# Analytical and Numerical Simulations of a Delay Model: The Pantograph Delay Equation

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Analytic Solution at $\mathit{c}\in \mathbb{R}$, $\mathit{c}\ne \pm \mathbf{1}$

#### The Solution in Simplest Form

## 3. Convergence Analysis

**Theorem**

**1.**

**Proof.**

**Theorem**

**2.**

**Proof.**

**Lemma**

**1.**

**Proof.**

**Remark**

**1.**

## 4. Exact Solution at $\mathit{c}=-\mathbf{1}$

## 5. Results

#### 5.1. $c\in (-1,1)$, $\left|\frac{b}{a}\right|<1$, $a\in \mathbb{R}-\left\{0\right\}$

#### 5.2. $c>1$, $a<0$, $b\in \mathbb{R}$

#### 5.3. $c=-1$, $a,b\in \mathbb{R}$

#### 5.4. $a=-1,\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}b=c=\frac{1}{q},\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}q>1$

## 6. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Fox, L.; Mayers, D.F.; Ockendon, J.R.; Tayler, A.B. On a Functional Differential Equation. IMA J. Appl. Math.
**1971**, 8, 271–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kato, T.; McLeod, J.B. The functional-differential equation y
^{′}(x) = ay(λx) + by(x). Bull. Am. Math. Soc.**1971**, 77, 891–935. [Google Scholar] - Derfel, G.; Iserles, A. The pantograph equation in the complex plane. J. Math. Anal. Appl.
**1997**, 213, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Iserles, A. On the generalized pantograph functional differential equation. Eur. J. Appl. Math.
**1993**, 4, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Marshall, J.; van-Brunt, B.; Wake, G. Natural boundaries for solutions to a certain class of functional differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.
**2002**, 268, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Basse, B.; Baguley, B.; Marshall, E.; Joseph, W.; van Brunt, B.; Wake, G.; Wall, D. Modelling cell death in human tumour cell lines exposed to the anticancer drug paclitaxel. J. Math. Biol.
**2004**, 49, 329–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hall, A.J.; Wake, G.C. A functional differential equation arising in the modelling of cell-growth. J. Aust. Math. Soc. Ser. B
**1989**, 30, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Hall, A.J.; Wake, G.C. A functional differential equation determining steady size distributions for populations of cells growing exponentially. J. Aust. Math. Soc. Ser. B
**1990**, 31, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Gaver, D.P. An absorption probability problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl.
**1964**, 9, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Ambartsumian, V.A. On the fluctuation of the brightness of the milky way. Doklady Akad Nauk USSR
**1994**, 44, 223–226. [Google Scholar] - Patade, J.; Bhalekar, S. On Analytical Solution of Ambartsumian Equation. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett.
**2017**, 40, 291–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alharbi, F.M.; Ebaid, A. New Analytic Solution for Ambartsumian Equation. J. Math. Syst. Sci.
**2018**, 8, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bakodah, H.O.; Ebaid, A. Exact solution of Ambartsumian delay differential equation and comparison with Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari approximate method. Mathematics
**2018**, 6, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Khaled, S.M.; El-Zahar, E.R.; Ebaid, A. Solution of Ambartsumian delay differential equation with conformable derivative. Mathematics
**2019**, 7, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kumar, D.; Singh, J.; Baleanu, D.; Rathore, S. Analysis of a fractional model of the Ambartsumian equation. Eur. Phys. J. Plus.
**2018**, 133, 133–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kac, V.G.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Ebaid, A.; Al-Jeaid, H.K. On the exact solution of the functional differential equation y
^{′}(t) = ay(t) + by(-t). Adv. Differ. Equ. Control Process.**2022**, 26, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ruan, S. Delay Differential Equations In Single Species Dynamics. In Delay Differential Equations and Applications; NATO Science Series; Arino, O., Hbid, M., Dads, E.A., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousef, F.; Alkam, O.; Saker, I. The dynamics of new motion styles in the time-dependent four-body problem: Weaving periodic solutions. Eur. Phys. J. Plus.
**2020**, 135, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Folly-Gbetoula, M.; Nyirenda, D. A generalised two-dimensional system of higher order recursive sequences. J. Differ. Equ. Appl.
**2020**, 26, 244–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Plots of the approximate solutions ${\varphi}_{m}\left(t\right),\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}m=3,5,7,9$ in Equation (38) vs. t at $\lambda =1$, $c=\frac{1}{2}$, $b=1$, and $a=-2$.

**Figure 2.**Plots of the approximate solutions ${\varphi}_{m}\left(t\right),\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}m=3,5,7,9$ in Equation (38) vs. t at $\lambda =1$, $c=\frac{1}{2}$, $b=1$, and $a=2$.

**Figure 3.**Plots of the approximate solutions ${\varphi}_{m}\left(t\right),\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}m=3,5,7,9$ in Equation (38) vs. t at $\lambda =1$, $c=-\frac{1}{2}$, $b=1$, and $a=-2$.

**Figure 4.**Plots of the approximate solutions ${\varphi}_{m}\left(t\right),\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}m=3,5,7,9$ in Equation (38) vs. t at $\lambda =1$, $c=-\frac{1}{2}$, $b=1$, and $a=2$.

**Figure 5.**Plots of the approximate solutions ${\varphi}_{m}\left(t\right),\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}m=3,4,5,6$ in Equation (39) vs. t at $\lambda =1$, $c=\frac{3}{2}$, $b=1$, and $a=-2$.

**Figure 6.**Plots of the approximate solutions ${\varphi}_{m}\left(t\right),\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}m=5,6,7,8$ in Equation (39) vs. t at $\lambda =1$, $c=\frac{3}{2}$, $b=3$, and $a=-3$.

**Figure 7.**Plots of the approximate solutions ${\varphi}_{m}\left(t\right),\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}m=3,4,5,6$ in Equation (39) vs. t at $\lambda =1$, $c=\frac{5}{2}$, $b=3$, and $a=-2$.

**Figure 8.**Plots of the approximate solutions ${\varphi}_{m}\left(t\right),\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}m=1,2,3,4$ in Equation (39) vs. t at $\lambda =1$, $c=5$, $b=-1$, and $a=-5$.

**Figure 9.**Plots of the exact solution in Equation (35) vs. t at different values of $\lambda $ when $a=1$ and $b=0$.

**Figure 10.**Plots of the exact solution in Equation (36) vs. t at different values of $\lambda $ when $a=0$ and $b=1$.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

El-Zahar, E.R.; Ebaid, A.
Analytical and Numerical Simulations of a Delay Model: The Pantograph Delay Equation. *Axioms* **2022**, *11*, 741.
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11120741

**AMA Style**

El-Zahar ER, Ebaid A.
Analytical and Numerical Simulations of a Delay Model: The Pantograph Delay Equation. *Axioms*. 2022; 11(12):741.
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11120741

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

El-Zahar, Essam Roshdy, and Abdelhalim Ebaid.
2022. "Analytical and Numerical Simulations of a Delay Model: The Pantograph Delay Equation" *Axioms* 11, no. 12: 741.
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11120741