Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Gamma Law for Settling Velocity and Trapping Capacity Analysis of Suspended Particles in a Dam Reservoir (Lobo River in Côte d’Ivoire)
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantification of Groundwater Hazards Related to Fluvial Floods via Groundwater Flow Modelling: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Salinity of the Vistula River Based on Patrol Monitoring and State Environmental Monitoring
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Impact of Groundwater Model Parametrization on Calibration Fit and Prediction Accuracy—Assessment in the Form of a Post-Audit at the SLOVNAFT Oil Refinery Site, in Slovakia

Water 2023, 15(5), 839; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050839
by Martin Zatlakovič 1,*, Dávid Krčmář 1, Kamila Hodasová 1, Ondra Sracek 2, Štefan Marenčák 3, Ľubica Durdiaková 3 and Alexander Bugár 1,3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Water 2023, 15(5), 839; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050839
Submission received: 25 January 2023 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 17 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling of Groundwater Flow)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Contribution is interesting, to my opinion too many abbreviations.

Corrections:

line 10 ... should be Faculty of Science ,...

line 36 ... the figure over the Keywords???

line 37 ... keywords separated by dots? (semicolon or comma)

line 104 ... 39 km2 ?

line 132 ... 5.10-2 ?

line 134 ... Ky = Kxy/5 ... why? (no reference)

line 148 ... figure 3 ... should be Quaternary

line 150 ... should be better (vertical exaggeration 1:20)

line 246 ... figure 5 ... explain the differenece in red and blue dots.

line 267 ... should be Horizontal.

line 263 ... The EVT value depends on groundwater level depth under the surface. There is no mention about that data (everywher is just the altitude!). Do you think it has any sence to consider it (value on the line 290) for groundwater flow modeling? 

line 377 ... 1.10-11 ...?

Explain, why did you choose the years 2008 (calibration) and 2019 (prediction). Are they somehow specific from hydrological point of view?

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The introduction and literature needs to improvements and more study about the study problem

Author Response

We thank reviewer for the comments which helped to improve our manuscript.

The introduction and literature has been improved.
Back to TopTop