Next Article in Journal
Potential of Entomopathogenic Nematode HbSD as a Candidate Biocontrol Agent against Spodoptera frugiperda
Previous Article in Journal
Wheat-Bran-Based Artificial Diet for Mass Culturing of the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 1
10.3390/insects14010001
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interspecific Competitions between Frankliniella intonsa and Frankliniella occidentalis on Fresh Lentil Bean Pods and Pepper Plants

by
Chun-Hong Yang
1,†,
Feng-Jiao Qiao
1,†,
Zhaozhi Lu
1,
Chang-You Li
1,
Tong-Xian Liu
1,
Yu-Lin Gao
2,* and
Bin Zhang
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Integrated Crop Pest Management of Shandong Province, College of Plant Health and Medicine, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2023, 14(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010001
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 3 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In this article, we studied the interactions between the invasive thrips pest Frankliniella occidentalis (WFT) and a native thrips Frankliniella intonsa (IFT) in China, where they co-exist on crop plants and WFT seems to outcompete IFT. In laboratory bioassays we focused on the reproductive mode of the thrips (sexual or parthenogenic), and the presence of a sugar source (honey or flowers), both variables that change over time during pest colonisation of a crop. Our results suggest that in the early stages of F. occidentalis invasion, the provision of honey (flowering) promotes this pest’s population development. This research will inform effective strategies for the management of F. occidentalis invasion and help reduce subsequent crop damages.

Abstract

Background: Flower thrips (Frankliniella intonsa, IFT) and west flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis, WFT) are often found together on the host plant in China. WFT is an important invasive species that seems to outcompete the native IFT. In order to clarify the interspecific competitions between the two thrips, this study measured the population development of IFT and WFT under sexual and parthenogenetic reproductive modes on two hosts (fresh lentil bean pods with/without honey and pepper plants at seedling/flowering stages) in the laboratory. Results: When reared on fresh lentil bean pods (with/without honey), WFT population size was lower in mixed species populations compared to single species populations but the presence of WFT had nor negative effect on IFT population size. These results were dependent of the reproductive mode. When honey was supplied, the ratio of female-to-male in the progeny of WFT produced under sexual reproductive mode increased significantly in the presence of IFT. On pepper seedlings, mixed populations were more favorable to the population development of IFT at the seedling stage, but more favorable to WFT at the flowering stage. Conclusions: In the early stage of WFT invasion and colonization, the emergence of flowering and honey (nectar) sources may have a positive effect on the population development of WFT.

1. Introduction

Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) is an important invasive pest on vegetables and flowers [1]. Since its discovery in the United States [2], F. occidentalis has expanded rapidly throughout the world [3] and is now distributed in many countries and regions [4]. Frankliniella occidentalis was first reported and became established in mainland China in 2003 [5]. Subsequently, F. occidentalis was observed in many places in China, and at present, damage caused by F. occidentalis has been reported in more than 10 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities [1,6]. Frankliniella occidentalis has a wide host range of more than 250 types of vegetables and flowers [7,8,9].
Frankliniella intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) is a native species and widely distributed in China. Frankliniella intonsa and F. occidentalis have similar morphology and habits and produce similar damage to their hosts [10]. Frankliniella intonsa and F. occidentalis usually occur together on the same plants and have overlapping ecological niches [11,12]. Both F. intonsa and F. occidentalis have a short developmental period, high fecundity, and both sexual and parthenogenetic reproductive modes. They are small, disperse easily, and feed in cryptic sites [13,14]. They can cause injury to their host plants by direct feeding or laying eggs [15,16,17]. Frankliniella intonsa and F. occidentalis damage the leaves of plants [18,19] and feed on the flowers [20,21] and fruits [22], affecting both plant photosynthesis [23] and fruit quality [7,24]. At the same time, these two species of thrips can spread a variety of plant viruses to their hosts causing more serious injury [25,26,27,28] and huge economic losses every year [29,30,31].
Some studies have shown that F. occidentalis, as an invasive pest, was more adaptable than F. intonsa. The survival rate of F. occidentalis was greater than that of F. intonsa under thermal stress [32]. The population growth of F. occidentalis was larger than that of F. intonsa when populations coexisted [10], and the population growth of F. occidentalis was larger than that of F. intonsa under imidacloprid stress [33]. Recent studies showed that the degree of injury caused by F. occidentalis varies greatly in different areas and that F. intonsa is the dominant species in some areas [34]. The reasons behind this variation are unknown. Both F. intonsa and F. occidentalis are capable of sexual and parthenogenetic reproduction. In parthenogenetic reproduction, females do not need to mate to reproduce as unfertilized eggs develop into haploid males [13]. When both male and female thrips are present, they will produce diploid females from fertilized eggs and haploid males from unfertilized eggs [14]. A female-biased sex ratio was initially produced by all mated females [35]. This phenomenon complicates the competition between the two thrips. In addition, the flowering period of the host plant has a great influence on the population dynamics of thrips. Both species tended to aggregate within flowers when these were available [36] and the population growth increased almost geometrically after flowering [37]. The population of thrips on vegetables increased during the flowering period and peaked in the full flowering period [38]. Does flower nectar affect competition outcomes? The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of the emergence of honey/nectar sources and different reproductive modes on the competitions between the two thrips.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plants and Insects

Pepper (Capsicum annuum, Diwang336, Shouguang, Shandong, China) seedlings were grown in soil in 12-hole trays (540 mm × 280 mm × 58 mm). When three true leaves had developed, individual pepper seedlings were transplanted into a flowerpot (150 mm diameter and 132 mm high). The competitions experiment used pepper seedlings at two stages: the seedling stage (from four true leaves to the end of the seedling stage) and the flowering/fruit-setting stage. The duration of each stage was 28 d. Prior to sowing pepper seeds we added 200 g/m2 organic fertilizer consisting of 15 g/m2 urea, 30 g/m2 diammonium phosphate and 30 g/m2 potassium sulfate. At the pod setting stage, we added organic fertilizer consisting of 22.5 g/m2, urea is 7.5 g/m2, and potassium sulfate 7.5 g/m2. Lentil bean pods were picked when approximately 15 cm long and used for rearing thrips.
Frankliniella occidentalis were collected from clover on the campus of Qingdao Agricultural University (N 36°31′, E 120°39′). Frankliniella intonsa were collected from Hainan pepper flowers. Thrips were cultured on fresh lentil beans in an incubator at 28 ± 1 °C, 14 L:10 D photoperiod, and 50% ± 5% RH. Parthenogenetic rearing of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa was achieved by culturing single larvae in a 50 mL centrifuge tube with fresh lentil bean pods as food. For sexual rearing, about 100 larvae of F. occidentalis or F. intonsa larvae of the same age were placed in a glass jar (15 cm × 15 cm × 12 cm) that contained fresh lentil bean pods. All tested adults were randomly selected from these populations.

2.2. Experimental Design

2.2.1. The Culture of Thrips under Sexual Reproductive Mode on Fresh Lentil Bean Pods

Ten males and 20 females of F. occidentalis or F. intonsa were cultured together in a glass jar (15 cm × 15 cm × 12 cm) as the non-competitions (control) groups. The non-competitions treatment for F. occidentalis and F. intonsa replicated 4 times. Five males and 10 females of F. occidentalis were cultured together with 5 males and 10 females of F. intonsa in a single glass jar as the competitions group and was this was replicated 4 times. The foods for all groups were beans soaked in 10% honey (as a nectar substitute) for 2 h for the honey treatment, or beans that had not been soaked in honey for the without honey treatment. Both treatments with and without honey were replicated 4 times. The food was replaced with fresh food each day until the female died. The progeny was raised individually to adults, and the gender and number were recorded (Table 1, No 1).

2.2.2. The Culture of Thrips under Parthenogenetic Reproductive Mode on Fresh Lentil Bean Pods

In this case, 20 females of F. occidentalis or F. intonsa were cultured separately in glass jar (15 cm × 15 cm × 12 cm) as non-competitions (control) groups, and ten females of F. occidentalis and 10 females of F. intonsa were cultured together as the competitions group. The culture of each group was replicated three times. The foods for all groups were beans soaked in 10% honey (as a nectar substitute) for 2 h for the honey treatment, or beans that had not been soaked in honey for the without honey treatment. Both treatments with and without honey were replicated three times. The food was taken out and placed in a new glass tube every day until the maternal female died. The progeny was raised individually to adults, and the gender and number were recorded (Table 1, No 2).

2.2.3. The Culture of Thrips under Sexual Reproductive Mode on Pepper Plants

Peppers at seedling stage or at the beginning of flowering stage and of similar health were placed individually in a plastic flowerpot (150 mm diam., 132 mm high). The flowerpot mouth was sealed with plastic wrap and sealing paper to prevent thrips from falling onto the ground. Newly emerged thrips that had not laid eggs were transferred from the test glass jars onto the peppers. Three groups were established: sexual F. occidentalis (20 females and 10 males of F. occidentalis were placed together), sexual F. intonsa (20 females and 10 males of F. intonsa were placed together) and mixture of sexual F. occidentalis and F. intonsa (10 females and 5 males each of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa were placed together). Each group was replicated three times. The thrips in the flowerpot were observed daily. After the experiment, a trematode tube was used to remove all the thrips and peppers. Next, they were treated with 70% alcohol and the number of females and males of each species were counted under a microscope (Table 1, No 3).

2.2.4. The Culture of Thrips under Parthenogenetic Reproductive Mode on Pepper Plants

The same experimental set-up and method was used as above in 2.2.3, except the three groups were: parthenogenetic F. occidentalis (30 females of F. occidentalis were placed onto peppers), parthenogenetic F. intonsa (30 females of F. intonsa were placed onto peppers) and a mixture of parthenogenetic F. occidentalis and F. intonsa (15 females each of parthenogenetic F. occidentalis and F. intonsa were placed together onto peppers). Each group had three replicates. The thrips in the flowerpot were observed daily (Table 1, No 4).

2.3. Data Analysis

Growth index was calculated as:
Growth index = number of F/number of P,
Where P = parental generation and F = filial generation.
All data were analyzed by SAS 8.1 software, and the difference between various parameters with and without competitions was analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Interspecific Competitions on the Population Development of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa Cultured under Sexual Reproduction Mode on Fresh Lentil Bean Pods

When thrips were fed on fresh lentil bean pods, interspecific competitions did not affect the population growth index of F. intonsa, but the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly affected. Regardless of the presence or absence of honey, the population growth index of F. occidentalis decreased significantly after it was mixed with F. intonsa (Figure 1A,B). In the presence of honey, the female-to-male ratio in the progeny of F. occidentalis increased significantly after mixing with F. intonsa (Figure 2).
As a single species (non-competitions group), the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly greater than that of F. intonsa regardless of the presence (F11,36 = 14.98, p < 0.001) or absence of honey (F11,36 = 27.84, p < 0.001). When males and females were analyzed separately, the population growth index of F. occidentalis males (F7,24 = 14.41, p < 0.001) and females (F7,24 = 12.73, p < 0.001) was also significantly greater than that of F. intonsa. In the competitions (mixed species) group, the population growth index of F. occidentalis was no significant difference with that of F. intonsa (F7,24 = 20.25, p < 0.001). When males and females were analyzed separately, the population growth index of F. occidentalis males and females was also no significant difference with that of F. intonsa. (Figure 1A,B).
The population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly affected by interspecific competitions. The population growth index of F. occidentalis in the competitions group was significantly lower than that in the non-competitions group. When males and females were analyzed separately, the population growth index of F. occidentalis females and males in the competitions group was also significantly lower than that in the non-competitions group. However, there was no significant difference in the population growth index of F. intonsa between competitions group and non-competitions groups regardless of the presence or absence of honey. When males and females were analyzed separately, there was also no significant difference.
In the absence of honey, the female-to-male ratio in the progeny of F. intonsa was significantly greater than that in F. occidentalis progeny in both groups (F7,24 = 1.57, p = 0.1916; Figure 2). In the presence of honey, female-to-male ratio in the progeny of F. intonsa was significantly greater than that of F. occidentalis under non-competitions conditions. However, in the competitions group, the female-to-male ratio in the progeny of F. occidentalis was not significantly different from that in the progeny of F. intonsa. In the presence of honey, the female-to-male ratio in the progeny of F. occidentalis in the competitions group was significantly greater than that in the non-competitions group, but there was no significant difference in female-to-male ratio in the progeny of F. intonsa between non-competitions and competitions groups.

3.2. Effect of Interspecific Competitions on the Population Development of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa on Fresh Lentil Bean Pods under the Parthenogenetic Reproductive Mode

Under non-competitions conditions and parthenogenetic reproductive mode, the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly greater than that of F. intonsa regardless of the presence or absence of honey (F7,16 = 44.38, p < 0.001; Figure 1C). In the competitions group, the population growth index of F. occidentalis was again significantly greater than that of F. intonsa. Under the parthenogenetic reproductive mode, the population growth index of F. intonsa in the non-competitions group was not significantly different from that in the competitions group regardless of the presence or absence of honey. However, the population growth index of F. occidentalis in the competitions group was significantly lower than that in the non-competitions group.

3.3. Effect of Interspecific Competitions on the Population Development of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa Cultured under Sexual Reproductive Mode on Pepper Seedlings

Under the non-competitions condition, the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly greater than that of F. intonsa when cultured at the seedling stage. In the competitions group, although the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly greater than that of F. intonsa, it was not significantly different from that in the non-competitions group. In contrast, the population growth index of F. intonsa in the competitions group was still significantly greater than that in the non-competitions group (F3,8 = 148.98, p < 0.001; Figure 3A).
When cultured at the flowering stage under non-competitions conditions, there was no significant difference in the population growth index between F. intonsa and F. occidentalis. In the competitions group, the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly greater than that of F. intonsa. The population growth index of F. occidentalis in the competitions group was significantly greater than that in the non-competitions group. However, the population growth index F. intonsa in the competitions group was significantly lower than that in the non-competitions group (F3,8 = 9.11, p = 0.0058; Figure 3B).

3.4. Effect of Interspecific Competitions on the Population Development of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa on Pepper Seedlings under Parthenogenetic Reproductive Mode

Following culture at the seedling stage under non-competitions conditions, the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly greater than that of F. intonsa. In the competitions group, there was no significant difference between the population growth index of F. occidentalis and that of F. intonsa. The population growth index of F. occidentalis in the competitions group was significantly lower than that in the non-competitions group. The population growth index of F. intonsa in the competitions group was not significantly different from that in the non-competitions group (F3,12 = 11.33, p = 0.0008; Figure 3C).
Following culture at the flowering stage under non-competitions conditions, the population growth index of F. intonsa was significantly greater than that of F. occidentalis. In the competitions group, the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly greater than of F. intonsa. The population growth index of F. occidentalis in the competitions group was not significantly different from that in the non-competitions group. The population growth index of F. intonsa in the competitions group was significantly lower than that in the non-competitions group (F3,8 = 22.57, p = 0.0003; Figure 3D).

4. Discussion

Frankliniella occidentalis is a highly invasive pest that has spread from its original range to a worldwide distribution. Superior competitive ability is considered one of the main reasons for F. occidentalis’ success in the invasion. However, in some areas, F. occidentalis is not the dominant species, the invasive F. occidentalis appears to be competitively excluded by the native thrips. For example, F. occidentalis occurs in low numbers in the eastern states of the USA, where the native F. tritici dominates [39,40]. Various biotic and abiotic factors affect the relative abundance and the direction of species displacement between F. occidentalis and locally present thrips species [34,41]. Our study showed that interspecific competition was influenced by the host plants, reproduction mode as well as nutrition (honey supply). Feeding on different plants or different stages of the same plant had different effects on the population growth index of F. occidentalis and F. intonsa. In the early stage of F. occidentalis invasion and colonization, the availability of nectar on flowering plants is likely to promote the population growth rate of F. occidentalis.
Some studies indicated that the relative abundances between F. occidentalis and native thrips have been determined by their host plant species differences [34]. F. intonsa and F. occidentalis both are highly polyphagous and frequently co-occurs on various vegetable plants such as kidney bean and pepper [42,43]. On kidney beans, the density of F. intonsa was significantly higher than F. occidentalis [17,44]. F. occidentalis was dominant over F. intonsa on pepper [38,45]. In this study, competition results depended on the host plants. When thrips received fresh lentil pods as food source, competition reduced the growth index of F. occidentalis but not that of F. intonsa. On pepper seedlings, competition increased the population growth index of F. intonsa, while on flowering peppers, the population growth index of F. occidentalis increased
When the host plants were fresh lentil bean pods, interspecific competition did not affect the population growth index of F. intonsa, but the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly affected. Regardless of the presence or absence of honey, the population growth index of F. occidentalis decreased significantly after it was mixed with F. intonsa under both reproductive modes, indicating that interspecific competition was detrimental to the population growth of F. occidentalis, which is consistent with the results from previous studies [34].
When fed on pepper seedlings, there was no significant difference between the growth index of F. occidentalis under sexual reproductive mode with and without mixing with F. intonsa. However, when the two thrip species were mixed under the parthenogenetic reproductive mode, the population growth index of F. occidentalis increased significantly, while the growth index of F. intonsa decreased significantly. When the two thrips were mixed under the sexual reproductive mode, the growth index of F. intonsa increased significantly. These results indicated that during the early stage of F. occidentalis invasion, pepper seedlings are poor host plants. During the later stage of F. occidentalis invasion, F. intonsa exhibited greater ability to adapt to interspecific competitions.
F. occidentalis is flower-dwelling thrips. The population of thrips increased during the flowering period and peaked in the full flowering period [46]. Nutrients in different host plants and flowers have a great impact on the growth and development of thrips [47]. Some studies believe that the proportion of soluble protein and soluble sugar in plants affects the host selection behavior of phytophagous pests. When the content of soluble protein is high, the survival rate, growth and development rate and fertility of pests are relatively improved [48,49]. Soluble sugar is an important nutrient and energy source, which can stimulate insect feeding and promote the oviposition of some species of thrips [50]. In our study, honey supply increases the female-to-male ratio of the progeny of F. occidentalis under sexual reproductive mode cultured on fresh lentil bean pods, and flower emergence increases the growth index of F. occidentalis under sexual reproduction mode.
In our study the presence or absence of honey had no significant effect on the population growth index of the two species of thrips. However, in the presence of honey, the female-to-male ratio in the progeny of F. occidentalis increased significantly after mixing with F. intonsa and under sexual reproductive mode. F. occidentalis has a typical haploid/diploid sex determination system. The increases in the proportion of female progeny indicate that, in the presence of honey, interspecific competitions promoted the mating efficiency of female F. occidentalis. Studies have shown that F. intonsa had a stronger ability to guard honey and fed longer on honey compared to F. occidentalis [34], which would reduce the activity space, thereby increasing the probability of mating and mating efficiency of F. occidentalis. This may explain the increased female-to-male ratio in the progeny of F. occidentalis after it was mixed with F. intonsa and honey is supplied.
When fed on pepper seedlings at the flowering stage, the population growth index of F. intonsa declined significantly in both reproductive modes, while the population growth index of F. occidentalis increased significantly in the sexual reproductive mode, and did not change significantly in the parthenogenetic reproduction mode. These results indicated that the flowering period is important for the promoting the population growth rate and development of F. occidentalis in the early stage of its invasion and colonization. This also may explain the dominance of F. occidentalis populations in areas close to flower markets.
Both parthenogenetic and sexual reproductive modes were used in this study to simulate competition between the two thrip species in both the initial invasion and subsequent colonization phases. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the population growth index of the two reproductive modes when thrips were cultivated on fresh lentil bean pods. Feeding on fresh lentil bean pods in the presence of competition was detrimental to the population development of F. occidentalis, but had no effect on the population development of F. intonsa. On pepper seedlings, the population growth index of F. occidentalis was greater than that of F. intonsa in the presence of competition.
Under non-competitions conditions (single species culture) on pepper seedlings, the population growth index of F. occidentalis was significantly greater than that of F. intonsa in both sexual and parthenogenetic reproductive modes. Under competitions conditions, although the growth index of F. occidentalis was still greater than that of F. intonsa under sexual reproduction mode, the growth index of F. intonsa was significantly increased compared to that under non-competitions conditions. Under the parthenogenetic reproductive mode, there was no significant difference in the growth index between the two kinds of thrips, indicating that interspecific competitions at the seedling stage were beneficial to the growth of F. intonsa, which is inconsistent with previous results [43]. One of the possible reasons is that the initial population used by Gai et al. [43] were adults that have been mating for three days, while this study used unmated adults. Therefore, after populations were mixed in this study, it not only involves the mixing at the oviposition period but also affects the mating process. When male and female thrips coexist, interspecific competitions have a positive effect on the mating and oviposition of F. intonsa. While under the parthenogenetic reproductive mode, interspecific competitions have an obvious negative effect on the growth of F. occidentalis. Further studies are needed to investigate the underlying reasons.
Under non-competitions conditions on pepper seedlings at flowering stage, the population growth index of F. intonsa was significantly greater than (under parthenogenetic reproductive mode) or equal to (under sexual reproductive mode) that of F. occidentalis, indicating that flowering period was more favorable to the growth of F. intonsa. However, under competitions conditions, the population growth index of F. intonsa decreased significantly under both reproductive modes, while the population growth index of F. occidentalis increased significantly under the sexual reproductive mode, indicating that F. occidentalis interfered with the population development of F. intonsa. We found that after the pepper blooms, most of the thrips that occupied the flowers were F. intonsa while F. occidentalis were mainly active on the leaves. This is consistent with previous results showing that F. intonsa had stronger ability to guard honey compared to F. occidentalis [51]. However, such occupation and possession of honey cost more energy, thereby reducing the population growth of F. intonsa.
In conclusion, the outcomes of interspecific competition between the two species of thrips depends on the host species, additional sugar sources, and reproductive mode. The results of this study showed that when fed on fresh lentil bean pods, the interspecific competitions between the two thrips significantly interferes with the population development of F. occidentalis. However, when fed on pepper seedlings, interspecific competition is more beneficial for the population development of F. intonsa during the seedling stage, while the flowering stage is more favorable for the population development of F. occidentalis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-H.Y., Y.-L.G. and B.Z.; methodology, C.-H.Y.; software, Z.L.; validation, C.-Y.L.; formal analysis, C.-H.Y., C.-Y.L. and Z.L.; investigation, F.-J.Q.; resources, T.-X.L.; data curation, F.-J.Q.; writing-original draft preparation, C.-H.Y.; F.-J.Q. and B.Z.; writing-review and editing, C.-H.Y. and B.Z.; visualization, Z.L. and T.-X.L.; supervision, Y.-L.G. and T.-X.L.; project administration, C.-Y.L.; funding acquisition, C.-H.Y. and B.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFD0200802), China, and Qingdao Agricultural University Doctoral Start-Up Fund (663-1119034).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ying Li and Jin-Guang Yang from Institue of Tobacco Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for their advice and help in writing. All authors are very thankful to anonym reviewers to improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, S.; Tang, L.; Zhang, X.; Xing, Z.; Lei, Z.; Gao, Y. A decade of a thrips invasion in China: Lessons learned. Ecotoxicology 2018, 27, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gerin, C.; Hance, T.; Impe, G.V. Demographical parameters of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). J. Appl. Eentomol. 1994, 118, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Funderburk, J.; Stavisky, J.; Olson, S. Predation of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in field peppers by Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Environ. Entomol. 2000, 29, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kirk, W.D.J.; Terry, L.I. The spread of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande). Agr. Forest. Entomol. 2003, 5, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.J.; Wu, Q.J.; Xu, B.Y.; Zhu, G.R. The occurrence and damage of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): A dangerous alien invasive pest in Beijing. Plant. Protect. 2003, 29, 58–59. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, B.; Qian, W.Q.; Qiao, X.; Xi, Y.; Wan, F.H. Invasion biology, ecology, and management of Frankliniella occidentalis in China. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 102, e21613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhi, J.; Fitch, G.K.; Margolies, D.C.; Nechols, J.R. Apple pollen as a supplemental food for the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis: Response of individuals and populations. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2005, 117, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Frantz, G.; Mellinger, H.C. Shifts in western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (thysanoptera: Thripidae), population abundance and crop damage. Fla. Entomol. 2009, 92, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, W.D.; Zhang, P.J.; Zhang, J.M.; Zhang, Z.J.; Huang, F.; Bei, Y.W.; Lin, W.C.; Lu, Y.B. An Evaluation of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Frankliniella intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Performance on Different Plant Leaves Based on Life History Characteristics. J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gai, H.T.; Zhi, J.R.; Yue, Z. Population dynamics of Frankliniella occidentalis and Frankliniella intonsa on pepper. Southwest Chin. J. Agr. Sci. 2012, 25, 337–339. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu, Q.J.; Xu, B.Y.; Zhang, Z.J.; Zhang, Y.J.; Zhu, G.R. The investigation on populations and distribution of thrips in plant in Beijing, Zhejiang province and Yunnan province. Chin. Plant Protect. 2007, 27, 32–33. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, J. Synthesis of A Male-produced Aggregation Pheromones in Frankliniella intonsa and Evaluation of Their Activities. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Moritz, G. Structure, Growth and Development: Trips as Crop Pests; CAB: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 15–63. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding, T.B.; Chi, H.; Gökçe, A.; Gao, Y.L.; Zhang, B. Demographic analysis of arrhenotokous parthenogenesis and bisexual reproduction of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tommasini, M.G.; Maini, S. Frankliniella occidentalis and other thrips harmful to vegetable and ornamental crops in Europe. Biol. Control. Thrips. Pests. 1995, 95, 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  16. Brunner, P.C.; Frey, J.E. Habitat-specific population structure in native western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (insecta, thysanoptera). J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23, 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ullah, M.S.; Lim, U.T. Life History Characteristics of Frankliniella occidentalis and Frankliniella intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Constant and Fluctuating Temperatures. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 1000–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Todd, J.W.; Culbreath, A.K.; Chamberlin, J.R.; Beshear, R.J.; Mullinix, B.G. Colonization and population dynamics of thrips in peanuts in the southern United States. Thrips. Biol. Manag. 1995, 276, 453–460. [Google Scholar]
  19. Joost, H.; Riley, D.G. Sampling techniques for thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in pre-flowering tomato. J. Econ. Entomol. 2004, 97, 1450–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Navas, S.; Funderburk, J.E.; Beshear, R.J.; Olson, S.M.; Mack, T.P. Seasonal patterns of Frankliniella (Thysanoptera:Thripidae) in tomato flowers. J. Econ. Entomol. 1991, 84, 1818–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Riley, D.G.; Angelella, G.M.; Mcpherson, R.M. Pine pollen dehiscence relative to thrips population dynamics. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2011, 138, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Navas, V.; Funderburk, J.E.; Olson, S.M.; Beshear, R.J. Damage to tomato fruit by the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera:Thripidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 1991, 26, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shipp, J.L.; Wang, K.; Binns, M.R. Economic injury levels for western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on greenhouse cucumber. J. Econ. Entomol. 2000, 93, 1732–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Buxton, J.H.; Easterbrook, M.A. Thrips as a probable cause of severe fruit distortion in late-season strawberries. Plant. Pathol. 2010, 37, 278–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wijkamp, J. Virus-Vector Relationships in the Transmission of Tospoviruses. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sakurai, T.; Inoue, T.; Tsuda, S. Distinct efficiencies of Impatiens necrotic spot virus transmission by five thrips vector species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of tospoviruses in Japan. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2004, 39, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nagata, T.; Almeida, A.C.L.; Resende, R.O.; DeAvila, A.C. The competence of four thrips species to transmit and replicate four tospoviruses. Plant Pathol. 2010, 53, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, Y.H.; Zhang, H.R.; Liu, J.; Li, Z.Y. Advances in research on vector thrips species (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 50, 1726–1736. [Google Scholar]
  29. Prins, M.M.; Goldbach, R. The emerging problem of tospovirus infection and nonconventional methods of control. Trends Microbiol. 1998, 6, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Riley, D.G.; Joseph, S.V.; Srinivasan, R.; Diffie, S. Thrips vectors of tospoviruses. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2011, 2, 11–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Reitz, S.R.; Gao, Y.; Kirk, W.; Hoddle, M.S.; Funderburk, J.E. Invasion biology, ecology, and management of western flower thrips. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Gai, H.T.; Zhi, J.R.; Li, Z.X.; Jiang, Y.J. Survival rates of Frankliniella occidentalis and Frankliniella intonsa after exposure to adverse temperature conditions. Chin. J. Ecol. 2010, 29, 1533–1577. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hu, C.X.; Li, Y.R.; Li, Z.Y.; Chen, G.H.; Zhang, H.R.; Gui, F.R.; Zhang, X.M. Effects of imidacloprid on interspecific competition between Frankliniella occidentalis and Frankliniella intonsa and their progeny development. Chin. J. Ecol. 2018, 37, 453–461. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu, S.Y.; Xing, Z.L.; Ma, T.T.; Xu, D.W.; Gao, Y.L. Competitive interaction between Frankliniella occidentalis and locally present thrips species: A global review. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Charlene, J.H.; Judith, H.M. Sex Ratio Patterns and Population Dynamics of Western Flower Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Environ. Entomol. 1992, 21, 322–330. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hansen, E.A.; Funderburk, J.E.; Reitz, S.R.; Ramachandran, S.; Eger, J.E.; McAuslane, H. Within-plant distribution of Frankliniella species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in field pepper. Environ. Entomol. 2003, 32, 1035–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Gerin, C.; Hance, T.; Van-Impe, G. Impact of flowers on the demography of western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 1999, 123, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, X.C.; Li, Z.H.; Cao, Z.Y.; He, S.Q.; Li, Z.Y.; Liu, J.Y.; Gui, F.R. Population dynamics and spatial distribution of thrips on vegetables flowers. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 50, 1628–1636. [Google Scholar]
  39. Paini, D.R.; Funderburk, J.E.; Reitz, S.R. Competitive exclusion of a worldwide invasive pest by a native. Quantifying competition between two phytophagous insects on two host plant species. J. Anim. Ecol. 2008, 77, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Northfield, T.D.; Paini, D.R.; Reitz, S.R.; Funderburk, J.E. Within plant interspecific competition does not limit the highly invasive thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis in florida. Ecol. Entomol. 2011, 36, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sakai, A.K.; Allendorf, F.W.; Holt, J.S.; Lodge, D.M.; Molofsky, J.; With, K.A.; Baughman, S.; Cabin, R.J.; Cohen, J.E.; Ellstrand, N.C.; et al. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32, 305–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lewis, T. Pest thrips in perspective. In Thrips as Crop Pests; Lewis, T., Ed.; CAB International: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gai, H.T.; Zhi, J.R.; Sun, M. Effects of temperature on the survival and fecundity of Frankliniella occidentalis and F. intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Acta Phytophylacica Sin. 2011, 38, 521–526. [Google Scholar]
  44. Alim, M.A.; Song, J.; Seo, H.J.; Choi, J.J. Monitoring thrips species with yellow sticky traps in astringent persimmon orchards in Korea. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2018, 53, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Z.K.; Wu, S.Y.; Lei, Z.R.; Kang, P.Z.; Du, Y.N.; Zhang, L.R. Population competition and occurrence trend of Frankliniella occidentalis and Frankliniella intonsa on Yinchuan greenhouse pepper. Plant Quar. 2019, 33, 13–17. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, T.; Zhi, J.R.; Ye, M.; Zeng, G.; Ye, G.Q. Effect of pepper flowers on the population aboundance of Frankliniella occidentalis. China Plant Protect. 2018, 38, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhou, D.; Zhi, J.R.; Song, J.; Yue, W.B.; Zhang, T.; Zou, J. Effects of Different Foods on Nutrient Contents in Frankliniella Occidentalis. J. Mt. Agric. Biol. 2021, 40, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  48. McNeill, S.; Southwood, T.R.E. Role of nitrogen in the development of insect plant relationships. In Biochemical Aspects of Plant and Animal Convolution; Harbourne, J.B., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1978; pp. 77–98. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mattson, W.J. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1980, 102, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Derridji, S.; Wu, B.R.; Stammitti, L.; Garrec, J.P.; Derrien, A. Chemi-calson the leaf surface: Information about the plant available to insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1996, 80, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bhuyain, M.; Lim, U.T. Interference and Exploitation Competition between Frankliniella occidentalis and Frankliniella intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Laboratory Assays. Fla. Entomol. 2019, 102, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 14 00001 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) The effect of interspecific competition between F. occidentalis (Fo) and F. intonsa (Fi), cultured under sexual reproductive mode without honey, on the growth index of adults (F11,36 = 27.84, p < 0.001). (B) The effect of interspecific competition between Fo and Fi, cultured under sexual reproductive mode with honey, on the growth index of adults (F11,36 = 14.98, p < 0.001). (C) The effect of interspecific competitions on the population growth index of F. occidentalis (Fo) and F. intonsa (Fi) cultured together under parthenogenetic reproductive mode with or without honey (F7,16 = 44.38, p < 0.001). The values are represented as the mean ± SEM. The letters above the columns indicate the comparison among groups, p < 0.05.
Figure 1. (A) The effect of interspecific competition between F. occidentalis (Fo) and F. intonsa (Fi), cultured under sexual reproductive mode without honey, on the growth index of adults (F11,36 = 27.84, p < 0.001). (B) The effect of interspecific competition between Fo and Fi, cultured under sexual reproductive mode with honey, on the growth index of adults (F11,36 = 14.98, p < 0.001). (C) The effect of interspecific competitions on the population growth index of F. occidentalis (Fo) and F. intonsa (Fi) cultured together under parthenogenetic reproductive mode with or without honey (F7,16 = 44.38, p < 0.001). The values are represented as the mean ± SEM. The letters above the columns indicate the comparison among groups, p < 0.05.
Insects 14 00001 g001
Insects 14 00001 g002 550
Figure 2. The effect of interspecific competitions on the female-to-male ratio of progeny of F. occidentalis (Fo) and F. intonsa (Fi) cultured together under sexual reproductive mode with or without honey (F7,24 = 1.57, p = 0.1916). The values are represented as the mean ± SEM. The letters above the columns indicate the comparison among groups, p < 0.05.
Figure 2. The effect of interspecific competitions on the female-to-male ratio of progeny of F. occidentalis (Fo) and F. intonsa (Fi) cultured together under sexual reproductive mode with or without honey (F7,24 = 1.57, p = 0.1916). The values are represented as the mean ± SEM. The letters above the columns indicate the comparison among groups, p < 0.05.
Insects 14 00001 g002
Insects 14 00001 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) The growth index of F. occidentalis (Fo) and F. intonsa (Fi) in non-competition population versus competition population under sexual reproduction mode feeding on pepper at the seedling stage (F3,8 = 148.98, p < 0.001). (B) The growth index of Fo and Fi in a non-competition population versus competition population under sexual reproduction mode feeding on pepper at the flowering stage (F3,8 = 9.11, p = 0.0058). (C) The growth index of Fo and Fi innon-competition population versus competition population under parthenogenetic reproduction mode feeding on pepper at the seedling stage (F3,12 = 11.33, p = 0.0008). (D) The growth index of Fo and Fi in non-competition population versus competition population under parthenogenetic reproduction mode feeding on pepper at the flowering stage (F3,8 = 22.57, p = 0.0003). The values are represented as the mean ± SEM. The letters above the columns indicate the comparison among groups, p < 0.05.
Figure 3. (A) The growth index of F. occidentalis (Fo) and F. intonsa (Fi) in non-competition population versus competition population under sexual reproduction mode feeding on pepper at the seedling stage (F3,8 = 148.98, p < 0.001). (B) The growth index of Fo and Fi in a non-competition population versus competition population under sexual reproduction mode feeding on pepper at the flowering stage (F3,8 = 9.11, p = 0.0058). (C) The growth index of Fo and Fi innon-competition population versus competition population under parthenogenetic reproduction mode feeding on pepper at the seedling stage (F3,12 = 11.33, p = 0.0008). (D) The growth index of Fo and Fi in non-competition population versus competition population under parthenogenetic reproduction mode feeding on pepper at the flowering stage (F3,8 = 22.57, p = 0.0003). The values are represented as the mean ± SEM. The letters above the columns indicate the comparison among groups, p < 0.05.
Insects 14 00001 g003
Table
Table 1. Experimental design.
Table 1. Experimental design.
No.CompetitionNumber of Fo FemalesNumber of Fo MalesNumber of Fi FemalesNumber of Fi MalesFoodSexual ReproductionNumber of Replications
1No201000lentil with honeyYes4
No201000lentil without honeyYes4
No002010lentil with honeyYes4
No002010lentil without honeyYes4
Yes105105lentil with honeyYes4
Yes105105lentil without honeyYes4
2No20000lentil with honeyNo4
No20000lentil without honeyNo3
No00200lentil with honeyNo3
No00200lentil without honeyNo3
Yes100100lentil with honeyNo3
Yes100100lentil without honeyNo3
3No201000pepper seedlings stagesYes3
No201000pepper flowering stagesYes3
No002010pepper seedlings stagesYes3
No002010pepper flowering stagesYes3
Yes105105pepper seedlings stagesYes3
Yes105105pepper flowering stagesYes3
4No30000pepper seedlings stagesNo3
No30000pepper flowering stagesNo3
No00300pepper seedlings stagesNo3
No00300pepper flowering stagesNo3
Yes150150pepper seedlings stagesNo3
Yes150150pepper flowering stagesNo3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, C.-H.; Qiao, F.-J.; Lu, Z.; Li, C.-Y.; Liu, T.-X.; Gao, Y.-L.; Zhang, B. Interspecific Competitions between Frankliniella intonsa and Frankliniella occidentalis on Fresh Lentil Bean Pods and Pepper Plants. Insects 2023, 14, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010001

AMA Style

Yang C-H, Qiao F-J, Lu Z, Li C-Y, Liu T-X, Gao Y-L, Zhang B. Interspecific Competitions between Frankliniella intonsa and Frankliniella occidentalis on Fresh Lentil Bean Pods and Pepper Plants. Insects. 2023; 14(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Chun-Hong, Feng-Jiao Qiao, Zhaozhi Lu, Chang-You Li, Tong-Xian Liu, Yu-Lin Gao, and Bin Zhang. 2023. "Interspecific Competitions between Frankliniella intonsa and Frankliniella occidentalis on Fresh Lentil Bean Pods and Pepper Plants" Insects 14, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010001

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop