Next Article in Journal
A Network of MicroRNAs and mRNAs Involved in Melanosome Maturation and Trafficking Defines the Lower Response of Pigmentable Melanoma Cells to Targeted Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Polyphenolic Boronates Inhibit Tumor Cell Proliferation: Potential Mitigators of Oxidants in the Tumor Microenvironment
Previous Article in Journal
Combination Modality Using Quercetin to Enhance the Efficacy of Docetaxel in Prostate Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prognostic Implications of the Residual Tumor Microenvironment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients without Pathological Complete Response
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Intraoperative Imaging Techniques to Improve Surgical Resection Margins of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Current Literature†

Cancers 2023, 15(3), 896; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030896
by Bertram J. de Kleijn 1, Gijs T. N. Heldens 1, Jasmijn M. Herruer 1, Cornelis F. M. Sier 2, Cesare Piazza 3, Remco de Bree 4, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius 5, Luiz P. Kowalski 6,7, Vincent Vander Poorten 8,9, Juan P. Rodrigo 10, Nina Zidar 11, Cherie-Ann Nathan 12, Raymond K. Tsang 13, Pawel Golusinski 14, Ashok R. Shaha 15, Alfio Ferlito 16 and Robert P. Takes 1,*
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Cancers 2023, 15(3), 896; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030896
Submission received: 21 December 2022 / Revised: 24 January 2023 / Accepted: 26 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Targeting Solid Tumors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I have just a few minor grammar/unclear phrases

 

line 236:   It appears to be a "run on" sentance

Line 331:  I am having touble following all the "cut-offs"

line 387:  "which is may be used"??

line 401:  I assume you are reffer to a ROC analysis when you state "area under the curve"... Should be more explicit

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your positive review and suggestions for improvement. We have used them to revise the manuscript accordingly and hope this will be satisfactory.

With kind regards,

Sicerely,

Robert Takes

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a comprehensive review, summarizing the available evidence regarding a wide range of techniques and approaches aiming to intraoperatively assess resection margins in oropharyngeal carcinomas (including frozen section analysis, autofluorescence imaging, fluorescence imaging, NBI, confocal laser endoscopy, high resolution microendoscopic imaging, ultrasound, intraoperative CT).

As it is well-known, one of the most relevant issues regarding the interpretation and systematization of literature regarding surgical margins in oropharyngeal carcinomas is their definition, which is still heterogeneous. However, Authors adequately addressed this issue, also providing a useful table. 

Overall, this article is well written, comprehensive, detailed, and methodologically sonud, providing potentially useful data on approaches which are currently matter of increasing scientific interest, although most of them are still not part of the routine clinical practice.

I'd just recommend to add a PRISMA flow-chart to the methods section, to make more evident to the reader the study selection process.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your positive review and suggestion for improvement. The suggested flow-chart is added to the manuscript.

With kind regards,

Sincerely,

Robert Takes

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The literature review on intraoperative imaging techniques to improve surgical resection margins of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer is very comprehensive. 

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your positive review. We made improvements in the manuscript according to the suggestions of the reviewers.

With kind regards,

Sincerely,

Robert Takes

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop