Detection of Pneumothorax in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome—Lung Ultrasound Pitfalls
by
, , and
Konrad Mendrala
1,*,
Sylweriusz Kosiński
2,
Tomasz Czober
1,
Paweł Podsiadło
3,
Szymon Skoczyński
4 and
Tomasz Darocha
1 1
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
2
Department of Intensive Interdisciplinary Therapy, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
3
Department of Emergency Medicine, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland
4
Department of Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(2), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020206
Submission received: 22 December 2023
/
Revised: 12 January 2024
/
Accepted: 15 January 2024
/
Published: 18 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Lung Ultrasound)
Abstract
:Lung ultrasound is gaining popularity as a quick, easy, and accurate method for the detection of pneumothorax. The typical sonographic features of pneumothorax are the absence of lung sliding, the presence of a lung point, the absence of a lung pulse, and the absence of B-lines. However, we found that in some cases, each of these elements might be misleading.
The extensive range of diagnostic capability of ultrasound system has made the bedside ultrasound an indispensable diagnostic element [1]. Characterized by high sensitivity and specificity, the accuracy of ultrasound in detecting pneumothorax exceeds chest radiograph [2]. The detection of pleural sliding is fundamental, and a careful assessment should be based primarily on B-mode images.
The mechanical ventilation of ARDS patients is likely to make it challenging due to high PEEP and small tidal volumes. Therefore, the absence of pleural sliding cannot be the only symptom determining the diagnosis of pneumothorax. In cases of diminished lung sliding, a high-frequency linear transducer should be used to better visualize the pleura. Alternatively, M-mode combined with real-time ECG may be useful to search for the so-called lung pulse. A “pseudo” lung pulse may result from intercostal muscle contraction in a spontaneously breathing patient, but unlike a real lung pulse, it starts above the pleural line, passes down crossing it, and does not correlate with the heart rate (Figure 1A; Video S1A) [3].
In hydropneumothorax, a typical lung point (Figure 1B; Video S1B) should be distinguished from a sign called the hydro-point (Figure 2; Video S2), where the air/fluid border appears as the interposition between an anechoic space and a non-sliding A-pattern [4]. The observed phenomenon resembles a curtain sign, but unlike the typical one, it can be seen in various areas of the chest wall, not only the base. Also, searching for the lung point can be difficult, time-consuming, or even impossible when the whole lung is collapsed.
According to the literature, “the presence of subpleural artifacts rules out pneumothorax in 100%”. We would rather agree on 99%. Comet tails artifacts may result from the presence of pleural adhesions in the pneumothorax chamber or ruptured bullous emphysema, which imitate the physiological connective tissue septa (Figure 3A,B; Video S3A,B) [5]. Also, subcutaneous emphysema is particularly disruptive to a lung ultrasound as it may obscure both normal structures and mimic other pathologies. In the area of subcutaneous emphysema, LUS may completely lose diagnostic value and should be interpreted with extreme caution. The presence of air in the subcutaneous tissue can mimic the A-profile as well as B-profile and subpleural consolidations (Figure 3C–E). For this reason, it is crucial to position the probe transversely to the ribs and correctly identify the anatomical landmarks.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics14020206/s1, Video S1A. A 59-year-old male with ARDS, mechanically ventilated (Bilevel; FiO2 60%; PL10 cmH2O; PH15 cmH2O). Point-of-care LUS using a 1.8–6 MHz convex probe in B-mode shows extensive intercostal muscle (ICM) contraction, questionable pleural sliding (arrow), and horizontal reverberation artifacts formed on the air/tissue boundary (dashed arrow). In M-mode, a barcode sign with vertical artifacts is observed (asterisk). Unlike a real lung pulse, the artifacts originate from the intercostal muscles, above the pleural line. Video S1B. Point-of-care LUS using a 1.8–6 MHz convex probe. On the left side of the LUS image, pneumothorax is visible with abolished lung sliding (dashed arrow) and no vertical reverberation artifacts. A part of the lung with fragmented pleural line (arrow) and subpleural consolidation (dashed line) appears suddenly and transiently on the right side of the ultrasound image. The contact area is called the lung point (triangle). Video S2. A 59-year-old smoker with COPD and severe ARDS. All pictures were obtained with a 1.8–6 MHz convex probe during vv-ECMO therapy and baby lung ventilation (Bilevel; FiO2 40%; PL10 cmH2O; PH 5 cmH2O; Vt~100–150 mL). On the left side of the LUS image, pneumothorax can be observed, with an irregular line of the parietal pleura (dashed arrow), abolished pleural sliding, and no horizontal reverberations developed at the air/tissue boundary. A cyclically appearing fluid (asterisk) and a lung with a visible irregular pleural line (arrow) and consolidation (dashed line) can be seen on the right side. The contact point of both is called the hydro-point (triangle). Video S3. A 24-year-old male with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and ARDS due to suspected atypical bacterial pneumonia. Ventilated with guaranteed tidal volume (Bilevel Volume Guarantee; FiO2 100%; Vt 400 mL; PEEP 6 cmH2O; PIP 30 cmH2O). Point-of-care LUS with a 1.8–6 MHz convex probe. Image of blurred and fragmented pleural line (arrow) with visible subpleural consolidations (dashed lines). In addition, coexisting horizontal pleural reverberations (dashed arrow) with abolished pleural sliding and comet tail artifacts (asterisks) most likely emerging from subpleural structures. The image corresponds to the bullous emphysema in the CT scan, as shown in Figure 3B.
Author Contributions
K.M.: research design, data collection, video analysis, video clip editing, literature analysis, and writing the article; S.K.: data collection, video analysis, literature analysis, and writing the article; T.C.: data collection, video analysis, literature analysis, and writing the article; P.P.: video analysis, literature analysis, and writing the article; S.S.: video analysis, literature analysis, and writing the article; T.D.: video analysis, literature analysis, and writing the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Buda, N.; Mendrala, K.; Skoczyński, S.; Pasquier, M.; Mazur, P.; Garcia, E.; Darocha, T. Basics of Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasonography. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 389, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hendin, A.; Koenig, S.; Millington, S.J. Better with Ultrasound: Thoracic Ultrasound. Chest 2020, 158, 2082–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koenig, S.; Mayo, P.; Volpicelli, G.; Millington, S.J. Lung Ultrasound Scanning for Respiratory Failure in Acutely Ill Patients. Chest 2020, 158, 2511–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Volpicelli, G.; Boero, E.; Stefanone, V.; Storti, E. Unusual New Signs of Pneumothorax at Lung Ultrasound. Crit. Ultrasound J. 2013, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lichtenstein, D.A. Lung Ultrasound in the Critically Ill: The BLUE Protocol; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-15370-4. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
Point-of-care lung ultrasound of a 59-year-old male with severe ARDS, mechanically ventilated (Bilevel; FiO2 60%; PL10 cmH2O; PH15 cmH2O). A left-sided pneumothorax occurred after pacemaker implantation. The study was performed using a 1.8–6 MHz convex probe. (A) Muscle contractions imitate lung pulse and hinder the diagnosis of pneumothorax. LUS examination revealed horizontal reverberation artifacts (dashed arrows). M-mode image shows a barcode sign with visible vertical artifacts (asterisks). Unlike a real lung pulse, the artifacts originate from the intercostal muscles (ICMs). Therefore, they start superficially to the pleural line and move down, passing the pleural line (solid arrow). Please see Video S1. (B) Lung point is a pathognomonic sign of pneumothorax and can be fully seen in Video S1B. This static image shows both pleural laminae separated from each other. As a result of pneumothorax, only the parietal pleura is visible on the left side (indicated with a dashed arrow). On the right side, a part of the lung with fragmented pleural line (solid arrow) and subpleural consolidation (dashed line) can be seen. The contact area is called the lung point (triangle).
Figure 1.
Point-of-care lung ultrasound of a 59-year-old male with severe ARDS, mechanically ventilated (Bilevel; FiO2 60%; PL10 cmH2O; PH15 cmH2O). A left-sided pneumothorax occurred after pacemaker implantation. The study was performed using a 1.8–6 MHz convex probe. (A) Muscle contractions imitate lung pulse and hinder the diagnosis of pneumothorax. LUS examination revealed horizontal reverberation artifacts (dashed arrows). M-mode image shows a barcode sign with visible vertical artifacts (asterisks). Unlike a real lung pulse, the artifacts originate from the intercostal muscles (ICMs). Therefore, they start superficially to the pleural line and move down, passing the pleural line (solid arrow). Please see Video S1. (B) Lung point is a pathognomonic sign of pneumothorax and can be fully seen in Video S1B. This static image shows both pleural laminae separated from each other. As a result of pneumothorax, only the parietal pleura is visible on the left side (indicated with a dashed arrow). On the right side, a part of the lung with fragmented pleural line (solid arrow) and subpleural consolidation (dashed line) can be seen. The contact area is called the lung point (triangle).
Figure 2.
Point-of-care LUS of a 59-year-old smoker with COPD and severe ARDS. LUS was obtained with 1.8–6 MHz convex probe during vv-ECMO therapy and baby lung ventilation (Bilevel; FiO2 40%; PL10 cmH2O; PH 5 cmH2O; Vt~100–150 mL). Considering the LUS images obtained in the previous days (bilateral consolidations), the A-profile on the left side of chest wall was unusual. A careful assessment with LUS revealed the hydro-point, where a pleural effusion in the left pleural cavity coexisted with pneumothorax. Pneumothorax is present on the left side of the image with a blurred line of the parietal pleura (dashed arrow), and no horizontal reverberations developed at the air/tissue boundary. On the right side of the image, fluid in the pleural cavity (asterisk) and irregular, fragmented pleural line (solid arrow) with the subpleural consolidation (dashed line) can be observed. The contact point of both is called hydro-point (triangle), one of the non-typical LUS images confirming the presence of pneumothorax. This dynamic sign, occurring suddenly and transiently on the ultrasound image, can be seen in Video S2.
Figure 2.
Point-of-care LUS of a 59-year-old smoker with COPD and severe ARDS. LUS was obtained with 1.8–6 MHz convex probe during vv-ECMO therapy and baby lung ventilation (Bilevel; FiO2 40%; PL10 cmH2O; PH 5 cmH2O; Vt~100–150 mL). Considering the LUS images obtained in the previous days (bilateral consolidations), the A-profile on the left side of chest wall was unusual. A careful assessment with LUS revealed the hydro-point, where a pleural effusion in the left pleural cavity coexisted with pneumothorax. Pneumothorax is present on the left side of the image with a blurred line of the parietal pleura (dashed arrow), and no horizontal reverberations developed at the air/tissue boundary. On the right side of the image, fluid in the pleural cavity (asterisk) and irregular, fragmented pleural line (solid arrow) with the subpleural consolidation (dashed line) can be observed. The contact point of both is called hydro-point (triangle), one of the non-typical LUS images confirming the presence of pneumothorax. This dynamic sign, occurring suddenly and transiently on the ultrasound image, can be seen in Video S2.
Figure 3.
Point-of-care LUS image of 24-year-old male with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, ARDS, and suspected atypical bacterial pneumonia. Patient was ventilated with guaranteed tidal volume (Bilevel Volume Guarantee; FiO2 100%; Vt 400 mL; PEEP 6 cmH2O; PIP 30 cmH2O). The study was performed using a 1.8–6 MHz convex probe. Presence of comet tail artifacts imitating B-lines carries a high risk of improper pneumothorax exclusion. (A) A-profile with blurred, fragmented pleural line (solid arrow), horizontal reverberations (dashed arrows), and disseminated subpleural consolidations (dashed lines). Note comet tail artifacts emerging most likely from subpleural structures (asterisks). Please refer also to Video S3. (B) CT image shows advanced bullous emphysema (asterisks), massive consolidations (dashed arrows), and diffused ground-glass opacification (solid arrows). The probe position is marked with a triangle. (C) LUS image of horizontal artifacts similar to A-line (solid arrows) and (D) hypoechoic vertical artifacts mimicking B-lines (asterisks) in some way, limiting the utility of ultrasound in pneumothorax detection. Note the ribs and rib shadows are not visible; the pleural line is not visible. (E) The LUS image corresponds to subcutaneous emphysema in the upper part of the chest wall in CT scan (solid arrow). The probe position is marked with a triangle.
Figure 3.
Point-of-care LUS image of 24-year-old male with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, ARDS, and suspected atypical bacterial pneumonia. Patient was ventilated with guaranteed tidal volume (Bilevel Volume Guarantee; FiO2 100%; Vt 400 mL; PEEP 6 cmH2O; PIP 30 cmH2O). The study was performed using a 1.8–6 MHz convex probe. Presence of comet tail artifacts imitating B-lines carries a high risk of improper pneumothorax exclusion. (A) A-profile with blurred, fragmented pleural line (solid arrow), horizontal reverberations (dashed arrows), and disseminated subpleural consolidations (dashed lines). Note comet tail artifacts emerging most likely from subpleural structures (asterisks). Please refer also to Video S3. (B) CT image shows advanced bullous emphysema (asterisks), massive consolidations (dashed arrows), and diffused ground-glass opacification (solid arrows). The probe position is marked with a triangle. (C) LUS image of horizontal artifacts similar to A-line (solid arrows) and (D) hypoechoic vertical artifacts mimicking B-lines (asterisks) in some way, limiting the utility of ultrasound in pneumothorax detection. Note the ribs and rib shadows are not visible; the pleural line is not visible. (E) The LUS image corresponds to subcutaneous emphysema in the upper part of the chest wall in CT scan (solid arrow). The probe position is marked with a triangle.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Mendrala, K.; Kosiński, S.; Czober, T.; Podsiadło, P.; Skoczyński, S.; Darocha, T. Detection of Pneumothorax in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome—Lung Ultrasound Pitfalls. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020206
AMA Style
Mendrala K, Kosiński S, Czober T, Podsiadło P, Skoczyński S, Darocha T. Detection of Pneumothorax in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome—Lung Ultrasound Pitfalls. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(2):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020206
Chicago/Turabian StyleMendrala, Konrad, Sylweriusz Kosiński, Tomasz Czober, Paweł Podsiadło, Szymon Skoczyński, and Tomasz Darocha. 2024. "Detection of Pneumothorax in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome—Lung Ultrasound Pitfalls" Diagnostics 14, no. 2: 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020206
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
