Next Article in Journal
CD44: A New Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer?
Next Article in Special Issue
MIF and CD74 as Emerging Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Discovery of Novel Potential Prognostic Markers and Targeted Therapy to Overcome Chemotherapy Resistance in an Advanced-Stage Wilms Tumor
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Vanishing Clinical Value of PD-L1 Status as a Predictive Biomarker in the First-Line Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Coagulation Protease-Driven Cancer Immune Evasion: Potential Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy

Cancers 2024, 16(8), 1568; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081568
by Subhojit Paul 1, Tanmoy Mukherjee 2 and Kaushik Das 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Cancers 2024, 16(8), 1568; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081568
Submission received: 13 March 2024 / Revised: 16 April 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 19 April 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Publishing a review article in this field will of great help for those who want to survey current state of cancer-related researches.

Author Response

Please find the attached word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In their review "Coagulation Protease-Driven Cancer Immune Evasion: 2 Potential Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy", Subhojit Paul et al. describe the complex relationships of coagulation activation under the paraneoplastic influence of malignant processes and the possible influencing factors of checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

The comprehensive manuscript is both precise and exhaustively detailed.

The figures are well illustrated, yet very complex in structure, and the legends are well labeled. 

An extensive literature data search has been carried out and the literature sources used have been carefully selected.

The only point of criticism that can be made at this point is that the actual sections on checkpoint inhibitor-addressed therapy are somewhat brief in the overall work.

Overall, the manuscript is a very comprehensive review that I would like to recommend for publication. 

Author Response

Please find the attached word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In this revision the authors carefully revised the relationships of coagulation protease-mediated activation of PAR (protease activated receptors) and its isoforms, concerning their influence on cancer immune evasion. For the work, they listed and reviewed different approaches concerning the complexity of PARs activation farther of its well-known role in tumor progression. Here they explore the contribution of these systems in conferring cancer immune evasion. The authors highlight findings leading to the understanding of how different coagulation proteases operate mechanisms to promote the immune evasion of certain types of cancers. They also discuss the recent immunotherapy approach offering possibility of “application of combination therapy involving immune checkpoint inhibitors along with other important targets would serve better therapeutic outcomes”. Finally, they claim this “combination therapy may open a new therapeutic window in the treatment of cancer besides conventional therapeutic means”.

In my opinion the study-work was well conducted and accordingly described including appropriate illustrations. Sounds conclusions are then made. So, I find sufficient reasons to be in favor this work be accepted for publication.

 

Author Response

Please find the attached word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop