Next Article in Journal
Employer Branding in the Fashion Industry: CSR Actions by Fashion SMEs
Next Article in Special Issue
Incorporating Traditional Knowledge into Science-Based Sociotechnical Measures in Upper Watershed Management: Theoretical Framework, Existing Practices and the Way Forward
Previous Article in Journal
Why International Conciliation Can Resolve Maritime Disputes: A Study Based on the Jan Mayen Case
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/su15031831
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Perspective
Peer-Review Record

What Are ILK in Relation to Science? Using the ‘Ethic of Equivocation’ to Co-Produce New Knowledge for Conservation

Sustainability 2023, 15(3), 1831; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031831
by Meredith Root-Bernstein 1,2,3,*, Pierre du Plessis 4, Matías Guerrero-Gatica 2,3,5, Trupthi Narayan 6, Samuel Roturier 7 and Helen C. Wheeler 8
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4:
Shreekar Pant
Sustainability 2023, 15(3), 1831; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031831
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 6 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 18 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global and Interdisciplinary Approaches to Indigenous and Local Knowledge in Conservation Ecology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The topic of the manuscript is fresh and refreshing. Although at times monotonous, a lot of new information is being provided that is ably supported by citing literature. I suggest acceptance of the article in its current form.

Author Response

Thank you for recommending acceptance, we appreciate this positive feedback.

Reviewer 2 Report

The MS touches upon a critical question about the relationship between ILK and traditional science. It is very well written and quite logical. I don't have any major concerns. The only minor comment is that the conclusion section seems to lack discussions around the suggestions for engaging with ILK. I believe this could potentially be an important take-home message that will inform readers of how to treat ILK rigorously. I recommend the authors give more highlights on their recommendations in the revision. 

Author Response

We have added a summarising paragraph to the Conclusions to address the suggestion to add "discussions around the suggestions for engaging with ILK."  Thank you for the positive view of the paper.

Reviewer 3 Report

See the attachment for some detailed corrections. 

In some areas, the text is written with different fonts. 

A challenging paper! Congratulations!

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We have fixed the spelling and typing errors and correctly formatted the paper.  Thank you for the positive appreciation of the paper.

Reviewer 4 Report

paper is nicely written except some mistakes which can be improved  

Content of the paper is the need of the hour

Author Response

We have fixed some spelling and typing errors and correctly formatted the paper.  Thank you for the positive remarks.

Back to TopTop