Next Article in Journal
Magnetic Forces by Permanent Magnets to Manipulate Magnetoresponsive Particles in Drug-Targeting Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Study of Magnetic Particle Motion inside the Nasal Cavity under the Impact of an External Magnetic Field for Biomedical Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Ku-Band Miniaturized System-in-Package Using HTCC for Radar Transceiver Module Application

1
Microwave Technology Research and Development Center, Beijing Institute of Radio Measurement, Beijing 100854, China
2
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(11), 1817; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111817
Submission received: 16 September 2022 / Revised: 15 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 October 2022 / Published: 24 October 2022

Abstract

:
This paper introduces a miniaturized system in package (SIP) for a Ku-band four-channel RF transceiver front-end. The SIP adopts the packaging scheme of an inner heat-dissipation gasket and multi-layer substrate in the high temperature co-fired ceramics (HTCC) shell with a metal heat sink at the bottom. The gasket effectively solves the heat-dissipation problem of high-power transceiver chips, and the multi-layer substrate achieves the interconnection between multiple chips. Within the limited size of 14.0 × 14.0 × 2.5 mm3, the SIP integrates five bidirectional amplifier chips, an amplitude-phase control multi-function chip, and two power modulation chips to realize the Ku-band four-channel RF transceiver front-end. Transmitting power over 0.5 W (27dBm) and receiving noise figure of 3.4 dB are achieved in the Ku-band. The efficient heat dissipation, high air tightness, and excellent integration are simultaneously realized in this SIP. The measurement results show that the performance is stable in the receiving and transmitting states, and the SIP based on HTCC technology has specific prospects for radar transceiver application.

1. Introduction

Ceramic material products have developed rapidly in recent years and have been widely used in many fields [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Ceramic package products have high packaging density, good electrical and thermal performance, and high reliability [9,10]. Compared with plastic and metal materials, they have obvious advantages in packaging, including good air tightness, high thermal conductivity, difficulty producing micro-cracks, and high-temperature tolerance. They also have broad application prospects in high-power micro-assembled circuits. High temperature co-fired ceramics (HTCC) [11,12,13,14,15,16] use high melting-point metals such as tungsten, molybdenum, manganese, etc. They are printed on aluminum oxide or an aluminum nitride ceramic green body according to circuit design requirements. About 6% of the sintering aid is then laminated in multiple layers and co-fired at a high temperature of 1600 °C. The typical processes include green tape casting, cutting, punching, hole-filling printing, lamination, firing, etc.
With the rapid development of integrated circuits, new materials, and packaging technology, active phased array radars are widely used in military and commercial applications. Transceiver modules are the key elements in many systems, and their size and weight are subject to severe constraints. This paper presents a Ku-band transceiver SIP module based on self-developed multi-function chips to meet these constraints. The module’s air tightness and heat dissipation are highly required in the radar transceiver system. Therefore, the SIP based on the ceramics package is appropriate for the radar application. Common types of ceramics packages are ceramic dual in-line package (CDIP), ceramic small outline package (CSOP), ceramic four-sided lead flat package (CQFP), ceramic pin grid matrix package (CPGA), ceramic ball grid matrix package (CBGA), etc. The ceramic package is widely used in numerous application fields, such as radio frequency filters (SAW, BAW), radio frequency integrated circuits (RFIC), optical communications, and sensors. That is based on its high dielectric properties, low loss characteristics, thermal expansion coefficient close to silicon wafers, and high structural strength.
The Quad Flat No-lead Package (QFN) is a widely used surface mount chip packaging technology with a small pad size and volume [17]. The QFN has excellent electrical and thermal performance because the large exposed pad in the bottom center is soldered to the carrier. The QFN is a leadless package, which is square or rectangular. There is a large-area exposed pad in the center of the package bottom, which affects heat conduction. There are also conductive pads for electrical connection on the periphery of the package at the bottom. The QFN package does not have gull-wing leads like the traditional small outline integrated circuit package (SOIC) or the thin small outline package (TSOP). Therefore, for the QFN, the conductive path between the internal pins and the bottom pads is short, and the self-inductance coefficient and the wiring resistance in the package are low. These characteristics give the QFN package outstanding electrical performance [18,19,20,21,22,23]. In addition, it also provides excellent thermal performance through exposed lead frame pads, which are direct thermal channels for dissipating heat within the package. Typically, thermal pads are soldered directly to the board, and thermal vias in the PCB help to dissipate excess power into the copper ground plane, which could absorb the excess heat. Due to its small size, light weight, and outstanding electrical and thermal properties, this package is ideal for applications in which size, weight, and performance are critical.
Although plastic packages can achieve lower costs, the products of the plastic package have significant defects in the reliability of packaging, internal thermal characteristics, storage, and application. Therefore, some devices need to be replaced by ceramic package products for several reasons: (a) package air tightness: plastic-packaged semiconductor devices are prone to inhalation of moisture; (b) limited internal thermal characteristics: different thermal expansion coefficients between plastic, frame, and chip; (c) limited application: plastic-packaged products are non-hermetic packages with poor thermal conductivity, which makes them unsuitable for high-power devices, and they are also greatly limited in aerospace and space applications.
In recent years, many papers have reported high-performance Ku-band transceivers implemented by different integration methods. Some research results [24,25,26] used CMOS and SiGe semiconductor processes to achieve monolithic integration. Although the chip size was small, only a single-channel transceiver was realized, and the transmission power was less than 15 dBm. The authors of [27] achieved the Ku-band four-channel transceiver using the 180 nm CMOS semiconductor process. Every single channel transceiver with an on-chip antenna occupied 6.2 × 1.3 mm2 with a relatively high degree of integration, but the transmission power was only 14 dBm. The author of [28] adopted HTCC process technology to realize the broadband transceiver through SIP integration. The overall size of the SIP was 16 × 16 × 2.6 mm3. The bottom heat dissipation was carried out through an AlN ceramic substrate, but the transmission power and heat dissipation were not described in detail. The authors of [29] adopted LTCC process technology to realize single-channel SIP. The larger size of the SIP was 55 mm × 20 mm × 4.5 mm, which is not appropriate for the miniaturization integration of radar transceiver channels.
This paper uses HTCC package technology for high integration to realize a low-cost and miniaturized Ku-band multi-channel transceiver RF front-end with 0.5 W (27 dBm) transmitting power. Compared with all the above studies, this paper additionally integrates the pulse modulation function of radar transceiver switching in SIP. However, it is a crucial issue for miniaturized radar RF transceiver front-ends to achieve efficient heat dissipation, high air tightness, and excellent integration when packaged. This paper proposes a QFN package structure to reduce the package size effectively. By adopting a package solution in which a heat dissipation gasket and a multi-layer substrate are constructed in the HTCC shell with a metal heat sink at the bottom, efficient heat dissipation, high air tightness, and excellent integration are simultaneously realized. These are the main advantages of this SIP compared with other packages [30]. This SIP is suitable for implementing the radar transceiver system and engineering applications.

2. Materials and Methods

In the phased array design, the unit spacing of each transceiver module depends entirely on the operating frequency of the system. The designed working frequency of this module was 14.5–16.5 GHz in the Ku-band. At this frequency range, the spacing between the radiating units of each transceiver module was about 10 mm. Each unit sub-module had the same function and interface. Therefore, in the design, multiple channels are considered to be integrated with only one package, which could share the module’s power and control signals and improve the unit area’s use efficiency [31,32,33].
This paper provides a miniaturized system in package (SIP) for a Ku-band four-channel RF transceiver front-end for radar application [34,35]. The SIP integrates a variety of chips with different functions, including four bidirectional amplifier chips (BA1), one bidirectional amplifier chip (BA2), one amplitude and phase control multi-function chip (APCMF), one receiver power modulation chip (RPM), and one transmitter power modulation chip (TPM) [36]. These chips were integrated through the packaging solution of an inner heat dissipation gasket and multi-layer substrate in the HTCC shell with a metal heat sink at the bottom. The Ku-band four-channel RF transceiver front-end system was implemented within the limited size of 14.0 × 14.0 × 2.5 mm3.
The schematic diagram of the SIP structure is shown in Figure 1. The HTCC substrate with internal vias is at the edge of the QFN package, and the metal heat sink is at the bottom of the HTCC shell. Inside the package, the molybdenum copper plate was used below the power chip to conduct heat away, and the multi-layer printed circuit board (PCB) was used as the carrier of the power modulation chip, which is implemented by the CMOS process. The upper lid of the shell was made of iron–nickel alloy material with a thickness of 0.25 mm, except the edge thickness was 0.1 mm. The microwave monolithic integrated circuits in the SIP included five bidirectional amplifiers with a thickness of 0.1 mm, and an amplitude-phase multi-function chip with a thickness of 0.1 mm. The analog integrated circuits included two power modulation chips with a thickness of 0.3 mm. The heat dissipation plate and the multi-layer PCB were located on the metal heat sink of the package. Five bidirectional amplifier chips with heat dissipation requirements were mounted on the plate. Multi-function chips and two power modulation chips were mounted on the PCB. The chips and the shell were electrically connected through gold wires and the PCB.
The manufacturing process of the SIP is presented as follows: Firstly, the HTCC substrate was produced by green tape casting, cutting, punching, hole-filling printing, lamination, firing, etc. Secondly, the HTCC substrate, metal sink, and frame were welded together to form the HTCC shell. Thirdly, inside the shell, the plate for heat dissipation and the PCB were mounted on the metal sink by gold–tin welding. Fourthly, the power chips were mounted on the plate by eutectic soldering, and the other chips were pasted on the PCB by conducting resin. Fifthly, gold wires were bonded to connect the multiple chips and HTCC shell. Finally, the HTCC shell and metal lid were welded together to form a complete SIP.
The system diagram of the SIP, which operates at 14.5–16.5 GHz, is shown in Figure 2. The Ku-band four-channel microwave chips were all implemented with a 0.25 um GaAs process, which has the advantages of lower noise figure and higher output power, including four BA1, one APCMF, and one BA2. The BA1 integrates a low-noise amplifier, a power amplifier, and a single-pole double-throw switch. The low-noise amplifier has a noise figure of 1.5 dB. The power amplifier has a saturation output power of 28 dBm and power-added efficiency of 38%. The single-pole double-throw switch has an insertion loss of 0.8 dB and high linearity characteristics, which has an output 0.1 dB compression point of 29.5 dBm. The BA2 integrates a low-noise amplifier (LNA), a power amplifier (PA), and two SPDT switches, which use the same PA, LNA switch as BA1. The APCMF integrates a serial-parallel conversion circuit (SPI), a four-way power divider, four 6-bit digital attenuators, four 6-bit digital phase shifters, and four single pole three throw switches. The SPI has the advantage of reducing the interface of control bits. The 6-bit digital attenuator has a 0.5 dB step size, 31.5 dB attenuation range, and attenuation accuracy RMS of 0.2 dB. The 6-bit digital phase shifter has a 5.625° step size and phase shift accuracy RMS of 3°. The single pole three throw switch includes three states of receive, transmit, and load. It is very convenient for single-channel measurement and performance evaluation.
COM is the common port for transmitting and receiving, and IN/OUT is the transmitting and receiving port after the power is divided into four channels. The entire SIP works with a positive power supply of +5 V for BA1, BA2, TPM, RPM, and a negative power supply of −5 V for TPM and APCMF. The control logic of the GaAs switch is −5/0 V. The current consumption of +5 V power supply is 180 mA in the receiving state and 1.5 A in the transmitting state. The current consumption of −5 V power supply is 10 mA in the receiving state and transmitting state.
The four-channel RF transceiver front-end consists of multiple inner chips. Among them, the BA2 chip is at the common port, and the four BA1 chips are responsible for amplifying the receiving and transmitting signals of the four channels. The APCMF is responsible for the shift and attenuation of the radio frequency signal, transmission and reception of the control code, and the power combination or distribution of the four channels. The TPM realizes the gate and drain voltage modulation of power amplifiers in BA1 and BA2. The RPM realizes drain voltage modulation of low noise amplifiers in BA1 and BA2.
Transceiver SIP has two working modes: one is receiving mode, and the other is transmitting mode. When it works in the receiving mode, the microwave signal enters through the BA1, passes through the multi-functional chip for amplitude and phase control, and finally enters the BA2 for output. When it works in the transmitting mode, the microwave signal enters through the BA2 and passes through the APCMF. After the phase control of the APCMF, it finally enters the output of the BA1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SIP Design and Simulation

The ceramic material used in this SIP is aluminum oxide, which has a dielectric constant of 9.2 @16 GHz and a dielectric loss tangent of 1.5 × 10−3 @16 GHz. For this material, the breakdown field strength is more than 8000 V/m, and the insulation resistance exceeds 1014 Ω·cm. For other characteristics, the thermal conductivity of this material is 17 W/m·K, and the thermal expansion coefficient is 8 ppm/°C. Due to the low thermal conductivity, the heat dissipation was mainly through the metal sink at the bottom of the package.
For electrical characteristics, to simulate the microwave performance of the SIP more accurately, first of all, it was modeled with high precision [37,38]. Based on the High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) software for 3D electromagnetic field simulation, the model of the main microwave transmission path of the SIP was established, as shown in Figure 3. The transmission path was from the chip pad, bonding wire, HTCC shell (including the transmission via at the side wall) to the PCB board. The solution type in HFSS was set as driven modal. The port 1 for excitation was set as a lumped port, and the port 2 was set as a wave port. Between the port 1 and the signal pad of the chip, there was a microstrip line of 50 ohm and a tapered line. The transition line shown in Figure 3 was used for impedance matching. The diameter and spacing of the transmission vias at the side wall were also optimized to reduce impedance discontinuity. The size of the microwave signal pad was 150 × 100 µm2, and the bonding wire adopted two parallel wires with a length of 400 µm. The substrate of the microwave chip was set as gallium arsenide (GaAs) with a dielectric constant of 12.9.
The simulation results of S-parameters are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen from the results that the insertion loss (S21) of the microwave transmission path was about 0.3 dB, and the return loss (S11/S22) was less than −18 dB in the 14.5–6.5 GHz frequency range.
The HTCC shell and the metal lid need to be welded through parallel seam welding technology to guarantee the air tightness of the package. Consequently, there was a closed cavity inside the package where multiple chips were located. The substrate surface, interior, and through-hole pillars were all tungsten, and the surface was electroplated with nickel (Ni) and gold (Au) to meet assembly requirements such as soldering or wire bonding. The internal cavity of the transceiver SIP was simulated and analyzed to evaluate its influence. The simulation model is shown in Figure 5. Based on the High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) software, the simulated frequencies and Q (quality factor) of the resonant modes inside the cavity are shown in Table 1. The Q is defined as [39]:
Q = ω average   energy   stored energy   loss / sec ond = ω Ws Ploss
The ω is the angular frequency. The solution type in HFSS is set as eigenmode. We only selected the modes with resonant frequencies that are in the operating frequency range. From Table 1, we can see that the Q factors of these modes were at low levels, indicating that the modes will rapidly attenuate. Therefore, the influence of these modes can be ignored when analyzing the microwave performance of the SIP.
According to the demands of the working radar system, the maximum transmission pulse width was 3 ms, and the maximum duty cycle was 30%. The thermal characteristics of the SIP were simulated with the actual heat dissipation of the chips [40,41], as shown in Figure 6a. The simulation was based on the Ansys Icepak software. In the simulation, the package was on the plate with a fixed temperature of 70 °C, and the heat dissipation of the chips BA1 and BA2 was set as 1.7 W, respectively. For comparison, the result of another SIP without a heat sink and gasket is shown in Figure 6b, which means that all chips were mounted on the HTCC shell directly. The thermal resistances between the chips and the packages were computed to be 0.86 °C/W and 8.96 °C/W for Figure 6a,b. These results indicate that the SIP with a heat sink and gasket had a better ability for heat dissipation.

3.2. Measurement and Analysis

The photograph of the Ku-band four-channel transceiver SIP is shown in Figure 7. All microwave chips, power modulation chips, and several surface-mounted capacitors were integrated in the package. The outer dimension, including the frame and top metal lid, was 14.0 × 14.0 × 2.5 mm3.
The test fixture of the Ku-band four-channel transceiver SIP is shown in Figure 8. The SIP was mounted on the multi-layer microwave printed circuit board (PCB) by welding. External cables connected the power and control terminal to the test instrument. After the top metal lid was sealed by parallel sealing technology, the measurement shows that the air-tightness rate of this module was 9 × 1010 Pa·m3/s.
The vector network analyzer was used for testing to verify the actual performance of the proposed SIP. When testing in the receiving mode, the main test contents included receiving linear gain, noise figure (NF), output 1dB compression point, attenuation accuracy, phase shifting accuracy, and other indicators. When testing in the transmitting mode, the main test contents included saturated output power, power added efficiency (PAE), attenuation accuracy, phase shifting accuracy, and other indicators. The NF and linear gain curve in the receiving state are shown in Figure 9. The saturated output power and PAE curve under the transmitting state are shown in Figure 10.
It can be indicated from Table 2 that the SIP achieved the main functions of the Ku-band four-channel transceiver front-end. The attenuation and phase shift accuracy were very close between simulation and measurement because of the APCMF’s high-precision performance. However, there were still some differences between measurement and simulation results. In our opinion, the main factors resulting in the unsatisfactory measurement results were as follows: Firstly, the gold wires were difficult to bond at the periphery of the HTCC shell, which made it hard to control the shape and length of the bonding wires, thus introducing a specific insertion loss in the Ku-band. Secondly, for the transmission via hole at the side wall of the HTCC shell shown in Figure 3, there were differences between the actual dimension and the simulation model, and further optimization is needed. Thirdly, the crosstalk and interaction between multiple chips inside the package were not considered in detail in the simulation. When the SIP was working, the main crosstalk was between the multiple chips inside the package because the distance between the chips was so close, as shown in Figure 7. Filter capacitors were placed close to the power supply position of each microwave amplifier to reduce the signal crosstalk between the microwave chips. Moreover, the isolation of the power divider inside the four-channel APCMF was greater than 25 dB in the 14.5–16.5 GHz frequency range, which ensured that the amplitude and phase accuracy were less affected by adjacent channels. However, considering the intricate routes inside the PCB and other factors, the crosstalk of the SIP presented in the paper was more complicated and still needs further research.

4. Conclusions

A Ku-band four-channel transceiver SIP module based on HTCC technology was presented and verified. The efficient heat dissipation, high air tightness, and excellent integration were simultaneously realized in this SIP. The measured results prove that the SIP can work stably and satisfy the requirement of the system. This paper combined HTCC material, microwave monolithic integrated circuits, and miniaturized packaging technology to realize a Ku-band four-channel transceiver SIP for the miniaturization application of modern radar systems. Transmitting power over 0.5 W (27 dBm) and receiving noise figure of 3.4 dB were achieved in the Ku-band. Therefore, miniaturized SIP based on HTCC technology can be applied in large quantities in radar system transceiver components.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S. and F.Y.; methodology, F.Y.; software, B.Z.; validation, F.Y., B.Z. and L.S.; formal analysis, F.Y.; investigation, F.Y.; resources, F.Y. and B.Z.; data curation, F.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, F.Y.; writing—review and editing, B.Z. and L.S.; visualization, B.Z.; supervision, F.Y.; project administration, L.S.; funding acquisition, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 62131014 and in part by the Aerospace Independent Innovation Pre-research Project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the Microwave Technology Research and Development Center for the design simulation platform and the Beijing Institute of Radio Measurement for the financial assistance for SIP production. Special thanks to the Micro Assembly Center for help with SIP assembly and bonding multiple chips in-house and the Automated Test Lab for help with SIP test validation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Chen, L.; Qiulin, T.; Wendong, Z.; Chenyang, X.; Jijun, X. An Embedded Passive Resonant Sensor Using Frequency Diversity Technology for High Temperature Wireless Measurement. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 1055–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peter, S.; Zahra, K.; Lena, K.; Greger, T. Ceramic Pressure Sensor for High Temperatures—Investigation of the Effect of Metallization on Read Range. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 2411–2421. [Google Scholar]
  3. Michał, R.; Jolanta, M.; Katarzyna, O.; Greger, T.; Tomasz, G.; Anna, Z.; Małgorzata, A.H. The Effect of Pr Doping Contents on the Structural, Microstructure and Dielectric Properties of BaBi2Nb2O9 Aurivillius Ceramics. Materials 2022, 15, 5790. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aleksander, S.; Kostja, M. Metallization, Material Selection, and Bonding of Interconnections for Novel LTCC and HTCC Power Modules. Materials 2022, 15, 1036. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhizhuang, Q.; Linjie, L.; Yangfan, Z.; Ke, W. A Vertical Transmission Leadless Surface mountable Ceramic Package with High Core Proportion. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology Conference, Xiamen, China, 14–17 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yangfan, Z.; Linjie, L.; Zhizhuang, Q.; Ke, W.; Gai, L. A X Band Ceramic Package with Kilowatt-level High-power and Low Loss. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology Conference, Xiamen, China, 14–17 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mingsheng, M.; Yi, W.; Miguel, N.C.; Liu, F.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Hanham, S.M.; Hao, Z. Metallization, The dielectric properties of some ceramic substrate materials at terahertz frequencies. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 4424–4428. [Google Scholar]
  8. Franz, K.; Sven, S.; Jan, B.; Aleksander, G.; Dorian, A.H. Silicate dielectric ceramics for millimetre wave applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 3879–3894. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhentao, Y.; Jiangtao, C.; Linjie, L.; Pengyuan, S. Research on the influence of parallel seam welding parameters on the reliability of thin-walled ceramic. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology Conference, Dalian, China, 10–13 August 2022. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sylvain, B.; Gabriel, V. Improving Insulation Quality of Ceramic Insulated Conductors by Dip Coating with Boron Oxide. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Ins. 2019, 26, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  11. Peng, Z.; Shiwei, Q. Dual-Polarized Patch Antenna Array in HTCC Technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology Conference, Shanghai, China, 20–23 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. Diane, T.; Romain, P.; Frédéric, G.; Fabien, F.; Cyril, L.; Patrice, B.; Gilles, J.; Daniel, G. Industrial HTCC Antenna-Module SiP for 60-GHz Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2012, 11, 576–579. [Google Scholar]
  13. M´egane, B.; Vincent, P.; Damien, P.; Cros, D.; Madrangeas, V.; Chartier, T. Feasibility of manufacturing of Al2O3–Mo HTCC by hybrid additive process. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 14993–15005. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jonathan, R.; Vincent, P.; Mégane, B.; Gourdonnaud, D.; Passerieux, D.; Cros, D.; Madrangeas, V.; Michaud, P.; Chartier, T. Hybridization of additive manufacturing processes to build ceramic/metal parts: Example of HTCC. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 2023–2033. [Google Scholar]
  15. Qi, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhizhuang, Q.; Liu, L.; Gao, L. A study of a low-loss and ultra-wide band transmission structure through BGA based on HTCC technology. In Proceedings of the Information Science and Control Engineering Conference, Changsha, China, 18 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bo, Y.; Zhigang, W.; Peng, W.; Oupeng, L.; Hua, C.; Jia, H.; Guangjian, W.; Ruimin, X. High-Integration and Low-Cost Transmitter Packaging Solution for 0.2 THz SiP Application Using HTCC Technology. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Technol. Lett. 2022, 32, 680–683. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mary, J.R.; Rico, S.A.; Lynn, G.; Anang, S.; Hadi, H. The Method of Making Low-cost Multiple-Row QFN. In Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE/CPMT International Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium, Jose, CA, USA, 3–25 October 2007. [Google Scholar]
  18. Raphael, A.; Marc, P.Y.; Sumanth, K.P.; Tim, T.; Chris, B.; Jens, W. Reliability Testing and Stress Measurement of QFN Packages Encapsulated by an Open-Ended Microwave Curing System. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 9, 173–180. [Google Scholar]
  19. Martin, H.; Linus, B.; Winfried, M.; Christian, W. Radiation Pattern Optimization for QFN Packages with On-Chip Antennas at 160 GHz. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2018, 66, 4552–4562. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhiji, W.; Eun, S.K.; Junge, L.; Nam, Y.K. QFN-Packaged Bandpass Filter with Intertwined Circular Spiral Inductor and Integrated Center-Located Capacitors Using Integrated Passive Device Technology. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 13597–13607. [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin, A.; Ian, D.L.; Andy, L.; Xibo, Y. Experimental Evaluation of a Low-Cost QFN Silicon Carbide Half-Bridge Module. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 9, 1603–1612. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiyuan, L.; Campbell, B. Analysis and Experimental Study of the Package Stresses in a QFN Plastic-Encapsulated Package. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 4, 1303–1308. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yi, C.L.; Wen, H.L.; Tzyy, S.H.; Lih, T.H. Full Chip-Package-Board Co-design of Broadband QFN Bonding Transition Using Backside via and Defected Ground Structure. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 4, 1470–1479. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yong, W.; Liheng, L.; Bo, C.; Ying, Z.; Kai, T.; Lei, Q.; Supeng, L.; Yuanjin, Z. A 260-mW Ku-Band FMCW Transceiver for Synthetic Aperture Radar Sensor with 1.48-GHz Bandwidth in 65-nm CMOS Technology. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 4385–4399. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bojun, H.; Chao, L.; Sanfeng, Z.; Qiang, L. A Ku-Band SiGe Phased-Array Transceiver with 6-Bit Phase and Attenuation Control. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and System, Daegu, Korea, 23–26 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  26. Seung, H.J.; Sang, G.K.; Woon, S.C.; Hong, H.K.; Hyeoung, G.K.; Yun, S.E. High Dynamic Range Ku-band CMOS Transceiver IC for FMCW Radar Application. In Proceedings of the IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, Honololu, HI, USA, 4–9 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xiaoning, Z.; Yexi, S.; Chao, Y.; Dong, C.; Lin, Z.; Shoutian, S.; Zhilin, C.; Huihua, L.; Chenxi, Z.; Yunqiu, W.; et al. A Ku-band Phased Array in Package Integrating Four 180 nm CMOS Transceivers with On-chip Antennas. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology Conference, Shanghai, China, 20–23 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jihao, L. A Generalized Broadband Sip Package for Microwave Transceiver Module. In Proceedings of the IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, Nanjing, China, 23–26 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shuwei, H.; Zhi, H.; Dong, W.; Yijun, C. A LTCC-BGA multi-chip packaging technology for MMICs up to Ku-band. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology, Chengdu, China, 12–15 August 2021. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lin, Y.C.; Lin, Y.C.; Horng, T.S.; Hwang, L.T.; Hung, C.P. Low cost QFN package design for millimeter-wave applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE 62nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 30 July 2012. [Google Scholar]
  31. Alexandre, S.; Baudouin, M.; Olivier, R.; Mounet, C.; Chaix, F.; Ferragut, R.; Dehos, C.; Lanteri, J.; Dussopt, L.; Yamamoto, S.D.; et al. A 65-nm CMOS Fully Integrated Transceiver Module for 60-GHz Wireless HD Application. IEEE Solid-State. Circuits. J. 2011, 46, 3005–3017. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hui, X.; Zejian, C.; Yabing, Z.; Jiahao, L.; Fangzhou, C. Defect Location and Failure Analysis of Interconnection Fault for a RF SiP Module. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology Conference, Dalian, China, 10–13 August 2022. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang, Z.Z.; Wei, W.; Wang, Y.; Sun, B.; Zhang, X.W.; Xun, J.; Fei, X.X. Design of a Broadband HTCC SIP Packaging Module. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology Conference, Nanjing, China, 23–26 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, Y.; Sun, B.; Zhang, W.; Nidahai, X. Design of broadband Frequency Conversion Components based on SIP. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology Conference, Shanghai, China, 20–23 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ming, L.; Xiaozheng, L.; Zhixian, M.; Wu, B.; Duan, Z. Design and Implementation of a Compact Dual-band RF System-in-Package Module. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology Conference, Shanghai, China, 20–23 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  36. Daoyuan, C.; Minshu, M.; Jianzhuang, L. A Power Modulator Based on System-in-Package. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology Conference, Shenzhen, China, 12–15 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, Y.; Sun, B.; Wei, W.; Zhang, X.W.; Fei, X.X. Research on Broadband RF Signal Transmission Structure Applied in 3D SIP. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology Conference, Nanjing, China, 23–26 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  38. Akash, D.; Shiva, P.J.; Jilla, S.P.; Sharma, R.; Krishan, K.; Mukerji, A. Simulation-Based Impedance Characterization of PDN in High-Performance Multi-Chip HTCC Packages for Avionics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology Conference, Shenzhen, China, 12–15 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pozar, D.M. Microwave Engineering; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lu, A.; Xie, D.J.; Shi, Z.F.; Ryu, W. Electrical and thermal modelling of QFN packages. In Proceedings of the 3rd Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, Singapore, 6 August 2002. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yangyang, L.; Hui, W.; Yang, L.; Dong, D.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Y. Simulation and Thermal Fatigue Analysis for Board Level BGA Connection of HTCC Packaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE Electrical Design of Advanced Packaging and Systems Symposium Conference, Chandigarh, India, 16–18 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Diagram of the proposed SIP package structure.
Figure 1. Diagram of the proposed SIP package structure.
Micromachines 13 01817 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of Ku-band four-channel transceiver SIP.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of Ku-band four-channel transceiver SIP.
Micromachines 13 01817 g002
Figure 3. 3D electromagnetic simulation of key microwave transmission structure of the SIP.
Figure 3. 3D electromagnetic simulation of key microwave transmission structure of the SIP.
Micromachines 13 01817 g003
Figure 4. Simulation results of the S-parameters of the SIP.
Figure 4. Simulation results of the S-parameters of the SIP.
Micromachines 13 01817 g004
Figure 5. Cavity simulation model of the four-channel Ku-band transceiver SIP.
Figure 5. Cavity simulation model of the four-channel Ku-band transceiver SIP.
Micromachines 13 01817 g005
Figure 6. Simulation results of the thermal characteristic of the transceiver SIP. (a) The proposed SIP; (b) The SIP without a heat sink and gasket.
Figure 6. Simulation results of the thermal characteristic of the transceiver SIP. (a) The proposed SIP; (b) The SIP without a heat sink and gasket.
Micromachines 13 01817 g006
Figure 7. Internal photograph of the proposed transceiver SIP.
Figure 7. Internal photograph of the proposed transceiver SIP.
Micromachines 13 01817 g007
Figure 8. Test fixture of the proposed transceiver SIP.
Figure 8. Test fixture of the proposed transceiver SIP.
Micromachines 13 01817 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of simulation and measurement of the proposed Ku-band SIP in receiving state. (a) Simulated and measured noise figure curve; (b) Simulated and measured linear gain curve.
Figure 9. Comparison of simulation and measurement of the proposed Ku-band SIP in receiving state. (a) Simulated and measured noise figure curve; (b) Simulated and measured linear gain curve.
Micromachines 13 01817 g009
Figure 10. Comparison of simulation and measurement of the proposed Ku-band SIP in transmitting state. (a) Simulated and measured saturated output power curve; (b) Simulated and measured power added efficiency curve.
Figure 10. Comparison of simulation and measurement of the proposed Ku-band SIP in transmitting state. (a) Simulated and measured saturated output power curve; (b) Simulated and measured power added efficiency curve.
Micromachines 13 01817 g010
Table 1. The simulated frequency and Q factors of the resonant modes inside the cavity.
Table 1. The simulated frequency and Q factors of the resonant modes inside the cavity.
Resonant Mode123456
Frequency (GHz) 14.66 15.1815.3715.6616.2216.55
Q
Factors
186.28189.43393.15187.15192.16191.76
Table 2. Measured results of the SIP’s key performance in receiver (RX) and transmitter (TX) mode.
Table 2. Measured results of the SIP’s key performance in receiver (RX) and transmitter (TX) mode.
Key PerformanceSimulation ResultsMeasured ResultsUnit
Operating frequency range14.5–16.514.5–16.5GHz
RX linear gain24.022.5dB
RX 1dB compression output power13.212.7dBm
RX noise figure3.23.4dB
TX linear gain35.233.9dB
TX saturated output power27.627.3dBm
TX power added efficiency32.830.5%
RX/TX attenuation accuracy0.2/0.20.2/0.2dB
RX/TX phase shift accuracy2.0/2.12.3/2.5°
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, F.; Zhang, B.; Song, L. A Ku-Band Miniaturized System-in-Package Using HTCC for Radar Transceiver Module Application. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1817. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111817

AMA Style

Yang F, Zhang B, Song L. A Ku-Band Miniaturized System-in-Package Using HTCC for Radar Transceiver Module Application. Micromachines. 2022; 13(11):1817. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111817

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Fan, Bowen Zhang, and Leijun Song. 2022. "A Ku-Band Miniaturized System-in-Package Using HTCC for Radar Transceiver Module Application" Micromachines 13, no. 11: 1817. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111817

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop