Next Article in Journal
Blood-Based Biomarker Analysis for Predicting Efficacy of Chemoradiotherapy and Durvalumab in Patients with Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Patients with Very High Risk of Cardiovascular Adverse Events during Carfilzomib Therapy: Prevention and Management of Events in a Single Center Experience
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proteome-Wide Identification of RNA-Dependent Proteins in Lung Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 4
10.3390/cancers15041150
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

RNA-Binding Proteins in Bladder Cancer

by
Yuanhui Gao
†,
Hui Cao
†,
Denggao Huang
,
Linlin Zheng
,
Zhenyu Nie
and
Shufang Zhang
*
Central Laboratory, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou 570208, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1150; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041150
Submission received: 5 January 2023 / Revised: 9 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role and Therapeutic Target Potential of RBPs in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Bladder cancer (BC) is a common malignant tumor of the urinary system. Despite extensive advances in the treatment of BC, it remains one of the most recurring and life-threatening tumors. At present, there have been increasing reports of studies on the presence of aberrant regulation of RBPs in BC. However, the complex regulatory network of these RBPs in BC remains to be fully elaborated. RBPs have a very high potential in tumor prediction and personalized therapy. Moreover, only with a deep understanding of their regulatory mechanisms, expression characteristics, and potential binding sites, among other issues, will it become possible to apply RBPs to clinical applications. This article aims to summarize the research progress of RBPs in BC. It also attempts to encourage clinicians and researchers to devote attention this field of study and provides a reference for researchers who aspire to pursue a career in this area.

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key regulators of transcription and translation, with highly dynamic spatio-temporal regulation. They are usually involved in the regulation of RNA splicing, polyadenylation, and mRNA stability and mediate processes such as mRNA localization and translation, thereby affecting the RNA life cycle and causing the production of abnormal protein phenotypes that lead to tumorigenesis and development. Accumulating evidence supports that RBPs play critical roles in vital life processes, such as bladder cancer initiation, progression, metastasis, and drug resistance. Uncovering the regulatory mechanisms of RBPs in bladder cancer is aimed at addressing the occurrence and progression of bladder cancer and finding new therapies for cancer treatment. This article reviews the effects and mechanisms of several RBPs on bladder cancer and summarizes the different types of RBPs involved in the progression of bladder cancer and the potential molecular mechanisms by which they are regulated, with a view to providing information for basic and clinical researchers.

1. Introduction

Tumor formation in humans is an extremely complex and multi-stage process that typically occurs over years or decades. The histiocytes of normal individuals gradually develop into tumors with malignant phenotypes through evolution, through a process called tumor progression. Tumors can occur in various tissues of the human body, and the incidence increases with age. Only in very rare cases do cancerous cells progress to clinically visible tumor tissue with occupying lesions. Tumor progression is closely related to epigenetics, RNA post-transcriptional modification, protein post-translational modification, and other life processes. Tumors are not only regulated by these life processes but are also affected by normal biochemical reactions, reshaping cellular life activities and ultimately giving cells the ability to proliferate indefinitely.
Bladder cancer is the commonest malignant tumor in the urinary system. According to cancer statistics released in 2023, the estimated incidence of bladder cancer in the United States is 82,290 cases, and the mortality rate is 16,170 cases [1]. The incidence is higher than that in 2022, while the mortality is slightly lower than that in 2022 [2]. According to the report published by China, the incidence of bladder cancer in 2020 was 91,893 cases, with mortality in 42,973 cases [3]. Bladder cancer is a broad concept that encompasses everything from low-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer to high-risk primary invasive bladder cancer. Low- and intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients face high recurrence rates, with 5-year event-free survival rates reaching 43% and 33% [4]. Metastasis of bladder cancer is a catastrophe that 50–70% of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients have to face, and given the extremely high metastasis rate, the 5-year overall survival rate for advanced MIBC is 4.8% [5]. The research on bladder cancer not only requires the development of new biomarkers for diagnosis and molecular targets for personalized therapy but also in-depth studies of its progression, recurrence, metastasis, and other processes.
RBPs play crucial roles in the regulation of cellular life processes, especially RNA splicing, modification, transport, localization, stabilization, degradation, and translation. Certain RBPs are expressed in a variety of cells to maintain essential cellular functions. Altered structure or disturbed expression of RBPs may cause different diseases, and this concept is reflected in tumorigenesis [6]. Given that RBPs can regulate post-transcriptional RNA, they can rapidly and efficiently alter gene expression in response to changes in the microenvironment. A single RBP can bind multiple targets, and different combinations of several RNP interactions contribute to enhanced cellular recognition and responses to stress [7]. In addition, RBP can promote mRNA translation by recruiting specific translation signaling molecules [8]. By contrast, RBPs involved in the RNA-induced silencing complex can inhibit target mRNA translation while inducing its degradation [9,10]. In several cases, two RBPs can compete in binding the same segment of mRNA, e.g., CUGBP2 and human antigen R (HuR) can bind to COX-2 mRNA, and in HCT-116 cell lines treated with radiotherapy, the RBP bound to COX-2 mRNA shifts mainly from HuR to CUGBP2 and inhibits the translation of COX-2 mRNA [11]. Certain RBPs play contrasting roles in a variety of different tumor cells, such as insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 1, also known as IMP1, which promotes colorectal cancer [12] and liver cancer [13] occurrence, progression, and metastasis; however, it can inhibit the proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer [14]. Notably, a high stromal cell IMP1 expression in the colon cancer tumor microenvironment suppresses tumorigenesis, whereas the deletion of stromal IMP1 forms a microenvironment that promotes colon carcinogenesis [15]. However, several RBPs are only expressed in specific tumor cells; PAT1 homolog 2 is highly expressed in renal chromophobe cancer, whereas dihydrouridine synthase 1 like is barely highly expressed in bladder cancer [6].
Given that RBPs control gene expression mainly at the post-transcriptional level, the RRM domain can participate in blocking certain sites by binding RNA through a canonical RRM domain in its cap-binding complex [16,17]. The RRM structural domain of RBP binds to RNA and alters the secondary structure of RNA; thus, RBP influences the entry of mRNA initiation factors into the ribosomal subunit [18], which ultimately regulates the activity of certain kinases in tumors. In addition, RRM plays a crucial role in precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) splicing [19].
RBPs play an important role in biochemical processes, such as tumorigenesis, progression, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance. In particular, RBPs are involved in the development, progression, and metastasis of bladder cancer [20], as well as in predicting survival of bladder cancer patients [21]; however, the role of RBPs in the development and progression of bladder cancer is unclear. We hereby summarize and review several RBPs that play a major role in the development and progression of bladder cancer. This review aims to provide a detailed characterization of the RBPs associated with bladder cancer and focuses on their structure (especially RRM), function, interactions, causative pathogenic effects, and resulting treatment and prognosis. It also attempts to encourage clinicians and researchers to devote themselves to this field of study and provides a reference for researchers who aspire to pursue a career in this area.

2. RNA Binding Motif 3 (RBM3)

RBM3 is a glycine-rich cold shock protein whose expression can be stimulated by hypothermia, ischemia, or hypoxia [22,23,24]. RBM3 has two highly conserved RRMs, namely RNP1 and RNP2, at the N terminus and an arginine-glycine-rich domain (RGG) at the C terminus [16]. The RGG structural domain mainly regulates the process of RNA cleavage and polyadenylate cyclization [25]. The RGG structural domain, especially the part with arginine residues, is essential for mRNA export, because the absence of a single arginine residue in the RGG structural domain can interrupt the shuttling process of RBM3 between the nucleus and cytoplasm [25,26]. RBM3 performs four main functions in tumors.
RBM3 can bind and affect the translation of mRNA. It influences mRNA stability and the translation of COX-2, interleukin (IL)-8, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [27]. In general, RBM3 facilitates the translation of various mRNAs into proteins [26,27,28]. This promotion includes the following mechanisms: (1) binding to the 60S ribosomal subunit in an RNA-independent manner [28]; (2) increased formation of active polyribosomes [27]; (3) dephosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF2α); (4) promotion of eIF4E phosphorylation [28].
Under low-temperature conditions, RBM3 can alter miRNA levels and thus promote protein translation. RBM3 binds to a precursor miRNA and facilitates its processing by the Dicer complex to form a mature double-stranded miRNA [29]. The regulation of miRNAs by RBM3 is two-sided: it can positively regulate most miRNAs, but reducing the level of RBM3 can promote the expression of a small number of temperature-sensitive miRNAs, thereby preventing pathological hyperthermia [30]. These results suggest that RBM3 is essential for the mitotic process of cells.
RBM3 can play a regulatory role in the cell cycle of G2/M transition. In colorectal cancer cells, RBM3 induces stem cell proliferation through a mechanism that increases β-catenin signaling by inhibiting glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta kinase activity [31]. By contrast, knockdown of RBM3 expression in the human HCT116 colon cancer cell line caused increases in caspase-dependent apoptosis, nuclear cyclin B1 expression, and Cdc25c, Chk1, and Chk2 phosphorylation levels, which are a series of alterations suggesting that downregulation of RBM3 will prevent cell mitosis [27]. In vivo, embryonic fibroblasts from RBM3-deficient mice showed a significant increase in the number of cells in the G2 phase [32]. These conclusions can also explain the higher sensitivity of tumors with a high RBM3 expression to chemotherapy than those with low or negative expression [33].
When cells receive various external stimuli, unfolded proteins accumulate in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum and activate the unfolded protein response (UPR) to rescue cells. Sustained and/or intense endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) induces apoptosis [34]. The protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK)-eIF2α-C/EBP-homologous protein (CHOP) signaling pathway plays an important role in UPR-induced apoptosis [35]. Under sustained ERS, RBM3 can inhibit the phosphorylation of PERK and eIF2α, causing a decrease in the expression of CHOP and inhibiting UPR to avoid apoptosis [36]. This condition may be the reason why the UPR does not induce apoptosis despite its low-temperature activation; low-temperature-induced RBM3 may play an important role in this process [37]. Hypothermia can also alleviate ischemia-induced apoptosis by inhibiting the UPR [38].
In bladder cancer, the role of RBM3 is similar to that in other tumors. A clinical retrospective study including 259 bladder cancer patients showed that the low expression of RBM3 was an independent factor for poor prognosis of bladder cancer [39]; this finding is closely related to the progression of bladder cancer and decreased overall survival of patients [40]. A similar study revealed that patients with a high expression of RBM3 were associated not only with a low tumor grade but also with a low risk of lymphovascular invasion (lymph node invasion) [41]. The effect of RBM3 on bladder cancer may depend on several factors: (1) the expression level of RBM3 is closely related to tumor stage; (2) RBM3 silencing can increase the number of G2/M stage cells and eventually lead to apoptosis [33]; (3) RBM3 directly binds to a variety of mRNAs, thus regulating the activity of multiple kinases in tumors [42,43]. For this stage, studies of RBM3 and bladder cancer have relied on the analysis of clinical samples in immunohistochemistry, but more basic mechanistic studies are lacking. In particular, mechanistic studies on how RBM3 limits the development and progression of bladder cancer are limited. Clarifying these issues will not only further elucidate the mechanisms of bladder cancer development but also improve the current status of bladder cancer treatment and provide personalized therapeutic targets. In addition, the function of RBM3 in tumors and the mechanistic pathways it depends on can be elucidated and extended to more tumor treatments.

3. LIN28

LIN28 is a highly conserved RNA-binding protein in eukaryotes [44]. In a variety of mammals, including humans, LIN28 is divided into LIN28A and its homologous molecule, LIN28B [45]. Human LIN28A is encoded by the Lin28a gene, which is located on chromosome 1p36.11 and is mainly expressed in embryonic stem cells and embryonic carcinoma cells [46,47]. LIN28B is encoded by the Lin28b gene on chromosome 6q21 and is mainly expressed in the testis, placenta, and other tissues [45,48]. LIN28A and LIN28B have highly similar protein structures: both have two functional domains, namely a cold shock protein domain (CSD) and a retroviral zinc finger (cys-cys-his-cys, CCHC) domain [46]. After mutation of either domain, the other domain still has the function of binding RNA, suggesting that CSD and CCHC can participate in the RNA binding of LIN28 [49]. LIN28 protein is mainly localized in the cytoplasm [47]. However, it can also be present in RNPs, polyribosomes (polysome), P vesicles, and stress granules [50]. Meanwhile, LIN28B is mainly located in the nucleus, and it may exert its biological function through the cytoplasmic microprocessor [51]. However, the expressions of LIN28A and LIN28B are mutually exclusive, and tumor cells expressing LIN28A do not express LIN28B, and vice versa [51].
The miRNA let-7 family contains 12 miRNA members, which act as tumor suppressors and inhibit the expression of a variety of important oncogenes (including Ras, Myc, and so on) by binding to their 3′ untranslated regions [52,53,54]. This function of let-7 is regulated by the RNA-binding protein LIN28 [55]. Overexpression of LIN28A or LIN28B is associated with a variety of tumors, leading to increased tumor aggressiveness and poorer prognosis [56]. LIN28B has also attracted considerable attention as one of the downstream genes of nuclear factor (NF)-κB [57]. LIN28A and LIN28B can inhibit the expression of oncogenes, such as Ras and Myc, by inhibiting let-7-miRNA [58,59]. MiRNA let-7 acts as the main effector molecule of LIN28A and LIN28B, with which they form multiple feedback loops: (1) LIN28A/B can inhibit the maturation of let-7 through various mechanisms, whereas let-7 can inhibit the translation of LIN28A/B at the post-transcriptional level, reducing the protein expression level [60]; (2) after LIN28A/B inhibits the maturation of let-7, the inhibition of c-Myc by let-7 is relieved, and c-Myc can promote the transcription of LIN28A/B, forming a positive feedback loop [61,62]; (3) NF-κB can induce the expression of LIN28B, and LIN28B inhibits the maturation of let-7, thus releasing the inhibitory effect of let-7 on the expression of IL-6, which can activate the expression of NF-κB, forming a positive feedback loop. Thus, linking inflammation and tumor further reveals the role played by inflammatory factors in the malignant transformation of cells (Figure 1) [63].
In NMIBC, the inhibition of LIN28 significantly increases the expression level of let-7 and simultaneously inhibits the cell viability and migration ability of NMIBC [64]. Moreover, the expression of LIN28 in high-grade bladder transitional carcinoma (TCC) is significantly higher than that in normal bladder tissue and low-grade TCC; LIN28 can promote the progression and differentiation of NMIBC through the Lin28/let-7/c-Myc pathway [65]. LIN28B can also promote the expression of MYC through the LIN28B/let-7a pathway and promote the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of bladder cancer cells [66]. LIN28A inhibits the expression of lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 1 in bladder cancer cells, thereby promoting bladder cancer proliferation, migration, and invasion [67]. In addition, LIN28A/LIN28B can promote bladder cancer proliferation, invasion, and metastasis by activating the transforming growth factor-β/Smad signaling pathway to drive epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [68]. LIN28B is also one of the downstream targets of macroH2A1, a histone variant; knocking down the expression of macroH2A1 can increase the expression of LIN28B. Knocking down the expression of macroH2A1 resulted in increased expression of LIN28B and enhanced tumorigenicity, radioresistance, degeneration of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and increased sphere formation ability of bladder cancer cells [69].
In conclusion, LIN28A and its paralog LIN28B are RBPs closely associated with tumors, and they exert their biological function by inhibiting the biosynthesis of members of the tumor suppressor gene let-7 miRNA family or changing the translation efficiency of the mRNA they bind. In bladder cancer, LIN28AB can promote tumor proliferation, metastasis, and invasion through a let-7-dependent mechanism and is resistant to radiotherapy and ROS. In other tumors, tumor cell lines highly expressing LIN28 exhibited resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs [70]. LIN28AB is a potential tumor therapy target. Inhibition of LIN28AB induced the regression of xenografted human tumors in mice [56]; however, future research needs to determine how LIN28AB/let-7 is precisely regulated.

4. HuR

HuR is an embryonic lethal abnormal vision gene that includes four family members: HuB, HuC, HuD, and HuR. The first three are expressed mainly in neural tissues and germ cells and are associated with neurodevelopment, whereas HuR is commonly expressed in all human cells [71]. The human HuR gene (hHuR) is located on chromosome 19p13.2, which is closely related to chromosomal translocations and tumor carcinogenesis in human tumors [72]. HuR contains three RRMs and a hinge region in which RRM1 and RRM2 bind to adenine- and uracil-rich elements (AU-rich elements, AREs) in the target mRNA. By contrast, RRM3 can bind to the polyadenylate tail of the target mRNA. In normal conditions, AREs can accelerate the poly-A tail of mRNA to undergo deadenylation to destabilize mRNA [73]. Therefore, when HuR protein binds to these AREs, it can inhibit its own deadenylation and help mRNA to be protected from nuclease degradation during mRNA transport from nucleus to cytoplasm, thereby increasing mRNA stability and promoting mRNA translation; thus, HuR plays a role in post-transcriptional regulation [73,74]. The hinge region between RRM2 and RRM3 contains a 52-amino-acid HuR nucleoplasmic shuttling sequence, which is the main motif for post-translational modification of HuR and a key region for nucleoplasmic transport (Figure 2) [75,76].
The nucleoplasmic transport function is essential for HuR to exercise its biological functions. Under physiological conditions, HuR is mainly distributed in the nucleus. When cells are damaged by radiation [77], depleted of nutrients or energy substances [78,79], including by heat shock [80], viral infection [81], and chemotherapeutic drugs [82], or stimulated by cytokines [83], HuR shuttles from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. After activation through phosphorylation [84], methylation [85], and acetylation [86], HuR can shuttle from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, maintain the stability of bound mRNA, and promote mRNA translation [87,88]. Given that HuR can interact with a variety of cytokines that promote tumor progression (such as survivin [89], COX-2 [90], VEGF [91], low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein [92], etc.), mRNAs stably bind and promote its translation, which in turn leads to the abnormal distribution of tumor-promoting factors in the nucleocytoplasm of tumor cells. Therefore, inhibition of the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of HuR may also become a potential tumor therapy.
In bladder cancer tissues, the nuclearly expressed HuR is not significantly correlated with any pathological features. However, the highly expressed HuR in the cytoplasm plays an important role in the proliferation, progression, and survival of bladder cancer cells, and its expression is related to angiogenesis and clinical staging and grading [93,94]; in MIBC cells, the level of cytoplasmic HuR is significantly higher than that in NMIBC cells [95]. By contrast, the inhibition of HuR accumulation in the cytoplasm significantly increases the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs, such as cisplatin and adriamycin, and inhibits the growth of xenografts in mouse bladder tumors [96]. In bladder cancer, HuR overexpression can promote bladder cancer proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and EMT by increasing the stability of polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1) to upregulate its expression [97], whereas destabilization of HuR causes a decrease in PTBP1 and inhibits bladder cancer progression [98]. In bladder cancer, HuR is a long non-coding whose other target RNA is thought to be HOX transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR). HuR can stabilize HOTAIR mRNA, promote bladder cancer proliferation, migration, and invasion, and inhibit apoptosis. Overexpression of HOTAIR can also increase the expression of HuR and promote its accumulation in the cytoplasm, thus enhancing HOTAIR expression and forming a positive HuR-HOTAIR feedback loop [99]. The role of HuR in the development of bladder cancer is largely dependent on the function of the mRNA it binds. The complex and extensive regulatory molecules in tumors endow HuR with a double-edged sword effect. HuR also enhances the stability and promotes the translation of ubiquitin-specific protease 8 by binding to its mRNA, which subsequently promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of SOX2 by acting as an E3 ligase, thereby inhibiting the invasive ability of bladder cancer [100]. HuR also upregulates miR-494 expression by stabilizing and promoting JunB mRNA translation. Up-regulated miR-494 destabilizes c-Myc mRNA and inhibits its translation, ultimately suppressing c-Myc-dependent matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 expression, i.e., inhibiting bladder cancer proliferation and invasion via the HuR/JunB/miR-494/c-Myc/MMP-2 axis [101].
The double-edged sword-like regulation mechanism of HuR on bladder cancer confirms the importance of HuR in bladder cancer. On the one hand, the activity of HuR is determined by its bound target mRNA, and on the other hand, it depends on the subcellular localization of HuR. More research is being focused on HuR as a target for tumor prevention and treatment. Nanocarriers [102] or cholesterol lipid nanocarriers [103] are used to transport siRNA to the tumor site, which allows it to bind to HuR mRNA and inhibit its translation, thereby inhibiting tumor growth. Inhibitors of HuR, such as MS-444 [104] or ChlA-F [100,101], have also been tested for the treatment of tumors. Regardless of the type of targeted therapy strategy, further research is needed on its potential on- and off-target effects. However, at present, significant inhibitory effects have been achieved regarding the malignant phenotype of tumor cells caused by the abnormal expression of HuR. We look forward to more therapeutic strategies targeting HuR in bladder cancer.

5. Heterogeneous Nuclear RNPs (hnRNPs)

HnRNPs act as RBPs by binding to pre-mRNA to form the hnRNP–RNA complex. Subsequently, they become involved in the processes of mRNA splicing, translation, transport, and biodegradation [105]. HnRNPs can be further subdivided into several subgroups, named in order from A to U, with relative molecular weights ranging from 34,000 kD to 120,000 kD [106,107]. HnRNPs have four unique RBDs: RRMs, quasi-RRM, the arginine glycine cluster (RGG box), and the nuclear protein KH structural domain [108,109,110]. Two highly similar RRMs form a βαββαβ structure in eukaryotic cells, and they contain two highly conserved shared RNP sequences [111]. Although these RRMs are highly similar, a significant difference exists in their affinity for RNA binding. In most cases, the RRMs preferentially bind RNA and can recognize longer motifs, whereas quasi-RRMs bind weakly and mainly assist in the binding of proteins to RNA. However, the disruption of RRM interactions or loss of either binding capacity can affect the function of hnRNPs [112]. The RGG region is the main auxiliary region of hnRNPs and mainly mediates the interaction of homologous or heterologous proteins with hnRNPs [110]. The KH domain forms the structure of βααββα, whose function is related to the splicing of target mRNAs [113]. In addition, several hnRNAs have a nucleoplasmic shuttle function, and they can form complexes with pre-mRNAs to assist mRNAs in the nucleoplasmic transport process (Figure 3) [114]. The M9 sequence is a special class of nucleoplasmic shuttle sequence that is distinct from the traditional NLS and is responsible for the bidirectional regulation of the transport of hnRNPs with shuttle function from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [115]. The nucleocytoplasmic shuttling function of hnRNPs relies on the complete M9 sequence. Single-amino-acid site mutations can disrupt normal protein input and output processes [116]. A part of the hnRNP also has several auxiliary sequences, such as Gly- and Pro-rich domains, which mediate protein–protein interactions, subcellular localization, and other functions [106]. Table 1 shows the structural and functional characteristics of the main members of the hnRNP family.
Numerous studies have confirmed that hnRNP family members are highly expressed in bladder cancer tissues or cell lines and involved in regulating the proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and apoptosis of bladder cancer. The high expression of hnRNP A3 was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with bladder cancer [117]. Meanwhile, hnRNP F and hnRNP A2/B1 also have potential as prognostic markers for bladder cancer [118,119]. In addition, studies have shown that hnRNP U has the ability to deplete the sensitivity of bladder uroepithelial cancer cells to cisplatin, and inhibition of hnRNP U may be a potential treatment for cisplatin-resistant bladder cancer [120]. To describe the role of hnRNP family members in bladder cancer in detail, we will discuss and summarize the following aspects.
EMT is an important biological process for epithelial-derived malignant tumor cells to acquire migration and invasion abilities. This process mainly includes epithelial cell markers, such as the decreased expression of E-calmodulin (E-cadherin) and upregulated expression of mesenchymal cell-associated markers (vimentin and N-cadherin) [121]. In bladder cancer, this process is also regulated by hnRNPs. The overexpression of hnRNP L in bladder cancer cell lines will up-regulate the mesenchymal markers vimentin and snail, whereas the expressions of epithelial markers E-cadherin and β-catenin will be downregulated [122]. In bladder cancer tissues, the expression of hnRNP F is also significantly up-regulated, enhances stability, and promotes the translation of Snai1 mRNA, which promotes EMT and is significantly associated with poor prognosis among bladder cancer patients [123].
In addition to regulating EMT, hnRNP family members are involved in other invasion and metastasis mechanisms of bladder cancer. hnRNPA2/B1 can promote lymph node metastasis of bladder cancer in a VEGF-C-independent manner by stably binding to lncRNA-lymph node metastasis-associated transcript 2 and promoting its translation [124]. Moreover, hnRNP A1 promotes bladder cancer invasion by promoting the translation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 through binding to target mRNAs [125].
Most hnRNP family members are overexpressed with enhanced proliferation of tumor cells, including bladder cancer cells. hnRNP F can promote bladder cancer cell proliferation and regulate the cell cycle by promoting the expression of targeting protein for xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 [126]. Furthermore, in bladder cancer, hnRNP F expression is regulated by the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/AKT pathway [127]. Moreover, hnRNP L inhibits apoptosis via suppression of caspase-3, -6, and -9 expression and enhances the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway, leading to proliferation and poor prognosis of bladder cancer [122]. Similarly, hnRNP K is highly expressed in bladder cancer and can promote bladder cancer proliferation and resist apoptosis by regulating the transcription and translation of mRNAs, such as cyclin D1 [128,129]. HnRNP K can also bind to the promoter of SOX2 mRNA and promote its translation, thereby promoting the proliferation and spheroid-forming ability of bladder cancer cells [130].
The increased number of reports on hnRNP family members in bladder cancer indicates a growing awareness of the important role of hnRNPs in the development of bladder cancer. HnRNPs influence bladder cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and metastasis through regulating the mRNA expression of different target genes. Given that members of the hnRNP family are commonly highly expressed in bladder cancer tissue, they can be utilized as a predictor of early-stage tumors. However, although hnRNP family members are expressed at different levels in various tissues, which is necessary for maintaining normal cell renewal [131], and are also highly expressed in stem cells, a number of issues still need to be clarified if they are to be used as therapeutic targets, such as targeted tumor tissue drug delivery, killing effect on normal tissue, and effects on embryos, fetuses, newborns, and children.
Table
Table 1. The hnRNP family presented by their structural and functional characteristics, and its interacting lncRNAs.
Table 1. The hnRNP family presented by their structural and functional characteristics, and its interacting lncRNAs.
hnRNP-Molecular Weight (kDa)RBDBinding SequenceFunctionsReferences
A1342 of RRM,
RGG box,
Gly-enrich domain		UAGGGA/USplicing
Translational regulation
Influence of mRNA stability		[111,116,118]
A2/B136/382 of RRM,
RGG box,
Gly-enrich domain		UUAGGGSplicing
Influence of mRNA stability		[124,125,129]
C1/C241/43RRMPoly USplicing
Translational regulation
Transcriptional regulation		[111,113]
D44~482 of RRMAU-rich domainTranslational regulation
Telomere maintenance		[113]
E393 of KHPoly CSplicing
Translational regulation
Transcriptional regulation
Influence of mRNA stability		[119]
F533 of quasi -RRM
2 of Gly-enrich domain		UUAGGSplicing
Telomere maintenance		[131,132]
K623 of KHPoly CSplicing
Translational regulation
Transcriptional regulation
Influence of mRNA stability		[117,133,134,135]
L684 of RRM,
Gly-enrich domain		CA-repeat sequenceSplicing
Influence of mRNA stability		[127,136]
M773 of RRMPoly G/CSplicing[121]
R313 of RRM,
RGG box		UCUAUCTranslational regulation
Transcriptional regulation		[113]
U120RGG,
Gly-enrich domain		GGACUGCR-RUCGCSplicing
Transcriptional regulation		[115]

6. Others

Although four types of RBPs have been listed for their roles and functions in bladder cancer, more RBPs have been identified and reported in bladder cancer, including insulin-like growth factor messenger RNA binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3), nucleolin (NCL), and quaking (QKI). Moreover, it is reported that Fragile X-related gene 1 (FXR1) was identified as a novel cancer driver gene in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) [132]; circ-SLC38A1 promotes BC cells invasion in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo in mice [133]. Although reports on the mechanism of action of these RBPs in bladder cancer are limited, we believe that they play a role in bladder cancer progression based on their role in other malignancies. Therefore, we also call for more basic and clinical research to focus on these RBPs.

6.1. IGF2BP3

IGF2BP3 is a member of the IGF2BP family, and its members all contain 2 RRM and 4 KH domains in their structure; these 4 KH domains are all binding GGC sequences [134]. Under normal or stress conditions, members of the IGF2BP family can act on target mRNAs in an N6-methyladenosine-dependent manner, promote their stability, and increase their intracellular content, thereby affecting gene expression [135,136]. However, currently, only IGF2BP3 has been reported in bladder cancer. The chromosomal localization of IGF2BP3 is 7p15.3.IGF2BP3, which is a typical multi-domain RNA-binding protein with specificity and diversity in recognizing targets and provides a good paradigm for the multivalent interactions of multi-domain RNA-binding proteins [137].
Compared with IGF2BP3, which has been widely reported in a variety of tumors such as breast, liver, and gastrointestinal tract tumors, pancreatic cancer, and lung cancer [138], knowledge on its role in bladder cancer is limited. Regardless, IGF2BP3 is highly expressed in bladder cancer patients and independently associated with bladder cancer recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality [139]. Knocking down the expression of IGF2BP3 in bladder cancer can increase apoptosis and induce cell cycle arrest, implying that it originally promoted cell proliferation via inhibiting apoptosis and regulating cell cycle [140].

6.2. NCL

NCL is one of the abundant proteins in the nucleolus, and it is widely distributed in the nucleolus, nucleoplasm, cytoplasm, and cell membrane of eukaryotic cells, participating in a variety of biological processes [141]. NCL is mainly distributed in the nucleus, is responsible for the transcription of rDNA, and has various roles in the biogenesis of ribosomes, including RNA polymerase I transcription, pre-rRNA processing, and ribosome assembly [142]. The human NCL gene is a haploid genome located on 2q12-qter, consisting of 14 exons and 13 introns [143]. The N-terminal domain of the NCL is majorly involved in DNA regulation and protein-to-protein reactions, and this region also contains a variety of highly phosphorylated sites that can be involved in cell cycle regulation [143]. The central domain holds four RRMs that bind to and regulate the transcription of specific mRNAs [144]. The C-terminal sequence and arrangement of NCL is not conserved, and its length is variable, usually interspersed with a large number of glycine, arginine, and phenylalanine residues; its main function is to help NCL interact during larger or more complex RNA localization [145]. NCL is highly expressed in a variety of tumors [146]; besides promoting tumor proliferation [147,148,149], it is an important anti-apoptotic protein that maintains tumor cell survival [143,150,151,152,153]. NCL has also been reported to be involved in various processes, such as angiogenesis [154,155,156], infiltration, and metastasis [157,158,159,160] of tumors.
In bladder cancer, increased expression of NCL boosts its aggressiveness and promotes its pulmonary metastasis [161], whereas blocking NCL expression in bladder cancer can inhibit bladder cancer proliferation and invasion [162,163,164]. However, the target mRNAs of NCL in bladder cancer, such as Rho factor [161,162] and/or MMP-2 [163], are also diverse. In addition, NCL has the potential to promote tumor proliferation by promoting the function of epidermal growth factor receptor [164,165]. The role played by NCL in bladder cancer is far less clearly explained than other tumors, and this area needs more research input. Regardless, the treatment targeting NCL has great potential in bladder cancer.

6.3. QKI

QKI protein is a subfamily of the signal transduction and activation of RNA (STAR) family [166]. The STAR protein family plays an important role in embryogenesis, tissue, and organ development [167,168]. The human Qki gene is localized on chromosome 6 and has nine exons, which can produce at least five transcripts by different splicing methods [169]. Three of the main transcripts are the most important, as they are named Qki-6, Qki-6, and QkiI-7 due to their sizes (5, 6, and 7 kb, respectively). The structure of QKI proteins is highly homologous to other members of the STAR family, with similar domains: an RRM (KH domain) flanked by QUA1 and QUA2 domains [169]. The QKI-5 protein is mainly localized in the nucleus, where it can bind to target mRNAs and retain them in the nucleus. This condition is possible because QKI-5 contains a nuclear localization signal peptide at its C-terminus, whereas QKI-6 and QKI-7, which lack this signal peptide, are mainly localized in the cytoplasm and are involved in target mRNA transport and regulate its stability [170]. The reason why QKI proteins can bind to target mRNAs is that these mRNAs have a sequence that can be specifically bound by QKI, namely 5′-A(C/A)UAA-3′; hence, this sequence is also called a quaking response element (QRE) [171]. Bioinformatic analysis showed that QKI can interact with more than 1000 mRNAs with QRE, and most of these are important molecules in cell-directed differentiation, proliferation, metastasis, and apoptosis [171,172]. QKI has a low expression in a variety of malignancies, and overexpression of QKI inhibits the proliferative, invasive, and migratory capacities of these tumors and promotes their apoptosis [173,174,175,176,177]. Thus, QKI may play an important role as an oncogenic factor in the development of malignant tumors.
In bladder cancer, the low expression of QKI is associated with advanced tumor TNM staging and poor overall survival, whereas its overexpression inhibits the ability of bladder cancer cells to grow and invade [178]. The oncogenic mechanism of miRNA-362-5p in bladder cancer is also related to QKI, which can promote the proliferative and invasive effects of bladder cancer via targeting binding and reducing QKI [179]. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are also an important component of the tumor microenvironment, secreting microfibrillar-associated protein 5 (MFAP5), a component of elastic microfibers, which is also an oncogenic factor in a variety of tumors [180], promoting tumor cell proliferation, invasion [181], and recruiting new blood vessels [182]. In bladder cancer, QKI can directly target binding to MFAP5 in CAFs and downregulate its expression, thus limiting tumorigenesis and progression [183]. The expression level of QKI in malignant tumors can be used as an important indicator to predict the occurrence and development of cancer, and it is expected to become a new target for tumor therapy, including that of bladder cancer. However, how to apply it effectively and precisely in clinical diagnosis and treatment needs further research. In particular, the functional differences between the subtypes of QKI in tumorigenesis development are rarely reported.

7. Discussion

In summary, a considerable number of RBPs have been revealed in bladder cancer. However, the complex regulatory network of these RBPs in bladder cancer remains to be fully elaborated. Moreover, numerous RBPs have been widely reported in other tumors without having been reported in bladder cancer. Examples include the Musashi protein family [184,185], Wilms Tumor 1 [186], and zinc finger protein homolog 36 family [187,188]. Although several RBPs have been reported in bladder cancer, a significant gap exists in the exploration of their mechanisms or the breadth of coverage of family members compared with their coverage in other tumors. Each of the three members of the IGF2BP family has been widely and intensively reported in acute leukemia [189], lung and esophageal cancer, and breast and gynecologic cancers [135]. However, in bladder cancer, as the only reported IGF2BP3, its molecular mechanism in regulating bladder cancer is still not elucidated. The emergence of new technologies promises to solve this problem, and CRIPR-Cas9 technology has been given high hopes to discover more RBPs. Several scholars have used this method to find new RBPs [190,191,192]. As the technology improves and becomes more widespread, CRISPR-Cas9 technology is no longer just a “finder” to discover more RBPs but a “detective” that is expected to reveal more of its functions. CRISPR-Cas9 revealed a novel function of RBP RBM39 as an RNA splicing factor [192].
Various RBPs promote bladder cancer progression by promoting bladder cancer proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis or activating EMT in bladder cancer, but there are still some RBPs that can inhibit clinical progression of bladder cancer by cell cycle blockade or modulating cell proliferation and invasion (Figure 4). The complex regulatory mechanism of RBPs makes research in this field challenging. This complex mechanism is multi-layered, and one RBP can have both multiple target mRNAs and multiple different modalities of regulation. The QKI protein functions mainly through the following four mechanisms: (1) synergizing [193,194] or competing [193,195] with miRNAs to exert regulatory effects; (2) the splicing factor QKI can regulate the expression of downstream targets via selective splicing and participate in several biological processes such as cell proliferation [196,197]; (3) inducing cell cycle arrest and inhibiting cell proliferation [166,173,198]; (4) mediating EMT and participating in the process of tumor cell proliferation and metastasis [199]. Whether these effects are features shared by QKI in all tumor cells or are influenced by tumor heterogeneity and whether they have different effects on various tumor cells remain unknown. Another key point is that numerous RBPs do not rely on classical RBDs for binding to target RNAs [200]. As a result, the bioinformatics prediction of RBP–RNA interactions is challenging [201]. As the field of RBPs in bladder cancer has been relatively slow to develop, the answers to these questions for bladder cancer are still unknown.
Many elements in oncology require study in terms of the their potential as a tumor marker or as a target for personalized therapy and other clinical issues. The study of RBPs is no exception. The potential of RBPs as biomarkers to assess patient prognosis or treatment response in different tumor contexts has been extensively explored [73,202,203,204,205]. Studies have also shown that several small-molecule inhibitors can selectively antagonize RBPs or RBP–RNA interaction in vitro, thereby exerting good anticancer effects [102,206,207]. These findings point to the same concept: RBPs have a very high potential in tumor prediction and personalized therapy. However, only with a deep understanding of their regulatory mechanisms, expression characteristics, and potential binding sites, among other issues, will it become possible to apply RBPs to clinical applications.

8. Conclusions

In conclusion, this article reviewed the effects and mechanisms of RBPs in bladder cancer. Several characteristics of RBPs that have been reported in bladder cancer are summarized. Thoughts on future research directions and problems faced in this field have been put forward. Hopefully, more researchers will be encouraged to devote attention to this field, and more bladder cancer patients will benefit from the development of RBP research.

Author Contributions

Y.G., H.C. and S.Z. conceived and designed the framework of the study. D.H., L.Z. and Z.N. collected and reviewed the data. Y.G. and H.C. wrote the manuscript. S.Z. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by science and technology project of Hainan province (ZDYF2022SHFZ296, ZDYF2021SHFZ249 and 821RC727), the National Science Foundation of China (82160531) and the health department of Hainan province (22A200308, 22A200305 and 19A200184).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

References

  1. Siegel, R.; Miller, K.; Wagle, N.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2023, 73, 17–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siegel, R.; Miller, K.; Fuchs, H.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xia, C.; Dong, X.; Li, H.; Cao, M.; Sun, D.; He, S.; Yang, F.; Yan, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, N.; et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: Profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin. Med. J. 2022, 135, 584–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ritch, C.; Velasquez, M.; Kwon, D.; Becerra, M.; Soodana-Prakash, N.; Atluri, V.; Almengo, K.; Alameddine, M.; Kineish, O.; Kava, B.; et al. Use and Validation of the AUA/SUO Risk Grouping for Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Contemporary Cohort. J. Urol. 2020, 203, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alfred Witjes, J.; Lebret, T.; Compérat, E.; Cowan, N.; De Santis, M.; Bruins, H.; Hernández, V.; Espinós, E.; Dunn, J.; Rouanne, M.; et al. Updated 2016 EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2017, 71, 462–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, Z.; Li, B.; Luo, Y.; Lin, Q.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Yang, J.; Qu, L. Comprehensive Genomic Characterization of RNA-Binding Proteins across Human Cancers. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Smith, C.; Valcárcel, J. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing: The logic of combinatorial control. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Michlewski, G.; Sanford, J.; Cáceres, J. The splicing factor SF2/ASF regulates translation initiation by enhancing phosphorylation of 4E-BP1. Mol. Cell 2008, 30, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fabian, M.; Sonenberg, N.; Filipowicz, W. Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79, 351–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, H.; Kuwano, Y.; Srikantan, S.; Lee, E.; Martindale, J.; Gorospe, M. HuR recruits let-7/RISC to repress c-Myc expression. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 1743–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sureban, S.; Murmu, N.; Rodriguez, P.; May, R.; Maheshwari, R.; Dieckgraefe, B.; Houchen, C.; Anant, S. Functional antagonism between RNA binding proteins HuR and CUGBP2 determines the fate of COX-2 mRNA translation. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hamilton, K.; Noubissi, F.; Katti, P.; Hahn, C.; Davey, S.; Lundsmith, E.; Klein-Szanto, A.; Rhim, A.; Spiegelman, V.; Rustgi, A. IMP1 promotes tumor growth, dissemination and a tumor-initiating cell phenotype in colorectal cancer cell xenografts. Carcinogenesis 2013, 34, 2647–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gutschner, T.; Hämmerle, M.; Pazaitis, N.; Bley, N.; Fiskin, E.; Uckelmann, H.; Heim, A.; Groβ, M.; Hofmann, N.; Geffers, R.; et al. Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) is an important protumorigenic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2014, 59, 1900–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, G.; Huang, Z.; Liu, X.; Huang, W.; Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Li, D.; Singer, R.; Gu, W. IMP1 suppresses breast tumor growth and metastasis through the regulation of its target mRNAs. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 15690–15702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hamilton, K.; Chatterji, P.; Lundsmith, E.; Andres, S.; Giroux, V.; Hicks, P.; Noubissi, F.; Spiegelman, V.; Rustgi, A. Loss of Stromal IMP1 Promotes a Tumorigenic Microenvironment in the Colon. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2015, 13, 1478–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, R.; Lu, X.; Zhang, C.; Yin, D. RNA binding motif protein 3: A potential biomarker in cancer and therapeutic target in neuroprotection. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 22235–22250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T.; Cowling, V. Cap-binding complex (CBC). Biochem. J. 2014, 457, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chappell, S.; Mauro, V. The internal ribosome entry site (IRES) contained within the RNA-binding motif protein 3 (Rbm3) mRNA is composed of functionally distinct elements. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 33793–33800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhan, X.; Qian, B.; Cao, F.; Wu, W.; Yang, L.; Guan, Q.; Gu, X.; Wang, P.; Okusolubo, T.; Dunn, S.; et al. An Arabidopsis PWI and RRM motif-containing protein is critical for pre-mRNA splicing and ABA responses. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gu, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Mei, Y.; Zhou, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, M.; Hou, T.; He, D.; Zeng, J. Integrated Analysis and Identification of Critical RNA-Binding Proteins in Bladder Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, C.; Shao, T.; Jiang, X.; Wei, D.; Wang, Z.; Li, M.; Bao, G. Comprehensive analysis of the functions and prognostic significance of RNA-binding proteins in bladder urothelial carcinoma. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020, 12, 7160–7173. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Kishore, S.; Luber, S.; Zavolan, M. Deciphering the role of RNA-binding proteins in the post-transcriptional control of gene expression. Brief. Funct. Genomics 2010, 9, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Phadtare, S.; Alsina, J.; Inouye, M. Cold-shock response and cold-shock proteins. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1999, 2, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhu, X.; Bührer, C.; Wellmann, S. Cold-inducible proteins CIRP and RBM3, a unique couple with activities far beyond the cold. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2016, 73, 3839–3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Godin, K.; Varani, G. How arginine-rich domains coordinate mRNA maturation events. RNA Biol. 2007, 4, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Smart, F.; Aschrafi, A.; Atkins, A.; Owens, G.; Pilotte, J.; Cunningham, B.; Vanderklish, P. Two isoforms of the cold-inducible mRNA-binding protein RBM3 localize to dendrites and promote translation. J. Neurochem. 2007, 101, 1367–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sureban, S.; Ramalingam, S.; Natarajan, G.; May, R.; Subramaniam, D.; Bishnupuri, K.; Morrison, A.; Dieckgraefe, B.; Brackett, D.; Postier, R.; et al. Translation regulatory factor RBM3 is a proto-oncogene that prevents mitotic catastrophe. Oncogene 2008, 27, 4544–4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dresios, J.; Aschrafi, A.; Owens, G.; Vanderklish, P.; Edelman, G.; Mauro, V. Cold stress-induced protein Rbm3 binds 60S ribosomal subunits, alters microRNA levels, and enhances global protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 1865–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pilotte, J.; Dupont-Versteegden, E.; Vanderklish, P. Widespread regulation of miRNA biogenesis at the Dicer step by the cold-inducible RNA-binding protein, RBM3. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wong, J.; Au, A.; Gao, D.; Pinello, N.; Kwok, C.; Thoeng, A.; Lau, K.; Gordon, J.; Schmitz, U.; Feng, Y.; et al. RBM3 regulates temperature sensitive miR-142-5p and miR-143 (thermomiRs), which target immune genes and control fever. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 2888–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Venugopal, A.; Subramaniam, D.; Balmaceda, J.; Roy, B.; Dixon, D.; Umar, S.; Weir, S.; Anant, S. RNA binding protein RBM3 increases β-catenin signaling to increase stem cell characteristics in colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2016, 55, 1503–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Matsuda, A.; Ogawa, M.; Yanai, H.; Naka, D.; Goto, A.; Ao, T.; Tanno, Y.; Takeda, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Honda, K.; et al. Generation of mice deficient in RNA-binding motif protein 3 (RBM3) and characterization of its role in innate immune responses and cell growth. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 411, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ehlén, Å.; Nodin, B.; Rexhepaj, E.; Brändstedt, J.; Uhlén, M.; Alvarado-Kristensson, M.; Pontén, F.; Brennan, D.; Jirström, K. RBM3-regulated genes promote DNA integrity and affect clinical outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer. Transl. Oncol. 2011, 4, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nie, Z.; Chen, M.; Wen, X.; Gao, Y.; Huang, D.; Cao, H.; Peng, Y.; Guo, N.; Ni, J.; Zhang, S. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Tumor Microenvironment in Bladder Cancer: The Missing Link. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 683940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, J.; Li, H.; Yasumura, D.; Cohen, H.; Zhang, C.; Panning, B.; Shokat, K.; Lavail, M.; Walter, P. IRE1 signaling affects cell fate during the unfolded protein response. Science 2007, 318, 944–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhu, X.; Zelmer, A.; Kapfhammer, J.; Wellmann, S. Cold-inducible RBM3 inhibits PERK phosphorylation through cooperation with NF90 to protect cells from endoplasmic reticulum stress. FASEB J. 2016, 30, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rzechorzek, N.; Connick, P.; Patani, R.; Selvaraj, B.; Chandran, S. Hypothermic Preconditioning of Human Cortical Neurons Requires Proteostatic Priming. EBioMedicine 2015, 2, 528–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Poone, G.; Hasseldam, H.; Munkholm, N.; Rasmussen, R.; Grønberg, N.; Johansen, F. The Hypothermic Influence on CHOP and Ero1-α in an Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Model of Cerebral Ischemia. Brain Sci. 2015, 5, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boman, K.; Andersson, G.; Wennersten, C.; Nodin, B.; Ahlgren, G.; Jirström, K. Podocalyxin-like and RNA-binding motif protein 3 are prognostic biomarkers in urothelial bladder cancer: A validatory study. Biomark. Res. 2017, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Boman, K.; Segersten, U.; Ahlgren, G.; Eberhard, J.; Uhlén, M.; Jirström, K.; Malmström, P. Decreased expression of RNA-binding motif protein 3 correlates with tumour progression and poor prognosis in urothelial bladder cancer. BMC Urol. 2013, 13, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Florianova, L.; Xu, B.; Traboulsi, S.; Elmansi, H.; Tanguay, S.; Aprikian, A.; Kassouf, W.; Brimo, F. Evaluation of RNA-binding motif protein 3 expression in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: An immunohistochemical study. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 13, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bartkova, J.; Rajpert-De Meyts, E.; Skakkebaek, N.; Lukas, J.; Bartek, J. DNA damage response in human testes and testicular germ cell tumours: Biology and implications for therapy. Int. J. Androl. 2007, 30, 282–291, discussion 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Karnevi, E.; Dror, L.; Mardinoglu, A.; Elebro, J.; Heby, M.; Olofsson, S.; Nodin, B.; Eberhard, J.; Gallagher, W.; Uhlén, M.; et al. Translational study reveals a two-faced role of RBM3 in pancreatic cancer and suggests its potential value as a biomarker for improved patient stratification. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 6188–6200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Moss, E.; Lee, R.; Ambros, V. The cold shock domain protein LIN-28 controls developmental timing in C. elegans and is regulated by the lin-4 RNA. Cell 1997, 88, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhou, J.; Ng, S.; Chng, W. LIN28/LIN28B: An emerging oncogenic driver in cancer stem cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013, 45, 973–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Huang, Y. A mirror of two faces: Lin28 as a master regulator of both miRNA and mRNA. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2012, 3, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Heo, I.; Joo, C.; Cho, J.; Ha, M.; Han, J.; Kim, V. Lin28 mediates the terminal uridylation of let-7 precursor MicroRNA. Mol. Cell 2008, 32, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lu, L.; Katsaros, D.; Shaverdashvili, K.; Qian, B.; Wu, Y.; de la Longrais, I.; Preti, M.; Menato, G.; Yu, H. Pluripotent factor lin-28 and its homologue lin-28b in epithelial ovarian cancer and their associations with disease outcomes and expression of let-7a and IGF-II. Eur. J. Cancer 2009, 45, 2212–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lei, X.; Xu, J.; Ma, W.; Qiao, C.; Newman, M.; Hammond, S.; Huang, Y. Determinants of mRNA recognition and translation regulation by Lin28. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 3574–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Balzer, E.; Moss, E. Localization of the developmental timing regulator Lin28 to mRNP complexes, P-bodies and stress granules. RNA Biol. 2007, 4, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Piskounova, E.; Polytarchou, C.; Thornton, J.; LaPierre, R.; Pothoulakis, C.; Hagan, J.; Iliopoulos, D.; Gregory, R. Lin28A and Lin28B inhibit let-7 microRNA biogenesis by distinct mechanisms. Cell 2011, 147, 1066–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Calin, G.; Sevignani, C.; Dumitru, C.; Hyslop, T.; Noch, E.; Yendamuri, S.; Shimizu, M.; Rattan, S.; Bullrich, F.; Negrini, M.; et al. Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2999–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chirshev, E.; Oberg, K.; Ioffe, Y.; Unternaehrer, J. Let-7 as biomarker, prognostic indicator, and therapy for precision medicine in cancer. Clin. Transl. Med. 2019, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, Y.; Xie, C.; Zheng, X.; Nie, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Y. let-7LIN28//PD-L1 Pathway as a Target for Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019, 7, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ambros, V.; Horvitz, H. Heterochronic mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 1984, 226, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Balzeau, J.; Menezes, M.; Cao, S.; Hagan, J. The LIN28/let-7 Pathway in Cancer. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kang, M.; Lee, K.; Lee, H.; Jeong, C.; Ku, J.; Kim, H.; Kwak, C. Concurrent treatment with simvastatin and NF-κB inhibitor in human castration-resistant prostate cancer cells exerts synergistic anti-cancer effects via control of the NF-κB/LIN28/let-7 miRNA signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Büssing, I.; Slack, F.; Grosshans, H. let-7 microRNAs in development, stem cells and cancer. Trends Mol. Med. 2008, 14, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Viswanathan, S.; Powers, J.; Einhorn, W.; Hoshida, Y.; Ng, T.; Toffanin, S.; O’Sullivan, M.; Lu, J.; Phillips, L.; Lockhart, V.; et al. Lin28 promotes transformation and is associated with advanced human malignancies. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rybak, A.; Fuchs, H.; Smirnova, L.; Brandt, C.; Pohl, E.; Nitsch, R.; Wulczyn, F. A feedback loop comprising lin-28 and let-7 controls pre-let-7 maturation during neural stem-cell commitment. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 987–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dangi-Garimella, S.; Yun, J.; Eves, E.; Newman, M.; Erkeland, S.; Hammond, S.; Minn, A.; Rosner, M. Raf kinase inhibitory protein suppresses a metastasis signalling cascade involving LIN28 and let-7. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chang, T.; Zeitels, L.; Hwang, H.; Chivukula, R.; Wentzel, E.; Dews, M.; Jung, J.; Gao, P.; Dang, C.; Beer, M.; et al. Lin-28B transactivation is necessary for Myc-mediated let-7 repression and proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 3384–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Iliopoulos, D.; Hirsch, H.; Struhl, K. An epigenetic switch involving NF-kappaB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell 2009, 139, 693–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shee, K.; Seigne, J.; Karagas, M.; Marsit, C.; Hinds, J.; Schned, A.; Pettus, J.; Armstrong, D.; Miller, T.; Andrew, A. Identification of Let-7f-5p as a novel biomarker of recurrence in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Biomark. Sect. A Dis. Mrk. 2020, 29, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Lai, C.; Du, X.; Su, Z.; Gao, S. The Lin28/let-7a/c-Myc pathway plays a role in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Cell Tissue Res. 2013, 354, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhuang, C.; Ma, Q.; Zhuang, C.; Ye, J.; Zhang, F.; Gui, Y. LncRNA GClnc1 promotes proliferation and invasion of bladder cancer through activation of MYC. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 11045–11059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pan, P.; Chen, T.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, Z.; Qin, J.; Cui, G.; Guo, X. LIN28A inhibits lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 1 protein expression in embryonic stem and bladder cancer cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shi, H.; Xie, J.; Wang, K.; Li, W.; Yin, L.; Wang, G.; Wu, Z.; Ni, J.; Mao, W.; Guo, C.; et al. LINC01451 drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition and progression in bladder cancer cells via LIN28/TGF-β/Smad pathway. Cell. Signal. 2021, 81, 109932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Park, S.; Shim, J.; Park, H.; Eum, D.; Park, M.; Mi Yi, J.; Choi, S.; Kim, S.; Son, T.; Lu, W.; et al. MacroH2A1 downregulation enhances the stem-like properties of bladder cancer cells by transactivation of Lin28B. Oncogene 2016, 35, 1292–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lv, K.; Liu, L.; Wang, L.; Yu, J.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Y.; Dong, M.; Teng, R.; Wu, L.; Fu, P.; et al. Lin28 mediates paclitaxel resistance by modulating p21, Rb and Let-7a miRNA in breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liao, W.; Wang, W.; Chang, W.; Tseng, J. The RNA-binding protein HuR stabilizes cytosolic phospholipase A2α mRNA under interleukin-1β treatment in non-small cell lung cancer A549 Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 35499–35508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ma, W.; Cheng, S.; Campbell, C.; Wright, A.; Furneaux, H. Cloning and characterization of HuR, a ubiquitously expressed Elav-like protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 8144–8151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Abdelmohsen, K.; Gorospe, M. Posttranscriptional regulation of cancer traits by HuR. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2010, 1, 214–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zarei, M.; Lal, S.; Parker, S.; Nevler, A.; Vaziri-Gohar, A.; Dukleska, K.; Mambelli-Lisboa, N.; Moffat, C.; Blanco, F.; Chand, S.; et al. Posttranscriptional Upregulation of IDH1 by HuR Establishes a Powerful Survival Phenotype in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 4460–4471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. von Roretz, C.; Di Marco, S.; Mazroui, R.; Gallouzi, I. Turnover of AU-rich-containing mRNAs during stress: A matter of survival. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2011, 2, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Scheiba, R.; de Opakua, A.; Díaz-Quintana, A.; Cruz-Gallardo, I.; Martínez-Cruz, L.; Martínez-Chantar, M.; Blanco, F.; Díaz-Moreno, I. The C-terminal RNA binding motif of HuR is a multi-functional domain leading to HuR oligomerization and binding to U-rich RNA targets. RNA Biol. 2014, 11, 1250–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, R.; Wang, J. HuR stabilizes TFAM mRNA in an ATM/p38-dependent manner in ionizing irradiated cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 2446–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Reglero, C.; Lafarga, V.; Rivas, V.; Albitre, Á.; Ramos, P.; Berciano, S.; Tapia, O.; Martínez-Chantar, M.; Mayor, F.; Penela, P. GRK2-Dependent HuR Phosphorylation Regulates HIF1α Activation under Hypoxia or Adrenergic Stress. Cancers 2020, 12, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zarei, M.; Lal, S.; Vaziri-Gohar, A.; O’Hayer, K.; Gunda, V.; Singh, P.; Brody, J.; Winter, J. RNA-Binding Protein HuR Regulates Both Mutant and Wild-Type IDH1 in IDH1-Mutated Cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2019, 17, 508–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Deka, K.; Saha, S. Heat stress induced arginylation of HuR promotes alternative polyadenylation of Hsp70.3 by regulating HuR stability and RNA binding. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 28, 730–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jehung, J.; Kitamura, T.; Yanagawa-Matsuda, A.; Kuroshima, T.; Towfik, A.; Yasuda, M.; Sano, H.; Kitagawa, Y.; Minowa, K.; Shindoh, M.; et al. Adenovirus infection induces HuR relocalization to facilitate virus replication. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 495, 1795–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cai, J.; Wang, H.; Jiao, X.; Huang, R.; Qin, Q.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Feng, D.; Tian, X.; Wang, H. The RNA-Binding Protein HuR Confers Oxaliplatin Resistance of Colorectal Cancer by Upregulating CDC6. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 1243–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, Y.; Wei, W.; Wang, Y.; Wan, C.; Bai, Y.; Sun, X.; Ma, J.; Zheng, F. TNF-α/calreticulin dual signaling induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation associated with HuR nucleocytoplasmic shuttling in rheumatoid arthritis. Inflamm. Res. 2019, 68, 597–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Doller, A.; Schlepckow, K.; Schwalbe, H.; Pfeilschifter, J.; Eberhardt, W. Tandem phosphorylation of serines 221 and 318 by protein kinase Cdelta coordinates mRNA binding and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of HuR. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30, 1397–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Li, H.; Park, S.; Kilburn, B.; Jelinek, M.; Henschen-Edman, A.; Aswad, D.; Stallcup, M.; Laird-Offringa, I. Lipopolysaccharide-induced methylation of HuR, an mRNA-stabilizing protein, by CARM1. Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 44623–44630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Vancura, A.; Nagar, S.; Kaur, P.; Bu, P.; Bhagwat, M.; Vancurova, I. Reciprocal Regulation of AMPK/SNF1 and Protein Acetylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kulawik, A.; Engesser, R.; Ehlting, C.; Raue, A.; Albrecht, U.; Hahn, B.; Lehmann, W.; Gaestel, M.; Klingmüller, U.; Häussinger, D.; et al. IL-1β-induced and p38-dependent activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) in hepatocytes: Signal transduction with robust and concentration-independent signal amplification. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 6291–6302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. García-Mauriño, S.; Rivero-Rodríguez, F.; Velázquez-Cruz, A.; Hernández-Vellisca, M.; Díaz-Quintana, A.; De la Rosa, M.; Díaz-Moreno, I. RNA Binding Protein Regulation and Cross-Talk in the Control of AU-rich mRNA Fate. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2017, 4, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Donahue, J.; Chang, E.; Xiao, L.; Wang, P.; Rao, J.; Turner, D.; Wang, J.; Battafarano, R. The RNA-binding protein HuR stabilizes survivin mRNA in human oesophageal epithelial cells. Biochem. J. 2011, 437, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Subramaniam, D.; Ramalingam, S.; May, R.; Dieckgraefe, B.; Berg, D.; Pothoulakis, C.; Houchen, C.; Wang, T.; Anant, S. Gastrin-mediated interleukin-8 and cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression: Differential transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms. Gastroenterology 2008, 134, 1070–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xie, M.; Yu, T.; Jing, X.; Ma, L.; Fan, Y.; Yang, F.; Ma, P.; Jiang, H.; Wu, X.; Shu, Y.; et al. Exosomal circSHKBP1 promotes gastric cancer progression via regulating the miR-582-3p/HUR/VEGF axis and suppressing HSP90 degradation. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Liu, L.; Christodoulou-Vafeiadou, E.; Rao, J.; Zou, T.; Xiao, L.; Chung, H.; Yang, H.; Gorospe, M.; Kontoyiannis, D.; Wang, J. RNA-binding protein HuR promotes growth of small intestinal mucosa by activating the Wnt signaling pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 2014, 25, 3308–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Miyata, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Sagara, Y.; Mitsunari, K.; Matsuo, T.; Ohba, K.; Sakai, H. High expression of HuR in cytoplasm, but not nuclei, is associated with malignant aggressiveness and prognosis in bladder cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fus, Ł.; Pihowicz, P.; Koperski, Ł.; Marczewska, J.; Górnicka, B. High cytoplasmic HuR expression is associated with advanced pT stage, high grade and increased microvessel density in urothelial bladder carcinoma. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2018, 33, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Matsuo, T.; Miyata, Y.; Asai, A.; Sagara, Y.; Furusato, B.; Fukuoka, J.; Sakai, H. Green Tea Polyphenol Induces Changes in Cancer-Related Factors in an Animal Model of Bladder Cancer. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Guo, J.; Lv, J.; Chang, S.; Chen, Z.; Lu, W.; Xu, C.; Liu, M.; Pang, X. Inhibiting cytoplasmic accumulation of HuR synergizes genotoxic agents in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 45249–45262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xiao, M.; Liu, J.; Xiang, L.; Zhao, K.; He, D.; Zeng, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Xie, D.; Deng, M.; Zhu, Y.; et al. MAFG-AS1 promotes tumor progression via regulation of the HuR/PTBP1 axis in bladder urothelial carcinoma. Clin. Transl. Med. 2020, 10, e241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Lu, W.; Mai, L.; Guo, H.; Liu, X. Long noncoding RNA HCG22 suppresses proliferation and metastasis of bladder cancer cells by regulation of PTBP1. J. Cell. Physiol. 2020, 235, 1711–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Yu, D.; Zhang, C.; Gui, J. RNA-binding protein HuR promotes bladder cancer progression by competitively binding to the long noncoding HOTAIR with miR-1. OncoTargets Ther. 2017, 10, 2609–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hua, X.; Huang, M.; Deng, X.; Xu, J.; Luo, Y.; Xie, Q.; Xu, J.; Tian, Z.; Li, J.; Zhu, J.; et al. The inhibitory effect of compound ChlA-F on human bladder cancer cell invasion can be attributed to its blockage of SOX2 protein. Cell Death Differ. 2020, 27, 632–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tian, Z.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, J.; Hua, X.; Xu, J.; Huang, C.; Jin, H.; Huang, H.; Huang, C. Transcriptionally elevation of miR-494 by new ChlA-F compound via a HuR/JunB axis inhibits human bladder cancer cell invasion. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta. Gene Regul. Mech. 2019, 1862, 822–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Huang, Y.; Peng, W.; Furuuchi, N.; Gerhart, J.; Rhodes, K.; Mukherjee, N.; Jimbo, M.; Gonye, G.; Brody, J.; Getts, R.; et al. Delivery of Therapeutics Targeting the mRNA-Binding Protein HuR Using 3DNA Nanocarriers Suppresses Ovarian Tumor Growth. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Muralidharan, R.; Babu, A.; Amreddy, N.; Basalingappa, K.; Mehta, M.; Chen, A.; Zhao, Y.; Kompella, U.; Munshi, A.; Ramesh, R. Folate receptor-targeted nanoparticle delivery of HuR-RNAi suppresses lung cancer cell proliferation and migration. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 14, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wang, J.; Hjelmeland, A.; Nabors, L.; King, P. Anti-cancer effects of the HuR inhibitor, MS-444, in malignant glioma cells. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2019, 20, 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Geuens, T.; Bouhy, D.; Timmerman, V. The hnRNP family: Insights into their role in health and disease. Hum. Genet. 2016, 135, 851–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Han, S.; Tang, Y.; Smith, R. Functional diversity of the hnRNPs: Past, present and perspectives. Biochem. J. 2010, 430, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Piñol-Roma, S.; Choi, Y.; Matunis, M.; Dreyfuss, G. Immunopurification of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles reveals an assortment of RNA-binding proteins. Genes Dev. 1988, 2, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pawson, T. Protein modules and signalling networks. Nature 1995, 373, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kiledjian, M.; Dreyfuss, G. Primary structure and binding activity of the hnRNP U protein: Binding RNA through RGG box. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 2655–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cartegni, L.; Maconi, M.; Morandi, E.; Cobianchi, F.; Riva, S.; Biamonti, G. hnRNP A1 selectively interacts through its Gly-rich domain with different RNA-binding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 259, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chen, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Chen, S.; Li, Y.; Zou, J.; Zeng, X. Role of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K in tumor development. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 14296–14305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Beusch, I.; Barraud, P.; Moursy, A.; Cléry, A.; Allain, F. Tandem hnRNP A1 RNA recognition motifs act in concert to repress the splicing of survival motor neuron exon 7. eLife 2017, 6, e25736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jensen, K.; Dredge, B.; Stefani, G.; Zhong, R.; Buckanovich, R.; Okano, H.; Yang, Y.; Darnell, R. Nova-1 regulates neuron-specific alternative splicing and is essential for neuronal viability. Neuron 2000, 25, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Piñol-Roma, S.; Dreyfuss, G. Shuttling of pre-mRNA binding proteins between nucleus and cytoplasm. Nature 1992, 355, 730–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rebane, A.; Aab, A.; Steitz, J. Transportins 1 and 2 are redundant nuclear import factors for hnRNP A1 and HuR. RNA 2004, 10, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Allemand, E.; Guil, S.; Myers, M.; Moscat, J.; Cáceres, J.; Krainer, A. Regulation of heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 transport by phosphorylation in cells stressed by osmotic shock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 3605–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Amano, N.; Matsumoto, K.; Shimizu, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Tsumura, H.; Ishii, D.; Sato, Y.; Iwamura, M. High HNRNPA3 expression is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in patients treated with radical cystectomy. Urol. Oncol. 2021, 39, 196.e1–196.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Su, C.; Su, J.; Lin, J.; Chen, C.; Hwang, W.; Huang, H.; Wu, Y. An investigation into the cytotoxic effects of 13-acetoxysarcocrassolide from the soft coral Sarcophyton crassocaule on bladder cancer cells. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 2622–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Li, X.; Huang, C.; Zhang, X.; Yang, T.; Zuo, S.; Fu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, C.; Chen, L. Discovery of bladder cancer biomarkers in paired pre- and postoperative urine samples. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2021, 10, 3402–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Shi, Z.; Hao, L.; Han, X.; Wu, Z.; Pang, K.; Dong, Y.; Qin, J.; Wang, G.; Zhang, X.; Xia, T.; et al. Targeting HNRNPU to overcome cisplatin resistance in bladder cancer. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Micalizzi, D.; Farabaugh, S.; Ford, H. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: Parallels between normal development and tumor progression. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2010, 15, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Lv, D.; Wu, H.; Xing, R.; Shu, F.; Lei, B.; Lei, C.; Zhou, X.; Wan, B.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, L.; et al. HnRNP-L mediates bladder cancer progression by inhibiting apoptotic signaling and enhancing MAPK signaling pathways. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 13586–13599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Li, F.; Zhao, H.; Su, M.; Xie, W.; Fang, Y.; Du, Y.; Yu, Z.; Hou, L.; Tan, W. HnRNP-F regulates EMT in bladder cancer by mediating the stabilization of Snail1 mRNA by binding to its 3’ UTR. EBioMedicine 2019, 45, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chen, C.; Luo, Y.; He, W.; Zhao, Y.; Kong, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhong, G.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; et al. Exosomal long noncoding RNA LNMAT2 promotes lymphatic metastasis in bladder cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 404–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zeng, J.; Xu, H.; Huang, C.; Sun, Y.; Xiao, H.; Yu, G.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, W.; Xiao, W.; et al. CD46 splice variant enhances translation of specific mRNAs linked to an aggressive tumor cell phenotype in bladder cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2021, 24, 140–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Li, F.; Su, M.; Zhao, H.; Xie, W.; Cao, S.; Xu, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, L.; Hou, L.; Tan, W. HnRNP-F promotes cell proliferation by regulating TPX2 in bladder cancer. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 7035–7048. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  127. Li, F.; Xie, W.; Fang, Y.; Xie, K.; Liu, W.; Hou, L.; Tan, W. HnRNP-F promotes the proliferation of bladder cancer cells mediated by PI3K/AKT/FOXO1. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Chen, X.; Gu, P.; Xie, R.; Han, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, B.; Xie, W.; Xie, W.; Zhong, G.; Chen, C.; et al. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K is associated with poor prognosis and regulates proliferation and apoptosis in bladder cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 1266–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Aboushousha, T.; Hammam, O.; Helal, N.; El Dahshan, S. Impact of Cyclin D1 and Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein-K (HnRNP-K) on Urinary Bladder Carcinogenesis. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP 2018, 19, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhao, F.; Qin, S.; Huang, L.; Ding, L.; Shi, X.; Zhong, G. Long noncoding RNA AK023096 interacts with hnRNP-K and contributes to the maintenance of self-renewal in bladder cancer stem-like cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2021, 409, 112909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Tiwari, M.; Bansal, V.; Sen, G. Regulation of integrin and extracellular matrix genes by HNRNPL is necessary for epidermal renewal. PLoS Biol. 2021, 19, e3001378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Deng, M.; Wang, N.; Li, Z.; Chen, R.; Duan, J.; Peng, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Zheng, X.; et al. FXR1 can bind with the CFIm25/CFIm68 complex and promote the progression of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder by stabilizing TRAF1 mRNA. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Li, P.; Mi, Q.; Yan, S.; Xie, Y.; Cui, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Gao, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Characterization of circSCL38A1 as a novel oncogene in bladder cancer via targeting ILF3/TGF-β2 signaling axis. Cell Death Dis. 2023, 14, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Mancarella, C.; Scotlandi, K. IGF2BP3 From Physiology to Cancer: Novel Discoveries, Unsolved Issues, and Future Perspectives. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Huang, X.; Zhang, H.; Guo, X.; Zhu, Z.; Cai, H.; Kong, X. Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) in cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Huang, H.; Weng, H.; Sun, W.; Qin, X.; Shi, H.; Wu, H.; Zhao, B.; Mesquita, A.; Liu, C.; Yuan, C.; et al. Publisher Correction: Recognition of RNA N-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 22, 1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Schneider, T.; Hung, L.; Aziz, M.; Wilmen, A.; Thaum, S.; Wagner, J.; Janowski, R.; Müller, S.; Schreiner, S.; Friedhoff, P.; et al. Combinatorial recognition of clustered RNA elements by the multidomain RNA-binding protein IMP3. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Wang, P.; Wang, X.; Liu, M.; Zeng, Z.; Lin, C.; Xu, W.; Ma, W.; Wang, J.; Xiang, Q.; Johnston, R.; et al. The Oncogenic Functions of Insulin-like Growth Factor 2 mRNA-Binding Protein 3 in Human Carcinomas. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 26, 3939–3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lee, D.; Xylinas, E.; Rieken, M.; Khani, F.; Klatte, T.; Wood, C.; Karam, J.; Weizer, A.; Raman, J.; Remzi, M.; et al. Insulin-like growth factor messenger RNA-binding protein 3 expression helps prognostication in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 2014, 66, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Huang, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zha, H.; Zhou, X.; Fu, B.; Guo, J.; Wang, G. IGF2BP3 facilitates cell proliferation and tumorigenesis via modulation of JAK/STAT signalling pathway in human bladder cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 13949–13960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jia, W.; Yao, Z.; Zhao, J.; Guan, Q.; Gao, L. New perspectives of physiological and pathological functions of nucleolin (NCL). Life Sci. 2017, 186, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Berger, C.; Gaume, X.; Bouvet, P. The roles of nucleolin subcellular localization in cancer. Biochimie 2015, 113, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Srivastava, M.; McBride, O.; Fleming, P.; Pollard, H.; Burns, A. Genomic organization and chromosomal localization of the human nucleolin gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 14922–14931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Cheng, Y.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, S.; Nigim, F.; Zhou, G.; Yu, Z.; Song, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y. AS1411-Induced Growth Inhibition of Glioma Cells by Up-Regulation of p53 and Down-Regulation of Bcl-2 and Akt1 via Nucleolin. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Ginisty, H.; Sicard, H.; Roger, B.; Bouvet, P. Structure and functions of nucleolin. J. Cell Sci. 1999, 112, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Chen, Z.; Xu, X. Roles of nucleolin. Focus on cancer and anti-cancer therapy. Saudi Med. J. 2016, 37, 1312–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ugrinova, I.; Monier, K.; Ivaldi, C.; Thiry, M.; Storck, S.; Mongelard, F.; Bouvet, P. Inactivation of nucleolin leads to nucleolar disruption, cell cycle arrest and defects in centrosome duplication. BMC Mol. Biol. 2007, 8, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Xu, J.; Lu, S.; Xu, X.; Hu, S.; Li, B.; Qi, R.; Chen, L.; Chang, J. Knocking Down Nucleolin Expression Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Influencing DNA-PKcs Activity. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP 2015, 16, 3301–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Benedetti, E.; Antonosante, A.; d’Angelo, M.; Cristiano, L.; Galzio, R.; Destouches, D.; Florio, T.; Dhez, A.; Astarita, C.; Cinque, B.; et al. Nucleolin antagonist triggers autophagic cell death in human glioblastoma primary cells and decreased in vivo tumor growth in orthotopic brain tumor model. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 42091–42104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Subramanian, N.; Srimany, A.; Kanwar, J.; Kanwar, R.; Akilandeswari, B.; Rishi, P.; Khetan, V.; Vasudevan, M.; Pradeep, T.; Krishnakumar, S. Nucleolin-aptamer therapy in retinoblastoma: Molecular changes and mass spectrometry-based imaging. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2016, 5, e358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Shang, Y.; Kakinuma, S.; Nishimura, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Nagata, K.; Shimada, Y. Interleukin-9 receptor gene is transcriptionally regulated by nucleolin in T-cell lymphoma cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2012, 51, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. D’Avino, C.; Palmieri, D.; Braddom, A.; Zanesi, N.; James, C.; Cole, S.; Salvatore, F.; Croce, C.; De Lorenzo, C. A novel fully human anti-NCL immunoRNase for triple-negative breast cancer therapy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 87016–87030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Palmieri, D.; Richmond, T.; Piovan, C.; Sheetz, T.; Zanesi, N.; Troise, F.; James, C.; Wernicke, D.; Nyei, F.; Gordon, T.; et al. Human anti-nucleolin recombinant immunoagent for cancer therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 9418–9423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Gilles, M.; Maione, F.; Cossutta, M.; Carpentier, G.; Caruana, L.; Di Maria, S.; Houppe, C.; Destouches, D.; Shchors, K.; Prochasson, C.; et al. Nucleolin Targeting Impairs the Progression of Pancreatic Cancer and Promotes the Normalization of Tumor Vasculature. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 7181–7193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Fogal, V.; Sugahara, K.; Ruoslahti, E.; Christian, S. Cell surface nucleolin antagonist causes endothelial cell apoptosis and normalization of tumor vasculature. Angiogenesis 2009, 12, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Ding, Y.; Song, N.; Liu, C.; He, T.; Zhuo, W.; He, X.; Chen, Y.; Song, X.; Fu, Y.; Luo, Y. Heat shock cognate 70 regulates the translocation and angiogenic function of nucleolin. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012, 32, e126–e134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Qian, B.; Yao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yan, M.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y. Nucleolin identified by comparative mass-spectra analysis is a potential marker for invasive progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 10, 1489–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Li, Y.; Tang, Y.; Ye, L.; Liu, B.; Liu, K.; Chen, J.; Xue, Q. Establishment of a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line with unique metastatic characteristics through in vivo selection and screening for metastasis-related genes through cDNA microarray. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 129, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Choi, W.; Yang, Y.; Xu, Y.; An, J. Targeting chemokine receptor CXCR4 for treatment of HIV-1 infection, tumor progression, and metastasis. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 1574–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Niu, H.; Yang, X.; Xu, Z.; Du, T.; Wang, R. Cell surface nucleolin interacts with CXCR4 receptor via the 212 c-terminal portion. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc. Oncodevelopmental Biol. Med. 2015, 36, 1099–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yu, Y.; Jin, H.; Xu, J.; Gu, J.; Li, X.; Xie, Q.; Huang, H.; Li, J.; Tian, Z.; Jiang, G.; et al. XIAP overexpression promotes bladder cancer invasion in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo via enhancing nucleolin-mediated Rho-GDIβ mRNA stability. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 2040–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Ren, S.; Zhang, N.; Shen, L.; Lu, Y.; Chang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Sun, N.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Huang, H.; et al. Lnc00892 competes with c-Jun to block NCL transcription, reducing the stability of RhoA/RhoC mRNA and impairing bladder cancer invasion. Oncogene 2021, 40, 6579–6589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Jin, H.; Yu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Lu, C.; Li, J.; Gu, J.; Zhang, L.; Huang, H.; Zhang, D.; Wu, X.; et al. Divergent behaviors and underlying mechanisms of cell migration and invasion in non-metastatic T24 and its metastatic derivative T24T bladder cancer cell lines. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 522–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Daizumoto, K.; Yoshimaru, T.; Matsushita, Y.; Fukawa, T.; Uehara, H.; Ono, M.; Komatsu, M.; Kanayama, H.; Katagiri, T. A DDX31/Mutant-p53/EGFR Axis Promotes Multistep Progression of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 2233–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Lubet, R.; Lu, Y.; Bode, A.; You, M.; Verney, Z.; Steele, V.; Townsend, R.; Juliana, M.; Grubbs, C. Efficacy of the EGFr inhibitor Iressa on development of chemically-induced urinary bladder cancers: Dose dependency and modulation of biomarkers. Oncol. Rep. 2011, 25, 1389–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Vernet, C.; Artzt, K. STAR, a gene family involved in signal transduction and activation of RNA. Trends Genet. TIG 1997, 13, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Artzt, K.; Wu, J. STAR trek: An introduction to STAR family proteins and review of quaking (QKI). Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 693, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  168. Teplova, M.; Hafner, M.; Teplov, D.; Essig, K.; Tuschl, T.; Patel, D. Structure-function studies of STAR family Quaking proteins bound to their in vivo RNA target sites. Genes Dev. 2013, 27, 928–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Darbelli, L.; Richard, S. Emerging functions of the Quaking RNA-binding proteins and link to human diseases. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2016, 7, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Farnsworth, B.; Peuckert, C.; Zimmermann, B.; Jazin, E.; Kettunen, P.; Emilsson, L. Gene Expression of Quaking in Sporadic Alzheimer’s Disease Patients is Both Upregulated and Related to Expression Levels of Genes Involved in Amyloid Plaque and Neurofibrillary Tangle Formation. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016, 53, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Galarneau, A.; Richard, S. Target RNA motif and target mRNAs of the Quaking STAR protein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ryder, S.; Frater, L.; Abramovitz, D.; Goodwin, E.; Williamson, J. RNA target specificity of the STAR/GSG domain post-transcriptional regulatory protein GLD-1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Zhang, R.; Yang, J.; Peng, L.; Zheng, L.; Xie, P.; Wang, M.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, F.; Qian, C.; et al. RNA-binding protein QKI-5 inhibits the proliferation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via post-transcriptional stabilization of RASA1 mRNA. Cell Cycle 2016, 15, 3094–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Novikov, L.; Park, J.; Chen, H.; Klerman, H.; Jalloh, A.; Gamble, M. QKI-mediated alternative splicing of the histone variant MacroH2A1 regulates cancer cell proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31, 4244–4255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Bian, Y.; Wang, L.; Lu, H.; Yang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, H.; Lu, X.; Wei, M.; Sun, J.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Downregulation of tumor suppressor QKI in gastric cancer and its implication in cancer prognosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 422, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Yang, G.; Fu, H.; Zhang, J.; Lu, X.; Yu, F.; Jin, L.; Bai, L.; Huang, B.; Shen, L.; Feng, Y.; et al. RNA-binding protein quaking, a critical regulator of colon epithelial differentiation and a suppressor of colon cancer. Gastroenterology 2010, 138, 231–240.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wei, M.; Lu, X.; Fu, H.; Feng, F.; Wang, S.; Lu, W.; Wu, N.; Lu, Z.; et al. The tumor suppressing effects of QKI-5 in prostate cancer: A novel diagnostic and prognostic protein. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2014, 15, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Shi, F.; Deng, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Jiang, C.; Zhao, R.; Sun, F.; Cui, D.; Bei, X.; Yang, B.; Sun, Q.; et al. QKI-6 inhibits bladder cancer malignant behaviours through down-regulating E2F3 and NF-κB signalling. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 6578–6594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Wei, X.; Wang, B.; Wang, Q.; Yang, X.; Yang, Y.; Fang, Z.; Yi, C.; Shi, L.; Fan, X.; Tao, J.; et al. MiR-362-5p, Which Is Regulated by Long Non-Coding RNA MBNL1-AS1, Promotes the Cell Proliferation and Tumor Growth of Bladder Cancer by Targeting QKI. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. LeBleu, V.; Kalluri, R. A peek into cancer-associated fibroblasts: Origins, functions and translational impact. Dis. Model. Mech. 2018, 11, dmm029447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Quail, D.; Joyce, J. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1423–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Kharaishvili, G.; Simkova, D.; Bouchalova, K.; Gachechiladze, M.; Narsia, N.; Bouchal, J. The role of cancer-associated fibroblasts, solid stress and other microenvironmental factors in tumor progression and therapy resistance. Cancer Cell Int. 2014, 14, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Zhou, Z.; Cui, D.; Sun, M.; Huang, J.; Deng, Z.; Han, B.; Sun, X.; Xia, S.; Sun, F.; Shi, F. CAFs-derived MFAP5 promotes bladder cancer malignant behavior through NOTCH2/HEY1 signaling. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2020, 34, 7970–7988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Bley, N.; Hmedat, A.; Müller, S.; Rolnik, R.; Rausch, A.; Lederer, M.; Hüttelmaier, S. Musashi-1-A Stemness RBP for Cancer Therapy? Biology 2021, 10, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Sun, J.; Sheng, W.; Ma, Y.; Dong, M. Potential Role of Musashi-2 RNA-Binding Protein in Cancer EMT. OncoTargets Ther. 2021, 14, 1969–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Qi, X.; Zhang, F.; Wu, H.; Liu, J.; Zong, B.; Xu, C.; Jiang, J. Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) expression and prognosis in solid cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Gupta, G.; Bebawy, M.; Pinto, T.; Chellappan, D.; Mishra, A.; Dua, K. Role of the Tristetraprolin (Zinc Finger Protein 36 Homolog) Gene in Cancer. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2018, 28, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Saini, Y.; Chen, J.; Patial, S. The Tristetraprolin Family of RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer: Progress and Future Prospects. Cancers 2020, 12, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Schuschel, K.; Helwig, M.; Hüttelmaier, S.; Heckl, D.; Klusmann, J.; Hoell, J. RNA-Binding Proteins in Acute Leukemias. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Wang, E.; Lu, S.; Pastore, A.; Chen, X.; Imig, J.; Chun-Wei Lee, S.; Hockemeyer, K.; Ghebrechristos, Y.; Yoshimi, A.; Inoue, D.; et al. Targeting an RNA-Binding Protein Network in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Cell 2019, 35, 369–384.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Yamauchi, T.; Masuda, T.; Canver, M.; Seiler, M.; Semba, Y.; Shboul, M.; Al-Raqad, M.; Maeda, M.; Schoonenberg, V.; Cole, M.; et al. Genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 Screen Identifies Leukemia-Specific Dependence on a Pre-mRNA Metabolic Pathway Regulated by DCPS. Cancer Cell 2018, 33, 386–400.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Yan, J.; Kang, D.; Turnbull, G.; Dong, Y. Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 system for screening and editing RNA binding proteins in cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 180, 114042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Wang, F.; Song, W.; Zhao, H.; Ma, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhai, D.; Pi, J.; Si, Y.; Xu, J.; Dong, L.; et al. The RNA-binding protein QKI5 regulates primary miR-124-1 processing via a distal RNA motif during erythropoiesis. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 416–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Chen, A.; Paik, J.; Zhang, H.; Shukla, S.; Mortensen, R.; Hu, J.; Ying, H.; Hu, B.; Hurt, J.; Farny, N.; et al. STAR RNA-binding protein Quaking suppresses cancer via stabilization of specific miRNA. Genes Dev. 2012, 26, 1459–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. He, B.; Gao, S.; Huang, L.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, M.; Shi, H.; Song, Q.; Shan, Y. MicroRNA-155 promotes the proliferation and invasion abilities of colon cancer cells by targeting quaking. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 2355–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Danan-Gotthold, M.; Golan-Gerstl, R.; Eisenberg, E.; Meir, K.; Karni, R.; Levanon, E. Identification of recurrent regulated alternative splicing events across human solid tumors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 5130–5144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Xi, Z.; Wang, P.; Xue, Y.; Shang, C.; Liu, X.; Ma, J.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Bao, M.; Liu, Y. Overexpression of miR-29a reduces the oncogenic properties of glioblastoma stem cells by downregulating Quaking gene isoform 6. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 24949–24963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Fu, X.; Feng, Y. QKI-5 suppresses cyclin D1 expression and proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells via MAPK signalling pathway. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 44, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Zhou, X.; Li, X.; Sun, C.; Shi, C.; Hua, D.; Yu, L.; Wen, Y.; Hua, F.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Q.; et al. Quaking-5 suppresses aggressiveness of lung cancer cells through inhibiting β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 82174–82184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Castello, A.; Fischer, B.; Eichelbaum, K.; Horos, R.; Beckmann, B.; Strein, C.; Davey, N.; Humphreys, D.; Preiss, T.; Steinmetz, L.; et al. Insights into RNA biology from an atlas of mammalian mRNA-binding proteins. Cell 2012, 149, 1393–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Wang, T.; Xiao, G.; Chu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Corey, D.; Xie, Y. Design and bioinformatics analysis of genome-wide CLIP experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 5263–5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. King, C.; Cuatrecasas, M.; Castells, A.; Sepulveda, A.; Lee, J.; Rustgi, A. LIN28B promotes colon cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 4260–4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Sánchez-Jiménez, C.; Ludeña, M.; Izquierdo, J. T-cell intracellular antigens function as tumor suppressor genes. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Molenaar, J.; Domingo-Fernández, R.; Ebus, M.; Lindner, S.; Koster, J.; Drabek, K.; Mestdagh, P.; van Sluis, P.; Valentijn, L.; van Nes, J.; et al. LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1199–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Kato, T.; Hayama, S.; Yamabuki, T.; Ishikawa, N.; Miyamoto, M.; Ito, T.; Tsuchiya, E.; Kondo, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Daigo, Y. Increased expression of insulin-like growth factor-II messenger RNA-binding protein 1 is associated with tumor progression in patients with lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Wu, X.; Lan, L.; Wilson, D.; Marquez, R.; Tsao, W.; Gao, P.; Roy, A.; Turner, B.; McDonald, P.; Tunge, J.; et al. Identification and validation of novel small molecule disruptors of HuR-mRNA interaction. ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 1476–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Roos, M.; Pradère, U.; Ngondo, R.; Behera, A.; Allegrini, S.; Civenni, G.; Zagalak, J.; Marchand, J.; Menzi, M.; Towbin, H.; et al. A Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Lin28. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 2773–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 15 01150 g001 550
Figure 1. Transcriptional networks that regulate LIN28B expression. LIN28B expression is lost. In adult mammals, only a small subset of somatic cells exist where LIN28B expression occurs. Several transcription factors, such as MYC and NF-κB, promote LIN28B transcription, while REST and ESE3/EHF are transcriptional repressors. IL-6: interleukin-6, RAS: Resistance to audiogenic seizures, NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa-B, MYC: MYC protooncogene.
Figure 1. Transcriptional networks that regulate LIN28B expression. LIN28B expression is lost. In adult mammals, only a small subset of somatic cells exist where LIN28B expression occurs. Several transcription factors, such as MYC and NF-κB, promote LIN28B transcription, while REST and ESE3/EHF are transcriptional repressors. IL-6: interleukin-6, RAS: Resistance to audiogenic seizures, NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa-B, MYC: MYC protooncogene.
Cancers 15 01150 g001
Cancers 15 01150 g002 550
Figure 2. Nucleoplasmic transport of HuR. HuR is mainly distributed in the nucleus, but when stimulated by factors such as microenvironmental changes, HuR can bind to target mRNA to form a HuR-mRNA complex, which protects the target mRNA from degradation by nucleic acid exonucleases and transfers it from the nucleus to the cytoplasm via HNS. Subsequently, HuR dissociates from the target mRNA and rapidly returns to the nucleus with the assistance of transporter proteins such as importin α1. Nucleoplasmic translocation of HuR increases the stability of the target mRNA, promotes mRNA translation, and causes a variety of inflammatory phenotypes, ultimately promoting tumor formation and progression. RRM: RNA recognition motif, HuR: human antigen R, HNS: HuR nucleoplasmic shuttling sequence.
Figure 2. Nucleoplasmic transport of HuR. HuR is mainly distributed in the nucleus, but when stimulated by factors such as microenvironmental changes, HuR can bind to target mRNA to form a HuR-mRNA complex, which protects the target mRNA from degradation by nucleic acid exonucleases and transfers it from the nucleus to the cytoplasm via HNS. Subsequently, HuR dissociates from the target mRNA and rapidly returns to the nucleus with the assistance of transporter proteins such as importin α1. Nucleoplasmic translocation of HuR increases the stability of the target mRNA, promotes mRNA translation, and causes a variety of inflammatory phenotypes, ultimately promoting tumor formation and progression. RRM: RNA recognition motif, HuR: human antigen R, HNS: HuR nucleoplasmic shuttling sequence.
Cancers 15 01150 g002
Cancers 15 01150 g003 550
Figure 3. The way in which LncRNA interacts with hnRNP to regulate gene expression. LncRNA interacts with hnRNP to induce or inhibit gene expression; LncRNA regulates genome structure through interaction with hnRNP and indirectly affects gene expression; the interaction between lncRNA and hnRNP controls the stability and translation of mRNA.
Figure 3. The way in which LncRNA interacts with hnRNP to regulate gene expression. LncRNA interacts with hnRNP to induce or inhibit gene expression; LncRNA regulates genome structure through interaction with hnRNP and indirectly affects gene expression; the interaction between lncRNA and hnRNP controls the stability and translation of mRNA.
Cancers 15 01150 g003
Cancers 15 01150 g004 550
Figure 4. RBPs and bladder cancer. Various RBPs promote bladder cancer progression by promoting bladder cancer proliferation, e.g., HuR can stabilize HOTAIR mRNA; or promoting bladder cancer proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis, invasion, metastasis, e.g., LIN28A/LIN28B; or promoting angiogenesis, e.g., QKI promotes cancer-related fibroblasts to secrete MFAP5, the main component of elastic fibers, to recruit new blood vessels; or activating EMT in bladder cancer. There remain some RBPs that can inhibit clinical progression of bladder cancer by cell cycle blockage, e.g., RBM3 silenced can increase the number of G2/M stage cells and eventually lead to apoptosis or modulation of cell proliferation and invasion. This figure was made using Figdraw.
Figure 4. RBPs and bladder cancer. Various RBPs promote bladder cancer progression by promoting bladder cancer proliferation, e.g., HuR can stabilize HOTAIR mRNA; or promoting bladder cancer proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis, invasion, metastasis, e.g., LIN28A/LIN28B; or promoting angiogenesis, e.g., QKI promotes cancer-related fibroblasts to secrete MFAP5, the main component of elastic fibers, to recruit new blood vessels; or activating EMT in bladder cancer. There remain some RBPs that can inhibit clinical progression of bladder cancer by cell cycle blockage, e.g., RBM3 silenced can increase the number of G2/M stage cells and eventually lead to apoptosis or modulation of cell proliferation and invasion. This figure was made using Figdraw.
Cancers 15 01150 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, Y.; Cao, H.; Huang, D.; Zheng, L.; Nie, Z.; Zhang, S. RNA-Binding Proteins in Bladder Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041150

AMA Style

Gao Y, Cao H, Huang D, Zheng L, Nie Z, Zhang S. RNA-Binding Proteins in Bladder Cancer. Cancers. 2023; 15(4):1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041150

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Yuanhui, Hui Cao, Denggao Huang, Linlin Zheng, Zhenyu Nie, and Shufang Zhang. 2023. "RNA-Binding Proteins in Bladder Cancer" Cancers 15, no. 4: 1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041150

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop