Next Article in Journal
The Hematology of Tomorrow Is Here—Preclinical Models Are Not: Cell Therapy for Hematological Malignancies
Next Article in Special Issue
Follicular Thyroid Adenoma and Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma—A Common or Distinct Background? Loss of Heterozygosity in Comprehensive Microarray Study
Previous Article in Journal
Metformin as a Potential Treatment Option for Endometriosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impaired Glucose Metabolism, Anti-Diabetes Medications, and Risk of Thyroid Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TROP-2, Nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 Are Potentially Therapeutic Targets for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

1
Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
2
Molecular Pathology and Genetics Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
3
Department of Cancer Biology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
4
Department of Surgery, Hiratsuka Kyosai Hospital, Hiratsuka 254-8502, Japan
5
Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
6
Department of Pathology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
7
Department of Pathology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen’s Hospital, Yokohama 221-0855, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2022, 14(3), 579; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030579
Submission received: 3 December 2021 / Revised: 18 January 2022 / Accepted: 20 January 2022 / Published: 24 January 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is a highly aggressive thyroid tumor with a poor prognosis. There are limited choices for the effective treatment of this type of carcinoma. Whether the targets of antibody–drug conjugates are expressed in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma remains unclear. Therefore, we examined expression rates of the following antibody–drug conjugate targets using the tissue microarrays of anaplastic thyroid carcinomas: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, nectin-4, trophoblast cell surface antigen 2, glycoprotein non-metastatic B, and B7-H3. We found that glycoprotein non-metastatic B and B7-H3 were expressed in most anaplastic thyroid carcinoma tissues. Trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 and nectin-4 were expressed in 65% and 59% of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma tissues, respectively. Trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 was high expressed in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma undifferentiated from papillary thyroid carcinoma. In contrast, nectin-4 expression was high in patients with de novo anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. These cell membrane proteins are potential therapeutic targets for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma.

Abstract

Background: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a highly aggressive thyroid tumor with a poor prognosis. However, there are limited choices for ATC treatment. Recently, the effectiveness of antibody–drug conjugates has been demonstrated in various carcinomas. Whether the targets of antibody–drug conjugates are expressed in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma remains unclear. Methods: Fifty-four patients with ATC were enrolled in this study. Tissue microarrays were constructed using the archives of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. All sections were stained with the following antibody–drug conjugate targets: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), nectin-4, trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2), glycoprotein non-metastatic B (GPNMB), and B7-H3. Results: HER2 was negative in all tissues, whereas GPNMB and B7-H3 were expressed in most ATC tissues. TROP-2 and nectin-4 were expressed in 65% and 59% of ATC tissues, respectively. TROP-2 was expressed at significantly higher levels in ATC undifferentiated from papillary thyroid carcinoma than in ATC undifferentiated from follicular thyroid carcinoma and de novo ATC. In contrast, nectin-4 expression was markedly higher in patients with de novo ATC than in those with papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Conclusions: TROP-2 and nectin-4 are potential therapeutic targets for ATC undifferentiated from papillary thyroid carcinoma and de novo ATC, respectively. GPNMB and B7-H3 potential for treating all types of ATC.

1. Introduction

Although it is a rare form of thyroid cancer, accounting for approximately 1–2% of all thyroid cancers, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a particularly aggressive type of carcinoma. The median survival time of patients with ATC is only 3–6 months after diagnosis [1].
Primary ATC is an ATC without a pre-existing history of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Secondary ATC is an ATC with a DTC history or coexisting DTC components at the time of diagnosis. DTC converted to ATC has been confirmed by the next-generation sequencing of cancer-associated gene panels using serial biopsies [2,3,4]. There are four genetically distinct types of ATC: v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutation cluster, neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog mutation cluster, phosphatase and tensin homolog/neurofibromin 1/RB transcriptional corepressor 1 mutation cluster, and loss-of-function in the CDKN2A and CDKN2B clusters. These clusters have the genetic features of papillary carcinoma or follicular carcinoma, supporting the hypothesis of anaplastic transformation through the acquisition of additional oncogenic alterations [5].
Recently, BRAF and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors have shown a high response rate in BRAF V600E-mutated ATC [6]. However, we still have no other practical option for treating ATC, regardless of BRAF mutation status.
Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are compound-binding antibodies with cytotoxic low-molecular-weight drugs via chemical linkers; they expand the repertoire of oncology therapeutics. ADCs bind to the antigen on the cell membrane surface and are internalized by endocytosis. The linker is then cleaved and releases the drug into the target tumor cells. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, which has an antibody against the cluster of differentiation (CD) 33, was the first ADC approved for acute myeloid leukemia. In solid cancer, ADCs targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), such as trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan, showed favorable outcomes in HER2-positive breast or gastric cancer [7,8,9].
In a recent study, sacituzumab govitecan, an ADC comprising an antibody targeting the human trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2), extended progression-free and overall survival compared to single-agent chemotherapy among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [10]. Enfortumab vedotin, an ADC directed against nectin-4, prolonged patients’ survival compared to standard chemotherapy treatments in patients with urothelial carcinoma [11]. In addition, some clinical trials of ADCs targeting proteins on cell membranes, such as glycoprotein non-metastatic B (GPNMB) and B7-H3, are currently in progress [12,13]. TROP-2 was detected in 50% of 24 ATC cases [14], and HER2 expression has been rarely observed in ATC cases [15,16]. However, no studies have evaluated the expression of other ADC target proteins, such as nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 in ATCs.
In this study, we evaluated the expression levels of HER2, TROP-2, nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 by immunostaining in ATC patient tissues. We selected ADC targeting proteins whose clinical trials are progressing in Phase I/II or higher. We found that the expression of the proteins differs depending on the pathological types of ATC progression and that ADCs are viable candidates for ATC treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Samples

A total of 54 patients with ATC who were treated at Kanagawa Cancer Center from 1990 to 2009 were enrolled in this study. The study design was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kanagawa Cancer Center (approval number, 19–34).
Stage classification was performed according to the 8th edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control. Pathological types were divided into three types based on the origin of the tumor: papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC), and de novo ATC. ATC coexisting with PTC was defined as PTC-origin type, ATC coexisting with FTC as FTC-origin type, and ATC where DTC does not coexist as de novo type.
Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Three cores of tumor tissue and a core of non-neoplastic thyroid tissue, if available, were selected, and the designed tumor zone on each block was punched in a 4 mm diameter circle. TMA blocks were cut into 4 μm thick sections and subjected to the usual immunohistochemistry protocol. In this study, we evaluated the cores that contained ATC tissue. All sections were stained with HER2 (mouse monoclonal antibody, Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan, 413431, 1/50 dilution), nectin-4 (rabbit monoclonal antibody, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab192033, 1/3000 dilution), TROP-2 (mouse monoclonal antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA, sc376181, 1/50 dilution), GPNMB (mouse monoclonal antibody, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, 66926, 1/1000 dilution), and B7-H3 (mouse monoclonal antibody, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, 66481, 1/2500 dilution). The exposed antigen was detected using Histofine simple stain MAX PO (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan). The reaction was identified with DAB (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) and counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (FUJiFILM, Osaka, Japan)

2.2. Evaluation of Immunohistochemical Staining

Evaluation of immunohistochemistry was performed based on the Allred score [17,18,19,20,21,22]. We graded the intensity score (IS) to classify the specimens into four grades as follows: 0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong (Figure 1). Next, the proportion score (PS) was determined as follows: 0, 0%; 1, <1%; 2, 1–10%; 3, 11–33%; 4, 34–66%; and 5, 67–100%. The total score (TS) was calculated as the sum of IS and PS. We assigned a rating of positive when the TS was 3 or higher. Immunohistochemical scoring was evaluated by an experienced pathologist who was blinded to the clinical parameters.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The Fisher’s exact test was employed to evaluate the correlations with the clinical characteristics. Overall survival was tested using log-rank tests. The distribution of time-to-event endpoints for overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The TS of TROP-2 and nectin-4 were compared among the three groups (PTC-origin type, FTC-origin type, and de novo type) using Kruskal–Wallis/Steel–Dwass tests. An outcome of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

A total of 54 patients with ATC who were treated at the Kanagawa Cancer Center between 1990 and 2009 were enrolled in this study. The patients had a median age of 69 (range, 47–90) years; the clinical stages classified by the AJCC staging system 8th edition included stage IVA (5.5%), IVB (55.5%), and IVC (39%). The prognostic index (PI) is based on the number of unfavorable characteristics, including acute symptoms, large tumors, distant metastasis, and leukocytosis [23]. In all, 38% of the patients had a PI score of 0 or 1, and 62% had a PI score of 2, 3, or 4. The median overall survival time was 176 days, and the number of patients who survived at 3 years was only five. The pathological types divided by the origin of the tumor included the PTC-origin type (37%), FTC-origin type (17%), and de novo type (46%). Detailed patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

3.2. Distribution of the Immunohistochemical Total Score

We evaluated the TS of HER2, TROP-2, nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 using the IS and PS, as described in the Methods section. HER2 was found to be negative in all tissues (Figure 1A), as previously reported [15,16]. TROP-2 and B7-H3 were predominantly stained on the cell membrane, while nectin-4 and GPNMB were stained in the cytoplasm (Figure 1B). Both GPNMB and B7-H3 were expressed in most ATC tissues. In contrast, both TROP-2 and nectin-4 were expressed in 65% and 59% of ATC tissues, respectively (Figure 2). In normal thyroid tissues, the TS-positive rates of TROP-2, nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 were 14%, 50%, 7%, and 14%, respectively. No moderate or strong staining with an IS of 2 or 3 was observed in all normal tissues (Figure 3).

3.3. The Total Score of Human Trophoblast Cell Surface Antigen 2 and nectin-4 Is Associated with Histological Types

We tested whether TROP-2 and nectin-4 expressions were associated with the clinical course. The overall survival rate was not significantly different between the negative and positive groups, neither in TROP-2 (median, 146 days vs. 183 days; p = 0.409) nor in nectin-4 (median, 207.5 days vs. 159.0 days; p = 0.763, Figure 4). We examined this cohort in a similar manner with a median TS cutoff, but there was also no significant difference. Overall survival was examined with a median TS cutoff in GPNMB and B7-H3. Patients with low GPNMB expression had significantly poorer prognoses than those with high expression (median, 144 days vs. 296 days; p = 0.0231, Figure 5). However, it was confirmed that there was a significant difference in overall survival rates at the AJCC stage and the prognostic index, which are known prognostic factors (Figure 6). Next, we evaluated the correlations of the TROP-2, nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 expressions with various clinical factors. The AJCC Stage in TROP-2 and the rapid growth in nectin-4 showed a significant difference (Table 2).
Regarding the histological types, the TS of TROP-2 was significantly higher in the PTC-origin type group than in the FTC-origin type and de novo type. In contrast, the TS of nectin-4 was markedly higher in the de novo type than in the PTC-origin and FTC-origin types. The TS of B7-H3 was not different in any histological type. Although the TS of GPNMB was significantly higher in the FTC-origin group than in the de novo group, both had a median TS of 6 (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

ATC is an undifferentiated tumor of the thyroid follicular epithelium, which is highly aggressive and has a poor prognosis. Despite numerous attempts to explore new therapeutic targets associated with ATC’s prognosis, no effective treatment has been found to date. In the present study, we investigated whether ADC target protein expression in ATC may be a novel treatment for ATC.
We evaluated the correlations of the TROP-2, nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 expressions with various clinical factors, but many factors showed no significant differences. Although the AJCC stage in TROP-2 and the rapid growth in nectin-4 showed significant differences, there were no significant differences in overall survival rates. The positivity rates of TROP-2 were 95% in 20 PTC-origin ATC cases, 33% in 9 FTC-origin ATC cases, and 52% in 25 de novo ATC cases. The TS of TROP-2 was significantly high in the PTC-origin type. In contrast, the nectin-4 expression rates were 45% in 20 PTC-origin ATC cases, 22% in 9 FTC-origin ATC cases, and 84% in 25 de novo ATC cases. The TS of nectin-4 was significantly high in de novo ATC cases. Thus, TROP-2 and nectin-4 expressions are related to the histological types. These results suggest that TROP-2-targeted therapy is expected in PTC-origin ATC cases, and nectin-4 targeted therapy is expected in de novo ATC cases. While the TS of B7-H3 was not different in any histological types, the TS of GPNMB was significantly higher in the FTC-origin group than in the de novo group. Since both had a median TS of 6, this has little clinical significance.
When evaluating the expression of cell membrane proteins by immunohistochemistry staining, each report has a different standard for positivity. We defined expressions as positive when the TS was 3 or higher in order to detect ATCs which express the target proteins and are candidates for ADCs. We showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival levels between TROP2 and nectin-4 when the cutoff of the TS is defined as 3 or higher. However, there was also no significant difference in overall survival with a median TS cutoff. Overall survival was examined with a median TS cutoff in GPNMB and B7-H3. Patients with a low GPNMB expression had significantly poorer prognoses than those with a high expression. Although GPNMB could be a prognostic factor, it should be noted that this result is highly influenced by a group whose TS is 6, since this group accounts for 56% of GPNMB. In terms of the staining on cell membranes, TROP-2 and B7-H3 were strongly stained on cell membranes compared to nectin-4 and GPNMB. Although TROP-2 and B7-H3 are the ideal candidates for ADC therapy, further study on the effectiveness of ADC is still needed. Nectin-4 and GPNMB are also potential therapeutic targets because some reports showed that ADCs are effective even when the expression of the target protein is low [8].
We confirmed that HER2 expression was not observed in 54 patients with ATC, as previously reported [15,16]. In contrast, B7-H3 and GPNMB expressions were positive in 98% of 54 patients with ATC. Thus, B7-H3 and GPNMB are potential therapeutic targets in patients with ATC.
B7-H3, also known as CD276, is a member of the B7 family of immunomodulatory molecules [24,25]. In addition, GPNMB, also referred to as osteoactivin, is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is associated with increased invasion and metastasis, decreased apoptosis, and enhanced angiogenesis [26]. Overexpression of B7-H3 and GPNMB is associated with the risk of recurrence and of shorter overall survival [27,28,29,30,31]. B7-H3 and GPNMB are overexpressed in many solid cancers, but their protein expressions are limited in normal tissues [31,32,33,34,35].
The present study also showed immunohistochemistry staining of TROP-2, nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 is weaker in normal thyroid tissues than in ATC tissues. This may allow for ADC treatment with limited side effects. In BRAF mutant melanomas, GPNMB is upregulated after BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy [36]. This suggests that GPNMB is a candidate target in BRAF mutant ATC after BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy.
In this study, we demonstrated that TROP-2-, nectin-4-, B7-H3-, and GPNMB-related ADCs are potential therapeutic options for ATC.

5. Conclusions

TROP-2 and nectin-4 are potential therapeutic targets for ATC undifferentiated from papillary thyroid carcinoma and de novo ATC, respectively. GPNMB and B7-H3 potential for treating all types of ATC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.T., N.S. (Nao Saito) and D.H.; methodology, A.M., D.M. and K.S.; pathological evaluation, S.S. and Y.O.; preparation of tissue samples, H.N., N.S. (Nobuyasu Suganuma) and H.H.; data curation, N.S. (Nao Saito) and H.I.; writing—original draft preparation, S.T.; writing—review and editing, Y.M. and D.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Project for Cancer Research and Therapeutic Evolution (P-CREATE) JP20cm0106201 and JSPS KAKENHI (JP 21K07209) to D.H., JSPS (JP 19K09087) to No.S., Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital—Research Institute Joint Study to S.T., S.S., D.M., H.I., Y.M. and D.H.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kanagawa Cancer Center (protocol code: 2019—34, date of approval: 3 July 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mitsuyo Yoshihara and Ryuko Shibata for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sugitani, I.; Miyauchi, A.; Sugino, K.; Okamoto, T.; Yoshida, A.; Suzuki, S. Prognostic Factors and Treatment Outcomes for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: ATC Research Consortium of Japan Cohort Study of 677 Patients. World J. Surg. 2012, 36, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McIver, B.; Hay, I.; Giuffrida, D.F.; Dvorak, C.E.; Grant, C.S.; Thompson, G.B.; van Heerden, J.A.; Goellner, J.R. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: A 50-year experience at a single institution. Surgery 2001, 130, 1028–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Venkatesh, Y.S.; Ordonez, N.G.; Schultz, P.N.; Hickey, R.C.; Goepfert, H.; Samaan, N.A. Anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid. A clini-copathologic study of 121 cases. Cancer 1990, 66, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moore, J.H., Jr.; Bacharach, B.; Choi, H.Y. Anaplastic transformation of metastatic follicular carcinoma of the thyroid. J. Surg. Oncol. 1985, 29, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pozdeyev, N.; Gay, L.M.; Sokol, E.S.; Hartmaier, R.; Deaver, K.E.; Davis, S.; French, J.D.; Borre, P.V.; LaBarbera, D.V.; Tan, A.C.; et al. Genetic Analysis of 779 Advanced Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 3059–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Subbiah, V.; Kreitman, R.J.; Wainberg, Z.A.; Cho, J.Y.; Schellens, J.H.M.; Soria, J.C.; Wen, P.Y.; Zielinski, C.; Cabanillas, M.E.; Urbanowitz, G.; et al. Dabrafenib and Trametinib Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic BRAF V600–Mutant Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Verma, S.; Miles, D.; Gianni, L.; Krop, I.E.; Welslau, M.; Baselga, J.; Pegram, M.; Oh, D.-Y.; Diéras, V.; Guardino, E.; et al. Trastuzumab Emtansine for HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Modi, S.; Saura, C.; Yamashita, T.; Park, Y.H.; Kim, S.-B.; Tamura, K.; Andre, F.; Iwata, H.; Ito, Y.; Tsurutani, J.; et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shitara, K.; Bang, Y.-J.; Iwasa, S.; Sugimoto, N.; Ryu, M.-H.; Sakai, D.; Chung, H.-C.; Kawakami, H.; Yabusaki, H.; Lee, J.; et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2419–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bardia, A.; Hurvitz, S.A.; Tolaney, S.M.; Loirat, D.; Punie, K.; Oliveira, M.; Brufsky, A.; Sardesai, S.D.; Kalinsky, K.; Zelnak, A.B.; et al. Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1529–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Powles, T.; Rosenberg, J.E.; Sonpavde, G.P.; Loriot, Y.; Durán, I.; Lee, J.-L.; Matsubara, N.; Vulsteke, C.; Castellano, D.; Wu, C.; et al. Enfortumab Vedotin in Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1125–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Scribner, J.A.; Brown, J.G.; Son, T.; Chiechi, M.; Li, P.; Sharma, S.; Li, H.; De Costa, A.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. Preclinical Development of MGC018, a Duocarmycin-based Antibody–drug Conjugate Targeting B7-H3 for Solid Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2020, 19, 2235–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ott, P.A.; Pavlick, A.C.; Johnson, D.B.; Hart, L.L.; Infante, J.R.; Luke, J.J.; Lutzky, J.; Rothschild, N.E.; Spitler, L.E.; Cowey, C.E.; et al. A phase 2 study of glembatumumab vedotin, an anti-body-drug conjugate targeting glycoprotein NMB, in patients with advanced melanoma. Cancer 2019, 125, 1113–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Seok, J.Y.; Astvatsaturyan, K.; De Peralta-Venturina, M.; Lai, J.; Fan, X. TROP-2, 5hmC, and IDH1 Expression in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2021, 29, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Elliott, D.D.; Sherman, S.I.; Busaidy, N.L.; Williams, M.D.; Santarpia, L.; Clayman, G.L.; El-Naggar, A.K. Growth factor receptors expression in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Potential markers for therapeutic stratification. Hum. Pathol. 2008, 39, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wiseman, S.M.; Masoudi, H.; Niblock, P.; Turbin, D.; Rajput, A.; Hay, J.; Bugis, S.; Filipenko, D.; Huntsman, D.; Gilks, B. Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: Expression Profile of Targets for Therapy Offers New Insights for Disease Treatment. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007, 14, 719–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Allred, D.C.; Clark, G.M.; Elledge, R.; Fuqua, S.A.W.; Brown, R.W.; Chamness, G.C.; Osborne, C.K.; McGuire, W.L. Association of p53 Protein Expression With Tumor Cell Proliferation Rate and Clinical Outcome in Node-Negative Breast Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993, 85, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Harvey, J.M.; Clark, G.M.; Osborne, C.K.; Allred, D.C. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the lig-and-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999, 17, 1474–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hasebe, T.; Iwasaki, M.; Akashi-Tanaka, S.; Hojo, T.; Shibata, T.; Sasajima, Y.; Kinoshita, T.; Tsuda, H. p53 expression in tumor-stromal fibroblasts forming and not forming fibrotic foci in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Mod. Pathol. 2010, 23, 662–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mohsin, S.K.; Weiss, H.; Havighurst, T.; Clark, G.M.; Berardo, M.; Roanh, L.D.; To, T.V.; Zho, Q.; Love, R.R.; Allred, D.C. Progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in breast cancer: A validation study. Mod. Pathol. 2004, 17, 1545–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Reis-Filho, J.S.; Savage, K.; Lambros, M.B.; James, M.; Steele, D.; Jones, R.L.; Dowsett, M. Cyclin D1 protein overexpression and CCND1 am-plification in breast carcinomas: An immunohistochemical and chromogenic in situ hybridisation analysis. Mod. Pathol. 2006, 19, 999–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Shahid, M.; George, T.B.; Saller, J.; Haija, M.; Sayegh, Z.; Boulware, D.; Strosberg, J.; Chakrabarti, R.; Coppola, D. FGD4 (Frabin) Overexpression in Pancreatic Neuroen-docrine Neoplasms. Pancreas 2019, 48, 1307–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sugitani, I.; Kasai, N.; Fujimoto, Y.; Yanagisawa, A. Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategy for Anaplastic Carcinoma of the Thyroid. World J. Surg. 2001, 25, 617–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pardoll, D.M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zang, X.; Allison, J. The B7 Family and Cancer Therapy: Costimulation and Coinhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13 Pt 1, 5271–5279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Rose, A.; Pepin, F.; Russo, C.; Khalil, J.E.A.; Hallett, M.; Siegel, P.M. Osteoactivin Promotes Breast Cancer Metastasis to Bone. Mol. Cancer Res. 2007, 5, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Maeda, N.; Yoshimura, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Kuramasu, A.; Inoue, M.; Suzuki, N.; Watanabe, Y.; Maeda, Y.; Kamei, R.; Tsunedomi, R.; et al. Expression of B7-H3, a Potential Factor of Tumor Immune Evasion in Combination with the Number of Regulatory T Cells, Affects Against Recurrence-Free Survival in Breast Cancer Patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 21 (Suppl. 4), 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, J.; Chong, K.K.; Nakamura, Y.; Nguyen, L.; Huang, S.K.; Kuo, C.; Zhang, W.; Yu, H.; Morton, D.L.; Hoon, D.S. B7-H3 Associated with Tumor Progression and Epigenetic Regulatory Activity in Cutaneous Melanoma. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 2050–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rose, A.; Grosset, A.-A.; Dong, Z.; Russo, C.; Macdonald, P.A.; Bertos, N.R.; St-Pierre, Y.; Simantov, R.; Hallett, M.; Park, M.; et al. Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic B Is an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Recurrence and a Novel Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 2147–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Qin, C.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, C.; Xu, T. Glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B as a predictive prognostic factor in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma following radical nephrectomy. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 9, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kuan, C.T.; Wakiya, K.; Dowell, J.M.; Herndon, J.E.; Reardon, D.A., 2nd; Graner, M.W.; Riggins, G.J.; Wikstrand, C.J.; Bigner, D.D. Glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B, a potential molecular therapeutic target in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12 Pt 1, 1970–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Loo, D.; Alderson, R.F.; Chen, F.Z.; Huang, L.; Zhang, W.; Gorlatov, S.; Burke, S.; Ciccarone, V.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; et al. Development of an Fc-Enhanced Anti–B7-H3 Monoclonal Antibody with Potent Antitumor Activity. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 3834–3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Xu, H.; Cheung, I.Y.; Guo, H.-F.; Cheung, N.-K.V. MicroRNA miR-29 Modulates Expression of Immunoinhibitory Molecule B7-H3: Potential Implications for Immune Based Therapy of Human Solid Tumors. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6275–6281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kolb, E.A.; Gorlick, R.; Ms, C.A.B.; Hawthorne, T.; Kurmasheva, R.T.; Houghton, P.J.; Smith, M.A. Initial testing (stage 1) of glembatumumab vedotin (CDX-011) by the pediatric preclinical testing program. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2014, 61, 1816–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Hanemaaijer, S.H.; van Gijn, S.E.; Oosting, S.F.; Plaat, B.E.C.; Moek, K.L.; Schuuring, E.M.; van der Laan, B.F.; Roodenburg, J.L.; van Vugt, M.A.; van der Vegt, B.; et al. Data-Driven prioritisation of anti-body-drug conjugate targets in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2018, 80, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rose, A.; Annis, M.G.; Frederick, D.T.; Biondini, M.; Dong, Z.; Kwong, L.; Chin, L.; Keler, T.; Hawthorne, T.; Watson, I.; et al. MAPK Pathway Inhibitors Sensitize BRAF-Mutant Melanoma to an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting GPNMB. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 6088–6098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The immunohistochemistry staining examples of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), trophoblast cell surface antigen 2, nectin-4, glycoprotein non-metastatic B, and B7-H3. Staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1+ (weakly positive), 2+ (moderate), and 3+ (strongly positive). HER2 expression was negative in all anaplastic thyroid carcinoma samples ((A) scale bar represents 100 μm). The higher magnification showed that TROP-2 and B7-H3 were strongly stained on the cell membrane compared to nectin-4 and GPNMB ((B) scale bar represents 50 μm).
Figure 1. The immunohistochemistry staining examples of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), trophoblast cell surface antigen 2, nectin-4, glycoprotein non-metastatic B, and B7-H3. Staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1+ (weakly positive), 2+ (moderate), and 3+ (strongly positive). HER2 expression was negative in all anaplastic thyroid carcinoma samples ((A) scale bar represents 100 μm). The higher magnification showed that TROP-2 and B7-H3 were strongly stained on the cell membrane compared to nectin-4 and GPNMB ((B) scale bar represents 50 μm).
Cancers 14 00579 g001
Figure 2. The immunohistochemistry total score distributions of trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) (A), nectin-4 (B), glycoprotein non-metastatic B (GPNMB) (C), and B7-H3 (D) in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma tissues. We rated them positive when the total score was 3 or higher. Each percentage of positive in the total score was as follows: HER2 (0%), TROP-2 (65%), nectin-4 (59%), GPNMB (98%), and B7-H3 (98%).
Figure 2. The immunohistochemistry total score distributions of trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) (A), nectin-4 (B), glycoprotein non-metastatic B (GPNMB) (C), and B7-H3 (D) in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma tissues. We rated them positive when the total score was 3 or higher. Each percentage of positive in the total score was as follows: HER2 (0%), TROP-2 (65%), nectin-4 (59%), GPNMB (98%), and B7-H3 (98%).
Cancers 14 00579 g002
Figure 3. The immunohistochemistry total score distribution of trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) (A), nectin-4 (B), glycoprotein non-metastatic B (GPNMB) (C), and B7-H3 (D) in normal thyroid tissues. We rated them positive when the total score was 3 or higher. Each percentage of positive in the total score was as follows: TROP-2 (14%), nectin-4 (50%), GPNMB (7%), and B7-H3 (14%). No moderate or strong staining, whose intensity score (IS) was 2 or 3, was observed in all normal tissues (E).
Figure 3. The immunohistochemistry total score distribution of trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) (A), nectin-4 (B), glycoprotein non-metastatic B (GPNMB) (C), and B7-H3 (D) in normal thyroid tissues. We rated them positive when the total score was 3 or higher. Each percentage of positive in the total score was as follows: TROP-2 (14%), nectin-4 (50%), GPNMB (7%), and B7-H3 (14%). No moderate or strong staining, whose intensity score (IS) was 2 or 3, was observed in all normal tissues (E).
Cancers 14 00579 g003aCancers 14 00579 g003b
Figure 4. Overall survival was not significantly different between the negative and positive groups, neither in trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (median, 146 days vs. 183 days; p = 0.409 (A)) nor in nectin-4 (median, 207.5 days vs. 159.0 days; p = 0.763 (B)).
Figure 4. Overall survival was not significantly different between the negative and positive groups, neither in trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (median, 146 days vs. 183 days; p = 0.409 (A)) nor in nectin-4 (median, 207.5 days vs. 159.0 days; p = 0.763 (B)).
Cancers 14 00579 g004
Figure 5. Overall survival was not significantly different between the negative and positive groups, neither in trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 even when the cutoff was set to median total score (median, 129.0 days vs. 201.5 days; p = 0.122 (A)) nor in nectin-4 (median, 179.5 days vs. 174.5 days; p = 0.696 (B)). Patients with low GPNMB expression had significantly poorer prognoses than those with high expression when the cutoff was set to median total score (median, 144 days vs. 296 days; p = 0.0231, (C)), while there was no significant difference in B7-H3 expression (median, 127 days vs. 201.5 days; p = 0.328 (D)).
Figure 5. Overall survival was not significantly different between the negative and positive groups, neither in trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 even when the cutoff was set to median total score (median, 129.0 days vs. 201.5 days; p = 0.122 (A)) nor in nectin-4 (median, 179.5 days vs. 174.5 days; p = 0.696 (B)). Patients with low GPNMB expression had significantly poorer prognoses than those with high expression when the cutoff was set to median total score (median, 144 days vs. 296 days; p = 0.0231, (C)), while there was no significant difference in B7-H3 expression (median, 127 days vs. 201.5 days; p = 0.328 (D)).
Cancers 14 00579 g005
Figure 6. Overall survival was significantly different in known prognostic factors such as the prognostic index (median, 231 days vs. 49 days; p < 0.01 (A)) or the AJCC stage (median, 293 days vs. 219 days vs. 74 days; p < 0.01 (B)).
Figure 6. Overall survival was significantly different in known prognostic factors such as the prognostic index (median, 231 days vs. 49 days; p < 0.01 (A)) or the AJCC stage (median, 293 days vs. 219 days vs. 74 days; p < 0.01 (B)).
Cancers 14 00579 g006
Figure 7. Pathological types are related to the expression of trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) and nectin-4. The total score of TROP-2 was significantly higher in the papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC)-origin type group than the follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC)-origin type and de novo type groups (A). The total score of nectin-4 was significantly higher in the de novo type than in the PTC-origin and FTC-origin types (B). Although the total score of GPNMB was significantly higher in the FTC-origin group than in the de novo group, both had a median total score of 6 (C). The total score of B7-H3 was not different in any histological type (D); NS, not significant. * p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test).
Figure 7. Pathological types are related to the expression of trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) and nectin-4. The total score of TROP-2 was significantly higher in the papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC)-origin type group than the follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC)-origin type and de novo type groups (A). The total score of nectin-4 was significantly higher in the de novo type than in the PTC-origin and FTC-origin types (B). Although the total score of GPNMB was significantly higher in the FTC-origin group than in the de novo group, both had a median total score of 6 (C). The total score of B7-H3 was not different in any histological type (D); NS, not significant. * p < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test).
Cancers 14 00579 g007aCancers 14 00579 g007b
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Characteristics Number of Patients
SexMale27
Female27
AgeMedian69 (47–90)
AJCC stage *IVA3
IVB30
IVC21
Tumor size<50 mm13
≥50 mm41
Rapid growthAbsent37
Present17
White blood cell count<10,000/mm337
≥10,000/mm317
Surgical curativityCurative18
Non-curative36
Prognostic index **0, 121
2, 3, 433
Pathological type ***PTC-origin type20
FTC-origin type9
De novo type25
* The American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system, 8th edition. ** The prognostic index is based on the number of the four unfavorable characteristics the patient possessed: acute symptoms, large tumor (≥50 mm), distant metastasis, and leukocytosis (white blood cell count ≥10,000/mm3). *** Pathological types are divided into three types according to the origin of tumor. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) coexisting with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is defined as PTC-origin type, ATC coexisting with follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) as FTC-origin type, and ATC where DTC does not coexist as de novo type.
Table 2. Correlation between clinical characteristics and ADC targets expression.
Table 2. Correlation between clinical characteristics and ADC targets expression.
Number of Patients
TROP2Nectin-4Total Score of GPNMBTotal Score of B7-H3
CharacteristicsNegativePositivep ValueNegativePositivep Value0–67, 8p Value0–78p Value
Gender
 Male1116NS1116NS216NS1017NS
 Female819 1118 207 621
Age
 <701116NS918NS225NS4230.0352
 ≥70819 1314 198 1215
AJCC Stage *
 ⅣA,B726<0.011617NS249NS924NS
 ⅣC129 615 174 714
Tumor size
 <50 mm49NS85NS94NS310NS
 ≥50 mm1526 1427 329 1328
Rapid growth
 Absent1522NS2017<0.012710NS1126NS
 Present413 215 143 512
WBC
 <10,000/mm31027NS1621NS2611NS1126NS
 ≥10,000/mm398 611 152 512
Prognostic Index
 0, 1615NS129NS138NS615NS
 2, 3, 41320 1023 285 1023
* The American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system, 8th edition; NS, not significant. WBC, White blood cell count.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Toda, S.; Sato, S.; Saito, N.; Sekihara, K.; Matsui, A.; Murayama, D.; Nakayama, H.; Suganuma, N.; Okubo, Y.; Hayashi, H.; et al. TROP-2, Nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 Are Potentially Therapeutic Targets for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers 2022, 14, 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030579

AMA Style

Toda S, Sato S, Saito N, Sekihara K, Matsui A, Murayama D, Nakayama H, Suganuma N, Okubo Y, Hayashi H, et al. TROP-2, Nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 Are Potentially Therapeutic Targets for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers. 2022; 14(3):579. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Toda, Soji, Shinya Sato, Nao Saito, Kazumasa Sekihara, Ai Matsui, Daisuke Murayama, Hirotaka Nakayama, Nobuyasu Suganuma, Yoichiro Okubo, Hiroyuki Hayashi, and et al. 2022. "TROP-2, Nectin-4, GPNMB, and B7-H3 Are Potentially Therapeutic Targets for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma" Cancers 14, no. 3: 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop