Next Article in Journal
Organic Conductors
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Carrier Materials in Self-Healing Cement-Based Materials Based on Microbial-Induced Mineralization
Previous Article in Journal
A New Compact Split Ring Resonator Based Double Inverse Epsilon Shaped Metamaterial for Triple Band Satellite and Radar Communication
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties and Disintegration Resistance of Microbially Solidified Granite Residual Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bio-Mediated Method for Immobilizing Copper Tailings Sand Contaminated with Multiple Heavy Metals

1
School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
2
Energy Exploration Center, Geological Exploration Technology Institute of Anhui Province, Hefei 230031, China
3
Anhui Huizi Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhu 241004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2022, 12(4), 522; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040522
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 1 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 8 April 2022

Abstract

:
Microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) is a natural bio-mediated process that has been investigated for soil stabilization and heavy metal immobilization in soil and groundwater. This study analyzed the effect and mechanism of MICP for the solidification/stabilization of tailings sand with multi-heavy metals. When the concentration of cementation solution (CS) is 1.0 mol/L and the optical density(OD600) is 1.6, the unconfined compressive strength of tailings sand treated by MICP is the largest, and the solidification efficiency of heavy metals in tailings sand is also the highest. The macroscopic and microscopic observations reveal that the mechanism of MICP solidification of tailings is bacterial outer oxide, hydroxide, alkaline carbonate, and carbonate precipitation.

1. Introduction

Copper tailings are powdery or sandy solid wastes produced by copper ore beneficiation. According to the analysis report of China’s solid waste treatment industry in 2021, the annual emission of copper tailings slag in China can reach 335 million tons. Immense quantities of tailings accumulate in the form of large hills or water ponds, which may cause severe problems. Sometimes, large tailing dumps are unstable and suffer from slope instability effecting by water content changes, which may cause geo-hazards such as landslides. Furthermore, as reservoirs of heavy metal-containing wastes such as Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, and Cr, copper mine tailings pose significantly substantial risk to the ecosystem and human health due to their toxicity [1,2]. Small particles of tailings may be carried by wind to nearby communities and cause air pollution. Water and soil pollution may occur when rain falls on the tailings and leaches the metals [3]. Therefore, it is of great importance to find low energy consumption, fast, efficient, and environmentally friendly way to manage these tailings and reduce risks.
Microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) has been proven to be economical, effective, and environmentally friendly [4,5,6,7,8]. One of the most widely adopted pathways to achieve MICP is hydrolysis of urea by urease enzyme, which has the advantages of low cost, high efficiency in triggering cementation, controllable reaction process, and straightforward isolation and harvest process [9]. Among them, Sporosarcina pasteurii is the most effective urease-producing bacterial species. The fundamental principle of MICP is that urease-producing bacteria are able to produce urease to decompose urea into ammonium (NH4+) and carbonate (CO32−), then NH4+ releases ammonia (NH3) and increases the pH value of the medium until NH4+/NH3 and HCO3/CO32− reach a balance. After these reactions, the pH is close to 9.3 whereby CaCO3 precipitation occurs via a combination of Ca2+ and CO32− [10]. The precipitated CaCO3 fills the soil pores and cements the soil particles, which improves the soil strength and reduces the permeability. Meanwhile, the heavy metal ions are co-precipitated and immobilized, which can significantly reduce the concentration of exchangeable heavy metal ions.
In the MICP process, by replacing the calcium with other divalent elements, strong absorption of heavy metals on the surface and inside the lattice of calcite occurs [11]. However, more than five million contaminated sites have been reported globally, in particular mine tailing sites, covering 20 million hectares of land, in which the soils are contaminated by the heavy metals, such as Cu, Pb, Cd, As, Cr, Co, Hg, Ni, Zn, and Se, and which have soil concentrations above background values or regulatory levels [12,13,14,15,16,17]. The effect and mechanism of ureolytic-driven MICP for immobilizing multi-heavy-metal contaminated soils has not been explained clearly. This mechanism can be crucial in applications, as polluted soil like tailing sand invariably contains multiple metal elements, which may have a significant impact on the effect of immobilization. The presence of heavy metals in the soil will undoubtedly affect the curing efficiency of microorganisms.
Using MICP (including the ureolytic-driven MICP) method, this study chooses tailings sand polluted by various heavy metals for study, and explores the followings: (1) the unconfirmed compressive strength (UCS) and durability of tailings sand under different concentrations; (2) the removal rate of different ions; and (3) the microstructure of solidified tailings sand by XRD and SEM. The solidification mechanism and the hypothesis of multi-layer precipitation structure by MICP of various heavy metals is proposed for the first time in this study.

2. Materials and Testing Methods

2.1. Bacteria and Chemicals

Sporosarcina pasteurii (S. pasteurii, ATCC 6452), a non-pathogenic bacterium with high urease activity, was used in this study for MICP [18,19]. The bacterial solution was prepared by inoculating bacterial colonies into the NH4-YE solution medium (20 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L (NH4)2SO4, and 0.13 M Tris-base) and was then subjected to shaking incubation at 30 °C for approximately 24 h until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached the designated value. The OD600 value was measured via a UV-Visible spectrometer (Shanghai Analytical Instruments Co Ltd., Shanghai, China). The prepared bacterial solution was then stored at 4 °C. Prior to its use in the experiment, it was firstly re-harvested in fresh growth medium. When bacteria cells reached the exponential growth stage during resuscitation, they were inoculated into the solution for the formal test. NH4-YE medium, CaCl2, and urea solutions were sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min.
The actual number of cells can be converted by Equation (1) [20].
Y = 8.59 × 10 7 Z 1.3627
where Y was cell concentration (cells ML−1) and Z is OD600

2.2. Tailings Sand

Copper mine tailing samples were collected from the Shuimucong tailing pond (117°51′2″ E, 30°55′42″ N), which is located in Tongling city, a typical mining city in Southeast China. According to the test results, the average particle size (D50) was 0.28 mm, the nonuniformity coefficient (Cu) was 4.62, and the curvature coefficient (CC) was 1.58. The tailings were medium-fine sand with poor grading and uniform distribution. The natural moisture content was 9.46%, while the loose bulk density was 1.32 g/cm3, and the specific gravity was 2.86. Some physicochemical properties and the background levels of toxic metals in the soil are shown in Table 1.
The XRF results showed that the tailings contained more Al and Ca compounds. The results of the electron microprobe show that it contains dolomite, potassium feldspar, plagioclase, muscovite, clinopyroxene, garnet, and pyrite. The heavy metal elements in the tailings sand were determined by the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), and the calcium carbonate content was measured according to the excessive acid dissolution method (other carbonates are converted to calcium carbonate). The results showed that Cu, Zn, Mn, and Pb significantly exceeded the standard (GB36600-2018). As shown in Table 1 by X-ray fluorescence spectrosecopy (XRF) technique to determine the chemical oxides in the soil are mainly silica, aluminum oxide, calcium oxide, iron trioxide, etc. The results of the electron microprobe show that it contains dolomite, potassium feldspar, plagioclase, muscovite, clinopyroxene, dolomite, garnet, and pyrite. The heavy metal elements in the tailings sand were determined by the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), and the calcium carbonate content was measured according to the excessive acid dissolution method (other carbonates are converted to calcium carbonate). The results showed that Cu, Zn, Mn, and Pb significantly exceeded the standard (GB36600-2018).

2.3. Sample Concentration

The objective of the mine tailing immobilization test was to determine the heavy metal immobilization efficiency via MICP at different initial bacterial concentrations and calcium sources. Three experimental settings were designed to examine the effects of calcium source and initial bacteria concentration on Cu, Zn, Mn, and Pb the immobilization efficiency via MICP. The test scheme and sample label is shown in Table 2. The concentration of bacteria was chosen as OD600 = 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6, and the concentration of the cementation solution (CS) was 0.5 (Group A), 1.0 (Group B) and 1.5 (Group C) mol/L, respectively. The step-by-step grouting method was used, and the bacterial liquid or cementitious liquid was slowly injected into the sample by a peristaltic pump eight times (Figure 1). The steps of injections are as follows:(a) 50 mL bacterial suspension was injected from the top to bottom with an inflow rate of about 2 mL/min; (b) 5 mL fixation solution was flushed with the same inflow rate as the bacterial suspension; and (c) 400 mL CS was injected from the top to bottom with an inflow rate of about 0.2 mL/min.

2.4. Methods

(1)
UCS test
In accordance with the standard test method for UCS of the immobilization mine tailings (ASTM D2166/D2166M-16 2016), the as-prepared specimen was assembled in a strain-controlled YHS-2 UCS testing apparatus. The UCS test was then performed at a vertical strain rate of 1%/min. The stress and strain of the specimen were recorded at intervals of 5 s until the specimen failed.
(2)
Leaching experiment of simulated atmospheric rainfall
To measure the immobilization rate of different ions in tailings, this study verified the heavy metal leaching of samples under atmospheric rainfall. A set of self-made devices was used to simulate the rainfall leaching test [21]. The leachates were collected, and the heavy metal content was measured by atomic absorption spectrometry. Then the removal rate of heavy metal can be calculated by Equation (2).
R e m o v a l   r a t e = 1 C m C 0
where Cm is the leaching concentration of heavy metals after solidification and C0 is the leaching concentration of heavy metals in the unsolidified sample.
(3)
XRD and SEM analysis
The control and treated soil samples were analyzed by XRD (Hefei, China) and SEM (Hefei, China) to confirm metal bioimmobilization. XRD patterns were obtained using a Rigaku D/Max-2005 V diffractometer with Cu-Kα scanning from 5 to 80°2θ. After natural drying, the samples were crushed and ground using a mortar and pestle before being mounted on a glass filter using a tubular aerosol suspension chamber. The components in the samples were identified by comparing them with standards established by the International Center for Diffraction Data.

3. Results

3.1. Results and Analysis of Unconfined Test

3.1.1. Strength

It can be seen from Figure 2a that the tailings solidified by all concentrations of bacteria and CS exhibited unconfined compressive strength enhancement. The UCS of all groups was improved in different rate with the increasing of bacterial concentration and CS. With the increase in bacterial concentration, the curing effect of each group was improved, especially in group B, where the UCS was 778 kPa at high bacterial concentration (OD600 = 1.6). The UCS increasing rate of group B was the highest at high bacterial concentration, which was much higher than that of groups A and C at the same bacterial concentration. As the CS content provided by group A was relatively low, increasing the bacterial concentration did not significantly improve the curing effect. The high concentration of CS in group C could inhibit bacteria growth. The increasing rate of UCS of the three groups showed a trend of “fast followed by slow” with the increase of bacterial concentration, which demonstrated that the effect of increasing bacterial concentration on improving the curing effect was significant at low CS concentrations, and gradually decreased at high concentrations. Therefore, the curing effect of group B was better than that of groups A and C at high bacterial concentrations. The unconfined compressive strength of the column sample of biocured tailings obtained in this test is 238 kpa higher than that of the sample made by Oliveira et al. (2021) [22].

3.1.2. Calcium Carbonate Content

The output of the carbonate in tailings after solidification was used to measure the strength effect of solidification.
W ( % ) = M 1 M 2 M 1 × 100 %  
where M 1 and M 2 are the qualities of the sand sample before and after the hydrochloric acid reaction, respectively. The carbonate contents of the tailings sand solidified by different bacterial concentrations and CS are shown in Figure 2b.
As can be seen from Figure 2b, the content of calcium carbonate is positively correlated with the concentration of bacterial. When the bacterial concentration was low (OD600 = 0.8), the calcium carbonate content was 18.48–20.5%, and the calcium carbonate increment was between 2.66% and 4.68%. At high bacterial concentration (OD600 = 1.6), the calcium carbonate content reached 23.16–27.27%, and the increment of calcium carbonate reached 7.34–11.45%. With the increase in bacterial concentration, the calcium carbonate content increased gradually, showing first fast and then slow trend. The calcium carbonate content of three groups indicated that CS concentration 1 M was the optimal concentration for solidifying copper tailings. The produced rate of calcium carbonate in groups A and C was slower than that in group B.

3.2. Leaching Characteristics

The leaching concentration of heavy metals after solidification of tailings sand is an important index for the evaluation of solidification effect. This test compares the variation characteristics of copper, lead, zinc, and manganese in tailings before and after solidification.

3.2.1. Copper

The results in Figure 3a illustrated that the solidification effect of Cu was remarkable, and a higher bacterial concentration may promote Cu precipitation. The highest removal rate of copper ion can reach 99.6%. Specifically, when the bacterial concentration increased from 0.8 to 1.0, the solidification curve had a maximal slope. When the bacterial concentration OD600 was 0.8, the solidification effect of group A (0.5 M) was better than that of group B (1.0 M) and group C (1.5 M). With the increase in bacterial concentration, the leaching concentration of Cu in groups A and B was close to 0 mg/kg, while the effect of group C was higher than 0.5 mg/kg.

3.2.2. Zinc

It can be seen from Figure 3b that the curing efficiency of zinc ions varies greatly under the conditions of different bacterial solution concentrations and different cement solution concentrations. The highest curing efficiency of group A and group C was 29.8% and 40.4%, while that of group B was 95.6%. Previously, the curing efficiency using the same strain was only 68.86% [11].

3.2.3. Manganese

As Figure 3c shows, when the concentration of bacterial solution was 0.8, the curing efficiency of manganese ion in group A was only 14.7%, while that in group C was 81.5%. When the concentration of bacterial solution increased, the solidification efficiency of manganese ion in group B increased the fastest. When the bacterial concentration was relatively high (OD600 > 1.4), the manganese ion solidification effect of all three groups showed good efficacy. The amount of urea and Ca2+ provided by 0.5 mol/L was slight, and the coprecipitation effect was weak, so the curing effect was poor. However, high concentration of 1.5 mol/L CS can inhibit bacteria, and the curing effect is not as effective as 1.0 mol/L.

3.2.4. Lead

The concentration of Pb2+ in group C (1.5 M) was essentially the same as that of the control group at low bacterial concentration (OD600 = 0.8), while the concentration of Pb2+ of group A (0.5 M) and group B (1.0 M) was significantly lower, indicating that Pb had a certain solidification effect when the bacteria concentration was low and the CS concentration was not excessively high. With the increase in the bacterial concentration, the curing effect improved, especially in group C. At high bacterial concentration (OD600 = 1.6), the concentration of Pb2+ of groups A, B, and C was at the same level, indicating that the effect of the Pb2+ concentration was significantly reduced at high bacterial concentrations.
Three possible reasons were deduced. First, when the concentration of the bacteria was low, the CO32− produced by urease decomposing urea was also low. Therefore, the coprecipitation and adsorption effects were weak, making solidification unsatisfactory. When the concentration was high, the reverse applied. Second, when the bacterial concentration was low, the amount of vaterite produced was also lower. A small amount of vaterite cannot adsorb more Mn2+, therefore, increasing the bacterial concentration can increase the production of CaCO3, so the removal rate of Mn2+ obviously improved. Third, the concentration of the CS mainly affects the content of urea and Ca2+.

3.3. Microcosmic Mechanism of Tailings Solidified by MICP

3.3.1. XRD Results

The solidified sample was dried and ground into a powder, and then put into the shl-2 X-ray diffractometer instrument for XRD testing. Three groups of samples were marked as A5, B5 and C5, and the original tailings were denoted as A0.
The wave peaks of A5, B5, and C5 among the original tailings and the solidified tailings are shown in Figure 4, which indicates that new minerals and compounds were formed in the tailings by MICP. Aragonite was found in both A5 and C5, where there was no vaterite in the undisturbed tailings. This proved that vaterite was a newly formed mineral of MICP. Comparing the XRD results of undisturbed tailings with the solidified tailings, it was found that vaterite, zinc carbonate, lead carbonate, manganese dioxide, and basic copper carbonate are newly formed in tailings during the MICP process. These results illustrate that MICP produces calcium carbonate precipitation and precipitates Cu, Zn, Mn, Pb, and other heavy metals.

3.3.2. SEM Results

The SEM results of the A5, B5, and C5 of the tailings after solidification are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5a shows the A5 sample of solidified tailings enlarged by 2000 times. Spear, columnar, and massive minerals adhesions were bonded around the tailings, which could be identified as aragonite and calcite according to the XRD results. Figure 5b illustrates the A5 image sample of solidified tailings enlarged by 5000 times, in which the rod-shaped objects are approximately 2~3 μm in length and 0.5~1.5 μm in diameter at the top, which is similar to the shape of Sarcocystis bassiana. Figure 5c,d represent the B5 sample of solidified tailings enlarged by 3000 and 4000 times, respectively. Like Figure 5a,b, many spherical minerals and a small amount of massive minerals were cemented on the surface of the tailings sand particles. Figure 5e illustrates the A5 sample image of solidified tailings enlarged by 3000 times, in which more spherical and flocculent minerals are stacked and bonded together. Figure 5f clearly illustrates that numerous spherical and massive minerals are cemented with tailings.

4. Discussion

The above test results show that MICP technology can effectively improve the strength and stability of tailings and solidify heavy metal ions in tailings. Combined with the macro and micro test results, the mechanism of strength enhancement of tailings and the biochemical reaction mechanism of heavy metal ions in tailings are analyzed in detail.

4.1. The Mechanism of MICP Improve Strength

The average particle size (D50) of tailings sand is 0.28 mm, which can ensure the unimpeded transmission of microorganisms and nutrients [23,24]. This test adopts the method of injecting bacterial liquid first and then cementing liquid for grouting, with a total of eight times. In the process of MICP reaction, a large amount of CaCO3 (aragonite/vaterite) was newly formed. Vaterite fills the gap of tailing sand and cements the loose tailing sand particles together, so as to improve the strength of tailing sand [4,25,26,27]. The effect improved with increasing bacterial concentration because: (1) the content of CO32− produced by urease increased with increasing bacterial concentration; and (2) when the bacterial concentration was low, there was not enough vaterite to cement the loose tailings. The CS could provide urea and Ca2+, but an excessively high concentration of the CS possibly inhibited the crystal structure of CaCO3, which formed more calcite or aragonite and had side effects.

4.2. The Biochemical Reaction Mechanism of MICP Solidifying Heavy Metal Ions

From XRD and SEM results, it can be concluded that Cu, Zn, Mn, and Pb in the metal tailings were mainly fixed by MICP through coprecipitation and biosorption by bacteria. Based on the research on the solidification of a single heavy metal (Pb) by MICP, Jiang et al., (2019) [17] and Castro-Alonso et al., (2019) [28] explained the solidification mechanism both abiotically and biologically. The abiotic mechanism refers to the chemical reaction between the heavy metals and some elements in the bacterial or cementation solution to form precipitates, while the biological mechanism refers to the formation of cell-centered precipitates by urea hydrolysis. Based on the solidification mechanism, the hypothesis of multi-layer precipitation structure of various heavy metals was postulated and discussed. The bacterial solution was injected when metal tailings were solidified by MICP. As the pH of the bacterial solution was 9, the free Cu2+, Zn2+, Mn2+, and Pb2+ in the tailings could form initial abiotic precipitation such as Cu(OH)2, Zn(OH)2, Mn(OH)2, and Pb(OH)2 under alkaline conditions, which is conducive to acid-base balance. When the cementation solution was added, urea began to hydrolyze, and the initial non-biological precipitation began to transform into biological precipitation, accompanied by other new precipitation. With an increase in the grouting time, Cu(OH)2, Zn (OH)2, Mn (OH)2, and Pb(OH)2 could be transformed into CuCO3, ZnCO3, MnCO3, and PbCO3, respectively. According to the XRD results, Cu2(OH)2CO3 and MnO2 were formed instead of CuCO3 and MnCO3. In accordance with the previous experimental and the XRD results, we deduced that with the increase in bacterial concentration, the main precipitates were:
Cu2(OH)2CO3MnO2 ⇒PbCO3⇒ZnCO3 ⇒CaCO3 (Group A)
Cu2(OH)2CO3 ⇒ MnO2 ⇒ ZnCO3 ⇒ PbCO3 ⇒ CaCO3 (Group B)
MnO2 ⇒ Cu2(OH)2CO3 ⇒ PbCO3 ⇒ ZnCO3 ⇒ CaCO3 (Group C)
As shown in Figure 6, bacteria are negatively charged and can attract positively charged heavy metal ions. The heavy metal ions were precipitated by MICP and wrapped in the outer layer of the bacteria, forming a biological multi-layer precipitation structure. According to the hypothesis diagrams, the innermost two layers were Cu2(OH)2CO3 and MnO2, and the outer two layers were ZnCO3 and PbCO3. Cu2 (OH)2CO3 and MnO2 were formed before the urea hydrolysis, while ZnCO3 and PbCO3 were continuously transformed with the urea hydrolysis. The reason that Cu2(OH)2CO3 and MnO2 did not transform into CuCO3 and MnCO3 could be the envelopment of ZnCO3 and PbCO3 in the outer layer, which prevented the transformation. Generally, CaCO3 was first formed and wrapped in the outer layer of biological precipitation, and the outer layer of CaCO3 could protect the inner layer of heavy metal precipitation from washing or acid dissolution. From the SEM images, we can see that there was considerable calcium carbonate precipitation in the surface layer, and there may be calcium carbonate in the inner layer of multilayer precipitation structure.

5. Conclusions

(1)
The bacterial and CS concentration were the two key factors of MICP. Within a certain range, there was a positive correlation between bacterial concentration and UCS. For CS, an excessively low concentration could not provide enough urea and calcium, while a high concentration could inhibit bacteria activity. Under experimental conditions, the optimal bacterial concentration OD600 was 1.6, and the optimal concentration of cementation solution was 1.0 mol/L. The corresponding compressive strength was 778 kPa;
(2)
The concentrations of Cu2+, Zn2+, Mn2+, and Pb2+ in the solidified tailings decreased during simulated leaching. Both bacterial concentration and cementation solution concentrations could affect the removal rate;
(3)
The micro mechanism of MICP could be explained by abiotic and biological mechanisms. The hypothesis of the multi-layer precipitation structure of various heavy metals was first postulated and discussed in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.K. and F.Z.; methodology, H.L.; software, X.S.; validation, B.K. and L.X.; formal analysis, H.L.; investigation, Z.L.; resources, F.Z.; data curation, Z.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.K.; writing—review and editing, B.K. and F.Z.; visualization, X.S.; supervision, F.Z.; project administration, F.Z.; funding acquisition, F.Z. All authors have readand agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 41877262, 42030710, 42107162), the National Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (grant number: 190885QD168), and the The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (grant number: PA2021 KCPY0055).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41877262, 42030710, 41672306), Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (Grant No. 1908085QD168). The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (grant number: PA2021 KCPY0055).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schmitt, C.J.; Whyte, J.J.; Roberts, A.P.; Annis, M.L.; May, T.W.; Tillitt, D.E. Biomarkers of metals exposure in fish from lead-zinc mining areas of Southeastern Missouri, USA. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2007, 67, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ternjej, I.; Srcek, V.G.; Mihaljevic, Z.; Kopjar, N. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of water and sediment samples from gypsum mining area in channel catfish ovary (CCO) cells. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 98, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Concas, A.; Ardau, C.; Cristini, A.; Zuddas, P.; Cao, G. Mobility of heavy metals from tailings to stream waters in a mining activity contaminated site. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. DeJong, J.T.; Fritzges, M.B.; Nusslein, K. Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2006, 132, 1381–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, L.; Cord-Ruwisch, R.; Shahin, M.A. Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturation. Can. Geotech. J. 2013, 50, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheng, L.; Shahin, M.A.; Mujah, D. Influence of key environmental conditions on microbially induced cementation for soil stabilization. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2017, 143, 04016083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wu, C.Z.; Chu, J. Biogrouting method for stronger bond strength for aggregates. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2020, 146, 06020021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, X.S.; Liu, X.X.; Qiao, L.K.; Zhang, S.; Su, K.W.; Qiu, Z.L.; Li, X.H.; Zhao, Q.C.; Yu, C.H. Study on the spatial distribution of ureolytic microorganisms in farmland soil around tailings with different heavy metal pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 144946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tang, C.S.; Yin, L.Y.; Jiang, N.J.; Zhu, C.; Zeng, H.; Li, H.; Shi, B. Factors affecting the performance of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) treated soil: A review. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 79, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Achal, V.; Pan, X.; Fu, Q.; Zhang, D. Biomineralization based remediation of As(III) contaminated soil by Sporosarcina ginsengisoli. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 201–202, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jalilvand, N.; Akhgar, A.; Alikhani, H.A.; Rahmani, H.A.; Rejali, F. Removal of heavy metals zinc, lead, and cadmium by biomineralization of urease-producing bacteria isolated from iranian mine calcareous soils. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 20, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wuana, R.A.; Okieimen, F.E. Heavy metals in contaminated soils: A review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecol. 2011, 2011, 402647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Xu, D.C.; Zhou, P.; Zhan, J.; Gao, Y.; Dou, C.M.; Sun, Q.Y. Assessment of trace metal bioavailability in garden soils and health risks via consumption of vegetables in the vicinity of Tongling mining area, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 90, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kang, C.H.; Han, S.H.; Shin, Y.J.; Oh, S.J.; So, J.S. Bioremediation of Cd by Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 172, 2907–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. He, Z.; Shentu, J.; Yang, X.; Baligar, V.C.; Zhang, T.; Stoffella, P.J. Heavy metal contamination of soils: Sources, indicators, and assessment. J. Environ. Indic. 2015, 9, 17–18. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, X.; Guo, H.; Cheng, X. Experimental study of the improvement of the properties of the tailing by biomineralization. Ind. Constr. 2016, 46, 94–98, 176. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang, N.J.; Liu, R.; Du, Y.J.; Bi, Y.Z. Microbial induced carbonate precipitation for immobilizing Pb contaminants: Toxic effects on bacterial activity and immobilization efficiency. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 722–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peng, J.; Liu, Z. Influence of temperature on microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation for soil treatment. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218396. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, X.; Miao, L.; Tong, T.; Wang, C. Study of the effect of temperature on microbially induced carbonate precipitation. Acta Geotech. 2019, 14, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramachandran, S.K.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Bang, S.S. Remediation of concrete using microorganisms. ACI Mater.J. 2001, 98, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gollapudi, U.K.; Knutson, C.L.; Bang, S.S.; Islam, M.R. A new method for controlling leaching through permeable channels. Chemosphere 1995, 30, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oliveira, D.D.; Horn, E.J.; Randall, D.G. Copper mine tailings valorization using microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 298, 113440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xiao, P.; Liu, H.L.; Stuedlein, A.W.; Evans, T.M.; Xiao, Y. Effect of relative density and biocementation on cyclic response of calcareous sand. Can. Geotech. J. 2019, 56, 1849–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zamani, A.; Montoya, B.M.; Gabr, M.A. Investigating challenges of in situ delivery of microbialinduced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) in fine-grain sands and silty sand. Can. Geotech. J. 2019, 56, 1889–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, X.; Guo, H.; Cheng, X. Heavy metal immobilisation and particle cementation of tailings by biomineralisation. J. Environ. Geotech. 2018, 5, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cardosoa, R.; Pedreirab, R.; Duartec, S.O.D.; Monteirod, G.A. About calcium carbonate precipitation on sand biocementation. Eng. Geol. 2020, 271, 105612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, B.; Zhu, C.; Tang, C.S.; Xie, Y.H.; Yin, L.Y.; Cheng, Q.; Shi, B. Bio-remediation of desiccation cracking in clayey soils through microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP). Eng. Geol. 2020, 264, 105389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Castro-Alonso, M.J.; Montañez-Hernandez, L.E.; Sanchez-Muñoz, M.A.; Macias Franco, M.R.; Narayanasamy, R.; Balagurusamy, N. Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) and Its Potential in Bioconcrete: Microbiological and Molecular Concepts. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the testing procedure.
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the testing procedure.
Crystals 12 00522 g001
Figure 2. Test results of UCS and CaCO3 concentration. (a) Unconfined Compressive Strength; (b) CaCO3 Concentration.
Figure 2. Test results of UCS and CaCO3 concentration. (a) Unconfined Compressive Strength; (b) CaCO3 Concentration.
Crystals 12 00522 g002
Figure 3. The solidification results of (a) Cu, (b) Zn, (c) Pb, (d) Mn under different bacterial concentration.
Figure 3. The solidification results of (a) Cu, (b) Zn, (c) Pb, (d) Mn under different bacterial concentration.
Crystals 12 00522 g003
Figure 4. XRD results of A0, A5, B5, and C5.
Figure 4. XRD results of A0, A5, B5, and C5.
Crystals 12 00522 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of A5 (a,b), B5 (c,d), and C3 (e,f). (a) Sample A5 magnified 2000 times; (b) Sample A5 magnified 5000 times; (c) Sample B5 magnified 3000 times; (d) Sample B5 magnified 4000 times; (e) Sample C5 magnified 4000 times; and (f) Sample C5 magnified 5000 times.
Figure 5. SEM images of A5 (a,b), B5 (c,d), and C3 (e,f). (a) Sample A5 magnified 2000 times; (b) Sample A5 magnified 5000 times; (c) Sample B5 magnified 3000 times; (d) Sample B5 magnified 4000 times; (e) Sample C5 magnified 4000 times; and (f) Sample C5 magnified 5000 times.
Crystals 12 00522 g005aCrystals 12 00522 g005b
Figure 6. Layered precipitation structure hypothesis diagram. (a) Group A; (b) Group B; and (c) Group C.
Figure 6. Layered precipitation structure hypothesis diagram. (a) Group A; (b) Group B; and (c) Group C.
Crystals 12 00522 g006aCrystals 12 00522 g006b
Table 1. Chemical properties of mine tailing soil.
Table 1. Chemical properties of mine tailing soil.
XRFMass Fraction (%)ElementMass per Kilogram (g)Mass Fraction Ratio (%)
SiO266.82Si311.841657.83
Al2O313.42Al71.084613.18
CaO8.88Ca79.325914.71
Fe2O33.71Fe26.00294.82
K2O3.07K25.48774.73
MgO1.90Mg11.44622.12
Na2O0.90Na6.70781.24
TiO20.62Ti3.74700.69
P2O50.25P1.12650.21
SO30.13S0.54320.10
MnO0.06Mn0.50510.09
ZrO20.05Zr0.43720.08
SrO0.04Sr0.39010.07
Cr2O30.04Cr0.31020.06
Rb2O0.01Rb0.17000.03
ZnO0.01Zn0.06900.01
NiO0.01Ni0.05030.01
Table 2. Test scheme and sample label.
Table 2. Test scheme and sample label.
OD6000.81.01.21.41.6
Concentration of CS
(mol/L)
0.5A1A2A3A4A5
1.0B1B2B3B4B5
1.5C1C2C3C4C5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, B.; Zha, F.; Li, H.; Xu, L.; Sun, X.; Lu, Z. Bio-Mediated Method for Immobilizing Copper Tailings Sand Contaminated with Multiple Heavy Metals. Crystals 2022, 12, 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040522

AMA Style

Kang B, Zha F, Li H, Xu L, Sun X, Lu Z. Bio-Mediated Method for Immobilizing Copper Tailings Sand Contaminated with Multiple Heavy Metals. Crystals. 2022; 12(4):522. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Bo, Fusheng Zha, Hongchang Li, Long Xu, Xianguo Sun, and Zhitang Lu. 2022. "Bio-Mediated Method for Immobilizing Copper Tailings Sand Contaminated with Multiple Heavy Metals" Crystals 12, no. 4: 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop