Next Article in Journal
Performance Evaluation of Sustainable Concrete Comprising Waste Polypropylene Food Tray Fibers and Palm Oil Fuel Ash Exposed to Sulfate and Acid Attacks
Next Article in Special Issue
Humidity Sensing and Photodetection Based on Tin Disulfide Nanosheets
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanism and Effect of the Dilution Gas Flow Rate on Various Fe–Si/SiO2 Soft Magnetic Composites during Fluidised Bed Chemical Vapour Deposition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Photoresponsivity of 2H-MoTe2 by Inserting 1T-MoTe2 Interlayer Contact for Photodetector Applications

1
Department of Electronic Engineering, National Changhua University of Education, No. 2, Shi-Da Road, Changhua City 500, Taiwan
2
Department of Electronic Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, No. 84, Gongzhuan Road, New Taipei City 24301, Taiwan
3
Department of Physics, National Changhua University of Education, No. 2, Shi-Da Road, Changhua City 500, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2021, 11(8), 964; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080964
Submission received: 26 July 2021 / Revised: 14 August 2021 / Accepted: 15 August 2021 / Published: 16 August 2021

Abstract

:
The 2H molybdenum telluride (MoTe2) photodetector structures were made with inserting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer contacts. The optical response properties such as photoconductivity (PC) spectroscopy, illumination intensity dependent photoresponsivity, frequency dependent photocurrent, and time-resolved photoresponse were carried out in this study. In PC spectra, a much higher photoresponsivity of 2H-MoTe2 were observed by inserting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer contact. The frequency dependent photocurrent and time-resolved photoresponse investigations explore the carrier kinetic decay process of MoTe2 with different electrode contact. The Schottky barrier heights (SBH) extracted by thermionic emission theory were also investigated by inserting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer contacts. The results show the potential applicability for photodetection devices based MoTe2 layered transition metal dichalcogenides semiconductors.

1. Introduction

The discovery of single layered graphene opened up new possibilities and research for the characteristics of two-dimensional (2D) materials [1,2]. The 2D transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) are usually in MX2 type where M stands for the transition metal from group IV-VII and X is the chalcogen elements S, Se, and Te [3,4,5]. Compare to graphene, TMDCs can be semiconductors, semi-metals, metals, or even superconductors. Such properties make them highly attractive for lots of studies of novel physical phenomena [6]. TMDCs layered 2D materials with atomic thickness are promising due to their potential use in nanoelectronics and optoelectronics for next generation devices [7,8], such as fin-shaped field effect transistors (FET) [9], FET with sub-10 nm channel length [10], inverter [11], on-chip light emitting diode [12], and Van der Walls heterostructure devices [13]. The most common used TMDCs such as MoS2 and MoSe2 have a band gap of 1.85 [14] and 1.55 [15] eV, respectively. The optical gap can be continuously tuned between the limits of the stoichiometric crystals using alloys with different chalcogen concentration. However, the design of band structure tailoring is an important issue for heterostructure devices. Hence, a material with a band gap close to 1 eV would be valuable in the building block for complex 2D structure system. Two hexagonal (2H) type molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2) is one of the typical 2D TMDCs, which has an indirect bandgap of about 0.9 eV [16] in bulk form and a direct bandgap of 1.1 eV by varying its thickness to monolayer [17]. To date, MoTe2 has received much attention due to its rich crystalline phases and its unusual semiconducting, metallic and superconducting properties behaviors [18,19,20]. MoTe2 also has been demonstrated as a promising material for the applications of nanoelectronic devices [21,22,23]. The preparation and device applications of home/hetero- junction MoTe2 were also investigated [24,25,26].
The contact engineering for 2D materials is a key technology for the applications of electronic devices [27,28]. Electrical contacts with excellent performance are another critical issue for nanoelectronics and optoelectronics to achieve low power consumption, fast photoresponse and effective spin injection [29,30]. The 2D TMDCs are metallic with octahedral (1T) crystal structure and semiconductive with hexagonal (2H) crystal structure. Phase engineering is a promising method to form 1T/2H phase interface in TMDCs material systems [31,32]. Among the many known TMDCs, MoTe2 has shown potential in achieving the 1T/2H hetero interface. Theoretical simulations of the interface geometries have also been studied [33]. The 1T-MoTe2 is a Weyl semimetal with extreme high carrier mobility and 2H phase MoTe2 is semiconductor with direct bandgap [34,35]. Hence, the further exploration of electrical contacts properties in MoTe2 layered materials via phase transformation engineering for device fabrication is not only interesting but also important.
In this work, the photoresponse properties by inserting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer contact of 2H-MoTe2 are investigated. The PC spectra, frequency dependent photocurrent and time-resolved photoresponse investigations explore the carrier kinetic decay process. The Schottky barrier heights (SBH) were extracted by thermionic emission theory and were also investigated by inserting 1T MoTe2 interlayer contacts [36]. The results of electrical and optical characterizations for photodetection devices are determined and possible mechanisms are discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

The MoTe2 single crystals were grown from the composite elements (Mo:99.99% and Te:99.99%) by the chemical-vapor transport method. The chemical transport was achieved with ICl3 as transport agent. Total charge used in growth experiment was about 5 g. Prior to the crystal growth the powdered compounds of the series were prepared from the elements by reaction at 1000 °C for 10 days in evacuated quartz ampoules. The growth temperature was about 900 °C at the high temperature end and 800 °C for the low temperature end with a temperature gradient of about 3 °C/cm, and the growth time was about 20 days. Single layered crystals were formed in silver-colored platelets with a thickness of ~20 um and lateral size of 2 mm × 3 mm. For the preparation of 1T phase MoTe2 interlayer as electrode contact material, the phase transformation from 2H to 1T phase is achieved by annealing process (at 700 °C, 120 min). After the phase transformation process, the 1T- MoTe2 interlayer is connected on 2H-MoTe2.
In PC measurements, the spectra were measured in the range from 0.7 to 1.55 eV by the probe beam with several mW with chopping frequency at ~10 Hz. A data acquisition (DAQ) device with time resolution of 1 ms was used for the time-resolved photoresponse measurement. For frequency-dependent photocurrent measurement, a 2 mW 980 nm laser was used as the excitation illumination. The steady state photocurrent at 0 Hz represented the dc photocurrent. The AC part represents the photocurrent induced in the frequency range of 0.5 to 10 kHz.

3. Results and Discussion

The phase properties of 2H-and 1T-MoTe2 were first characterized by Raman spectra. In Figure 1a, the Raman peaks which are E2g mode for 2H-MoTe2 and Bg mode for 1T-MoTe2, respectively [24]. In order to study the photoresponse properties of 2H-MoTe2 with different electrode contact, we fabricate the MoTe2 photodetector structure by inserting 1T-MoTe2 as interlayer contact. For comparison purposes, a contact using Ag contact on 2H-MoTe2 was also prepared. The schematic diagram of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 structures are shown in Figure 1b.
Figure 2 shows the photocurrent (PC) spectra of 2H-MoTe2 with Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts. We can observe the peak arise from ~0.9 eV which was attributed to the energy gap of 2H-MoTe2. It is also noticed here that the photoresponse of 2H-MoTe2 was enhanced a lot by inserting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contact.
Figure 3 shows the illumination intensity dependent photoresponsivity of using Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2. The responsivity (R) is defined as the photocurrent generated per unit power of the incident illumination. It shows the responsivity decrease gradually with the increase of illumination intensity. The responsivity can be extracted from the experimental results by using the power law function R = P-n [37,38]. The power equation fits to the experimental data with an exponent (n); the exponent implies the mechanism of carrier recombination and trapping states during the photoresponse process. The obtained n is 0.57 for 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of MoTe2 which is correlated with the mechanism including recombination states and carrier–carrier interactions. However, we observe two slopes with Ag contact sample which means two different recombination mechanisms are involved.
The time-resolved photoresponse dynamics of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 were measured by applying ON/OFF light modulation. Figure 4a,b shows the time-resolved photoresponse of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 with the incident light frequencies of 1000 Hz. In time domain, the speed of photoresponse is characterized by the rise time (tr) and the fall time (tf). The rise time and fall time are defined as the time interval for the response rise from 10% to 90%, and decay from 90% to 10% of its maximum photocurrent value, respectively [39]. A single response cycle at 1000 Hz is shown in Figure 4c,d. The rise and fall times for Ag contact on 2H-MoTe2 are 180 and 185 μs, respectively. Using 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contact reveals a faster rise time of 98 μs, as well as a shorter fall time of 99 μs, which indicate the photoresponse speed can be improved by using 1T-MoTe2 as interlayer contact. The slower photoresponse in Ag contact on 2H-MoTe2 might be due to the influence of trap state which deteriorates the carriers’ transfer efficiency.
In the applications of optoelectronic device, the photoconductivity was also investigated for the 2H-MoTe2 using Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts. In order to understand the kinetics of the photoconductivity, the frequency dependence of the photoconductivity Iac/Idc was studied, where Iac is the ac component of the photocurrent, and Idc represents the steady state photocurrent. A laser diode with 980 nm wavelength is used as the illumination source. Figure 5 illustrates the frequency dependent photoconductivity of of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2. It is observed that Iac/Idc of Ag contact on 2H-MoTe2 decreases faster than that of 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contact as frequency increase. The behaviour of frequency dependence PC can be described by the relation [40]:
I ac / I dc = k 1 × tanh ( 1 4 f τ 1 ) + k 2 × tanh ( 1 4 f τ 2 )
where k1 and k2 are the amplitude coefficients. t1 and t2 are the carrier time constants of two decay processes. The obtained coefficients were listed in Table 1. These results indicate that the ratio of long-time constant decay process in Ag contact on MoTe2 is larger than short time constant decay process, whereas in using 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contact, the 52% time constant is composed of short time constant decay process. This might attribute to the additional trap state in Ag contact on 2H-MoTe2, which causes a longer time constant decay process.
The electrical resistivity as a function of temperature in the range from 20 to 300 K for both Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 are plotted in Figure 6. The results show the resistivity for both Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 decrease with increasing temperature. It is noticed here that the resistivity can be reduced by using 1T-MoTe2 interlayer as electrode contact. This might be attributed to the better junction characteristic between the 1T metal and 2H semiconductor MoTe2. We further investigate the I-V characteristics of 2H-MoTe2 with Ag and 1T-MoT2 electrodes contact.
The forward I-V characteristics of an ideal Schottky junction can be expressed as [41]
I f = I s exp ( qVL f k B T )
where
I s = AST 2 exp ( q Φ B k B T )
Is is the diode saturation current, A is the Richardson constant, S is the contact area of junction, q is the electron charge, Φ B is the Schottky barrier height, and kB is the Boltzmann constant. As the carrier transport behavior in device is treated as the 2D material, the current I2D can be defined by 2D thermionic emission model [42], which employs the reduced power law T3/2 for a 2D transport channel:
I 2 D = A 2 D * ST 2 / 3 exp [ q k B T ( Φ B V n ) ]
where A*2D is the 2D equivalent Richardson constant, n is the ideality factor, and V is the voltage. To determine the Schottky barrier height, temperature dependent I-V measurements of 2H-MoTe2 with Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts were carried out. To investigate the barrier, it is common to use Arrhenius plot. The ln(I2D/T2/3) against 1000/T for various V in Figure 7a,c. By fitting the data to each V, we obtained the slope with Φ. Then by plotting the slope as a function of V. The Schottky barrier height can be extracted from the y intercept in Figure 7b,d. The Schottky barrier heights of Ag and 1T electrodes are 108.3 and 60.6 meV, respectively, which are shown in Table 2. The results demonstrate that the Schottky barrier height can be reduced by using 1T-MoTe2 interlayer as electrode contact. The 2H-MoTe2 by inserting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer contact show an improvement in device performance compared to the one with Ag/2H contact, which might be due to the reduced contact resistance and smaller barrier height at interface [26]. Moreover, the reduced interface traps also lead to improve the carrier transport process across the interface which further produce better photoresponsivity properties.

4. Conclusions

In this report we have demonstrated that the photoresponse properties of 2H-MoTe2 can be improved by inserting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer contact. From PC spectra, we found that the light sensitive range did not change but the responsivity has been enhanced about 10 times. Furthermore, the illumination intensity dependent photoresponsivity study also confirmed that the responsivity has been enhanced more than one order in the whole intensity range from 1 × 10−5 to 3 × 10−2 W. About the response speed, the time-resolved photoresponse analysis shows that the rise time and fall time decrease from 180 to 98 μs and from 185 to 99 μs, respectively, after inserting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer as contact. The frequency dependence photoconductivity investigation also revealed that short time constant response increases. The ratio was increased from about 40% for Ag electrode (k2 = 0.39, in Table 1) to over 50% (k2 = 0.52, in Table 1) after inserting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer. We also demonstrated that the Schottky barrier heights can be reduced from about 108 to 60 meV. Our result showed that the interesting 1T-MoTe2 interlayer as electrode contact is an easy and effective method to improve the photoresponse properties.

Author Contributions

H.-P.H. and D.-Y.L. conceived and designed the experiments. G.-H.L. and T.-Z.D. prepared the materials and performed the experiments. H.-P.H., D.-Y.L., and Y.-T.S. analyzed data. H.-P.H. and D.-Y.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under project no. MOST. 109-2221-E-018-008.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nair, R.R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A.N.; Novoselov, K.S.; Booth, T.J.; Statuber, T.; Prers, N.M.R.; Geim, A.K. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 2008, 320, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Echtermeyer, T.J.; Britnell, L.; Jasnos, P.K.; Lombardo, A.; Gorbachev, R.V.; Grigorenko, A.N.; Geim, A.K.; Ferrari, A.C.; Novoselov, K.S. Strong plasmonic enhancement of photovoltage in graphene. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Yoffe, A.D. Electronic Properties of Two Dimensional Solids: The Layer Type Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Festkörper Probl. 1973, 13, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yoffe, A.D. Electronic properties of low dimensional solids: The physics and chemistry of layer type transition metal dichalcogenides and their intercalate complexes. Solid State Ion. 1990, 39, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wilson, J.A.; Yoffe, A.D. The transition metal dichalcogenides discussion and interpretation of the observed optical, electrical and structural properties. Adv. Phys. 1969, 18, 193–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ganatra, R.; Zhang, Q. Few-layer MoS2: A promising layered semiconductor. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4074–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, Q.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J.N.; Strano, M.S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotech. 2012, 7, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Radisavljevic, B.; Radenovic, A.; Brivio, J.; Giacometti, V.; Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotech 2011, 6, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lan, Y.W.; Chen, P.C.; Lin, Y.Y.; Li, M.Y.; Li, L.J.; Tu, Y.L.; Yang, F.L.; Chen, M.C.; Li, K.S. Scalable fabrication of a complementary logic inverter based on MoS2 fin-shaped field effect transistors. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019, 4, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nourbakhsh, A.; Zubair, A.; Sajjad, R.N.; Amir Tavakkoli, K.G.; Chen, W.; Fang, S.; Ling, X.; Kong, J.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Kaxiras, E.; et al. MoS2 field-effect transistor with sub-10 nm channel length. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 7798–7806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tosun, M.; Chuang, S.; Fang, H.; Sachid, A.B.; Hettick, M.; Lin, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Javey, A. High-gain inverters based on WSe2 complementary field-effect transistors. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4948–4953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Withers, F.; Del Pozo-Zamudio, O.; Mishchenko, A.; Rooney, A.P.; Gholinia, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Haigh, S.J.; Geim, A.K.; Tartakovskii, A.I.; et al. Light-emitting diodes by band-structure engineering in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, M.Y.; Shi, Y.; Cheng, C.C.; Lu, L.S.; Lin, Y.C.; Tang, H.L. Epitaxial growth of a monolayer WSe2-MoS2 lateral p-n junction with an atomically sharp interface. Science 2015, 349, 524–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Mak, K.F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shen, J.; Heinz, T.F. Atomically thin MoS2: A new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 136805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Chang, T.R.; Zhou, B.; Cui, Y.T.; Yan, H.; Liu, Z.; Schmitt, F.; Lee, J.; Moore, R.; Chen, Y.; et al. Direct observation of the transition from indirect to direct bandgap in atomically thin epitaxial MoSe2. Nat. Nanotech. 2014, 9, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yun, W.S.; Han, S.W.; Hong, S.C.; Kim, I.G.; Lee, J.D. Thickness and strain effects on electronic structures of transition metal dichalcogenides: 2H-MX2 semiconductors (M = Mo, W; X = S, Se, Te). Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 033305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ruppert, C.; Aslan, O.B.; Heinz, T.F. Optical properties and band gap of single- and few-layer MoTe2. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6231–6236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Empante, T.A.; Zhou, Y.; Klee, V.; Nguyen, A.E.; Lu, I.H.; Valentin, M.D.; Naghibi Alvillar, A.A.; Preciado, E.; Berges, A.J.; Merida, C.S.; et al. Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Few-Layer MoTe2 in the 2H, 1T’, and 1T Phases: Tunable Properties of MoTe2 Films. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qi, Y.; Naumov, P.; Ali, M.N.; Rajamathi, C.R.; Schnelle, W.; Barkalov, O.; Hanfland, M.; Wu, S.C.; Shekhar, C.; Sun, Y.; et al. Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candidate MoTe2. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Deng, K.; Wan, G.; Deng, P.; Zhang, K.; Ding, S.; Wang, E.; Yan, M.; Huang, H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Z.; et al. Experimental observation of topological Fermi arcs in type-II Weyl semimetal MoTe2. Nat. Phys. 2016, 12, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Islam, A.; Guo, J.; Feng, P.X.L. Controlling polarity of MoTe2 transistors for monolithic complementary logic via Schottky contact engineering. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 1457–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chang, Y.M.; Yang, S.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Lien, C.H.; Jian, W.B.; Ueno, K.; Suen, Y.W.; Tsukagoshi, K.; Lin, Y.F. Reversible and precisely controllable p/n-type doping of MoTe2 transistors through electrothermal doping. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, Y.F.; Xu, Y.; Wang, S.T.; Li, S.L.; Yamamoto, M.; Aparecido-Ferreira, A.; Li, W.; Sun, H.; Nakaharai, S.; Jian, W.B.; et al. Ambipolar MoTe2 transistors and their applications in logic circuits. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3263–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yoo, Y.; DeGregorio, Z.P.; Su, Y.; Koester, S.J.; Johns, E. In-plane 2H-1T’ MoTe2 homojunctions synthesized by flux-controlled phase engineering. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1605461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, H.; Johns, J.E.; Yoo, Y. Mixed-dimensional in-plane heterostructures from 1D Mo6Te6 and 2D MoTe2 synthesized by Te-flux-controlled chemical vapor deposition. Small 2020, 16, 2002849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, R.; Zhang, H.; Yoo, Y.; Degregorio, Z.P.; Jin, L.; Golani, P.; Azadani, J.G.; Low, T.; Johns, J.E.; Bendersky, L.A.; et al. MoTe2 lateral homojunction field-effect transistors fabricated using flux-controlled phase engineering. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 8035–8046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wang, X.; Gong, Y. Contact engineering for two-dimensional semiconductors. J. Semicond. 2020, 41, 071901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zheng, Y.; Gao, J.; Han, C.; Chen, W. Ohmic Contact Engineering for Two-Dimensional Materials. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2021, 2, 100298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Léonard, F.; Talin, A.A. Electrical contacts to one- and two-dimensional nanomaterials. Nat. Nanotech. 2011, 6, 773–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Allain, A.; Kang, J.; Banerjee, K.; Kis, A. Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1195–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sung, J.H.; Heo, H.; Si, S.; Kim, Y.H.; Noh, H.R.; Song, K.; Kim, J.; Lee, C.S.; Seo, S.Y.; Kim, D.H.; et al. Coplanar semiconductor–metal circuitry defined on few-layer MoTe2 via polymorphic heteroepitaxy. Nat. Nanotech. 2017, 12, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, Y.C.; Dumcenco, D.O.; Huang, Y.S.; Suenage, K. Atomic mechanism of the semiconducting-to-metallic phase transition in single-layered MoS2. Nat. Nanotech. 2014, 9, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, A.; Pan, J.; Dai, X.; Ouyang, F. Electrical contacts of coplanar 2H/1T’ MoTe2 monolayer. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 075104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Keum, D.H.; Cho, S.; Kim, J.H.; Choe, D.H.; Sung, H.J.; Kan, M.; Kang, H.; Hwang, J.Y.; Kim, S.W.; Yang, H.; et al. Bandgap opening in few-layered monoclinic MoTe2. Nat. Phys. 2015, 11, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sankar, R.; Rao, G.N.; Muthuselvam, I.P.; Butler, C.; Kumar, N.; Senthil Murugan, G.; Shekhar, C.; Chang, T.R.; Wen, C.Y.; Chen, C.W.; et al. Polymorphic layered MoTe2 from semiconductor, topological insulator, to Weyl semimetal. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, W.; Liu, Y.; Tang, L.; Jin, Y.; Zhao, T.; Xiu, F. Controllable Schottky Barriers between MoS2 and Permalloy. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Lin, D.Y.; Jheng, J.J.; Ko, T.S.; Hsu, H.P.; Lin, C.F. Doping with Nb enhances the photoresponsivity of WSe2 thin sheets. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 055011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, X.; Liu, B.; Yang, W.; Jia, W.; Li, J.; Jiang, C.; Jiang, X. 3D-branched hierarchical 3C-SiC/ZnO heterostructures for high-performance photodetectors. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 17573–17580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wu, D.; Jiang, Y.; Li, S.; Li, F.; Lan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, C.; Luo, L.; Jie, J. Construction of high-quality CdS:Ga nanoribbon/silicon heterojunctions and their nano-optoelectronic applications. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 405201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ko, T.S.; Huang, C.C.; Lin, D.Y.; Ruan, Y.J.; Huang, Y.S. Electrical and optical properties of Co-doped and undoped MoS2. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 55, 04EP06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bhuiyan, A.S.; Martinez, A.; Esteve, D. A new Richardson plot for non-ideal schottky diodes. Thin Solid Films 1988, 161, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Anwar, A.; Nabet, B.; Culp, J.; Castro, F. Effects of electron confinement on thermionic emission current in a modulation doped heterostructure. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 2663–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Raman spectra of 2H- and 1T-MoTe2. (b) The schematic diagram of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 structures.
Figure 1. (a) Raman spectra of 2H- and 1T-MoTe2. (b) The schematic diagram of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 structures.
Crystals 11 00964 g001
Figure 2. The PC spectra of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 structures at 300 K.
Figure 2. The PC spectra of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 structures at 300 K.
Crystals 11 00964 g002
Figure 3. The photoresponsivity plotted with respect to illumination intensity for 2H-MoTe2 using Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts.
Figure 3. The photoresponsivity plotted with respect to illumination intensity for 2H-MoTe2 using Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts.
Crystals 11 00964 g003
Figure 4. Time-resolved photoresponse of (a) Ag and (b) 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 structures at 1 kHz. The enlarged plots of (c) Ag and (d) 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 structures of one response cycle for calculating the rise and fall times.
Figure 4. Time-resolved photoresponse of (a) Ag and (b) 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 structures at 1 kHz. The enlarged plots of (c) Ag and (d) 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2 structures of one response cycle for calculating the rise and fall times.
Crystals 11 00964 g004
Figure 5. Normalized photoconductivity as a function of the frequency of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2.
Figure 5. Normalized photoconductivity as a function of the frequency of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2.
Crystals 11 00964 g005
Figure 6. The resistance as a function of temperature in the range from 20 to 300 K for Ag and 1T- MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2.
Figure 6. The resistance as a function of temperature in the range from 20 to 300 K for Ag and 1T- MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2.
Crystals 11 00964 g006
Figure 7. The Arrhenius plot. The ln(I2D/T2/3) against 1000/T for various V for (a) Ag and (c) 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2. Extracted of via ΦB the y intercept value of (b) Ag and (d) 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2.
Figure 7. The Arrhenius plot. The ln(I2D/T2/3) against 1000/T for various V for (a) Ag and (c) 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2. Extracted of via ΦB the y intercept value of (b) Ag and (d) 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts of 2H-MoTe2.
Crystals 11 00964 g007
Table 1. The obtained values of coefficients from the least-square fits to Equation (1) for the 2H-MoTe2 using Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts.
Table 1. The obtained values of coefficients from the least-square fits to Equation (1) for the 2H-MoTe2 using Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts.
Contact TypeAg Electrode1T-MoTe2 Interlayer
k10.610.48
k20.390.52
τ17.5 ms3.8 ms
τ2105 us35 us
Table 2. The Schottky barrier heights of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts determined from 2D thermionic emission model.
Table 2. The Schottky barrier heights of Ag and 1T-MoTe2 interlayer electrode contacts determined from 2D thermionic emission model.
Contact TypeWork Function (ΦM)Schottky Barrier Height (ΦB)
Ag4.26 eV108.3 meV
1T-MoTe24.10 eV60.6 meV
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, D.-Y.; Hsu, H.-P.; Liu, G.-H.; Dai, T.-Z.; Shih, Y.-T. Enhanced Photoresponsivity of 2H-MoTe2 by Inserting 1T-MoTe2 Interlayer Contact for Photodetector Applications. Crystals 2021, 11, 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080964

AMA Style

Lin D-Y, Hsu H-P, Liu G-H, Dai T-Z, Shih Y-T. Enhanced Photoresponsivity of 2H-MoTe2 by Inserting 1T-MoTe2 Interlayer Contact for Photodetector Applications. Crystals. 2021; 11(8):964. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080964

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Der-Yuh, Hung-Pin Hsu, Guang-Hsin Liu, Ting-Zhong Dai, and Yu-Tai Shih. 2021. "Enhanced Photoresponsivity of 2H-MoTe2 by Inserting 1T-MoTe2 Interlayer Contact for Photodetector Applications" Crystals 11, no. 8: 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080964

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop