Obstacle Avoidance Control of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Motor Loss-of-Effectiveness Fault Based on Improved Artificial Potential Field
Huimin Wang
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Look at the suggestions made relevant to the references made and apply throughout the document if so choose.
Further it's a well written paper.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
By your suggestion, all the comments have been addressed carefully, see the following individual responses in the attachment for details. As kindly suggested by you and the reviewers, the manuscript has been fully revised in accordance to the constructive and helpful comments from you and the reviewers for improving the quality further.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
This paper presents an obstacle avoidance control strategy for an underactuated quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle with motor loss-of-effectiveness fault and disturbance. In the reviewers' opinion, there are some confusing issues which have weaken the whole development. Please see the following issues:
1. The introduction is the head of an essay, the first paragraph of which shows the importance of the area studied. The reviewer felt that the author should have added some references to the background of UAV as appropriate.
2. Where is the "generate a new path" proposed in the first contribution of this article generated? The author is expected to answer with reference to Figure 2.
3. There are some flaws in the format of the pictures in the article. For example, the size of Figure 2 is a little too large; Figure 3 to Figure 8 the legend is slightly smaller and so on. Therefore, the author should adjust the picture format appropriately.
4. There are some defects in the formula format of this paper. For example, symbols are similar in formula selection between lines 223 and 224, which may easily lead to misunderstandings among readers. Therefore, the author should adjust the formula format appropriately.
Author Response
By your suggestion, all the comments have been addressed carefully, see the following individual responses in the attachment for details. As kindly suggested by you and the reviewers, the manuscript has been fully revised in accordance to the constructive and helpful comments from you and the reviewers for improving the quality further.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
