Next Article in Journal
Reversible Water Ad-/Desorption Behavior of a 3D Polycatenation Network, [Zn(bpp)(BDC)]·1.5(H2O), Constructed by 2D Undulated Layered MOF
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Research on Interfacial Bonding Strength between Vertical Cast-In-Situ Joint and Precast Concrete Walls
Previous Article in Journal
Granular Aggregates Based on Finely Dispersed Substandard Raw Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregates in Production of Green Cement-Based Concrete Composites: A Review
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

State-of-the-Art Review of the Applicability and Challenges of Microbial-Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) and Enzyme-Induced Calcite Precipitation (EICP) Techniques for Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Applications

Crystals 2021, 11(4), 370; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11040370
by Abdullah Almajed 1,*, Mohammed Abdul Lateef 2, Arif Ali Baig Moghal 3 and Kehinde Lemboye 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Crystals 2021, 11(4), 370; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11040370
Submission received: 16 February 2021 / Revised: 25 March 2021 / Accepted: 30 March 2021 / Published: 1 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Frontiers in Cementitious and Lime-Based Materials and Composites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached file.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is written nicely. However, the technical and scientific contribution in terms of data analysis is poor and gives the reviewer a lack of the research contribution. The review paper is not only to report what the other scientists have done but to provide new ideas in research after analyzing the mass data. The authors are encouraged to do more work on how to write a scientific review paper based on the published data and papers. More graphical analyses are needed in order to get a quality outcome from the review. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

See attached. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

All the comments have been taken care of. Thanks

Reviewer 2 Report

It looks fine now.

Back to TopTop