (F = 19.2542; df = 6205; p < 0.0001 and F = 2.9260; df = 5205; p = 0.0142) did not show a significant factorial interaction. Similar to parasitism, extreme low (15 and 18 °C) and high temperatures (33 °C) resulted in lower biological performance of the parasitoids, with better results observed in the thermal range from 21 to 30 °C (Table 8, Table 9 and Table 10). The temperature of 24 °C provided the best viability parameter, as well as parasitism rate. In terms of viability and sex ratio, the artificial diets provided better performance compared to the natural diet (Table 8 and Table 10). In the number of individuals per egg parameter, the diets did not influence the results (Table 9).

4. Discussion

The interaction between parasitoid and host depends on many factors, with temperature and egg quality being among the most important parameters that influence parasitism and survival [23,24,31,32]. Temperature directly influences life process in small insects [33]. Our parasitism capacity results show an inverse relationship between temperature and survival period. As observed in most insects, the increase in temperature results in a decreased lifespan. This can be explained by increases in the insect’s metabolic rate at high temperatures and decreased metabolism at low temperatures [34,35]. Similar effects of high temperatures on survivorship and parasitism capacity were found for several other parasitoids species [34,36,37,38,39,40].
In the cases of applied inundative biological control programs, the parasitism capacity is more relevant than the period of time females remain alive in the field [39]. In all treatments, the highest rate of parasitism occurred in the first days (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). This can be explained by the ability of T. podisi to store mature eggs in the ovaries or oviducts, completing oogenesis even before the adult emerges from the host egg [41].
According to the International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) guidelines, ≥80% is accepted as a good parameter of parasitism for the genus Trichogramma [42]. Based on that, the goal of 80% of parasitism was not achieved in most treatments, except for T5 at 27 °C. Species, such as T. podisi, are unable to perform lipogenesis and depend entirely on lipid storage in the larval stage for fecundity and lifespan in the adult stage [33,39,43,44]. In addition, since they cannot synthesize lipids in the adult stage, parasitoids are more vulnerable to temperature increases and pesticides than most pests, including the host E. heros [39,43,45]. Therefore, nutritional aspects are essential for the success in parasitism, and parasitoids tend to choose sources that provide greater energy return [20,46].
Our results showed that artificial diets had better parasitism rates at 15, 18, and 27 °C than treatments with natural diets. These data emphasize the importance of studies on the influence of eggs from hosts reared with artificial diets in the production of parasitoids. Possibly, eggs from artificial diets had superior nutritional quality, resulting in greater parasitism under stressful conditions (thermal extremes), which has not been reported in other studies with artificial diets that examined the biology of T. podisi [16,47]. Future host preference tests and field bioassays should be carried out, in addition to the analysis of egg nutrition, influenced by diet and storage.
Rearing for biological control release also depends on providing parasitoids when host eggs are deposited. The efficiency and development of T. podisi are temperature-dependent, allowing for some storage of adults, and the ability to increase or decrease development [24,32]. From thermal requirement data, given by the thermal constant K (degree-days), upper and lower temperature threshold (Tmax and Tmin), and optimal temperature (Topt), it is possible to estimate the influence of temperature on the parasitoid’s lifespan [48,49], making it possible to optimize the mass production of natural enemies. The hosts (E. heros) and the parasitoids used in this bioassay originate from colonies kept in the laboratory for years, in which the hosts are reared under the same conditions as T1 (natural diet and fresh eggs). Possibly, since they are adapted to this type of diet, they needed less thermal accumulation to complete development and future studies should examine the effects of temperature on successive generations.
The host–parasitoid interaction can be influenced by associative learning over generations, where parasitoids adapt and prefer certain types of hosts due to pre-emergence conditioning established during their larval period [50,51,52]. E. heros, the preferred host for T. podisi, has a K of 327 degree-days [35], which is significantly higher than all treatments. This is a good indication that, in favorable situations in the field, the parasitoid will complete its cycle faster than the host, further contributing to pest management [34,53].
Values of K, Tmin, Tmax, and Topt vary according to the type of host used, species of parasitoid, and adjusted model for the analyses, potentially relating our results to those of other studies [22,34,35,54,55,56,57]. Since T2 presented Tmin of 16 °C and was composed of a natural diet (little variety of ingredients) and cryopreserved eggs, the nutritional aspect of the eggs from this diet was potentially inferior compared to the other treatments, influencing Tmin.
Quality control parameters are essential for mass rearing of insects. This is especially challenging for biological control insects that must be produced as needed to match the crop and target pest. The ability to maintain laboratory colonies and quickly produce the desired number of individuals requires the creation of artificial diet, ways to store host eggs for long periods, and the ability to accelerate or slow down development. These manipulations must not impact the overall quality of the reared insects [7,23,39]. In Europe, there are quality control guidelines for more than 30 species of natural enemies according to the IOBC, but the majority are species not produced in Brazil [42]. However, these guidelines serve as a model for national quality control tests [58,59].
Based on the analysis of biotic factors, including adult size and life history, across rearing temperatures, we can assess the quality of T. podisi for release in the field [60], since the success of this parasitoid release depends on these quality parameters [23,39]. Even though we found significant factorial interaction between the diets and the temperatures tested, there are no expressly significant differences between body length based on the diet and cryopreservation of eggs offered to T. podisi. Body size may be relevant in reducing energy costs [61,62]. Larger insects may reduce movements to search for hosts, are likely to forage in a more heterogeneous environment, interacting with more species, and exhibit greater preferential prey selection than smaller individuals [61,62,63,64]. As only females are responsible for parasitism in the field and differences were found only in body length of females at 21 °C, these data can be useful to improve the success of the parasitoid in biological control programs at this temperature.
Temperature was important in the rearing of T. podisi, since survival was prolonged at lower temperatures. Low temperatures can reduce the insect’s metabolic rate, affecting the viability of parasitized eggs, consequently preventing insect emergence [34,57,65]. The loss of turgidity of the eggs as the temperature increases can prevent the insertion of the parasitoid ovipositor into the egg’s chorion, reducing successful parasitism [39,66].
Considering the release of parasitoids in the field, these results may indicate an important factor in applied biological control programs due to increases in average global temperature, mainly in regions with high thermal amplitude (low temperatures at night and high during the day). Thermal extremes can be harmful to the survival, development, dispersion, and longevity of parasitoids, compromising the efficiency of parasitoid release and management of target pests [24]. With the increase in global temperature, our results of the upper temperature threshold are relevant for mass releases of T. podisi in regions with high temperatures, considering that Topt ranged between 28 and 29 °C. Parasitism rates of 60% were found when T. podisi was reared at 27 and 30 °C, demonstrating that T. podisi is capable of parasitizing more than half of pentatomid eggs soon after release at higher field temperatures [39,43]. Increases in average global temperature tend to negatively affect the distribution of parasitoids more than of hosts, due to lower Topt and Tmax [54,67,68]. In an ideal scenario, delaying the development of parasitoids when field temperatures border on the upper threshold can help in the successful application of biological control. Our results can be useful for biological programs in areas with thermal ranges from 21 to 30 °C, indicating that T. podisi is adapted to these conditions, although field experiments must confirm our results.
The nutritional composition of the egg is also fundamental for the choice and development of the parasitoid [69]. Since AD2 is rich in different types of grains (sunflower seed and wheat germ) compared to the AD1 and the natural diet (Table 1), the E. heros eggs obtained from AD2 likely had a higher nutritional value than the other diets, allowing for the development of parasitoids at high temperatures (33 °C). Future nutritional analysis of diets and eggs should be performed to confirm this assumption. In addition, the production cost of each diet should be analyzed to conclude whether the shift from natural to artificial diet is beneficial.
The artificial diets, especially AD2 with fresh eggs (T5), showed better results than the natural diet, contradicting other studies in which artificial diets did not influence the evaluated parameters of T. podisi [16,47]. Viability and sex ratio had better results with fresh eggs than cryopreserved eggs, possibly due to small changes in the physical-nutritional characteristics caused by low temperatures, causing females to prefer fresh eggs [20]. In order to increase fitness, foraging theory predicts that parasitoids, when searching for host eggs, evaluate and explore the energy content before parasitizing the egg [20,46,70,71]. Several studies have been carried out on the use of cryopreservation in mass rearing of egg parasitoids [11,72,73,74,75]. Although the use of liquid nitrogen to store host eggs is beneficial to maintain a stock throughout the year, our results demonstrated that cold storage affected the biological performance of T. podisi.

5. Conclusions

Based on our results, T. podisi can be mass reared for release in tropical areas. We conclude that the thermal range between 21 and 30 °C presented satisfactory daily and accumulated parasitism in all treatments tested. Similarly, the biological parameters evaluated (body length, parasitism, viability, number of individuals/egg, and sex ratio) showed that rearing temperatures between 21 and 30 °C are favorable for the development of T. podisi. Within this thermal range, all tested diets were favorable for the rearing of the parasitoid from the host with AD2 providing the best quality of parasitoids. As parasitism and viability presented better results at 24 °C and egg parasitoids are generally reared at 25 ± 2 °C in Brazil, we recommend 24 °C to mass rear T. podisi using fresh or cryopreserved E. heros eggs from adults provided AD2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M.P., W.W.H. and R.C.d.O.; methodology, L.M.P.; software, J.R.d.C.; validation, L.M.P., J.R.d.C. and R.C.d.O.; formal analysis, L.M.P. and J.R.d.C.; investigation, L.M.P.; resources, R.C.d.O.; data curation, L.M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.P., J.R.d.C., W.W.H. and R.C.d.O.; writing—review and editing, L.M.P., J.R.d.C., W.W.H. and R.C.d.O.; visualization, L.M.P., J.R.d.C., W.W.H. and R.C.d.O.; supervision, R.C.d.O.; project administration, R.C.d.O.; funding acquisition, R.C.d.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil (CAPES)-funding code 001.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets used or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from Hatch Project accession no. 1019561 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture for financially supporting this research, Carlos Frederico Wilcken and the Laboratório de Controle Biológico de Pragas Florestais (LCBPF–FCA/UNESP) for supporting the evaluations of parasitoids.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bortolotto, O.C.; Pomari-Fernandes, A.; Bueno, R.C.O.F.; Bueno, A.F.; Kruz, Y.K.S.; Queiroz, A.P.; Sanzovo, A.; Ferreira, R.B. The use of soybean integrated pest management in Brazil: A review. Agron. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 1, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Panizzi, A.R. Growing Problems with Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): Species Invasive to the U.S. and Potential Neotropical Invaders. Am. Entomol. 2015, 61, 203–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oliveira, R.C. Utilização de Telenomus podisi no manejo de Euschistus heros. In Controle Biológico com Parasitoides e Predadores na Agricultura Brasileira; Parra, J.R.P., Pinto, A.S., Nava, D.E., Oliveira, R.C., Diniz, A.J.F., Eds.; Fealq: Piracicaba, Brazil, 2021; pp. 235–247. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bueno, A.F.; Carvalho, G.A.; Santos, A.C.; Sosa-Gómez, D.R.; Silva, D.M. Pesticide selectivity to natural enemies: Challenges and constraints for research and field recommendation. Cienc. Rural 2017, 47, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bueno, A.F.; Braz, E.C.; Favetti, B.M.; França-Neto, J.B.; Silva, G.B. Release of the egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi to manage the Neotropical Brown Stink Bug, Euschistus heros, in soybean production. Crop Prot. 2020, 137, 105310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tuelher, E.S.; Silva, E.H.; Rodrigues, H.S.; Hirose, E.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Oliveira, E.E. Area-wide spatial survey of the likelihood of inseticide control failure in the neotropical brown stink bug Euschistus heros. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. van Lenteren, J.C. Controle de qualidade de agentes de controle biológico produzidos massalmente: Conhecimento, desenvolvimento e diretrizes. In Controle Biológico de Pragas: Produção Massal e Controle de Qualidade; Bueno, V.H.P., Ed.; Editora UFLA: Lavras, Brazil, 2000; pp. 21–41. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stecca, C.S.; Bueno, A.F.; Pasini, A.; Silva, D.M.; Andrade, K.; Zirondi Filho, D.M. Impact of Inseticides Used in Soybean Crops to the Egg Parasitoid Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2018, 47, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paz-neto, A.A.; Querino, R.B.; Margaría, C.B. Egg parasitoids of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Coreidae and Pentatomidae) on soybean and cowpea in Brazil. Fla. Entomol. 2015, 98, 929–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parra, J.R.P. Elaboração de programas de controle biológico: Uma visão inter e multidisciplinar. In Controle Biológico com Parasitoides e Predadores na Agricultura Brasileira; Parra, J.R.P., Pinto, A.S., Nava, D.E., Oliveira, R.C., Diniz, A.J.F., Eds.; Fealq: Piracicaba, Brazil, 2021; pp. 39–54. [Google Scholar]
  11. Silva, G.V.; Bueno, A.F.; Favetti, B.M.; Neves, P.M.O.J. Use of Low Temperature Storage to Preserve Host and Parasitoid to Improve the Rearing of Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) on Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2019, 48, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rezaei, M.; Talebi, A.A.; Fathipour, Y.; Karimzadeh, J.; Mehrabadi, M.; Reddy, G.V.P. Effects of cold storage on life-history traits of Aphidius matricariae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2020, 168, 800–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Francuski, L.; Beukeboom, L.W. Insects in production—An introduction. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2020, 168, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gilkeson, L.A. Ecology of rearing: Quality, regulation and mass rearing. In Ecological Interactions and Biological Control; Andow, D.A., Ragsdale, D.A., Nyvall, R.F., Eds.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, USA, 1997; pp. 139–148. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gomez, V.A.; Gaona, E.F.; Arias, O.R.; Lopez, M.B.; Ocampos, O.E. Aspectos biológicos de Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) criados con diferentes dietas en condiciones de laboratorio. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 2013, 72, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hayashida, R.; Bueno, A.F.; Hermel, A.O.; Hirakuri, M.H.; Silva, F.A.C.; Roggia, S. Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) fitness on artificial diets. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 1605–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mendoza, A.C.; Rocha, A.C.P.; Parra, J.R.P. Lyophilized artificial diet for rearing the Neotropical Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Insect Sci. 2016, 16, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cingolani, M.F.; Greco, N.M.; Liljesthröm, G.G. Cold-Storage of Piezodorus guildinii (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Eggs for Rearing Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae). J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2015, 17, 1507–1516. [Google Scholar]
  19. Foerster, L.A.; Doetzer, A.K. Cold storage of the egg parasitoids Trissolcus basalis (Wollaston) and Telenomus podisi Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Biol. Control 2006, 36, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramos, G.S. Capacidade de Dispersão e Parâmetros Biológicos Inerentes à Criação Massal de Telenomus podisi Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) para o Controle de Pentatomídeos-Praga em Soja. Master’s Thesis, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil, 2020; 122p. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa da Especificação de Referência. Available online: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/insumos-agropecuarios/insumos-agricolas/agrotoxicos/produtos-fitossanitarios/arquivos-especificacao-de-referencia/INSDAn252019.especifreferDOU.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2021).
  22. Pacheco, D.J.P.; Corrêa-Ferreira, B.S. Potencial reprodutivo e longevidade do parasitoide Telenomus podisi Ashmead em ovos de diferentes espécies de percevejos. An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 1998, 27, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bourchier, R.S.; Smith, S.M. Influence of environmental conditions and parasitoid quality on field performance of Trichogramma minutum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1996, 80, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Selvaraj, S.; Ganeshamoorthi, P.; Pandiaraj, T. Potential impacts of recente climate change on biological control agentes on agro-ecosystem: A review. Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv. 2013, 5, 845–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elzhov, T.V.; Mullen, K.M.; Spiess, A.N.; Bolker, B. Minpack.lm: R Interface to the Levenberg-Marquardt Nonlinear Least-Squares Algorithm Found in MINPACK, Plus Support for Bounds; R Package Version 1.2-1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2016; Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=minpack.lm (accessed on 31 March 2023).
  26. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  27. Campbell, A.; Frazer, B.; Gilbert, N.; Gutierrez, A.; Mackauer, M. Temperature requirements of some aphids and their parasites. J. Appl. Ecol. 1974, 11, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Briere, J.F.; Pracros, P.; Le Roux, A.Y.; Pierre, J.S. A novel rate model of temperature-dependent development for arthropods. Environ. Entomol. 1999, 28, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Burr, I.W.; Foster, L.E. A test for equality of variances. Purdue Univ. 1972, 282, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  30. Shapiro, S.S.; Wilk, M.B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965, 52, 591–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Noldus, L.P.J.J. Semiochemicals foraging behaviour and quality of entomophagous insects for biological control. J. Appl. Entomol. 1989, 108, 425–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pereira, F.F.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Oliveira, H.N.; Grance, E.L.V.; Pastori, P.L.; Gava-Oliveira, M.D. Thermal requeriments and estimate number of generations of Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in differente Eucalyptus plantations regions. Braz. J. Biol. 2011, 71, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huey, R.B.; Berrigan, D. Temperature, demography, and ectotherm fitness. Am. Nat. 2001, 158, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaves, V.F.; Pereira, F.F.; Torres, J.B.; Da Silva, I.F.; Pastori, P.L.; Oliveira, H.N.; Costa, V.A.; Cardoso, C.R.G. Thermal Requirements of Ooencyrtus submetallicus (Hym.: Encyrtidae) and Telenomus podisi (Hym.: Platygastridae) Parasitizing Euschistus heros Eggs (Hem.: Pentatomidae). Insects 2021, 12, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cividanes, F.J.; Figueiredo, J.G.; Carvalho, D.R. Previsão da emergência de Trissolcus brochymenae (Ashmead) e Telenomus podisi (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) em condições de campo. Sci. Agric. 1998, 55, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maceda, A.; Hohmann, C.L.; Santos, H.R. Temperature effects on Trichogramma pretiosum Riley and Trichogrammatoidea annulata De Santis. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2003, 46, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pereira, F.F.; Barros, R.; Pratissoli, D.; Parra, J.R.P. Biologia e exigências térmicas de Trichogramma pretiosum Riley e T. exiguum Pinto & Planter (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) criados em ovos de Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2004, 33, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pinto, J.R.L.; Fernandes, A.O. Parasitism capacity of Telenomus remus and Trichogramma pretiosum on eggs of moth pests of peanut. Bull. Insectol. 2020, 1, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  39. Silva, G.V.; Bueno, A.F.; Neves, P.M.O.J.; Favetti, B.M. Biological characteristics and parasitism capacity of Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) on eggs of Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 10, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McCalla, K.A.; Keçeci, M.; Milosavljević, I.; Ratkowsky, D.A.; Hoddle, M.S. The Influence of Temperature Variation on Life History Parameters and Thermal Performance Curves of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a Parasitoid of the Asian Citrus Psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 1560–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mills, N.J.; Kuhlmann, U. The relationship between egg load and fecundity among Trichogramma parasitoids. Environ. Entomol. 2000, 25, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. van Lenteren, J.C.; Hale, A.; Klapwijk, J.N.; van Schelt, J.; Steinberg, S. Guidelines for Quality Control of Commercially Produced Natural Enemies. In Quality Control and Production of Biological Control Agents: Theory and Testing Procedures; van Lenteren, J.C., Ed.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2003; pp. 265–303. [Google Scholar]
  43. Denis, D.; Pierre, J.S.; van Baaren, J.; van Alphen, J.J.M. How temperature and habitat quality affect parasitoid lifetime reproductive success—A simulation study. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222, 1604–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Visser, B.; Ellers, J. Lack of lipogenesis in parasitoids: A review of physiological mechanisms and evolutionary implications. J. Insect Physiol. 2008, 54, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Carmo, E.L.; Bueno, A.F.; Bueno, R.C.O.F. Pesticide selectivity for the insect egg parasitoid Telenomus remus. Biocontrol 2010, 55, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stephens, D.W.; Krebs, J.R. Foraging Theory; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mendoza, A.C. Desenvolvimento de Dietas Artificiais Liofilizadas para Euschistus heros (Fabricius, 1798), com Vistas à Produção de Telenomus Podisi (Ashmead, 1893) e Trissolcus basalis (Wollaston, 1858). Ph.D. Thesis, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil, 2012; 112p. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pomari, A.F.; Bueno, A.F.; Bueno, R.C.O.F.; Menezes-Junior, A.O. Biological characteristics and thermal requirements of the biological control agent Telenomus remus (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) reared on eggs of different species of the genus Spodoptera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2012, 105, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mawela, K.V.; Kfir, R.; Kruger, K. Effect of temperature and host species on parasitism, development time and sex ratio of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma toidealutea Girault (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Biol. Control 2013, 64, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bertin, A.; Pavinato, V.A.C.; Parra, J.R.P. Fitness-related changes in laboratory populations of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma galloi and the implications of rearing on factitious hosts. Biocontrol 2017, 62, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Giunti, G.; Canale, A.; Messing, R.H.; Donati, E.; Stefanini, C.; Michaud, J.P.; Benelli, G. Parasitoid learning: Current knowledge and implications for biological control. Biol. Control 2015, 90, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Haverkamp, A.; Smid, H.M. A neuronal arms race: The role of learning in parasitoid-host interactions. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2020, 42, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Favero, K.; Pereira, F.F.; Torres, J.B.; Oliveira, N.; Kassab, S.O.; Zanuncio, J.C. Reproduction of Tetrastichus howardi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Pupae at Different Temperatures. Fla. Entomol. 2015, 98, 865–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Furlong, M.J.; Zalucki, M.P. Climate change and biological control: The consequences of increasing temperatures on host–parasitoid interactions. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2017, 20, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Borges-Filho, R.C.; Nava, D.E.; Polanczyk, R.A.; Marangon, R.B.; Loiácono, M. Biology of Telenomus pachycoris (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), a parasitoid of eggs of Pachycoris torridus (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae): The effects of egg age, exposure time, and temperature. Fla. Entomol. 2017, 100, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Braz, E.C.; Bueno, A.F.; Colombo, F.F.; Queiroz, A.P. Temperature impact on Telenomus podisi emergence in field releases of Unprotected and Encapsulated parasitoid pupae. Neotrop. Entomol. 2021, 50, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Taguti, E.A.; Gonçalves, J.; Bueno, A.F.; Marchioro, S.T. Telenomus podisi parasitism on Dichelops melacanthus and Podisus nigrispinus eggs at different temperatures. Fla. Entomol. 2019, 102, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. van Lenteren, J.C.; Bigler, F. Quality Control of Mass Reared Egg Parasitoids. In Egg Parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma; Consoli, F., Parra, J.R.P., Zucchi, R., Eds.; Progress in Biological Control; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 315–340. [Google Scholar]
  59. Bertin, A.; Pinto, A.S.; Parra, J.R.P. Controle de qualidade de inimigos naturais. In Controle Biológico com Parasitoides e Predadores na Agricultura Brasileira; Parra, J.R.P., Pinto, A.S., Nava, D.E., Oliveira, R.C., Diniz, A.J.F., Eds.; Fealq: Piracicaba, Brazil, 2021; pp. 401–426. [Google Scholar]
  60. van Lenteren, J.C.; Bolckmans, K.; Kohl, J.; Revensberg, W.J.; Urbaneja, A. Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: Plenty of new opportunities. Biocontrol 2018, 63, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Brown, J.H.; Gillooly, J.F.; Allen, A.P.; Savage, V.M.; West, G.B. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 2004, 85, 1771–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Woodward, G.; Ebenman, B.; Emmerson, M.; Montoya, J.M.; Olesen, J.M.; Valido, A.; Warren, P.H. Body size in ecological networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Henri, D.C.; Van Veen, F.J.F. Body Size, Life History and the Structure of Host–Parasitoid Networks. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2011, 45, 135–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rooney, N.; McCann, K.S.; Moore, J.C. A landscape theory for food web architecture. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 867–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. McDougall, S.J.; Mills, N.J. The influence of hosts, temperature and food sources on the longevity of Trichogramma platneri. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1997, 83, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bueno, R.C.O.F.; Parra, J.R.P.; Bueno, A.F. Biological characteristics and thermal requirements of a Brazilian strain of the parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum reared on eggs of Pseudoplusia includens and Anticarsia gemmatalis. Biol. Control 2009, 51, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ris, N.; Allemand, R.; Fouillet, P.; Fleury, F. The joint effect of temperature and host species induce complex genotype-by-environment interactions in the larval parasitoid of Drosophila, Leptopilina heterotoma (Hymenoptera: Figitidae). Oikos 2004, 106, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Spahn, R.; Lill, J.T. Higher temperatures reduce the efficacy of a key biocontrol parasitoid. Biol. Control 2022, 176, 105079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Thompson, S.N. Nutrition and in vitro culture of insect parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1986, 31, 197–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Borges, M.; Aldrich, J.R. Attractant pheromone for Nearctic stink bug, Euschistus obscurus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): Insight into a Neotropical relative. J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Queiroz, A.P.; Taguti, E.A.; Bueno, A.F.; Grande, M.L.M.; Costa, C.O. Host preferences of Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae): Parasitism on eggs of Dichelops melacanthus, Euschistus heros, and Podisus nigrispinus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2018, 47, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lü, X.; Han, S.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Li, Z. Effects of cold storage on the quality of Trichogramma dendrolimi Matsumura (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) reared on artificial medium. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 75, 1328–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Paixão, M.F.; Takahashi, T.A.; Sassaki, G.L.; Foerster, L.A. The prospects for cryopreservation of noctuid eggs in the mass production of Trichogramma spp. Biocontrol 2021, 66, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Siam, A.; Zohdy, N.Z.M.; ELHafez, A.M.A.; Moursy, L.E.; Sherif, H.A.E.L. Effect of different cold storage periods of rearing host eggs on the performance of the parasitoid Trichogramma evanescens (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2019, 29, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Jia, F.; Zhang, M.; Wang, M.; Mao, J.; Zhang, L. Cold storage effects on biological parameters of Telenomus remus, a promising egg parasitoid of Spodoptera frugiperda, reared on Spodoptera litura eggs. J. Pest Sci. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 7. Linear and nonlinear regression models of temperature-dependent ratio of development for Telenomus podisi. (AF) correspond to the treatments T1 to T6 respectively.
Figure 7. Linear and nonlinear regression models of temperature-dependent ratio of development for Telenomus podisi. (AF) correspond to the treatments T1 to T6 respectively.
Insects 14 00435 g007
Table 1. Type of diet, ingredients, and quantity offered per box in the rearing of Euschistus heros.
Table 1. Type of diet, ingredients, and quantity offered per box in the rearing of Euschistus heros.
DietIngredientsQuantity Offered Per Box
NaturalFresh bean pod (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)10 units
Raw peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)20 g
Artificial 135 g raw peanut10 units of 1 cm2
30 g soybean (Glycine max L.)
5 g sucrose
25 mL distilled water
2 mL anticontaminants 1
Artificial 235 g raw peanut10 units of 1 cm2
30 g fresh bean pod
10 g sunflower seed (Helianthus annuus L.)
10 g wheat germ (Triticum spp.)
10 g soybean
5 g sucrose
2 mL anticontaminants 1
1 Anticontaminants composed of tetracycline (0.00765 ppm), nipagim (10,000 ppm), and sorbic acid (800 ppm) [17].
Table 2. Linear and nonlinear models used to estimate the ratio of development to room temperature (24 ± 2 °C).
Table 2. Linear and nonlinear models used to estimate the ratio of development to room temperature (24 ± 2 °C).
ModelEquationDefinition of VariablesReferences
Linear r T = a + b · T a: line intercept b: line slope[27]
Briere 1 r T = a · T · T T m i n · T m a x T 1 2 Tmin: minimum temperature
Tmax: maximum temperature
[28]
Table 3. Nonlinear regression model parameters of temperature-dependent development ratio, lower temperature threshold (Tmin °C), upper temperature threshold (Tmax °C), and optimal temperature threshold (Topt °C) for Telenomus podisi under laboratory conditions (14 h of photophase, 70 ± 10% RH, and 25 ± 2 °C).
Table 3. Nonlinear regression model parameters of temperature-dependent development ratio, lower temperature threshold (Tmin °C), upper temperature threshold (Tmax °C), and optimal temperature threshold (Topt °C) for Telenomus podisi under laboratory conditions (14 h of photophase, 70 ± 10% RH, and 25 ± 2 °C).
TreatmentModelParametersEstimatesSE
T1Briere1a1.974 × 10−49.490 × 10−5
Tmax31.804.573
Tmin17.709.624 × 10−1
Topt28.10
T2Briere1a1.192 × 10−46.734 × 10−5
Tmax33.003.696 × 10−4
Tmin13.286.090
Topt28.10
T3Briere1a1.170 × 10−47.176 × 10−5
Tmax33.954.680
Tmin16.852.381
Topt29.50
T4Briere1a1.469 × 10−42.495 × 10−5
Tmax33.001.635 × 10−4
Tmin15.761.332
Topt28.60
T5Briere1a1.377 × 10−43.937 × 10−5
Tmax32.281.593
Tmin16.131.259
Topt28.1
T6Briere1a1.637 × 10−43.287 × 10−5
Tmax33.001.796 × 10−4
Tmin17.841.353
Topt29.00
Table 4. Linear regression model parameters and R2 adjusted for temperature-dependent development ratio, lower temperature threshold (To °C), and thermal constant (K °day) for Telenomus podisi under laboratory conditions (14 h of photophase, 70 ± 10% RH, and 25 ± 2 °C).
Table 4. Linear regression model parameters and R2 adjusted for temperature-dependent development ratio, lower temperature threshold (To °C), and thermal constant (K °day) for Telenomus podisi under laboratory conditions (14 h of photophase, 70 ± 10% RH, and 25 ± 2 °C).
TreatmentsaSEbSEToKR2aj
T1−0.2061380.0339380.0118570.0014924.8584.340.9539
T2−0.0811860.1268820.0066020.00518613.32151.460.4475
T3−0.1141400.0424440.0071350.0017428.76140.150.7978
T4−0.1600320.0740110.0097750.0030376.25102.300.7006
T5−0.1066630.0580890.0070220.0023839.38142.410.6575
T6−0.1660390.0307160.0095810.0012606.02104.370.9342
Table 5. Body length (mm) of Telenomus podisi females emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets at seven temperatures. Means followed by the same lower case letters in columns and upper case letters in rows do not differ at the 5% level.
Table 5. Body length (mm) of Telenomus podisi females emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets at seven temperatures. Means followed by the same lower case letters in columns and upper case letters in rows do not differ at the 5% level.
Females Body Length
Temperature (°C)ND 1AD1 2AD2 3
Fresh 4 (T1)Cryo 4 (T2)Fresh (T3)Cryo (T4)Fresh (T5)Cryo (T6)
15------
18------
210.998 ± 0.029 bC-1.064 ± 0.014 aAB1.119 ± 0.016 aA1.032 ± 0.013 aBC1.089 ± 0.017 aA
240.981 ± 0.011 bB1.022 ± 0.011 aAB1.042 ± 0.007 aA1.026 ± 0.015 bAB1.024 ± 0.012 aAB1.012 ± 0.025 bA
271.110 ± 0.050 aA1.027 ± 0.017 aA1.049 ± 0.007 aA1.031 ± 0.014 bA1.048 ± 0.008 aA1.060 ± 0.018 abA
301.020 ± 0.010 abA0.947 ± 0.000 aA1.053 ± 0.017 aA1.033 ± 0.016 bA1.064 ± 0.012 aA1.037 ± 0.015 abA
33----1.079 ± 0.019 aA1.083 ± 0.025 abA
1 Natural diet. 2 Artificial diet 1. 3 Artificial diet 2. 4 Fresh or cryopreserved eggs of Euschistus heros parasitized by Telenomus podisi. “-” represents insufficiency of numerical data to perform statistical analysis.
Table 6. Body length (mm) of male Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets at seven temperatures. Means followed by the same lower case letters in columns and upper case letters in rows do not differ at the 5% level.
Table 6. Body length (mm) of male Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets at seven temperatures. Means followed by the same lower case letters in columns and upper case letters in rows do not differ at the 5% level.
Males Body Length
Temperature (°C)ND 1AD1 2AD2 3
Fresh 4 (T1)Cryop 4 (T2)Fresh (T3)Cryop (T4)Fresh (T5)Cryop (T6)
15------
18------
21--0.992 ± 0.014 aA1.012 ± 0.029 aA1.000 ± 0.022 bA1.042 ± 0.017 abA
240.972 ± 0.021 A0.991 ± 0.021 aA0.982 ± 0.014 aA0.980 ± 0.015 aA1.028 ± 0.024 abA0.974 ± 0.013 bA
27-1.085 ± 0.055 aA1.020 ± 0.000 aA-1.020 ± 0.000 abA1.040 ± 0.009 abA
30-0.996 ± 0.035 aA1.060 ± 0.015 aA1.070 ± 0.000 aA1.060 ± 0.014 aA1.059 ± 0.014 aA
33---
1 Natural diet. 2 Artificial diet 1. 3 Artificial diet 2. 4 Fresh or cryopreserved eggs of Euschistus heros parasitized by Telenomus podisi. “-” represents insufficiency of numerical data to perform statistical analysis.
Table 7. Parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets under seven temperatures. Means followed by the same lower case letters in columns and upper case in rows do not differ at the 5% level.
Table 7. Parasitism (%) of Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets under seven temperatures. Means followed by the same lower case letters in columns and upper case in rows do not differ at the 5% level.
Parasitism
Temperature (°C)ND 1AD1 2AD2 3
Fresh 4 (T1)Cryop 4 (T2)Fresh (T3)Cryop (T4)Fresh (T5)Cryop (T6)
151.20 ± 0.49 eB0.00 dC2.79 ± 0.75 dB0.19 ± 0.20 eB8.99 ± 1.34 efA0.40 ± 0.28 eB
187.59 ± 1.23 dB0.40 ± 0.28 cC6.39 ± 1.13 dB2.40 ± 0.69 eC14.20 ± 1.69 deA0.20 ± 0.20 eC
2130.39 ± 2.47 bB18.20 ± 1.91 aC26.99 ± 2.32 bB13.59 ± 1.65 bcC44.79 ± 2.99 aA29.80 ± 2.44 abB
2448.40 ± 3.11 aA24.80 ± 2.23 aC40.60 ± 2.85 aA47.00 ± 3.07 aA28.39 ± 2.38 bcBC37.00 ± 2.72 aAB
2716.40 ± 1.81 cCD8.00 ± 1.26 bE32.39 ± 2.55 abAB10.8 ± 1.47 cdDE37.99 ± 2.76 abA23.80 ± 2.18 bcBC
3011.59 ± 1.52 cdC18.80 ± 1.94 aAB13.19 ± 1.62 cBC21.19 ± 2.06 bA19.79 ± 1.99 cdAB18.00 ± 1.90 cdABC
339.59 ± 1.39 cdABC1.20 ± 0.49 cD13.59 ± 1.65 cA7.20 ± 1.20 dBC5.39 ± 1.04 fC11.4 ± 1.51 dAB
1 Natural diet. 2 Artificial diet 1. 3 Artificial diet 2. 4 Fresh or cryopreserved eggs of Euschistus heros parasitized by Telenomus podisi.
Table 8. Viability (%) of Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets. Means followed by the same upper case letters in “Diet” and lower case in “Temperature” do not differ at the 5% level.
Table 8. Viability (%) of Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets. Means followed by the same upper case letters in “Diet” and lower case in “Temperature” do not differ at the 5% level.
Viability
Diet Temperature (°C)
T112.33 ± 0.038 B150 d
T214.1 ± 0.038 B180 d
T322.4 ± 0.046 AB2127.6 ± 4.6 b
T420.5 ± 0.049 AB2466.3 ± 4.9 a
T528.4 ± 0.05 A2719.9 ± 3.6 b
T620.3 ± 0.046 C3016.7 ± 2.6 bc
333.8 ± 2.4 cd
Table 9. Number of individuals per egg of Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets under seven temperatures. Means followed by the same upper case letters in “Diet” and lower case in “Temperature” do not differ at the 5% level.
Table 9. Number of individuals per egg of Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets under seven temperatures. Means followed by the same upper case letters in “Diet” and lower case in “Temperature” do not differ at the 5% level.
Number of Individuals per Egg
Diet Temperature (°C)
T10.339 ± 0.080 A150.000 c
T20.360 ± 0.083 A180.000 c
T30.606 ± 0.131 A210.777 ± 0.08 a
T40.454 ± 0.083 A240.883 ± 0.06 a
T50.617 ± 0.113 A270.687 ± 0.08 a
T60.588 ± 0.151 A300.93 ± 0.21 a
330.083 ± 0.05 b
Table 10. Sex ratio (female to male) of Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets under seven temperatures. Means followed by the same upper case letters in “Diet” and lower case in “Temperature” do not differ at the 5% level.
Table 10. Sex ratio (female to male) of Telenomus podisi emerged from eggs of Euschistus heros reared from different diets under seven temperatures. Means followed by the same upper case letters in “Diet” and lower case in “Temperature” do not differ at the 5% level.
Sex Ratio
Diet Temperature (°C)
T10.299 ± 0.07 AB150.000 b
T20.200 ± 0.061 B180.000 b
T30.414 ± 0.071 AB210.530 ± 0.078 a
T40.327 ± 0.069 AB240.657 ± 0.066 a
T50.442 ± 0.088 A270.538 ± 0.082 a
T60.255 ± 0.07 B300.409 ± 0.099 a
330.083 ± 0.047 b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parra, L.M.; Carvalho, J.R.d.; Hoback, W.W.; Oliveira, R.C.d. Optimizing Mass Rearing of the Egg Parasitoid, Telenomus podisi, for Control of the Brown Stink Bug, Euschistus heros. Insects 2023, 14, 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050435

AMA Style

Parra LM, Carvalho JRd, Hoback WW, Oliveira RCd. Optimizing Mass Rearing of the Egg Parasitoid, Telenomus podisi, for Control of the Brown Stink Bug, Euschistus heros. Insects. 2023; 14(5):435. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050435

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parra, Letícia Martins, José Romário de Carvalho, William Wyatt Hoback, and Regiane Cristina de Oliveira. 2023. "Optimizing Mass Rearing of the Egg Parasitoid, Telenomus podisi, for Control of the Brown Stink Bug, Euschistus heros" Insects 14, no. 5: 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050435

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop