Next Article in Journal
New Results about Fuzzy Differential Subordinations Associated with Pascal Distribution
Next Article in Special Issue
Symmetries of the Energy–Momentum Tensor for Static Plane Symmetric Spacetimes
Previous Article in Journal
Automatic Brain Tumor Detection and Volume Estimation in Multimodal MRI Scans via a Symmetry Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Symmetry Analysis for the 2D Aw-Rascle Traffic-Flow Model of Multi-Lane Motorways in the Euler and Lagrange Variables
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of the Poly-Jindalrae and Poly-Gaenari Polynomials in Terms of Degenerate Functions

1
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Ha’il, Ha’il 2440, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep TR-27010, Türkiye
4
Department of Basic Sciences, Deanship of Preparatory Year, University of Ha’il, Ha’il 2440, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(8), 1587; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081587
Submission received: 17 July 2023 / Revised: 8 August 2023 / Accepted: 11 August 2023 / Published: 15 August 2023

Abstract

:
The fundamental aim of this paper is to introduce the concept of poly-Jindalrae and poly-Gaenari numbers and polynomials within the context of degenerate functions. Furthermore, we give explicit expressions for these polynomial sequences and establish combinatorial identities that incorporate these polynomials. This includes the derivation of Dobinski-like formulas, recurrence relations, and other related aspects. Additionally, we present novel explicit expressions and identities of unipoly polynomials that are closely linked to some special numbers and polynomials.

1. Introduction and Definitions

Focusing on the theory of special polynomials, several mathematicians have extensively studied the works and various generalizations of Bernoulli polynomials, Euler polynomials, Genocchi polynomials, and Cauchy polynomials (see [1,2,3,4,5,6] for more information). The importance of generalization of the special polynomials encompass a range of specialized polynomial families, offering a unified methodology for addressing a wide array of mathematical questions. They prove valuable not only in theoretical realms, but also in practical applications, enhancing our grasp of fundamental mathematical concepts and furnishing sophisticated resolutions to complex problems in disciplines like calculus, number theory, and physics. Moreover, recent years have witnessed a surge in research on various degenerate versions of special polynomials and numbers, reigniting the interest of mathematicians in diverse categories of special polynomials and numbers [2,7,8,9,10]. Notably, Kim and Kim [11] as well as Dolgy and Khan [12] revisited the polyexponential functions in connection with polylogarithm functions, building upon the foundational work initiated by Hardy [13].
The objective of this paper is to investigate the poly-Jindalrae and poly-Gaenari polynomials and numbers in relation to the Jindalrae–Stirling numbers of the first and second kinds, and to derive arithmetic and combinatorial findings concerning these polynomials and numbers. Initially, we define the Jindalrae–Stirling numbers of the first and second kinds as extensions of the degenerate Stirling numbers, and establish several polynomial relationships involving these special numbers. Subsequently, we introduce the Jindalrae and poly-Gaenari numbers and polynomials, providing explicit expressions and identities associated with them.
Let n be nonnegative integer. The Stirling numbers of the first kind can be characterized (see [14,15]) as
( x ) n = l = 0 n S 1 ( l , n ) x l ,
where ( x ) 0 = 1 , ( x ) n = x ( x 1 ) ( x n + 1 ) , ( n 1 ) .
The Stirling numbers of the second kind can also be characterized (see [4,16]) by
x n = l = 0 n S 2 ( l , n ) ( x ) l .
By (1) and (2), we obtain
1 k ! ( e t 1 ) k = l = n S 2 ( l , n ) t l l ! ( n 0 )
and
1 k ! ( log ( 1 + t ) ) k = l = n S 1 ( l , n ) t l l ! ( n 0 ) .
The generating function of the Bell polynomials are given (see [5]) by
e x ( e t 1 ) = n = 0 B e l n ( x ) t n n ! .
When x = 1 , B e l n = B e l n ( 1 ) are called the Bell numbers.
The degenerate exponential function is defined (see [4,5,9,14,15,16,17,18]) by
e λ x ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) x λ e λ ( t ) = e λ 1 ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ λ R .
Here we note that
e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 ( x ) n , λ t n n ! ,
where ( x ) 0 , λ = 1 , ( x ) n , λ = x ( x λ ) ( x 2 λ ) ( x ( n 1 ) λ ) , ( n 1 ) .
In [1,2], Carlitz introduced the Euler polynomials in their degenerate form, which can be represented as
2 e λ ( t ) + 1 e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 E n , λ ( x ) t n n ! .
On setting x = 0 , E n , λ = E n , λ ( 0 ) are called degenerate Euler numbers.
The degenerate Genocchi polynomials are defined (see [4,14]) by
2 t e λ ( t ) + 1 e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 G n , λ ( x ) t n n ! .
where x = 0 , G n , λ = G n , λ ( 0 ) are called the degenerate Genocchi numbers.
For k Z , the modified degenerate polyexponential function [4] is defined by Kim-Kim to be
Ei k , λ ( x ) = n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ x n ( n 1 ) ! n k ( x < 1 ) .
Note that
Ei 1 , λ ( x ) = n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ x n n ! = e λ ( x ) 1 .
The degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials are defined (see [16]) by
Ei k , λ log λ ( 1 + t ) e λ ( t ) 1 e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 β n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! ( k Z ) .
In the case when x = 0 , β n , λ ( k ) = β n , λ ( k ) ( 0 ) are called the degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers.
The degenerate poly-Genocchi polynomials are defined (see [4]) by
2 Ei k , λ log λ ( 1 + t ) e λ ( t ) + 1 e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 G n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! ( k Z ) .
In the case when x = 0 , G n , λ ( k ) = G n , λ ( k ) ( 0 ) are called the degenerate poly-Genocchi numbers.
Kim-Kim [15] introduced the degenerate poly-Bell polynomials and numbers as follows
1 + Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ) = n = 0 b e l n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .
When x = 1 , b e l n , λ ( k ) = b e l n , λ ( k ) ( 0 ) are called the degenerate poly-Bell numbers.
Let log λ ( t ) be the compositional inverse of e λ ( t ) , called the degenerate logarithm function, such that log λ ( e λ ( t ) ) = e λ ( log λ t ) = t . Then, we note that (see [3])
log λ ( 1 + t ) = 1 λ ( ( 1 + t ) λ 1 ) = n = 1 λ n 1 ( 1 ) n , 1 λ t n n ! .
From (15), we obtain lim λ 0 log λ ( 1 + t ) = log ( 1 + t ) .
In [10], the degenerate Stirling numbers of the first kind are defined by
( x ) n = l = 0 n S 1 , λ ( n , l ) ( x ) l , λ .
As an inversion formula of (16), the degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind are defined (see [10]) by
( x ) n , λ = k = 0 n S 2 , λ ( n , k ) ( x ) k , ( n 0 ) .
By (16) and (17), we obtain (see [16])
1 k ! ( log λ ( 1 + z ) ) k = j = k S 1 , λ ( j , k ) z j j ! , ( k 0 )
and
1 k ! ( e λ ( z ) 1 ) k = j = k S 2 , λ ( j , k ) z j j ! ( k 0 ) .
The degenerate Bell polynomials B n , λ are defined (see [5]) by
e λ x ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) = n = 0 B n , λ ( x ) t n n ! ,
so that
B n , λ = k = 0 n ( x ) k , λ S 2 , λ ( n , k ) ( n 0 ) .
When x = 1 , B n , λ = B n , λ ( 1 ) are called the degenerate Bell numbers.
For k 0 , the Jindalrae–Stirling numbers of the first kind and second kind are given (see [19]) by
1 k ! log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) + 1 ) k = n = k S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , k ) t n n !
and
1 k ! e λ ( e λ 1 ) 1 k = n = k S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , k ) t n n ! .
In [19], Kim et al. introduced Jindalrae and Gaenari polynomials defined by
e λ x ( e λ ( e λ 1 ) 1 ) ) = n = 0 J n , λ ( x ) t n n !
and
e λ x ( log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) + 1 ) ) = n = 0 G n , λ ( x ) t n n ! .
When x = 1 , J n , λ = J n , λ ( 1 ) and G n , λ = G n , λ ( 1 ) are called the Jindalrae and Gaenari numbers.
Kim-Kim [11] defined the unipoly function attached to polynomials p ( x ) by
u k ( x | p ) = n = 1 p ( n ) n k x n , ( k Z ) .
Moreover,
u k ( x | 1 ) = n = 1 x n n k = Li k ( x )
is the ordinary polylogarithm function (see [7]).
The degenerate unipoly function attached to polynomials p ( x ) is as follows (see [3])
u k , λ ( x | p ) = i = 1 p ( i ) ( 1 ) i , λ i k x i .
It is worthy to note that
u k , λ x | 1 / Γ = Ei k , λ ( x )
is the modified degenerate polyexponential function.
This paper is structured as follows. Section 1 provides an overview of essential concepts that are fundamental, including the degenerate exponential functions, degenerate logarithm function, degenerate Stirling numbers of the first and second kinds, and degenerate Bell numbers. It is important to note that the degenerate poly-Bell polynomials b e l n , λ ( k ) ( x ) (refer to [15]) differ from the degenerate Bell polynomials b e l n , λ ( x ) discussed in [5], and the new type degenerate Bell polynomials B e l n , λ ( x ) introduced in [5].
In Section 2, we introduce poly-Jindalrae and poly-Gaenari polynomials as extensions of the Jindalrae and Gaenari polynomials. We establish connections between these special numbers, degenerate Stirling numbers of the first and second kinds, and degenerate Bell numbers and polynomials. Furthermore, we define poly-Jindalrae numbers and polynomials as extensions of the degenerate Bell numbers and polynomials. We derive explicit expressions and identities involving these numbers and polynomials, Jindalrae–Stirling numbers of the first and second kinds, degenerate Stirling numbers of the first and second kinds, and degenerate Bell polynomials.
In Section 3, we introduce the degenerate unipoly-Jindalrae and unipoly-Gaenari polynomials by utilizing the degenerate unipoly functions associated with polynomials p ( x ) . We provide explicit expressions and identities involving these polynomials.

2. Degenerate Poly-Jindalrae and Poly-Gaenari Polynomials and Numbers

In this section, we define the degenerate poly-Jindalrae and poly-Gaenari polynomials by using of the degenerate polyexponential functions and represent the Jindalrae and Gaenari numbers (more precisely, the values of ordinary degenerate Bell polynomials at 1) when k = 1 . At the same time, we give explicit expressions and identities involving those polynomials.
Motivated and inspired by Equation (23), for k Z , we consider the degenerate poly-Jindalrae polynomials by
1 + Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = n = 0 J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! ,
and J 0 , λ ( k ) ( x ) = 1 .
In the special case when x = 1 , J n , λ ( k ) = J n , λ ( k ) ( 1 ) are called the degenerate poly-Jindalrae numbers.
By k = 1 in (29), we note that
1 + Ei 1 , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = 1 + n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ [ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ) ] n ( n 1 ) ! n !
  = n = 0 ( 1 ) n , λ [ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ) ] n ( n 1 ) ! n !
= n = 0 J n , λ ( x ) t n n ! .
Combining with (29) and (30), we have
J n , λ ( 1 ) ( x ) = J n , λ ( x ) .
When λ 0 ,
Ei k ( x ( e ( e t 1 ) 1 ) ) + 1 = n = 0 J n ( k ) ( x ) t n n !
are called the poly-Jindalrae polynomials.
When x = 1 , J n ( k ) = J n ( k ) ( 1 ) are called the poly-Jindalrae numbers.
Theorem 1. 
For k Z , we have
J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = m = 1 n l = 1 m ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( n , m ) .
Proof. 
From (9) and (29), we note that
Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 [ e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ] l l !
= l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 m = l S 2 , λ ( m , l ) [ e λ ( t ) 1 ] m m !
= m = 1 l = 1 m ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 S 2 , λ ( m , l ) n = m S 2 , λ ( n , m ) t n n !
= n = 1 m = 1 n l = 1 m ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( n , m ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by Equations (29) and (33), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 2. 
Let k Z and n 0 ; we have
J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = m = 1 n ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , l ) .
Proof. 
From (22) and (29), we have
Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 [ e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ] l l !
= l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 n = l S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , l ) t n n !
= n = 1 m = 1 n ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , l ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by Equations (29) and (35), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 3. 
Let k Z and n 0 ; we have
b e l n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = l = 0 n J l , λ ( k ) ( x ) S 1 , λ ( n , m ) .
Proof. 
Replacing t with log λ ( 1 + t ) in (29), we obtain
1 + Ei k , λ ( x ( ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ) = l = 0 J l , λ ( k ) ( x ) [ log λ ( 1 + t ) ] j j !
= l = 0 J l , λ ( k ) ( x ) n = l S 1 , λ ( n , m ) t n n !
= n = 0 l = 0 n J l , λ ( k ) ( x ) S 1 , λ ( n , m ) t n n ! .
On the other hand, (see [15])
1 + Ei k , λ ( x ( ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ) = n = 0 b e l n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by comparing the coefficients of t on both sides of equations, we obtain the result. □
Theorem 4. 
Let k Z and n 0 ; we have
J n , λ k ) ( x ) = l = 1 n b e l n , λ ( k ) ( x ) S 2 , λ ( n , l ) .
Proof. 
Replacing t with e λ ( t ) 1 in (37), we obtain
1 + Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = l = 0 b e l n , λ ( k ) ( x ) [ e λ ( t ) 1 ] l l !
= l = 0 b e l n , λ ( k ) ( x ) n = l S 2 , λ ( n , l ) t n n !
= n = 0 l = 1 n b e l n , λ ( k ) ( x ) S 2 , λ ( n , l ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by (29) and (39), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 5 
(Dobinski-like formulas). For n 0 , we have
J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = m = 1 l = 1 m s = 0 m m s ( 1 ) s m ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 m ! S 2 , λ ( m , l ) ( s ) n , λ .
Proof. 
From (29), we note that
n = 1 J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l ( l 1 ) ! l k [ e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ] l
= l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l ( l 1 ) ! l k m = l S 2 , λ ( m , l ) 1 m ! ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) m
= m = 1 l = 1 m ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 m ! S 2 , λ ( m , l ) s = 0 m m s ( 1 ) s m e λ s ( t )
= m = 1 l = 1 m ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 m ! S 2 , λ ( m , l ) s = 0 m m s ( 1 ) s m n = 0 ( s ) n , λ t n n !
= n = 0 m = 1 l = 1 m s = 0 m m s ( 1 ) s m ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 m ! S 2 , λ ( m , l ) ( s ) n , λ t n n !
= m = 1 l = 1 m s = 0 m m s ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 m ! ( 1 ) s m S 2 , λ ( m , l )
+ n = 1 m = 1 l = 1 m s = 0 m m s ( 1 ) s m ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 m ! S 2 , λ ( m , l ) ( s ) n , λ t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients of t on both sides of Equation (41), we obtain the result.
m = 1 l = 1 m s = 0 m m s ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 m ! ( 1 ) s m S 2 , λ ( m , l ) = 0
and
J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = m = 1 l = 1 m s = 0 m m s ( 1 ) s m ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 m ! S 2 , λ ( m , l ) ( s ) n , λ ( n 1 ) .
Theorem 6. 
Let k Z and n 0 ; we have
m = 0 n 1 n m J n m , λ J m + 1 , λ ( k ) ( x ) = j = 1 n i = 0 j n j ( 1 λ ) i , λ S 2 , λ ( j , i ) J n j , λ ( k 1 ) ( x ) .
Proof. 
Differentiating with respect to t in (29), the left hand side of (29) is
t 1 + Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = t 1 + n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ x n ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k
= e λ 1 λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ x n ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) n ( n 1 ) ! n k 1
= e λ 1 λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 Ei k 1 , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) )
= e λ 1 λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 n = 1 J n , λ ( k 1 ) ( x ) t n n ! .
On the other hand, we have
t n = 0 J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = n = 1 J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n 1 ( n 1 ) ! = n = 0 J n + 1 , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .
From (43) and (44), we obtain
( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) n = 0 J n + 1 , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = e λ 1 λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) n = 1 J n , λ ( k 1 ) ( x ) t n n !
n = 0 J n , λ t n n ! m = 0 J m + 1 , λ ( k ) ( x ) t m m !
= i = 0 ( 1 λ ) i , λ [ e λ ( t ) 1 ] i i ! n = 1 J n , λ ( k 1 ) ( x ) t n n !
n = 0 m = 0 n n m J n m , λ J m + 1 , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n !
= j = 0 i = 0 j ( 1 λ ) i , λ S 2 , λ ( j , i ) t j j ! n = 1 J n , λ ( k 1 ) ( x ) t n n !
n = 1 m = 0 n 1 n m J n m , λ J m + 1 , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n !
= n = 1 j = 1 n i = 0 j n j ( 1 λ ) i , λ S 2 , λ ( j , i ) J n j , λ ( k 1 ) ( x ) t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients of t n on both sides, we obtain the result. □
Theorem 7. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = i = 1 n j = 1 i h = 1 j m = 1 h ( 1 ) m , λ m k 1 S 1 , λ ( h , m ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) S 2 , λ ( n , i ) .
Proof. 
From (10) and (22), we observe that
Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = m = 1 ( 1 ) m , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) m ( m 1 ) ! m k
= m = 1 ( 1 ) m , λ m k 1 1 m ! ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) m
= n = 1 m = 1 n ( 1 ) m , λ m k 1 S 1 , λ ( n , m ) t n n ! .
Replacing t by e λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) 1 in (46), we obtain
Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = h = 1 m = 1 h ( 1 ) m , λ m k 1 S 1 , λ ( h , m ) [ e λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ] h h !
= h = 1 m = 1 h ( 1 ) m , λ m k 1 S 1 , λ ( h , m ) j = h S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) j j !
= j = 1 h = 1 j m = 1 h ( 1 ) m , λ m k 1 S 1 , λ ( h , m ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) i = j S 2 , λ ( i , j ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) i i !
= i = 1 j = 1 i h = 1 j m = 1 h ( 1 ) m , λ m k 1 S 1 , λ ( h , m ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) n = i S 2 , λ ( n , i ) t n n !
= n = 1 i = 1 n j = 1 i h = 1 j m = 1 h ( 1 ) m , λ m k 1 S 1 , λ ( h , m ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) S 2 , λ ( n , i ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by Equations (29) and (47), we obtain the result. □
For next theorem, we observe that (see [16])
n = 0 β n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! = Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) e λ ( t ) 1 e λ x ( t )
= m = 0 β m , λ ( k ) t m m ! n = 0 ( x ) n , λ t n n !
= n = 0 m = 0 n n m β m , λ ( k ) ( x ) n m , λ t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients on both sides of (48), we obtain
β n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = m = 0 n n m β m , λ ( k ) ( x ) n m , λ .
Theorem 8. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = i = 1 n j = 1 i h = 1 j β h , λ ( k ) ( 1 ) β h , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) S 2 , λ ( n , i ) .
Proof. 
From (10), (12) and (49), we observe that
Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) j = 0 β j , λ ( k ) t j j !
= m = 0 ( 1 ) m , λ m ! t m 1 j = 0 β j , λ ( k ) t j j !
= n = 0 m = 0 n n m ( 1 ) n m , λ β m , λ ( k ) ( x ) β m , λ ( k ) t n n !
= n = 1 β n , λ ( k ) ( 1 ) β n , λ ( k ) t n n ! .
Replacing t by e λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) 1 in (51), we obtain
Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = h = 1 β h , λ ( k ) ( 1 ) β h , λ ( k ) [ e λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ] h h !
= h = 1 j = h β h , λ ( k ) ( 1 ) β h , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) j j !
= j = 1 h = 1 j β h , λ ( k ) ( 1 ) β h , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) i = j S 2 , λ ( i , j ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) i i !
= i = 1 j = 1 i h = 1 j β h , λ ( k ) ( 1 ) β h , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) n = i S 2 , λ ( n , i ) t n n !
= n = 1 i = 1 n j = 1 i h = 1 j β h , λ ( k ) ( 1 ) β h , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) S 2 , λ ( n , i ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by (29) and (52), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 9. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = i = 1 n j = 1 i h = 1 j m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ β h m , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) S 2 , λ ( n , i ) .
Proof. 
From (10) and (12), we observe that
Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) j = 0 β j , λ ( k ) t j j !
= m = 1 ( 1 ) m , λ m ! t m j = 0 β j , λ ( k ) t j j !
= n = 1 m = 1 n n m ( 1 ) m , λ β n m , λ ( k ) t n n ! .
Replacing t with e λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) 1 in (54), we obtain
Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = h = 1 m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ β h m , λ ( k ) [ e λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ] h h !
= h = 1 j = h m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ β h m , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) j j !
= j = 1 h = 1 j m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ β h m , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) i = j S 2 , λ ( i , j ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) i i !
= i = 1 j = 1 i h = 1 j m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ β h m , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) n = i S 2 , λ ( n , i ) t n n !
= n = 1 i = 1 n j = 1 i h = 1 j m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ β h m , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) S 2 , λ ( n , i ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by (29) and (55), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 10. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
J n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = i = 1 n j = 1 i h = 1 j m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ G h m , λ ( k ) + 2 G h , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) S 2 , λ ( n , i ) .
Proof. 
From (10) and (13), we observe that
2 Ei k , λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = ( e λ ( t ) + 1 ) j = 0 G j , λ ( k ) t j j !
= m = 1 ( 1 ) m , λ m ! t m j = 0 β j , λ ( k ) t j j ! + 2 j = 0 β j , λ ( k ) t j j !
= n = 1 m = 1 n n m ( 1 ) m , λ G n m , λ ( k ) + 2 G n m , λ ( k ) t n n ! .
Replacing t with e λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) 1 in (57), we obtain
Ei k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) ) = h = 1 m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ G h m , λ ( k ) + 2 G h , λ ( k ) [ e λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) ] h h !
= h = 1 j = h m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ G h m , λ ( k ) + 2 G h , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) j j !
= j = 1 h = 1 j m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ β h m , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) i = j S 2 , λ ( i , j ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) i i !
= i = 1 j = 1 i h = 1 j m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ G h m , λ ( k ) + 2 G h , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) n = i S 2 , λ ( n , i ) t n n !
= n = 1 i = 1 n j = 1 i h = 1 j m = 1 h h m ( 1 ) m , λ G h m , λ ( k ) + 2 G h , λ ( k ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( j , h | x ) S 2 , λ ( i , j ) S 2 , λ ( n , i ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by (29) and (58), we obtain the result. □
Motivated and inspired by Equation (24), we define the degenerate poly-Gaenari polynomials given by
1 + Ei k , λ x ( log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) = n = 0 G n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! ( k Z ) ,
and G 0 , λ ( k ) ( x ) = 1 , G n , λ ( k ) = G n , λ ( k ) ( 1 ) are called the poly-Gaenari numbers.
For k = 1 in (59), we note that
1 + Ei 1 , λ x ( log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) = 1 + n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ [ x ( log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ] n ( n 1 ) ! n
= n = 0 G n , λ ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .
Combining with (59) and (60), we have
G n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = G n , λ ( x ) ( n 0 ) .
Theorem 11. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
G n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = l = 1 j j = 1 n ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 S 1 , λ ( j , l ) S 1 , λ ( n , j ) .
Proof. 
From (18) and (60), we observe that
Ei k , λ x ( log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) = l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 1 l ! [ log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) ] l
= l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 j = l S 1 , λ ( j , l ) 1 j ! [ log λ ( 1 + t ) ] j
= l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 j = l S 1 , λ ( j , l ) n = j S 1 , λ ( n , j ) t n n !
= n = 1 l = 1 j j = 1 n ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 S 1 , λ ( j , l ) S 1 , λ ( n , j ) t n n ! .
In view of (59) and (62), we obtain the desired result. □
Theorem 12. 
Let k Z and n 1 Then
G n , λ ( k ) ( x ) = l = 1 n ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , l ) .
Proof. 
From (21) and (59), we observe that
Ei k , λ x ( log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) = l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 1 l ! [ log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) ] l
= l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 n = l S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , l )
= n = 1 l = 1 n ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , l ) t n n ! .
In view of (59) and (64), we obtain the desired result. □
Theorem 13. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
m = 0 n G m , λ ( k ) ( x ) S 2 , λ ( n , m ) = l = 0 n ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 S 1 , λ ( n , l ) .
Proof. 
By replacing t with e λ ( t ) 1 in (59), we obtain
1 + Ei k , λ x ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = m = 0 G m , λ ( k ) ( x ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) m m !
= m = 0 G m , λ ( k ) ( x ) n = m S 2 , λ ( n , m ) t n n !
= n = 0 m = 0 n G m , λ ( k ) ( x ) S 2 , λ ( n , m ) t n n ! .
On the other hand, we have
1 + Ei k , λ x ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = 1 + l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l ( l 1 ) ! l k ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) l
= 1 + l = 1 ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 n = l S 1 , λ ( n , l ) t n n !
= 1 + n = 1 l = 1 n ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 S 1 , λ ( n , l ) t n n !
= n = 0 l = 0 n ( 1 ) l , λ x l l k 1 S 1 , λ ( n , l ) t n n ! .
In view of (66) and (67), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 14. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
m = 0 n G m , λ ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , m ) = ( 1 ) n , λ x n n k 1 .
Proof. 
By replacing t with e λ e λ ( t ) 1 1 in (59), we obtain
1 + Ei k , λ x t ) = m = 0 G m , λ ( k ) ( x ) ( e λ e λ ( t ) 1 1 ) m m !
= m = 0 G m , λ ( k ) ( x ) n = m S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , m ) t n n !
= n = 0 m = 0 n G m , λ ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , m ) t n n ! .
On the other hand, we have
1 + Ei k , λ x t ) = 1 + n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ x n ( n 1 ) ! n k t l
= 1 + n = 1 ( 1 ) n , λ x n n k 1 t n n !
= n = 0 ( 1 ) n , λ x n n k 1 t n n ! .
In view of (69) and (70), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 15. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
m = 0 n J m , λ ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , m ) = ( 1 ) n , λ x n n k 1 .
Proof. 
By replacing t with log λ log λ ( 1 + t ) + 1 in (29) and using (21), we obtain
1 + Ei k , λ x t ) = m = 0 J m , λ ( k ) ( x ) ( log λ log λ ( 1 + t ) + 1 ) m m !
= m = 0 J m , λ ( k ) ( x ) n = m S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , m ) t n n !
= n = 0 m = 0 n J m , λ ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , m ) t n n ! .
In view of (70) and (72), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 16. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
m = 0 n J m , λ ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , m ) = m = 0 n G m , λ ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , m ) .
Proof. 
By using (70) and (72), the complete proof the theorem. □

3. Degenerate Unipoly-Jindalrae and Unipoly-Gaenari Polynomials

In this section, we define the degenerate unipoly-Jindalrae and unipoly-Gaenari polynomials by using of the degenerate unipoly functions attached to polynomials p ( x ) and we give explicit expressions and identities involving those polynomials.
Here, we define the degenerate unipoly-Jindalrae polynomials attached to polynomials p ( x ) by
1 + u k , λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) | p = n = 0 J n , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! .
In the case when x = 1 , J n , λ , p ( k ) = J n , λ , p ( k ) ( 1 ) are called the degenerate unipoly-Jindalrae numbers attached to p.
From (74), we see
n = 0 J n , λ , 1 / Γ ( k ) t n n ! = 1 + u k , λ x ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) | 1 / Γ = r = 1 ( 1 ) r , λ ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) r r k ( r 1 ) !
= 1 + Ei k , λ ( e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ) = n = 0 J n , λ ( k ) t n n ! .
Thus, by (75), we have
J n , λ , 1 / Γ ( k ) = J n , λ ( k ) ( n 0 ) .
Theorem 17. 
For k Z , we have
J n , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) = m = 1 n l = 1 m p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( n , m ) .
Proof. 
From (19) and (74), we note that
u k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) | p ) = l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k [ e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ] l l !
= l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k m = l S 2 , λ ( m , l ) [ e λ ( t ) 1 ] m m !
= m = 1 l = 1 m p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 2 , λ ( m , l ) n = m S 2 , λ ( n , m ) t n n !
= n = 1 m = 1 n l = 1 m p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( n , m ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by Equations (74) and (77), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 18. 
Let k Z and n 0 ; we have
J n , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) = m = 1 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , l ) .
Proof. 
From (22) and (74), we have
u k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) | p ) = l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k [ e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) 1 ] l l !
= l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k n = l S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , l ) t n n !
= n = 1 m = 1 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , l ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by Equations (74) and (79), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 19. 
Let k Z and n 0 ; we have
l = 0 n J l , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S 1 , λ ( n , l ) = l = 0 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 2 , λ ( n , l ) .
Proof. 
Replacing t with log λ ( 1 + t ) in (74), we obtain
1 + u k , λ ( x ( ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ) | p ) = l = 0 J l , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) [ log λ ( 1 + t ) ] j j !
= l = 0 J l , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) n = l S 1 , λ ( n , l ) t n n !
= n = 0 l = 0 n J l , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S 1 , λ ( n , l ) t n n ! .
On the other hand,
1 + u k , λ ( x ( ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ) | p ) = 1 + l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k [ e λ ( t ) 1 ] l l !
= 1 + l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k n = l S 2 , λ ( n , l ) t n n !
= n = 0 l = 0 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 2 , λ ( n , l ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by comparing the coefficients of t on both sides of Equations (81) and (82), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 20. 
Let k Z and n 0 ; we have
J n , λ , p k ) ( x ) = j = n l = 0 j p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 2 , λ ( j , l ) S 2 , λ ( n , j ) .
Proof. 
Replacing t with e λ ( t ) 1 in (74), we obtain
1 + u k , λ ( x ( e λ ( e λ ( 1 ) 1 ) 1 ) | p ) = j = 0 l = 0 j p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 2 , λ ( j , l ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) j j !
= j = 0 l = 0 j p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 2 , λ ( j , l ) n = j S 2 , λ ( n , j ) t n n !
= n = 0 j = n l = 0 j p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 2 , λ ( j , l ) S 2 , λ ( n , j ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by (74) and (84), we obtain the result. □
Now, we define the degenerate unipoly-Gaenari polynomials given by
1 + u k , λ x ( log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) | p = n = 0 G n , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! ( k Z ) .
When x = 1 , G n , λ , p ( k ) = G n , λ , p ( k ) ( 1 ) are called the unipoly-Gaenari numbers attached to p.
Theorem 21. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
G n , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) = l = 1 j j = 1 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 1 , λ ( j , l ) S 1 , λ ( n , j ) .
Proof. 
From (18) and (85), we observe that
u k , λ x ( log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) | p = l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 l ! [ log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) ] l
= l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k j = l S 1 , λ ( j , l ) 1 j ! [ log λ ( 1 + t ) ] j
= l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k j = l S 1 , λ ( j , l ) n = j S 1 , λ ( n , j ) t n n !
= n = 1 l = 1 j j = 1 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 1 , λ ( j , l ) S 1 , λ ( n , j ) t n n ! .
In view of (85) and (87), we obtain the desired result. □
Theorem 22. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
G n , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) = l = 1 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , l ) .
Proof. 
From (21) and (85), we observe that
u k , λ x ( log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) | p = l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k 1 l ! [ log λ ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) + 1 ) ] l
= l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k n = l S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , l )
= n = 1 l = 1 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , l ) t n n ! .
In view of (85) and (89), we obtain the desired result. □
Theorem 23. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
m = 0 n G m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S 2 , λ ( n , m ) = l = 0 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 1 , λ ( n , l ) .
Proof. 
By replacing t with e λ ( t ) 1 in (85), we obtain
1 + u k , λ x ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) | p = m = 0 G m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) m m !
= m = 0 G m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) n = m S 2 , λ ( n , m ) t n n !
= n = 0 m = 0 n G m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S 2 , λ ( n , m ) t n n ! .
On the other hand, we have
1 + u k , λ , p x ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) | p = 1 + l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) l
= 1 + l = 1 p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k n = l S 1 , λ ( n , l ) t n n !
= 1 + n = 1 l = 1 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 1 , λ ( n , l ) t n n !
= n = 0 l = 0 n p ( l ) ( 1 ) l , λ x l l ! l k S 1 , λ ( n , l ) t n n ! .
In view of (91) and (92), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 24. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
m = 0 n G m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , m ) = p ( n ) ( 1 ) n , λ x n n ! n k .
Proof. 
By replacing t with e λ e λ ( t ) 1 1 in (85), we obtain
1 + u k , λ x t | p ) = m = 0 G m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) ( e λ e λ ( t ) 1 1 ) m m !
= m = 0 G m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) n = m S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , m ) t n n !
= n = 0 m = 0 n G m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , m ) t n n ! .
On the other hand, we have
1 + u k , λ x t | p ) = 1 + n = 1 p ( n ) ( 1 ) n , λ x n n ! ! n k t n n !
= 1 + n = 1 p ( n ) ( 1 ) n , λ x n n ! n k t n n !
= n = 0 p ( n ) ( 1 ) n , λ x n n ! n k t n n ! .
In view of (94) and (95), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 25. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
m = 0 n J m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , m ) = p ( n ) ( 1 ) n , λ x n n ! n k .
Proof. 
By replacing t with log λ log λ ( 1 + t ) + 1 in (74) and using (21), we obtain
1 + u k , λ x t | p ) = m = 0 J m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) ( log λ log λ ( 1 + t ) + 1 ) m m !
= m = 0 J m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) n = m S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , m ) t n n !
= n = 0 m = 0 n J m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , m ) t n n ! .
In view of (95) and (97), we obtain the result. □
Theorem 26. 
Let k Z and n 1 . Then
m = 0 n J m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 1 ) ( n , m ) = m = 0 n G m , λ , p ( k ) ( x ) S J , λ ( 2 ) ( n , m ) .
Proof. 
By using (94) and (97), we complete the proof of the theorem. □

4. Conclusions

Inspired by the contributions of Kim et al., as shown in [19], we have introduced the poly-Jindalrae and poly-Gaenari polynomials via an innovative utilization of the polyexponential function. Subsequently, we have meticulously derived explicit identities, encompassing the Jindalrae–Stirling numbers of the first and second categories, the degenerate Stirling numbers of both kinds, and the degenerate Bell polynomials. Moreover, we have extended our investigation to the realm of degenerate unipoly functions associated with the polynomial p ( x ) , resulting in the derivation of unipoly-Jindalrae and unipoly-Gaenari polynomials, replete with explicit expressions.
As we conclude this work, we believe that this paper will have a potential applications of our results in the realms of science, engineering, and other mathematical disciplines in near future such as statistics, probability, differential equations, etc.

Author Contributions

Writing-original draft, N.A., W.A.K., H.N.Z. and A.A.T.; Writing-review and editing, W.A.K. and S.A.; Investigation, S.A.; Supervision, S.A. All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and typed, read, and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Research Deanship at the University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia, through Project No. RG-21 144.

Data Availability Statement

Not availability.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carlitz, L. Degenerate Stirling, Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers. Utilitas Math. 1979, 15, 51–88. [Google Scholar]
  2. Carlitz, L. A degenerate Staudt-Clausen theorem. Arch. Math. 1956, 7, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. A note on a new type of degenerate Bernoulli numbers. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2020, 27, 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kwon, J.; Kim, H.K. A note on degenerate Genocchi and poly-Genocchi numbers and polynomials. J. Ineq. Appl. 2020, 2020, 13. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S. Degenerate polyexponential functions and degenerate Bell polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2020, 487, 124017. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim, H.K.; Jang, L.C. A note on degenerate poly-Genocchi numbers and polynomials. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 392. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaneko, M. Poly-Bernoulli numbers. J. Théor. Nr. Bordx. 1997, 9, 221–228. [Google Scholar]
  8. Khan, W.A.; Muhiuddin, G.; Muhyi, A.; Al-Kadi, D. Analytical properties of type 2 degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials associated with their applications. Adv. Diff. Equt. 2021, 2021, 420. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khan, W.A.; Muhyi, A.; Ali, R.; Alzobydi, K.A.H.; Singh, M.; Agarwal, P. A new family of degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind with its certain related properties. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 12680–12697. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, T. A note on degenerate Stirling polynomials of the second kind. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2017, 20, 319–331. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. A note on polyexponential and unipoly functions. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2019, 26, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dolgy, D.V.; Khan, W.A. A note on type two degenerate poly-Changhee polynomials of the second kind. Symmetry 2021, 13, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hardy, G.H. On a class a functions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1905, 3, 441–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khan, W.A.; Ali, R.; Alzobydi, K.A.H.; Ahmed, N. A new family of degenerate poly-Genocchi polynomials with its certain properties. J. Funct. Spaces 2021, 2021, 6660517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, T.; Kim, H.K. Degenerate poly-Bell polynomials and numbers. Adv. Diff. Equ. 2021, 2021, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kwon, J.K.; Lee, H.S. Degenerate polyexponential functions and type 2 degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials. Adv. Diff. Equ. 2020, 2020, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, W.A.; Acikgoz, M.; Duran, U. Note on the type 2 degenerate multi-poly-Euler polynomials. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Kwon, J. Degenerate Stirling polynomials of the second kind and some applications. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, L.-C.; Lee, H. Jindalrae and Gaenari numbers and polynomials in connection with Jindalrae-Stirling numbers. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alam, N.; Khan, W.A.; Araci, S.; Zaidi, H.N.; Al Taleb, A. Evaluation of the Poly-Jindalrae and Poly-Gaenari Polynomials in Terms of Degenerate Functions. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081587

AMA Style

Alam N, Khan WA, Araci S, Zaidi HN, Al Taleb A. Evaluation of the Poly-Jindalrae and Poly-Gaenari Polynomials in Terms of Degenerate Functions. Symmetry. 2023; 15(8):1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081587

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alam, Noor, Waseem Ahmad Khan, Serkan Araci, Hasan Nihal Zaidi, and Anas Al Taleb. 2023. "Evaluation of the Poly-Jindalrae and Poly-Gaenari Polynomials in Terms of Degenerate Functions" Symmetry 15, no. 8: 1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081587

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop