Next Article in Journal
Correction: Hu, W., et al. Targeting Dopamine Receptor D2 by Imipridone Suppresses Uterine Serous Cancer Malignant Phenotype. Cancers 2020, 12, 2436
Next Article in Special Issue
Night Work and Breast Cancer Risk in Nurses: Multifactorial Risk Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Activation of the S100A7/RAGE Pathway by IGF-1 Contributes to Angiogenesis in Breast Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Environmental Carcinogens and Cancer Risk

School of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, 150 E. 10th Street, Claremont, CA 91711, USA
Cancers 2021, 13(4), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040622
Submission received: 1 February 2021 / Accepted: 3 February 2021 / Published: 4 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Carcinogens and Cancer Risk)
The year 2022 will mark the 60th anniversary of the 1962 publication of Rachel Carson’s seminar work Silent Spring [1], which questioned the judiciousness of widespread use of chemical pesticides in the environment, initiating the modern environmental movement that still endures today. In the United States, the 1970s saw the first Earth Day and the passage of many of our important environmental protection laws, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act, as well as the establishment of federal agencies with responsibilities for environmental health, namely the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA). The significance of the potential impacts of environmental sources, including polluted air and water, hazardous waste, and unsafe workplaces, on human health was recognized through these national laws, along with the responsibilities delegated to corresponding regulatory agencies [2].
About one-fifth of people worldwide and one-third of people in industrialized countries will be diagnosed with cancer during their lifetimes [3]. Environmental carcinogens encompass a broad range of chemical, biological, and physical agents, as well as some lifestyle factors. Despite small relative risks of cancer from exposure to environmental carcinogens, attributable risks have the potential to be large because of the high prevalence of exposure [4]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 20% of cancers worldwide are attributable to environmental risks, predominantly air pollution, management of chemicals, radiation, and workers’ protection [5]. The cancer burden from environmental agents varies by the degree of industrialization of the country [6]. A unifying characteristic of these agents is the involuntary nature of their exposure from environmental and occupational settings.
The EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program created in 1985 identifies and characterizes human health hazards associated with chemicals found in the environment. To date, the IRIS’s weight-of-evidence approach has identified over 150 of such chemicals as carcinogenic, likely to be carcinogenic, or suggestive evidence of carcinogenic potential [7]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) through its monographs also evaluates potential environmental carcinogens. Since 1971, the IARC has evaluated more than 1000 agents through the monographs, and more than 500 have been identified as carcinogenic, probably carcinogenic, or possibly carcinogenic to humans [8]. Necessary for both these syntheses are primary studies using humans and experimental models.
Today, the legacy of the historical actions from past decades is threatened. The growing use of environmental chemicals, the changing climate, and the waxing and waning of support for environmental protections by political administrations all jeopardize the progress we have achieved. Simply considering the tens of thousands of chemicals in use across the world, substantial work remains to understand the potential cancer risk to humans as well as the biological mechanisms of action. Therefore, the need for research is greater than ever.

References

  1. Carson, R. 1907–1964; Silent Spring; Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA, USA, 2002; Available online: https://www.rachelcarson.org/ (accessed on 27 January 2021).
  2. The Origins of EPA. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/history/origins-epa. (accessed on 27 January 2021).
  3. IARC. World Cancer Report; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Lyon, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boffetta, P.; Nyberg, F. Contribution of environmental factors to cancer risk. Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Prüss-Üstün, A.; Wolf, J.; Corvalán, C.F.; Bos, R.V.; Neira, M.P. Preventing Disease through Healthy Environments: A Global Assessment of the Burden of Disease from Environmental Risks; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schottenfeld, D.; Beebe-Dimmer, J.L.; Buffler, P.A.; Omenn, G.S. Current perspective on the global and United States cancer burden attributable to lifestyle and environmental risk factors. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2013, 34, 97–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. US EPA Integrated Risk Information System. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/iris (accessed on 27 January 2021).
  8. IARC. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans. Available online: https://monographs.iarc.who.int/home/iarc-monographs-general-information/ (accessed on 27 January 2021).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gatto, N.M. Environmental Carcinogens and Cancer Risk. Cancers 2021, 13, 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040622

AMA Style

Gatto NM. Environmental Carcinogens and Cancer Risk. Cancers. 2021; 13(4):622. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040622

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gatto, Nicole M. 2021. "Environmental Carcinogens and Cancer Risk" Cancers 13, no. 4: 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040622

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop