Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Trap Characterization Techniques for GaN-Based HEMTs: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Exploring the Potential of GaN-Based Power HEMTs with Coherent Channel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Power Electronics Revolutionized: A Comprehensive Analysis of Emerging Wide and Ultrawide Bandgap Devices

by
S M Sajjad Hossain Rafin
1,
Roni Ahmed
2,
Md. Asadul Haque
3,
Md. Kamal Hossain
3,
Md. Asikul Haque
3 and
Osama A. Mohammed
1,*
1
Energy Systems Research Laboratory, Department of ECE, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33174, USA
2
Department of ECE, Presidency University, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
3
Department of EEE, Northern University Bangladesh, Dhaka 1230, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2023, 14(11), 2045; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14112045
Submission received: 6 October 2023 / Revised: 25 October 2023 / Accepted: 27 October 2023 / Published: 31 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advancements in Semiconductor Materials, Devices, and Systems)

Abstract

:
This article provides a comprehensive review of wide and ultrawide bandgap power electronic semiconductor devices, comparing silicon (Si), silicon carbide (SiC), gallium nitride (GaN), and the emerging device diamond technology. Key parameters examined include bandgap, critical electric field, electron mobility, voltage/current ratings, switching frequency, and device packaging. The historical evolution of each material is traced from early research devices to current commercial offerings. Significant focus is given to SiC and GaN as they are now actively competing with Si devices in the market, enabled by their higher bandgaps. The paper details advancements in material growth, device architectures, reliability, and manufacturing that have allowed SiC and GaN adoption in electric vehicles, renewable energy, aerospace, and other applications requiring high power density, efficiency, and frequency operation. Performance enhancements over Si are quantified. However, the challenges associated with the advancements of these devices are also elaborately described: material availability, thermal management, gate drive design, electrical insulation, and electromagnetic interference. Alongside the cost reduction through improved manufacturing, material availability, thermal management, gate drive design, electrical insulation, and electromagnetic interference are critical hurdles of this technology. The review analyzes these issues and emerging solutions using advanced packaging, circuit integration, novel cooling techniques, and modeling. Overall, the manuscript provides a timely, rigorous examination of the state of the art in wide bandgap power semiconductors. It balances theoretical potential and practical limitations while assessing commercial readiness and mapping trajectories for further innovation. This article will benefit researchers and professionals advancing power electronic systems.

1. Introduction

In the era of power electronics, wide and ultrawide bandgap power electronic semiconductors have become a game-changing innovation. These cutting-edge materials, such as silicon carbide (SiC), gallium nitride (GaN), and diamond, perform better than conventional Si-based products. In recent years, significant improvements have been made in wide bandgap power electronic semiconductors regarding the materials’ caliber, device design, and production techniques. The creation of superior SiC and GaN substrates, advancements in crystal growth methods, and improved device production procedures have all been created by academics and business stakeholders. Wide bandgap devices are becoming more commercially viable due to these developments’ increased material performance, greater device yields, and lower production costs. Electronic switching devices are essentially used in power electronic converters to control electrical energy efficiently. Higher efficiency, greater power densities, and more integrated systems have always been the direction of power electronics technology development. Like many technologies, power semiconductor technology has been growing towards this constant progress. The development of diverse Si power devices over the past 50 years has been the main driver of the advancements [1].
Si is currently, by far, the most established semiconductor material used in power devices. However, due to its limitations, engineers and academics have made significant efforts to identify alternatives to Si-based power devices for greater performance. These devices are getting close to their material limits [2]. The introduction of power devices based on wide bandgap (WBG) materials such as SiC and GaN has been a revolutionary advancement. Utilizing these new wide bandgaps (WBGs) power semiconductor devices increases the efficiency of electric energy transformations, allowing for a more logical use of electric energy and a significant reduction in power converter size and robustness. SiC and GaN are excellent trade-offs between theoretical and practical properties among the possible semiconductor materials candidates. Moreover, these materials’ key advantages over Si include good performance across a wide temperature range, high dielectric strength, and high saturation drift velocity [3].
SiC is one of the most widely studied and commercially available wide bandgap materials. It possesses a bandgap energy of approximately 3.3 electron volts (eV), significantly higher than Si’s 1.1 eV. SiC-based power devices offer numerous advantages, including reduced conduction and switching losses, higher temperature tolerance, and increased efficiency. These properties make SiC devices well-suited for electric vehicles, renewable energy systems, industrial motor drives, and aerospace applications [4,5]. GaN is another prominent wide bandgap material recently gaining significant attention. GaN exhibits a bandgap energy of around 3.4 eV, similar to SiC. GaN-based power devices provide exceptional performance characteristics, including high breakdown voltages, fast switching speeds, and low on-resistance. These attributes make GaN devices ideal for applications requiring high-frequency operation, such as wireless power transfer, data centers, and radar systems.
It is widely known that, when running under reverse bias in the natural environment, Si power metal oxide field effect transistors (MOSFETs) are highly capable of single-event burnout (SEB) [6,7]. The parasitic bipolar transistor built into the design may turn on due to the transitory current created by intense heavy ion penetration through the device. Voltage ranges can vary up to 600 V regarding Si MOSFETs [8]. With the support of more than 600 V voltage applications, insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) have developed necessary applications. However, due to their maximum switching losses, IGBT devices have become low-efficient at high frequencies [9].
Over the past 20 years, a great deal of research has been carried out on SiC power devices, and many are currently in the market. In particular, SiC is utilized outside of semiconducting, including in ceramic plates, thin filament pyrometry, foundry crucibles, bulletproof jackets, and auto clutches. Because it may operate at greater temperatures, higher current densities, and higher blocking voltages because of the wider bandgap, higher thermal conductivity, and larger critical electric field [10,11,12,13], one of its earliest uses in electrical applications was as a lightning arrester in a high-voltage power system. Schottky diodes, MOSFETs, IGBTs, and power electronics are examples of SiC’s recent use in electronics.
Compared to SiC technology, GaN has a greater bandgap energy and higher electron mobility [14]. It has also progressed in the low- to medium-voltage, high-frequency sector. For high-frequency applications based on lateral transistors, GaN is more effective. Both materials can offer better performances than the Si devices on the market [15,16], but the many technological processes for transistor manufacture must be properly integrated. GaN-based Field Effect Transistors (FETs), also known as, GaN High Electron Mobility Transistor (HEMTs) can switch faster than Si power transistors. GaN HEMTs have a tiny physical growth, which enables the devices to be more energy-efficient and high voltage application while providing extra space for external components. The properties of Si, SiC, and GaN have been demonstrated in Figure 1.
SiC is the third hardest substance on earth and is known to be as hard as a single crystal. The SiC energy gap ranges from 2 to 3.3 eV depending on the polytype crystal structure. SiCs are the ideal choice among commercially available WBG devices due to their greater power rating, quicker switching frequency, much lower switching losses, and capacity to handle higher junction temperatures than Si-based devices. Another promising wide bandgap semiconductor material GaN [16,17,18,19] is an example of the third generation of semiconductor materials, with a wider bandgap (bandgap width of more than 3.4 eV), high critical breakdown electric field, high anti-radiation ability, and rapid electron saturation velocity. GaN material has a wide range of applications and is one of the most efficient ways to save energy and reduce consumption worldwide. It summarizes recent research on GaN technology, demonstrating the slow but steady development of a local GaN supply chain.
Wide bandgap power electronic semiconductors are now in the state of active research and development. Researchers are constantly investigating novel device architectures, packaging methods, and heat management strategies to improve further the performance, reliability, and efficiency of wide bandgap devices. These initiatives tackle issues including enhancing device dependability, cutting manufacturing costs, and boosting system-level integration. Wide bandgap power electronic semiconductor applications are also being expanded into new markets, including 5G wireless communications, the Internet of Things (IoT), and sophisticated medical equipment. Wide bandgap devices thrive in these applications because they need excellent power density, quick switching times, and high-frequency functioning.
Ultrawide bandgap (UWBG) semiconductors like diamond enable incredibly promising electrical gadgets. Diamond has a band gap of 5.5 eV broad, more than five times that of Si [17]. Diamond transistor devices can theoretically switch at frequencies over 100 GHz and function at temperatures higher than 600 °C. High-power diamond Schottky diodes for power electronics, diamond UV detectors for monitoring flames, and diamond radiation detectors for physics research are a few unusual applications. Diamond’s excellent heat conductivity and breakdown voltage enable incredibly small, effective power devices. The difficulties in doping diamonds to create trustworthy ohmic connections and the constraints in manufacturing large single-crystal diamond wafers are obstacles to developing diamond electronics. However, in situ-doped polycrystalline diamond films and diamond-on-Si techniques are advancing the field [17]. Diamond has the potential for orders of magnitude of improvements in power density, operating temperature, radiation hardness, and switching speed compared to traditional electronics. Deep space missions to power grid electronics could benefit from revolutionary applications if the diamond’s full potential is realized. Due to their high-efficiency power conversion, electric vehicles have longer driven ranges and require less time to charge. Utilizing wide bandgap technology, renewable energy systems like solar and wind power may maximize energy collecting and grid integration [18]. Moreover, their high-power density and enhanced thermal management capabilities are advantageous for aerospace and defense applications.
This manuscript first provides the background on power electronics and wide bandgap materials. After that, in separate sections for each material, it describes the properties, historical development, devices, applications, and difficulties of the major semiconductors: Si, SiC, GaN, and diamond. It then assesses recent advancements in IGBTs and MOSFETs and compares performance characteristics like bandgap, breakdown voltage, and switching frequency across the materials. Adoption trends and the current commercial environment are also covered. The conclusion summarizes the results and provides a forecast for future developments. The review is organized to present a thorough technology overview, evaluate the state of the art, and give strategic recommendations to researchers and industry professionals working on the future generation of high-efficiency power semiconductors.
The focus of this article is to provide an extensive review of wide and ultrawide bandgap power semiconductor devices. From the earliest device inventions to the most recent market offerings, it describes the historical development in research and commercialization for each material. The article examines important properties of several devices, including power diodes, MOSFETs, IGBTs, bandgap, critical electric field, voltage/current ratings, switching frequency, packaging, and dependability. SiC and GaN are given much attention because they compete directly with Si devices due to their bigger bandgaps. Challenges like material availability, thermal management, cost reduction, and gate drive complexity are examined. The current commercial environment is evaluated, following adoption patterns and technological advancements resulting in gains in aerospace, renewable energy, electric vehicles, and other applications needing high-efficiency power conversion [4,5]. The assessment integrates advancements across the wide bandgap power semiconductor spectrum to inform and direct future innovation in this promising field.

2. Si

The preceding discussion demonstrates that Si power devices remain the workhorse technology in power electronics applications despite rising competition from WBG power devices. Si is a Group 14 (IVA) member in the periodic table of elements. Si is also part of the carbon family. These family elements include C, Ge, Sn, and Pb. Si is a metalloid, one of only a few elements with metal and nonmetal properties. Aside from oxygen, Si is the second most abundant element on Earth’s crust. Si was established in 1960 by the 11th General Conference on Weights and Measures, CGPM, Conférence Générale des Poids ET Mesures [19]. The CGPM is the international authority that ensures the wide dissemination of Si and modifies it as necessary to reflect the latest advances in science and technology. It has a diamond cubic crystal structure with a lattice parameter of 0.543 nm [20]. The historical overview of Si wafer diameter and crystal weight increase goes beyond the scope of this article. In Table 1, the historical timetable of Si evaluation is presented.
Being a semiconductor, the element, ceramics, and bricks are used for making transistors. It is a vital component of Portland cement. Si materials are used in components of electronic devices. It also makes solar cells [21,22,23,24,25] and parts for computer circuits [26]. A solar cell is a device that converts sunlight into electrical energy [27,28,29,30]. A rectifier is an electrical device that converts alternating current to direct current. The most important Si alloys are those made with Fe, Al, and Cu. When Si is produced, scrap iron and metal are sometimes added to the furnace [31,32]. Several waterproofing systems employ Si as a component for water purification. Si is used in many mold release agents and molding compounds. It is also a component of ferroSi—an alloy widely used in the steel industry.
The diamond cubic crystal structure of Si has a face-centered cubic (FCC) lattice with a basis of two Si atoms. Table 2 overviews Ribbon and Multi-Si technology improvements within the next 5–8 years [33]. However, an analysis of Mono-Si technology was not carried out because the current Mono-Si technology still has too much uncertainty.

2.1. Si Diode

For many years, Si diode power semiconductors have been crucial in several applications because of their dependable and effective rectification capabilities. Low forward voltage drops, high current-carrying capacity, and exceptional thermal stability are all positive traits of Si diodes [34]. Their extensive use can be ascribed to their proven dependability records, cost efficiency, and sophisticated production methods. Numerous devices, such as power supplies, inverters, rectifiers, and voltage regulators, use Si diodes. The Si Power Rapid Diode family bridges the gap between SiC diodes. Examples of such Si diodes are previously released emitter-controlled diodes and Infineon’s existing high-power 600 V/650 V diode. Moreover, the TRENCHSTOP™ 5 and high-speed 3 IGBT (Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor) and CoolMOSTM are good partners for the Rapid 1 and Rapid 2 diodes [35]. For usage in automotive, industrial power control, power management, sensor solutions, and security in Internet of Things applications, Infineon Technologies provides a comprehensive selection of ready-to-use semiconductor design solutions and reference schematics. Si diodes are ultra- and hyper-fast and have outstanding performance with a voltage range of 600–1200 V [36].
As mentioned earlier, the gap between SiC diodes and emitter-controlled diodes is filled by the Rapid 1 and Rapid 2 power Si diodes, which are a complement to the current high-power 600 V/650 V diodes. The new families of hyper- and ultra-fast diodes provide exceptional efficiency and dependability while striking the ideal balance between price and performance. The additional 50 V provides higher reliability.
The 650 V Rapid 1 Diode: The Rapid 1 diode series has the lowest conduction losses, and the smooth recovery minimizes EMI emissions with a 1.35 V temperature-stable forward voltage (FV). The equipment is ideal for power factor correction (PFC) topologies, frequently used in large home appliances like air conditioners and washers.
The 650 V Rapid 2 Diode: The family of Rapid 2 diodes is designed for applications switching between 40 kHz and 100 kHz by providing a low reverse recovery charge (Qrr) and time (trr) to reduce the reverse conduction times associated with the power switch turn-on losses and to provide maximum efficiency [37].

2.2. Si MOSFET

MOSFETs are extensively utilized power semiconductors that have completely changed the power electronics industry. FETs) have become the most significant device in the semiconductor industry due to Lilienfeld’s 1930 [38] patent on the idea and Kahng and Atalla’s 1960 [39] practical implementation of Si/Si dioxide. The development of this industry has been characterized by an exponential pattern known as Moore’s law over the past seven decades [40]. Today’s metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) has undergone several modifications, evolving from a single-gate planar MOSFET to a multiple-gate non-planar MOSFET. Nevertheless, it has been and will continue to be the mainstay of the semiconductor industry for the foreseeable future.
MOSFETs made of Si rely on modulating the conductive channel that forms between a semiconductor layer’s source and drain terminals. The device’s bulk is a Si substrate that has been extensively doped; the gate insulator is a thin Si dioxide layer. A voltage applied to the gate terminal generates an electric field that regulates the channel’s conductivity. A positive voltage repels the majority carriers (for an N-channel MOSFET, electrons) from the channel, resulting in a depletion area and decreasing the conductivity of the channel [41]. Applying a negative voltage draws in most of the carriers and improves the conductivity of the channel. The MOSFET may change between the ON state (conducting) and the OFF state (non-conducting) by varying the gate voltage. This idea makes it possible to effectively manage the MOSFET’s ability to handle power and current flow. These components have low on-resistance and can handle large voltages and currents, making efficient power conversion and control possible [6]. The conductivity of Si MOSFETs may be precisely controlled by using a thin Si dioxide layer as the gate insulator. They offer quick switching times, little gate drive needs, and superior thermal performance.
The main electrical specs for five commercial Si power MOSFETs with current ratings ranging from 2.5 A to 40 A are provided in Table 3. Input capacitance Ciss and on-state resistance Rds(on) grow along with the current rating, whereas gate-drain capacitance Cgd remains mostly constant. A 2.5 A MOSFET, for example, has a Ciss of 1800 pF and Rds(on) of 0.3, whereas a 40 A device has a Ciss of 10,000 pF and Rds(on) of 0.05. Across different power MOSFETs, a trade-off exists between a higher current capability and electrical characteristics such as input capacitance and on-resistance. Moreover, this table illustrates how Si power MOSFET specs and performance scale across various current ratings.
Several sectors, including the automobile, renewable energy, industrial automation, and telecommunications, use Si MOSFETs extensively. The subject of power electronics has been profoundly influenced by Si MOSFETs, which are incredibly adaptable and dependable power semiconductors. Si MOSFETs have evolved into crucial components in various applications, from automotive and renewable energy to industrial automation and telecommunications, because of their low on-resistance, high voltage and current handling capacity, and quick switching rates. They are a popular option for power electronic systems due to their superior thermal performance and compatibility with well-known production techniques, ensuring effective power conversion and control. The widespread use of Si MOSFETs demonstrates how important a role they have played in boosting the overall performance and dependability of power electronic systems and devices. They are the favored option for power electronic systems due to their dependability, high efficiency, and compatibility with established production methods.

2.3. Si SuperJunction MOSFET

To break the Si 1-D constraint, the super-junction (SJ) concept for vertical power devices was established in the mid-1990s [43,44,45]. When the device is turned off, a vertical P layer or P column is introduced to compensate for the charges in the N drift layer. This approach is highly similar to the RESURF concept [46], which has been used in various lateral power devices. The drift area of these devices has a special design that alternates P- and N-type regions, allowing for a more even dispersion of the electric field. For high-power applications, the SuperJunction design lowers on-resistance and boosts efficiency. SJ MOSFETs are designed to reduce the electric field concentration and provide improved voltage-blocking capabilities by forming a depletion area with several tiny cells [47].
Moreover, lower conduction losses, quicker switching times, and enhanced thermal properties are all improved by this design. As a result, the electric field in an SJ device has changed from a triangle to a blue rectangular form, and the N drift layer doping has increased. Forming the vertical P column is the most difficult part of making SJ MOSFET. There are two popular methods, both of which are commercially employed. Si SJ MOSFETs have gained significant attention in power electronics, particularly in applications such as power supplies, LED lighting, and motor drives. Their advanced design and improved efficiency contribute to higher power density and system performance. As a result, Si SJ MOSFETs are rarely used in applications that need a third-quadrant operation, such as voltage source inverters.

2.4. Si IGBT

Si IGBTs are critical power semiconductors that have transformed the field of power electronics. These power devices have revolutionized by combining the advantages of MOSFETs and bipolar junction transistors (BJTs) [48]. They offer high voltage and current handling capabilities while maintaining low on-state voltage drop and fast switching speeds. The structure of a Si IGBT comprises three layers: an N-type collector, a P-type base, and an N-type emitter. By regulating the conductivity of the base region through the voltage applied to the gate terminal, the IGBT enables efficient power switching. The performance and efficiency of Si IGBTs have recently been improved for various applications. One key development is integrating cutting-edge trench gate architectures and novel cell designs. These developments have improved switching speeds, decreased on-state losses, and reduced conduction losses. Furthermore, recent research has concentrated on improving the thermal management of the IGBT, enabling better power densities and increased reliability [49]. Due to improvements in power conversion efficiency, increased power density, and system performance, they are now more appropriate for various applications, including electric cars, renewable energy systems, and industrial automation.
Additionally, current Si IGBT advances have concentrated on reaching greater voltage ratings while lowering power losses. One significant development is using cutting-edge gate-driving methods and cell structure optimization in IGBTs. These developments have increased voltage ratings, decreased conduction and switching losses, and enhanced efficiency [50]. Advanced production methods and materials have also made it possible for better thermal management, which has increased power density and enhanced dependability. The latest advancements in Si IGBT technology have opened the door for creating smaller and more effective power electronic systems in various sectors.
The main features and specifications of popular Si power semiconductor devices, such as BJTs, diodes, MOSFETs, IGBTs, and thyristors, are compared in Table 4. For instance, Si IGBTs have medium conduction, high switching, and overall high-power losses while operating up to 1.2 kV blocking voltage and 50 A current rating. They work well in situations requiring medium voltage and medium frequency. In contrast, despite their slow switching speed, Si thyristors can handle high-voltage, low-frequency applications with up to 4 kV voltage and 3000 A current capacity. Si MOSFETs, which have a blocking voltage of 600 V and a current rating of 100 A, as well as minimal conduction and switching losses, fill the low-voltage, high-frequency market niche. Each Si device has defined features based on its advantages; however, it is constrained by the characteristics.
Table 5 compares four common Si-based power semiconductor devices—diodes, MOSFETs, super junction MOSFETs, and IGBTs—on features like scalability, cost, failure modes, and typical applications, showing the tradeoffs between different devices for use in power electronics and motor drives. MOSFETs and IGBTs are more scalable and suitable for high-power applications like motor drives. At the same time, diodes tend to be lower cost but limited to simpler rectification and voltage clamping circuits.

3. Silicon Carbide (SiC)

SiC is a semiconducting material with outstanding physical, chemical, and electrical properties, making it very suitable for fabricating high-power, low-loss semiconductor devices. Moreover, commercially available SiC devices have lower switching/conduction loss, superior thermal stability, and greater temperature tolerance. SiC devices are, therefore, a very promising alternative to converters designed for high-temperature applications [51]. SiC power electronic devices have a theoretically allowed junction temperature of 600 °C due to the semiconductor’s wide bandgap, around three times that of Si material [52]. On the other hand, the fabrication of these devices is rather intricate owing to the same properties of SiC, like its chemical inertness and hardness. It took over a hundred years to develop SiC electronics up to its modern state when power SiC devices possessing higher efficiency than their Si counterparts became commercially available and widely used in numerous applications. The resistance of the SiC material to an electric field is ten times greater than the resistance of the Si. As a result, SiC devices could be considered capable of withstanding the same blocking voltage with a 10-times-thinner material [53].
A tetrahedral crystalline structure is formed when each Si atom shares its electrons with four carbon atoms. Different SiC poly varieties can be made from this fundamental structure. Shown as Figure 2, SiC is the only chemical compound of group IV elements. It has a strictly stoichiometric concentration ratio of Si and carbon (C) atoms. It should not be mixed with solid solutions, which may be formed by other group IV elements and may have variable component concentration ratios (e.g., SixGe1-x) [54].
SiC devices can operate at higher switching dynamics. The thermal energy required for an electron to pass from the valence band to the conduction band (forming an electron-hole pair) is considerable in WBG materials. As a result, even at high junction temperatures, the WBG device’s electric characteristics are retained within defined bounds. This enables SiC semiconductor devices to function at high temperatures. Currently, the operating temperature range for SiC devices on the market is between 200 °C and 300 °C [55]. Therefore, SiCs are the ideal choice among commercially available WBD devices due to their greater power rating, quicker switching frequency, much lower switching losses, and capacity to handle higher junction temperatures than Si-based devices [54].

3.1. Discovery of SiC

As previously mentioned, SiC is an excellent material for high-power electronics and high-temperature applications because it has a wide bandgap and good thermal stability [56]. However, 2D SiC offers incredible new features missing from bulk SiC materials due to quantum confinement and surface effects [57,58,59]. SiC has arguably had the longest history of all the semiconducting materials used in electronics. SiC was found as a manufactured material, which makes its discovery exceptional in and of itself. Jöns Jacob Berzelius (1779–1848), in his 1824 report, most likely made the first observation of a chemical molecule bearing Si–C bonds [60]. He could conduct experiments in peculiar settings because of his acknowledged expertise in experimental methods. He also discovered several new chemical elements, including Si, and many other accomplishments. Berzelius made the extremely cautious claim that he had identified a substance that, when burned, created an equal number of Si and carbon atoms [61].
Seventy years later, the first validated SiC synthesis took place by chance [62]. American engineer Edward Goodrich Acheson (1856–1931) experimented with a newly developed electrical furnace in 1891 to create synthetic diamonds (highly demanded by the industry as an abrasive material) [24]. B. I. Ozernikova and A. P. Bobrievich discovered the first naturally occurring SiC of terrestrial origin in sediments of the Tyung River (Siberia) in 1956 and diamond-bearing kimberlite pipes in Yakutia, USSR, respectively, in 1957 [63]. From Schottky diodes in the 1990s to high voltage SiC MOSFETs and IGBTs in the 2020s, Table 6 traces the evolution of SiC devices, highlighting key developments like the first commercial devices, normally off JFETs, and trench gate MOSFETs that enabled higher voltage, current, and frequency capabilities compared to Si devices for uses like EVs and PV inverters. SiC device advancements and the emergence of GaN/SiC hybrids are boosting adoption and enabling performance above traditional Si power electronics.

3.2. Material Growth

Wide bandgap semiconductor SiC has outstanding features that make it highly sought-after for various applications. Epitaxy, the process through which SiC crystals grow, is essential for creating high-performance electronics. Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor transfer (PVT) are two growth techniques that have been used [64]. In CVD, SiC is deposited on a substrate due to the high-temperature decomposition of a precursor gas that contains Si and carbon. SiC source material in PVT is sublimated and recrystallizes onto a colder substrate. To produce high-quality single-crystal SiC, both processes require exact temperature control and a suitable growing environment. Growth rate, shape, and crystal quality are influenced by temperature gradients, gas flow rates, and crystal orientation [65]. Larger, higher-quality SiC crystals with fewer flaws have been made possible by improvements in growth methods and equipment, allowing for the manufacture of power electronic devices, high-frequency devices, and sensors that provide greater performance and efficiency compared to conventional materials [66]. The widespread use of SiC in several technological applications will be facilitated by further research and development efforts in SiC growing processes, which promise future improvements in crystal quality, scalability, and cost-effectiveness.

3.3. SiC Diode

Due to the greater SiC dielectric critical field than its Si counterparts, a blocking voltage rise of 10 times above that of Si is achievable with the same thickness of the SiC drift layer. Compared to Si diodes, SiC’s high thermal conductivity has several benefits, including the ability to operate at higher current density ratings and reduce the size of cooling systems. SiC SBDs have been commercially available since 2001 and have continuously increased in the blocking voltage and conduction current ratings. There are essentially three types of SiC power diodes [67]. The PN junction and the Schottky Barrier Diode (SBD) junction are two semiconductor mechanisms that can create a diode, and there is no conductivity modulation in the SBD. From 600 V to 10 kV, Si PN junction diodes dominate the market. The scenario is fully reversed in the case of SBD on WBG material, such as SiC. The high critical electric field Ec in SiC reduces the resistance of an SBD significantly. As a result, conductivity modulation is neither necessary nor desirable. Because SBD does not store any charge, it can achieve near-zero reverse recovery loss. As a result, a WBG diode based on the Schottky mechanism is nearly optimal. The junction barrier Schottky (JBS) diode structure, which provides an area to shield the Schottky region in a reverse blocking state, can be used to reduce leakage current.
The PN junction of the JBS diode can become conductive at a high forward bias, giving it a stronger surge capability than the SBD [68]. On the other hand, the SiC PN junction diode will have to overcome a forward voltage drop of roughly 3 V across the PN junction, making it exceedingly undesirable from the standpoint of conduction loss, even if the drift area resistance can be decreased via conductivity modulation. The JBS structure is typically used in SiC diodes above 600 V. Because the off-state leakage current in JBS is decreased, devices can be rated at temperatures as high as 175 °C. Majority of the carrier electrons still are used for device conduction, and advantages of the SiC PIN diode over JBS or SBD is its substantially lower leakage current, which makes it an ideal option for high-voltage and high-temperature operation.

3.4. SiC MOSFET

SiC power MOSFETs are quickly gaining widespread application. Reliability issues like bias temperature instability and gate oxide cracking are mostly under control [69]. It is the chosen SiC three-terminal switch due to the well-established gate-driving technique and user base in Si MOSFET and IGBT compared to SiC JFET and BJT. It is commercially available in voltages ranging from 650 V to 1700 V, with higher current (5–600 A) modules [70]. SiC MOSFETs provide clear prospects for improving operating frequency, efficiency, and power density, but their employment is complicated by several unwanted side effects brought on by their rapid switching speed [71]. The characteristics of five commercial SiC MOSFETs are listed in Table 7, along with their component numbers, maximum current ratings in Amps, input capacitances (CISS) in pF, gate-drain capacitances (CGD) in pF, and drain-source on-state resistances (Rds(on)) in Ohms. SiC MOSFETs can achieve relatively low on-resistances—0.013 Ohms for an 80 A device, which enable high-frequency switching, but at the expense of greater input and gate capacitances than Si MOSFETs.
When compared to the IGBT system, the operation frequency of SiC MOSFET-based converters has increased by one or two orders of magnitude, as demonstrated in Figure 3. SiC MOSFETs can also achieve zero switching loss under specific situations. A 1.2 kV SiC MOSFET module was recently proven to operate at 3.38 MHz [72,73]. The P regions shelter the gate oxide in the planar structure, so the peak electric field near the oxide is decreased. The gate-oxide stability problem in planar MOSFETs has been overcome, and high-reliability performance has been attained [74].
General Electric (GE) also exhibited the industry’s first dependable SiC MOSFET with a 200 °C junction temperature [75,76]. This is more difficult in the trench device. Many different trench structures exist to protect the trench gate’s bottom [77,78,79,80,81,82]. Another key motivator for SiC MOSFET innovation, in addition to enhancing electrical performance, is reliability. The three key criteria for evaluating dependability are high-temperature gate bias, high-temperature reverse bias, and high-humidity, high-temperature reverse bias. One of the most important challenges in the fabrication of SiC-MOSFETs was the lack of a reliable insulator for the gate terminal. A proper insulator is needed to achieve stable forward I–V characteristics and a stable gate threshold voltage. For this reason, the SiC-MOSFET was commercialized later than the SiC-JFET. Most MOSFETs contain a PIN diode inherent to their structure. This diode has a forward bias voltage around 2.5 V. During the conduction of the body diode, if the MOSFET is turned on, the forward characteristic of the body diode can be virtually improved, and, thus, the conduction losses are reduced. Figure 4 shows the calculated converter efficiency for a 1200-V SiC MOSFET system versus that is based on an IGBT/SiC diode hybrid power module. These graphs are critical for designing power converters for various applications.
Switches, solenoids, encoders, generators, and electric motors are the primary electromechanical devices that connect the digital and physical worlds. The capacity of each of these gadgets to translate electrical impulses into mechanical motions is what gives them their enchantment. The need for more control, efficiency, and capabilities from these electromechanical devices rises as fields like automated manufacturing, electronic vehicles, sophisticated building systems, and smart appliances develop [84]. It investigates how improvements in SiC MOSFETs are expanding the possibilities of electric motors, which hitherto relied on Si IGBTs for power inversion. Similar to the new power electronic converters, SiC devices could be utilized for motor driver applications for novel electric machines for various applications [85,86,87,88,89,90]. This development increases the potential of motor drive applications across all industries.
The cabling between the drive inverters and the motor driver may be significantly reduced by bringing the motor driver assembly to the motor’s local position, resulting in considerable cost savings. Figure 5 shows seven motors of a robotic arm, that is required to be powered by 21 different cables, which might require hundreds of meters of costly and intricate cabling infrastructure, in a typical Si IGBT power cabinet. Two lengthy cables that link to each motor’s motor drive within the local motor assembly can be used in a SiC MOSFET motor drive system to decrease the number of cables [84]. There are specific applications where IGBTs may still be better suited, as is true for all types of components; however, SiC MOSFET inverters offer several distinct advantages over Si IGBTs, making them very attractive solutions for motor drive and a wide range of other applications.

3.5. SiC IGBT

SiC IGBT has received a lot of interest in the domains of high voltage transmission, smart grid, and pulse power since it is the highest voltage switch. SiC IGBTs have not been commercialized because of their inherent flaws and crude manufacturing methods. The stated SiC IGBT devices’ exceptional static and dynamic performance and significant dv/dt during hard switching challenge the power conversion system. SiC IGBT has a lot of potential solutions; however, comparisons with Si IGBT and SiC MOSFET reveal significant discrepancies. The potential SiC IGBT appears to have a chance to displace Si devices in the future based on early experiments in high-voltage fields.
High voltage direct current transmission (HVDC), industrial applications, traction systems, and new pulsed power applications are the key markets for Si IGBT with high voltage and current. Ultra-high voltage in these domains is intended to decrease the number of devices connected in series and simplify converter topologies [91]. According to one source, Si IGBTs can withstand a maximum voltage of 8.4 kV [92], which is about as high as Si devices can go. The continued advancement of Si IGBT in these sectors is also severely constrained by frequency and operating temperature. SiC exhibits greater breakdown field strength, inherent temperature, thermal conductivity, and carrier saturation drift velocity as a wide bandgap material [93]. As can be seen in Table 8, the SiC IGBT device is more competitive in high-voltage, high-temperature, and high-power areas. The SiC IGBT with 4H-polytype and n-channel is chosen among SiC polytypes and channel types because it has a low forward voltage (Vf), quick switching, and a large safe working region. Wide-base PNP transistors in 4H-SiC N-IGBTs have excellent bulk mobility and low current gain, contributing to a favorable trade-off between Vf and switching loss.
SiC IGBTs have a lower Vf than Si IGBTs under the same blocking capability but have lower bulk mobility than Si IGBTs. Even though SiC IGBTs have not yet been commercialized, significant advancements have been made over the previous 30 years, as seen in Figure 1. Because of the readily accessible n+ substrate with low resistivity and defect density, the SiC p-channel IGBT has been widely investigated from 1996 when the first SiC IGBT was produced [95] through 2010. Continuous improvements have been made to the P-IGBT’s performance, notably since the charge storage layer (CSL) was introduced [96]. Due to immature technology and a P-type substrate with a high resistivity and defect density during this time, the constructed N-channel IGBT performs poorly [97].
Because free-standing technology offers a way to develop a P+ collector on an N+ substrate, the research focus of SiC IGBT shifted to SiC N-channel IGBT before Cooper’s freestanding technology proposal in 2010 [98]. After that, SiC N-IGBT displays ever-improving static and dynamic properties. The SiC IGBT has a blocking voltage that exceeds 27 kV [99], making it a promising device in high-voltage areas. In comparison to the SiC MOSFET of the same rated voltage, the SiC IGBT might cut the differential specific on-resistances (Ron,sp,diff) by more than one order of magnitude. Therefore, even if the switching loss (Esw) of the SiC IGBT is larger than that of SiC MOSFET, it is promising for power conversion systems with more than 100 kW transmission power. Recently, the first solid-state transformer prototypes and the first Marx generators have also been made using the 12–15 kV SiC IGBT modules that were developed [100,101,102].
SiC-IGBTs are more effective than Si-IGBTs because of their switching speed. The gate-to-emitter voltage rise quickly to allow for the SiC-IGBT to switch quickly. Therefore, to charge the input capacitance Ciss, a greater gate current is needed [103]. Generally, to switch the IGBT off, the gate current capability is increased by reducing the external turn-on and turn-off gate resistors even though the same current capability is needed. In order for the gate current to rise as quickly as required, the gate driver’s stray inductance must also be kept to a minimum [94]. SiC-IGBTs need a negative gate-to-emitter voltage like that found in Si-IGBTs to obtain a quick and secure turn-off transient. A SiC-IGBT driver typically supplies a gate-to-emitter voltage of +20 V positive and 5 V negative [104].
SiC BJTs, JFETs, Schottky diodes, and MOSFETs are four popular SiC power semiconductor devices described and shown in Table 9. SiC devices outperform Si in high-voltage, high-frequency applications like PV inverters, EV systems, and power supplies. It compares parameters like bandgap, electron mobility, voltage/current ratings, switching frequency, power losses, and figures of merit. The table shows the compromises made by various SiC devices for application-specific performance optimization.

3.6. Applications and Emergence of SiC Power Electronics

SiC is employed in semiconducting and other items such as armored vehicles, ceramic plates, thin filament pyrometry, foundry crucibles, and auto clutches. SiC was initially used in electrical applications as a lightning arrester in a high-voltage power system because engineers and scientists realized SiC works well even in the presence of high volts and high temperatures. SiC devices are appropriate for a wide range of applications in aerospace and space missions [105,106], despite the necessity for high-temperature dependable device packaging to be developed [107,108]. Schottky diodes, MOSFETs, and power electronics are some of the most recent electrical devices that use SiC.
Applications for SiC include sandblasting injectors, automobile water pump seals, bearings, pump parts, and extrusion dies. These applications use SiC’s exceptional hardness, abrasion resistance, and corrosion resistance [109]. SiC is undoubtedly durable and versatile, with applications ranging from semiconductors for Schottky diodes to use as an abrasive polishing material. Its exceptional qualities include sublimation, great chemical inertness and corrosion resistance, excellent thermal characteristics, and the capacity to develop as a single-crystal structure.
The introduction of the first mass-produced electrical vehicles (EVs) to the market in 2008—Tesla Motors’ debut of its first all-electric vehicle—significantly impacted the development of SiC power electronics. Two components of the electrical power train significantly impact the performance of these cars. They are an inverter and a battery charger that transform the DC power from a battery pack into AC power for a motor. Since the battery capacitance in EVs restricts the amount of on-board stored energy, the efficiency of power conversion by these units is crucial. The bulk of modern electric vehicles (EVs) and the first electric vehicles (EVs) used inverters with Si IGBTs and conversion efficiencies ranging from 80% to 95%. Even at 95% efficiency, these inverters waste too much energy and need liquid cooling. Compared to the electrical motors, they are bigger and heavier. The conversion efficiency of the inverter might be increased to 99% [110] by swapping Si IGBTs for SiC MOSFETs while being significantly lighter and smaller. The first commercial SiC power MOSFET was introduced by Cree, Inc. in 2011 [111]. This potential use of SiC power devices in the high-volume automotive sector sparked increased research into the design and technology of SiC devices.
Tesla introduced the Model 3 in 2017, the first electric vehicle to have inverters based on SiC MOSFETs. By the time this article was published, each week’s manufacturing of automobiles used 48 SiC MOSFETs with a 650 V/100 A rating made at the STMicroelectronics fab in Catania, Italy [112]. At the same time, Tesla Model 3’s traction motor spins at 17,900 revolutions per minute, and China’s NEV Technology Roadmap 2.0 aims to reach a motor speed of 25,000 rotations per minute by 2035 [113]. DENSO, a global automotive manufacturer, built its first inverter using SiC semiconductors. The new Lexus RZ, a Toyota luxury brand’s first specifically designed battery electric vehicle (BEV) model, will employ this inverter, which is part of the eAxle, an electric drive module designed by BluE Nexus Corporation [114]. It appears that Toyota is producing its first BEV in large quantities through the Lexus Division. SiC and GaN are competing to see which is superior for power electronics. They both outperform Si in either situation.
The market for SiC power devices is expanding rapidly, and the SiC industrial sector today exhibits significant diversity, with successful businesses operating in various ways. This predicts that SiC power electronics will continue to flourish as an industrial technology during the coming several decades. The enormous potential of SiC as a material for high-temperature and high-frequency electronics, which is still not realized and is awaiting convincing demonstration of SiC’s superiority over conventional semiconductors for these applications, is another factor driving the further development of SiC technology.
Over the past 13 years, GE Aviation has committed over $150 million to developing SiC technology, solidifying its position as the market leader. Because of characteristics like high-temperature tolerance, low losses, and higher frequencies, SiC enables lighter, more effective, and higher-performance power electronics. To reach extremely high-power density and efficiency goals, GE is utilizing SiC technology in aerospace applications, including hybrid electric aircraft propulsion. GE can create lighter and more potent systems for electric ground vehicles and other applications due to SiC. GE Aviation is well-positioned to promote SiC power device adoption moving ahead due to its extensive aerospace knowledge and experience.
The SiC-based generator controller developed by GE Aerospace shows a significant advancement in power electronics when compared to industrial Si-based generator controllers, as shown in Table 10. Its benefits are glaringly obvious in many important areas. First off, the SiC controller is extraordinarily effective at harvesting and managing electrical power within a small footprint due to an amazing fourfold improvement in power density relative to its size. With a twofold increase in power density per unit weight, its power-to-weight ratio is also improved, which results in both increased efficiency and a decrease in the overall weight of the controller. This drop is accompanied by a 50% reduction in physical size, highlighting SiC’s promise for applications that conserve space. Notably, the SiC-based controller excels at increasing conversion efficiency. It increases DC/AC conversion efficiency from 94% to an astounding 99%, guaranteeing little energy is lost in the process. Similarly, it improves efficiency in DC/DC conversions from 84% to 95%, maximizing power transfer. SiC technology improves efficiency in AC/DC conversions from 85% to 92%, leading to more effective power conversion and energy use.
Figure 6 shows the evaluation of SiC modules and SiC technology utilized in aerospace applications by GE Aerospace in conjunction with Power America, the Department of Energy, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Specifications for various SiC power module variants from GE Aerospace are listed in Table 11. The modules have voltage ratings of 1200 V and 1700 V and come in half-bridge, dual-bridge, six-switch, and six-pack versions. Ratings range from 425 A to 1425 A. On-state resistance, thermal resistance, size, and maximum junction temperature are important factors mentioned. With small footprints up to 100 mm × 140 mm and operational temperatures up to 175 °C, the table demonstrates great power density and temperature capability of SiC modules. SiC modules can be configured in a wide range of ways to accommodate various power electronic circuit topologies and the current/voltage ratings needed for aviation applications.

3.7. Challenges of SiC Power Device Development

Although high voltage (HV) SiC devices perform better than their Si counterparts, additional considerations must be made to use them effectively. The HV SiC device application must overcome obstacles in a variety of time frames. The majority of difficulties are caused by relatively brief time intervals (between 0.01 and 1 μs), such as electromagnetic interference (EMI), packaging, and gate drive design. The output of a SiC-based converter can have advantages in terms of output with a high-frequency range, low total harmonic distortion (THD), and high control bandwidth, to name a few. Newly developed converter topologies and PWM schemes could be utilized with SiC devices to compare the viability of the device [118,119,120,121]. HV SiC device application technology is still in the early stages of development [122]. The material’s properties present a significant problem for SiC manufacturing. Generally, SiC takes more energy, longer, and higher temperatures for crystal growth and processing due to its extreme hardness, which is nearly diamond-like [123].

3.7.1. Packaging

Building power modules with small and fast device dies requires addressing electrical, thermal, and mechanical challenges. Figure 7 depicts a typical power module packing.

3.7.2. Electrical Insulation

The packaging of HV SiC power modules presents a significant problem regarding electrical insulation design. Special attention should be given to vulnerable places that are easily compromised, such as the die, substrate, and output terminal. SiC devices have substantially greater voltage ratings than Si devices, although SiC devices have thinner dies. The electric field around the die from the anode to the trace that is soldered with the cathode gets noticeably stronger with the higher voltage rating and thinner die. A recent generation 10 kV SiC MOSFET, for instance, has a die thickness of 100 μm and an average electric field of 100 kV/mm [124], but a 1.7 kV IGBT has a die thickness of 209 μm and an electric field of only 8.1 kV/mm [123]. As a result, HV SiC device packaging surrounding the die has an electrical field concentration that is ten times greater than Si’s.

3.7.3. Parasitics

The internal connecting wires inside the module and the external power stage contain the stray inductance. The combination of these stray inductance components affects how well the gadget switches. Using a decoupling capacitor [122,123] can minimize the influence of stray inductance in the external power stage. The stray inductance inside the module is the main subject of this subsection. They primarily have three effects on device performance: voltage overshoot, ringing, and switching speed restriction.

3.7.4. Power Module with Multi-Dies

Developing the multi-die in parallel connection for HV SiC-based power modules is important due to the single die’s restricted current rating of present HV SiC devices, typically approximately 20 A per die. For instance, the 10 kV/240 A SiC MOSFET power module is made up of 18 dies connected in parallel [125].

3.7.5. Gate Drive

The gate drive connects the power semiconductor device and control. Power semiconductors are turned on and off by transferring the control signal from the gate drive to the drive signal. Gate drive design is crucial for SiC devices to achieve their maximum potential. Two crucial factors, efficiency and dependability, should be considered when designing the gate drive. The HV SiC devices do not have commercially accessible gate drivers because they are unique power devices. Its gate drive needs to be the subject of research [122].

3.7.6. Electromagnetic Interference

The converters using HV SiC devices may experience significant EMI due to the high dv/dt caused by the quick switching speed and the huge parasitic capacitance due to the compact size. Both EMI filters and special EMI reduction techniques are desirable. The EMI and dv/dt filters in motor drives are essential for preventing the voltage doubling effect that results from high dv/dt [126]. High dv/dt will significantly increase the grid-side conduction EMI in applications involving the grid. EMI filters are required to ensure that the power conversion system satisfies the criteria for grid-connected converters [127].

3.8. Future Trends of SiC

SiC devices have several advantages and many difficulties from both the device and application viewpoints. These serve as a guide for upcoming developments in research:

3.8.1. Voltage-Derating Guidelines

A voltage-derating design guideline must be devised and SiC devices’ field dependability for various applications must be shown. This is particularly crucial for applications like aviation systems [127], where reliability is essential. On the one hand, a SiC device in a power conversion system may have a greater current rating than a Si device, resulting in a larger thermal ripple. On the other hand, the SiC device’s ability to operate at greater temperatures suggests stricter requirements for the packaging materials.

3.8.2. Improving Manufacturing Techniques for Affordability

To make SiC devices more affordable for system applications, manufacturing techniques must be improved for higher yields [128]. The majority of significant SiC producers are switching to 150 mm SiC epitaxial wafers. There are also debates over switching to a fabless manufacturing method, which would allow SiC power devices to be produced in Si fabs. Because the quality would be ensured by the already existing facilities and established production infrastructure, such a shift would result in lower prices. It is difficult, nevertheless, due to the rigidity of SiC equipment and processes.

3.8.3. Considerations for SiC Device Gate Driver Design

SiC devices switch significantly faster than Si devices, which presents difficulties for the design of the gate driver [129,130]. First, the SiC device’s larger dv/dt injects more common mode current through a miller capacitor into the gate loop, creating a positive spurious gate voltage. An improved gate driver with active dv/dt and di/dt control is a growing trend. Additionally, a greater dv/dt injects a higher common mode current through the isolation barrier to the primary side of the gate driver, limiting the coupling capacitance. Second, SiC devices have a smaller die size and a faster current rise under the fault. Thus, the gate driver’s short circuit protection response requirement is larger, and the SiC device’s parallel or series connection is more susceptible to timing errors.

3.8.4. Novel EMI Filter Design

It is necessary to look at the novel EMI filter design [108]. The EMI noise is 10 to 100 times higher due to the faster switching transient and higher switching frequency. When used in high-voltage and high-power applications, this becomes very difficult. Firstly, SiC power converters require the modeling and prediction methods of EMI noise. On the other side, novel filter and shielding designs are required.

3.8.5. Reducing Commutation Loop for Enhanced SiC Device Performance

Using novel system designs with a reduced commutation loop is crucial, such as the SiC device package and system busbar structure [72]. Although it is known that a SiC power converter may supply more current, this is only true when the breakdown voltage of the device is lower than the device voltage stress during the transition. In other words, the voltage overshoot may restrict the system’s current rating rather than the thermal. This issue is extremely significant for some new applications, such as the 1.5 kV DC photovoltaic system [131]. Up until now, laminated and multi-layer laminated busbar structures have been the preferred option. Investigating a low-inductance capacitor is also necessary.

3.8.6. Exploring Cooling Techniques for SiC Device Reliability

SiC chips’ lower die size and, thus, increased loss density present new design difficulties for heat management techniques [132]. Additionally, the SiC chips’ lower thermal capacitance could lead to a larger temperature ripple, which could present problems from a reliability standpoint. Phase change cooling, liquid jet impingement cooling, and other effective cooling techniques are some prospective, promising alternatives [133]. The advancing 3D printing technologies may also be leveraged to support original ideas.

3.8.7. Advancements in Ancillary Components for High Temperature

SiC power devices’ capacity to operate at high temperatures necessitates advancements in ancillary components such as high-temperature capacitors, packaging, control electronics, gate drivers, and sensors [134]. The bus bars that connect the high-temperature devices to the capacitors make them particularly difficult since they raise the temperature of the capacitors even further. To make the capacitors usable with high-temperature switches, cooling may be required. In addition, Si-on-insulator (SOI) or SiC-based high-temperature gate drivers are required. The typical temperature range for SOI technology is 225 °C or lower. Since SiC has a lower channel mobility than other semiconductors and is, therefore, not appropriate for very low-voltage applications, SiC-based integrated circuit design is complex.

3.8.8. Lowering Engineering Effort and Costs

Due to their lack of familiarity with these novel devices, many potential SiC users are also concerned about the expensive non-recurring engineering expense. The conventional SiC PEBB, like the Si PEBB, can dramatically lower engineering effort and development costs, opening the door for commercializing SiC applications [135]. The heat sink, the robust gate driver, the high-bandwidth and noise-free controller, and the low-inductance busbar may all be incorporated. The entire system might then be constructed entirely around this PEBB for various purposes.

4. GaN

Due to its capacity to provide much better performance across a variety of applications while using less energy and physical space to do so compared to current Si technologies, GaN is gaining significance. GaN technologies are becoming crucial in some applications where Si as a power conversion platform has reached its physical limits, while in other applications the advantages of efficiency, switching speed, compactness, and high-temperature operation combine to make GaN increasingly alluring.
Table 12 depicts the evolution of GaN power semiconductor devices from 1990s HEMTs to current MISFETs (Metal Insulator Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor) and IGBTs, highlighting significant developments such as the introduction of the first enhancement mode transistors, the dependability of the GaN MISFET gate oxide, and the extension into high-voltage EV applications. With growing vertical GaN, MISFETs, and GaN-on-Si, which overcome the limits of early HEMTs for better voltage ratings and reliability to replace and exceed Si MOSFETs and IGBTs, GaN enables higher-frequency switching and current density compared to Si devices.
GaN-based power devices first appeared in 2000, with the GaN FET being manufactured on a SiC substrate utilizing radio frequency standards. Following that, with the advancement of material growth techniques, GaN power devices have made a quantum jump in quality [136]. GaN has a strong atomic junction because it is made up of nitrogen, a light element. Their net parameter, which refers to the distance between atomic unit cells and their crystalline structure within the same material, is less than that of other semiconductors from the III–V groups of the periodic table [137]. As a result, GaN has better electrical properties than Si dioxide.
A switch to GaN technology will assist in fulfilling demand while reducing carbon emissions as the world’s energy needs grow. It has been demonstrated that the design and integration of GaN may provide next-generation power semiconductors with a carbon footprint 10 times less than that of slower, older Si chips, as shown in Figure 8. In order to strengthen the argument for GaN, it is predicted that switching all data centers from Si to GaN will cut energy loss by 30–40%, resulting in savings of over 100 TWhr and 125 Mtons of CO2 by 2030 [138].
GaN has appeal for reasons other than only operational performance and system-level efficiency gains. GaN offers a strong “green” edge over older, slower Si because a GaN power IC chip could save 80% in manufacturing and process chemicals and energy and more than 50% in packaging.
Currently, GaN wafer diameters of 2″ have been obtained at a cost that is 10 times that of SiC and up to 100 times that of Si [139]. However, in contrast to SiC, GaN has been widely used in optoelectronics and radio frequency applications due to its broad energy band and potential high-frequency properties [140]. A lot of electronics, such as radio transmitters, plasma generators, MRI scanners, power converters, and wireless power transfer (WPT), among many others, depend on radio frequency (RF) power [141]. GaN’s wide bandgap, huge critical electric field, strong electron mobility, and reasonably good thermal conductivity make it appealing for high-voltage, high-frequency, and high-temperature applications. GaN-based materials can emit light in various visible wavelengths (violet, blue, and green), as well as for high frequency and high-power applications, due to their wide range of energy bandgap [142,143,144].
GaN and its alloys, such as AlGaN and InGaN, were the subject of much research. Other options are used, including Si, sapphire, and SiC substrates, which are less expensive. These substrate materials match the lattice properly and are thermally compatible with GaN. GaN-based devices are currently commercialized in the photonics field, although this semiconductor material is still in the early stages of development for power applications. Due to their cheaper cost, GaN rectifiers on Si or sapphire substrates, and their remarkable trade-off between on-resistance and breakdown voltage, these devices have gained much attention in recent years. For 600 V and lower voltage applications, the GaN heterojunction field-effect transistor (HFET) has been commercially introduced [145,146]. The source and drain contacts are interconnected using many metal layers. Another notable WBG material is GaN, which has features ideal for power device applications. Early GaN HFETs are depletion mode devices; to achieve an enhancement device, a cascade setup with a Si MOSFET will be required [146].
Over the past ten years, GaN has risen to the top of the materials used to make power devices. Next-generation power devices use the compound semiconductor material GaN. Due to its advantages over Si-based devices, such as outstanding high-frequency characteristics, it is starting to be adopted [147]. GaN is a fantastic material for fabricating high-speed/high-voltage components since it has the widest energy gap, critical field, and saturation velocity among semiconductors for which power devices are already on the market [148]. Without doping, a two-dimensional electron plasma with high mobility and a high channel density is created using AlGaN/GaN heterostructures. The presence of spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization makes this possible.
Additionally, the ability to build these devices on large-size, cheaper Si substrates offers a financial benefit that enables one to use Si CMOS equipment and affordable facilities [149]. Subsequently, due to their low switching charges and parasitic capacitances, GaN transistors have lower switching and resistive losses [148]. Device scaling and monolithic integration, which have advantages in terms of downsizing, enable a high-frequency operation. Since GaN is a more recent material than Si, it is crucial to fully understand and characterize the trapping and deteriorating processes in order to increase device stability and dependability [148]. GaN-based devices are currently commercialized in the photonics field, although this semiconductor material is still in the early stages of development for power applications.

4.1. GaN Diode

The advancement of the GaN substrate in recent years has been the driving force behind the development of vertical GaN-based devices. The vertical GaN diode, on the other hand, has, at this early stage, become a hot research area due to the relatively immature technology for the vertical triode [150]. Vertical GaN SBDs are similar to AlGaN/GaN SBDs in that they both exhibit low conduction loss and high switching speeds with little reverse recovery time in frequency fields [151,152]. However, the latter has a higher current density and fewer leakage paths.
The bulk of GaN Schottky power diodes disclosed up to this point feature either lateral or quasi-vertical layouts because there are not many GaN substrates with electrical conductivity [153]. Although the forward voltage drop is still significant, lateral GaN rectifiers have shown breakdown voltages as high as 9.7 kV on sapphire substrates [154]. GaN rectifiers constructed on Si or sapphire substrates are quite popular because of their lower cost. Due to the recent availability of high-temperature HVPE (hydride vapor phase epitaxy) free-standing GaN substrates, 600 V operating voltage GaN Schottky diodes are soon to be made available on the market to compete with SiC Schottky rectifiers [155]. In addition, commercial GaN Schottky diodes operating in the 600 V to 1.2 kV voltage range will be made available by the industry very soon. JBS GaN diodes, however, could enhance the performance of GaN-based power rectifiers in the 600 V to 3.3 kV range; however, contact resistance to implanted p-type GaN still needs to be reduced [156].
There are two types of GaN power diodes: the GaN Schottky barrier diode (SBD) and the GaN power diode (PN). When a typical GaN power rectifier is turned on, electrons must pass over the Schottky barrier of the SBD, resulting in a high turn-on voltage that is incompatible with lowering device losses [151]. Rapid progress in the growth and fabrication of vertical GaN (v-GaN) diodes has been made in the past few years, with the device unipolar figures of merit (UFOMs) exceeding those of SiC [157,158,159,160]. As the peak electric field is present primarily in the bulk rather than along the surface as in lateral devices, v-GaN diodes can operate in systems requiring higher-voltage hold-off. This enables competition with SiC and Si diodes in voltage regimes above 600 V [161].
The vertical structure is extensively employed in general-purpose power electronic devices that can provide a higher current. This structure includes the benefits of both lateral and vertical structures, but it also has the downsides of both. Its advantage is that it can be used with existing processes and can be created in large sizes [162]. Dang et al. reported Au/Pt-GaN Schottky diodes with up to 550 V breakdown voltage in 2000 [163]. In 2009, Arslan et al. used the metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) technology to make a Ni/Au-AlGaN/GaN heterojunction Schottky diode and examined its current transport under various temperature settings [164]. The first GaN commercial integrated power devices, the iP2010 and iP2011, were developed in 2010 by US International Rectifier, based on the GaN SBD technology platform—GaNpowIR. Micro GaN, a German business, launched the 600 V line of products for high-power, high-voltage applications in 2010, which included the Schottky diode MGG1TO617. Its turn-on voltage, turn-on resistance, and drain-source voltages are all less than 0.3 V, 329 m, and 600 V, respectively, and the leakage current is only 1 mA, reducing switching losses significantly. It has been used in aerospace and defense, power conversion, and traction application [165].
In 2011, EPC Corporation released its GaN line of products, with a maximum voltage of 300 V and a low on-resistance of only 150 m. Sanken Electric, a Japanese company, uses GaN-based SBD and HEMT solutions in DC/DC converters and plans to introduce 600 V diodes in 2012. Panasonic and Sharp have since released 600 V GaN-based SBDs. With the help of ARPA-E (American Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency) and the military, Avogy, now Nexgen Power Systems, is rapidly expanding its product line to include not only 600 V GaN SBD commercial products but also 1700 V PN-type diodes, which are used in solar and wind energy inverters, electric vehicles, power conversion, and aerospace applications [166]. Avogy’s commercial GaN diode products are shown in Table 13. Because the technique for forming PN junctions on GaN materials is still in its beginning, in order to improve device performance and get over the limits of basic GaN SBDs and p-n diodes, several high-tech vertical GaN power rectifiers were created. Basic p-n diodes have a high forward voltage drop and a big reverse recovery current, whereas basic SBDs have significant reverse leakage and low breakdown voltage as downsides [167].

4.2. GaN MOSFET

Five commercial GaN MOSFETs’ characteristics are included in Table 14, along with their component numbers, maximum current ratings in Amps, input capacitances (CISS) in pF, gate-drain capacitances (CGD) in pF, and drain-source on-state resistances (Rds(on)) in Ohms. The high electron mobility and current density of GaN enable GaN MOSFETs to achieve extremely low on-resistances, such as 0.035 Ohms for a 40 A device, as shown in the table. However, compared to the equivalent Si MOSFETs, input and gate capacitances are larger, which can reduce the performance of high-frequency switching.
For the vertical GaN MOSFETs, the cell pitch of our GaN MOSFETs is around 3–5 times larger than that of the SiC MOSFETs [168]. At the same time, lateral GaN MOSFETs benefit from consistent and broad conduction band migration in high-voltage power switching, making them less vulnerable to hot electron injection and a better replacement for SiC MOSFETs and GaN HEMTs. Although our GaN MOSFETs’ cell pitch is too wide, the performance of the vertical GaN trench MOSFETs is in line with the top SiC MOSFET performance. However, compared to SiC devices, the doping concentrations of GaN FETs are relatively lower [169].

4.3. GaN Heterojunction Field-Effect Transistor (HEFT)

GaN heterostructure field-effect transistors (HFETs), a kind of wide bandgap semiconductor electronic components, are popular in high-frequency and high-power applications due to their advantages of having a high breakdown voltage and high electron mobility [134,135]. Vertical power devices based on GaN material are still at a very early research stage [136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148], and there are currently no commercial vertical power devices accessible due to the difficulty in producing low-cost GaN epitaxial wafers, which is required to construct vertical power devices.
The market adoption of normally off GaN-based power electronics solutions will also be influenced by the reduction of material costs and the enhancement of material quality, both of which impact the dependability of the devices. Accordingly, significant research efforts by the scientific community would be needed over the following years to achieve a thorough knowledge of the physics of GaN-based materials and devices [149]. Nitride-based electrical devices show great promise due to their high electron mobility and saturation velocity, high sheet carrier concentration at heterojunction interfaces, strong breakdown field, and low thermal impedance of GaN-based films produced over SiC or bulk aluminum nitride (AlN) substrates [150]. It is predicted that the specific on-state resistance (Ron) of FETs will be lower than that of Si or gallium arsenide. FETs with very low on-state resistance are very effective for low-loss power-switching devices like inverters.

4.4. GaN High Electron Mobility Transistor (HEMT)

GaN HEMTs are aggressively used in high-performance compact power supplies for fast chargers, data centers, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), and other applications because they exhibit exceptional performance as power-switching devices, including ultrahigh switching frequencies and high conversion efficiency [16,170]. It is important to note that the on-state losses and switching losses can greatly decrease while maintaining the desired normally off feature in a cascade GaN HEMT built from a high-voltage D-mode GaN HEMT and a high-speed, low-voltage, and Si MOSFET [170]. It is rather relatively simple since controlling a cascade GaN HEMT is identical to driving a Si-MOSFET. On the other hand, due to E-mode GaN HEMT’s high voltage and current slew rates, low threshold voltage, and low allowed gate voltages, operating an E-mode GaN HEMT requires considering several complex parameters. A negative driving voltage can be utilized to assure successful turn-off operations, although it may increase reverse conduction loss and require additional power supply units. A decent alternative is a voltage clamp [170].
Due to their rapid switching speed and low conduction losses, GaN HEMT are particularly appealing for high-frequency applications. Because there are no impurities (dopants) in the 2DEG area, electron mobility is high, allowing for low resistance and quick switching. The majority of GaN-HEMT transistors are lateral structures. In the heterojunction formed by GaN, the polarization electric field significantly modulates the distribution of energy bands and charges; GaN heterojunction field effect transistors dominate the GaN transistor. The device structure is also called HEMT [171].

4.4.1. Enhanced GaN HEMT

Due to the polarization characteristics of the conventional GaN HEMT, in the most used voltage-type power converter, power switches are required to be in a normally off state from the perspective of safety and energy saving, so a lot of research work is now focused on implementing enhanced GaN HEMT devices. When the enhanced GaN HEMT is in a normally off state, short circuit elimination techniques are widely used for protection [172,173,174]. At present, large international semiconductor companies, such as America’s MicroGaN, Transphorm, EPC, Germany’s Infineon, Japan’s Panasonic, and Canada’s GaN systems, have introduced GaN HEMT devices, the highest voltage reaching 1200 V.

4.4.2. High-Voltage Cascade GaN HEMT

As mentioned, GaN devices now play a role in high-voltage applications due to the introduction of high-voltage cascade GaN HEMTs. As illustrated in Figure 9, the cascade structure combines a high-voltage normally-on GaN HFET and a low-voltage normally-off type Si MOSFET into a new mixing tube, resulting in a normally off state [175]. It is a voltage-controlled device in which the gate is activated, 2DEG is produced, and the transistor is turned on when the negative voltage between the gate and the source is greater than the threshold voltage. The transistor switches off when the voltage between the gate and the source is less than the threshold voltage. Because the on-state and switching losses of Cascode GaN HEMTs are relatively low, and the diode has stronger reverse recovery properties than Si MOSFETs, the power system’s efficiency can be greatly improved [175].
Table 15 lists the parameters for GaN HEMTs, GaN MISFETs, and GaN Schottky diodes. Bandgap, electron mobility, voltage/current ratings, switching frequency, and power losses are just a few comparisons made. High critical electric field, high current density, and high frequency switching are some of GaN devices’ key benefits over Si, while thermal conductivity and lattice mismatch still present problems. GaN HEMTs and diodes enable high-frequency performance, and MISFETs, which aim to replace Si MOSFETs and IGBTs, offer greater dependability.

4.5. Applications of GaN

Long-employed in the manufacture of RF and LED components, GaN is now becoming more widely accepted in various power-switching and conversion applications. GaN-based ICs may meet this requirement by delivering reliable operation at greater temperatures, saving space, and enhancing system performance and efficiency. The innovative semiconductor material GaN has received much attention and is used extensively in many different sectors. GaN outperforms conventional Si-based devices in terms of power efficiency, speed, and durability due to its special characteristics, including high electron mobility, broad bandgap, and high breakdown voltage.
The power GaN development market is predicted to increase from $126 million in 2021 to $2 billion in 2027, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 59%, according to market research firm Yole Développement [176], which is shown in Figure 10. The consumer sector, which includes fast chargers, Class-D audio, power banks, and time-of-flight sensors in smartphones and tablets, will contribute significantly to this expansion. GaN offers greater power density, improved thermal efficiency, and more compact and lightweight solutions in various applications. The convergence is driving growth in the telecom/datacom and automotive/mobility sectors to a 48 V power supply in both high-power density computers and vehicle DC–DC converters. Data centers need less power when using 48 V systems, and GaN performs better under these conditions than Si does. Manufacturers of solar microinverters, optimizers, and energy storage systems are increasingly developing using GaN for improved efficiency, higher power density, and increased dependability as the adoption of renewable energy sources quickens. A number of firms, including BRC Solar and Solarnative, have introduced GaN-based solutions.
There is a critical need for energy-efficient solutions due to the expansion of the cloud and rising demand for data centers. Using GaN technology, which enables a single-stage power conversion process and eliminates the intermediary step of converting power from 48 V to 12 V, is one option to deal with the problem. Significant energy savings are provided by this direct conversion from 48 V to the necessary 1 V at the point of load. GaN technology is also used in autonomous cars, especially in LIDAR systems. GaN technology accelerates the transmission of laser beams, improving lidar’s resolution and mapping capabilities and paving the way for autonomous vehicles and augmented reality applications. Devices made of GaN are widely used in a variety of industries. GaN is useful for ion thrusters, solar power conversion, robotics, and lidar in space due to its built-in radiation tolerance. GaN is also transforming motor drives, making it possible for eMobility, personal robots, and drones to have smaller, lighter, and more effective systems [176]. GaN-based power solutions improve the efficiency and dependability of solar micro-inverters and energy storage devices in renewable energy. GaN’s wireless power sources aid medical technology by enhancing implanted device charging and allowing portable imaging equipment for procedures like colonoscopies and MRI scans. The development of wireless power, which enables wireless device charging and is revolutionizing our way of life for everything from smartphones to home appliances, is also being fueled by GaN.
GaN RF components are used in phones and laptops to send and receive GSM and WiFi signals, and GaN is increasingly being used in the chargers and adapters that power these devices. The mobile fast-charging industry is the biggest market for power GaN at the moment. GaN power ICs can enable three times quicker charging in adapters that are half as big and heavy as sluggish, Si-based solutions. Additionally, the retail launch price of GaN for single-output chargers is around half that of earlier best-in-class Si chargers and up to three times cheaper for multi-output chargers.
Servers in data centers are also using GaN power semiconductors. Si’s capacity to handle electricity effectively and efficiently encounters ‘physical material’ barriers as data center traffic increases. Consequently, high-speed GaN integrated circuits (ICs) replace the outdated, sluggish Si chip. Major gains in efficiency are made possible by the consolidation of data center technology, a novel HVDC design strategy, and the well-proven dependability of highly integrated, mass-produced GaN power ICs. Global Si-to-GaN data center upgrades are predicted to cut energy loss by 30–40%, resulting in over 100 TWhr and 125 Mtons of CO2 emissions saved by 2030, shown in Figure 11 [138]. Therefore, using GaN marks another step toward the data center industry’s carbon net-zero aspirations.
GaN is becoming the preferred technology in the automotive sector for power conversion and battery charging in hybrid and electric cars. Inverters used in solar power installations, power conversion plans for motor drives, and other industrial applications increasingly use GaN-based power products. There has long been speculation that GaN will eventually replace Si power transistors. The application areas of GaN are electric vehicles, high-speed railways, household appliances, industrial motors, aerospace, smart grid, solar energy generation, wind power generation, and large capacity [141]. It is helpful for various RF applications, including satellite communications and 5G, 6G, and mobile communications, since it can operate at high frequencies, control high levels of power, and sustain a high operating voltage [177].
Moreover, GaN faced increased competition as a result of recent developments in Si SJ technology and the introduction of SiC power MOSFETs. In light of this, a reappraisal is necessary, especially in the 600 V domains involving all three [16]. The zero reverse recovery charge of lateral GaN HEMTs is one of its distinguishing characteristics. When the drain voltage drops below the total of the gate potential and the threshold voltage, a reverse channel is formed since there are no p-n junctions and current flows in a polarization-induced 2DEG [16]. Because of this property, GaN HEMTs are the best option for applications requiring continuous switching on a reverse-biased device, such as in half-bridge or full-bridge topologies. The suitability of GaN HEMTs for dual-gate structures to achieve bidirectional blocking and conducting devices [178] or to integrate multiple power devices on a common die, which makes it easier to achieve higher integration levels than with discrete components, is another intriguing feature of these devices [179].

4.6. Challenges of GaN Power Device

There are still various difficulties to overcome in order to replace Si technology and become mainstream. By raising the switching frequencies, GaN transistors can produce power-switching systems that are extremely compact and highly efficient [180]. GaN devices are now making excellent strides and making their way into the market, but several issues must be addressed. Vertical GaN power devices with breakdown voltages greater than 5 kV are possible as a result of advancements in substrate technology and field engineering optimization. It is also necessary to examine how the breakdown mechanism in these devices came to be [181]. Due to its potential to revolutionize power electronics with increased efficiency, better power densities, and quicker switching rates compared to conventional Si devices, GaN power devices have attracted a lot of interest in recent years. However, the development of GaN power devices faces the following major obstacles.

4.6.1. Material Growth

GaN-based power devices are built on high-quality epitaxial material. SiC and sapphire have a smaller lattice misfit and greater thermal conductivity than Si, critical benefits for high-power devices [181]. Although the lattice mismatch between Si and GaN is substantial, its cost is modest, and the lattice mismatch can be mitigated by introducing a buffer layer for stress management, which restricts its applicability. The relationship between the thermal expansion coefficient of GaN and common substrates is shown in Figure 12 as a function of the lattice constant.

4.6.2. Suppression of Current Collapse Effect

The current collapse effect of AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices poses a severe threat to GaN power device success. It is also one of the biggest issues with today’s GaN power devices. As illustrated in Figure 13, when a significant bias is given to the drain, the leakage current degrades [182,183]. At present, the mechanism of the current collapse effect of GaN devices largely includes the following types:
  • The current collapse is triggered by carrier traps caused by deep-level centers in the material.
  • The 2DEG concentration in the AlGaN/GaN conductive channel decreases due to the change in polarization charge generated by the surface state and the surface effect, resulting in current collapse.
  • Because the material structure and the energy band structure boundary are so essential, even a minor disruption will cause the 2DEG to collapse [184,185].

4.6.3. Packaging

GaN power devices have garnered considerable attention in recent years due to their exceptional performance compared to traditional Si-based devices. These devices offer superior power density, rapid switching speeds, reduced on-resistance, and enhanced thermal conductivity. Appropriate packaging solutions are essential for handling their distinctive properties and optimize their performance to ensure their efficient and dependable operation. Packaging plays a vital role in safeguarding GaN power devices against external factors like moisture, temperature fluctuations, mechanical strain, and electrical interference. It also facilitates efficient heat dissipation and establishes electrical connections with the device. A common approach for packaging GaN power devices involves utilizing surface-mount technology (SMT) packages [186]. These packages typically employ ceramic or plastic materials with a metal lead frame or solder balls for electrical connections. The package design comprises a die attach area where the GaN power device chip is mounted, bond wires or flip-chip connections to establish electrical connections, and thermal vias or heat sinks to enhance heat dissipation.
The package encompasses a ceramic or plastic body with metal leads or solder balls for electrical connections. The GaN device chip is affixed to the die attach pad at the package’s center. Electrical connections between the chip and the leads or solder balls are established using bond wires or flip-chip connections. The package may also incorporate heat sink structure to augment heat dissipation. Package designs can vary depending on the specific application and power requirements. For high-power applications, packages with larger thermal vias, enhanced heat sink structures, and improved thermal interface materials may be employed to manage increased power dissipation effectively.
Furthermore, the ongoing exploration of packaging technologies for GaN power devices aims to further enhance their performance. This involves the development of advanced materials with superior thermal conductivity, innovative interconnection like copper clip bonding or direct copper bonding, and novel package designs to minimize parasitic inductance and capacitance. Moreover, the packaging of GaN power devices is crucial for their development, ensuring reliability, efficient thermal management, and optimal electrical performance. Continued innovation in packaging techniques aim to overcome unique challenges and unlock the full potential of GaN power devices in various applications, including power electronics, automotive systems, and renewable energy.

4.6.4. Gate Driver

The gate drive function assumes a critical role in the operation and performance of GaN power devices, exerting control over device switching by supplying the appropriate voltage and current signals to the gate terminal of the GaN transistor. It is imperative to meticulously design the gate drive circuitry to ensure the efficient and dependable operation of GaN power devices. Considerations related to the gate drive for GaN power devices are outlined as follows:
  • Voltage and Current Levels: GaN power devices typically necessitate higher gate voltage levels in comparison to conventional Si-based devices. Operating with gate voltages ranging from 6 V to 10 V or even higher, the gate drive circuitry must be capable of generating and sustaining these elevated voltage levels. GaN power devices exhibit low gate capacitance, enabling faster switching but demanding careful attention to the gate driver’s current capability.
  • Gate Driver ICs: GaN power devices often employ specialized gate driver integrated circuits (ICs). These ICs are specifically designed to deliver the required voltage and current levels, incorporate protection features, and enhance the overall performance of GaN transistors. Protection features may include under-voltage lockout (UVLO), over-current protection, and short-circuit protection to ensure device safety during operation.
  • High-Speed Switching: GaN power devices are renowned for their rapid switching speeds, which can present challenges in gate drive design. To achieve optimal performance, the gate drive circuitry must be capable of providing high-speed rise and fall times to minimize switching losses. This necessitates meticulous consideration of the gate driver’s output impedance, gate trace layout, and the impact of parasitic elements in the gate circuit.
  • Gate Resistance: The appropriate selection of gate resistance is crucial for GaN power devices. A suitable gate resistor aids in dampening ringing effects and mitigating the risk of oscillations in the gate voltage waveform. It also limits current during switching transitions to prevent excessive power dissipation. The value of the gate resistor should be carefully optimized based on the specific GaN device and application requirements.
  • Gate Layout and Layout Considerations: A well-designed gate layout is essential in order to minimize parasitic inductances and capacitances that can negatively impact device performance. This entails keeping gate traces as short as possible, reducing loop areas, and employing techniques like guard rings and vias to manage parasitic effects. An optimized gate layout contributes to faster switching speeds, lower losses, and overall improvement in device performance.
Table 16 compares features, including split outputs, bootstrap voltage control, and target applications for five common GaN driver ICs from top manufacturers that drive GaN FETs in half-bridge designs. With configurations ranging from general purpose to automotive-qualified, the drivers offer crucial gate drive isolation and enhanced GaN switching performance as GaN transistors become more prevalent in power supply and upcoming electric vehicle applications [187,188]. The advantages of GaN FETs’ high-frequency capability and efficiency can be maximized with the right choice of GaN driver.

4.6.5. Electrical Insulation

In order to maintain adequate electrical isolation between various components, avoid electrical leakage, and improve the device’s overall dependability and safety, electrical insulation is a crucial component in the development of GaN power devices. Figure 14 illustrates challenges associated with electrical isolation for GaN devices. Barriers that withstand high voltages and prevent accidental electrical hookups are made using insulation materials and procedures. As it guarantees dependable operation and provides protection from electrical failure, electrical insulation is essential for the development of GaN power devices. Dielectric materials having sufficient dielectric strength, thermal stability, and compatibility are used to create insulation between conductive components. Insulation layers, edge isolation techniques, and the proper packaging insulation are utilized to prevent short circuits, lessen parasitic effects, and maintain electrical integrity. By giving effective electrical insulation first importance, GaN power devices may increase performance and operational reliability in many applications.

4.6.6. Electromagnetic Interference

GaN power device development is heavily concerned with electromagnetic interference (EMI), as these devices can produce high-frequency switching signals that could travel as undesired electromagnetic emissions and interact with other electronic systems. To ensure the proper operation of GaN power devices and avoid interference with nearby devices or delicate electronic equipment, EMI management is essential.
  • EMI Sources: Fast switching transitions caused by GaN power devices result in high-frequency harmonics and transient currents. These may produce electromagnetic emissions that spread through the design of the device, the circuit traces, and the connections to the outside world. During switching events, voltage peaks, ringing, and current loops are the main EMI causes in GaN power devices.
  • EMI Mitigation Techniques: Several techniques are employed to mitigate EMI in GaN power devices. These include:
    • Filtering: The use of passive components such as capacitors, inductors, and ferrite beads to suppress high-frequency noise and attenuate unwanted harmonics.
    • Shielding: Incorporating shields, conductive enclosures, or grounded metal layers around sensitive components to contain electromagnetic fields and prevent their propagation.
    • Layout Optimization: Carefully consider trace routing, component placement, and grounding techniques to minimize loop areas, reduce parasitic inductance, and control impedance.
    • Grounding and Bonding: Establishing proper grounding and bonding practices to minimize ground loops, reduce voltage differentials, and provide an effective return path for high-frequency currents.
  • Compliance with EMI Standards: GaN power devices must adhere to particular electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) requirements to ensure their functioning is below acceptable EMI limits. Evaluations of radiated emissions conducted emissions, and vulnerability to outside electromagnetic fields are all part of compliance testing.
  • EMI Filtering Components: Choosing the right EMI filtering components is essential when creating GaN power devices. These parts must be tuned for the device’s working frequency range, have high-frequency filtering capabilities and low parasitic elements, and be parasite-free.
  • EMI Simulation and Modeling: EMI behavior in GaN power devices may be predicted and examined using simulation and modeling techniques throughout the design process. Using these technologies, engineers may reduce EMI problems by optimizing circuit design, filtering tactics, and grounding procedures.

4.7. Future Trend of GaN

Due to the relatively recent industrial introduction of GaN, future developments are a crucial topic of discussion when examining the potential uses of this technology in various applications [189]. The high cost of these devices, the current GaN devices’ limited voltage rating, the complex gate driver design and control complexity, the area-specific thermal resistance in GaN-based IC development, and packaging issues to ensure these devices’ long-term reliability present the biggest challenges and areas for improvement. Below, each of these elements is explored to determine where GaN’s future lies [190]. However, GaN will ultimately replace old Si in data centers, home solar energy systems, and other consumer applications like fast chargers and other consumer applications. GaN technology will be used more frequently in electric vehicles’ onboard chargers [191].

4.7.1. Cost Reduction

GaN devices can be manufactured on Si substrates, a standard industry procedure today, to address the cost issue connected with GaN. GaN’s attractive material features and the development of fabrication facilities that are compatible with complementary metal-oxide semiconductors (CMOS) work together to provide power devices that perform better and are more affordable. Increased demand for power converter applications may result from the development of high-power ICs using GaN on Si wafers, which can further lower these costs [192].
As semiconductor technology has advanced since the commercialization of GaN technology, the unit cost of these transistors has dropped considerably. For instance, manufacturers like GaN Systems now sell the 650 V, 15 A e-mode GaN for around $12, whereas, formerly, a standalone GaN MOSFET had a unit price of about $75. This demonstrates that, as more power electronics applications adopt GaN technology, the cost is anticipated to drop further during the ensuing years due to economies of scale. GaN HEMTs can be widely used in power electronics due to their low cost, which greatly improves the performance and efficiency of electrified transportation mediums, lowering the entire system cost. Therefore, GaN HEMTs are more advantageous than they are expensive, effectively resulting in cost savings for production and operation [190].

4.7.2. Thermal Management

The vertical GaN devices feature higher breakdown voltage and current than the lateral GaN designs without growing the chip’s size. Vertical structures are more dependable. In addition, vertical GaN devices have easier thermal management than lateral ones [190]. Vertical GaN structures have many advantages, and a lot of research and development is being carried out to make these structures commercially viable. When working with GaN devices, thermal management is a crucial concern. In the development of GaN-based ICs, minimizing area-specific thermal resistance is crucial. Future GaN device technologies are anticipated to use diamond and SiC substrates with strong heat conductivity [191]. The terminals of lateral GaN on Si substrate devices are on the same side of the die.
As a result, these chips have bumps added to them for mounting purposes. These bumps only cover a small percentage of the die surface area and have a low thermal conductivity. Either through these bumps, known as topside cooling, or through their Si substrate material, known as backside cooling, the GaN transistors are cooled. The top side of the die has the greatest thermal performance for thermal dissipation [191]. Future designs of highly competitive power electronic converters might include a phase-leg power module based on GaN devices that incorporates the power stage, the gate driver control circuitry, and the cooling system into a single container based on the present integrated modules [191]. The combined module will have enhanced thermal management and high-power capacity. These modules might address some of the problems that electric transportation is now experiencing, as previously mentioned [189].

4.7.3. Gate Driver Design

The first GaN power IC Process Design Kit (PDK), which is known as All GaNTM, enables the monolithic integration of 650 V GaN IC circuits with GaN MOSFETs. The integration of the GaN driver with the GaN MOSFET is crucial for high-frequency operation. Due to its fast-switching transitions, the discrete GaN’s gate is susceptible to noise and voltage spikes, which can lead to damage. Noise can be reduced to some extent by integrating the GaN MOSFET with the driver. However, the GaN MOSFET’s inclusion in a multi-chip module is not without its difficulties, as larger losses are caused by the impedance between the GaN MOSFET’s gate and the Si driver output. The best possible efficiency, speed, and robustness can be attained with monolithic integration [189]. Since the driver is integrated, one module can contain the logic circuitry, startup protection, dv/dt control, and dv/dt robustness. Two MOSFETs are combined with the driving and protection circuitry in half-bridge power ICs. The level-shifter losses are 10 times lower with the 650 V GaN power IC than Si [190]. The development of more efficient, more powerful, and less expensive power systems will be made possible by next-generation monolithic integration, which includes enhanced I/O features, over-current, and over-temperature protection [190].
In the near future, it is anticipated that gate drivers with inbuilt short circuit protection will be developed. This is particularly helpful in applications that adopt a modular approach, in which case the size of the parallelized packages is crucial. For instance, aircraft DC/DC converters are frequently built using the modular technique. The size of the power electronic components designed for industry continues to shrink as a result of advances in semiconductor technology. More power-dense DC/DC converter designs are possible with integrated gate drivers. GaN HEMT gate drive design calls for meticulous design considerations. For turn-on and turn-off, a separate gate resistor is usually advised. This is significant because the RGON has control over the dv/dt slew rate. The turn-on gate resistor’s value must be carefully chosen because, if it is too high, switching will be slowed down and result in larger switching losses, and, if it is too low, gate oscillation will cause more switching losses. It is suggested that the turn-off gate resistor, RGOFF, for GaN System’s GS66508 be between 10 and 20ω. RGOFF enables quick pull-down for a powerful gate drive and starts from 1 to 2ω. Figure 15 depicts a general layout of the gate driver schematic [193].

4.7.4. Motor Drive

Because of its exceptional features, GaN has been suggested as a legitimate substitute for conventional Si-based MOSFETs and IGBTs in the motor control field. GaN technology offers effective, light, and low-footprint solutions with up to 1000 times the switching frequency of Si and lower conduction and switching losses. GaN power transistors have a switching speed that can reach 100 V/ns, which allows engineers to employ inductors and capacitors with lower values and smaller sizes [194]. Low RDS(on) improves energy efficiency and enables more compact dimensions by reducing the amount of heat produced. GaN-based devices require capacitors with greater working voltages, higher dV/dt transient tolerance, and lower equivalent series resistance [194] than Si-based devices do. GaN has a high breakdown voltage (50–100 V, as opposed to the typical 5 to 15 V values attainable with conventional semiconductors), enabling power devices to run at greater input energies and voltages without harm. This is an additional benefit that GaN offers. It may reach a wider bandwidth with higher switching frequencies, which enables the implementation of motor control algorithms with greater precision. Additionally, it is possible to attain a degree of efficiency with variable frequency drive (VFD) motor control that is not possible with ordinary Si MOSFETs and IGBTs. Subsequently, because the motor speed can be ramped up and down, the load may be maintained at the desired speed, and the VFD achieves an incredibly accurate speed control. Because GaN transistors switch significantly more quickly than their Si counterparts, parasitic inductances and losses are reduced, switching performance is improved (less than 2-ns rise and fall time), and the heat sink can be reduced in size or even eliminated. Very low switching losses in the GaN power stage enable greater pulse width modulation (PWM) switching frequencies with a peak efficiency of up to 98.5% at 100 kHz PWM [194].

4.7.5. 5G

GaN can amplify high-frequency signals (even those of the order of a few gigahertzes) very effectively, which opens up several real and exciting opportunities in the RF industry. Thus, it is feasible to develop high-frequency amplifiers and transmitters that can travel great distances and have uses in base stations, satellite communications, radar, early warning systems, and other technologies [194]. In terms of increased capacity and efficiency, reduced latency, and all-around connectivity, 5G offers substantial advantages as the next-generation mobile technology. It is necessary to employ materials like GaN that can give high bandwidth, high power density, and excellent efficiency values for the use of various frequency bands, including the sub-6-GHz band and the millimeter-wave (mmWave) (above-24-GHz) band [194].
Due to its physical characteristics and crystalline structure, GaN can allow higher switching frequencies than comparable laterally diffused MOSFET devices at the same applied voltage, resulting in a substantially smaller footprint. RF front-end chipsets are necessary for emerging 5G technologies like massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), and mmWave. The greatest option for high-power 5G and RF applications is GaN-on-SiC, which combines the high power density of GaN with the excellent thermal conductivity and low RF losses of SiC. There are currently a number of GaN-based products appropriate for 5G applications on the market, including multiple channel switches and low-noise amplifiers for massive 5G MIMO applications [194].

4.7.6. Data Centers

In the data center industry, where high performance and cost reduction are fundamental concerns, the marriage of GaN with Si also presents significant prospects. Voltage converters are frequently used in data centers, where cloud servers run continuously, with typical values of 48 V, 12 V, and even lower voltages for powering the multiprocessor system cores [194]. Power-conversion efficiency has emerged as a crucial consideration for businesses looking to achieve net-zero carbon emission, especially those running data centers and providing cloud computing services. This is due to the constantly rising worldwide electricity generation. GaN technology may significantly address the need for more power in less space for data centers by attaining improved efficiency in converters and power supply, size reduction, and better thermal control, which lowers costs for the provider [194]. AC/DC converters are quite prevalent in data centers, which first regulate the bus voltage to a DC value using a power factor correction (PFC) front-end stage. Next, a DC/DC stage steps down the bus voltage and produces a galvanically isolated and controlled DC output (48 V, 12 V, and more). The PFC stage maximizes real power [194] by keeping the power supply’s input current synced with the main voltage.

5. Ultrawide Bandgap Semiconductor

AlGaN/AlN, diamond, and Ga2O3 are examples of ultrawide bandgap (UWBG) semiconductors, which have bandgaps that are substantially wider than those of traditional wide bandgap materials like SiC and GaN [195]. Due to their extraordinarily wide bandgaps, which allow for properties like high breakdown voltages, high operating temperatures, and high-power densities, these materials have the potential to lead to significant advancements in electrical and optoelectronic devices. In contrast to more established semiconductors like gallium arsenide and Si, UWBG materials are still in a very early stage. In areas like substrate availability, doping, comprehending carrier transport mechanics, and constructing useful devices, considerable obstacles need to be addressed.
As the bandgap increases, the figures of merit for devices like power switches scale positively, indicating that UWBG materials could permit improved performance. However, UWBG materials are still in their infancy and face formidable obstacles in areas including material production, doping, substrate accessibility, and fundamental physics comprehension. This article examines the current state-of-the-art and points out important areas for future research in material growth, physics, devices, and applications.
Creating large-diameter native substrates, comprehending growth dynamics, and attaining controlled doping, particularly p-type doping, are important issues in the field of materials. The creation of innovative UWBG materials such as BN alloys offers opportunities. To describe high-field carrier dynamics in UWBG materials, new transport physics models are required. It is also difficult to confine carriers using UWBG heterostructures. Opportunities exist in both TCAD modeling and thermal transfer. The need for advancements in vertical device topologies, contacts, packaging, and other areas makes applications like high-voltage power electronics, RF and microwave devices, deep UV optoelectronics, and severe environment electronics intriguing.
An overview of the advancement of semiconductors based on diamond from the 1980s to the present is shown in Table 17. It follows the development of early research devices, such as Schottky diodes built of single-crystal diamond, through more sophisticated polycrystalline diamond devices, such as vertical MOSFETs and lateral MOSFETs. The table lists each device’s significant accomplishments, technical details, and features.
Diamond bipolar transistors, diamond Schottky diodes, and diamond MISFETs are three different categories of diamond-based semiconductor devices that are compared in Table 18. The advantages of diamond’s high bandgap, high critical electric field, high thermal conductivity, and high breakdown voltage are shared by all three devices. Moreover, Table 18 highlights diamond devices’ high-voltage, high-power, high-temperature, and high-frequency working capabilities.

6. Current Innovation and Comparison

WBG and future UWBG semiconductors will be used to replace conventional Si power devices in the new generation of power devices for power converters. The commercial Si IGBT dominant power switch’s current maximum breakdown voltage capacity is 6.5 kV. In any case, a Si-based gadget could not function above 200 °C. These inescapable physical restrictions severely reduce the efficiency of modern power converters, necessitating, among other things, complicated and expensive cooling systems [196]. These novel power semiconductor materials can make electric energy transformations more efficient, leading to a more judicious use of electricity and a smaller carbon impact.
SiC and GaN are the most desirable candidates among the WBG semiconductors because they already offer a good compromise between their theoretical properties (blocking voltage capability, operation temperature, and switching frequency) and commercial presence [15]. Both are ideal candidates to replace Si in the following wave of high-power and high-frequency electronics due to their wide bandgaps, resulting in higher breakdown voltage and operation temperature than Si [197].
Electrical quantities like voltage, frequency, and operating temperature define the application of the power system in power electronics. The physical characteristics of Si, SiC, GaN, and diamond materials are listed in Table 19 [198,199,200]. Furthermore, Table 19 compares key physical properties and device parameters of Si, SiC, GaN, and diamond semiconductors. It shows that wide bandgap semiconductors like SiC, GaN, and especially diamond have superior attributes like higher breakdown fields, thermal conductivity, and switching frequencies compared to Si, enabling high-power and high-frequency applications. Diamond has the greatest combination of properties overall such as a very high breakdown field and thermal conductivity.
The bandgaps of WBG semiconductors are roughly three times, and the electric field values of SiC polytypic and GaN are comparable and much greater than those of Si. Higher radiation hardening and high-temperature operation are advantages for WBG semiconductors. For Si, this occurs at a temperature of about 150 °C [201], where around 900 °C is the inherent temperature of 4H-SiC, and the temperature range between 300 °C and 800 °C has been used to test manufactured AlGaN/GaN HEMTs [202]. They can be utilized in harsh environments where Si-based devices are ineffective [203].
In comparison to Si, SiC, and GaN, diamond has an extraordinarily wide bandgap of 5.45 eV and the highest electrical breakdown field, thermal conductivity, electron velocity, and current density. This makes diamond an exceptional material for creating semiconductor devices with an extremely high power density, high frequency, and high temperature. To construct useful diamond electronic devices, however, significant obstacles still exist in creating large, high-quality diamond substrates and accomplishing doping and metallization. With certain manufacturing challenges, SiC and GaN also have very wide bandgaps when compared to Si, enabling high-voltage, high-power, and high-speed devices. Overall, these ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors promise to significantly outperform Si devices in terms of performance.
In the context of electronics, certain constraints that apply to optoelectronics are relaxed. For instance, the bandgaps of these materials do not need to be direct, making SiC a viable option. Additionally, light emission efficiency is not as critical for electronics, making GaN and aluminum GaN (AlGaN) suitable materials, not just indium GaN (InGaN) [17]. Among these materials, SiC has a longer history and has seen sustained investment since the late 1970s, particularly through the U.S. Department of Defense Office of Naval Research. This investment has led to significant advancements in SiC material synthesis and quality, as well as progress in various device technologies.
Over the past few years, 4H-SiC has drawn more attention as a suitable material for high-voltage power applications. The first Schottky barrier diode (SBD) was promoted in 2001, and this marked the realization of the SiC-based power electronics goal [204,205]. Photovoltaic (PV) inverters, power supply, and power factor correction circuits (PFC) are the main applications for SiC diodes. Figure 16 shows the variation of Vth for a 4H-SiC MOSFET with a nitridated SiO2 layer as a function of stress time and temperature.
Due to its sensitive gate dielectrics, the SiC MOSFET offers questionable reliability; the major issue is the comparably poor channel mobility. It is a suitable choice for the fabrication of power electronics devices with high break-down voltage, low specific RON, and high-frequency switching operations due to physical properties like a high saturation velocity and a high critical electric field [206]. GaNs’ stronger critical electric field and higher electron mobility should assure substantially superior efficiency compared to SiC [15]. The GaN HEMT is inherently a normally on device because of the existence of the 2DEG, which can be seen in Figure 17a,b [17].
In general, the AlGaN/GaN heterojunction typically generates a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) and a high sheet carrier density (of around 10 cm) as a result of piezoelectric polarization [207]. Moreover, HEMTs are devices whose functioning is predicated on the presence of 2DEG [15,204]. Developing well-engineered normally off GaN HEMT technologies, improving insulator/GaN interfaces, enhancing efficient metallization plans for GaN-on-Si frameworks, and other issues are a few of the difficulties.
Ultrawide bandgap (UWBG) semiconductors represent an interesting and difficult new field of study in semiconductor materials, physics, devices, and applications, with bandgaps considerably larger than the 3.4 eV of GaN [17]. Furthermore, these UWBG materials have the potential for far higher performance than standard WBG materials because many figures of merit for device performance scale with the increasing bandgap in a very non-linear way. The commonly used Baliga figure of merit (BFOM) [208] is defined as V2BR/RON-SP in the straightforward situation of a low-frequency unipolar vertical power switch, for instance, where RON-SP stands for the specific on-resistance, which is the inverse of the conductance per unit area while the switch is on [208,209]. The device’s capacity to block electricity while turned off and/or its conductivity per unit area when turned on increases with increasing BFOM. The BFOM scales as about the sixth power of the semiconductor bandgap because the critical electric field scales roughly as the square of the semiconductor bandgap.
To put this trio of materials in perspective, Table 20 lists some of their physical characteristics as well as the state-of-the-art values for three metrics crucial for device applications, for instance, the quality of their substrates as determined roughly by dislocations per square centimeter and substrate diameter, their capacity for p-type and n-type doping, and their capacity for n-type doping.
Moreover, Table 20. lists some of the material characteristics of WBG and UWBG semiconductors, as well as the most recent developments in the following areas, such as substrate dislocation density, substrate diameter, and bulk p-type and n-type doping levels [17]. From an electronics perspective, they possess the following advantageous features, for example, a wide range of direct bandgaps, spanning from 3.4 eV to approximately 6.0 eV; high breakdown fields, with AlN exhibiting values exceeding 10 MVcm−1; high electron mobility, reaching bulk mobilities of up to 1000 cm2V−1s−1; high saturation velocities exceeding 107 cms−1; and the relative ease of n-type doping with Si, which has a relatively small donor ionization energy, especially up to approximately 80–85% aluminum content [210,211].
From an optoelectronics perspective, AlGaN alloys enable the direct generation of emission wavelengths shorter than 365 nm, extending into the ultraviolet A, B, and C bands. Similarly, InGaN and AlGaN, are ternary alloys, which enables the use of heterostructures and bandgap engineering, a strategy successfully employed by other ternary alloys in the III–V materials family. UWBG applications, including high-power and high-frequency electronics, radiation detectors, electron emitters for ultra-high-voltage vacuum switches and traveling wave tube cathodes, and thermionic emitters for energy conversion, are all made possible by the exceptionally beneficial characteristics of diamond. As shown in Figure 18, lateral metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) devices have now been created using atomic-layer-deposited (ALD) dielectric layers, even though these air-exposed surfaces are noticeably unstable.
Diamond also holds the highest known thermal conductivity of any material, which is particularly significant because heat removal is a major limiting factor in the performance of many power electronics and optoelectronics applications. Excellent electron emissivity on hydrogen-terminated surfaces, surface transfer doping made possible by these surfaces, [15] room-temperature UV exciton emission, and optical defect centers brought on by the nitrogen-vacancy (N-V) and Si-vacancy (Si-V) complexes are a few additional special qualities. For emerging quantum information systems, these defect centers have been proposed as a physical platform for qubits [148].
Table 21 summarizes the state-of-the-art performance ranges for their respective technologies’ evaluated powers and frequencies. It is possible to observe the trends in the applications of SiC technologies at higher powers, as the finest performance range of the technology gradually increases with the levels of the current in the transistor, and of the GaN technology at higher switching frequencies and lower power levels.
A contemporary power semiconductor device switches rapidly between the ON and OFF states. A perfect switch may switch at any frequency and have no power losses in either the ON or OFF states. Losses do occur in practical devices, primarily in the ON state and during switching transitions. Three-terminal switches are required to produce the regulated ON and OFF transitions, with the third terminal controlling the transition by either supplying a voltage or a current signal. BJTs, thyristors, and gate turn-off (GTO) thyristors are current-controlled devices, whereas MOSFETs and IGBTs are voltage-controlled switches [213].
In contemporary power electronics converters, two terminal switches with unidirectional current flow capabilities, such as a diode, are also required. In general, the voltage and current ratings are any power device’s most crucial parameters. Switching speed is another important specification that may be used to compare device capabilities. Devices with different breakdown voltage ratings are created for applications requiring a range of voltage levels [213]. Power devices with breakdown voltages above 600 V are often needed for important industrial and renewable energy applications, such as PV, wind, EV, and industry motor drives. Power devices with a voltage rating between 20 V and 600 V are commonly used for power supply applications in computers, mobile computing devices, and data centers [213]. Since the performance heavily depends on the voltage rating of the device, different devices can only be compared when they are made for the same breakdown voltage.

6.1. Voltage Rating

Modern power semiconductor devices are made by vertically stacking several P-type and N-type semiconductor layers on a substrate crystal wafer. The chip’s main electrical terminals are on both sides. The switch function is accomplished by altering the device’s conductivity from high in the ON state to low in the OFF state. When the maximum electric field reaches a critical breakdown field Ec, the voltage rating is commonly specified as the breakdown voltage. The semiconductor material in question determines Ec. A large OFF-state leakage current will be observed if the breakdown is reached electrically. The operation voltage is often chosen to be substantially lower than the breakdown voltage, due to the necessity of enduring transient overvoltage spikes, as well as the converter’s long-term stability. The critical field Ec for Si is around 20 V/m, while Ec for broader bandgap materials like SiC and GaN is close to 300 V/m. For the three materials stated, this is graphically depicted in Figure 19.
The use of wider bandgap power devices such as SiC and GaN has several advantages, including greater Ec and other desirable material features such as higher thermal conductivity. The same breakdown can be obtained in SiC material with an inner depletion thickness of less than 70 m and a surface termination region of roughly 200 m. As a result, achieving exceptionally high breakdown voltage in SiC power devices is significantly easier.

6.2. Current Rating

When the device conducts current in the ON state, the generated heat is manageable and does not cause the device to surpass its maximum operating temperature. Device innovation is motivated by increasing current density for a given breakdown voltage. Comparing absolute voltage and current ratings is one technique to assess state-of-the-art power devices, particularly their commercial readiness. This is depicted in Figure 20 and Figure 21 for commercially available Si power devices and SiC and GaN power devices, respectively. Because of the excellent bipolar conduction mechanism in these two devices, the Si thyristor and Si diode have reached the highest voltage and current ratings. These two devices are also bundled in press-pack packaging and fabricated on a single wafer utilizing the level edge termination technique [215,216,217]. SiC and GaN power devices, first introduced to the market a decade ago, have made substantial progress in terms of commercially accessible voltage and current ratings. Clearly, there is still a significant disparity in the current ratings of Si power devices, as illustrated in Figure 20. As illustrated in Figure 21, hybrid devices built by Si IGBT and SiC diodes are being presented to fill this gap [218,219].

6.3. Switching Frequency

The power device in modern power converters must switch at high frequencies. Switching at higher frequencies has advantages such as improved dynamic response and smaller, lighter passive components. For high-density power electronics, reducing the size of passive components is crucial. As a result, switching frequency is another crucial metric to consider when comparing power devices. The device’s switching losses during turn-on and turn-off limit the switching frequency’s upper limit. As a result, the switching frequency is a tradeoff between conduction and switching loss, rather than a theoretical restriction on how fast the device can flip. Huang’s thermal figure of merit (HTFOM) in Table 22 can also be used as the switching frequency figure of merit (FOM). It indicates that hard-switching WBG switches will be limited in their frequency by poor thermal conductivity and/or small chip size [220]. Likewise, their chip size reductions have fallen short of the Huang chip area figure of merit (HCAFOM) prediction in Table 22.
Table 23 indicates that die size decreases significantly when technology advances from standard Si MOSFETs to SJ MOSFETs to SiC. SiC MOSFETs are around 20 times smaller than Si MOSFETs. The size reduction in GaN is less significant than in SiC since the GaN device is a lateral power device rather than a vertical power device, and its RON-SP decrease is lower. The greater die size, on the other hand, offers superior thermal performance. The lateral GaN has the added benefit of having a reduced capacitance/gate charge. The lateral structure is to blame for this. The SiC and GaN power devices are well-positioned to operate at higher frequencies in hard-switching or soft-switching converters due to significant reductions in DFOM1, DFOM2, and DFOM3.

6.4. Thin Wafer Field Stop IGBT (FS-IGBT)

IGBT technology became the essential notion virtually as soon as the planar power MOSFET was presented [221]. They are available in single switch and rotor configurations, with ratings ranging from 250 A to 1200 A. In motor control and drives, uninterruptible power supplies (UPS), transmission and distribution, commercial, construction, and agricultural vehicles (CAV), as well as traction uses, 4500 V and 6500 V IGBT modules are frequently used [222]. As a result, MOSFETs, GTOs, and BJTs have been rapidly phased out of medium- to high-power applications. In terms of technology, three decades of invention and industrialization have introduced various generations of IGBT technology. The implanted P collector is no longer reached by the depletion region. Eoff may be modified due to the implanted collector, which allows for control of minority carrier injection. The non-punch through (NPT) IGBT, on the other hand, has a longer drift layer, which increases forward voltage (Vf) once more [220].

6.5. Reverse Conducting IGBT (RC-IGBT)

Because IGBTs lack a reverse conduction path, an externally packaged freewheeling diode (FWD) is required to let the current flow in the other direction. The reverse recovery loss should be reduced, and the recovery softness must be improved according to key design factors. A new generation of IGBTs with inbuilt FWD has been released [223,224,225]. The thin wafer manufacturing technology established for the FS-IGBT is used in the RC-IGBT. An N region is created by interrupting the backside P collector. The RC-IGBT chip can now take up the entire module footprint in an RC-IGBT power module. The MOS-controlled diode investigated this MOS control characteristic many years ago [226,227,228].

6.6. Reverse Blocking IGBT

To inhibit reverse voltage, certain significant renewable energy converters, such as the T-NPC three-level converter [229], need an IGBT in series with a diode. Changes in the collector junction doping concentration and edge termination must be performed to enhance the voltage. Reverse blocking IGBT (RB-IGBT) is one such RB-IGBT [230]. The N buffer layer must be removed to enhance the reverse breakdown voltage, converting the IGBT to an NPT-IGBT. To minimize the surface/edge electric field in the reverse direction, a new termination will be required. Deep diffusion or epitaxial regrowth following a deep etch can produce the latter.

6.7. Integrated Gate Commutated Thyristor (IGCT)

Because of the clear advantages of constructing a high-power device in a single device wafer and the extremely dependable press-pack packaging process, the Si thyristor, or SCR, has been and continues to be the most powerful semiconductor switch ever created. Until high-power IGBTs superseded megawatt gate turn-off (GTO) converters operating at a few hundred hertz, the high-power industry was dominated by megawatt GTO converters. The GTO’s bad turnoff safe operation area (RBSOA) is one explanation for this. In the late 1990s, a substantial advancement was made to revitalize GTO technology. The GTO’s gate drive circuit was the center of the innovation. The device begins to turn off when the current reaches about a third of the anode current. The thyristor action is still active because there is roughly a 2/3 current in the cathode/emitter junction currently. ABB has recently enhanced the IGCT’s capabilities by incorporating an inbuilt freewheeling diode into the same wafer, resulting in a reverse conducting IGCT (RC-IGCT) [231]. The emitter turn-off (ETO) thyristor [232] aims to achieve unity gain turn-off. It is possible to accomplish a 5000 A snubber-less turnoff [233]. In case of emitter turn off thyristor (ETO), built-in current sensing is similarly simple to create, and the ETO, on the other hand, is currently not in commercial production [234].

6.8. Reliability and Application

Reliability and applications are critical factors to take into account in order to fully utilize wide bandgap power devices such as GaN and SiC in real-world systems. Significant improvements in power density, efficiency, and high-temperature operation are made possible by these devices. Robustness under dynamic switching conditions can be impacted by problems such as current collapse, threshold voltage instability, gate oxide breakdown, and electromigration. To reduce the negative effects on lifetime, adequate characterization and derating are required in addition to methods like gate drive optimization, sophisticated packaging, and layout strategies. For example, surface passivation and buffer layer modifications can reduce on-resistance degradation caused by current collapse [235]. By using field plates and optimizing dielectric thickness, gate reliability can be increased. GaN dies, substrates, and solders’ acoustic mismatch cause stresses and defects during heat cycling, necessitating package co-design and modeling.
Utilizing wide bandgap capabilities in applications such as data center power supplies, naval electrical systems, EV charging, and renewable integration necessitates a comprehensive analysis covering device physics, packaging, thermal management, and system architectures. Wide bandgap devices are highly valuable when used in high-performance power electronics equipment because of their superior attributes such as faster switching, lower losses, and high-temperature capacity. However, their effective deployment in these devices requires a thorough understanding of degradation mechanisms, customized design strategies, and extensive qualification testing [16]. However, to do this, you need a multidisciplinary team with knowledge in materials science, accelerated testing, circuit design, application engineering, and device fabrication. Wide bandgap potential can be unlocked by holistic solutions, which also guarantee enough robustness to enable a seamless technology transfer.
Since the 1950s, Si has been the primary semiconductor substrate used in the production of power electronics equipment. On the other hand, the maximum theoretical efficiency of Si-based power-switching devices has been achieved [236]. High power losses, low switching frequencies, and decreased performance at high temperatures are some of the disadvantages of Si-based devices. As the need for distributed energy resource (DER) integration and urban electrification grows, a new class of advanced materials called wide bandgap (WBG) semiconductors has emerged. Among them are SiC, diamond, GaN, aluminum nitride (AlN), boron nitride (BN), zinc oxide (ZnO), and gallium oxide (Ga2O3). These materials have a great deal of potential for the upcoming power conversion technologies. Unipolar devices, such as MOSFETs, have limited rated voltage and current capabilities, but they can achieve high switching frequencies.
Bipolar Si semiconductors, on the other hand, enable the operation of high-power conversion devices at relatively low frequencies, but this requires larger and heavier passive components, which might not be appropriate for applications like power supplies, motor drives, automotive, and aerospace that have strict weight and volume limitations. Figure 22 illustrates how WBG materials show a compelling alternative to the limitations of Si by offering enhanced properties. These materials have higher electric breakdown fields, deeper doping concentrations, and thinner layers. These properties enhance their ability to block voltage and decrease drift resistance, which, in turn, reduces conduction losses. This implies that smaller WBG devices with the same on-resistance can have lower capacitance. A high saturation drift velocity allows for higher switching speeds with reduced capacitance because less energy is lost during each switching cycle [53]. Additionally, strong high-temperature performance and a reduction in leakage currents are guaranteed by the low intrinsic carrier concentration of WBG materials [237].
All the characteristics of WBG materials make them prominent semiconductor devices in high-output power equipment with increased efficiency, as well as smaller, lighter, and less expensive systems [238]. With small switching losses, WBG semiconductors can achieve 99% efficiency. When compared to Si devices, this indicates a reduction in energy losses of up to 75% [128]. Furthermore, it is possible to obtain higher switching frequencies. Due to Si limitations, frequencies higher than 20 kHz have not yet been achievable at power levels greater than tens of kilowatts; as a result, WBG materials provide better output quality and enable simpler circuit topologies by reducing the size and number of passive components [239].

6.9. Current Marketplace Scenario

A transformational phase is now taking place in the market environment for power electronic semiconductors, which includes Si, SiC, and GaN. Si has long dominated the industry because it is inexpensive and has reliable production methods, but SiC and GaN are emerging as disruptive technologies that are steadily capturing market share. SiC-based devices are appropriate for high-power applications like electric cars and renewable energy systems because they have higher power densities, faster switching rates, and reduced losses. On the other hand, GaN-based devices offer high-frequency operation and increased efficiency, finding use in data centers and small power converters. Si-based devices continue to rule the industry due to their maturity and widespread availability despite SiC and GaN’s increasing acceptance. In the current market environment, SiC and GaN devices are gaining ground in high-power and high-frequency applications. In contrast, Si devices continue to predominate in low- to medium-power applications.
Power electronics are being used more often in various energy conversion end applications, propelling the considerable expansion of the worldwide power electronics market. The rising need for energy-efficient technology across a variety of end-user sectors is what drives this development. On 13 April 2023, in New York, GlobeNewswire shares [240] that, the market for power electronics will increase from USD 43.3 billion in 2022 to more than USD 94.21 billion by 2032, with a predicted compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.3% from 2023 to 2032, which is shown in Figure 23.
Power semiconductor devices comprising Si, SiC, GaN, and diamond are all compared in Table 24 for their features and uses. Voltage, current, frequency, applications, packaging, features, and manufacturers are given as important parameters for each type of device and material system. The chart displays the wide bandgap materials like SiC, GaN, and diamond for power electronics’ high voltage and high-frequency capabilities.
Several commercially available power semiconductor devices from top producers like Infineon and STMicroelectronics are shown in Table 25. The table covers key characteristics of various Si, SiC, and GaN devices. These devices can be used for low, medium, and high voltage applications due to their wide voltage ratings of 20 V to 2 kV. The range of current ratings is 4.5 A to 400 A. For high-frequency GaN HEMTs, switching frequencies up to 2 MHz are mentioned. The wide bandgap SiC and GaN enable an operational temperature range of up to 200 °C. Standard packaging formats for discrete devices, such as TO-247 and TO-263, are displayed. For developing GaN technology, chip-scale packages are also listed. The chart shows how contemporary power semiconductors combine high voltage blocking capabilities, low loss switching, and high-temperature tolerance to allow performance advantages in various power electronics applications. For various applications, top manufacturers offer a wide range of Si, SiC, and GaN devices.

7. Conclusions

Substantial advancements have been achieved in developing novel materials like SiC, GaN, and diamond, their commercialization, and the adoption of these wide and ultrawide bandgap power electronic semiconductors. Improvements in material quality, manufacturing processes, and device performance have boosted industrial use in many application fields. The capabilities and applications of these wide bandgap technologies are continuously being expanded by ongoing research and development. Wide bandgap power semiconductors, such as SiC, GaN, and ultrawide bandgap devices like diamond technology, have the potential to revolutionize power electronics due to their superiority over Si in terms of voltage blocking, switching speeds, efficiency, and thermal performance. SiC and GaN devices are progressively increasing in market share, particularly in electric vehicles, renewable energy, aerospace, and high-frequency applications, even if Si continues to rule the market now. Diamond’s exceptionally wide bandgap could enable unprecedented power densities and high-temperature operation if manufacturing challenges can be overcome. Finally, these wide and ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors have the potential to eventually replace Si throughout the entire spectrum of power electronics due to their advantages over Si, influencing the development of next-generation, high-performance, energy-efficient devices. This article summarized the physical characteristics, difficulties, uses, and competitive environment of several prospective wide bandgap power electronic semiconductors, including the recently developed diamond technology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.S.H.R. and O.A.M.; methodology, S.M.S.H.R.; software, M.A.H. (Md. Asadul Haque) and M.A.H. (Md. Asikul Haque); validation, S.M.S.H.R. and O.A.M.; formal analysis, R.A. and M.K.H.; investigation, S.M.S.H.R., R.A., M.A.H. (Md. Asadul Haque), M.K.H., and M.A.H. (Md. Asikul Haque); resources, S.M.S.H.R., R.A., M.A.H. (Md. Asadul Haque), M.K.H., and M.A.H. (Md. Asikul Haque); data curation, S.M.S.H.R., R.A., M.A.H. (Md. Asadul Haque), M.K.H., and M.A.H. (Md. Asikul Haque); writing—original draft preparation, S.M.S.H.R., R.A., M.A.H. (Md. Asadul Haque), M.K.H., and M.A.H. (Md. Asikul Haque); writing—review and editing, S.M.S.H.R., R.A., M.A.H. (Md. Asikul Haque), and O.A.M.; supervision, O.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Ahmed, R.; Mohammed, O.A. Wide Band Gap Semiconductor Devices for Power Electronic Converters. In Proceedings of the 2023 Fourth International Symposium on 3D Power Electronics Integration and Manufacturing (3D-PEIM), Miami, FL, USA, 1–3 February 2023; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Palmour, J.W. SiC power device development for industrial markets. In Proceeding of the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2014, San Francisco, CA, USA, 15–17 December 2014; pp. 1.1.1–1.1.8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chow, T.P. Progress in high voltage SiC and GaN power switching devices. Mater. Sci. Forum 2014, 778-780, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Islam, R.; Mohammed, O.A. Power Electronic Converters for Wind Power Generation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Fourth International Symposium on 3D Power Electronics Integration and Manufacturing (3D-PEIM), Miami, FL, USA, 1–3 February 2023; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Haque, M.A.; Islam, R.; Mohammed, O.A. A Review of Power Electronic Converters for Electric Aircrafts. In Proceedings of the 2023 Fourth International Symposium on 3D Power Electronics Integration and Manufacturing (3D-PEIM), Miami, FL, USA, 1–3 February 2023; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zerarka, M.; Austin, P.; Toulon, G.; Morancho, F.; Arbess, H.; Tasselli, J. Behavioral study of single-event burnout in power devices for natural radiation environment applications. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59, 3482–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, C.-H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Sun, L.-L.J.I.T.o.E.D. Research of single-event burnout in floating field ring termination of power MOSFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2017, 64, 2906–2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carr, J.A.; Hotz, D.; Balda, J.C.; Mantooth, H.A.; Ong, A.; Agarwal, A. Assessing the impact of SiC MOSFETs on converter interfaces for distributed energy resources. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2009, 24, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alam, M.; Kumar, K.; Dutta, V. Comparative efficiency analysis for Si, SiC MOSFETs and IGBT device for DC–DC boost converter. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Biela, J.; Schweizer, M.; Waffler, S.; Kolar, J.W. SiC versus Si—Evaluation of potentials for performance improvement of inverter and DC–DC converter systems by SiC power semiconductors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2010, 58, 2872–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chow, T.P. SiC and GaN high-voltage power switching devices. Mater. Sci. Forum 2000, 338–342, 1155–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, Y.-B.; Bhat, K.P.; Aravamudhan, A.; Hopkins, D.C.; Hazelmyer, D.R. High current and thermal transient design of a SiC SSPC for aircraft application. In Proceedings of the 2011 Twenty-Sixth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Fort Worth, TX, USA, 6–11 March 2011; pp. 1290–1297. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nakamura, T.; Sasagawa, M.; Nakano, Y.; Otsuka, T.; Miura, M. Large current SiC power devices for automobile applications. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Power Electronics Conference-ECCE ASIA-, Sapporo, Japan, 21–24 June 2010; pp. 1023–1026. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ranjbar, A. Applications of Wide Bandgap (WBG) Devices in the Transportation Sector. Recent Advances in (WBG) Semiconductor Material (e.g. SiC and GaN) and Circuit Topologies. In Transportation Electrification: Breakthroughs in Electrified Vehicles, Aircraft, Rolling Stock, and Watercraft; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 47–72. [Google Scholar]
  15. Roccaforte, F.; Fiorenza, P.; Greco, G.; Nigro, R.L.; Giannazzo, F.; Iucolano, F.; Saggio, M.J. Emerging trends in wide band gap semiconductors (SiC and GaN) technology for power devices. Microelectron. Eng. 2018, 187, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, K.J.; Häberlen, O.; Lidow, A.; lin Tsai, C.; Ueda, T.; Uemoto, Y.; Wu, Y. GaN-on-Si power technology: Devices and applications. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 779–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tsao, J.; Chowdhury, S.; Hollis, M.; Jena, D.; Johnson, N.; Jones, K.; Kaplar, R.; Rajan, S.; Van de Walle, C.; Bellotti, E. Ultrawide-bandgap semiconductors: Research opportunities and challenges. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 4, 1600501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Al Mamun, M.; Paudyal, S.; Kamalasadan, S. Efficient Dynamic Simulation of Unbalanced Distribution Grids with Distributed Generators. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN, USA, 29 October–2 November 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  19. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Available online: https://www.nist.gov/pml/owm/metric-si/understanding-metric (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  20. Zulehner, W. Historical overview of Si crystal pulling development. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2000, 73, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zaidi, B. Introductory chapter: Introduction to photovoltaic effect. Sol. Panels Photovolt. Mater. 2018, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zaidi, B.; Hadjoudja, B.; Felfli, H.; Chouial, B.; Chibani, A. Effet des traitements thermiques sur le comportement électrique des couches de silicium polycristallin pour des applications photovoltaïques. Rev. De Métallurgie 2011, 108, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Goetzberger, A.; Knobloch, J.; Voss, B. Crystalline Si Solar Cells; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zaidi, B.; Hadjoudja, B.; Felfli, H.; Chibani, A. Influence of doping and heat treatments on carriers mobility in polycrystalline Si thin films for photovoltaic application. Turk. J. Phys. 2011, 35, 185–188. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mathieu, H.; Bretagnon, T.; Lefebvre, P. Physique des Semiconducteurs et des Composants Electroniques-Problèmes Résolus; Dunod: Malakoff, France, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zaidi, B.; Saouane, I.; Shekhar, C. Electrical energy generated by amorphous Si solar panels. Si 2018, 10, 975–979. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zaidi, B.; Saouane, I.; Shekhar, C. Simulation of single-diode equivalent model of polycrystalline Si solar cells. Int. J. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Conibeer, G. Third-generation photovoltaics. Mater. Today 2007, 10, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zaidi, B.; Belghit, S.; Shekhar, C.; Mekhalfa, M.; Hadjoudja, B.; Chouial, B. Electrical performance of CuInSe2 solar panels using ant colony optimization algorithm. J. Nano-Electron. Phys. 2018, 10, 05045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sigfússon, T.I.; Helgason, Ö. Rates of transformations in the ferroSi system. Hyperfine Interact. 1990, 54, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Waanders, F.; Mans, A. Characterisation of ferroSi dense medium separation material. Hyperfine Interact. 2003, 148, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Borysiuk, J.; Sołtys, J.; Bożek, R.; Piechota, J.; Krukowski, S.; Strupiński, W.; Baranowski, J.M.; Stępniewski, R. Role of structure of C-terminated 4 H-SiC (000 1) surface in growth of graphene layers: Transmission electron microscopy and density functional theory studies. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 045426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alsema, E.A.; de Wild-Scholten, M.J. Environmental impacts of crystalline Si photovoltaic module production. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2006, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Baliga, B.J. Power Semiconductor Devices. Brooks/Cole. 1995. Available online: https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=31307574601 (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  35. Ultra- and Hyper-Fast Si Diodes: 650V Rapid 1 and Rapid 2. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/power/diodes-thyristors/Si-diodes/650v-rapid-1-and-rapid-2/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  36. Infenion. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/power/diodes-thyristors/Si-diodes/600v-1200v-ultra-soft/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  37. Moller, H. Semiconductors for Solar Cells; Artech House Inc.: Norwood, MA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  38. Edgar, L.J. Method and Apparatus for Controlling Electric Currents. US Patent 1,745,175, 21 January 1930. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kahng, D. Si-Si dioxide field field induced surface devices. In Proceedings of the IRE-AIEE Solid-State Device Research Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1960; Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Silicon%E2%80%93Silicon%20Dioxide%20Field%20Induced%20Surface%20Devices&author=D.K.%20State&publication_year=1960 (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  40. Moore, G.E. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. IEEE 1998, 86, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sze, S.M.; Ng, K.K. Physics of Semiconductor Devices; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  42. Prado, E.O.; Bolsi, P.C.; Sartori, H.C.; Pinheiro, J.R. An overview about Si, Superjunction, SiC and GaN power MOSFET technologies in power electronics applications. Energies 2022, 15, 5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Deboy, G.; Marz, N.; Stengl, J.-P.; Strack, H.; Tihanyi, J.; Weber, H. A new generation of high voltage MOSFETs breaks the limit line of Si. In Proceedings of the International Electron Devices Meeting 1998. Technical Digest (Cat. No. 98CH36217), San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–9 December 1998; pp. 683–685. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fujihira, T.; Miyasaka, Y. Simulated superior performances of semiconductor superjunction devices. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs. ISPSD’98 (IEEE Cat. No. 98CH36212), Kyoto, Japan, 3–6 June 1998; pp. 423–426. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen, X.B. Breakthrough to the" Si limit" of power devices. In Proceedings of the 1998 5th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, Beijing, China, 23 October 1998; pp. 141–144. [Google Scholar]
  46. Appels, J.; Vaes, H. High voltage thin layer devices (RESURF devices). In Proceedings of the 1979 International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 3–5 December 1979; pp. 238–241. [Google Scholar]
  47. Udrea, F.; Deboy, G.; Fujihira, T. Superjunction Power Devices, History, Development, and Future Prospects. IEEE Trans. Electron Device 2017, 64, 713–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Baliga, B.J. Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs): Theory and Design; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  49. VolLaska, T. Progress in Si IGBT Technology – as an ongoing Competition with WBG Power Devices. In Proceeding of the 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 7–11 December 2019; pp. 12.2.1–12.2.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vobecký, J. Design and technology of high-power Si devices. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems—MIXDES 2011, Gliwice, Poland, 16–19 June 2011; pp. 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  51. Guo, X.; Xun, Q.; Li, Z.; Du, S. SiC converters and MEMS devices for high-temperature power electronics: A critical review. Micromachines 2019, 10, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tian, Y.; Zetterling, C.-M. A fully integrated Si-carbide Sigma–Delta modulator operating up to 500 °C. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 2782–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Garrido-Diez, D.; Baraia, I. Review of wide bandgap materials and their impact in new power devices. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Workshop of Electronics, Control, Measurement, Signals and Their Application to Mechatronics (ECMSM), Donostia, Spain, 24–26 May 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, K. Wide Bandgap (SiC/GaN) Power Devices Characterization and Modeling: Application to HF Power Converters. Ph.D. Thesis, École Doctorale Sciences pour L’ingénieur (Lille), Lille, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  55. Chen, C.; Luo, F.; Kang, Y. A review of SiC power module packaging: Layout, material system and integration. CPSS Trans. Power Electron. Appl. 2017, 2, 170–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chabi, S.; Kadel, K. Two-dimensional SiC: Emerging direct band gap semiconductor. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Susi, T.; Skákalová, V.; Mittelberger, A.; Kotrusz, P.; Hulman, M.; Pennycook, T.J.; Mangler, C.; Kotakoski, J.; Meyer, J.C. Computational insights and the observation of SiC nanograin assembly: Towards 2D SiC. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ferdous, N.; Islam, M.S.; Park, J.; Hashimoto, A. Tunable electronic properties in stanene and two dimensional Si-carbide heterobilayer: A first principles investigation. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 025120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chowdhury, C.; Karmakar, S.; Datta, A. Monolayer group IV–VI monochalcogenides: Low-dimensional materials for photocatalytic water splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 7615–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Berzelius, J.J. Untersuchungen über die Flussspathsäure und deren merkwürdigsten Verbindungen. Ann. Der Phys. 1824, 77, 169–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pensl, G.; Ciobanu, F.; Frank, T.; Krieger, M.; Reshanov, S.; Schmid, F.; Weidner, M. Sic material properties. In Sic Materials And Devices; World Scientific: Singapore, 2006; Volume 1, pp. 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  62. Acheson, E.G. Carborundum: Its history, manufacture and uses. J. Frankl. Inst. 1893, 136, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kaminskiy, F.; Bukin, V.; Potapov, S.; Arkus, N.; Ivanova, V. Discoveries of SiC under natural conditions and their genetic importance. Int. Geol. Rev. 1969, 11, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Choyke, W.J.; Patrick, L.; Ziegler, J. (Eds.) SiC 2: Materials, Processing, and Devices; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kimoto, T.; Cooper, J.A. Fundamentals of SiC Technology: Growth, Characterization, Devices and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, Y.; Suzuki, T. Epitaxial Growth of SiC—Review on Growth Mechanism and Technology. J. Cryst. Growth 2019, 512, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  67. Singh, R.; Capell, D.C.; Hefner, A.R.; Lai, J.; Palmour, J.W. High-power 4H-SiC JBS rectifiers. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2002, 49, 2054–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, X.; Wang, G.; Lee, M.-C.; Huang, A.Q. Reliability of 4H-SiC SBD/JBS diodes under repetitive surge current stress. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Raleigh, NC, USA, 15–20 September 2012; pp. 2245–2248. [Google Scholar]
  69. Cheung, K.P. SiC power MOSFET gate oxide breakdown reliability—Current status. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), Burlingame, CA, USA, 11–15 March 2018; pp. 2B. 3-1–2B. 3-5. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wang, J.; Jiang, X. Review and analysis of SiC MOSFETs’ ruggedness and reliability. IET Power Electron. 2020, 13, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. She, X.; Huang, A.Q.; Lucia, O.; Ozpineci, B. Review of SiC power devices and their applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2017, 64, 8193–8205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Guo, S.; Zhang, L.; Lei, Y.; Li, X.; Xue, F.; Yu, W.; Huang, A.Q. 3.38 Mhz operation of 1.2 kV SiC MOSFET with integrated ultra-fast gate drive. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 3rd Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications (WiPDA), Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2–4 November 2015; pp. 390–395. [Google Scholar]
  73. Pérez-Tomás, A.; Brosselard, P.; Hassan, J.; Jorda, X.; Godignon, P.; Placidi, M.; Constant, A.; Millán, J.; Bergman, J. Schottky versus bipolar 3.3 kV SiC diodes. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2008, 23, 125004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Langpoklakpam, C.; Liu, A.-C.; Chu, K.-H.; Hsu, L.-H.; Lee, W.-C.; Chen, S.-C.; Sun, C.-W.; Shih, M.-H.; Lee, K.-Y.; Kuo, H.-C. Review of SiC processing for power MOSFET. Crystals 2022, 12, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Losee, P.; Bolotnikov, A.; Yu, L.; Beaupre, R.; Stum, Z.; Kennerly, S.; Dunne, G.; Sui, Y.; Kretchmer, J.; Johnson, A. 1.2 kV class SiC MOSFETs with improved performance over wide operating temperature. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC’s (ISPSD), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 15–149 June 2014; pp. 297–300. [Google Scholar]
  76. DiMarino, C.M.; Burgos, R.; Dushan, B. High-temperature SiC: Characterization of state-of-the-art SiC power transistors. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2015, 9, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Qingwen, S.; Xiaoyan, T.; Yimeng, Z.; Yuming, Z.; Yimen, Z. Investigation of SiC trench MOSFET with floating islands. IET Power Electron. 2016, 9, 2492–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jiang, H.; Wei, J.; Dai, X.; Ke, M.; Deviny, I.; Mawby, P. SiC trench MOSFET with shielded fin-shaped gate to reduce oxide field and switching loss. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2016, 37, 1324–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hiyoshi, T.; Uchida, K.; Sakai, M.; Furumai, M.; Tsuno, T.; Mikamura, Y. Gate oxide reliability of 4H-SiC V-groove trench MOSFET under various stress conditions. In Proceedings of the 2016 28th international Symposium on Power Semiconductor devices and ics (iSPSd), Prague, Czech Republic, 12–16 June 2016; pp. 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  80. Song, Q.; Yang, S.; Tang, G.; Han, C.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. 4H-SiC trench MOSFET with L-shaped gate. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2016, 37, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, Y.; Tian, K.; Hao, Y.; Yu, C.-H.; Liu, Y.-J. An optimized structure of 4H-SiC U-shaped trench gate MOSFET. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2015, 62, 2774–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Takaya, H.; Morimoto, J.; Hamada, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Sakakibara, J.; Watanabe, Y.; Soejima, N. A 4H-SiC trench MOSFET with thick bottom oxide for improving characteristics. In Proceedings of the 2013 25th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC’s (ISPSD), Kanazawa, Japan, 26–30 May 2013; pp. 43–46. [Google Scholar]
  83. Nakajima, A.; Saito, W.; Nishizawa, S.-i.; Ohashi, H. Theoretical Loss Analysis of Power Converters with 1200 V Class Si-IGBT and SiC-MOSFET. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of Pcim europe 2015; International Exhibition and Conference for Power Electronics, Intelligent Motion, Renewable Energy and Energy Management, Nuremberg, Germany, 19–20 May 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  84. Arrow. Available online: https://www.arrow.com/en/research-and-events/articles/advantages-of-sic-mosfet-vs-si-igbt (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  85. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Mohammed, O.A. Novel Dual Inverter Sub-Harmonic Synchronous Machines. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2023, 59, 8202605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Ali, Q.; Mohammed, O.A. Hybrid Sub-Harmonic Synchronous Machines Using Series and Parallel Consequent Permanent Magnet. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Nashville, TN, USA, 29 October – 2 November 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  87. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Ali, Q.; Mohammed, O.A. Novel PM-Assisted Model of the Two-Layer Sub-Harmonic Synchronous Machines. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES), Monterey/Seaside, CA, USA, 26–30 March 2023; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  88. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Mohammed, O.A. Sub-Harmonic Synchronous Machine Using a Dual Inverter and a Unique Three-Layer Stator Winding. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Magnetic Conference-Short Papers (INTERMAG Short Papers), Sendai, Japan, 15–19 May 2023; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  89. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Ali, Q.; Lipo, T.A. A novel sub-harmonic synchronous machine using three-layer winding topology. World Electr. Veh. J. 2022, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Ali, Q.; Khan, S.; Lipo, T.A. A novel two-layer winding topology for sub-harmonic synchronous machines. Electr. Eng. 2022, 104, 3027–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kadavelugu, A.; Mainali, K.; Patel, D.; Madhusoodhanan, S.; Tripathi, A.; Hatua, K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Ryu, S.-H.; Grider, D.; Leslie, S. Medium voltage power converter design and demonstration using 15 kV SiC N-IGBTs. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Charlotte, NC, USA, 15–19 March 2015; pp. 1396–1403. [Google Scholar]
  92. Rahimo, M.; Kopta, A.; Eicher, S.; Kaminski, N.; Bauer, F.; Schlapbach, U.; Linder, S. Extending the boundary limits of high voltage IGBTs and diodes to above 8 kV. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and Ics, Sante Fe, NM, USA, 7 June 2002; pp. 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  93. Wang, G.; Huang, A.Q.; Wang, F.; Song, X.; Ni, X.; Ryu, S.-H.; Grider, D.; Schupbach, M.; Palmour, J. Static and dynamic performance characterization and comparison of 15 kV SiC MOSFET and 15 kV SiC n-IGBTs. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC’s (ISPSD), Hong Kong, China, 10–14 May 2015; pp. 229–232. [Google Scholar]
  94. Abdalgader, I.A.; Kivrak, S.; Özer, T. Power performance comparison of SiC-IGBT and Si-IGBT switches in a three-phase inverter for aircraft applications. Micromachines 2022, 13, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ramungul, N.; Chow, T.; Ghezzo, M.; Kretchmer, J.; Hennessy, W. A fully planarized, 6H-SiC UMOS insulated-gate bipolar transistor. In Proceedings of the 1996 54th Annual Device Research Conference Digest, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 26 June 1996; pp. 56–57. [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang, Q.; Jonas, C.; Callanan, R.; Sumakeris, J.; Das, M.; Agarwal, A.; Palmour, J.; Ryu, S.-H.; Wang, J.; Huang, A. New Improvement Results on 7.5 kV 4H-SiC p-IGBTs with R diff, on of 26 mΩ·cm 2 at 25 °C. In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and IC’s, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 27–31 May 2007; pp. 281–284. [Google Scholar]
  97. Avram, M.; Brezeanu, G.; Avram, A.; Neagoe, O.; Brezeanu, M.; Iliescu, C.; Codreanu, C.; Voitincu, C. Contributions to development of high power SiC-IGBT. In Proceedings of the CAS 2005 Proceedings. 2005 International Semiconductor Conference, Sinaia, Romania, 3–5 October 2005; pp. 365–368. [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang, X.; Cooper, J.A. High-voltage n-channel IGBTs on free-standing 4H-SiC epilayers. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2010, 57, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Van Brunt, E.; Cheng, L.; O’Loughlin, M.J.; Richmond, J.; Pala, V.; Palmour, J.W.; Tipton, C.W.; Scozzie, C. 27 kV, 20 A 4H-SiC n-IGBTs. Mater. Sci. Forum 2015, 821–823, 847–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Madhusoodhanan, S.; Hatua, K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Leslie, S.; Ryu, S.-H.; Das, M.; Agarwal, A.; Grider, D. Comparison study of 12kV n-type SiC IGBT with 10kV SiC MOSFET and 6.5 kV Si IGBT based on 3L-NPC VSC applications. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Raleigh, NC, USA, 15–20 September 2012; pp. 310–317. [Google Scholar]
  101. Kadavelugu, A.; Bhattacharya, S.; Ryu, S.-H.; Van Brunt, E.; Grider, D.; Agarwal, A.; Leslie, S. Characterization of 15 kV SiC n-IGBT and its application considerations for high power converters. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Denver, CO, USA, 15–19 September 2013; pp. 2528–2535. [Google Scholar]
  102. Tripathi, A.; Mainali, K.; Madhusoodhanan, S.; Patel, D.; Kadavelugu, A.; Hazra, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Hatua, K. MVDC microgrids enabled by 15kV SiC IGBT based flexible three phase dual active bridge isolated DC-DC converter. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Montreal, QC, Canada, 20–24 September 2015; pp. 5708–5715. [Google Scholar]
  103. Han, L.; Liang, L.; Kang, Y.; Qiu, Y. A Review of SiC IGBT: Models, Fabrications, Characteristics, and Applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 36, 2080–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ciuti, G.; Ricotti, L.; Menciassi, A.; Dario, P. MEMS sensor technologies for human centred applications in healthcare, physical activities, safety and environmental sensing: A review on research activities in Italy. Sensors 2015, 15, 6441–6468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Funaki, T.; Balda, J.C.; Junghans, J.; Kashyap, A.S.; Mantooth, H.A.; Barlow, F.; Kimoto, T.; Hikihara, T. Power conversion with SiC devices at extremely high ambient temperatures. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2007, 22, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Katoh, Y.; Snead, L.L. SiC and its composites for nuclear applications–Historical overview. J. Nucl. Mater. 2019, 526, 151849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ning, P.; Wang, F.; Ngo, K.D. High-temperature SiC power module electrical evaluation procedure. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2011, 26, 3079–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, R.; Boroyevich, D.; Ning, P.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Mattavelli, P.; Ngo, K.D.; Rajashekara, K. A high-temperature sic three-phase ac-dc converter design for> 100/spl deg/c ambient temperature. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2012, 28, 555–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Carbosystem. Available online: https://carbosystem.com/en/Si-carbide-properties-applications (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  110. Zabihi, N.; Mumtaz, A.; Logan, T.; Daranagama, T.; McMahon, R.A. SiC power devices for applications in hybrid and electric vehicles. Mater. Sci. Forum 2019, 963, 869–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Durham, N. Cree Launches Industry’s First Commercial SiC Power Mosfet. 2011. Available online: https://compoundsemiconductor.net/article/87227/Cree_Launches_Industry%E2%80%99s_First_Commercial_SiC_Power_MOSFET (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  112. STMicroelectronics: STPOWER SiC MOSFETs. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/power-transistors/stpower-sic-mosfets.html (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  113. Cai, W.; Wu, X.; Zhou, M.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Y. Review and development of electric motor systems and electric powertrains for new energy vehicles. Automot. Innov. 2021, 4, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Greencarcongress. Available online: https://www.greencarcongress.com/2023/04/20230404-denso.html (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  115. Hamdan, M. Keynote: The Development and Use of SiC Power Devices in Aerospace Applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Design Methodologies Conference 2023, Miami, FL, USA, 24-26 September 2023. [Google Scholar]
  116. 200kW Integrated Starter Generator Controller. Available online: https://www.geaerospace.com/sites/default/files/2022-03/200kW-Integrated-Starter-Generator-Controller%20%281%29.pdf (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  117. SiC Power Modules. Available online: https://www.geaerospace.com/sites/default/files/Si-Carbide-Power-Modules-2020.12.pdf (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  118. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Lipo, T.A.; Kwon, B.-I. Performance analysis of the three transistor voltage source inverter using different PWM techniques. In Proceedings of the 2015 9th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE-ECCE Asia), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1–5 June 2015; pp. 1428–1443. [Google Scholar]
  119. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Lipo, T.A. A novel cascaded two transistor H-bridge multilevel voltage source converter topology. In Proceedings of the 2015 Intl Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines & Power Electronics (ACEMP), 2015 Intl Conference on Optimization of Electrical & Electronic Equipment (OPTIM) & 2015 Intl Symposium on Advanced Electromechanical Motion Systems (ELECTROMOTION), Side, Turkey, 2–4 September 2015; pp. 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  120. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Lipo, T.A.; Kwon, B.-i. Novel matrix converter topologies with reduced transistor count. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 14-18 September 2014; pp. 1078–1085. [Google Scholar]
  121. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Lipo, T.A.; Kwon, B.-i. A novel topology for a voltage source inverter with reduced transistor count and utilizing naturally commutated thyristors with simple commutation. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, Ischia, Italy, 18–20 June 2014; pp. 643–648. [Google Scholar]
  122. Ji, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, F. Overview of high voltage SiC power semiconductor devices: Development and application. CES Trans. Electr. Mach. Syst. 2017, 1, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lovati, S. SiC Technology: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Available online: https://www.powerelectronicsnews.com/sic-technology-challenges-and-future-perspectives/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  124. Ji, S.; Zheng, S.; Wang, F.; Tolbert, L.M. Temperature-dependent characterization, modeling, and switching speed-limitation analysis of third-generation 10-kV SiC MOSFET. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 33, 4317–4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Passmore, B.; Cole, Z.; McGee, B.; Wells, M.; Stabach, J.; Bradshaw, J.; Shaw, R.; Martin, D.; McNutt, T.; VanBrunt, E. The next generation of high voltage (10 kV) SiC power modules. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 4th Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications (WiPDA), Fayetteville, AR, USA, 7–9 November 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  126. Jackson, D. Reliability through increased safety insulation systems: The effect of high-speed switching on the motor insulation system. Power Eng. J. 2000, 14, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Bolotnikov, A.; Losee, P.; Permuy, A.; Dunne, G.; Kennerly, S.; Rowden, B.; Nasadoski, J.; Harfman-Todorovic, M.; Raju, R.; Tao, F. Overview of 1.2 kV–2.2 kV SiC MOSFETs targeted for industrial power conversion applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Charlotte, NC, USA, 15–19 March 2015; pp. 2445–2452. [Google Scholar]
  128. Armstrong, K.O.; Das, S.; Cresko, J. Wide bandgap semiconductor opportunities in power electronics. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 4th Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications (WiPDA), Fayetteville, AR, USA, 7–9 November 2016; pp. 259–264. [Google Scholar]
  129. Sadik, D.-P.; Colmenares, J.; Tolstoy, G.; Peftitsis, D.; Bakowski, M.; Rabkowski, J.; Nee, H.-P. Short-circuit protection circuits for Si-carbide power transistors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 63, 1995–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Hu, J.; Alatise, O.; Gonzalez, J.A.O.; Bonyadi, R.; Alexakis, P.; Ran, L.; Mawby, P. Robustness and balancing of parallel-connected power devices: SiC versus CoolMOS. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 63, 2092–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Al Mamun, M.; Paudyal, S.; Kamalasadan, S. Dynamics of Photovoltaic System with Smart Inverter Functions using Phasor Domain Model. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN, USA, 29 October–2 November 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  132. Ning, P.; Liang, Z.; Wang, F. Double-sided cooling design for novel planar module. In Proceedings of the 2013 Twenty-Eighth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Long Beach, CA, USA, 17–21 March 2013; pp. 616–621. [Google Scholar]
  133. Laloya, E.; Lucia, O.; Sarnago, H.; Burdio, J.M. Heat management in power converters: From state of the art to future ultrahigh efficiency systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 31, 7896–7908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ning, P.; Zhang, D.; Lai, R.; Jiang, D.; Wang, F.; Boroyevich, D.; Burgos, R.; Karimi, K.; Immanuel, V.D.; Solodovnik, E.V. High-temperature hardware: Development of a 10-kW high-temperature, high-power-density three-phase ac-dc-ac SiC converter. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2013, 7, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. She, X.; Datta, R.; Todorovich, M.H.; Mandrusiak, G.; Dai, J.; Frangieh, T.; Cioffi, P.; Rowden, B.; Mueller, F. High performance SiC power block for industry applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Milwaukee, WI, USA, 18–22 September 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  136. Egawa, T. Development of next generation devices amidst global competition due to their huge market potential. Ultim. Vac. ULVAC 2012, 63, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  137. Takahashi, K.; Yoshikawa, A.; Sandhu, A. Wide Bandgap Semiconductors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  138. Navitassemi. Available online: https://navitassemi.com/gallium-nitride-the-next-generation-of-power/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  139. Kaminski, N.; Hilt, O. SiC and GaN devices–wide bandgap is not all the same. IET Circuits Devices Syst. 2014, 8, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mishra, U.K.; Shen, L.; Kazior, T.E.; Wu, Y.-F. GaN-based RF power devices and amplifiers. IEEE 2008, 96, 287–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Meneghesso, G.; Meneghini, M.; Zanoni, E. GaN-Enabled High Frequency and High Efficiency Power Conversion; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  142. Chou, P.-C.; Chen, S.-H.; Hsieh, T.-E.; Cheng, S.; Del Alamo, J.A.; Chang, E.Y. Evaluation and reliability assessment of GaN-on-Si MIS-HEMT for power switching applications. Energies 2017, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Flack, T.J.; Pushpakaran, B.N.; Bayne, S.B. GaN technology for power electronic applications: A review. J. Electron. Mater. 2016, 45, 2673–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Runton, D.W.; Trabert, B.; Shealy, J.B.; Vetury, R. History of GaN: High-power RF GaN from infancy to manufacturable process and beyond. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2013, 14, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Lidow, A. GaN as a displacement technology for Si in power management. In Proceedings of the 2011 ieee energy conversion congress and exposition, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 17–22 September 2011; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  146. Parikh, P.; Wu, Y.; Shen, L. Commercialization of high 600V GaN-on-Si power HEMTs and diodes. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Energytech, Cleveland, OH, USA, 21–23 May 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  147. Rohm. Available online: https://www.rohm.com/products/gan-power-devices (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  148. Meneghini, M.; De Santi, C.; Abid, I.; Buffolo, M.; Cioni, M.; Khadar, R.A.; Nela, L.; Zagni, N.; Chini, A.; Medjdoub, F. GaN-based power devices: Physics, reliability, and perspectives. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 130, 181101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Oka, T. Recent development of vertical GaN power devices. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 58, SB0805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Pu, T.; Younis, U.; Chiu, H.-C.; Xu, K.; Kuo, H.-C.; Liu, X. Review of recent progress on vertical GaN-based PN diodes. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Gu, H.; Tian, F.; Zhang, C.; Xu, K.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Deng, X.; Liu, X. Recovery performance of Ge-doped vertical GaN Schottky barrier diodes. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Liu, X.; Liu, Q.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Yu, W.; Xu, K.; Ao, J.-P. 1.2 kV GaN Schottky barrier diodes on free-standing GaN wafer using a CMOS-compatible contact material. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 56, 026501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zhan, A.; Dang, G.T.; Ren, F.; Cho, H.; Lee, K.-P.; Pearton, S.J.; Chyi, J.-I.; Nee, T.-Y.; Chuo, C.-C. Comparison of GaN pin and Schottky rectifier performance. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2001, 48, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhang, A.; Johnson, J.; Ren, F.; Han, J.; Polyakov, A.; Smirnov, N.; Govorkov, A.; Redwing, J.M.; Lee, K.; Pearton, S. Lateral Al x Ga 1− x N power rectifiers with 9.7 kV reverse breakdown voltage. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 823–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Millan, J.; Godignon, P.; Perpiñà, X.; Pérez-Tomás, A.; Rebollo, J. A survey of wide bandgap power semiconductor devices. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 29, 2155–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Placidi, M.; Pérez-Tomás, A.; Constant, A.; Rius, G.; Mestres, N.; Millán, J.; Godignon, P. Effects of cap layer on ohmic Ti/Al contacts to Si+ implanted GaN. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 6057–6060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Ohta, H.; Kaneda, N.; Horikiri, F.; Narita, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Mishima, T.; Nakamura, T. Vertical GaN pn junction diodes with high breakdown voltages over 4 kV. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2015, 36, 1180–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Hu, Z.; Nomoto, K.; Song, B.; Zhu, M.; Qi, M.; Pan, M.; Gao, X.; Protasenko, V.; Jena, D.; Xing, H.G. Near unity ideality factor and Shockley-Read-Hall lifetime in GaN-on-GaN pn diodes with avalanche breakdown. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 243501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Kizilyalli, I.C.; Edwards, A.P.; Aktas, O.; Prunty, T.; Bour, D. Vertical power pn diodes based on bulk GaN. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2014, 62, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Armstrong, A.; Allerman, A.; Fischer, A.; King, M.; Van Heukelom, M.; Moseley, M.; Kaplar, R.; Wierer, J.; Crawford, M.; Dickerson, J. High voltage and high current density vertical GaN power diodes. Electron. Lett. 2016, 52, 1170–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Flicker, J.; Kaplar, R. Design optimization of GaN vertical power diodes and comparison to Si and SiC. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 5th Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications (WiPDA), Albuquerque, NM, USA, 30 October–1 November 2017; pp. 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  162. Liu, A.-C.; Lai, Y.-Y.; Chen, H.-C.; Chiu, A.-P.; Kuo, H.-C. A Brief Overview of the Rapid Progress and Proposed Improvements in GaN Epitaxy and Process for Third-Generation Semiconductors with Wide Bandgap. Micromachines 2023, 14, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Dang, G.; Zhang, A.; Mshewa, M.; Ren, F.; Chyi, J.-I.; Lee, C.-M.; Chuo, C.; Chi, G.; Han, J.; Chu, S. High breakdown voltage Au/Pt/GaN Schottky diodes. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2000, 18, 1135–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Arslan, E.; Altındal, Ş.; Özçelik, S.; Ozbay, E. Dislocation-governed current-transport mechanism in (Ni/Au)–AlGaN/AlN/GaN heterostructures. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 105, 023705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Applications of Microchip. Available online: https://www.microchip.com/en-us/solutions (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  166. Nexgen Power Systems: GaN Semiconductor & Power Devices. Available online: https://nexgenpowersystems.com/technology/vertical-gan-semiconductor (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  167. Fu, H.; Fu, K.; Chowdhury, S.; Palacios, T.; Zhao, Y. Vertical GaN power devices: Device principles and fabrication technologies—Part II. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 3212–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Zheng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Song, W.; Chen, T.; Feng, S.; Ng, Y.H.; Sun, J.; Xu, H.; Yang, S.; Wei, J. Threshold voltage instability of enhancement-mode GaN buried p-channel MOSFETs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2021, 42, 1584–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ma, C.; GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistor. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/158 (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  170. Hari, N.; Long, T.; Shelton, E. Investigation of gate drive strategies for high voltage GaN HEMTs. Energy Procedia 2017, 117, 1152–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Zheng, T.Q.; Jia, P. Dynamic-State Analysis of Inverter Based on Cascode GaN HEMTs for PV Application. Energies 2022, 15, 7791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Roberts, J.; Scott, I.H. Power Switching Systems Comprising High Power E-Mode GaN Transistors and Driver Circuitry. US Patent 9,525,413, 20 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  173. Dong, M.; Elmes, J.; Peper, M.; Batarseh, I.; Shen, Z.J. Investigation on inherently safe gate drive techniques for normally-on wide bandgap power semiconductor switching devices. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, San Jose, CA, USA, 20–24 September 2009; pp. 120–125. [Google Scholar]
  174. Ishibashi, T.; Okamoto, M.; Hiraki, E.; Tanaka, T.; Hashizume, T.; Kachi, T. Resonant gate driver for normally-on GaN high-electron-mobility transistor. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE ECCE Asia Downunder, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 3–6 June 2013; pp. 365–371. [Google Scholar]
  175. Huang, X.; Li, Q.; Liu, Z.; Lee, F.C. Analytical loss model of high voltage GaN HEMT in cascode configuration. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 29, 2208–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. EPC. Available online: https://epc-co.com/epc/gallium-nitride/where-is-gan-going (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  177. Electronics-Notes. Available online: https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/electronic_components/fet-field-effect-transistor/gallium-nitride-gan-fet-hemt.php (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  178. Morita, T.; Yanagihara, M.; Ishida, H.; Hikita, M.; Kaibara, K.; Matsuo, H.; Uemoto, Y.; Ueda, T.; Tanaka, T.; Ueda, D. 650 V 3.1 mΩcm 2 GaN-based monolithic bidirectional switch using normally-off gate injection transistor. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 10–12 December 2007; pp. 865–868. [Google Scholar]
  179. Uemoto, Y.; Morita, T.; Ikoshi, A.; Umeda, H.; Matsuo, H.; Shimizu, J.; Hikita, M.; Yanagihara, M.; Ueda, T.; Tanaka, T. GaN monolithic inverter IC using normally-off gate injection transistors with planar isolation on Si substrate. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Baltimore, MD, USA, 7–9 December 2009; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  180. Ueda, T. GaN power devices: Current status and future challenges. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 58, SC0804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, M.; Piedra, D.; Chowdhury, N.; Palacios, T. Materials and processing issues in vertical GaN power electronics. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018, 78, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Mizutani, T.; Ohno, Y.; Akita, M.; Kishimoto, S.; Maezawa, K. A study on current collapse in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs induced by bias stress. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2003, 50, 2015–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Yu, C.-H.; Luo, X.-D.; Zhou, W.-Z.; Luo, Q.-Z.; Liu, P.-S. Investigation on the current collapse effect of AlGaN/GaN/InGaN/GaN double-heterojunction HEMTs. Acta Phys. Sin. 2012, 61, 207301. [Google Scholar]
  184. Meneghini, M.; Vanmeerbeek, P.; Silvestri, R.; Dalcanale, S.; Banerjee, A.; Bisi, D.; Zanoni, E.; Meneghesso, G.; Moens, P. Temperature-dependent dynamic RON in GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs: Role of surface traps and buffer leakage. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2015, 62, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Uren, M.J.; Moreke, J.; Kuball, M. Buffer design to minimize current collapse in GaN/AlGaN HFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59, 3327–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Blackwell, G.R. Circuit boards. In The Electronic Packaging Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  187. Islam, R.; Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Mohammed, O.A. Comprehensive Review of Power Electronic Converters in Electric Vehicle Applications. Forecasting 2022, 5, 22–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Islam, R.; Mohammed, O.A. Overview of Power Electronic Converters in Electric Vehicle Applications. In Proceedings of the 2023 Fourth International Symposium on 3D Power Electronics Integration and Manufacturing (3D-PEIM), Miami, FL, USA, 1–3 February 2023; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  189. Keshmiri, N.; Wang, D.; Agrawal, B.; Hou, R.; Emadi, A. Current status and future trends of GaN HEMTs in electrified transportation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 70553–70571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Amano, H.; Baines, Y.; Beam, E.; Borga, M.; Bouchet, T.; Chalker, P.R.; Charles, M.; Chen, K.J.; Chowdhury, N.; Chu, R. The 2018 GaN power electronics roadmap. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 163001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Power Electronics. Available online: https://www.powerelectronicsnews.com/ces-2022-gan-technology-for-the-next-future (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  192. Dusmez, S.; Fu, L.; Beheshti, M.; Brohlin, P.; Gao, R. Overcurrent Protection in High-Density GaN Power Designs. Available online: https://www.ti.com/lit/an/snoaa15/snoaa15.pdf (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  193. Guide, G.A. Design with Gan Enhancement Mode Hemt; GaN Systems Inc.: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2018; Volume 12. [Google Scholar]
  194. Lovati, S. GaN Technology: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Available online: https://www.powerelectronicsnews.com/sic-technology-challenges-and-future-perspectives/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  195. He, J. Comparison between The ultra-wide band gap semiconductor AlGaN and GaN. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 738, 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Millan, J. A review of WBG power semiconductor devices. In Proceedings of the CAS 2012 (International Semiconductor Conference), Sinaia, Romania, 15–17 October 2012; pp. 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  197. Lo Nigro, R.; Fiorenza, P.; Greco, G.; Schilirò, E.; Roccaforte, F. Structural and Insulating Behaviour of High-Permittivity Binary Oxide Thin Films for SiC and GaN Electronic Devices. Materials 2022, 15, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Devi, S.; Seyezhai, R. Comparative analysis of Si, SiC and GaN based quasi impedance source inverter. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 62, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Hassan, A.; Savaria, Y.; Sawan, M. GaN integration technology, an ideal candidate for high-temperature applications: A review. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 78790–78802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ozpineci, B.; Tolbert, L.M. Comparison of Wide-Bandgap Semiconductors for Power Electronics Applications; United States Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  201. Baliga, B.J. Fundamentals of Power Semiconductor Devices; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  202. Maier, D.; Alomari, M.; Grandjean, N.; Carlin, J.-F.; Diforte-Poisson, M.-A.; Dua, C.; Chuvilin, A.; Troadec, D.; Gaquière, C.; Kaiser, U. Testing the temperature limits of GaN-based HEMT devices. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 2010, 10, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Shenai, K.; Scott, R.S.; Baliga, B.J. Optimum semiconductors for high-power electronics. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1989, 36, 1811–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Singh, S.; Chaudhary, T.; Khanna, G. Recent advancements in wide band semiconductors (SiC and GaN) technology for future devices. Si 2022, 14, 5793–5800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Infineon: SiC MOSFET in Compact SMD Package-IMBG65R022M1H. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/power/mosfet/Si-carbide/discretes/imbg65r022m1h/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  206. Meneghini, M.; Meneghesso, G.; Zanoni, E. Power GaN Devices; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  207. Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, S.; Chen, C.; Wang, Z.; Yao, Y. Design and optimization on a novel high-performance ultra-thin barrier AlGaN/GaN power HEMT with local charge compensation trench. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Wang, Z.; Li, L. Two-dimensional polarization doping of GaN heterojunction and its potential for realizing lateral p–n junction devices. Appl. Phys. A 2022, 128, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Wang, Z.; Yang, D.; Cao, J.; Wang, F.; Yao, Y. A novel technology for turn-on voltage reduction of high-performance lateral heterojunction diode with source-gate shorted anode. Superlattices Microstruct. 2019, 125, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Kaess, F.; Mita, S.; Xie, J.; Reddy, P.; Klump, A.; Hernandez-Balderrama, L.H.; Washiyama, S.; Franke, A.; Kirste, R.; Hoffmann, A. Correlation between mobility collapse and carbon impurities in Si-doped GaN grown by low pressure metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 120, 105701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Kizilyalli, I.C.; Edwards, A.P.; Nie, H.; Disney, D.; Bour, D. High voltage vertical GaN pn diodes with avalanche capability. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 3067–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Pakes, C.I.; Garrido, J.A.; Kawarada, H. Diamond surface conductivity: Properties, devices, and sensors. Mrs Bull. 2014, 39, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Bose, B.K. Power Electronics in Renewable Energy Systems and Smart Grid: Technology and Applications; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  214. Adler, M.; Temple, V. Maximum surface and bulk electric fields at breakdown for planar and beveled devices. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 1978, 25, 1266–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Cornu, J. Field distribution near the surface of beveled pn junctions in high-voltage devices. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 1973, 20, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Przybilla, J.; Dorn, J.; Barthelmess, R.; Kellner-Werdehausen, U.; Schulze, H.-J.; Niedernostheide, F.-J. Diodes and thyristor—Past, presence and future. In Proceedings of the 2009 13th european conference on Power electronics and applications, Barcelona, Spain, 8–10 September 2009; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  217. Parameters of Semiconductor Compounds and Heterostructures. Available online: http://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  218. Takaku, T.; Igarashi, S.; Nishimura, T.; Onozawa, Y.; Miyashita, S.; Ikawa, O.; Fujishima, N.; Heinzel, T. 1700V Hybrid Module with Si-IGBT and SiC-SBD for High Efficiency AC690V Application. In Proceedings of the Pcim europe 2015; international exhibition and conference for Power electronics, intelligent motion, renewable energy and energy management, Nuremberg, Germany, 19–20 May 2015; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  219. Kaneko, S.; Kanai, N.; Hori, M.; Masayoshi, N.; Kakiki, H.; Abe, Y.; Ikeda, Y.; Mochizuki, E. Compact, low loss and high reliable 3.3 kV hybrid power module. In Proceedings of the Pcim Europe 2016; International Exhibition and Conference for Power Electronics, Intelligent Motion, Renewable Energy and Energy Management, 2016; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  220. Huang, A.Q. Power semiconductor devices for smart grid and renewable energy systems. In Power Electronics in Renewable Energy Systems and Smart Grid: Technology and Applications; The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 85–152. [Google Scholar]
  221. Shenai, K. The invention and demonstration of the IGBT [a look back]. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2015, 2, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Infenion. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/power/igbt/igbt-modules/igbt-modules-up-to-4500v-6500v/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  223. Rahimo, M.; Kopta, A.; Schlapbach, U.; Vobecky, J.; Schnell, R.; Klaka, S. The Bi-mode Insulated Gate Transistor (BiGT) A potential technology for higher power applications. In Proceedings of the 2009 21st International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC’s, Barcelona, Spain, 14–18 June 2009; pp. 283–286. [Google Scholar]
  224. Voss, S.; Niedernostheide, F.; Schulze, H. Anode design variation in 1200-V trench field-stop reverse-conducting IGBTs. In Proceedings of the 2008 20th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and IC’s, Orlando, FL, USA, 18–22 May 2008; pp. 169–172. [Google Scholar]
  225. Rahimo, M.; Schlapbach, U.; Kopta, A.; Vobecky, J.; Schneider, D.; Baschnagel, A. A high current 3300V module employing reverse conducting IGBTs setting a new benchmark in output power capability. In Proceedings of the 2008 20th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and IC’s, Orlando, FL, USA, 18–22 May 2008; pp. 68–71. [Google Scholar]
  226. Huang, Q.; Amaratunga, G. MOS Controlled Diodes—A new power diode. Solid-State Electron. 1995, 38, 977–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Xu, Z.; Zhang, B.; Huang, A.Q. An analysis and experimental approach to MOS controlled diodes behavior. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2000, 15, 916–922. [Google Scholar]
  228. Xu, Z.; Zhang, B.; Huang, A.Q. Experimental demonstration of the MOS controlled diode (MCD). In Proceedings of the APEC 2000. Fifteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (Cat. No. 00CH37058), New Orleans, LA, USA, 6–10 February 2000; pp. 1144–1148. [Google Scholar]
  229. Schweizer, M.; Kolar, J.W. Design and implementation of a highly efficient three-level T-type converter for low-voltage applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2012, 28, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Naito; Takei; Nemoto; Hayashi; Ueno. 1200V reverse blocking IGBT with low loss for matrix converter. In Proceedings of the 2004 Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Kitakyushu, Japan, 24–27 May 2004; pp. 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  231. Kopta, A. High voltage Si based devices for energy efficient power distribution and consumption. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 15–17 December 2014; pp. 2.4.1–2.4.4. [Google Scholar]
  232. Li, Y.; Huang, A.Q.; Lee, F.C. Introducing the emitter turn-off thyristor (ETO). In Proceedings of the Conference Record of 1998 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Third IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No. 98CH36242), St. Louis, MO, USA, 12–15 October 1998; pp. 860–864. [Google Scholar]
  233. Zhang, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Hawley, J.; Huang, A.Q. The high power and high frequency operation of the emitter turn-off (ETO) thyristor. In Proceedings of the IECON’03. 29th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37468), Roanoke, VA, USA, 2–6 November 2003; pp. 1167–1172. [Google Scholar]
  234. Zhang, B.; Huang, A.Q.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Atcitty, S. The built-in current sensor and over-current protection of the emitter turn-off (ETO) thyristor. In Proceedings of the 38th IAS Annual Meeting on Conference Record of the Industry Applications Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 12–16 October 2003; pp. 1264–1269. [Google Scholar]
  235. Wang, H.; Wei, J.; Xie, R.; Liu, C.; Tang, G.; Chen, K.J. Maximizing the performance of 650-V p-GaN gate HEMTs: Dynamic RON characterization and circuit design considerations. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 32, 5539–5549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Sharma, A.; Lee, S.J.; Jang, Y.J.; Jung, J.P. SiC based technology for high power electronics and packaging applications. J. Microelectron. Packag. Soc. 2014, 21, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Kizilyalli, I.C.; Carlson, E.P.; Cunningham, D.W.; Manser, J.S.; Xu, Y.A.; Liu, A.Y. Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Based Power Electronics for Energy Efficiency; US Department of Energy (USDOE): Washington DC, USA, 2018.
  238. Das, S.; Marlino, L.D.; Armstrong, K.O. Wide Bandgap Semiconductor Opportunities in Power Electronics; Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL): Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2018.
  239. Wang, F.F.; Zhang, Z. Overview of SiC technology: Device, converter, system, and application. CPSS Trans. Power Electron. Appl. 2016, 1, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Market-US. Available online: https://market.us/report/power-electronics-market/request-sample/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  241. Onsemi: 1200 V, 30 A Si Diode. Available online: https://www.onsemi.com/products/discrete-power-modules/power-modules/igbt-modules/nxh80b120l2q0 (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  242. SiC Diodes|FFSM1065A. Available online: https://www.onsemi.com/products/discrete-power-modules/Si-carbide-sic/Si-carbide-sic-diodes/ffsm1065a (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  243. Onsemi: SiC MOSFET-NVBG095N065SC1. Available online: https://www.onsemi.com/download/data-sheet/pdf/nvbg095n065sc1-d.pdf (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  244. Onsemi: SiC MOSFET-NTH4L028N170M1. Available online: https://www.onsemi.com/download/data-sheet/pdf/nth4l028n170m1-d.pdf (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  245. Infineon: GaN CoolGaN™ 600V Enhancement-Mode Power Transistor. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/power/gan-hemt-gallium-nitride-transistor/iglr60r340d1/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  246. Infineon: GaN CoolGaN™ 400V Enhancement-MODE Power Transistor. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/power/gan-hemt-gallium-nitride-transistor/igt40r070d1/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  247. Infineon: Fast Switching Diode. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/power/mosfet/n-channel/optimos-and-strongirfet-latest-family-selection-guide/optimos-fast-diode-200v-220-250v-300v/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  248. Infineon: Fast Switching Emitter Controlled Diode. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/IDB18E120_rev2_3G.pdf?fileId=5546d4614815da880148406b0af611e4 (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  249. Infineon: 2000 V, 60 A Boost EasyPACK™ 3B CoolSiC™ MOSFET Module-DF4-19MR20W3M1HF_B11. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/power/mosfet/Si-carbide/modules/df4-19mr20w3m1hf_b11/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  250. Infineon: HybridPACK™DriveModule-FS380R12A6T4B. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon-FS380R12A6T4B-DataSheet-v03_01-EN.pdf?fileId=5546d4626da6c043016db9e750e268b1 (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  251. Infineon: IGBT-Module-F4-50R07W1H3_B11A. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon-F4-50R07W1H3_B11A-DataSheet-v03_00-EN.pdf?fileId=db3a3043405f2978014071e0c83f2079 (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  252. ROHM-Gallium-Nitride HEMT-GNE1040TB. Available online: https://www.rohm.com/products/gan-power-devices/gan-hemt/gne1040tb-product#productDetail (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  253. ROHM: SiC MOSFET-SCT2H12NY. Available online: https://www.rohm.com/products/sic-power-devices/sic-mosfet/sct2h12ny-product (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  254. ROHM: SiC MOSFETs. Available online: https://www.rohm.com/products/sic-power-devices/sic-mosfet (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  255. ROHM: Power MOSFET-UT6MA3. Available online: https://www.rohm.com/products/mosfets/small-signal/dual/ut6ma3-product (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  256. ROHM: Power MOSFET-QH8M22. Available online: https://www.rohm.com/products/mosfets/small-signal/dual/qh8m22-product#productDetail (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  257. ROHM: Ignition IGBT. Available online: https://www.rohm.com/products/igbt/ignition-igbt?page=1&CollectorCurrent100_num=20.030.0#parametricSearch (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  258. ST Microelectronics: 600 V Schottky SiC Diode-STPSC2006CW. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/diodes-and-rectifiers/stpsc2006cw.html (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  259. ST Microelectronics: 1200 V, 40 A High Surge SiC Power Schottky Diode-STPSC40H12C. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/diodes-and-rectifiers/stpsc40h12c.html (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  260. ST Microelectronics: SiC Power MOSFET-SCT1000N170. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/power-transistors/sct1000n170.html (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  261. ST Microelectronics: GaN HEMTs-MASTERGAN1. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/power-management/mastergan1.html (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  262. ST Microelectronics: GaN HEMTs-MASTERGAN3. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/power-management/mastergan3.html (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  263. ST Microelectronics: STPOWER IGBTs Bare die up to 1700V. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/power-transistors/1700v.html (accessed on 29 September 2023).
Figure 1. Summary of Si’s, SiC’s, and GaN’s relevant material properties [1].
Figure 1. Summary of Si’s, SiC’s, and GaN’s relevant material properties [1].
Micromachines 14 02045 g001
Figure 2. Side view of SiC lattice [54].
Figure 2. Side view of SiC lattice [54].
Micromachines 14 02045 g002
Figure 3. SiC diodes’ turn-off current waveforms at 25 °C inductive load [73].
Figure 3. SiC diodes’ turn-off current waveforms at 25 °C inductive load [73].
Micromachines 14 02045 g003
Figure 4. Calculated converter efficiency for a 1200-V SiC MOSFET system versus that based on an IGBT/SiC diode hybrid power module [83].
Figure 4. Calculated converter efficiency for a 1200-V SiC MOSFET system versus that based on an IGBT/SiC diode hybrid power module [83].
Micromachines 14 02045 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of a Si IGBT vs. SiC MOSFET system control of a robot arm [84].
Figure 5. Comparison of a Si IGBT vs. SiC MOSFET system control of a robot arm [84].
Micromachines 14 02045 g005
Figure 6. Evaluation of wideband power semiconductor modules designed and manufactured by GE Aerospace [115,116,117].
Figure 6. Evaluation of wideband power semiconductor modules designed and manufactured by GE Aerospace [115,116,117].
Micromachines 14 02045 g006
Figure 7. SiC power module packaging structure.
Figure 7. SiC power module packaging structure.
Micromachines 14 02045 g007
Figure 8. GaN technology to significantly reduce carbon emissions and energy consumption [138].
Figure 8. GaN technology to significantly reduce carbon emissions and energy consumption [138].
Micromachines 14 02045 g008
Figure 9. Device structure of cascade GaN HEMT.
Figure 9. Device structure of cascade GaN HEMT.
Micromachines 14 02045 g009
Figure 10. 2021–2027 power GaN device market projected revenue [176].
Figure 10. 2021–2027 power GaN device market projected revenue [176].
Micromachines 14 02045 g010
Figure 11. GaN technology in various power sectors [138].
Figure 11. GaN technology in various power sectors [138].
Micromachines 14 02045 g011
Figure 12. The thermal expansion coefficient of GaN and common substrates as a function of lattice constant.
Figure 12. The thermal expansion coefficient of GaN and common substrates as a function of lattice constant.
Micromachines 14 02045 g012
Figure 13. Current collapse effect.
Figure 13. Current collapse effect.
Micromachines 14 02045 g013
Figure 14. Challenges associated with electrical isolation for GaN devices.
Figure 14. Challenges associated with electrical isolation for GaN devices.
Micromachines 14 02045 g014
Figure 15. GaN E-HEMT gate driver.
Figure 15. GaN E-HEMT gate driver.
Micromachines 14 02045 g015
Figure 16. Threshold voltage shift Vth with relation to stress time at various temperatures [204].
Figure 16. Threshold voltage shift Vth with relation to stress time at various temperatures [204].
Micromachines 14 02045 g016
Figure 17. Schematic of configurations for normally on AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with (a) Schottky gate; and (b) and insulated gate [17].
Figure 17. Schematic of configurations for normally on AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with (a) Schottky gate; and (b) and insulated gate [17].
Micromachines 14 02045 g017
Figure 18. Diamond’s hydrogen termination decreases its ionization energy and promotes electron transfer from the surface’s valence band into other materials that adsorb the electrons [212].
Figure 18. Diamond’s hydrogen termination decreases its ionization energy and promotes electron transfer from the surface’s valence band into other materials that adsorb the electrons [212].
Micromachines 14 02045 g018
Figure 19. Critical material properties of Si, 4H-SiC, and Wurtzite GaN [214].
Figure 19. Critical material properties of Si, 4H-SiC, and Wurtzite GaN [214].
Micromachines 14 02045 g019
Figure 20. State-of-the-art commercial Si power devices in terms of the upper boundary of the voltage and current ratings achieved in a single-packaged device. The current rating shown is the DC rating at a case temperature of 85 °C.
Figure 20. State-of-the-art commercial Si power devices in terms of the upper boundary of the voltage and current ratings achieved in a single-packaged device. The current rating shown is the DC rating at a case temperature of 85 °C.
Micromachines 14 02045 g020
Figure 21. State-of-the-art commercial WBG power devices in terms of the upper boundary of the voltage and current ratings achieved in a single-packaged device. The current rating shown is the DC rating at a case temperature of 25 °C.
Figure 21. State-of-the-art commercial WBG power devices in terms of the upper boundary of the voltage and current ratings achieved in a single-packaged device. The current rating shown is the DC rating at a case temperature of 25 °C.
Micromachines 14 02045 g021
Figure 22. Flow of the characteristics of WBG semiconductor devices in terms of the parameter capabilities (blue); physical properties affected by WBG advantages (red); power electronics characteristics (green); and product benefits (yellow).
Figure 22. Flow of the characteristics of WBG semiconductor devices in terms of the parameter capabilities (blue); physical properties affected by WBG advantages (red); power electronics characteristics (green); and product benefits (yellow).
Micromachines 14 02045 g022
Figure 23. Power electronic market size projection: Will surpass USD 94.21 Billion revenue by 2032.
Figure 23. Power electronic market size projection: Will surpass USD 94.21 Billion revenue by 2032.
Micromachines 14 02045 g023
Table 1. Evaluation of power electronic Si-based semiconductor device.
Table 1. Evaluation of power electronic Si-based semiconductor device.
YearDeviceSpecificationsMilestoneFeatures
1950sThyristor/SCRUp to 1000 V, 100 AFirst thyristor inventionLow on-state loss
1956Power diodeUp to 300 V, 10 AFirst commercial Si power diodeHigher switching speed than selenium diodes
1958Power transistorUp to 60 V, 10 AFirst Si power transistorHigher gain and frequency than germanium transistors
1960sSCRUp to 1000 V, 100 AWidespread SCR adoptionPhase control for AC power control
1970sPower MOSFETUp to 500 V, 10 AFirst commercial power MOSFETHigher switching speed than BJTs
1978IGBT600 V, 10 AInvention of IGBTMOSFET speed with BJT bidirectional capability
1980sBJTUp to 1200 V, 10 AImproved high-voltage BJTsOptimized for high-voltage applications
MOSFETUp to 900 V, 100 ATrench gate and VDMOSReduced on-resistance
1990sMOSFETUp to 900 V, 100 ADouble-diffused MOSFETFurther on-resistance reduction
IGBT1200 V, 50 ATrench gate IGBTLower losses than planar IGBTs
2000sIGBT6500 V, 1200 A3rd-gen trench gate IGBTNear ideal switching behavior
MOSFET900 V, 150 ASuper junction MOSFETLow on-resistance, fast switching
2010sIGBT6500 V, 1500 A4th-gen field stop IGBTsMinimized tail current
2020sIGBT, MOSFETImprovementSiC and GaN emergingImproved, but Si is phased out for WBG
Table 2. Future of Multi-Si, Mono-Si, and Ribbon-Si technology.
Table 2. Future of Multi-Si, Mono-Si, and Ribbon-Si technology.
Wafer TechnologyMulti-SiMono-SiRibbon-Si
Si feedstock production (MWp)160--
Crystallization and wafer (mm)150 × 150125 × 125 150 × 150
Cell processing (cells)72 --
Module assemblyFrameless Framed Frameless
Wafer thickness (µm)285–>150 270–300 300–>200
Module efficiency (%)13.2–>1614–>1511.5–>15
Table 3. Characteristics of selected Si MOSFETs [42].
Table 3. Characteristics of selected Si MOSFETs [42].
Part Number Current (A)CISS (pF)CGD (pF)Rds(on) (25) (Ω)
IXFP20N50P3M2.5180070.3
IXFP20N50P3M5180070.3
IXFH16N50P310151570.3
IXFR64N50P209700300.095
IXFR80N50Q34010,0001150.05
Table 4. Specifications of Si-based semiconductor device.
Table 4. Specifications of Si-based semiconductor device.
ParameterUnitSi
BJT
Si
Diode
Si
MOSFET
Si
IGBT
Si
Thyristor/GTO
Voltage ratingkV0.81.20.61.24
Current ratingA1540100503000
Switching frequencykHz10202020<1
Channel resistanceΩ-cm2--30--
Off-state breakdown voltagekV0.80.60.61.24
Maximum junction temperature°C150150150150150
Conduction losses HighLowMediumMediumLow
Switching losses MediumLowLowHighHigh
Power losses HighLowMediumHighMedium
Applications Low voltage, low frequencyRectification, voltage clampingLow voltage, high frequencyMedium voltage, medium frequencyHigh voltage, low frequency
Table 5. Comparison of Si-based semiconductor devices.
Table 5. Comparison of Si-based semiconductor devices.
FeaturesSi
Diode
Si
MOSFET
Si-SJ
MOSFET
Si
IGBT
ScalabilityScalable to high power levelsScalable to medium power levelsScalable to high power levels with parallel modulesScalable to high power levels with parallel modules
CostLow to moderate cost compared to other power semiconductorsLow to moderate cost compared to other power semiconductorsModerate to high cost compared to other power semiconductorsModerate cost compared to other power semiconductors
Type of failureTypically fails due to reverse breakdown, overcurrent, or excessive temperature.Typically fails due to overvoltage, overcurrent, or overheatingTypically fails due to overvoltage, overcurrent, or overheatingTypically fails due to overvoltage, overcurrent, or overheating
ApplicationsPower supplies, rectifiers, freewheeling diodes, flyback diodes, voltage clamping, snubber circuits, battery chargingSwitched mode power supplies, lighting, audio amplifiers, consumer electronics, automotive applicationsPower supplies, solar inverters, server power supplies, industrial applicationsMotor drives, industrial applications, renewable energy systems, UPSs, electric vehicles
Table 6. Evaluation of power electronic SiC-based semiconductor device.
Table 6. Evaluation of power electronic SiC-based semiconductor device.
YearDeviceSpecificationsMilestoneFeatures
1990sSchottky diode600 V, 1 AFirst commercial SiC diodeHigher voltage capability than Si
2001JFET1200 V, 5 AFirst SiC transistorHigher bandgap than Si devices
2006MOSFET1200 V, 10 AFirst commercial SiC MOSFETHigher frequency capability than Si IGBTs
2010sMOSFET1700 V, 100 ATrench gate SiC MOSFETsReduced on-resistance
JFET1700 V, 50 ANormally-off SiC JFETsSimpler gate drive than depletion mode
BJT1200 V, 15 AHigher current SiC BJTsImproved SOA over Si BJTs
SBD1700 V, 20 ALow loss SiC Schottky diodesFaster switching than Si PiN diodes
2015MOSFET3300 V, 24 AHigher voltage SiC MOSFETsExpanding adoption in EV/PV markets
2018IGBT3300 V, 100 AFirst commercial SiC IGBTsEntering higher power applications
2020sMOSFET>10 kV, >100 AVoltage and current increaseReplacing Si IGBTs and thyristors
FutureIGBT>10 kV, >100 ASiC IGBT refinementCompeting with Si IGBTs
GaNGaN/SiC Combining GaN and SiCPerformance greater than either alone
Table 7. Characteristics of selected SiC MOSFETs [28].
Table 7. Characteristics of selected SiC MOSFETs [28].
Part Number Current (A)CISS (pF)CGD (pF)Rds(on) (25) (Ω)
IMW120R350M1H2.518010.35
C3M0280090J515020.28
IMW120R220M1H1028920.22
C3M0120100K2035030.12
SCT4026DE40232090.026
SCT4013DR804580100.013
Table 8. Electrical characteristics of SiC-IGBT and Si-IGBT devices [94].
Table 8. Electrical characteristics of SiC-IGBT and Si-IGBT devices [94].
ManufacturerAdvanced Power TechnologySemikronMitsubishi
Device typeSiC-IGBTSiC-IGBTSi-IGBT
Part numberAPT60GF120JRDQ3SK25GH063CM150DY-24A
Used experimentsSPTThree-phase
inverter
AGPU, SPT,
Three-phase inverter
IC (A)2.12.12.1
V (V)3.02.32.4
Rce(on) (mΩ)3333356
Turn-on energy ET, on (mJ)14.61.14
Turn-off energy ET, off (mJ)6.50.816
Table 9. Specification of the SiC-based semiconductor device.
Table 9. Specification of the SiC-based semiconductor device.
ParameterUnit3C-SiC BJT6H-SiC JFET4H-SiC SBD4H-SiC MOSFET
BandgapeV2.23.03.263.26
Critical electric fieldMv/cm1.5333
Electron mobilitycm2/V-s1000370800800
Saturated electron drift velocitycm/s2e62e62e62e6
Thermal conductivityW/cm-K4.94.94.94.9
Lattice mismatch%3.53.53.53.5
Wafer sizemm100150150150
Voltage ratingkV1.21.71.71.7
Current ratingA15102424
Switching frequencyHz1050-100
ResistivityΩ-cm104104104104
Channel resistanceΩ-cm212035-80
Stress levels of voltageV500010,00010,00010,000
Stress levels of currentA15102424
Off-state breakdown voltagekV1.21.71.71.7
Maximum junction temperature°C500500600600
Temperature range°C−55 to 250−55 to 250−55 to 300−55 to 300
Temperature stability°C1111
Conduction losses MediumLowLowLow
Switching losses MediumMedium-High
Power losses MediumMediumLowMedium
Baliga’s figure of merit 51204408408
Johnson’s figure of merit 8316262
Applications Medium voltage, medium frequencyHigh voltage, high frequencyHigh voltage rectifierHigh voltage, high frequency
Table 10. Comparison between Si-based and SiC-based generator controller [115,116].
Table 10. Comparison between Si-based and SiC-based generator controller [115,116].
ParametersUnitSi-Based
Generator Controller
SiC-Based
Generator Controller
Output powerkW100200
Aux SSPC channels kWNo (Excitation Controller)120 (2ea 600 V × 100 A)
Bi-directional -YesYes
Space claim (volume)L33.617.4
Sizemm444 × 400 × 189350 × 350 × 142
Power density (size)kW/L312
WeightKg27.725
Power density (weight)kW/kg3.68
Coolant temp, max°C85105
Ambient temp, max°C71121
Communications-IEEE 1394B BusCANBus
Table 11. SiC power module by GE Aerospace [117].
Table 11. SiC power module by GE Aerospace [117].
Type of SiC ModulePart Number Voltage Rating (V)Current Rating
(A)
RDS(on)
@25 °C
(mΩ)
Thermal Cooling System (Rth(j-c))
(K/W)
Size
(Width × Length) (mm)
Maximum Junction Temp
(°C)
Half-bridgeGE12047CCA312004753.10.148 × 86175
GE17042CCA317004253.8
GE12090CDA312008751.60.03100 × 140
GE17080CDA317007651.9
GE12160CEA3120014251.00.0390 × 134
GE17140CEA3170012751.2
Dual-bridge GE12047BCA312004753.10.148 × 86
GE17042BCA317004253.8
6-switch GE12050HEA312006 × 4753.10.190 × 134
GE17045HEA317006 × 4254.8
6-packGE12050EEA312003 × 4753.10.1
GE17045EEA317003 × 4253.8
Table 12. Evaluation of power electronic GaN-based semiconductor device.
Table 12. Evaluation of power electronic GaN-based semiconductor device.
YearDeviceSpecificationsMilestoneFeatures
1990sHEMT50 V, 1 AFirst GaN transistorHigher frequency than Si and GaAs
2000sHEMT200 V, 1 AEnhancement mode GaNNormally off operation
2010sHEMT600 V, 30 AHigh-voltage GaN transistorsReplacing Si MOSFETs in adapters
MISFET200 V, 1 AGaN MISFETsGate oxide reliability improvements
2015HEMT1200 V, 15 A>1 kV rating achievedEntering high-voltage applications
2019MISFET650 V, 20 ACommercial GaN MISFETsReduced gate leakage over HEMTs
2020sHEMT3.3 kV+, 100 A+High current densityTargeting EV traction inverters
MISFET3.3 kV+, high currentFurther MISFET refinementImproved reliability over HEMTs
FutureIGBT1.2 kV+, high currentGaN on Si IGBTsImproving Si substrates and vertical GaN
ThyristorMedium voltage, high currentGaN thyristorsHigh-current applications
Table 13. GaN rectifier diode specification by Avogy, now known as Nexgen Power Systems [166].
Table 13. GaN rectifier diode specification by Avogy, now known as Nexgen Power Systems [166].
ModelTypeURRM/VIf/AIR/μAQC/nC
AVDO2A600ASBD60021504
AVDO5A120APN120050.17
AVDO5A170APN170050.114
Table 14. Characteristics of commercial GaN MOSFETs [28].
Table 14. Characteristics of commercial GaN MOSFETs [28].
Part Number Current (A)CISS (pF)CGD (pF)Rds(on) @25 °C (Ω)
TP65H150G4PS2.530710.15
TP65H150G4PS530710.15
TP65H150G4PS1030710.15
TP65H070L2060040.072
TP65H035WSQA401500140.035
Table 15. Specification of the different GaN-based semiconductor devices.
Table 15. Specification of the different GaN-based semiconductor devices.
ParameterUnitGaN HEMTGaN MISFETGaN SBD
BandgapeV3.43.43.4
Critical electric fieldMv/cm3.33.33.3
Electron mobilitycm2/V-s200015002000
Saturated electron drift velocitycm/s1 × 1051 × 1051 × 105
Thermal conductivityW/cm-K1.31.31.3
Lattice mismatch%151515
Wafer sizemm150150150
Voltage ratingkV1.211.2
Current ratingA302030
Switching frequencyHz1000500-
ResistivityΩ-cm106106106
Channel resistanceΩ-cm2810-
Stress levels of voltageV600500600
Stress levels of currentA302030
Off-state breakdown voltagekV1.211.2
Maximum junction temperature°C250250250
Temperature range°C−55 to 250−55 to 250−55 to 250
Temperature stability°C---
Conduction losses MediumMediumLow
Switching losses LowMedium-
Power losses MediumMediumLow
Baliga’s figure of merit 262626
Johnson’s figure of merit 462346
Applications High frequencyMedium frequencyRectifier
Table 16. Most popular GaN driver solutions [31].
Table 16. Most popular GaN driver solutions [31].
Manufacturer ModelSplit
Outputs
Bootstrap Voltage ManagementConfigurationFeatures
Micromachines 14 02045 i001PE29101YesYesHalf-bridge Frequency < 33 MHz
PE29102YesNoHalf-bridge Frequency < 33 MHz
Micromachines 14 02045 i002LMG1205YesYesHalf-bridge Automotive-qualified
LM5113-Q1YesYesHalf-bridge General purpose
Micromachines 14 02045 i003uP1966AYesYesHalf-bridge General purpose
Table 17. Evaluation of diamond-based semiconductor device.
Table 17. Evaluation of diamond-based semiconductor device.
YearDeviceSpecificationsMilestoneFeatures
1980sSchottky diodeSingle-crystal research onlyFirst diamond electronicsExtremely high bandgap
1990sSchottky diodeSingle-crystal, <100 VSmall single-crystal diodesHigh-temperature operation
2000sSchottky diodePolycrystalline, 400 VFirst polycrystalline devicesManufacturable on poly diamond films
2010sVertical JFETPolycrystalline, 50 VFirst diamond vertical transistorsBlocking voltage and operating temperature increase
2018Lateral MOSFETPolycrystalline, 200 VDiamond lateral MOSFETHigh current density demonstrated
2020sVertical MOSFETPolycrystalline, >1 kVDiamond vertical power MOSFETsTargeting commercial viability
FutureBipolar transistorPolycrystalline, >1 kVHigh-voltage diamond bipolar transistorsComplementing MOSFETs
Thyristor>10 kV blocking voltageUltra-high voltage rectifiers and switchesSurpassing limitations of existing technologies
IGBT>10 kV, high current densityDiamond IGBTsTheoretical capabilities unmatched by any material
Table 18. Specification of diamond-based semiconductor device.
Table 18. Specification of diamond-based semiconductor device.
ParameterUnitDiamond
Bipolar Transistor
Diamond
Schottky Diode
Diamond
MISFET
BandgapeV5.455.455.45
Critical electric fieldMv/cm101010
Electron mobilitycm2/V-s180022001800
Saturated electron drift velocitycm/s2.7 × 1072.7 × 1072.7 × 107
Thermal conductivityW/cm-K222222
Voltage ratingkV>10>10>10
Current ratingA5105
Switching frequencyHz>1000->1000
ResistivityΩ-cm>1011>1011>1011
Channel resistanceΩ-cm2<1-<1
Stress levels of voltageV>10,000>10,000>10,000
Stress levels of currentA5105
Off-state breakdown voltagekV>10>10>10
Maximum junction temperature°C>600>600>600
Temperature range°C−55 to 250−55 to 250−55 to 250
Conduction losses Very LowVery LowVery low
Switching losses Low-Low
Power losses Very LowVery LowVery low
Baliga’s figure of merit 165016501650
Johnson’s figure of merit 288288288
Applications High power, high frequencyRectifierHigh power, high frequency
Table 19. Comparisons of the specifications of Si, SiC, GaN, and diamond.
Table 19. Comparisons of the specifications of Si, SiC, GaN, and diamond.
ParameterUnitSiSiCGaNDiamond
BandgapeV1.13.0–3.43.4–3.65.45
Critical electric fieldMv/cm0.333.310
Electron mobilitycm2/V-s1500 to 2000100 to 6001000 to 20002200
Saturated electron drift velocitycm/s1052 × 1061052.7 × 107
Thermal conductivityW/cm-K1.5 to 2.03.0 to 4.91.0 to 1.522
Lattice mismatch%-3.515-
Wafer sizemm300150150-
Voltage ratingkV<1101.2>10
Current ratingA100203010
Switching frequencyHz20 k400 k1 M>1 M
Power density (size-wise)W/cm2~5~10~30>100
Power density (weight-wise)W/g~5~10~20>100
ResistivityΩ-cm10104106>1011
Channel resistanceΩ-cm23058<1
Stress levels of voltageV60010,000600>10,000
Stress levels of currentA1001003010
Off-state breakdown voltagekV0.6101.2>10
Maximum junction temperature°C150600250>600
Temperature range°C−55 to 200−55 to 300−55 to 250−55 to 250
Temperature stability°C-1--
Conduction losses HighLowMediumVery Low
Switching losses LowHighMediumLow
Power losses HighMediumMediumVery Low
Baliga’s figure of merit 1408261650
Johnson’s figure of merit 16246288
Applications Low voltage
low power
High voltage,
high power
High frequencyHigh power, high frequency
Table 20. Material characteristics of WBG and UWBG semiconductors [17].
Table 20. Material characteristics of WBG and UWBG semiconductors [17].
ParameterUnit WBGUWBG
GaN4H-SiCAlGaN/AlNβ-Ga2O3Diamond
Bandgap eV3.43.3Up to 6.04.95.5
Thermal conductivity (Ԑ)Wm−1K−1253370253–31911–272290–3450
Substrate quality (dislocations)per cm2≈104≈102≈104≈104≈105
Substrate diameterinch8 (on Si)8241
Demonstrated p-type dopability-Good GoodPoorNoGood
Demonstrated p-type dopability-GoodGoodModerateModerateModerate
Table 21. State-of-the-art performance ranges for the evaluated powers and frequencies [28].
Table 21. State-of-the-art performance ranges for the evaluated powers and frequencies [28].
P (kW)SiSiCGaN
1-Up to 14 kHz14–500 kHz
2-Up to 28 kHz28–500 kHz
4-Up to 55 kHz55–500 kHz
8-Up to 110 kHz110–500 kHz
16-1–500 kHz-
Table 22. Figure-of-merit comparison of Si, SIC, GaN, and diamond materials [214].
Table 22. Figure-of-merit comparison of Si, SIC, GaN, and diamond materials [214].
ParameterUnit Si4H-SiCWurtzite GaNDiamond
Electron mobility (µ)cm2/V-s136070015002200
Relative dielectric constant (Ԑ)-11.79.78.95.7
Circuit electric field (Ec)MV/cm0.32.23.320
Thermal conductivity (σth)W/cm-K1.33.713.320
HMFOMEc õ15.2611.5584.79
HCAFOMԐ E2c √µ131.9996.662753.9
HTFOMσth/Ԑ Ec10.470.120.47
Table 23. A device level comparison among three unipolar power transistors. Si MOSFET = IXTH30N60P, SJ MOSFET = IPD65R225C7, SJ MOSFET = C3M0280090D, GaN HFET = GS66504B estimated die size [220].
Table 23. A device level comparison among three unipolar power transistors. Si MOSFET = IXTH30N60P, SJ MOSFET = IPD65R225C7, SJ MOSFET = C3M0280090D, GaN HFET = GS66504B estimated die size [220].
ParameterUnit Si
MOSFET
Si-SJ
MOSFET
SiC
MOSFET
GaN
HEFT
Breakdown voltageV600650900600
Breakdown currentA301111.515
Wafer sizemm-200100150
Die areamm2416.62.16.5
Current density A/cm2-170540230
Ron0.240.220.280.11
DFOM1 (Ron × Qg) Ω-nC19.684.42.660.11
DFOM2 (Ron × Qgd)Ω-nC7.21.320.950.11
DFOM3 (Ron × Qoss) Ω-nC48.983.76.933.08
DFOM4 (Ron × Qrr)Ω-nC960132013.162.8
Rjc °C/W0.231.992.31
Normalized die costσth/Ԑ Ec-143.6
Table 24. Features and values comparison among Si, SiC, GaN, and diamond.
Table 24. Features and values comparison among Si, SiC, GaN, and diamond.
MaterialDeviceVoltage
(V)
Current
(A)
Frequency
(kHz)
ApplicationsPackageFeaturesManufacturer
SiIGBT6500120020Motor drives, power supplies, convertersDiscrete, ModuleHigh power capability, easy to parallelInfineon, STMicroelectronics
MOSFET900150100Switching power supplies, motor drivesDiscrete, ModuleFast switching, low lossesInfineon, ON Semiconductor
SiCMOSFET1700100100EV drivetrains, PV inverters, power suppliesDiscrete, ModuleHigh efficiency, high frequency, high temperatureWolfspeed, Rohm
SBD170020-HVDC, motor drives, battery chargingDiscreteLow loss rectification, fast recoveryWolfspeed, Infineon
GaNHEMT1200151000Adapters, data center power, wireless powerDiscrete, ModuleHigh frequency, high efficiencyEfficient Power Conversion, Navitas
MISFET65020500On-board chargers, power supplies, DC–DC convertersDiscreteNormally off, low lossesTransphorm, Panasonic
Diamond
Schottky Diode4000.1-High-temperature electronicsResearchExtremely high-temperature capabilityAkhan Semiconductor
JFET500.1-High-temperature electronicsResearchHigh bandgap, temperature toleranceGroup4 Labs
Table 25. Current commercial semiconductor devices and their ratings.
Table 25. Current commercial semiconductor devices and their ratings.
Manufacturing Company Device Type Part NumberVoltage Rating
(V)
Current Rating
(A)
Switching Frequency (Hz)Operating Temp. (°C)
Micromachines 14 02045 i004Si Diode
[241]
NXH80B120L2Q0SNG 1000 to 120030 to 40010 k−40 to 175
SiC Diode
[242]
FFSM1065A650 to 17004 to 20-−55 to 175
SiC MOSFET
[243,244]
NVBG095N065SC1, NTH4L028N170M1650 to 170030 to 811 M14 to 175
Micromachines 14 02045 i005GaN Transistor
[245,246]
IGOT60R042D1, IGLD60R070D1400 to 60060 to 12.2100 k−55 to 150
Si Diode
[247,248]
IDW100E60, IDP30E120XKSA1600 to 120028 to 15018 k to 100 k−55 to 150
SiC MOSFET [205,249]IMBG65R022M1H, DF419MR20W3M1HFB11650 to 2000 50 to 60_−55 to 150
Automotive IGBT
[250,251]
F450R07W1H3B11A, FS380R12A6T4B650 to 120050 to 3802 k to 50 k−40 to 125
Micromachines 14 02045 i006GaN HEMT [252]GNE1040TB150 to 15010 to 20-−55 to 150
SiC MOSFET [253,254]SCT3017AL, SCT3017ALHR, SCT2H12NY650 to 170021 to 041 M−55 to 175
Si MOSFET
[255,256]
HP8JE5, HP8KC6, HP8MB5, UT6MA320 to 404.5 to 5.5_−55 to 150
Ignition IGBT [257]RGPR10BM40FH, RGPR20NL43HR400–43020 to 30_−55 to 175
Micromachines 14 02045 i007
ST Microelectronics
SiC Diode
[258,259]
STPSC2006CW, STPSC40H12C600 to 1200 10 to 401 M−40 to 175
SiC MOSFET
[112,260]
SCT1000N170650 to 1700 7 to 30012 k to 25 k−55 to 200
GaN HEMT [261,262]MASTERGAN1, MASTERGAN3600 to 650 10 to 10.5500 k to 2 M−40 to 150
IGBTs
[263]
STG15M120F3D7, STG200G65FD8AG300 to 1700 10 to 2001 M−55 to 150
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rafin, S.M.S.H.; Ahmed, R.; Haque, M.A.; Hossain, M.K.; Haque, M.A.; Mohammed, O.A. Power Electronics Revolutionized: A Comprehensive Analysis of Emerging Wide and Ultrawide Bandgap Devices. Micromachines 2023, 14, 2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14112045

AMA Style

Rafin SMSH, Ahmed R, Haque MA, Hossain MK, Haque MA, Mohammed OA. Power Electronics Revolutionized: A Comprehensive Analysis of Emerging Wide and Ultrawide Bandgap Devices. Micromachines. 2023; 14(11):2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14112045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rafin, S M Sajjad Hossain, Roni Ahmed, Md. Asadul Haque, Md. Kamal Hossain, Md. Asikul Haque, and Osama A. Mohammed. 2023. "Power Electronics Revolutionized: A Comprehensive Analysis of Emerging Wide and Ultrawide Bandgap Devices" Micromachines 14, no. 11: 2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14112045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop