Next Article in Journal
Hybridization of Deep Learning Pre-Trained Models with Machine Learning Classifiers and Fuzzy Min–Max Neural Network for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Are We on the Path to Avoiding the Administration of Contrast Media?
Previous Article in Journal
Chitotriosidase and Neopterin as Two Novel Potential Biomarkers for Advanced Stage and Survival Prediction in Gastric Cancer—A Pilot Study
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Primary Lymphoproliferative Lung Diseases: Imaging and Multidisciplinary Approach

Diagnostics 2023, 13(7), 1360; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071360
by Luca Gozzi 1, Diletta Cozzi 1,2,*, Edoardo Cavigli 1, Chiara Moroni 1, Caterina Giannessi 1, Giulia Zantonelli 1, Olga Smorchkova 1, Ron Ruzga 1, Ginevra Danti 1, Elena Bertelli 1, Valentina Luzzi 3, Valeria Pasini 4 and Vittorio Miele 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Diagnostics 2023, 13(7), 1360; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071360
Submission received: 7 March 2023 / Revised: 2 April 2023 / Accepted: 4 April 2023 / Published: 6 April 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of lymphoproliferative disorders of the lung, radiological features, and diagnosis. The paper is well-organized and easy to follow. The authors have provided an extensive list of references, which indicates that they have thoroughly researched the topic. Overall, this paper is a valuable contribution to the literature on lymphoproliferative disorders of the lung. With a few minor revisions, it could be an even stronger resource for clinicians and researchers.

Author Response

Thank you for the revision, we have improved the English language.

Reviewer 2 Report

Well written review of a rare topic. Main focus is on HRCT findings. The article would increase interest, if the described findings are put together in an algorithm or a tabel to have the information in condensed way. In addition, diagnosis of lymphomatous diseases (especially the rare ones) is based on tissue. In lymphoma diagnosis, size of biopsy matters much more than in solid cancer. Therefore more should be said about the method to gain sufficient material in the different entities (transthoracal biopsy, transbronchial biopsy, BAL, surgery). My suggestion would be a table:

Entity -> typcial radiological findings -> method to get material -> pathology

or if you start from the radiologic finding:

typical finding -> possible entitiy and non lymphoid DD -> method to get material -> pathology

 

some typos: page 2: 500-600 studies? reports; page 5: citation [3,33,36,465-47]?; page 7 laboratoristic?; figure 5 interstial?; page 9 tipically? 

Author Response

Thank you for the revision, we have improved the English language and some spelling errors. Moreover, we added a table (as suggested) and a paragraph about interventional methods (BAL, biopsy, criobiopsy, surgery).

Back to TopTop