Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Fuel Injection Parameters of Moringa oleifera Biodiesel-Diesel Blend for Engine-Out-Responses Improvements
Next Article in Special Issue
Stone Duality for Kolmogorov Locally Small Spaces
Previous Article in Journal
A Parametric Generalization of the Baskakov-Schurer-Szász-Stancu Approximation Operators
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Homeomorphic Arrangements of Smooth Manifolds

Department of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2021, 13(6), 981; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13060981
Submission received: 20 April 2021 / Revised: 18 May 2021 / Accepted: 21 May 2021 / Published: 1 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advance in Pure and Applied Mathematics)

Abstract

:
Symmetry between mathematical constructions is a very desired phenomena in mathematics in general, and in algebraic geometry in particular. For line arrangements, symmetry between topological characterizations and the combinatorics of the arrangement has often been studied, and the first counterexample where symmetry breaks is in dimension 13. In the first part of this paper, we shall prove that two arrangements of smooth compact manifolds of any dimension that are connected through smooth functions are homeomorphic. In the second part, we prove this in the affine case in dimension 4.

1. Introduction

An arrangement is a finite collection of affine subspaces (of possibly varying dimensions) in R l or C l , or a collection of linear subspaces of a projective space CP l 1 or RP l 1 . The topology of the complement of the union of the planes is of considerable interest. In 1989, Randell [1] proved a deep theorem, which shows that two arrangements have the same topology if they can be transferred from one to the other using a smooth one parameter family of arrangements. This resulted in the invention of a new invariant–the moduli space. Randell’s study was very fruitful and resulted in many important theorems concerning symmetry rope. For instance, in [2] it was implemented for lines which in this case are a linear subspace of C 2 , for example, the solution in C 2 to the equation y = ( 5 + i ) x + 2 + 4 i . In [3,4], it was proven that the combinatorial structure determines the fundamental group of the complement for a six line arrangement. Using Van Kampen theorems [5] and the Moishezon-Teicher algorithm [6], it was extended to seven and eight lines [7,8]. Later, it was generalized to nine lines in [9], ten lines in [10] and eleven lines in [11].
In this paper, we are going to improve Randell’s theorem and we move to diffeomorphisms of smooth manifolds in general, a contemporary topic (see, e.g., [12,13]). Whereas Randell talks about changing hyperplane arrangements through smooth families of hyperplanes, we are going to show that we can also transfer from one arrangement of smooth manifolds to another using smooth families of hyperplane arrangements. As a consequence, we show that we can transform arrangements of lines to other arrangements of lines through symmetry of arrangements to polynomials, families of polynomials of any degree. Since lines in the complex planes are homeomorphic to two dimensional sets in R 4 , our theorems will use that idea for another improvement of the theorem.

2. Definitions and Notations

The following theorems and definitions are well known.
Theorem 1 
(Topological invariance of dimension [14]). A non-empty n-dimensional topological manifold cannot be homeomorphic to an m-dimensional manifold unless m = n .
Definition 1 
([14]). For any smooth manifold M, we define an open submanifold of M to be any open subset with the subspace topology and with the smooth charts obtained by restricting those of M .
Theorem 2 
(Open sub-manifold [14]). Suppose M is a smooth manifold. The embedded submanifolds of codimension 0 in M are exactly the open submanifolds.
Proposition 1 
([14]). Suppose M and N are smooth manifolds with or without boundary, and F : M N is an injective smooth immersion. If any of the following holds, then F is a smooth embedding:
(a) 
F is an open or closed map;
(b) 
F is a proper map;
(c) 
M is compact;
(d) 
M has empty boundary and dim M = dim N .
Theorem 3 
(Proper continuous maps are closed [14]). Suppose X is a topological space and Y is a locally compact Hausdorff space. Then every proper continuous map F : X Y is closed.
Definition 2. 
A stratification of a manifold is a partitioning of the manifold into a finite collection of submanifolds { U } (called the strata) so that the following frontier condition is satisfied: Whenever U and V are strata with V c l ( U ) , then V c l ( U ) .
Definition 3 
([14]). A stratification is called a Whitney stratification if it satisfies Whitney’s condition (b): For all strata U, V, with V c l ( U ) , and for all x V , whenever x i and y j are sequences in V and U, respectively, with x i y i so that x i converges to x and y i converges to x, so that the secants x i y i ¯ converge to l RP n 1 and so that T y i U converges to τ in the Grassmannian of dimension U planes in R n , then l τ .
Theorem 4 
([1]). Any stratification in which the closure of every stratum is a smooth submanifold is a Whitney stratification.
Theorem 5 
(Thom’s first isotopy theorem [15]). Let f : M R be a proper, smooth map which is a submersion on each stratum of a Whitney stratification of M. Then there is a stratum-preserving homeomorphism h : M R × ( f 1 ( 0 ) M ) which is smooth on each stratum and commutes with the projection to R . In particular, the fibers of f are homeomorphic by a stratum-preserving homeomorphism.

Stereographic Projection

The following definitions and claims are well known: the function
φ n : S n ( 0 , 0 , , 1 ) R n
defined by
φ n ( x 1 , , x n + 1 ) = x 1 1 x n + 1 , , x n 1 x n + 1
is a homeomorphism and so is from
ψ n : i S n ( 0 , 0 , , 1 )
to R n defined by
ψ n ( x 1 , , x n + 1 ) = x 1 1 + x n + 1 , , x n 1 + x n + 1 .
The inverse functions are:
φ n 1 ( y 1 , , y n ) = 2 y 1 i = 1 n y i 2 + 1 , , 2 y n i = 1 n y i 2 + 1 , 1 2 i = 1 n y i 2 + 1
ψ n 1 ( y 1 , , y n ) = 2 y 1 i = 1 n y i 2 + 1 , , 2 y n i = 1 n y i 2 + 1 , 1 + 2 i = 1 n y i 2 + 1 .
The composition defined from R n minus the origin to itself is:
ψ n φ n 1 ( y 1 , , y n ) = φ ψ 1 ( y 1 , , y n ) = y 1 i = 1 n y i 2 , , y n i = 1 n y i 2 .
In this paper we denote p : = ( 0 , 0 , 1 ) , φ : = φ 2 , ψ : = ψ 2 .

3. Topological and Geometric Aspects of Manifolds

With the previous theorems in mind we prove the following.
Lemma 1. 
Let A , B and C 1 , , C n be manifolds such that B is a closed submanifold of A and C 1 , , C n are closed submanifolds of B. Assume that for all 1 i n , dim ( C i ) < dim ( B ) . Then i = 1 n C i is nowhere dense in the subspace topology of B and in addition C l ( B i = 1 n C i ) = B .
Proof. 
First we prove that for any 1 i n , C i is nowhere dense. Indeed, since C i is closed it is sufficient to show that it has an empty interior. Assume to the contrary that S is an open set of B contained in C i , then from the definition of subspace topology it is an open set also in C i by Theorem 2. We get that S is a manifold of dimension equal to the dimension of B and also a manifold with a dimension equal to C i . The contradiction to Theorem 1 proves the statement. Since a finite union is nowhere dense so is i = 1 n C i and since 1 i n   C i is closed then C l ( B i = 1 n C i ) = B . □
Proposition 2. 
Let A , B , C , D be Hausdorff spaces where A is compact. Let f : A × B C be a continuous function and g : B D be continuous and proper. Let h : A × B C × D be defined by sending ( x , y ) to ( f ( x , y ) , g ( y ) ) then h is continuous and proper.
Proof. 
Let p be the projection of C × D to D and let S be some set. Then, an element ( a , b ) is in h 1 ( S ) if there exist ( c , d ) C × D such that h ( ( a , b ) ) = ( c , d ) . By definition, h ( ( a , b ) = ( f ( a , b ) , g ( b ) ) and h ( ( a , b ) ) = ( c , d ) if and only if ( f ( a , b ) , g ( b ) ) = ( c , d ) ) . This implies that f ( a , b ) = c and g ( b ) = d so h 1 ( S ) = f 1 ( S ) g 1 ( p ( S ) . First we prove that h is indeed continuous. Let S 1 be an open set since p is an open function and f , g are continuous. Then f 1 ( S ) g 1 ( p ( S ) is an intersection of the two open sets and, therefore, open. Next we will prove that h is proper: let S be a compact set. In particular it is closed so h 1 ( S ) is closed. On the other hand, h 1 ( S ) = f 1 ( S ) g 1 ( p ( S ) A × g 1 p ( S ) since p is continuous, P ( S ) is compact and since h is proper g 1 p ( S ) is also compact. Since A and g 1 p ( S ) are compact so is A × g 1 p ( S ) . To conclude, we get that h 1 ( S ) is closed and a subset of compact subset and, therefore, compact. □
Proposition 3. 
Let Q and M be smooth manifolds and f : Q × R M a smooth function. For any t R , let f t : Q M be the function sending q to f ( q , t ) . Let F : Q × R M × R be the function that sends ( g , t ) to ( f ( g , t ) , t ) . Then
1. 
if any t R f t is injective then F is injective;
2. 
if f is smooth then F is smooth;
3. 
if f is smooth and for any t R   f t is an immersion then F is an immersion;
4. 
if f is smooth and dim ( Q ) = 0 then F is an immersion;
5. 
if Q is compact, f is smooth, for any t R f t is injective and if dim ( Q ) > 0 it is also an immersion then F is an embedding with a closed image;
6. 
if F is an embedding and π is the projection of M × R to the second factor then π | I m ( F ) is a submersion.
Proof. 
  • Let ( q 1 , t 1 ) , ( q 2 , t 2 ) Q × R such that F ( ( q 1 , t 1 ) = F ( q 2 , t 2 ) . Then by the definition of F we get that ( f ( q 1 , t 1 ) , t 1 ) = ( f ( q 2 , t 2 ) , t 2 ) . Therefore, t 1 = t 2 and we denote it as t, so we get that f ( q 1 , t ) = f ( q 2 , t ) . By the definition of f t this implies that f t ( q 1 ) = f t ( q 2 ) and since f t is injective, then q 1 = q 2 .
  • Since f is a smooth function from Q × R to M, there exist for every p Q × R smooth charts ( U , φ ) containing p and ( V , ψ ) containing f ( p ) such that f ( U ) V and ψ f φ 1 is a smooth function from U to V. Since the domain is Q × R then ( U , φ ) = ( U 1 × R , φ 1 × I d R ) . Since ( V , ψ ) is a chart of M then ( V × R , ψ × I d R ) is a chart for M × R . If we take the point q U it is equal to ( q 1 , t ) where q 1 U 1 and t R . We look at the charts ( U 1 × R , φ × I d R ) and ( V × I d R , ψ × I d R ) . Then
    ( ψ × I d R ) F ( φ × I d R ) 1 ( q 1 , t ) = ( ψ × I d R ) ( f × i d R ) ( φ 1 ( q 1 ) , t )
    which is equal to
    ( ψ × I d R ) ( f φ 1 ( q 1 , t ) , t ) = ( ψ f φ 1 ( q 1 , t ) , t ) .
    Let us assume that M is of order k. Then ψ f φ 1 have k component functions f 1 , , f k which are all smooth. So we can write F as k + 1 components f 1 , , f k , p where p is the projection from Q × R to R . We can see that all the components are smooth and, therefore, F is smooth.
  • Let p be a point as in the previous paragraph and that ψ × I d R F φ 1 has k + 1 components f 1 , , f k , t . Since φ = φ 1 × I d R then the coordinates of the domain of ψ × I d R F φ 1 are x 1 , , x m , t when we assume that the order of Q is m. Let 1 i k and 1 j m , then the partial derivative of f i in the coordinate x j is equal to
    lim h 0 f i ( x 1 , , x j 1 , x j + h , x j + 1 , , x k , t ) f i ( x 1 , x k , t ) ) h
    which is equal to
    lim h 0 f i t ( x 1 , , x j 1 , x j + h , x j + 1 , , x k ) f i t ( ( x 1 , x k , t ) ) h ,
    where f i t is the i-th component of ψ f t φ 1 1 . We can see that the partial derivative of f i in the coordinate x j is equal to the partial derivative of f i t in the coordinate x j . The x j partial derivative of t is 0 and the t-th derivative of t is 1. To conclude, the Jacobian of F in the point p is
    Symmetry 13 00981 i001
    where A is the Jacobian of f t . Since f t is an immersion so is F.
  • Since dim ( Q ) = 0 , it is a union of points with the discrete topology and every point has a homeomorphism to R 0 which is precisely one point by a function that sends one point to the other. So if we take one point a × R and the homeomorphism to R as the natural one, then we have that one function f ( t ) = z where z is the variable of R in M × R which is obviously an immersion.
  • By paragraphs (1)–(4) F is injective immersion. Since the identity is obviously proper, then by Lemma 3 F is proper. So by Proposition 1 it is a smooth embedding. By Theorem 3 it is closed; in particular, it has a closed image.
  • It is sufficient to prove that F π is a submersion but F π is a projection of the second factor of Q × R which is known to be a submersion.
 □

4. Main Theorem

In order to prove the main Theorem 4, we need the following lemma.
Lemma 2.
Let M , S be smooth manifolds. H is a finite set of closed smooth submanifolds of M. s : M S is a submersion such that:
1. 
for every h H , dim ( h ) < dim ( M ) ;
2. 
for every h 1 , h 2 H such that h 1 h 2 , dim ( h 1 ) < dim ( h 2 ) ;
3. 
for every h 1 , h 2 H , there exist H 1 H such that h 1 h 2 = H 1 . For all h H , s | h is a submersion.
Let us denote
1. 
for h H   h ¯ = { h h 1 H h 1 h h 1 h H } ;
2. 
H ¯ : = h H { h ¯ } ;
3. 
M ¯ = M ( H ¯ ) ;
4. 
W : = H ¯ { M ¯ } .
Then H ¯ M H ¯ is Whitney’s stratification, and for all w W , s | w is a submersion.
Proof. 
Since every element in H ¯ is a submanifold minus a finite union of closed sets, it is an open submanifold of h and by Theorem 2 every h ¯ H ¯ is a submanifold. It is also closed in M and, therefore, M ¯ is also an open submanifold. It is obvious that W = M . Next we will prove that every two different sets in W are disjoint. It is sufficient to show for elements in H ¯ . Let h 1 ¯ , h 2 ¯ H ¯ where h 1 ¯ h 2 ¯ . Assume to the contrary that x h 1 ¯ h 2 ¯ . From the definition of H ¯ there exist h 1 , h 2 H such that h 1 ¯ = h 1 h H h h 1 h and h 2 ¯ = h 2 h H h h 2 h . We can see that x h 1 and x h 2 and, therefore, x h 1 h 2 . By our assumption there exist H 1 H such that h 1 h 2 = H 1 . Therefore, x H 1 which implies that there exist h 3 H 1 such that x h 3 and h 3 h 1 h 2 . If h 1 were equal to h 2 then w 1 would be equal to w 2 . Therefore, there exist h i ( i = 1 , 2 ) such that h 1 h 2 h i , hence h 3 h i and, therefore, x w i . This contradiction proves our statement.
Until now we proved that W ¯ is a partitioning of the manifold M into a finite collection of submanifolds. Let w W . Then it is equal to h 1 h H h h 1 h since by our assumption every h that is strictly contained in h 1 has a smaller dimension by Lemma 1 C l ( w ) = h 1 . Similarly, since for every h H dim ( h ) < dim ( M ) and M ¯ = M H . Then by Lemma 1 C l ( M ¯ ) = M . Assume now that we have two elements w 1 , w 2 such that C l ( w 1 ) w 2 . Then, by our last statement, C l ( w 1 ) = h 1 for some h 1 H and w 2 = h 2 h H h h 2 h for h 2 H . If h 1 h 2 h 2 , h 1 h 2 h 2 , and, therefore, h 1 h 2 w 2 = . Since w 2 h 2 we get that h 2 w 2 = w 2 and, therefore, h 1 w 2 = . This contradiction forces us to say that h 1 h 2 = h 2 which implies that h 2 h 1 and, therefore, w 2 h 1 . Since C l ( M ¯ ) = M , it is obvious that every element in W is a subset of c l ( M ¯ ) . To conclude, we get that W ¯ is a stratification. Since for every w W ¯ there is h H such that C l ( w ) = h and every h H is a smooth submanifold and the closure of M ¯ = M , which is also a smooth manifold, by Theorem 4 W ¯ is also a Whitney stratification. Since submersion is a local property and s | h and are submersions, this is also true for their open subspaces, namely the elements in W ¯ . □
Proposition 4.
Let M be a compact smooth manifold, J a finite set. For every j J , Q j is a compact smooth manifold and g j : Q j × R M is a smooth function. For every j J and t R , let g j t : Q j M be the function that sends q to g j ( q , t ) . f : J × J P ( J ) is a function such that:
1. 
for any ( i , j ) J × J and for all t R I m ( g i t ) I m ( g j t ) = k f ( ( i , j ) ) I m ( g k t ) ;
2. 
for all j J and t R g j t is injective;
3. 
for all j J and t R if dim ( Q j ) > 0 g t j is an immersion;
4. 
for all j J dim ( Q j ) < dim ( M ) ;
5. 
for all j , k J if there exist t R such that I m ( g t k ) I m ( g j t ) then dim ( Q k ) < dim ( Q j ) .
Then M j J I m ( g j 0 ) is homeomorphic to M j J I m ( g j 1 ) .
Proof. 
We define for any j J , G j : Q j × R M × R by G j ( x , t ) : = ( g j t ( x ) , t ) . Since g j is smooth, Q j is compact. For all t R , g j t is injective and if dim ( Q j ) > 0 then it is also an immersion. Then, by Proposition 3 G j is an embedding with a closed image, and for π equal to the projection of M × R to the second factor π | I m ( G j ) is a submersion.
Now we are going to show that for any ( i , j ) J × J ,
I m ( G i ) I m ( G j ) = k f ( ( i , j ) ) I m ( G k )
Indeed, ( x , t ) I m ( G i ) if and only if x g t t . Therefore, ( x , t ) I m ( G i ) I m ( G j ) if and only if x I m ( g i t ) I m ( g j t ) which by (1) this happens if and only if x i f ( k ) I m ( G i t ) and happens if and only if ( x , t ) k f ( ( i , j ) ) I m ( G k ) . Let i , j J . If I m ( G i ) I m ( G j ) . We would like to show that dim ( I m ( G i ) ) < dim ( I m ( G i ) ) . We know that ( x , t ) is in I m ( G i ) if and only if x g j t and the same is true for j. So if ( x , t ) I m ( G j ) I m ( G i ) , then x I m ( g i t ) I m ( g j t ) and for this specific t if x g i t then ( x , t ) I m ( G i ) which implies that ( x , t ) I m ( G i ) and, therefore, x g t t . Combining these two facts, we get that I m ( g i t ) I m ( g j t ) which implies by our condition that dim ( Q j ) < dim ( Q l ) which imply that dim ( Q j × R ) < dim ( Q l × R ) which means that dim ( I m ( G j ) ) < dim ( I m ( G l ) ) , as needed. Let H : = I m ( G j ) j J . Then H is a finite subset of closed smooth manifolds. For all h 1 , h 2 , there exist H 1 such that h 1 h 2 = H , for all h 1 , h 2 H such that h 1 h 2 dim ( h 1 ) < dim ( h 2 ) and for all h H dim ( h ) < dim ( N ) .
We denote W = { h h 1 H h 1 h h H } , N : = ( M × R ) H and W ¯ : = W { N } . Then by Lemma 2 W ¯ is a Whitney stratification and for all w W ¯ , π | w is a submersion, and since M is compact. π is proper on M × R . Therefore, by Theorem 5, there is a homeomorphism from π 1 ( 0 ) to π 1 ( 1 ) which is a stratum-preserving homeomorphism, so we can see that π 1 ( 0 ) = M . If h H ¯ then there exist k P ( I ) such that h = H ( k ) π 1 ( 1 ) h = i k h 1 i h 1 l where l is some element in k . In particular, for i I , if h = H ( { i } ) , π 1 ( 0 ) h = h 1 i ) , so π 1 ( 0 ) H ¯ = i I h 1 i which means that π 1 ( 1 ) N ¯ = M i I h 1 i . In the same way, π 1 ( 0 ) N ¯ = M i I h 0 i and, therefore, they are homeomorphic. □

5. Adaptation of the Main Theorem to Curves

This section is a corollary of the main theorem in the case of curves. We are going to use the following definition for simplification.
Definition 4.
Let F : X × R Y be a function. We define for every t R , F t : X Y by F t ( x ) = F ( x , t ) . Then we say that F satisfies condition 1 if it satisfies the following conditions:
1. 
F is smooth;
2. 
for every t R , F t is injective;
3. 
if dim ( X ) > 0 then for every t R , F t is injective.
Theorem 6.
Let F : S 2 × R S 2 × S 2 be a function such that F on S 2 p is ( φ × I d ) g ( φ 1 × φ ) 1 where g ( x , y , t ) = ( ( x , y ) , ( H 1 , H 2 + ( x 2 + y 2 ) k ) , such that H 1 , H 2 are polynomials of the variables x , y over the smooth function with one variable, k = m a x { d e g ( H 1 ) , d e g ( H 2 ) ) } and ( p , t ) sends to p × p . Then F satisfies condition 1.
Proof. 
Let
H 1 : = i , j h i j 1 x i y j ,
H 2 : = i , j h i j 2 x i y j
such that for all i , j and k = 1 , 2 , h i j k is a smooth function. First, we prove that F is a smooth function. Let a S 2 p , then we choose for the domain the chart φ 1 × I d and for the image φ × φ , so we need to prove that
( φ × I d ) 1 F ( φ × φ )
is smooth. Indeed we get that
( φ × I d ) 1 F ( φ × φ ) = ( φ × I d ) 1 ( φ × I d ) g ( φ × φ ) 1 ( φ × φ ) = g .
It is easy to see that “g” is smooth. For the points ( p , t ) , we take the domain chart to be ψ 2 × I d and the image chart to be ψ 2 × ψ 2 . So we need to prove that ( ψ 2 × I d ) 1 F ( ψ 2 × ψ 2 ) is smooth. Indeed for a point ( a , t ) where a p
( ψ 2 × I d ) 1 F ( ψ 2 × ψ 2 ) = ( ψ 2 × I d ) 1 ( φ × I d ) g ( φ 1 × φ ) 1 ( ψ 2 × ψ 2 )
= ( ( ψ 2 ) 1 ( φ ) × I d ) g ( φ 1 ψ 2 × ( φ 1 ψ 2 ) ) .
Thus, ψ 2 is injective and ψ 2 ( p 1 ) = ( 0 , 0 ) . So if ( x , t ) R 2 ( 0 , 0 ) × R and we denote z : = x 2 + y 2 , we get that ( ( ψ 1 ) 1 ( φ 1 ) × I d ) ( x , y , t ) = ( x z , y z , t ) . If we apply g on the result we get:
x z , y z , i , j h i j 1 ( t ) x i y j z i + j , i , j h i j 2 ( x ) i ( y ) j z i + j + ( x ) 2 z 2 + ( y ) 2 z 2 k .
Now x z 2 + y z 2 = x 2 + y 2 z 2 = z z 2 = 1 z , so we get
x z , y z , i , j h i j 1 ( t ) ( x ) i ( y ) j z i + j , i , j h i j 2 ( x ) i ( y ) j z i + j + 1 z k .
This is equal to
x z , y z , i , j h i j 1 ( t ) ( x ) i ( y ) j z k i j z k , i , j h i j 2 x i y j z k i j z k + 1 z k .
If we denote A : = i , j h i j 1 x i y j z k i j and B : = i , j h i j 2 x i y j z k i j , we note that since k is always larger than i + j in every summand, then when ( x , y ) approaches ( 0 , 0 ) then A and B approach 0 . So we get ( x z , y z ) , ( A z k , B + 1 z k ) . If we apply ( φ 1 ψ 2 ) × ( φ 1 ψ 2 ) , we get
x z ( x z ) 2 + ( y z ) 2 , y z ( x z ) 2 + ( y z ) 2 , A z k ( A z k ) 2 + ( B + 1 z k ) 2 , B + 1 z k ( A z k ) 2 + ( B + 1 z k ) 2 .
This is equal to ( x , y ) , A z k A 2 + ( B + 1 ) 2 , ( B + 1 ) z k A 2 + ( B + 1 ) 2 .
We can see that when x , y converges to ( 0 , 0 ) the expression converges to ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 0 ) . If we apply ( ψ 2 × I d ) 1 F ( ψ 2 × ψ 2 ) on ( 0 , 0 , t ) , we get ( ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 0 ) because applying ( ψ 2 × I d ) 1 will give us ( p , t ) Then, applying F will give us p × p and, finally, applying ψ 2 × ψ 2 will give us ( ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 0 ) ) . So the function is continuous and a smooth function divided by a smooth function other than 0 in a small neighborhood is smooth. Let t R . We will show that F t is injective and is an immersion for all t R . First we show it is injective for an element in S 2 p . Let R : = S 2 p × t then F = ( φ × I d ) | R g ( φ × φ ) . Since ( φ 1 × I d ) | R , g , φ × φ are injective, F t is injective on S 2 p . Since the p × p is not in the image of φ × φ then S 1 p 1 is not going to p × p since p 1 is going to p × p , then F t is injective. Now we will show that the function is an immersion. For a point a S 2 p , we choose for the domain the chart α sending X to ( φ ( X ) , t ) and for the image φ × φ we get α F φ × φ = α ( φ × I d ) g ( φ × φ ) 1 ( φ × φ ) . This function sends ( x , y ) to ( ( x , y ) , ( , ) ) . If we look at the minor of the Jacobian, we get
a 11 a 12 a 11 a 12 = 1 0 0 1
so these points have rank 2. For the point “p” we choose for the domain the chart β sending X to ( ψ ( X ) , t ) . For the image ( ψ × ψ ) for similar reasons as before, the image is ( ( x , y ) , ( , ) ) which is also of rank 2. Therefore, on these points the function has rank 2, hence it is an immersion. □
The next theorem is an adaptation to lines in C 2 which are topologically equivalent to sets in R 4 .
Theorem 7.
Let g i : R P ( R 4 ) ( i = 1 n ) be functions defined by t { ( x , y , H 1 , H 2 ) x , y R } such that H 1 , H 2 are polynomials of the variables x , y over the smooth function with one variable. Let κ i : R R 4 (for i = 1 … m) be a smooth function and let f : [ 1 n ] × [ 1 n ] [ 1 m ] be a function such that the following conditions hold:
1. 
for all t R and 1 i , j n , g i ( t ) g j ( t ) = κ f ( i , j ) ( t ) ;
2. 
for all i j and t R κ i ( t ) κ j ( t ) = ;
3. 
if there exist t R and i , r such that κ i ( t ) g r ( t ) then there exists j such that f ( i , j ) = r .
Then
R 4 i = 1 n I m ( g i ( 0 ) ) i = 1 m I m ( κ i ( 0 ) )
is homeomorphic to
R 4 i = 1 n I m ( g i ( 1 ) ) i = 1 m I m ( κ i ( 0 ) ) .
Proof. 
Let ϕ : R 4 R 4 be the homeomorphism sending ( x , y , z , w ) to ( x , y , z , w + ( x 2 + y 2 ) k ) where k = m a x ( d e g ( H 1 ) , d e g ( H 2 ) ) . Let J 1 : = { a i 1 i n } , J 2 : = { b 1 , b 2 } , J 3 : = { c , d i 1 i m } and J : = i = 1 3 J i . To a i we attach the manifold S 2 and the function G i : S 2 × R S 2 × S 2 which we defined piecewise on S 2 p . It will be defined as ( φ × I d ) ( φ × I d ) g i ϕ ( φ × φ ) 1 and p × R will be sent to p × p . By Theorem 6 they satisfy condition (1). For b i we attach the manifold S 2 and the functions β i : S 2 × R S 2 × S 2 are defined as follows: β 1 ( a , t ) = ( a , p ) and β 2 ( a , t ) = ( p , a ) . It is easy to see that these functions satisfy condition (1). For c and d i we attach a manifold with a single point which we denote by P t . We define the following function: for c we define the constant function P which sends every element to p × p and for d i we define the function D i : R S 2 × S 2 which is defined as κ i φ 1 × φ 1 . Next we define f ˜ : J × J P ( J ) as follows:
  • f ˜ ( a i , a j ) = { c , f ( a i , a j ) } ;
  • f ˜ ( a i , b j ) = c ;
  • f ˜ ( a i , c ) = c ;
  • f ˜ ( a i , d r ) = d r j s . t . f ( i , j ) = r o t h e r w i s e
  • f ˜ ( b 1 , b 2 ) = c ;
  • f ˜ ( b i , c ) = c ;
  • f ˜ ( b i , d j ) = ;
  • f ˜ ( c , d i ) = ;
  • f ˜ ( d i , d j ) = .
To complete the definition, we add that f ˜ ( X , X ) : = X and if f ˜ ( Y , X ) is defined then f ˜ ( X , Y ) = f ˜ ( Y , X ) . Now we would like to prove that for any ( i , j ) J × J and for any t R if we denote the function attached to k as r k we get that r i t r j t = k f ( ( i , j ) ) r k t .
  • For every k and t R the image of G k t is equal to G k ( S 2 × t ) , the image of p × t is p × p and the image of S 2 p × t is equal to ( φ × I d ) ( ϕ × I d ) g k ( φ × φ ) 1 ( S 2 p × t ) . Since φ is surjective on R 2 , this is equal to ϕ × I D ( g k ( φ × φ ) 1 ( R 2 × t ) ) . So the intersection of the images of G i t and G j t is equal to a p × p union with
    ( ϕ × I d ) g i ( φ × φ ) 1 ( R 2 × t ) ( ϕ × I d ) g j ( φ × φ ) 1 ( R 2 × t )
    which is equal
    ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ( ϕ × I d ) g i ( R 2 × t ) ) ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ( ϕ × I d ) ( g j ) ( R 2 × t ) ) .
    Since ( φ × φ ) 1 and ( ϕ × I d ) are injective, this is equal to ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ϕ × I d ) ( ( g i ( R 2 × t ) ) ( g j ( R 2 × t ) ) ) . From our assumption, we find that g i ( R 2 × t ) ) ( g j ( R 2 × t ) ) = κ f ( i , j ) ( t ) . So applying ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ϕ × I d ) will give us ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ϕ × I d ) ( κ f ( i , j ) ( t ) ) as needed.
  • As in paragraph (1) I m ( G i t ) = p × p ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ϕ × I d ) g k ( φ × φ ) 1 ( R 2 × t ) . Since p × p is also in b j and the image of φ × φ is S 2 p × S 2 p , the intersection is precisely p × p .
  • As in paragraph (1) I m ( G i t ) = p × p g k ( φ × φ ) 1 ( R 2 × t ) . So the intersection with p × p is p × p .
  • First, if there exists j we already proved that ( G i ( t ) ) ( G j ( t ) ) = κ r ( t ) and κ r ( t ) contain only one point, then G i ( t ) κ r ( t ) = κ r ( t ) . Next if j do not exist then as in paragraph (1) I m ( G i t ) = p × p ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ϕ × I d ) g k ( φ × φ ) 1 ( R 2 × t ) and I m ( D i t ) = φ 1 × φ 1 ( ϕ × I d ) κ i . Since ( φ × φ ) 1 and ϕ × I d are injective and do not contain p × p in their image the intersection is equal to ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ϕ × I d ) ( R 2 × t ) ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ϕ × I d ) ( κ r ( t ) ) , so we calculate ( g i ( R 2 × t ) κ r ( t ) ) . By our assumption, this is equal to the empty set. Applying ( φ × φ ) 1 ( ϕ × I d ) will give us the desired conclusion.
  • Trivial.
  • Trivial.
  • Since I m ( D i t ) is a subset of the image of φ 1 × φ 1 which is S 2 p × S 2 p , we get what is needed.
  • Same proof as paragraph (7).
  • Since I m ( D i t ) = φ 1 × φ 1 ( ϕ × I d ) κ i , then
    I m ( D i t ) I m ( D j t ) = φ 1 × φ 1 ( ϕ × I d ) κ i φ 1 × φ 1 ( ϕ × I d ) κ j
    ( φ × φ ) 1 and ( ϕ × I d ) are injective. This is equal to φ 1 × φ 1 ( ϕ × I d ) ( κ i ( t ) κ j ( t ) ) . Since ( κ i ( t ) κ j ( t ) ) = then I m ( D i t ) I m ( D j t ) is also empty.
It is easy to see that for every j J the dimension of the manifold we attach to it is smaller than the dimension of S 2 × S 2 . Now we will prove that for all j , k J if there exist t R such that I m ( r t k ) I m ( r j t ) , then dim ( Q k ) < dim ( Q j ) such that r k is the function attached to k and G k is the manifold attached to k. We note that if I m ( r t k ) I m ( r j t ) then I m ( r t k ) I m ( r j t ) = I m ( r t k ) . Since we know that for any ( i , j ) J × J and for any t R , if we denote the function attached to k as r k we get that r i t r j t = k f ( ( i , j ) ) r k t . If we have i , j that contradicts our statement there must be k where k f ( ( i , j ) ) where dim ( Q i ) = dim ( Q j ) = dim ( Q k ) . It is easy to verify that this is not the case.
So by Theorem 4, S 2 × S 2 ( i = 1 n I m ( G i 0 ) i = 1 n I m ( D i 0 ) ( p × S 2 ) ( S 2 × p ) ( p × p ) ) is homeomorphic to S 2 × S 2 ( i = 1 n I m ( G i 1 ) i = 1 n I m ( D i 1 ) ( p × S 2 ) ( S 2 × p ) ( p × p ) ) . We know that A ( B C ) = ( A C ) ( B C ) . Then it turns out that
S 2 × S 2 ( p × S 2 S 2 × p ) i = 1 n I m ( G i 0 ) i = 1 n I m ( D i 0 ) p × S 2 S 2 × p p × p
is homeomorphic to
S 2 × S 2 ( p × S 2 S 2 × p ) i = 1 n I m ( G i 1 ) i = 1 n I m ( D i 1 ) p × S 2 S 2 × p p × p .
We can see that S 2 × S 2 ( p × S 2 S 2 × p ) = S 2 p × S 2 × p . We know from (1) that I m ( G j t ) = p × p ϕ ( g k ( φ × φ ) 1 ( R 2 × t ) ) , so if we subtract p × p we get I m ( G j t ) ( p × p ) = ( g k ϕ ( φ × φ ) 1 ( R 2 × t ) ) . We can see that the image is inside ( ( S 2 p ) × ( S 2 p ) p × p ) and, therefore,
φ × φ ( I m ( G j t ) ( ( S 2 p ) × ( S 2 p ) p × p ) ) = I m ( g k ϕ ) .
Additionally, since the image of D i t is inside
( ( S 2 p ) × ( S 2 p ) p × p ) ,
φ × φ ( I m ( D i t ) ) = I m ( κ i t ϕ ) and since φ × φ is a homeomorphism on S 2 p × S 2 × p , if we apply it we get that R 4 ( i = 1 n I m ( g i 0 ϕ ) i = 1 n I m ( κ i 0 ϕ ) ) is homeomorphic to R 4 ( i = 1 n I m ( g i 1 ϕ ) i = 1 n I m ( κ i 1 ϕ ) ) . Applying the homeomorphism ϕ will give us that R 4 ( i = 1 n I m ( g i 0 ) i = 1 n I m ( κ i 0 ) ) is homeomorphic to R 4 ( i = 1 n I m ( g i 1 ) i = 1 n I m ( κ i 1 ) ) , as needed. □

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to this paper. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the ISF-NSFC joint research program (grant No. 3210/19).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Randell, R. Lattice-isotopic arrangements are topologically isomorphic. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1989, 107, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nazir, S.; Yoshinaga, M. On the connectivity of the realization spaces of line arrangements. Ann. Della Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa-Classe Sci. 2012, 11, 921–937. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fan, K.M. Position of singularities and fundamental group of the complement of a union of lines. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1996, 124, 3299–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fan, K.M. Direct product of free groups as the fundamental group of the complement of a union of lines. Mich. Math. J. 1997, 44, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Van Kampen, E.R. On the fundamental group of an algebraic curve. Am. J. Math. 1933, 55, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Moishezon, B.G.; Teicher, M. Braid Group Technique in Complex Geometry I, Line Arrangements in CP . Contemp. Math. 1988, 78, 425–555. [Google Scholar]
  7. Garber, D.; Teicher, M.; Vishne, U. Classes of wiring diagrams and their invariants. Topology 2003, 42, 265–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Garber, D.; Teicher, M.; Vishne, U. π1-classification of arrangements up to 8 lines. Topology 2003, 42, 265–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ye, F. Classification of moduli spaces of arrangements of 9 projective lines. Pac. J. Math. 2013, 265, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Amram, M.; Teicher, M.; Ye, F. Moduli spaces of arrangements of 10 projective lines with quadruple points. Adv. Appl. Math. 2013, 3, 392–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Amram, M.; Gong, C.; Teicher, M.; Xu, W. Moduli spaces of arrangements of 11 projective lines with a quintuple point. Turk. J. Math. 2015, 39, 618–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, T.; Yau, S.S.T. Diffeomorphic types of the complements of arrangements of hyperplanes. Compos. Math. 1994, 92, 133–155. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, S.; Yau, S.S.T. Rigidity of differentiable structure for new class of line arrangements. Commun. Anal. Geom. 2005, 13, 1057–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lee, J.M. Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mather, J. Notes on Topological Stability; Harvard University: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1970; Mimeographed Notes; Available online: https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/surgery/mather.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2021).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liberman, E.; Teicher, M. Homeomorphic Arrangements of Smooth Manifolds. Symmetry 2021, 13, 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13060981

AMA Style

Liberman E, Teicher M. Homeomorphic Arrangements of Smooth Manifolds. Symmetry. 2021; 13(6):981. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13060981

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liberman, Eran, and Mina Teicher. 2021. "Homeomorphic Arrangements of Smooth Manifolds" Symmetry 13, no. 6: 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13060981

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop