Next Article in Journal
Study on Phase Transformation Orientation Relationship of HCP-FCC during Rolling of High Purity Titanium
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Holding Time of Decarbonization Annealing on Recrystallization in Fe-3.2%Si-0.047Nb% Low-Temperature Oriented Silicon Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Single Crystal X-ray, Hirshfeld and DFT Studies of 1,8-Dichloro-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene-11-carboxylic Acid
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Zinc Oxide and Zinc Ferrite from Zinc Hypoxide by Wet Process and Electrochemistry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Synergistic Extraction of Lithium from Spent Lithium Cobalt Oxide Batteries by Molten Salt Electrolysis and Two-Step Precipitation Method

College of Metallurgy and Energy, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2021, 11(10), 1163; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101163
Submission received: 22 August 2021 / Revised: 8 September 2021 / Accepted: 21 September 2021 / Published: 24 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metallurgical Slag)

Abstract

:
With the continuous development of society, the number of spent lithium-ion batteries has also increased, and the recovery of valuable metals such as Ni, Co, and Li has become the main research direction of many scholars. In this paper, the extraction process of lithium that enters the molten salt after LiCoO2 electrolysis is studied. Oxalic acid and phosphate are added to molten salt containing lithium ions to realize the two-part precipitation method to extract lithium. The influence of pH value, temperature, reaction time, and oxalic acid (or phosphate) addition on the process of oxalic acid calcium removal and phosphate lithium precipitation is analyzed. The results show that the calcium removal rate of oxalic acid has reached 99.72% (Initial conditions: PH = 7.0, T = 70 °C, t = 1.5 h, n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1). The precipitation of Li3PO4 obtained in the phosphate extraction experiment of lithium is as high as 88.44% (Initial conditions: PH = 8.0, T = 70 °C, t = 1.5 h, n(actual dosage of Na3PO4):n(theoretical dosage of Na3PO4) = 1.2:1). The obtained lithium phosphate crystals show regular spherical particles, which can be seen by SEM.

1. Introduction

Due to its excellent properties including its high energy density, long cycle life, low self-discharge, and lack of memory effect, lithium-ion batteries are widely used in portable electronic products, hybrid electric vehicles, and large-scale energy storage [1,2,3]. With the increase in the application of lithium batteries, it is estimated that the output value of lithium batteries will be close to 139.36 billion U.S. dollars by 2026 [4]. There are many types of lithium-ion batteries, such as lithium cobalt oxide batteries [5], lithium iron phosphate batteries [6], ternary material lithium batteries [7], etc. Lithium-ion batteries contain more metal elements such as Co, Ni, Mn, Li, Fe, and the most widely used lithium cobalt oxide batteries contain up to 20% and 3% of Co and Li. However, the cobalt and lithium content in most cobalt-containing ores in nature is only 0.01~0.20%. The cost of cobalt smelting is high, and in our country cobalt resources are poor, so the cobalt materials needed for industrial production need to be imported in large quantities [8].
There have always been many problems and difficulties related to the recycling of spent lithium batteries. At this stage, the recycling of resources in spent lithium batteries is not perfect, causing waste of resources and polluting the environment. Compared with natural resources, the grade of lithium in spent lithium batteries is higher than brine and ore, which has a high recovery value [9]. Therefore, while recovering Co, Ni and other metals, the recovery of Li cannot be ignored. The use of molten salt electrolysis to recover valuable metals in the cathode materials of spent lithium batteries can not only recover metals such as Co and Ni, but Li in the cathode materials also enters the molten salt. After many electrolysis experiments, Lithium is enriched in molten salt and then extracted by a wet method. The method of molten salt electrolysis combined with wet process recovery can realize one-step recovery of Co, Ni, and other metals, while simultaneously achieving the enrichment of Li [10,11]. This paper mainly studies the problem of lithium extraction in the process of preparing metallic cobalt by electrolysis of LiCoO2 in molten salt. During the electrolysis process, cobalt is attached to the electrode rod in the form of metal, and lithium enters the molten salt. We employ a two-step precipitation method to recover lithium ions in molten salt. First, oxalic acid is added to the molten salt powder containing lithium ions to remove calcium, and phosphate is added to the obtained upper lithium-containing filtrate. Finally a lithium phosphate precipitate is obtained. We then analyze the factors affecting lithium extraction and optimize the process conditions for lithium extraction.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Two-Electrode Electrolysis Is Used to Achieve the Extraction of Cobalt in LiCoO2

Polished and smooth high-purity graphite sheet (99.99%, 20 mm × 5 mm × 100 mm) is used as the anode. 1.0 g of LiCoO2 powders were pressed into a sheet with a diameter of about 15 mm and a thickness of about 2 mm, which was sintered at 700 °C to prepare a cathode. The whole process is carried out in an argon atmosphere. n(NaCl):n(CaCl2) = 1:1 is weighed 150 g and put it into a corundum crucible. The crucible containing the molten salt is placed in the tubular resistance furnace and heated to 750 °C under the protection of high-purity argon. Then put the two electrodes into the furnace and apply a certain voltage. The cathode is electrolyzed at a constant cell voltage of 1.3 V, 12 h and then taken out, cleaned and dried with ultrasonic waves. Finally, the corresponding phase detection of the cathode product and molten salt is carried out.

2.2. Calcium Removal Experiment by Oxalic Acid Precipitation Method

The raw material used in the experiment is molten salt, which is deoxidized by the above-mentioned 1.3 V, 12 h electrolytic lithium battery cathode material. In order to ensure that the subsequent lithium ion precipitation effect is obvious and reduce the experimental error, the molten salt after six electrolysis experiments is used as the sample to be tested. Blocked molten salt after cooling is placed in a planetary ball mill and ground at a speed of 170 r∙min−1 for 10 h, then the ground powders are placed in a vacuum drying oven and dry at 250 °C for 48 h. 5 g of the dried molten salt powder is weighed, dissolved in 50 mL of deionized water, and then left to stand for a certain period. Then, the supernatant is taken to different beakers. The beakers are placed in a constant temperature water bath at different temperatures (50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, 80 °C, 90 °C) and stir for 200 r∙min−1. Then, the oxalic acid is added to the corresponding beaker with n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = (1.0:1, 1.1:1, 1.2:1, 1.3:1, 1.4:1). After reacting for a certain period of time (0.5~2.5 h), filter, the content of Ca2+ in the filtrate and the amount of calcium oxalate solid precipitation is determined. The content of residual calcium ions in the solution is determined by titration. First, the pH of the solution to be tested is adjusted to no less than 12, and the masking agent triethanolamine is added to mask the metal ions such as Li+ and Fe3+. Then, calcium red indicator is added until the solution becomes wine red, and then EDTA disodium solution is added until the solution changes from wine red to bright blue. Finally, the EDTA disodium titration is recorded [12,13]. The calcium ion content is calculated according to the following Formula (1).
C ( C a 2 + ) = M a × 40.08 × 1000 / V
M—Molar concentration of EDTA standard solution, mol/L; a—Titrate the volume of EDTA standard solution, mL; V—Volume of solution in beaker, mL; 40.08—Relative atomic weight of calcium.
Calculate the precipitation rate of calcium and lithium ions in the solution as shown in Formula (2).
P e = ( C 0 C 1 ) / C 0 × 100 %
Pe—Ion precipitation rate, %; C0—The mass concentration of calcium (or lithium) ions in the solution before treatment, mg/L; C1—The mass concentration of calcium (or lithium) ions in the solution after treatment, mg/L.

2.3. Phosphate Precipitation Method for Lithium Recovery Experiment

The lithium-containing filtrate obtained by removing calcium from oxalic acid under the optimal conditions is placed in a 100 mL beaker, and the beaker is placed in a constant temperature water bath, the molar ratio of n(Na3PO4):n(Li+) (1.0:1, 1.1:1, 1.2:1, 1.3:1, 1.4:1), weigh the corresponding Na3PO4 into the corresponding beaker, then adjust the pH value to 6.0~10 with dilute hydrochloric acid and NaOH, and stirred at a constant speed of 200 r∙min−1 at 50~90 °C, after reacting for 1.5 h, the amount of filtered solid precipitation was measured. The schematic diagram from molten salt electrolysis to two-step lithium extraction is shown in Figure 1.

2.4. Characterization Equipment

The content of residual calcium ions in the solution is determined by titration. Besides, the ion content in the solution before and after oxalic acid (or phosphate) treatment by an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES, Waltham, MA, USA). The phase of the product was analyzed by Noran7 X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku D/MAX2500PC, Tokyo, Japan). The morphology and element distribution of the particle surface of the experimental sample were analyzed by scanning electron microscope-energy spectroscopy (SEM-EDS, JEOL JEM-2800F, Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results

Figure 2 shows the XRD pattern of the electrolysis product and the molten salt after electrolysis. The cathode product of electrolysis at 1.3 V for 12 h is cobalt, which indicates that it is feasible to recover the metal Co in LiCoO2 by molten salt electrolysis. The presence of LiCl in the molten salt indicates that the lithium ions in LiCoO2 have entered the molten salt. Table 1 shows the ICP of a solution prepared by adding water to molten salt powder containing lithium ions. It shows that the solution contains a large amount of calcium ions and a small amount of lithium ions.

3.1. Study on Calcium Removal by Oxalic Acid Precipitation

Calcium removal by oxalic acid precipitation means that calcium metal ions undergo a chemical reaction and precipitate under the action of an oxalic acid precipitant, and the reaction is Formula (3).
H 2 C 2 O 4 + CaCl 2 = CaC 2 O 4 + 2 HCl ( g )
The reaction and precipitation process can be realized under the combined action of factors such as pH value, temperature, time, and reactant concentration.

3.1.1. The Effect of Oxalic Acid Addition on Calcium Precipitation Rate

It can be seen from Figure 3 that when the initial pH value is 7.0, the reaction temperature is 50 °C, and the stirring rate is 200 r∙min−1. As the ratio of n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) increases, the removal rate of Ca2+ gradually increases, n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1, the removal rate of Ca2+ is 93.23%.
During the precipitation reaction, the amount of precipitant added is a very important factor. Increasing the amount of precipitant added can significantly increase the precipitation rate of calcium oxalate. Analysis shows that under the same conditions of Ca2+ concentration, increasing the amount of oxalic acid will increase the amount of C2O42− produced by its ionization, thereby increasing the precipitation. Due to the same ion effect, the increase of the amount of C2O42− is also conducive to the precipitation-dissolution balance of calcium oxalate Move to the left to reduce its solubility. Therefore, as the molar ratio of reactants increases, the precipitation rate of calcium will increase.
According to the relationship between the total concentration of Ca2+, {Ca}T and pH value at different {C2O4}T concentrations [10], when pH < 0.8, as {C2O4}T increases, the {Ca}T in the solution decreases. The pH of the solution in the middle of the experimental reaction and after the reaction was tested, and it was found that the pH was less than 0.5. The experimental results show that as the ratio of n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) increases, the removal rate of calcium ions gradually increases.

3.1.2. The Effect of Reaction Time on Calcium Precipitation Rate

Figure 4 shows that the concentration of residual Ca2+ in the solution gradually decreases with the extension of the reaction time (The initial conditions are PH = 7.0, T = 50 °C, stirring rate = 200 r·min−1, n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1). After 1.5 h, the concentration of Ca2+ in the solution is stable. With the increase of the reaction time, the precipitation reaction tends to be sufficient, and the precipitation of stable crystal forms gradually increases. But when the reaction time is long enough, the reaction reaches an equilibrium state, and if the time is extended, the concentration of Ca2+ in the solution will not change. The process of calcium oxalate precipitation is a process in which calcium oxalate precipitates crystal grains from the calcium-containing solution and grows up. When calcium oxalate particles are formed, some of them will stick together to form stable agglomerates, and some smaller particles will grow on the surface of larger particles, increasing the particle size.

3.1.3. The Effect of Reaction Temperature on Calcium Precipitation Rate

When the pH is 7.0, n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1, the reaction time is 1.5 h, and the stirring rate is 200 r∙min−1, the relationship between the reaction temperature and the calcium precipitation rate is shown in Figure 5. The calcium precipitation rate first increases and then decreases with the increase of the reaction temperature, and reaches the highest when the reaction temperature is 70 °C. As the reaction temperature continues to increase, the precipitation rate will decrease. This is due to the fact that the increase in the reaction temperature increases the solubility of calcium oxalate, resulting in a decrease in the calcium precipitation rate. The formation of HCl in the process of removing calcium from oxalic acid makes the pH value of the solution gradually decrease as the reaction progresses. In acidic solutions, oxalic acid cannot be completely ionized, resulting in the formation of H2C2O4, HC2O4 and C2O42− [14], which in turn reduces the amount of Ca2+ precipitation and increases the remaining Ca2+ in the solution, which ultimately affects the decalcification effect. In addition, the increase in temperature is beneficial to the reaction, which speeds up the reaction rate and speeds up the rate of HCl generation. Since the HCl generated at high temperature is too late to volatilize, it quickly reacts with the generated CaC2O4 to regenerate CaCl2, resulting in a decrease in the efficiency of calcium removal.

3.1.4. The Effect of NaOH on Removing Calcium from Oxalic Acid

By studying the influence of oxalic acid addition, reaction time, and reaction temperature on the calcium precipitation rate, a high calcium removal rate was not obtained and the removal effect was not ideal. Since the formation of the precipitate is affected by the pH of the solution during the reaction, the HCl generated during the decalcification reaction of oxalic acid reduces the pH of the solution during the reaction. To reduce the influence of HCl on calcium removal, the experiment was optimized by adding NaOH to adjust the pH value.
Figure 6 shows that when n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1, the reaction is 1.5 h, the reaction temperature is 70 °C, and the stirring rate is 200 r∙min−1, as NaOH and the theoretically generated HCl in the solution As the molar ratio increases, the removal rate of Ca2+ gradually increases to a certain level and then stabilizes. When the molar ratio of NaOH to the theoretically generated HCl in the solution is 0.7:1, the removal rate of Ca2+ is 99.72%. With the increase of the amount of NaOH added, the pH of the solution increases. As the pH increases, the oxalic acid ionization is complete, and the concentration of C2O42− in the solution increases, resulting in a decrease in the concentration of remaining Ca2+ in the solution and an increase in the removal rate of calcium. From the distribution of Ca2+ in the Ca2+-C2O42−-Cl-H2O system [15], the main forms of calcium in the solution are free Ca2+, Cam(HC2O4)n2mn, and Cam(C2O4)n2m−2n. With the increase of pH value, the ratio of Cam(C2O4)n2m−2 rises rapidly. When pH > 3, the ratio of Cam(C2O4) n2m−2 gradually stabilizes. And when pH > 2.7, Ca2+ in the solution is mainly in the Cam(C2O4) n2m−2n state. Therefore, when NaOH is not added, the solution is in a low pH environment during the reaction process, resulting in freer Ca2+, so the removal rate of calcium ions in a low pH environment is not high; After adding NaOH, the Ca2+ in the solution is mainly in the Cam(C2O4)n2m−2n state, and the calcium removal rate is improved.
Table 2 shows the results of ICP in the remaining solution after removing the calcium oxalate precipitation (under conditions: 200 r∙min−1, 70 °C, 1.5 h, n(H2C2O4): n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1, n(NaOH):n(theoretically generated HCl) = 0.7:1). It demonstrates that after treatment with oxalic acid and NaOH, most of the calcium ions form calcium oxalate precipitates. The calcium ion content in the solution decreased from 21,040.6 mg/L to 58.91 mg/L. As a small part of lithium ions are mixed into the calcium oxalate precipitate, the content of lithium ions is slightly reduced.
Figure 7 shows that the precipitate is a relatively pure crystal of calcium oxalate, and its particles are observed to have an irregular geometric block structure with a size between 0.3 and 2 μm. Figure 7a shows that some smaller particles grow on the surface of larger particles, and agglomerate through the growth of these small particles to form stable agglomerates, thereby increasing the particle size. The analysis of the particles (point A) about 2 μm shows that the atomic percentages of Ca, C, and O are 5.48%, 38.86%, and 55.66%, and the mass percentages are 14.55%, 41.17%, and 44.28%, respectively. In Figure 7c–e are the results of particle surface scanning. The distribution of calcium and oxygen is more uniform, and the distribution of carbon is more concentrated in the upper part.

3.2. Research on the Recovery of Lithium by Phosphate Precipitation Method

The solution after precipitation by calcium oxalate contains lithium ion, and a precipitate is formed by adding Na3PO4 and LiCl to the solution, as shown in reaction (4). In this process, the main influencing factors of the reaction are the pH value of the solution, the reaction temperature and the amount of trisodium phosphate added. By studying the influence of several factors on the lithium precipitation rate, a better lithium precipitation condition is found.
Na 3 PO 4 + 3 LiCl = Li 3 PO 4 + 3 NaCl

3.2.1. The Influence of pH on Lithium Precipitation Rate

Weigh the corresponding Na3PO4 when the molar ratio of the actual amount of Na3PO4 to the theoretical amount is 1:1, and then add it to the beaker containing the lithium-containing solution after decalcification. Carry out the lithium precipitation experiment under the condition of stirring rate of 200 r∙min−1 at room temperature. Figure 8 shows that the lithium precipitation rate increases with the increase of pH. This is due to the fact that under acidic conditions, H+ and PO43− produce HPO42− and H2PO4, and then Li+ and HPO42− and H2PO4 produce Li2HPO4 and LiH2PO4, and Li2HPO4 and LiH2PO4 are more soluble in water and part of Li+ dissolves in solution. In this way, it affects the recovery rate of lithium. When the reaction pH > 8, the reaction reaches equilibrium and the lithium precipitation rate in the solution tends to be stable.

3.2.2. The Influence of Reaction Temperature on Lithium Precipitation Rate

Adjusting the pH value of the solution to 8 can increase the precipitation rate of Li, and inhibit the hydrolysis of trisodium phosphate. When the molar ratio of the actual amount of Na3PO4 to the theoretical amount is 1:1, the effect of the reaction temperature on the lithium precipitation rate is shown in Figure 9. When the reaction temperature is 70 °C, the precipitation rate of Li+ has reached 86.57%. This result shows that the higher the temperature, the more favorable the Na3PO4 precipitation of lithium. Table 3 shows that the Gibbs free energy of the reaction does not change significantly as the temperature increases, so the increase in the amount of lithium-ion precipitation is attributed to molecules obtain higher energy as the temperature increases, and the frequency of intermolecular collisions increases. The collisions cause more activated molecules to participate in the reaction and accelerate the reaction rate, promoting the progress of the reaction. As the reaction temperature continues to increase, the amount of lithium precipitation tends to balance.

3.2.3. The Effect of Trisodium Phosphate Addition on Lithium Precipitation Rate

According to formula (4), the increase of the PO43− concentration in the solution facilitates the reaction to increase the production of Li3PO4. Figure 10 shows that the precipitation rate of lithium ions increases significantly with the increase in the molar ratio of the actual dosage of Na3PO4 to the theoretical dosage under the conditions of pH = 8.0, 70 °C and stirring rate 200 r∙min−1. When the actual dosage of Na3PO4 to the theoretical dosage ratio exceeds 1.2, the lithium-ion precipitation rate is basically unchanged. Under the same lithium-ion concentration condition, increasing the amount of trisodium phosphate will result in the increase of PO43− produced by its ionization, and the more precipitation will be produced.
Table 4 shows the results of ICP in the remaining solution after removing the precipitate (under conditions: 200 r∙min−1, 70 °C, 1.5 h, PH = 8, n(actual dosage of Na3PO4):n(theoretical dosage of Na3PO4) = 1.2:1). It can be seen from Table 4 that the content of lithium ions in the solution is greatly reduced to 30.337 mg/L. A small amount of lithium ions remain in the solution, and the remaining lithium ions and phosphate form a lithium phosphate precipitate.
Figure 11 is the characterization of lithium phosphate precipitation. It can be seen that the precipitate is a relatively pure lithium phosphate crystal. The obtained lithium phosphate is relatively regular spherical particles, the diameter of the large particles is about 4 μm, and the diameter of the small particles is about 0.7 μm. Figure 11a shows that some smaller lithium phosphate particles grow on the surface of the larger lithium phosphate particles. The growth and agglomeration of small particles increase the size of lithium phosphate particles. The atomic percentages of P and O in the large particles (point A) are 20.79% and 79.21%, respectively, and the mass percentages are 33.69% and 66.31%, respectively. Figure 11c,d show the distribution of elements. The results show that the distribution of phosphorus and oxygen is relatively uniform. Since the corresponding energy in the X-ray spectrum of Li is too small, it cannot be detected by EDS.

4. Conclusions

Two-step precipitation and extraction of lithium from the molten salt after electrolysis of LiCoO2 were carried out, and the influence of factors such as pH, temperature, time, and reactant concentration on the precipitation reaction in the process of removing calcium from oxalic acid was obtained. And in the process of phosphate lithium precipitation, the pH value, temperature, and the addition amount of trisodium phosphate affect the lithium precipitation rate. At the same time, the two-step precipitation product was characterized, and the following conclusions were drawn:
(1)
When oxalic acid precipitates and removes calcium ions in the solution, the stirring rate is 200 r∙min−1, the pH is 7.0, the reaction temperature is 50 °C, and the concentration ratio of calcium oxalate to calcium ions in the solution is changed n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+); when the ratio increases from 1.0 to 1.1, the removal rate of calcium increases, and when it is greater than 1.1, the precipitation rate tends to balance; when the pH is 7.0, the reaction temperature is 50 °C, and n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1, the calcium oxalate precipitation reaction increases significantly with time when it is less than 1.5 h, and tends to balance after more than 1.5 h; When the pH is 7.0, n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1, and the reaction time is 1.5 h, as the reaction temperature increases, the precipitation rate of calcium oxalate increases and then decreases, reaching a peak at 70 °C; by adjusting the pH value of the solution, under the conditions of n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1, the reaction time is 1.5 h, the reaction temperature is 70, and the molar ratio of NaOH to theoretically generated HCl is 0.7:1, the calcium removal rate of oxalic acid reaches 99.72%. Calcium oxalate particles are irregular geometric block structure, the size is between 0.3~2 μm.
(2)
During the phosphate precipitation process, under the condition of a stirring rate of 200 r∙min−1, the precipitation of lithium phosphate increases with the increase of the pH value of the solution. When the reaction pH > 8, the precipitation rate tends to balance; When the pH value is 8 and the molar ratio of the actual amount of trisodium phosphate to the theoretical amount is 1.2:1, the precipitation rate of lithium phosphate is proportional to the temperature, and tends to balance after reaching 70 °C; The reaction reached equilibrium. Under the conditions that the reaction time was 1.5 h, the solution pH = 8, the reaction temperature was 70 °C, and the molar ratio of the actual amount of trisodium phosphate to the theoretical amount was 1.2:1, the precipitation rate of lithium reached 88.44%. Lithium phosphate precipitates as relatively pure lithium phosphate crystals, which are relatively regular spherical particles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. (Hui Li); methodology, H.L. (Haotian Li); validation, H.Y.; investigation, J.L.; resources, Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51774143.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science. Foundation of China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Xie, H.; Chen, Y. Direct recovery of LiCoO2 from the recycled lithium-ion batteries via structure restoration. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 845, 156234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, L.; Dunn, J.B.; Zhang, X.X.; Gaines, L.; Chen, R.J.; Wu, F.; Amine, K. Recovery of metals from spent lithium-ion batteries with organic acids as leaching reagents and environmental assessment. J. Power Sources 2013, 233, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, L.; Qu, W.; Zhang, X.; Lu, J.; Chen, R.; Wu, F.; Amine, K. Succinic acid-based leaching system: A sustainable process for recovery of valuable metals from spent li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 282, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, M.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, X.; Shen, C.; Xu, D.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Gionet, P. Closed loop recycling of electric vehicle batteries to enable ultra-high quality cathode powder. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, K.; Zhang, F.-S. Innovative leaching of cobalt and lithium from spent lithium-ion batteries and simultaneous dechlorination of polyvinyl chloride in subcritical water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 316, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yu, C.-J.; Mo, X.-Y.; Kang, C.-R.; Ni, C.; Ding, Y. Progress in synthesis and modification of LiFePO4 cathode material for lithium ion rechargeable batteries. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2011, 3, 468–470. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, Y.; Yang, R.; Miao, J.L.; Zhao, R.R. One-step recycling of trinary cathode materials in lithium ion batteries and the impact on their performance. J. South Chin. Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2021, 53, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  8. Natarajan, S.; Anantharaj, S.; Tayade, R.J.; Bajaj, H.C.; Kundu, S. Recovered spinel MnCo2O4 from spent lithium-ion batteries for enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution in alkaline medium. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 14382–14392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Etacheri, V.; Marom, R.; Elazari, R.; Salitra, G.; Aurbach, D. Challenges in the development of advanced li-ion batteries: A review. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3243–3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Siqi, Z.; Guangming, L.; Wenzhi, H.; Juwen, H.; Haochen, Z. Recovery methods and regulation status of waste lithium-ion batteries in china: A mini review. Waste Manag. Res. 2019, 37, 1142–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, W.; Xu, C.; He, W.; Li, G.; Huang, J. A review on management of spent lithium ion batteries and strategy for resource recycling of all components from them. Waste Manag. Res. 2018, 36, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Deng, C.; Wang, X.J.; Yu, Q. Edta disodium titration method to determine the titration end point of calcium ion content. For. Eng. 2000, 02, 18–53. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, Y.R. The interruption and its elimination of iron ion in edta titration of calcium and magnesium ion. J. Shanghai Inst. Technol. (Nat. Sci.) 2003, 04, 231–233. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, W.; Chen, W.; Liu, H. Hydrometallurgical preparation of lithium carbonate from lithium-rich electrolyte. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 185, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tian, Q.H. Study on Preparation of Cobalt Oxide by Precipitation Thermolysis Process of Oxalic Acid without Ammonia and Recovery Utilization of the Mother Liquor. Ph.D. Thesis, Central South University, Changsha, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of two-step lithium extraction.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of two-step lithium extraction.
Crystals 11 01163 g001
Figure 2. The XRD pattern of the electrolysis product of LiCoO2 in CaCl2–NaCl molten salt at 750 °C and the molten salt near the electrode: (a) molten salt near the cathode after electrolysis; (b) LiCoO2 electrolysis product.
Figure 2. The XRD pattern of the electrolysis product of LiCoO2 in CaCl2–NaCl molten salt at 750 °C and the molten salt near the electrode: (a) molten salt near the cathode after electrolysis; (b) LiCoO2 electrolysis product.
Crystals 11 01163 g002
Figure 3. The influence of n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) on the removal rate of Ca2+.
Figure 3. The influence of n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) on the removal rate of Ca2+.
Crystals 11 01163 g003
Figure 4. The relationship between reaction time and Ca2+ removal rate.
Figure 4. The relationship between reaction time and Ca2+ removal rate.
Crystals 11 01163 g004
Figure 5. The relationship between reaction temperature and Ca2+ removal rate.
Figure 5. The relationship between reaction temperature and Ca2+ removal rate.
Crystals 11 01163 g005
Figure 6. The relationship between the amount of NaOH added and the removal rate of Ca2+.
Figure 6. The relationship between the amount of NaOH added and the removal rate of Ca2+.
Crystals 11 01163 g006
Figure 7. Characterization of the product calcium oxalate: (a) SEM of calcium oxalate, (b) calcium oxalate A point EDS analysis, (c) calcium element distribution in calcium oxalate, (d) oxygen element distribution in calcium oxalate, (e) carbon element distribution in calcium oxalate, and (f) XRD of the final calcium oxalate obtained under corresponding conditions (The conditions are: 200 r∙min−1, 70 °C, 1.5 h, n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1, n(NaOH):n(theoretically generated HCl) = 0.7:1).
Figure 7. Characterization of the product calcium oxalate: (a) SEM of calcium oxalate, (b) calcium oxalate A point EDS analysis, (c) calcium element distribution in calcium oxalate, (d) oxygen element distribution in calcium oxalate, (e) carbon element distribution in calcium oxalate, and (f) XRD of the final calcium oxalate obtained under corresponding conditions (The conditions are: 200 r∙min−1, 70 °C, 1.5 h, n(H2C2O4):n(Ca2+) = 1.2:1, n(NaOH):n(theoretically generated HCl) = 0.7:1).
Crystals 11 01163 g007
Figure 8. The relationship between pH value and Li+ recovery.
Figure 8. The relationship between pH value and Li+ recovery.
Crystals 11 01163 g008
Figure 9. The relationship between reaction temperature and Li+ recovery.
Figure 9. The relationship between reaction temperature and Li+ recovery.
Crystals 11 01163 g009
Figure 10. The influence of the molar ratio of the actual dosage and the theoretical dosage of trisodium phosphate on the recovery rate of Li+.
Figure 10. The influence of the molar ratio of the actual dosage and the theoretical dosage of trisodium phosphate on the recovery rate of Li+.
Crystals 11 01163 g010
Figure 11. Characterization of phosphate precipitated lithium products: (a) electron micrograph of lithium phosphate; (b) EDS analysis of lithium phosphate A point; (c) phosphorus element distribution in lithium phosphate; (d) oxygen element distribution in lithium phosphate; and (e) XRD of the final lithium phosphate obtained under corresponding conditions (The conditions are: 200 r∙min−1, 70 °C, 1.5 h, PH = 8, n(actual dosage of Na3PO4):n(theoretical dosage of Na3PO4) = 1.2:1).
Figure 11. Characterization of phosphate precipitated lithium products: (a) electron micrograph of lithium phosphate; (b) EDS analysis of lithium phosphate A point; (c) phosphorus element distribution in lithium phosphate; (d) oxygen element distribution in lithium phosphate; and (e) XRD of the final lithium phosphate obtained under corresponding conditions (The conditions are: 200 r∙min−1, 70 °C, 1.5 h, PH = 8, n(actual dosage of Na3PO4):n(theoretical dosage of Na3PO4) = 1.2:1).
Crystals 11 01163 g011
Table 1. Analyze the composition of the solution before oxalic acid treatment.
Table 1. Analyze the composition of the solution before oxalic acid treatment.
ElementsCaLi
Content (mg/L)21,040.6277
Table 2. Analyze the composition of the solution after oxalic acid and NaOH treatment.
Table 2. Analyze the composition of the solution after oxalic acid and NaOH treatment.
ElementsCaLi
Content (mg/L)58.91262.43
Table 3. The Gibbs Free Energy Change of the Reaction of Na3PO4 and LiCl at 50–100 °C (by HSC Chemistry 6.0 software (Outokumpu, France)).
Table 3. The Gibbs Free Energy Change of the Reaction of Na3PO4 and LiCl at 50–100 °C (by HSC Chemistry 6.0 software (Outokumpu, France)).
T/°CΔGΘ/kJ
50−177.084
60−176.775
70−176.465
80−176.153
90−175.839
Table 4. Content of solution composition after precipitation of lithium phosphate.
Table 4. Content of solution composition after precipitation of lithium phosphate.
ElementsCaLi
Content (mg/L)58.9130.337
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Li, H.; Liang, J.; Yan, H.; Cai, Z. Study on the Synergistic Extraction of Lithium from Spent Lithium Cobalt Oxide Batteries by Molten Salt Electrolysis and Two-Step Precipitation Method. Crystals 2021, 11, 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101163

AMA Style

Li H, Li H, Liang J, Yan H, Cai Z. Study on the Synergistic Extraction of Lithium from Spent Lithium Cobalt Oxide Batteries by Molten Salt Electrolysis and Two-Step Precipitation Method. Crystals. 2021; 11(10):1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Hui, Haotian Li, Jinglong Liang, Hongyan Yan, and Zongying Cai. 2021. "Study on the Synergistic Extraction of Lithium from Spent Lithium Cobalt Oxide Batteries by Molten Salt Electrolysis and Two-Step Precipitation Method" Crystals 11, no. 10: 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop