Next Article in Journal
An Auxetic System Based on Interconnected Y-Elements Inspired by Islamic Geometric Patterns
Next Article in Special Issue
Fault Calculation Method of Distribution Network Based on Deep Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Morphometric Evaluation of Detailed Asymmetry for the Proximal Humerus in Korean Population
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Topology Analysis-Based MMC-HVDC Grid Transmission Capacity Calculation Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Correlation between Dielectric Loss and Partial Discharge of Oil-Pressboard Insulation

1
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
2
State Grid Baoding Electric Power Company Limited, Baoding 071000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2021, 13(5), 864; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13050864
Submission received: 22 April 2021 / Revised: 5 May 2021 / Accepted: 9 May 2021 / Published: 12 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Technologies in Electrical and Electronic Engineering)

Abstract

:
Dielectric loss tanδ and partial discharge (PD) are important indicators for status assessment of oil-pressboard insulation. The correlation characteristics between these two parameters has significance for understanding the material’s degradation and helps to eliminate the information asymmetry for diagnostics. In this paper, the symmetric experimental platform is set up to measure the dielectric loss tanδ and PD for oil-pressboard insulation following the designed testing procedure consisted of raised and rested voltages. Three sets of samples with different water content were tested. The variation mechanism of tanδ with voltage is explained by proposed equivalent circuit, which introduced an asymmetric component representing defect part. PDs are found to be symmetric in the sinusoidal voltage cycles and their statistical parameters are calculated. Besides, the correlation between dielectric loss difference from raised voltage to rested voltage and PD is researched. Strong correlation is observed between dielectric loss and PD, which offers degradation insight for oil-pressboard insulation and helps to eliminate information asymmetry for material status diagnostics.

1. Introduction

Oil-pressboard insulation material is widely used in transformers, bushings, capacitors, etc. [1,2,3]. Dielectric loss tanδ and partial discharge (PD) are the two parameters that are used to assess the insulation status [4,5,6]. As early as 1976, Takahashi E. et al. analyzed the PD characteristics for oil-paper under DC and AC voltages [7]. Later on, researchers studied the PD features under surge voltage [8,9]. Besides the recorded time-resolved data, statistical parameters are used for PD analysis [10,11]. Regarding dielectric loss, besides its own diagnostic function for insulation materials, Ruan J. et al. developed the inversion algorithm to obtain the oil-immersed paper resistivity from dielectric loss for insulation status assessment [12]. Frequency domain spectroscopy measurement is further developed based on dielectric loss to diagnose oil-pressboard [13].
The water content in the oil-pressboard may influence its insulation status, leading to different dielectric loss and/or PD behavior [14,15,16]. Przybylek P. et al. investigated the influence of cellulose insulation ageing and moistening on dielectric losses [17]. Cui Y. et al. proposed a distributed parameter model to reveal the correlation between moisture distribution and the dielectric response parameters of cellulose insulation [18]. Liao R. et al. performed quantitative diagnosis of moisture content in oil-paper insulation based on frequency domain spectroscopy [19].
The relation between PD and water ingress is also researched. Rowland S.M. et al. measured the PD development for wet oil-paper [20]. Ramya M. et al. found that water in pressboard papers makes the partial discharge inception voltage (PDIV) low and the PD occurred frequently, quickly leading to breakdown [21]. Župan T. et al. designed a capsule that can be used in the assessment of water content influence on the condition of the oil-paper insulation [22]. Jiang J. et al. reported that there is a sharp reduction of PDIV or a sudden increase of PD intensity due to moisture in oil-paper insulation [23].
Although great effort has been devoted into oil-pressboard characteristics, to characterize its degradation based on single parameter, e.g., dielectric loss or PD, may create information asymmetry and lead to an incorrect result. Understanding their correlation offers insight into material’s degradation mechanism and new tools for diagnostics, which helps to eliminate the information asymmetry in material assessment. This paper focuses on the correlation between dielectric loss tanδ and PD for oil-pressboard material, which was seldom researched by previous scholars. Parameters with strong correlation are identified in this paper, and the dielectric loss dependency upon PD is explained. The scientific goal is to explore the comprehensive degradation characteristics of oil-paper insulation and understand its mechanism, which is helpful for insulation/equipment condition diagnostics. In this paper, the oil-pressboard samples with different water content were prepared in this paper. The dielectric loss and PD for oil-pressboard insulation are measured simultaneously and their correlation is discussed.
This paper is organized, as follows. Section 2 describes the test setup. Section 3 gives the result of dielectric loss tanδ and PD separately for three samples with different water content. Section 4 discussed the correlation between these two parameters. Section 5 provides conclusions.

2. Test Setup and Measurement Procedure

2.1. Test Setup

The test model of oil-pressboard insulation was constructed, as in Figure 1, based on symmetry principle. The voltage electrodes are round plates with 400 mm diameter for high voltage and 500 mm diameter for grounding electrode, as in Figure 1a. The tested square oil-pressboard is from Weidmann and it has side length of 480 mm and 2 mm thickness, as in Figure 1b.

2.2. Sample Preparation

The samples were prepared as in Figure 2. After cutting and drying, the samples are humidified to have different water content. The samples are weighed hen the humidifying process is finished. With the weight difference, water content is calculated. It is obtained that the water contents for sample B and C are 2.4% and 3.8% separately. While A is the sample without water. More than three samples for each category (A, B, C) were prepared. However, only one test result for each is shown here since they are similar.

2.3. Data Extraction

Figure 3 shows the setup. The rated voltage of testing transformer is 110 kV and its apparent discharge is less than 5 pC. The protection resistor is 10 kΩ. The ratio of voltage divider is 1500:1. A high frequency current probe (HFCT) is used to measure the PD signal. The bandwidth of HFCT is 100 kHz–100 MHz with 1 pC sensitivity. The dielectric loss is characterized by tanδ, which is calculated as (1) by measuring the applied voltage and leakage current, where φi is the current phase for 50 Hz and φu is the voltage phase for 50 Hz. The calculation is performed based on FFT spectrum analysis. The Blackman–Harris window and interpolation technique were applied to eliminate the picket fence effect and leakage spectrum’s effect on FFT, as in [24].
tan δ = tan [ π / 2 ( φ i φ u ) ]
The leakage current is measured with microammeter, whose measurement range is from 100 μA to 700 mA and angle error is within ±0.01°. The partial discharge detector’s sampling frequency is 1 MHz. The test setup fulfills IEC60270. Shielding is considered in the laboratory to guarantee a noise level lower than 5 pC. Dedicated error analysis can be nontrivial [25] and out of the scope of this paper.
Corresponding to Figure 4, the testing procedure is designed, as following:
  • apply 2 kV under which there is no PD. Record voltage and current signal for tanδ calculation;
  • increase voltage with 1 kV step and keep it stable for 1 min;
  • record PD and tanδ data for 5 min. Tanδ data is registered each 30 s, thus 10 data are gathered in 5 min. PD is measured every 6s with recording length of 20 ms, leading to 50 data;
  • decrease the voltage to 2 kV and keep it for 1 min;
  • keep the voltage to be 2 kV for 2.5 min while gathering tanδ data. 5 data are recorded with 30 s time step; and,
  • repeat 2–5 until the voltage reaches 0.8 × Ub(flashover voltage). For sample group A, the stop voltage is 16 kV. For sample group B and C, the stop voltages are 14 kV and 12 kV.

3. Dielectric Loss and Partial Discharge Statistical Parameters

In order to study the correlation between PD and tanδ, firstly their own statistical parameters are analyzed, as below.

3.1. PD Statistical Parameters

Table 1 lists the derived parameters, provided that Hn(q) is the phase-resolved data consisted of charge transfer q, and discharge rate n.
Figure 5a shows the total discharge magnitude qt. Partial discharge increased with voltage and higher water content leads to more discharge. Mean discharge magnitude and maximum discharge magnitude with voltage are shown in Figure 5b,c with a similar trend.
Figure 6a shows the total number of discharges, which indicates that the voltage increase firstly enhanced the PD number and then hindered it. For the increase part, the water content did not have significant effect on the result. However, in the PD decrease part, water content lowered the PD occurring. Figure 6b is the mean width of discharge variation with voltage. It can be seen that, with the increase of voltage, the discharge duration firstly increased and then decreased. For the increase part, water content has positive effect on the pulse duration.
Figure 7a,b show the skewness and kurtosis of Hn(q). These two variables decreased with voltage, while water content also lowered the values. Figure 8 plots the Weibull parameters of Hn(q). Figure 8a clearly shows that water content affected the scale parameter α above 7 kV. Higher water content referred to bigger α. Figure 8b shows the shape parameter β. For samples with water content, β shows a moderate decrease with the voltage. In contrast, this parameter increases a bit with voltage for samples without water.

3.2. Tanδ Statistical Parameters

The average tanδ from step 3 and 5 in Section 2.3 was calculated and is shown in Figure 9. This value increased with voltage and water content. Additionally, there is clear difference for tanδ between Figure 9a,b, which indicates the dielectric loss variation before and after the voltage application.
The difference between these two tanδ is obtained as Equation (2) and it is shown in Figure 10, where tanδU is the result in Figure 9a and tan δ 2 k V U is the result in Figure 9b. It can be seen that the voltage had positive effect on tanδ increase. While under the same voltage, tanδ increase has a positive dependency on water content.
tan δ = tan δ U tan δ 2 k V U
To analyze the tanδ result, an equivalent circuit, as in Figure 11, is proposed. The grey block represents the defect area. The dielectric can be modelled by the double layer structure, as in the left figure of Figure 11, where layer I has defect and its equivalent parameters are R1, C1 while layer II has no defect with equivalent parameters R′ and C′. Obviously, these two layers have different equivalent parameters. Layer II without defect has better insulation capability than layer I with defect. Thus, R′ >> R1, and R′ can be neglected, leading to the circuit in the right part of Figure 11. When voltage U0 is applied, current can be deduced as:
I = U 0 ω 2 C 2 R 1 + j [ ω C + ω 3 C 1 C ( C 1 + C ) R 1 2 ] 1 + ω 2 ( C 1 + C ) 2 R 1 2
here ω = 2πf and f is frequency.
Based on Equation (3), tanδ can be expressed as:
tan δ = 1 / ( ω R 1 C 1 ) C 1 C ( 1 + 1 ω 2 C 1 2 R 1 2 ) + 1 = tan δ d H ( 1 + tan δ d 2 ) + 1
where H = C1/C′ and it is defined as defect factor. When the defect is enlarged, C1 decreases (layer I gets thicker) and C′ increases, which makes H smaller. Tanδd is the dielectric loss for defect part. When tanδd is constant, tanδ is reversely related with H. Figure 12 shows the dependency of tanδ with tanδd and H, where H1 < H2 < H3.
Figure 13 is the tanδ characteristic of sample A. Figure 13a is the measured result and Figure 13b is the ideal tanδ curve for sample A based on Figure 12. When the voltage was lower than 6 kV, PD did not show up severely, both tanδd and H did not vary much, making tanδ increase gently. For the voltage from 7 KV–12 kV, due to PD’s effect, the defect’s dielectric loss tanδd increased. Yet, the defect area did not increase much, which means that H did not change. This can be confirmed by the rather stable curve for sample A in in Figure 9b between 7 kV and 12 kV (after voltage application, dielectric loss did not change). Thus, tanδ increased sharply in this range. For voltage above 12 kV, H decreased, which can be seen in Figure 9b for the rise above 12 kV. Additionally, tanδd increased due to continuous PDs. The combined effect changed the curve from A to B, then to C, as in Figure 13b.
For sample B and C, the tanδ characteristic is analyzed in Figure 14 by taking sample B as an example. There is a tuning point of about 8 kV. This can be explained as tanδd’s increase surpassed the peak, as in Figure 12, due to water effect. If H keeps constant, then the curve decreased (from 8 kV to 10 kV in Figure 14a and point A to B in Figure 14b). With the continuous voltage rise, PD enlarged the defect and lowered the defect factor H. Together with the increase of tanδd due to PD’s effect, the curve shown in Figure 14a increased above 10 kV and the curve in Figure 14b changed from B to D.

4. Correlation between PD and Tanδ

The correlation between PD and tanδ is studied by Pearson’s coefficient. For vector x = (x1, x2,…xn) and y = (y1, y2,…yn), Pearson’s coefficient is calculated, as below:
r = i = 1 n ( x i 1 n i = 1 n x i ) ( y i 1 n i = 1 n y i ) i = 1 n ( x i 1 n i = 1 n x i ) 2 i = 1 n ( y i 1 n i = 1 n y i ) 2
when r is 1, the two vectors are completely positively correlated. When r is −1, the two vectors are completely negatively correlated.

4.1. Correlation between PD and tanδ Statistical Parameters

Table 2 lists the calculated correlation coefficients. All of the shown absolute values are above 0.7, which indicates strong correlation. The detailed data are listed in Figure 15. As in the Figure, although disturbance is observed, correlation is clear between dielectric loss and PD.

4.2. Correlation between PD and Δtanδ

Because no PD was observed when the voltage was lowered to 2 kV, as in Figure 4, Δtanδ can be regarded as the effect the PD during voltage rise.
Tanδ is derived from 50 Hz voltage and current. When there is PD containing 50 Hz component, it will affect the tanδ result. Thus, the 50 Hz component was taken from the PD signal and normalized. The result is compared with tanδ and shown in Figure 16. It can be seen that there is strong correlation between these two variables.
This correlation can be further observed in Figure 17, where a linear relation is shown. To further analyze this phenomenon, PD is simulated based on measured data. Figure 18 shows the typical recorded waveform of PD with reference voltage. The PDs occurred at 0–90° and 180–270°, and they were basically symmetric in the positive and negative cycles. With increase of applied voltage, PD grew, and it covered wider phase range, as in Figure 18b as compared with Figure 18a. For case of ease, the following assumptions are taken for simulated PDs:
  • PDs occur symmetrically with respect to positive and negative cycles;
  • square wave is used to simulate PDs;
  • all PDs have the same amplitude, duration and repetition rate; and,
  • in the positive cycle, the PDs are centered at 45°, while, in the negative cycle, the PDs are centered at 225°.
Figure 19 shows the simulated PDs. Three simulation tests are performed.
  • PD amplitude A is set to 1. PD duration is set to be 10 μs. The time interval between each PD is 20 μs. The number of PDs is set to be 20, 40, and 60. Their effect to the frequency component is analyzed, as in Figure 20. It shows that, with the increase of PD number, the 50 Hz component is also increased.
  • PD duration is set to be 10 μs. The time interval between each PD is 20 μs. The number of PDs is set to be 20. While PD amplitude A is set to be 1–3. Their effect on the frequency component is analyzed, as in Figure 21. Additionally, the amplitude rise will increase the 50 Hz component.
  • PD amplitude A is set to 2. The time interval between each PD is 20 μs. The number of PDs is set to be 40. While PD duration varies as 10 μs, 20 μs, and 30 μs. Their effect on the frequency component is analyzed, as in Figure 22. Again, the duration enlargement will increase the 50 Hz component.

5. Conclusions

For oil-pressboard insulation, the discharge magnitude rises with voltage and water content. Dielectric loss tanδ increased with voltage. However, there is saturation. For oil-pressboard with water, tanδ can even decrease with voltage. An equivalent circuit model is proposed to explain this characteristic, which shows that tanδ is dependent on defect area and the dielectric loss of defect part.
Dielectric loss tanδ is correlated with PD, specifically with total discharge magnitude, total number of discharges, average discharge magnitude, maximum discharge magnitude, average pulse duration of discharge, Weibull scale parameter, skewness, and kurtosis of phase-resolved data consisting of charge transfer and discharge rate. The dielectric loss difference that is obtained from tanδ at raised voltages and rested 2 kV is almost linearly correlated with and contributed by 50 Hz component of PDs.
The strong correlations between dielectric loss and PD, especially between the dielectric loss difference and 50 Hz component of PDs, improves the degradation’s understanding and provides a diagnostic tool for oil-pressboard that helps to eliminate the information asymmetry from single parameter. With the derived data and model, one can observe the correlation between tanδ and PD, with which further study of the degradation process of the oil-pressboard insulation material can be performed, and a multi-source information fusion insulation evaluation technique can be developed to improve the power equipment assessment level.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L. and J.X.; methodology, J.X.; software, J.X.; validation, Y.L., M.L. and J.X.; formal analysis, J.X.; investigation, J.X.; resources, M.L.; data curation, M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L.; visualization, Y.L.; supervision, J.X.; project administration, J.X.; funding acquisition, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, grant number 2018MS081.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, X.; Werle, P.; Gockenbach, E.; Shi, H.; Kuhnke, M. Study of Oil/Pressboard Creeping Discharges under Divergent AC Voltage—Part 1: Fundamental Phenomena and Influencing Factors. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2021, 28, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, L.; Liao, W.; Wang, D.; Wang, D.; Zhang, G.; Cui, Y.; Cai, J. A High-Precision Diagnosis Method for Damp Status of OIP Bushing. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Okabe, S.; Koto, M.; Muraoka, T.; Suganuma, K.; Takahashi, K. Techniques for diagnosing deterioration of oil-impregnated paper-film power capacitors. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 1997, 12, 1751–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Garzem, M.; Grunwald, M.; Schnorrenberg, R.; Schumacher, R.; Humpert, C. Breakdown and Partial Discharge Characteristics of Transformer Board and Insulating Paper Materials in Liquid Nitrogen. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2018, 28, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rajnak, M.; Timko, M.; Kopcansky, P.; Paulovicova, K.; Kuchta, J.; Franko, M.; Kurimsky, J.; Dolnik, B.; Cimbala, R. Transformer oil-based magnetic nanofluid with high dielectric losses tested for cooling of a model transformer. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2019, 26, 1343–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mohsin, M.M.; Narayanachar, M.N.; Nema, R.S. A study of partial discharge characteristics in oil impregnated pressboard insulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, Montreal, QC, Canada, 16–19 June 1996; pp. 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  7. Takahashi, E.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Okuyama, K.; Ogata, F. Partial discharge characteristics of oil-immersed insulation systems under DC, combined AC-DC and DC reversed polarity voltage. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1976, 95, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Burkas, P.D.; Stathopulos, I.A. Partial discharges in the pressboard-oil insulation under switching impulse voltages. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, Braunschweig, Germany, 24–28 August 1987; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wasilenko, E.; Wesolowski, H. Influence of switching impulses on development of partial discharges in oilimpregnated paper insulation. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials, Beijing, China, 12–16 September 1988; pp. 90–93. [Google Scholar]
  10. Raja, K.; Nema, R.S. Comparative statistical aging studies on an oil-pressboard insulation model. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials, Seoul, Korea, 25–30 May 1997; pp. 259–262. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sahoo, N.C.; Salama, M.M.A.; Bartnikas, R. Trends in partial discharge pattern classification: A survey. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2005, 12, 248–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ruan, J.; Xie, Y.; Jin, S.; Shi, Y.; Tian, Y.; Deng, Y. Inversion of Oil-Immersed Paper Resistivity in Transformer Based on Dielectric Loss Factor. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 44050–44058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, X.; Nielsen, S.; Ledwich, G. Frequency domain spectroscopy measurements of oil-paper insulation for energized transformers. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2017, 24, 1657–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Grzybowski, S.; Zahn, M. A new mathematical model of moisture equilibrium in mineral and vegetable oil-paper insulation. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19, 1615–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Badicu, L.V.; Gorgan, B.; Dumitran, L.M.; Notingher, P.V. Assessment of transformer mineral oil condition based on dc and ac conductivity. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19, 1544–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, J.; Fan, X.; Zhang, C.; Lai, C.S.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, H.; Lai, L.L.; Zhang, E. Moisture diagnosis of transformer oil-immersed insulation with intelligent technique and frequency-domain spectroscopy. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics 2021, 17, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Przybylek, P.; Nadolny, Z.; Moscicka-Grzesiak, H. Bubble effect as a consequence of dielectric losses in cellulose insulation. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2010, 17, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cui, Y.; Ma, H.; Saha, T.; Ekanayake, C. Understanding Moisture Dynamics and Its Effect on the Dielectric Response of Transformer Insulation. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2015, 30, 2195–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Liao, R.; Du, Y.; Yang, L.; Gao, J. Quantitative diagnosis of moisture content in oil-paper condenser bushing insulation based on frequency domain spectroscopy and polarisation and depolarisation current. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2017, 11, 1420–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rowland, S.; Wang, M. Fault Development in Wet, Low Voltage, Oil-Impregnated Paper Insulated Cables. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2008, 15, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ramya, M.; Udayakumar, K. Characterization of partial discharge phenomenon on paper insulation under aggravated aging conditions. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 14th International Conference on Dielectric Liquids, ICDL 2002, Graz, Austria, 7–12 July 2002; pp. 433–436. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zupan, T.; Mikulecky, A.; Ziger, I. Ageing, Temperature and Water Content Influence on Oil-Paper Insulation: Model Preparation. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Dielectrics (ICD), Budapest, Hungary, 1–5 July 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang, J.P.; Du, B.X.; Cavallini, A. Effect of moisture migration on surface discharge on oil-pressboard of power transformers under cooling. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2020, 27, 1743–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, Z.; Lu, F.; Li, H. Simulation analysis of dielectric loss angle measured by the Blackman-Harris window interpolation algorithm. High Voltage Eng. (Chin.) 2007, 3, 104–108. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tomczyk, K. Procedure Proposal for Establishing the Class of Dynamic Accuracy for Measurement Sensors Using Simulation Signals with One Constraint. Measurement 2021, 178, 109367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic show and constructed setup for testing. (a) Schematic of test setup; (b) Picture of test setup.
Figure 1. Schematic show and constructed setup for testing. (a) Schematic of test setup; (b) Picture of test setup.
Symmetry 13 00864 g001
Figure 2. Sample preparation with different water content.
Figure 2. Sample preparation with different water content.
Symmetry 13 00864 g002
Figure 3. Setup of partial discharge and tanδ measurement.
Figure 3. Setup of partial discharge and tanδ measurement.
Symmetry 13 00864 g003
Figure 4. Setup of partial discharge and tanδ measurement.
Figure 4. Setup of partial discharge and tanδ measurement.
Symmetry 13 00864 g004
Figure 5. (a) Relation between total discharge magnitude and voltage; (b) Relation between mean discharge magnitude and voltage; (c) Relation between maximum discharge magnitude and voltage.
Figure 5. (a) Relation between total discharge magnitude and voltage; (b) Relation between mean discharge magnitude and voltage; (c) Relation between maximum discharge magnitude and voltage.
Symmetry 13 00864 g005
Figure 6. (a) Relation between total number of discharges and voltage; (b) Relation between mean pulse width of discharge and voltage.
Figure 6. (a) Relation between total number of discharges and voltage; (b) Relation between mean pulse width of discharge and voltage.
Symmetry 13 00864 g006
Figure 7. (a) Relation between skewness of Hn(q) and voltage; (b) Relation between kurtosis of Hn(q) and voltage.
Figure 7. (a) Relation between skewness of Hn(q) and voltage; (b) Relation between kurtosis of Hn(q) and voltage.
Symmetry 13 00864 g007
Figure 8. (a) Weibull scale parameter of Hn(q); (b) Weibull shape parameter of Hn(q).
Figure 8. (a) Weibull scale parameter of Hn(q); (b) Weibull shape parameter of Hn(q).
Symmetry 13 00864 g008
Figure 9. (a) Tanδ after rise to different voltages; (b) Tanδ at rested 2kV after rise to different voltages.
Figure 9. (a) Tanδ after rise to different voltages; (b) Tanδ at rested 2kV after rise to different voltages.
Symmetry 13 00864 g009
Figure 10. Dependency of Δtanδ with voltage.
Figure 10. Dependency of Δtanδ with voltage.
Symmetry 13 00864 g010
Figure 11. Equivalent circuit model of insulation with defect.
Figure 11. Equivalent circuit model of insulation with defect.
Symmetry 13 00864 g011
Figure 12. Tanδ of insulation characteristic upon defect factor H and tanδd.
Figure 12. Tanδ of insulation characteristic upon defect factor H and tanδd.
Symmetry 13 00864 g012
Figure 13. (a) Tanδ characteristic of sample A; (b) Schematic ideal tanδ characteristic for sample A.
Figure 13. (a) Tanδ characteristic of sample A; (b) Schematic ideal tanδ characteristic for sample A.
Symmetry 13 00864 g013
Figure 14. (a) tanδ characteristic of sample B; (b) schematic ideal tanδ characteristic for sample B.
Figure 14. (a) tanδ characteristic of sample B; (b) schematic ideal tanδ characteristic for sample B.
Symmetry 13 00864 g014
Figure 15. (a) Total discharge magnitude with tanδ; (b) Total number of discharges with tanδ; (c) Mean discharges mag-nitude with tanδ; (d) Maximum discharges magnitude with tanδ; (e) Mean pulse width of discharge with tanδ; (f) Skew-ness of Hn(q) with tanδ; (g) Kurtosis of Hn(q) with tanδ; and, (h) Weibull coefficient of Hn(q) with tanδ.
Figure 15. (a) Total discharge magnitude with tanδ; (b) Total number of discharges with tanδ; (c) Mean discharges mag-nitude with tanδ; (d) Maximum discharges magnitude with tanδ; (e) Mean pulse width of discharge with tanδ; (f) Skew-ness of Hn(q) with tanδ; (g) Kurtosis of Hn(q) with tanδ; and, (h) Weibull coefficient of Hn(q) with tanδ.
Symmetry 13 00864 g015aSymmetry 13 00864 g015b
Figure 16. Comparison between tanδ and normalized 50 Hz component from PDs. (a) is for sample A, (b) is for sample B, and (c) is for sample C.
Figure 16. Comparison between tanδ and normalized 50 Hz component from PDs. (a) is for sample A, (b) is for sample B, and (c) is for sample C.
Symmetry 13 00864 g016
Figure 17. Relation between Δtanδ and normalized 50 Hz component from PDs.
Figure 17. Relation between Δtanδ and normalized 50 Hz component from PDs.
Symmetry 13 00864 g017
Figure 18. (a) Measured PD signal with reference voltage; (b) Measured PD signal with higher reference voltage.
Figure 18. (a) Measured PD signal with reference voltage; (b) Measured PD signal with higher reference voltage.
Symmetry 13 00864 g018
Figure 19. Simulated PDs with reference voltage.
Figure 19. Simulated PDs with reference voltage.
Symmetry 13 00864 g019
Figure 20. Total number of discharge effect on PD’s amplitude-frequency result.
Figure 20. Total number of discharge effect on PD’s amplitude-frequency result.
Symmetry 13 00864 g020
Figure 21. Discharge magnitude effect on PD’s amplitude-frequency result.
Figure 21. Discharge magnitude effect on PD’s amplitude-frequency result.
Symmetry 13 00864 g021
Figure 22. Pulse duration of discharge effect on PD’s amplitude-frequency result.
Figure 22. Pulse duration of discharge effect on PD’s amplitude-frequency result.
Symmetry 13 00864 g022
Table 1. Derived parameters for PD measurement.
Table 1. Derived parameters for PD measurement.
ParameterUnitMeaning
qtpCtotal discharge magnitude
nt-total number of discharges
qavgpCmean discharge magnitude
qmaxpCmaximum discharge magnitude
σ°mean pulse width of discharge
Sk-skewness of Hn(q)
Ku-kurtosis of Hn(q)
α-Weibull scale parameter of Hn(q)
β-Weibull shape parameter of Hn(q)
Table 2. Correlation coefficient with tanδ.
Table 2. Correlation coefficient with tanδ.
qtntqavgqmaxσSkKuα
A0.728−0.7340.7670.7120.962−0.734−0.8180.718
B0.804−0.7090.8190.8090.871−0.762−0.8120.744
C0.837−0.7080.8080.7960.847−0.770−0.8370.766
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Li, M.; Xie, J. Correlation between Dielectric Loss and Partial Discharge of Oil-Pressboard Insulation. Symmetry 2021, 13, 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13050864

AMA Style

Li Y, Li M, Xie J. Correlation between Dielectric Loss and Partial Discharge of Oil-Pressboard Insulation. Symmetry. 2021; 13(5):864. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13050864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yan, Min Li, and Jun Xie. 2021. "Correlation between Dielectric Loss and Partial Discharge of Oil-Pressboard Insulation" Symmetry 13, no. 5: 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13050864

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop