Next Article in Journal
Oscillation Test for Second-Order Differential Equations with Several Delays
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiplicatively Simpson Type Inequalities via Fractional Integral
Previous Article in Journal
The Symmetry Energy: Current Status of Ab Initio Predictions vs. Empirical Constraints
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Three-Step Numerical Solver for Physical Models under Fractal Behavior
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fractional Multiplicative Bullen-Type Inequalities for Multiplicative Differentiable Functions

1
Laboratory of Analysis and Control of Differential Equations “ACED”, Faculty MISM, Department of Mathematics, University of Guelma, Guelma 24000, Algeria
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Ha’il, Ha’il 55425, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Lahore, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Symmetry 2023, 15(2), 451; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020451
Submission received: 28 December 2022 / Revised: 18 January 2023 / Accepted: 2 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractional-Order Systems and Its Applications in Engineering)

Abstract

:
Various scholars have lately employed a wide range of strategies to resolve specific types of symmetrical fractional differential equations. In this paper, we propose a new fractional identity for multiplicatively differentiable functions; based on this identity, we establish some new fractional multiplicative Bullen-type inequalities for multiplicative differentiable convex functions. Some applications of the obtained results are given.

1. Introduction

Fractional calculus has been one of the main axes of mathematical analysis over the last three decades, both theoretically and in terms of practical applications. Basically, this theory, together with the qualitative theory of fractional differential and fractional integro-differential equations, their numerical simulations, and their symmetry represent a tool of mathematical analysis used to study integrals and derivatives of an arbitrary order, which unifies and generalizes the notions traditional ways of differentiation and integration. Fractional-order nonlinear operators are more convenient than classical formulations. Many scientific disciplines, including fluid mechanics, signal processing, and entropy theory, may involve the qualitative theory of fractional differential equations, fractional integro-differential equations, and fractional order operators. For this reason, the applications of the aforementioned fractional calculus theory and qualitative theory of equations have attracted the attention of scholars around the world.
Integrals play an essential and vital role in certain pure and applied fields combined with convexity, and their generalizations have been the subject of permanent research. As consequence, several papers dealing with convex inequalities in different types of computation have been published (in classical computation, see [1,2,3,4,5,6], for fractional computation [7,8,9,10] and for non-Newtonian calculus [11,12,13,14,15,16]).
Recently, Abdeljawad and Grossman [17] introduced the multiplicative Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals as follows:
Definition 1.
The multiplicative Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals of order α C , Re α > 0 , respectively, are defined by
f I * α ρ u = e J f + α ln   ρ u
and
* I k α ρ u = e J k α ln   ρ u ,
where J l + α and J k α represents the left and the right Riemann–Liouville fractional integral:
J f + α ρ u = 1 Γ α f u u ς α 1 ρ ς d ς , f < u
and
J k α ρ u = 1 Γ α u k ς u α 1 ρ ς d ς , u < k .
Budak and Özçelik [18] used the above operator and established some Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for multiplicatively fractional integrals. Regarding some papers related to the applications concerning the non-Newtonian calculus, one can see [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
The following inequality is known as the Bullen inequality:
l k ρ x d x 1 2 f l + k 2 + f l + f k 2 .
In this paper, we propose the fractional multiplicative analogue of inequality (1). For this, we first prove a new fractional identity for multiplicative differentiable functions. Based on this equality, we provide some fractional Bullen-type inequalities for multiplicatively convex functions. We also give some examples of applications of the obtained results to analytical inequalities.
The non-Newtonian calculus was first presented by Grossman and Katz, where they created and studied the first non-Newtonian calculation system, called geometric calculation. Next, they created an infinite family of non-Newtonian calculi, thus modifying the classical calculus introduced by Newton and Leibniz in the 17th century, each of which differed markedly from the classical calculus of Newton and Leibniz known today as the non-Newtonian calculus or the multiplicative calculus, where the ordinary product and ratio are used, respectively, as the sum and exponential difference over the domain of positive real numbers see [29]. This calculation is useful for dealing with exponentially varying functions.
It is worth noting that the complete mathematical description of multiplicative calculus was given by Bashirov et al. [30]. The reader can also refer to the recent monographs [31,32].
Definition 2.
([30]). Let ρ : R R + be a positive function. The multiplicative derivative ρ * of the function ρ is defined as follows:
d * ρ d t = ρ * ς = lim h 0 ρ ς + h ρ ς 1 h .
Remark 1.
The relation between the multiplicative derivative ρ * and the ordinary derivative ρ is as follows:
ρ * ς = e ln ρ ς = e ρ ς ρ ς .
The multiplicative derivative admits the following properties:
Theorem 1
([30]). Let c be an arbitrary constant, and let ρ and ϑ be two multiplicatively differentiable functions. Then, functions c ρ , ρ ϑ , ρ + ϑ , ρ / ϑ and ρ ϑ are * differentiable, and they satisfy
  • c ρ * ς = ρ * ς ,
  • ρ ϑ * ς = ρ * ς ϑ * ς ,
  • ρ + ϑ * ς = ρ * ς ρ ς ρ ς + ϑ ς ϑ * ς ϑ ς ρ ς + ϑ ς ,
  • ρ ϑ * ς = ρ * ς ϑ * ς ,
  • ρ ϑ * ς = ρ * ς ϑ ς ρ ς ϑ ς .
In [30], Bashirov et al. introduced the concept of the * integral called the multiplicative integral, which is written as k l ρ ς d ς . It is clear that the sum in the classical Riemann integral of ρ over [ l , k ] , is replaced in the multiplicative integral of ρ over [ l , k ] by the product. However, the product is represented by the raising to power.
The relationship between the Riemann integral and the multiplicative integral is as follows:
Proposition 1
([30]). If ρ is a Riemann integrable on [ l , k ] , then ρ is a multiplicative integrable on [ l , k ] and
l k ρ ς d ς = exp l k ln ρ ς d ς .
Some properties of the multiplicative integral are given by the following theorem.
Theorem 2
([30]). Let ρ be a positive and a Riemann integrable on [ l , k ] ; then, ρ is a multiplicative integrable on [ l , k ] and
  • k l ρ ς p d ς = k l ρ ς d ς p ,
  • k l ρ ς ϑ ς d ς = k l ρ ς d ς k l ϑ ς d ς ,
  • k l ρ ς ϑ ς d ς = k l ρ ς d ς k l ϑ ς d ς ,
  • k l ρ ς d ς = c l ρ ς d ς k c ρ ς d ς , l < c < k ,
  • l l ρ ς d ς = 1 and k l ρ ς d ς = l k ρ ς d ς 1 .
Theorem 3
([30], multiplicative integration by parts). Let ρ : [ l , k ] R be multiplicative differentiable, let ϑ : [ l , k ] R be a differentiable so the function ρ ϑ is a multiplicative integrable, and
l k ρ * ς ϑ ς d ς = ρ k ϑ k ρ l ϑ l × 1 k l ρ ς ϑ ς d ς .
Lemma 1.
([33]). Let ρ : [ l , k ] R be multiplicative differentiable, let h : [ l , k ] R , and let ϑ : J R R be two differentiable functions. Then, we have
l k ρ * h ς h ς ϑ ς d ς = ρ h k ϑ k ρ h l ϑ l × 1 k l ρ h ς ϑ ς d ς .
Definition 3.
([33]). A function ρ : I 0 , + is said to be multiplicatively convex or log-convex, if
ρ ς x + 1 ς y ρ x ς ρ ( y ) 1 ς
holds for all x , y I and all ς [ 0 , 1 ] .

2. Main Results

In order to prove our results, we need the following lemma.
Lemma 2.
Let ρ : l , k R + be a multiplicative differentiable mapping on l , k with l < k . If ρ * is a multiplicative integrable on [ l , k ] , then we have the following identity for multiplicative integrals:
ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 l I * α ρ l + k 2 * I l + k 2 α ρ k 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 ς α 1 2 d ς k l 4 × 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k 1 2 1 ς α d ς k l 4 .
Proof. 
Let
I 1 = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 ς α 1 2 d ς k l 4
and
I 2 = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k 1 2 1 ς α d ς k l 4 .
Using the integration by parts for multiplicative integrals, from I 1 we have
I 1 = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 t α 1 2 d t k l 4 = 1 0 ρ * 1 t l + t l + k 2 k l 2 1 2 ς α 1 2 d ς = ρ l + k 2 1 4 ρ l 1 4 . 1 1 0 ρ 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 α 2 ς α 1 d ς = ρ l 1 4 ρ l + k 2 1 4 1 exp 1 0 α 2 ς α 1 ln ρ 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 d ς = ρ l 1 4 ρ l + k 2 1 4 1 exp 2 α 1 α k l α 1 0 u l α 1 ln ρ u d u = ρ l 1 4 ρ l + k 2 1 4 exp 1 Γ α l l + k 2 u l α 1 ln ρ u d u 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α = ρ l 1 4 ρ l + k 2 1 4 l I * α ρ l + k 2 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α .
Similarly, we obtain
I 2 = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k 1 2 1 ς α d ς k l 4 = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k k l 2 1 2 1 2 1 ς α d ς = ρ k 1 4 ρ l + k 2 1 4 . 1 1 0 ρ 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k α 2 1 ς α 1 d ς = ρ l + k 2 1 4 ρ k 1 4 . 1 exp α 2 1 0 1 ς α 1 ln ρ 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k d ς = ρ l + k 2 1 4 ρ k 1 4 . 1 exp 2 α 1 k l α α k l + k 2 k u α 1 ln ρ u d u = ρ l + k 2 n 2 n + 2 ρ k 1 n + 2 . 1 exp 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α 1 Γ α k l + k 2 k u α 1 ln f u d u = ρ l + k 2 1 4 ρ k 1 4 exp 1 Γ α k l + k 2 k u α 1 ln ρ u d u 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α . = ρ l + k 2 1 4 ρ k 1 4 . * I l + k 2 α ρ k 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α .
Multiplying above equalities, we obtain
I 1 × I 2 = ρ l 1 4 ρ l + k 2 1 4 l I * α ρ l + k 2 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α × ρ l + k 2 1 4 ρ k 1 4 . * I l + k 2 α ρ k 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α = ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 l I * α ρ l + k 2 * I l + k 2 α ρ k 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α ,
which is the result. The proof is completed. □
Theorem 4
Let ρ : l , k R + be a multiplicatively differentiable mapping on l , k with l < k . If ln ρ * ln M on [ l , k ] , then we have
ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 l I * α ρ l + k 2 * I l + k 2 α ρ k 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α M k l 4 1 + α α + 1 1 2 1 α 1 .
Proof. 
From Lemma 2, properties of multiplicative integral and using the fact that ln f * ln M , we have
ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 l I * α ρ l + k 2 * I l + k 2 α ρ k 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 ς α 1 2 d ς k l 4 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k 1 2 1 ς α d ς k l 4 = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 k l 4 ς α 1 2 d t 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k k l 4 1 2 1 ς α d ς exp 1 0 k l 4 ς α 1 2 ln ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 d ς × exp 1 0 k l 4 1 2 1 ς α ln ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k d ς = exp k l 4 1 0 ς α 1 2 ln ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 d ς × exp k l 4 1 0 1 2 1 ς α ln ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k d ς exp k l 4 ln M 1 0 ς α 1 2 d ς × exp k l 4 ln M 1 0 1 2 1 ς α d ς = exp k l 4 ln M 1 2 1 α 0 1 2 ς α d ς + 1 1 2 1 α ς α 1 2 d ς × exp k l 4 ln M 1 1 2 1 α 0 1 ς α 1 2 d ς + 1 1 1 2 1 α 1 2 1 ς α d ς = exp k l 4 2 + 2 α 4 α + 1 + 2 α α + 1 1 2 1 α + 1 ln M × exp k l 4 2 + 2 α 4 α + 1 + 2 α α + 1 1 2 1 + 1 α ln M = M k l 4 1 + α α + 1 1 2 1 α 1 .
The proof is completed. □
Corollary 1.
In Theorem 4, if we take α = 1 , then we obtain
ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 k l ρ u d u 1 l k M 3 8 k l .
Theorem 5
Let ρ : l , k R + be a multiplicative differentiable mapping on l , k with l < k . If ρ * is multiplicatively convex function on [ l , k ] , then we have
ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 l I * α ρ l + k 2 * I l + k 2 α ρ k 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α ρ * l f * k k l 2 2 α 2 3 α 8 α + 1 α + 2 + α α + 1 1 2 1 + 1 α α 2 α + 2 1 2 1 + 2 α × f * l + k 2 k l 2 2 α 4 α + 2 + α α + 2 1 2 1 + 2 α .
Proof. 
From Lemma 2, the properties of the multiplicative integral and the multiplicative convexity of ρ * , we have
ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 l I * α ρ l + k 2 * I l + k 2 α ρ k 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 ς α 1 2 d ς k l 4 × 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k 1 2 1 ς α d ς k l 4 = 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 k l 2 1 2 ς α 1 4 d ς × 1 0 ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k k l 2 1 4 1 2 1 ς α d ς exp k l 2 1 0 1 2 ς α 1 4 ln ρ * 1 ς l + ς l + k 2 d ς × exp k l 2 1 0 1 4 1 2 1 ς α ln ρ * 1 ς l + k 2 + ς k d ς exp k l 2 1 0 1 2 ς α 1 4 ln ρ * l 1 ς f * l + k 2 ς d ς × exp k l 2 1 0 1 4 1 2 1 ς α ln ρ * l + k 2 1 ς f * k ς d ς = exp k l 2 1 2 1 α 0 1 4 1 2 ς α ln ρ * l 1 ς f * l + k 2 ς d ς + 1 1 2 1 α 1 2 ς α 1 4 ln ρ * l 1 ς f * l + k 2 ς d ς × exp k l 2 1 1 2 1 α 0 1 2 1 ς α 1 4 ln ρ * l + k 2 1 ς f * k ς d ς + 1 1 1 2 1 α 1 4 1 2 1 ς α ln ρ * l + k 2 1 ς f * k ς d ς = exp k l 2 1 2 1 α 0 1 4 1 2 ς α 1 ς ln ρ * l + ς ln f * l + k 2 d ς + 1 1 2 1 α 1 2 ς α 1 4 1 ς ln ρ * l + ς ln f * l + k 2 d ς × exp k l 2 1 1 2 1 α 0 1 2 1 ς α 1 4 1 ς ln ρ * l + k 2 + ς ln f * k d ς + 1 1 1 2 1 α 1 4 1 2 1 ς α 1 ς ln ρ * l + k 2 + ς ln f * k d ς = exp k l 2 ln ρ * l 1 2 1 α 0 1 4 1 2 ς α 1 ς d ς + ln f * l + k 2 1 2 1 α 0 1 4 1 2 ς α ς d ς + ln ρ * l 1 1 2 1 α 1 2 ς α 1 4 1 ς d ς + ln f * l + k 2 1 1 2 1 α 1 2 ς α 1 4 ς d ς × exp k l 2 ln ρ * l + k 2 1 1 2 1 α 0 1 2 1 ς α 1 4 1 ς d ς + ln f * k 1 1 2 1 α 0 1 2 1 ς α 1 4 ς d ς + ln ρ * l + k 2 1 1 1 2 1 α 1 4 1 2 1 ς α 1 ς d ς + ln f * k 1 1 1 2 1 α 1 4 1 2 1 ς α ς d ς = exp k l 2 α 4 α + 1 1 2 1 α α 8 α + 2 8 1 2 2 α ln ρ * l + α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ln f * l + k 2 + 2 α 2 3 α 8 α + 1 α + 2 + α 4 α + 1 1 2 1 α α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ln ρ * l + 2 α 8 α + 2 + α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ln f * l + k 2 × exp k l 2 2 α 8 α + 2 + α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ln ρ * l + k 2 + 2 α 2 3 α 8 α + 1 α + 2 + α 4 α + 1 1 2 1 α α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ln f * k + α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ln ρ * l + k 2 + α 4 α + 1 1 2 1 α α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ln f * k = exp k l 2 ln ρ * l 2 α 2 3 α 8 α + 1 α + 2 + α α + 1 1 2 1 + 1 α α 2 α + 2 1 2 1 + 2 α + ln f * l + k 2 1 2 2 α 4 α + 2 + α α + 2 1 2 1 + 2 α exp k l 2 ln ρ * l + k 2 1 2 2 α 4 α + 2 + α α + 2 1 2 1 + 2 α + ln f * k 2 α 2 3 α 8 α + 1 α + 2 + α α + 1 1 2 1 + 1 α α 2 α + 2 1 2 1 + 2 α = ρ * l f * k k l 2 2 α 2 3 α 8 α + 1 α + 2 + α α + 1 1 2 1 + 1 α α 2 α + 2 1 2 1 + 2 α f * l + k 2 k l 2 2 α 4 α + 2 + α α + 2 1 2 1 + 2 α ,
where we have used
1 2 1 α 0 1 4 1 2 ς α 1 ς d ς = 1 1 1 2 1 α 1 4 1 2 1 ς α ς d ς = α 4 α + 1 1 2 1 α α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ,
1 2 1 α 0 1 4 1 2 ς α ς d ς = 1 1 2 n + 2 1 α 1 4 1 2 1 ς α 1 ς d ς = α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ,
1 1 2 1 α 1 2 ς α 1 4 1 ς d ς = 1 1 2 1 α 0 1 2 1 ς α 1 4 ς d ς = 2 α 2 3 α 8 α + 1 α + 2 + α 4 α + 1 1 2 1 α α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α ,
1 1 2 1 α 1 2 ς α 1 4 ς d ς = 1 1 2 1 α 0 1 2 1 ς α 1 4 1 ς d ς = 2 α 8 α + 2 + α 8 α + 2 1 2 2 α .
The proof is completed. □
Corollary 2.
In Theorem 5, using the multiplicative convexity of ρ * i.e., f * l + k 2 ρ * l ρ * k , we obtain
ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 l I * α ρ l + k 2 * I l + k 2 α ρ k 2 α 1 Γ α + 1 k l α ρ * l f * k k l 2 1 α 4 α + 1 + α α + 1 1 2 1 + 1 α .
Corollary 3.
In Theorem 5, if we take α = 1 , then we obtain
ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 k l ρ u d u 1 l k ρ * l f * l + k 2 2 f * k k l 32 .
Corollary 4.
In Corollary 3, using the multiplicative convexity of f * , we obtain
ρ l ρ l + k 2 2 ρ k 1 4 k l ρ u d u 1 l k ρ * l f * k k l 16 .

3. Applications to Special Means

We shall consider the means for arbitrary real numbers l , k .
The Arithmetic mean: A l , k = l + k 2 .
The Harmonic mean: H l , k = 2 l k l + k
The logarithmic means: L l , k = k l ln k ln l , l , k > 0 and l k .
The p-Logarithmic mean: L p l , k = k p + 1 l p + 1 p + 1 k l 1 p , l , k > 0 , l k and p R 1 , 0 .
Proposition 2.
Let l , k R with 0 < l < k . Then, we have
e 1 4 2 H 1 l , k A 2 l , k L 1 l , k e 3 k l 8 l 2 .
Proof. 
The assertion follows from Corollary 1 applied to the function ρ ς = e 1 ς whose ρ * ς = e 1 ς 2 , M = e 1 l 2 and k l ρ u d u 1 l k = exp L 1 l , k . □
Proposition 3.
Let l , k R with 0 < l < k . Then, we have
e 1 4 2 A l p , k p + A 2 p l , k L p p l , k e p k l l p 1 + k p 1 16 .
Proof. 
The assertion follows from Corollary 3, applied to the function ρ ς = e ς p with p 2 whose ρ * ς = e p ς p 1 and k l ρ u d u 1 l k = exp L p p l , k . □

4. Conclusions

In this study, we have considered the fractional multiplicative Bullen-type integral inequalities, whose main results can be summarized as follows:
  • A new fractional identity for multiplicatively integrals is proved.
  • Some new fractional multiplicative Bullen-type inequalities for functions whose first multiplicative derivatives are multiplicative convex are established.
  • Some special cases are derived.
  • Applications of our findings are provided.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.B., B.M. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.B., B.M. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, R.S., H.S., T.A. and E.E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by Scientific Research Deanship at University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia through project number RG-21021.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Djenaoui, M.; Meftah, B. Milne type inequalities for differentiable s-convex functions. Honam Math. J. 2022, 44, 325–338. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dragomir, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P. Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 1998, 11, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dragomir, S.S. Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for MN-convex functions. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2021, 18, 123. [Google Scholar]
  4. Meftah, B. Ostrowski’s inequality for functions whose first derivatives are s-preinvex in the second sense. Khayyam J. Math. 2017, 3, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Meftah, B. Fractional Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for functions whose modulus of derivatives are co-ordinated log-preinvex. Punjab Univ. J. Math. (Lahore) 2019, 51, 21–37. [Google Scholar]
  6. Meftah, B.; Merad, M.; Ouanas, N.; Souahi, A. Some new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for functions whose nth derivatives are convex. Acta Comment. Univ. Tartu. Math. 2019, 23, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dahmani, Z. New classes of integral inequalities of fractional order. Matematiche 2014, 69, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dragomir, S.S. Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for generalized Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of h-convex functions. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 2364–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meftah, B.; Benssaad, M.; Kaidouchi, W.; Ghomrani, S. Conformable fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for product of two harmonic s-convex functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2021, 149, 1495–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Set, E.; Butt, S.I.; Akdemir, A.O.; Karaoǧlan, A.; Abdeljawad, T. New integral inequalities for differentiable convex functions via Atangana-Baleanu fractional integral operators. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 143, 110554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ali, M.A.; Abbas, M.; Zhang, Z.; Sial, I.B.; Arif, R. On integral inequalities for product and quotient of two multiplicatively convex functions. Asian Res. J. Math. 2019, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ali, M.A.; Abbas, M.; Zafar, A.A. On some Hermite-Hadamard integral inequalities in multiplicative calculus. J. Inequal. Spec. Funct. 2019, 10, 111–122. [Google Scholar]
  13. Budak, H.; Tunç, T.; Sarikaya, M.Z. Fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for interval-valued functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2020, 148, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Özcan, S. Some integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for multiplicatively preinvex functions. AIMS Math. 2020, 5, 1505–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Özcan, S. Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for multiplicatively h-convex functions. Konuralp J. Math. 2020, 8, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Özcan, S. Hermite–Hadamard-type Inequalities for Multiplicatively h-Preinvex Functions. Turkish J. Anal. Number Theory 2021, 9, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abdeljawad, T.; Grossman, M. On geometric fractional calculus. J. Semigroup Theory Appl. 2016, 2016, 2. [Google Scholar]
  18. Budak, H.; Özçelik, K. On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for multiplicative fractional integrals. Miskolc Math. Notes 2020, 21, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boruah, K.; Hazarika, B. Application of geometric calculus in numerical analysis and difference sequence spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2017, 449, 1265–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Çakır, Z. Spaces of continuous and bounded functions over the field of geometric complex numbers. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Çakmak, A.; Başar, F. On the classical sequence spaces and non-Newtonian calculus. J. Inequal. Appl 2012, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  22. Çakmak, A.F.; Başar, F. Certain spaces of functions over the field of non-Newtonian complex numbers. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 236124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Çakmak, A.F.; Başar, F. On line and double integrals in the non-Newtonian sense. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings; American Institute of Physics: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Volume 1611, pp. 415–423. [Google Scholar]
  24. Çakmak, A.F.; Başar, F. Some sequence spaces and matrix transformations in multiplicative sense. TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math. 2015, 6, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tekin, S.; Başar, F. Certain sequence spaces over the non-Newtonian complex field. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, 2013, 739319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Türkmen, C.; Başar, F. Some basic results on the sets of sequences with geometric calculus. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics, Ft. Worth, TX, USA, 5–10 August 2012; Volume 1470, pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  27. Uzer, A. Multiplicative type complex calculus as an alternative to the classical calculus. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 60, 2725–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Uzer, A. Exact solution of conducting half plane problems in terms of a rapidly convergent series and an application of the multiplicative calculus. Turk J. Elec. Eng. Comp. Sci. 2015, 23, 1294–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grossman, M.; Katz, R. Non-Newtonian Calculus; Lee Press: Rockport, MA, USA, 1972; p. viii+94. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bashirov, A.E.; Kurpı nar, E.M.s.r.; Özyapıcı, A. Multiplicative calculus and its applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 337, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Başar, F. Summability Theory and Its Applications, 2nd ed.; CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mursaleen, M.; Başar, F. Sequence Spaces: Topics in Modern Summability Theory; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Sarikaya, M.Z.; Zhang, Z. Ostrowski and Simpson type inequalities for multiplicative integrals. Proyecciones 2021, 40, 743–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boulares, H.; Meftah, B.; Moumen, A.; Shafqat, R.; Saber, H.; Alraqad, T.; Ali, E.E. Fractional Multiplicative Bullen-Type Inequalities for Multiplicative Differentiable Functions. Symmetry 2023, 15, 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020451

AMA Style

Boulares H, Meftah B, Moumen A, Shafqat R, Saber H, Alraqad T, Ali EE. Fractional Multiplicative Bullen-Type Inequalities for Multiplicative Differentiable Functions. Symmetry. 2023; 15(2):451. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020451

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boulares, Hamid, Badreddine Meftah, Abdelkader Moumen, Ramsha Shafqat, Hicham Saber, Tariq Alraqad, and Ekram E. Ali. 2023. "Fractional Multiplicative Bullen-Type Inequalities for Multiplicative Differentiable Functions" Symmetry 15, no. 2: 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020451

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop