Next Article in Journal
Thermal Properties and Non-Isothermal Crystallization Kinetics of Poly (δ-Valerolactone) and Poly (δ-Valerolactone)/Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Design of a Society of Automotive Engineers Regular Curved Retroreflector for Enhancing Optical Efficiency and Working Area
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical Properties, Electronic Structures, and Debye Temperature of NixBy Compounds Obtained by the First Principles Calculations

1
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, 1 Qing Hua Yuan, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2018, 8(12), 451; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8120451
Submission received: 23 October 2018 / Revised: 26 November 2018 / Accepted: 27 November 2018 / Published: 30 November 2018

Abstract

:
Mechanical properties, electronic properties, and Debye temperatures of NixBy (Ni3B, Ni2B, Ni4B3 and NiB) compounds were obtained by the first principles calculations based on the density functional theory (DFT). The results showed that the formation enthalpy of the NixBy compounds were stable with negative formation enthalpy. NiB had the largest B, G, and E, and the smallest υ; it also had the highest hardness (10.8 GPa) and Debye temperature (681.8 K). Ni4B3 had the strongest anisotropy. It was found that the valence bonds of the NixBy compounds studied were composed of both metal bond and covalent bond, and the mechanical properties and Debye temperature of the NixBy compounds increased with the increase of the B atomic ratio.

1. Introduction

Nickel-based alloy powders are widely adopted in surface modification due to their good wettability, superior high-temperature properties, and moderate price [1,2]. Nickel (Ni) and boron (B) can generate different Ni-B binary compounds, which have an important effect on the properties of the coatings [3]. Appropriate B can prevent liquid metal oxidation and reduce the inclusion in the coating [4]. However, excessive B will increase the crack susceptibility of the coatings and should be avoided [5]. Researchers have carried out a lot of experimental studies on the properties of Ni-B binary compounds [6,7,8,9]. Laser cladding is a new type of surface modification technology, in which some powders of special properties are cladded onto the surface of a substrate [10,11]. Compared with other traditional surface modification technologies, it can create coatings with better mechanical properties [12,13]. However, the studies are very limited on the effect of Ni-B binary compounds on the Ni-based laser cladding layer properties. It is very expensive to analyze the effects of different Ni-B contents by experimental method.
In recent years, computational materials science has been developing rapidly with the continuous development of computer technology. It can be used to predict the structure and properties of materials, improve efficiency, and reduce cost in production [14]. The first principles method based on density functional theory has been used to investigate the properties of NixBy compounds. Researchers have studied some NixBy compounds in different systems. Shein et al. [15] calculated the lattice constant, magnetic properties, and formation energy of Ni3B, which indicated that the strong stability of Ni3B was due to the strong Ni–B hybridization. Zhou et al. [16] researched the stability, electronic, and structural properties of X2B (X = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Mo, and W) compounds. Zhou et al. [17] investigated the electronic structure and mechanical properties of NiB, which is predicted to be a promising interphase material for future ultrahigh-temperature ceramic fiber reinforced ceramic matrix (UHTCF/UHTC) composites. However, there is no literature that studied the effects of different ratios of Ni to B on the mechanical properties, electronic properties, and Debye temperature of NixBy compounds.
In our previous research work, Ni-based composite coating was obtained by Ni-based self-fluxing alloy powders [18], but there was no deep and comprehensive research on the properties of NixBy compounds. In this study, the mechanical properties, electronic properties, and Debye temperature of NixBy compounds were calculated by using the first-principles. The obtained results could provide guidance for the properties of Ni-based laser cladding layers.

2. Methods

In this paper, mechanical properties, electronic properties, and Debye temperature of NixBy compounds were calculated based on density functional theory (DFT) by CASTEP [19]. Kohn-Shan equation was calculated by Perthew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) method in the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). The ultrasoft pseudopotential was used to describe the interactions between valence electrons and ionic cores [20]. The valence electrons of Ni and B are 3p63d84s2 and 2s22p1, respectively. The crystals structures of these NixBy compounds are shown in Figure 1. The coordinates of Ni3B are Ni (0.180, 0.063, 0.156), (0.028, 0.250, 0.633) and B (0.618, 0.750, 0.561). The coordinates of Ni2B are Ni (0.170, 0.330, 0) and B (0.500, 0.500, 0.250). The coordinates of Ni4B3 are Ni (0.175, 0.064, 0.346), (0.019, 0.250, 0.869) and B (0.887, 0.250, 0.420). The coordinates of NiB are Ni (0, 0.147, 0.250) and B (0.5, 0.067, 0.750). To optimize equilibrium crystal parameters and the atomic position of these NixBy compounds, the Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shannon (BFGS) algorithm was used. According to the convergence results, the maximum cut-off energy of the plane wave was taken as 500 eV. The Monkhorst–Pack was used to characterize energy integration in the first irreducible Brillouin zone (BZ), and the k point mesh was adopted 16 × 16 × 16. The total energy changes during the optimization process were finally converged to 2 × 10−6 eV, and the maximum force on the atoms was below 0.001 eV/Å.
The thermodynamic stability of the compounds is related to formation enthalpy. A compound is thermodynamically stable when the formation enthalpy of the compound is negative. The smaller the values of the formation enthalpy, the more stable is the compound. The formation enthalpy can be calculated by following equation [21]:
Δ r H m ( N i x B y ) = E t o t a l ( N i x B y ) x E b u l k ( N i ) y E b u l k ( B ) n
where Δ r H m ( N i x B y ) , E t o t a l , E b u l k , and n are the formation enthalpy, the total energy, the chemical potential, and the sum of the number of atoms, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Stability

To ensure reliability of the calculation, the structure of crystal was first optimized and then the lattice parameters under 0 K were obtained. Optimized lattice parameters are listed in Table 1. The error between our results and predecessors calculation data was less than 3.0%, which proved that the parameters used in this research were reliable. The formation enthalpy of NixBy compounds calculated using Equation (1) is shown in Table 1. The formation enthalpies of Ni3B, Ni2B, Ni4B3, and NiB are −32.819 kJ/mol, −35.848 kJ/mol, −36.026 kJ/mol, and −32.547 kJ/mol, respectively. The formation enthalpies are all negative, which indicate that these NixBy compounds are thermodynamically stable. Ni4B3 has more thermodynamic stability than other compounds because its formation enthalpy is the lowest.

3.2. Mechanical Properties

3.2.1. Elastic Constant and Elastic Modulus

Mechanical properties are related to elastic constants Cij, which are determined by the bond strength between the atoms, and are the scientific basis in designing and developing new materials [26]. The stress-strain method is used to evaluate the elastic constants of these Ni-B compounds. The strain-stress curve is described by the Hooke’s law, which is given by following equation [27]:
σ ij = C i j k l ε k l
where σij is the stress tensor, εkl is the strain tensor, and Cijkl is the elastic constant tensor which is a 6×6 matrix (36 elements in general cases). The elastic constants are calculated as follows [26]:
( σ 1 σ 2 σ 3 τ 1 τ 2 τ 3 ) = ( C 11 C 12 C 13 C 14 C 15 C 16 C 22 C 23 C 24 C 25 C 26 C 33 C 34 C 35 C 36 C 44 C 45 C 46 C 55 C 56 C 66 ) ( ε 1 ε 2 ε 3 γ 1 γ 2 γ 3 )
where σi and τi are the normal stress and the shear stress, respectively. Cij is the elastic constant. εi and γi are the shearing strain and the normal strain, respectively.
Born–Huang lattice dynamical theory can judge the mechanical stability of the compounds and it needs to meet the following criteria [28,29,30]:
Orthorhombic phases (for Ni3B, Ni4B3, and NiB)
C 11 > 0 , C 11 C 22 > C 12 2 , C 11 C 22 C 33 + 2 C 12 C 13 C 23 C 11 C 23 2 C 22 C 13 2 C 33 C 12 2 > 0 , C 44 > 0 , C 55 > 0 , C 66 > 0
Tetragonal phase (for Ni2B)
C 11 > 0 , C 22 > 0 , C 33 > 0 , C 44 > 0 , C 55 > 0 , C 66 > 0 , C 11 + C 33 2 C 13 > 0 , 2 ( C 11 + C 12 ) + C 33 + 4 C 13 > 0
Table 2 shows the elastic constants of NixBy compounds. Examining the data against Equations (2)–(3), it can be found that these NixBy compounds meet the criteria of mechanical stability. Therefore, Ni3B, Ni2B, Ni4B3, and NiB are mechanically stable structures.
Elastic properties are mainly determined by elastic modulus. Bulk modulus (B), Young’s modulus (E), shear modulus (G), and Poisson’s ratio (υ) can be calculated by Voigt-Reuss-Hill (VRH) approximation [31]. VRH approximation is mainly based on the symmetry of the crystal, which is the average value of the lower limit value of Voigt and the upper limit value of Reuss. VRH approximation provides methods to estimate the mechanical properties of compounds from elastic constants [32]. The equations are as follows [33,34]:
B = 1 2 ( B V + B R )
G = 1 2 ( G V + G R )
E = 9 B G 3 B + G
υ = 3 B 2 G 2 ( 3 B + G )
where BV, BR, GV, and GR are the bulk modulus and the shear modulus calculated by Voigt and Reuss, respectively.
The calculation results are shown in Table 3. Bulk modulus is a parameter that reflects the resistance of material to volume change, and it can characterize the ability of material to resist deformation. In general, the larger a bulk modulus, the higher is the hardness of the compound [35]. The bulk modulus of Ni3B, Ni2B, Ni4B3, and NiB are 234.8 GPa, 256.6 GPa, 262.1 GPa, and 260.7 GPa, respectively. With the increase of B atomic ratio, bulk modulus of NixBy increases. Bulk modulus of NiB is the largest, which implies that the NiB has the highest hardness. Shear modulus and Young’s modulus represent the resistance to elastic deformation (or stiffness) under shear and normal stresses. Shear modulus (122.8 GPa) and Young’s modulus (318.5 GPa) of NiB are also the highest, which indicate that NiB has the greatest resistance to elastic deformation. The ratio of bulk modulus and shear modulus (B/G) can be used to judge whether a compound is brittle or ductile. The compound is ductile when the B/G value is higher than 1.75; otherwise the compound is brittle [36]. The B/G values of these NixBy compounds are all greater than 1.75, so they are all ductile. Poisson’s ratio can also be used to characterize the brittleness or ductility of a material. A compound exhibits ductility (brittleness) when the Poisson’s ratio is larger than (smaller than) 0.26 [37]. The Poisson’s ratios are also shown in Table 3. Poisson’s ratios of these NixBy compounds are all larger than 0.26, which indicates that they have good ductility. From the results of the B/G values and the Poisson’s ratios, it can be found that the ductility of the NixBy compounds gradually decreases as the B atomic ratio increases.

3.2.2. Anisotropy

Anisotropy can help to understand mechanical properties of compounds [34]. Elastic anisotropy of NixBy compounds can be estimated through the elastic constants of anisotropic index. In this study, the universal anisotropic index (AU), the percent anisotropy (AB and AG) are calculated to characterize the anisotropy. The equations are as follows [27]:
A U = 5 G V G R + B V B R 6 0
A B = B V B R B V + B R
A G = G V G R G V + G R
where BV, BR, GV, and GR are the bulk moduli and shear moduli obtained by the Voigt and Reuss method, respectively.
In addition, shear anisotropy needs to be considered because these NixBy compounds can assume orthorhombic and tetragonal crystal structures. The shear anisotropic factors A1, A2, and A3 are defined as follows [38]:
A 1 = 4 C 44 C 11 + C 33 2 C 13
A 2 = 4 C 55 C 22 + C 33 2 C 23
A 3 = 4 C 66 C 11 + C 22 2 C 12
The results of AU, AB, AG, A1, A2, and A3 are shown in Table 4. It can be seen from Table 4 that the values of A1, A2, and A3 are not equal, which indicates that these NixBy compounds are shear anisotropic. The AB values are very small, which indicate that these NixBy compounds have weak anisotropy in bulk modulus. AG values of these compounds are greater than the AB value, which suggests that the differences of shear modulus of Voigt and Reuss have a more significant impact on AU value than bulk modulus. The larger the value of AU, the greater is the anisotropy [39]. The AU values of Ni3B, Ni2B, Ni4B3, and NiB are 0.167, 0.099, 0.196, and 0.174, respectively. Therefore, the order of the anisotropy for these NixBy compound is Ni4B3 > NiB > Ni3B > Ni2B. With the increase of the B atomic ratio, the anisotropy is strengthened.
To characterize the Young’s modulus anisotropy of these NixBy compounds more intuitively, the spherical orientation is used in different directions. The directional dependence of Young’s modulus for different type crystals is given by following equations [40,41]:
Orthorhombic crystal [40]
1 / E = l 1 4 S 11 + l 2 4 S 22 + l 3 4 S 33 + 2 l 1 2 l 2 2 S 12 + 2 l 1 2 l 3 2 S 13 + 2 l 2 2 l 3 2 S 23 + l 2 2 l 3 2 S 44 + l 1 2 l 3 2 S 55 + l 1 2 l 2 2 S 66
Tetragonal crystal [41]
1 / E = ( l 1 4 + l 2 4 ) S 11 + l 3 4 S 33 + l 1 2 l 2 2 ( 2 S 12 + S 66 ) + l 3 2 ( 1 l 3 2 ) ( 2 S 13 + S 44 ) + 2 l 1 l 2 ( l 1 2 l 2 2 ) S 16
where Sij are the elastic compliance constants, l1, l2 and l3 are the directional cosines in spherical coordinates with respect to θ and φ (l1 = sin θcos φ, l2 = sin θsin φ, l3 = cos φ). The more irregular the sphere, the greater is the anisotropy [42]. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the shape of Ni4B3 is the most irregular and Ni4B3 is the most regular, which indicate that the anisotropy of Ni4B3 is the greatest. This is consistent with above results of the anisotropy index.
The projections on the X-Y plane, X-Z plane, and Y-Z plane show more details about the anisotropy of Young’s modulus as shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the Young’s modulus of these NixBy compounds have great difference in different axles. The planar contour of Ni4B3 is the most irregular and Ni2B is the most regular, which indicate that the anisotropy of Ni4B3 is the greatest and the anisotropy of Ni2B is the least. This is also consistent with the result of the anisotropy index presented above.

3.2.3. Hardness

Hardness is an important mechanical index that reflects the resistance to localized plastic deformation of a material. In general, wear resistance of material is positively correlated with hardness, which depends on shear modulus and bulk modulus [43]. The hardness (HV) of the NixBy compounds was calculated using the following equations [44]:
H V = 2 ( k 2 G ) 0.585 3
k = G B
where G and B are shear modulus and bulk modulus, respectively.
The hardness of the NixBy compounds is shown in Figure 4. The hardness values of Ni3B, Ni2B, Ni4B3, and NiB are 8.2 GPa, 9.3 GPa, 10.0 GPa, and 10.8 GPa, respectively. NiB has the highest hardness, which is consistent with bulk modulus discussed above. With the increase of B atomic ratio, the hardness increases, which also indicates the ductility of the NixBy compound decreases.

3.3. Electronic Structures

Electronic structure and characteristics of chemical bonds can be characterized by density of state (DOS). Figure 5 shows total density of states (TDOS) and partial electronic density of states (PDOS) of these NixBy compounds. Two main peaks are observed in the TDOS of NixBy compounds. The electronic structure are mainly determined by B-p band and Ni-d band. In addition, the fermi levels are also determined by Ni-d band and a small amount of B-p band, which indicates that these NixBy compounds exhibit p-d hybridization and the bond between the Ni and B atom is in the form of a covalent bond. NixBy compounds also have metal bonds because the TDOS values are greater than zero at the fermi level. Therefore, it can be concluded that the valence bonds of these NixBy compounds are composed of both metal bond and covalent bond.
The population analysis can provide more insightful information on chemical bonds of these NixBy compounds, the results are listed in Table 5. The Mulliken method is used to calculate the overlap population and the charge. Average bond strength ( L ¯ ( AB ) ) and mean overlap population ( n ¯ A B ) can be calculated by the following equations [16]:
L ¯ ( AB ) = i L i N i i N i
n ¯ A B = i n i A B N i i N i
where Ni is the total number of i bond and the Li is the bond length of i type.
As can be seen from Table 5, for all of the NixBy compounds, B atoms and Ni atoms carry the negative charge and the positive charge, respectively. The charge value of Ni atom varies from 0.19 (Ni3B) to 0.54 (NiB). With the increase of B atomic ratio, the charge values of Ni in the NixBy compounds increase. There are two electron transfer paths in the NixBy compound: one is inside the Ni atom and the B atom, and the other is between the Ni atom and the B atom. The one refers to p–d hybridization covalent bond between B and Ni, and the other one is induced by the metal or weak covalent bonding among Ni atoms. In the former case, the electrons are transferred from Ni atom to B atom. The values of overlap population of Ni-Ni bond are negative, which indicate that there is an anti-bond state or strong electrostatic repulsion between Ni-Ni bond. The strengths of B-B and B-Ni covalent bonds are increased with the increase of B content. In summary, the valence bonds of these NixBy compounds are composed of the metal bond and the covalent bond.

3.4. Debye Temperature

During the laser cladding process, compound undergoes rapid heating and cooling, so studying the thermodynamic properties of the material is very important. Debye temperature and sound velocity are important parameters for thermodynamic properties, which are related to the chemical bonding characteristics and thermal properties of NixBy compounds [45]. Debye temperature and sound velocity can be calculated by following equations [46,47,48]:
Θ D = h k B [ 3 n 4 π ( N A ρ M ) ] 1 / 3 v m
v m = [ 1 3 ( 2 v s 3 + 1 v 1 3 ) ] 1 / 3
v 1 = [ ( B + 4 3 G ) 1 ρ ] 1 / 2
v s = ( G / ρ ) 1 / 2
where h, kB, n, ρ, NA, and M are, respectively, the Planck constant, Boltzmann constant, the number of atoms, the density, the Avogadro constant, and the molar mass of the compound. v m , v 1 , and v s are respectively the average speed of sound, the velocity of the longitudinal sound and transverse velocity.
The values of Debye temperatures and sound velocities of Ni3B, Ni2B, Ni4B3, and NiB are calculated and listed in Table 6. The order of Debye temperatures for NixBy compounds are NiB > Ni4B3 > Ni2B > Ni3B. The Debye temperature of NiB is the highest (681.8 K), so the thermodynamic stability of NiB is superior to other Ni-B compounds. With the increase of the B atomic ratio, the Debye temperatures of these NixBy compounds increase. The longitudinal velocity and transverse velocity are correlated to the bulk modulus, shear modulus, and the density of the compound. The compounds with large bulk modulus and the low density will have large sound velocity. Hence, NiB has the highest sound velocity among these NixBy compounds because it has the highest shear modulus and bulk modulus. This conclusion can also be used to explain the sound velocity of other compounds.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the results showed that mechanical properties, electronic properties, and Debye temperature of NixBy compounds with different atomic ratios are different. This can provide theoretical guidance for material design in the laser cladding layer and help to account for changes in performance under different Ni and B ratios. The conclusions are drawn as follows:
(1)
The calculated lattice parameters are consistent with the predecessor calculation data. The formation energy of all NixBy compounds is negative, which indicates that all NixBy compounds have stable structures.
(2)
NixBy compounds have mechanical stability. NiB has the largest bulk modulus, shear modulus and Young’s modulus and the smallest Poisson’s ratio, which imply that the hardness of NiB is higher than other NixBy compounds. NixBy compounds exhibit anisotropic characteristics, and Ni4B3 had the greatest anisotropy. The mechanical properties of the NixBy compounds increase with the increase of the B atomic ratio.
(3)
NixBy compounds exhibit p-d hybridization and they exhibit the metal bond and the covalent bond.
(4)
NiB has largest Debye temperature (7681.8 K), which indicates that NiB has the highest thermodynamic stability. Debye temperature of the NixBy compounds increase with the increase of the B atomic ratio.

Author Contributions

K.W., D.D. and B.C. conceived and designed the experiments; K.W. and Y.H. performed the experiments; K.W., J.J. and S.S. analyzed the data; H.F. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; K.W. and B.C. wrote the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by [National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number [51675303], [National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number [51605251], [National Key Research and Development Program of China] grant number [2017YFB1103303], and [the Tribology Science Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Tribology] grant number [SKLT2018B05].

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support to this work from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51675303, No51605251), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB1103303), and the Tribology Science Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Tribology (SKLT2018B05).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farahmand, P.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Kovacevic, R. Laser cladding assisted by induction heating of Ni–WC composite enhanced by nano-WC and La2O3. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 15421–15438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, K.; Fu, H.; Li, Y.; Lei, Y.; Wei, S.; Su, Z. Effect of power on microstructure and properties of laser cladding NiCrBSi composite coating. Trans. Inst. Met. Finish. 2017, 95, 328–336. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, C.H.; Bai, Y.; Chen, W.; Ye, X.C. Boron Influence on Structures and Properties in Nickel-Based Alloys. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 395–396, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. González, R.; García, M.A.; Peñuelas, I.; Cadenas, M.; Fernández, M.D.R.; Battez, A.H.; Felgueroso, D. Microstructural study of NiCrBSi coatings obtained by different processes. Wear 2007, 263, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ma, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, K. Investigation on cored-eutectic structure in Ni60/WC composite coatings fabricated by wide-band laser cladding. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 645, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, Z.J.; Ge, S.H.; Zhang, M.H.; Li, W.; Mu, S.C.; Tao, K.Y. Controlled Synthesis of Supported Nickel Boride Catalyst Using Electroless Plating. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 8587–8593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Choi, J.W.; Hwang, G.H.; Han, W.K.; Kang, S.G. Phase transformation of Ni-B, Ni-P diffusion barrier deposited electrolessly on Cu interconnect. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 2171–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eraslan, S.; Ürgen, M. Oxidation behavior of electroless Ni-P, Ni-B and Ni-W-B coatings deposited on steel substrates. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 265, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Anik, M.; Körpe, E.; Şen, E. Effect of coating bath composition on the properties of electroless nickel–boron films. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 1718–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, K.; Chang, B.; Chen, J.; Fu, H.; Lin, Y.; Lei, Y. Effect of Molybdenum on the Microstructures and Properties of Stainless Steel Coatings by Laser Cladding. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hou, X.; Du, D.; Wang, K.; Hong, Y.; Chang, B. Microstructure and Wear Resistance of Fe-Cr-Mo-Co-CB Amorphous Composite Coatings Synthesized by Laser Cladding. Metals 2018, 8, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Q.; Lei, Y.; Fu, H. Growth mechanism, distribution characteristics and reinforcing behavior of (Ti, Nb)C particle in laser cladded Fe-based composite coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 316, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, K.; Chang, B.; Lei, Y.; Fu, H.; Lin, Y. Effect of Cobalt on Microstructure and Wear Resistance of Ni-Based Alloy Coating Fabricated by Laser Cladding. Metals 2017, 7, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, Y.; Xing, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, L.; Wang, Y. A first principles study of adhesion and electronic structure at Fe (110)/graphite (0001) interface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 405, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shein, I.R.; Medvedeva, N.I.; Ivanovskii, A.L. Electronic and structural properties of cementite-type M3X (M = Fe, Co, Ni; X = C or B) by first principles calculations. Physica B 2006, 371, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, C.T.; Xing, J.D.; Xiao, B.; Feng, J.; Xie, X.J.; Chen, Y.H. First principles study on the structural properties and electronic structure of X2B (X = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Mo and W) compounds. Comp. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 1056–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, Y.; Xiang, H.; Feng, Z.; Li, Z. Electronic Structure and Mechanical Properties of NiB: A Promising Interphase Material for Future UHTCf/UHTC Composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 99, 2110–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, K.; Li, Y.; Fu, H.; Lei, Y.; Su, Z.; Ma, P. A study of laser cladding NiCrBSi/Mo composite coatings. Surf. Eng. 2018, 34, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, K.; Fan, H.; Ren, P.; Yang, C. Structural, electronic and optical properties of BiFeO3 studied by first-principles. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 1901–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Skylaris, C.K. A benchmark for materials simulation. Science 2016, 351, 1394–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ravi, C. First-principles study of crystal structure and stability of AlMgSi(Cu) precipitates. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 4213–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Connétable, D.; Thomas, O. First-principles study of the structural, electronic, vibrational, and elastic properties of orthorhombic NiSi. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 094101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schaefer, Z.L.; Ke, X.; Schiffer, P.; Schaak, R.E. Direct Solution Synthesis, Reaction Pathway Studies, and Structural Characterization of Crystalline Ni3B Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 19846–19851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kong, Y.; Xiong, W.; Guo, H.; Sun, W.; Du, Y.; Zhou, Y. Elastic and thermodynamic properties of the Ni–B system studied by first-principles calculations and experimental measurements. Calphad 2010, 34, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fujimori, M.; Nakata, T.; Nakayama, T.; Nishibori, E.; Kimura, K.; Takata, M.; Sakata, M. Peculiar covalent bonds in alpha-rhombohedral boron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 4452–4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.H.; Chong, X.Y.; Jiang, Y.H.; Zhou, R.; Feng, J. Mechanical properties and electronic structures of Fe-Al intermetallic. Physica B 2017, 506, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, B.; Feng, J.; Zhou, C.T.; Jiang, Y.H.; Zhou, R. Mechanical properties and chemical bonding characteristics of Cr7C3 type multicomponent carbides. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 023507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Xiao, B.; Min, T.; Fan, Z.; Ma, S.; Xu, L. Theoretical study on the stability, elasticity, hardness and electronic structures of W–C binary compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 502, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maibam, J.; Indrajit Sharma, B.; Bhattacharjee, R.; Thapa, R.K.; Brojen Singh, R.K. Electronic structure and elastic properties of scandium carbide and yttrium carbide: A first principles study. Physcia B 2011, 406, 4041–4045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Feng, J.; Xiao, B.; Chen, J.; Du, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhou, R. Stability, thermal and mechanical properties of PtxAly compounds. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 3231–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qi, C.J.; Jiang, Y.H.; Liu, Y.Z.; Zhou, R. Elastic and electronic properties of XB2 (X = V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo, and W) with AlB2 structure from first principles calculations. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 5843–5851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, J.; Xiao, B.; Zhou, R.; Pan, W.; Clarke, D.R. Anisotropic elastic and thermal properties of the double perovskite slab–rock salt layer Ln2SrAl2O7 (Ln = La, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd or Dy) natural superlattice structure. Acta Mater. 2012, 60, 3380–3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pathak, A.; Mehta, K.K.; Singh, A.K. A first principles calculation of Ni-16Cr and Ni-16Mo alloys. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2017, 15, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, S.; Fu, H.; Lin, J.; Guo, G.; Lei, Y.; Wang, R. The stability, mechanical properties, electronic structures and thermodynamic properties of (Ti, Nb)C compounds by first-principles calculations. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ozisik, H.; Deligoz, E.; Colakoglu, K.; Surucu, G. Structural and mechanical stability of rare-earth diborides. Chin. Phys. B 2013, 22, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Y.; Xing, J.; Fu, H.; Li, Y.; Sun, L.; Lv, Z. Structural stability, mechanical properties, electronic structures and thermal properties of XS (X = Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) binary compounds. Phys. Lett. A 2017, 381, 2648–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Özışık, H.; Çiftci, Y.Ö.; Çolakoğlu, K.; Deligöz, E. The structural, elastic and vibrational properties of the DyX (X = P, As) compounds. Phys. Scr. 2011, 83, 035601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, E.; Lee, B.J. Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potential for the Fe-Al system. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2010, 22, 175702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yan, P.; Chong, X.; Jiang, Y.; Feng, J. Effects of alloying elements such as Ti, Zr and Hf on the mechanical and thermodynamic properties of Pd-Base superalloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 710, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feng, J.; Xiao, B.; Zhou, R.; Pan, W. Anisotropy in elasticity and thermal conductivity of monazite-type REPO4 (RE = La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Eu and Gd) from first-principles calculations. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 7364–7383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nye, J.F. Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Feng, J.; Zhou, R. Elasticity, electronic properties and hardness of MoC investigated by first principles calculations. Physcia B 2013, 419, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, S.; Liu, Y.; Fu, H.; Guo, X.; Ma, S.; Lin, J.; Guo, G.; Lei, Y.; Wang, R. First Principles Study of Mechanical Properties and Electronic Structures of Vanadium-Doped TiC and TiN. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018, 20, 1800295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, X.; Niu, H.; Li, D.; Li, Y. Modeling hardness of polycrystalline materials and bulk metallic glasses. Intermetallics 2011, 19, 1275–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Deligoz, E.; Ciftci, Y.O.; Jochym, P.T.; Colakoglu, K. The first principles study on PtC compound. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008, 111, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, C.L.; Lu, W.; He, L.L.; Ye, H.Q. First-principles study of deformation-induced phase transformations in Ti-Al intermetallics. J. Mater. Res. 2009, 24, 1662–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Feng, J.; Xiao, B.; Wan, C.L.; Qu, Z.X.; Huang, Z.C.; Chen, J.C.; Zhou, R.; Pan, W. Electronic structure, mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of Ln2Zr2O7 (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu and Gd) pyrochlore. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 1742–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, L.; Xu, G.; Wang, A.; Wu, X.; Wang, R. First-principles investigations on structure stability, elastic properties, anisotropy and Debye temperature of tetragonal LiFeAs and NaFeAs under pressure. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2017, 104, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The crystal structure of NixBy compounds (red balls represent B atoms, blue balls represent Ni atoms) (a) Ni3B; (b) Ni2B; (c) Ni4B3; (d) NiB.
Figure 1. The crystal structure of NixBy compounds (red balls represent B atoms, blue balls represent Ni atoms) (a) Ni3B; (b) Ni2B; (c) Ni4B3; (d) NiB.
Crystals 08 00451 g001
Figure 2. The surface construction of the Young’s modulus of NixBy compounds (a) Ni3B; (b) Ni2B; (c) Ni4B3; (d) NiB.
Figure 2. The surface construction of the Young’s modulus of NixBy compounds (a) Ni3B; (b) Ni2B; (c) Ni4B3; (d) NiB.
Crystals 08 00451 g002
Figure 3. Planar projections of the Young’s modulus of NixBy compounds (a) (X-Y) planar; (b) (X-Z) planar; (c) (Y-Z) planar.
Figure 3. Planar projections of the Young’s modulus of NixBy compounds (a) (X-Y) planar; (b) (X-Z) planar; (c) (Y-Z) planar.
Crystals 08 00451 g003
Figure 4. The hardness of NixBy compounds.
Figure 4. The hardness of NixBy compounds.
Crystals 08 00451 g004
Figure 5. Total density of states (TDOS) and partial density of states (PDOS) for NixBy compounds. Dashed lines represent the Fermi level: (a) Ni3B; (b) Ni2B; (c) Ni4B3; (d) NiB.
Figure 5. Total density of states (TDOS) and partial density of states (PDOS) for NixBy compounds. Dashed lines represent the Fermi level: (a) Ni3B; (b) Ni2B; (c) Ni4B3; (d) NiB.
Crystals 08 00451 g005
Table 1. The optimized parameters of NixBy compounds.
Table 1. The optimized parameters of NixBy compounds.
CompoundSpace GroupCrystal TypeLattice Constants (Å)Cell Angles (°)Formation
abcαβγEnergy (kJ/mol)
NiFm-3mcubic3.5303.5303.53090.090.090.0
3.520 a3.520 a3.520 a
Ni3BPnmaorthorhombic4.4176.6715.19990.090.090.0−32.819
4.429 b6.659 b5.108 b
Ni2BI4/mcmtetragonal4.9914.2864.99190.090.090.0−35.848
4.991 c4.284 c4.991 c
Ni4B3Pnmaorthorhombic3.0056.60312.01190.090.090.0−36.026
2.981 d6.568 d11.954 d
NiBCmcmorthorhombic2.9912.9827.33890.090.090.0−32.547
2.927 e2.963 e7.394 e
BR-3mrhombohedral4.8994.89912.55190.090.0120.0
4.924 f4.924 f12.609 f
a Ref. Cal. [22]; b Ref. Cal. [23]; c Ref. Cal. [16]; d Ref. Cal. [24]; e Ref. Cal. [17]; f Ref. Cal. [25].
Table 2. The calculated elastic constants (in GPa) of NixBy compounds.
Table 2. The calculated elastic constants (in GPa) of NixBy compounds.
CompoundsElastic Constants
C11C12C13C22C23C33C44C55C66
Ni3B348.6184.1161.7340.8184.4363.4132.696.7112.4
Ni2B405.7207.6165.5408.6167.1416.0102.9102.8138.9
Ni4B3379.3201.1210.2417.4169.2401.5110.8147.8140.5
NiB352.3170.0194.7508.5178.1419.9137.2111.2129.4
Table 3. Bulk modulus (B), Shear modulus (G), Young’s modulus (E), and Poisson’s ratio (υ) of the NixBy compounds.
Table 3. Bulk modulus (B), Shear modulus (G), Young’s modulus (E), and Poisson’s ratio (υ) of the NixBy compounds.
CompoundsBVBRBGVGRGEυB/G
Ni3B234.8234.7234.8103.299.8101.5266.20.3112.313
Ni2B256.7256.4256.6114.9112.7113.8297.50.3072.254
Ni4B3262.1262.1262.1121.0116.5118.8309.20.3082.276
NiB262.9258.4260.7124.7120.9122.8318.50.2962.122
Table 4. The calculated universal anisotropic index (AU), bulk anisotropy (AB and AG), and shear anisotropic factors (A1, A2, A3) of NixBy compounds.
Table 4. The calculated universal anisotropic index (AU), bulk anisotropy (AB and AG), and shear anisotropic factors (A1, A2, A3) of NixBy compounds.
CompoundsAUABAGA1A2A3
Ni3B0.1670.0000.0161.3651.1531.400
Ni2B0.0990.0010.0100.8380.8391.392
Ni4B30.19600.0191.2301.2311.425
NiB0.1740.0090.0151.4330.7770.994
Table 5. Milliken population analysis results of NixBy, the unit of bond length is Å.
Table 5. Milliken population analysis results of NixBy, the unit of bond length is Å.
SpeciesAtomsspdTotal ElectronsCharge
Ni3BB1.122.46 3.58−0.58
Ni0.350.738.729.810.19
Ni2BB1.072.45 3.52−0.52
Ni0.300.728.729.740.26
Ni4B3B1.002.50 3.53−0.53
Ni0.240.638.739.600.40
NiBB0.992.55 3.54−0.54
Ni0.180.558.739.460.54
SpeciesBond L ¯ ( A B ) (Å) n A B ¯ ( e l e c t r o n s )
Ni3BB-Ni2.110.28
Ni-Ni2.56−0.01
Ni2BB-B2.140.65
B-Ni2.140.15
Ni-Ni2.59−0.11
Ni4B3B-B2.330.76
B-Ni2.300.17
Ni-Ni2.93−0.13
NiBB-B1.781.45
B-Ni2.150.28
Ni-Ni2.61−0.14
Table 6. Theoretically calculated thermal properties of the NixBy compounds, including vs, v1, vm, and ΘD.
Table 6. Theoretically calculated thermal properties of the NixBy compounds, including vs, v1, vm, and ΘD.
Compoundsvs/m∙s−1v1/m∙s−1vm/m∙s−1ΘD/K
Ni3B3505.66693.73921.2553.4
Ni2B3663.86939.44095.9600.7
Ni4B33958.17447.84422.9645.1
NiB4052.47532.94524.4681.8

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, K.; Du, D.; Chang, B.; Hong, Y.; Ju, J.; Sun, S.; Fu, H. Mechanical Properties, Electronic Structures, and Debye Temperature of NixBy Compounds Obtained by the First Principles Calculations. Crystals 2018, 8, 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8120451

AMA Style

Wang K, Du D, Chang B, Hong Y, Ju J, Sun S, Fu H. Mechanical Properties, Electronic Structures, and Debye Temperature of NixBy Compounds Obtained by the First Principles Calculations. Crystals. 2018; 8(12):451. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8120451

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Kaiming, Dong Du, Baohua Chang, Yuxiang Hong, Jiang Ju, Shuting Sun, and Hanguang Fu. 2018. "Mechanical Properties, Electronic Structures, and Debye Temperature of NixBy Compounds Obtained by the First Principles Calculations" Crystals 8, no. 12: 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8120451

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop