Next Article in Journal
Nexus between Green Investment, Fiscal Policy, Environmental Tax, Energy Price, Natural Resources, and Clean Energy—A Step towards Sustainable Development by Fostering Clean Energy Inclusion
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact and Mechanism of the Digital Economy on Carbon Emission Efficiency: A Perspective Based on Provincial Panel Data in China
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Economy, Clean Energy Consumption, and High-Quality Economic Development: The Case of China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Ship Emissions on Air Quality in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA): With a Particular Focus on the Role of Onshore Wind
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Use of Ziziphus spina-christi as a Sustainable Solution for Biomonitoring of Urban Air Quality: A Case Study from Qatar

Environmental Science Center, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(18), 13590; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813590
Submission received: 15 June 2023 / Revised: 30 August 2023 / Accepted: 6 September 2023 / Published: 12 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Pollution Management and Environment Research)

Abstract

:
Globally, urbanization, industrialization, and transportation have worsened urban air quality in recent decades. Using sustainable, cost-effective methods to monitor and reduce air pollution is crucial. The best Nature-based Solution (NbS) for urban environmental cleanup is plants. Roadside plants are key carriers of air pollution and have various tolerances. Ziziphus spina-christi’s air pollution tolerance was assessed using the Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI). The Bioconcentration Factor (BCF) examined the heavy metal accumulation capacity of Ziziphus spina-Christi’s fruits and leaves. Two sampling sites were studied: a reference location remote from human activity and a densely populated metropolitan region. Ziziphus spina-christi is considered a tolerant species in Qatar, based on its calculated value of APTI in this study. Both total chlorophyll and ascorbic acid influence APTI levels and have a strong positive correlation with APTI. BCF values in leaves were higher than fruits indicating that the leaves of Ziziphus spina-christi have a greater potential for metal absorption than its fruits. Moreover, the leaves of Ziziphus spina-christi showed a potential for mercury accumulation (BCF > 1), thus it is a good candidate to be used for phytoremediation in areas of mercury contamination. The integration of both APTI and BCF methods is significant and beneficial in advising policymakers and urban planners regarding suitable tree species for sustainable urban development.

1. Introduction

The massive development of commercial, urban, and industrial activities and their combined emissions of air pollutants have made air quality a global environmental issue in the recent century [1]. Due to changes in physical developments like factories, buildings, and paved roads, green areas and open lands—which cool the city and improve air quality—have decreased [2]. Urbanization also boosted industrial and vehicular activity, worsening air quality [3]. Road traffic is a major source of urban air pollution [1,4]. Traffic-related emissions such as carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), methane (CH4), non-methane gases, sulfur oxides (SOx), and particulate matter (PMs) can impact climate change [2]. Road traffic also releases heavy metals (HMs) like chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), and mercury (Hg) from vehicle exhaust, tire wear, brake lining, and road surface. Air pollution in cities has several health impacts. Traffic-related air pollution’s health consequences are a key transport problem. The WHO Regional Office for Europe expects ambient air pollution to cause 100,000 deaths a year in Europe in future decades, decreasing life expectancy by a year [5]. Short-term and long-term air pollution exposure causes COPD, asthma, respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses, and mental and perinatal disorders in newborns and adults [6]. Qatar is one of the fastest-growing nations [7]. Qatar’s Planning and Statistics Authority (PSA) anticipated 1,964,978 automobiles in 2022 and 3 million people in March 2023. Increased air emissions will damage air quality and harm the ecosystem and humans. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are gaining popularity as effective techniques for reducing environmental pollution [3,8,9]. The European Commission defines NbS as “solutions that are inspired and supported by nature, which are cost-effective, simultaneously provide environmental, social, and economic benefits, and help build resilience” [10]. NbS is a cost-effective, sustainable, and effective way to monitor and mitigate urban air pollution [3,11]. Conventional solutions require continuous monitoring programs using fixed stations, which do not represent the area [12]. Urban vegetation is a cheap and easy way to monitor air quality across vast regions [13]. Air pollutants damage plants the most, especially leaves, which are the main receptors and environmental sinks. The Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) measures plants’ ability to tolerate air pollutants [12,14]. APTI helps classify plants as sensitive, intermediate, or resistant to air pollution [15,16]. Sensitive species with low APTI values are important early pollution indicators, while tolerant species with high APTI values are best for pollution mitigation. APTI uses four biochemical parameters—total chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, leaf extract pH, and relative water content—that are immediately impacted by air pollution and easy to quantify. Several studies evaluated the Air Pollution Tolerance Index of plant species along roadsides and in industrial, urban, and rural areas in India [14,15,17], China [18,19], Nepal [16], Saudi Arabia [20,21,22], Oman [23], and Iraq [24]. In addition, roadside plants may accumulate pollutants like HMs and be employed in phytoremediation. The bioconcentration factor (BCF) is one of the measures that can quantify a plant’s phytoremediation capacity [25]. Numerous scholars have conducted investigations on the accumulation of heavy metals in roadside vegetation [26,27,28,29,30]. To our knowledge, there are no studies conducted in Qatar to assess the use of plants in biomonitoring and mitigation of air pollution. Thus, this study examines, for the first time in Qatar, the use of Sidr trees (Ziziphus spina-christi), which are evergreen trees native to Qatar and commonly found along roadsides, gardens, and residential areas, as a nature-based solution for biomonitoring air quality and phytoremediation of heavy metals. Here, we aim to investigate the tolerance of this tree species and its potential accumulation of HMs. The Air Pollution Tolerance Index and heavy metal accumulation potential of Sidr trees (Ziziphus spina-christi) along the roadside of a highly urbanized and active area in Qatar and at a control site were examined. While there is existing research on the assessment of using plants for biomonitoring air quality based on APTI, we added the use of BCF (for both leaves and fruits of the tree) to enhance the assessment. In this research, for the first time in arid climate, we incorporated the usage of both APTI and BCF to evaluate Ziziphus spina-christi trees as a sustainable option for biomonitoring of urban air quality and a potential phytoremediation solution of heavy metal pollution. Combining both APTI and BCF measures is useful in recommending suitable tree species for sustainable urban development, which is significant for policymakers and urban planners.

2. Materials and Methodology

2.1. Study Area and Sampling Strategy

Two areas were selected for this study: The first is a rural area as a reference site located at the Northside of Qatar away from pollution sources (approximately 70 km from Doha). The second is a roadside area located near a high traffic density area, including universities, schools, and governmental institutions (Figure 1). In the summertime, temperatures can exceed 40 °C (104 °F) [31]. In August and September, relative humidity rises, making circumstances uncomfortable. The winter season has little erratic precipitation. Air pollution is often linked to traffic congestion, largely due to automobile emissions. This might increase PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, and VOCs [32]. Fully developed leaf and fruit samples were randomly collected in five independent replicates from Ziziphus spina-christi trees at the height of 1.5 to 2 m during March (temperature 16–40 °C, with an average of 25 °C) [33]. The collected samples were immediately transferred to polythene bags and stored in a freezer set at −20 °C, then transferred to the laboratory for analysis.

2.2. Biochemical Parameters

2.2.1. Ascorbic Acid

The ascorbic acid was determined following the method used by the University of Canterbury (2021) [34]. In essence, 0.5 g of fresh leaves were crushed and added to 10 mL of distilled water for extraction. The extract was then transferred to a 15 mL centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 4500 RPM for 15 min. The clear extract was then titrated with 0.005 M Iodine solution to determine the ascorbic acid concentration.

2.2.2. Total Chlorophyll Content (TChl)

The total chlorophyll content was determined following the method described in the literature by Alhesnawi et al. (2018) and Alotaibi et al. (2020) [21,24]. The method entails using 0.20 g of leaves crushed and extracted with 10 mL of 80% acetone. The resulting solution is then incubated for 15 min and centrifuged for 3 min (2500 RPM), and the absorbance read at 645 nm and 663 nm. The total chlorophyll content was calculated using the below formula.
T C h l   m g g = 20.2 × A 645 + 8.02 × A 663
where A645 and A663 are the absorbance at wavelengths of 645 nm and 663 nm.

2.2.3. pH of Leaf Extract

A sample of 0.5 g of leaves was ground, dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water, and filtered, and the pH was measured using a calibrated pH meter.

2.2.4. Relative Water Content (RWC)

The relative water content was determined following the method described by Alhesnawi et al. (2018) and Alotaibi et al. (2020) and calculated using the below formula [21,24].
R W C = F W D W T W D W × 100
where FW denotes fresh weight, DW denotes the dry weight, and TW denotes the turgid weight.

2.3. Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI)

The Air Pollution Tolerance Index was determined using the measured ascorbic acid, total chlorophyll concentration, pH, and relative water content. The APTI was calculated using the formula developed by Singh and Rao in 1983 [15].
A P T I = A T C h l + p H + R W C 10
where A is the ascorbic acid of leaf in mg/g (dry weight), TChl is the total chlorophyll of leaf in mg/g (dry weight), pH is the leaf-extract pH, and RWC is the relative water content of leaf tissue in percentage.
Based on APTI values, plants are categorized as sensitive, intermediate, moderately tolerant, and tolerant (Table 1).

2.4. Chemical Analysis of Metals

Dried and homogenized soil sample of approximately 0.25 ± 0.05 g was weighed and mixed with 9 mL of concentrated nitric acid and 3 mL hydrofluoric acid (Puriss, Honeywell, Muskegon, MI, USA) in a 50 mL PTFE tube before digestion using a microwave digestion system (MARS-6, C.E.M. Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA) according to US EPA (2007) [36]. For leaf and fruit samples, they were washed three times with Milli-Q ultra-pure water (IQ 7010, Merck, MA, USA) to remove the particulate matter (PM) deposited on the surface before being freeze-dried (SP VirTis AdVantage Pro, ATS, Sewickley, PA, USA) until a constant weight was reached. Then, approximately 0.5 ± 0.05 g of dried, ground, and homogenized sample powder was weighed in a 50 mL PTFE digestion tube, to which 5 mL of concentrated HNO3 and H2O2 were added [37]. The digestion was carried out using a microwave digestion system (MARS 6, C.E.M., NC, USA). The digested samples were then preserved with 3 mL of nitric acid and diluted up to 50 mL with reagent-grade water before being analyzed with ICP-OES (Optima 7300DV-Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and direct mercury analyzer (DMA-80 evo, Milestone Srl, Sorisole, Italy).

2.5. Quality Assurance and Control

The establishment of analytical quality assurance was achieved with the examination of reagent blanks and certified reference materials (CRM). Two certified reference materials (CRMs) were employed in this study. The first CRM utilized was NIST-2709a, which is specifically designed for San Joaquin soil. It had a certified value of 0.90 ± 0.20. Two reference materials were used in this study: (i) NIST 1566a, obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which is a standard reference material for oyster tissue and (ii) NIST 1573a, also obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which is a standard reference material for tomato leaves. The approved value of this substance is (0.034 ± 0.00). In order to ensure adequate quality, 10% of the total samples tested have been allocated as quality control (QC) samples. The analysis of all samples was conducted in triplicate, with an average weight of 0.25 ± 0.05 g. The recovery percentage obtained ranged from 89% to 102%.

2.6. Bioconcentration Factor (BCF)

The Bioconcentration Factor (BCF) of HMs in plant tissue (i.e., leaves and fruit) can be defined as the capability of plant tissues for element accumulation from the soil [38]. It can be measured by dividing the measured concentration of metals in the plant tissue by the metal concentration in the substrate [39].
B C F = C o n c e n t r a t i o n   o f   M e t a l   ( p l a n t   t i s s u e ) C o n c e n t r a t i o n   o f   M e t a l   ( s o i l )
BCF is used as an index to determine the ability of plants to accumulate HMs. Based on BCF, the plant can only absorb the metal without accumulation if BCF ≤ 1, while it can accumulate the metal if BCF > 1 [29,40]. Higher BCF values indicates that the plant has higher potential of phytoaccumulation [28].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

A One-way (ANOVA) test was performed to evaluate the mean variation between the sample groups. Pearson correlation (2-tailed) analysis at the 0.05 level was performed to reveal the relationships between five parameters (pH, Ascorbic Acid, TChl, RWC, and APTI). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed based on five parameters (pH, Ascorbic Acid, TChl, RWC, and APTI) of the Ziziphus spina-Christi. The extracted factors with initial eigenvalues < 1 and the varimax method were used for rotation with Kaiser normalization. The statistical data analysis was carried out with IBM-SPSS-25 and Minitab-17 software.

3. Results and Discussions

The APTI determination relies on various biochemical parameters: total chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, leaf pH, and relative water content [41,42]. Each contributes to the overall tree species categorization. The descriptive statistics of all biochemical parameters and APTI for all 12 sites (roadside areas and rural areas) are shown in Table 2. A One-way (ANOVA) test was performed to evaluate the mean variation between the sample groups. Significant variations (p < 0.05) were observed in all variables at 95% CI along roadsides in Qatar.

3.1. Ascorbic Acid

Ascorbic acid is a reductant and an antioxidant found in all plant growing parts [43,44]. It plays a significant role in photosynthetic carbon fixation; its role is correlated with its concentration [45]. Plants that retain high ascorbic acid levels even under contaminated habitats are thought to be air pollution resistant [46,47]. Numerous studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between raised levels of ascorbic acid and the ability of plant species to tolerate increased air pollution [17,48,49]. Furthermore, another research has hypothesized that the presence of traffic-induced stress leads to an observable elevation in the levels of ascorbic acid in plants [50]. Ascorbic acid helps uphold the plant cell stability in harsh conditions by scavenging cytotoxic free radicals [51,52]. In addition, it is a strong reducing agent in plants that triggers many defenses mechanisms [53]. In this study, all data from roadside samples displayed high ascorbic acid values that may indicate the species’ tolerance to air pollution within the sample zone and reference area. The ascorbic acid average value at roadside areas was higher (42.94 mg/g) than in rural areas (38.93 mg/g). The results obtained in our study is consistent with the data shown in Table 3 and Figure 2 of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) study [21]. However, the calculated ascorbic acid values are high compared to other values found in the literature (e.g., [54]) (Table 3, Figure 2), which may indicate variation in both the environment and the sampling areas’ climates.

3.2. Total Chlorophyll

Chlorophyll is a guide of productivity of the tree species [55]. This parameter shows the plant photosynthetic ability and thus its biomass growth. Reports indicate that chlorophyll content depends on the species kind, pollution levels, and other biotic and abiotic conditions; certain pollutants increase the chlorophyll content while others may reduce it [56]. The chlorophyll molecule can be degraded due to high quantity of pollutants in the atmosphere [17]. In this study, the total chlorophyll values ranged from 5.89 to 6.02 mg/g in rural areas and 1.94 to 4.87 mg/g in roadside areas, showing a reduction in chlorophyll at the roadside. Data from our results indicate the average highest chlorophyll content was observed in the reference site (as expected), 5.94 mg/g. These high values indicate low pollution within the area or may indicate that the plant has become tolerant to pollution [57,58]. Shyam et al. (2006) reported that elevated chlorophyll might also result from a reduced accumulation of dust particles on the surface of the leaves [59]. Samples collected from the roadside sampling area showed a significant reduction in the chlorophyll content of up to 69%. These results agree with previous data by Achakzai et al. (2017), who reported the decrease in total chlorophyll content with increased pollution [48]. Rahmawati et al. (2014) suggested that the air pollutant may affect the chemistry of the chlorophyll molecule [60], in which hydrogen atoms replace magnesium within the chemical matrix, reducing the efficiency of the chloroplast, photosynthesis, and the conductance of stomata and increasing leaf fall [61,62,63]. Others such as Bakiyaraj et al. (2014) reported that lower chlorophyll content was associated with a higher level of pollution [64]. Our data imply a high polluted site with low chlorophyll levels.

3.3. pH

Within plants, pH plays a significant role by regulating the function of the plant’s enzymes that are responsible for many of the chemical reactions that take place within plants. The activity of enzymes is affected by pH, and each enzyme has an optimal pH range at which it functions most efficiently, some requiring higher pH than others do [48]. Moreover, pH can also play more roles in metabolic reactions and disease resistance [65,66]. Acidic pollutants such as SO2 and NOx decrease the pH nature of the leaf and thus adversely affect the plant. Tolerance of the plant then governs the rate of pH drop. An increase in the pH increases the plant’s resistance to air pollutants attained by the chemical conversion of hexose sugar to ascorbic acid in the foliar tissue of plants [67]. Our results indicate that the pH in roadside areas was slightly higher than in rural areas. Our pH data are in agreement with similar studies conducted in the region [21] (Table 3, Figure 2).

3.4. Relative Water Content

The relative water content plays a vital role in the ability of plants to endure pollution as water regulates many physiological processes under high stress from contaminants [47]. The RWC gauges the water’s balance (uptake and release) [68,69]. This parameter governs the permeability of the outer non-aqueous surface layer of the protoplasm within the tree species [70] and thus accounts to some extent for the tolerance against pollutants [48]. As the air around the plant gets polluted, the plant’s cell permeability increases [71]. This, in turn, results in an increased loss of water and nutrients, triggering a domino effect leading to the immature senescence of leaves [72]. High water levels within a plant species can also counteract high acidity with its cells sap and control drought conditions [17]. Elevated values of RWC indicate drought resistance species, while reduced levels may be the result of pollutants affecting the rate of transpiration within the plant [73,74]. Moreover, Rai (2016) proposed a direct link between physiological functions and RWC in stressed conditions [75]. In this study, the RWC% mean value in rural areas was considerably higher than in roadside areas (92.18% vs. 78.82%). This is in agreement with previous studies from similar regions as both Alotaibi et al. (2020) and Alhesnawi et al. (2018) reported higher RWC% at rural areas in comparison to roadside areas (Table 3, Figure 2) [21,24].

3.5. APTI

The reaction of most plants to the stress bought on by different contaminants, whether this emanates from the water, soil, or air, depends on the species. The APTI is a significant tool that is used as a measure of the sensitivity of plants, which helps in the selection of pollution tolerant plants for mitigation purposes [17,47]. Plants with elevated APTI are a good choice and show tolerance to air pollution. In our study, the APTI range of roadside and rural areas was between 39.55–63.01 and 54.68–57.81, respectively. Based on our calculated values of APTI and the APTI categories by Singh et al. (1991) (Table 1), Ziziphus spina-christi is tolerant to air pollution in our study area [35]. The tolerance of Ziziphus spina-christi to air pollution was also found to be high (i.e., tolerant species) in Saudi Arabia [21] and Oman [23]. The same species (i.e., Ziziphus spina-christi) was reported to have intermediate tolerance to air pollution in Egypt [54] and Iraq [24]. Our data indicate that Ziziphus spina-christi is tolerant to air pollution within sampled sites in Qatar and is a good candidate for air pollution mitigation and can be used where air pollution is of particular concern such as in industrial areas, urban areas, and heavy traffic roadsides, which would result in lower air pollution loads. As stated earlier, depending on the climatic nature of the site, other studies may contradict our findings (e.g., [24,54]) with regards to the species. Nevertheless, there are no data concerning this species and subject in Qatar yet. Thus, it would be appropriate to conduct more studies on this species, including other native plant species compatible with Qatar climate, and investigate their utilization to mitigate air pollution and its effects.
The Air Pollution Tolerance Index combines the data of four biochemical parameters, ascorbic acid, total chlorophyll content, pH, and relative water content, to give a better understanding with regard to the response of plants to pollution [76,77]. A Pearson correlation analysis was performed between all biochemical parameters and APTI. APTI showed a strong positive correlation (p < 0.01) with both total chlorophyll (coefficients 0.83) and ascorbic acid (coefficient 0.76). In contrast, a weak correlation was observed between RWC, pH, and APTI (Table 4 and Figure 3). Alotaibi et al. (2020) reported a strong positive correlation of APTI with ascorbic acid, while it had weak correlation with the rest of the parameters [21]. A strong positive correlation between APTI and ascorbic acid was also reported by [24].
The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method was used to identify significant factors influencing APTI levels. Table 5 represents the correlation matrix between variables (total chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, pH, relative water content, and APTI). Eigenvalues of the principal components greater than or equal to one are classified as statistically significant. The percentage variance of components 1 and 2 was calculated using the PCA method. PC1 (total chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, and APTI) represented 45%, while PC2 (pH and RWC) indicated 27% with an approximate total cumulative of 73% (Figure 4). The results indicate that the cluster of two components (total chlorophyll and ascorbic acid with APTI) represented 45%. In contrast, PC2 (pH and RWC) indicated 27%, pointing to the former two as main parameters when determining the ATPI. The Pearson’s correlation also shows this as both total chlorophyll and ascorbic acid showed a strong positive correlation with APTI (Table 4, Figure 3). As shown in Figure 4, ascorbic acid and total chlorophyll are substantially correlated with APTI among the four biochemical parameters.

3.6. BCF

Bioconcentration factor is a vital measure to investigate a plant’s potential in the remediation of heavy metals [25]. The accumulation of Al, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Zn, and Hg by the Ziziphus spina-christi was assessed using BCF in the leaves and fruits as depicted in Figure 5. Generally, BCF values were higher in leaves than fruits implying that leaves of Ziziphus spina-christi have a greater potential for metal absorption than its fruits. The results showed that both the leaves and fruits of the studies plant species had BCF values < 1 for all the investigated elements except Hg where BCF > 1 in both leaves and fruits of Ziziphus spina-christi. The metal concentrations were obtained in the order of Hg > Zn > Cu >Ni > Pb > Mn > Cr > Cd > Co > Ba > Fe > Al in the leaves and Hg > Zn > Pb > Cu > Ni > Cd > Fe > Mn > Cr > Co > Ba > Al in the fruits. The highest BCF obtained was Hg 4.301 and 2.32 in leaves and fruits, respectively. These findings suggest that the leaves and fruits of Ziziphus spina-christi can accumulate Hg; however, they can absorb but not accumulate Al, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn. Our findings suggest that the native Ziziphus spina-christi has the ability to accumulate Hg and therefore is a good candidate to be used for phytoremediation in areas of mercury contamination. El-Amier and Alghanem (2018) estimated the BCF of four metals (Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb) in leaves of Ziziphus spina-christi from an urban area in Egypt [28]. The results obtained in their study align with our findings for the elements Zn, Cu, and Pb, since both studies observed BCF < 1. However, their study found a BCF of more than 1 for Cd, suggesting that the leaves of Ziziphus spina-christi have the ability to accumulate this particular element. Based on the values of BCF higher than 1 of Fe, Pb, and Cd in the leaves of Ziziphus spina-christi in an industrial area in Iran, Abbaszadeh-Dahaji et al. (2019) concluded that for phytoextraction of heavy metals in both urban and industrial areas, Ziziphus spina-christi can be considered as a suitable species [78]. Furthermore, Rafati et al. (2019) conducted a study to determine the BCF of four heavy metals (iron, manganese, lead, and cadmium) in the leaves of Ziziphus spina-christi in an industrial region of Iran. The findings of their research indicated that the BCF for cadmium exceeded 1, suggesting that this particular plant species has the potential to be utilized for phytoremediation purposes in regions affected by cadmium contamination [30].

4. Conclusions

In this study, Ziziphus spina-christi showed a different response to air pollution that alerts biochemical parameters of the tree. Our study revealed that the rural site was the least disturbed by anthropogenic activities based on high levels of both total chlorophyll and relative water content and low levels of ascorbic acid. APTI is a significant tool for future planning and can help efficiently in the selection of plants for biomonitoring of air quality in urban areas. Plants with higher APTI values are considered tolerant species. They can be used as a sink to different air pollutants, while those with lower APTI values are considered sensitive and valuable as bioindicators of air pollution. Based on the calculated APTI in our study, Ziziphus spina-christi is considered a tolerant species and therefore is recommended to be incorporated into the green belt design in Qatar to enhance the air pollution mitigation in the state. Additionally, based on our results, Ziziphus spina-christi leaves showed that they accumulate mercury and thus have great potential to be used for phytoremediation of mercury contamination. Further studies are suggested to investigate other plant species in Qatar (especially native plants) around different pollution sites (i.e., urban, industrial, and roadside) to help identify effective species for reducing pollutants or as bioindicators air pollution.

Author Contributions

N.A.-N., A.A.E., H.A.-S. and H.H. contributed to the study conception and design. Sample collection was conducted by N.A.-N., H.A.-S. and H.H. Lab analysis was performed by C.S., H.A.-S. and A.A.E. Statistical analysis of the data was performed by N.A.-N. and A.A.E. The map was produced by N.A.-N., and all figures were produced by A.A.E. and N.A.-N. The first draft was mainly written by N.A.-N. The review and edit of the draft was completed by N.A.-N., A.A.E., M.A.-A. and H.H. All authors contributed to revisions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data of this study are available from the corresponding author (N.A.-N.) upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the farm owner for providing his private farm sampling for research purposes and the Planning and Statistics Authority (PSA) in Qatar for providing the raw data used to create the study area map. The authors also greatly thank the Environmental Science Center for the support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. D’Amato, G.; Cecchi, L.; D’Amato, M.; Liccardi, G. Urban Air Pollution and Climate Change as Environmental Risk Factors of Respiratory Allergy: An Update. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 20, 95–102, quiz following 102. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Sukmaningrum, P.S.; Widiastuti, T.; Aprilianti, L.; Aprilianto, E.D.; Madyan, M. The Challenge and the Impact of Green Belt as an Air Pollution Control. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. 2020, 10, 463–471. [Google Scholar]
  3. Menon, J.S.; Sharma, R. Nature-Based Solutions for Co-Mitigation of Air Pollution and Urban Heat in Indian Cities. Front. Sustain. Cities 2021, 3, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jin, T.; Fu, L. Application of GIS to Modified Models of Vehicle Emission Dispersion. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 6326–6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Krzyzanowski, M.; Kuna-Dibbert, B.; Schneider, J. Health Effects of Transport-Related Air Pollution; WHO Regional Office Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005; ISBN 9289013737. [Google Scholar]
  6. Manisalidis, I.; Stavropoulou, E.; Stavropoulos, A.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al-Naimi, N.; Balakrishnan, P.; Goktepe, I. Measurement and Modelling of Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Emissions: A Marker for Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Doha, Qatar. Ann. GIS 2015, 21, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Biswal, B.K.; Bolan, N.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Balasubramanian, R. Nature-Based Systems (NbS) for Mitigation of Stormwater and Air Pollution in Urban Areas: A Review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 186, 106578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sowińska-Świerkosz, B.; García, J. What Are Nature-Based Solutions (NBS)? Setting Core Ideas for Concept Clarification. Nat.-Based Solut. 2022, 2, 100009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. European Commission. Nature-Based Solutions: EU-Funded Nbs Research Projects Tackle the Climate and Biodiversity Crisis. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/780fb633-49e4-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed on 27 August 2023).
  11. Wernecke, B.; Pool, J.-R. Are Nature-Based Solutions a Missing Link in Air Quality Management in South African Cities? Clean Air J. 2022, 32, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Molnár, V.É.; Simon, E.; Tóthmérész, B.; Ninsawat, S.; Szabó, S. Air Pollution Induced Vegetation Stress—The Air Pollution Tolerance Index as a Quick Tool for City Health Evaluation. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 113, 106234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mukherjee, A.; Agrawal, M. Pollution Response Score of Tree Species in Relation to Ambient Air Quality in an Urban Area. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 96, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jyothi, S.J.; Jaya, D.S. Evaluation of Air Pollution Tolerance Index of Selected Plant Species along Roadsides in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. J. Environ. Biol. 2010, 31, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Singh, S.K.; Rao, D.N. Evaluation of Plants for Their Tolerance to Air Pollution. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Air Pollution Control; IIT Delhi: Delhi, India, 1983; Volume 1, pp. 218–224. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shrestha, S.; Baral, B.; Dhital, N.B.; Yang, H.-H. Assessing Air Pollution Tolerance of Plant Species in Vegetation Traffic Barriers in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2021, 31, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kaur, M.; Nagpal, A.K. Evaluation of Air Pollution Tolerance Index and Anticipated Performance Index of Plants and Their Application in Development of Green Space along the Urban Areas. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 18881–18895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.J.; Ding, H. Variation in Air Pollution Tolerance Index of Plants near a Steel Factory: Implications for Landscape-Plant Species Selection for Industrial Areas. WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev. 2008, 4, 24–32. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Hao, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Chai, F.; Li, M. Air Pollution and Control Action in Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1519–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jabeen, R. Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) of Some Plants Growing on the Roads of Abha, Saudi Arabia. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2019, 12, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alotaibi, M.D.; Alharbi, B.H.; Al-Shamsi, M.A.; Alshahrani, T.S.; Al-Namazi, A.A.; Alharbi, S.F.; Alotaibi, F.S.; Qian, Y. Assessing the Response of Five Tree Species to Air Pollution in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia, for Potential Green Belt Application. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 29156–29170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Amin, S.A. The Tolerance Index for Different Growing Tree Plant Species in Jubail Industrial City, a Polluted Area, KSA. Biomed. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2021, 36, 28957–28965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al Maawali, R.; Sulaiman, H. Trees for Air Pollution Tolerance to Develop Green Belts as an Ecological Mitigation. Int. J. Environ. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 11, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alhesnawi, A.S.M.; Alsalman, I.M.; Najem, N.A. Evaluation of Air Pollution Tolerance Index of Some Plants Species in Kerbala City, Iraq. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2018, 10, 1386–1390. [Google Scholar]
  25. Usman, K.; Al-Ghouti, M.A.; Abu-Dieyeh, M.H. The Assessment of Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, and Nickel Tolerance and Bioaccumulation by Shrub Plant Tetraena Qataranse. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nabulo, G.; Oryem-Origa, H.; Diamond, M. Assessment of Lead, Cadmium, and Zinc Contamination of Roadside Soils, Surface Films, and Vegetables in Kampala City, Uganda. Environ. Res. 2006, 101, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shahid, M.; Dumat, C.; Khalid, S.; Schreck, E.; Xiong, T.; Niazi, N.K. Foliar Heavy Metal Uptake, Toxicity and Detoxification in Plants: A Comparison of Foliar and Root Metal Uptake. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 325, 36–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. El-Amier, Y.A.; Alghanem, S.M. Tree Leaves as Bioindicator of Heavy Metal Pollution from Soiland Ambient Air in Urban Environmental. Plant Arch. 2018, 18, 2559–2566. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sulaiman, F.R.; Hamzah, H.A. Heavy Metals Accumulation in Suburban Roadside Plants of a Tropical Area (Jengka, Malaysia). Ecol. Process. 2018, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rafati, M.; Mohammadi Roozbahani, M.; Pirmoradi, Z. Bioaccumulation of Some Heavy Metals by the Soil and Leaves of Ziziphus Spina-Christi in Khouzestan Oxin Steel Company. Iran. J. For. Range Prot. Res. 2019, 17, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
  31. Andric, I.; Kamal, A.; Al-Ghamdi, S.G. Efficiency of Green Roofs and Green Walls as Climate Change Mitigation Measures in Extremely Hot and Dry Climate: Case Study of Qatar. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 2476–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, K.; Batterman, S. Air Pollution and Health Risks Due to Vehicle Traffic. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 450–451, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Past Weather in Doha, Qatar—March 2021. Available online: https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/qatar/doha/historic?month=3&year=2021 (accessed on 27 August 2023).
  34. Determination of Vitamin C Concentration by Titration. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Available online: https://www.canterbury.ac.nz/media/documents/science-outreach/vitaminc_iodine.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2023).
  35. Singh, S.K.; Rao, D.N.; Agrawal, M.; Pandey, J.; Naryan, D. Air Pollution Tolerance Index of Plants. J. Environ. Manag. 1991, 32, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. US-EPA. U.S. EPA Method 3051A: Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Oils; US-EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
  37. US-EPA. SW-846 Test Method 3052: Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices; US-EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; Volume 20.
  38. Wu, Q.; Wang, S.; Thangavel, P.; Li, Q.; Zheng, H.; Bai, J.; Qiu, R. Phytostabilization Potential of Jatropha curcas L. in Polymetallic Acid Mine Tailings. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2011, 13, 788–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mishra, T.; Pandey, V.C. Phytoremediation of Red Mud Deposits Through Natural Succession. In Phytomanagement of Polluted Sites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 409–424. ISBN 9780128139134. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, W.-X.; Liu, J.-W.; Wu, M.-Z.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Li, S.-R. Accumulation and Translocation of Toxic Heavy Metals in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Growing in Agricultural Soil of Zhengzhou, China. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2009, 82, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Pandey, A.K.; Pandey, M.; Mishra, A.; Tiwary, S.M.; Tripathi, B.D. Air Pollution Tolerance Index and Anticipated Performance Index of Some Plant Species for Development of Urban Forest. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 866–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Joshi, P.C.; Swami, A. Air Pollution Induced Changes in the Photosynthetic Pigments of Selected Plant Species. J. Environ. Biol. 2009, 30, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Rai, R.; Agrawal, M.; Kumar Choudhary, K.; Agrawal, S.B.; Emberson, L.; Büker, P. Application of Ethylene Diurea (EDU) in Assessing the Response of a Tropical Soybean Cultivar to Ambient O3: Nitrogen Metabolism, Antioxidants, Reproductive Development and Yield. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 112, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khaleel, S.; Jaran, A.; Haddadin, M. Evaluation of Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Three Leaf Extracts of Ziziphus Spina-Christi (Sedr) Grown in Jordan. Br. J. Med. Med. Res. 2016, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seyyednejad, S.M.; Niknejad, M.; Koochak, H. A Review of Some Different Effects of Air Pollution on Plants. Res. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 5, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kuddus, M.; Kumari, R.; Ramteke, P.W. Studies on Air Pollution Tolerance of Selected Plants in Allahabad City, India. E3 J. Environ. Res. Manag. 2011, 2, 42–046. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nawaz, R.; Aslam, M.; Nasim, I.; Irshad, M.A.; Ahmad, S.; Latif, M.; Hussain, F. Air Pollution Tolerance Index and Heavy Metals Accumulation of Tree Species for Sustainable Environmental Management in Megacity of Lahore. Air 2022, 1, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Achakzai, K.; Khalid, S.; Adrees, M.; Bibi, A.; Ali, S.; Nawaz, R.; Rizwan, M. Air Pollution Tolerance Index of Plants around Brick Kilns in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 190, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sharma, B.; Bhardwaj, S.K.; Sharma, S.; Nautiyal, R.; Kaur, L.; Alam, N.M. Pollution Tolerance Assessment of Temperate Woody Vegetation Growing along the National Highway-5 in Himachal Pradesh, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Adamsab, M.P.; Kousar, H.; Shwetha, D.S.; Sirajuddin, M.H.; Ravichandran, M. APTI of Some Selected Plants in Shivamogga City, South Asia. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2011, 1, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aguiar-Silva, C.; Brandão, S.E.; Domingos, M.; Bulbovas, P. Antioxidant Responses of Atlantic Forest Native Tree Species as Indicators of Increasing Tolerance to Oxidative Stress When They Are Exposed to Air Pollutants and Seasonal Tropical Climate. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 63, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aghajanzadeh, T.; Hawkesford, M.J.; De Kok, L.J. Atmospheric H2S and SO2 as Sulfur Sources for Brassica Juncea and Brassica Rapa: Regulation of Sulfur Uptake and Assimilation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 124, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dadkhah-Aghdash, H.; Rasouli, M.; Rasouli, K.; Salimi, A. Detection of Urban Trees Sensitivity to Air Pollution Using Physiological and Biochemical Leaf Traits in Tehran, Iran. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 15398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zenna, F.; Taha, L.; Shahin, S. Evaluation of Some Japanese’s Garden Plant Species for Its Tolerance to Air Pollution b. Comparison of Different Species of the Family Grown in Different Parts of the Garden. Egypt. J. Agric. Res. 2019, 97, 727–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sumangala, H.P.; Aswath, C.; Laxman, R.H.; Namratha, M.R. Evaluation of Air Pollution Tolerance Index (ATPI) of Selected Ornamental Tree Species of Bengaluru, India. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 2018, 6, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Karmakar, D.; Padhy, P.K. Air Pollution Tolerance, Anticipated Performance, and Metal Accumulation Indices of Plant Species for Greenbelt Development in Urban Industrial Area. Chemosphere 2019, 237, 124522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Beg, M.U.; Farooq, M.; Bhargava, S.K.; Kidwai, M.M.; Lal, M.M. Performance of Trees around a Thermal Power Station. Environ. Ecol. 1990, 8, 791–797. [Google Scholar]
  58. Katiyar, V.; Dubey, P.S. Growth Behaviour of Two Cultivars of Maize in Response to SO2 and NO2. J. Environ. Biol. 2000, 21, 317–323. [Google Scholar]
  59. Shilpa, S.; Verma, H.N.; Bhargava, S.K. Air Pollution and Its Impacts on Plant Growth; New India Publishing Agency: New Delhi, India, 2006; ISBN 81-89422-10-3. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rahmawati, N.; Rosmayati, R.; Delvian, D.; Basyuni, M. Chlorophyll Content of Soybean As Affected By Foliar Application of Ascorbic Acid And Inoculation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi In Saline Soil. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2014, 3, 127–131. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tripathi, A.K.; Gautam, M. Biochemical Parameters of Plants as Indicators of Air Pollution. J. Environ. Biol. 2007, 28, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Bora, M.; Joshi, N. A Study on Variation in Biochemical Aspects of Different Tree Species with Tolerance and Performance Index. Bioscan 2014, 9, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  63. Giri, S.; Shrivastava, D.; Deshmukh, K.; Dubey, P. Effect of Air Pollution on Chlorophyll Content of Leaves. Curr. Agric. Res. J. 2013, 1, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bakiyaraj, R.; Ayyappan, D. Air Pollution Tolerance Index of Some Terrestrial Plants Around an Industrial Area. Int. J. Mod. Res. Rev. 2014, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lai, J.-Y.; Luo, L.-J.; Ma, D. Effect of Cross-Linking Density on the Structures and Properties of Carbodiimide-Treated Gelatin Matrices as Limbal Stem Cell Niches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Blainey, P.C. The Future Is Now: Single-Cell Genomics of Bacteria and Archaea. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rai, P.K.; Panda, L.L.S. Dust Capturing Potential and Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) of Some Road Side Tree Vegetation in Aizawl, Mizoram, India: An Indo-Burma Hot Spot Region. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2014, 7, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sen, D.N.; Bhandari, M. Ecological and Water Relation to Two Citrullus spp. Environ. Physiol. Ecol. Plants 1978, 1978, 203–228. [Google Scholar]
  69. Jones, H. Plants and Microclimate; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  70. Keller, T.; Schwager, H. Air Pollution and Ascorbic Acid. For. Pathol. 1977, 7, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Keller, T. The Electrical Conductivity of Norway Spruce Needle Diffusate as Affected by Air Pollutants. Tree Physiol. 1986, 1, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Masuch, G.; Kicinski, H.G.; Kettrup, A.; Boos, K.S. Single and Combined Effects of Continuous and Discontinuous O3 and SO2 Immission on Norway Spruce Needles: I. Histological and Cytological Changes. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1988, 32, 187–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Swami, A.; Bhatt, D.; Joshi, P.C. Effects of Automobile Pollution on Sal (Shorea robusta) and Rohini (Mallotus phillipinensis) at Asarori, Dehradun. Himal. J. Environ. Zool. 2004, 18, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  74. Joshi, P.C.; Swami, A. Physiological Responses of Some Tree Species under Roadside Automobile Pollution Stress around City of Haridwar, India. Environmentalist 2007, 27, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rai, P.K. Impacts of Particulate Matter Pollution on Plants: Implications for Environmental Biomonitoring. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 129, 120–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ogunkunle, C.O.; Suleiman, L.B.; Oyedeji, S.; Awotoye, O.O.; Fatoba, P.O. Assessing the Air Pollution Tolerance Index and Anticipated Performance Index of Some Tree Species for Biomonitoring Environmental Health. Agrofor. Syst. 2015, 89, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nadgórska–Socha, A.; Kandziora-Ciupa, M.; Trzęsicki, M.; Barczyk, G. Air Pollution Tolerance Index and Heavy Metal Bioaccumulation in Selected Plant Species from Urban Biotopes. Chemosphere 2017, 183, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Abbaszadeh-Dahaji, P.; Baniasad-Asgari, A.; Hamidpour, M. The Effect of Cu-Resistant Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and EDTA on Phytoremediation Efficiency of Plants in a Cu-Contaminated Soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 31822–31833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographic position of study sites in Qatar. Maps show different land uses in the selected study sites.
Figure 1. Geographic position of study sites in Qatar. Maps show different land uses in the selected study sites.
Sustainability 15 13590 g001
Figure 2. Comparison plot of biochemical parameters and APTI of Ziziphus spina-christi from the literature. Y-axis on the left side of the graph represents the range of ascorbic acid (A) (mg/g), total chlorophyll (T-Chl) (mg/g), pH, relative water content (RWC) (%), and Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI). NA means Not Available.
Figure 2. Comparison plot of biochemical parameters and APTI of Ziziphus spina-christi from the literature. Y-axis on the left side of the graph represents the range of ascorbic acid (A) (mg/g), total chlorophyll (T-Chl) (mg/g), pH, relative water content (RWC) (%), and Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI). NA means Not Available.
Sustainability 15 13590 g002
Figure 3. Correlation of biochemical parameters with APTI values. (A) Total chlorophyll (mg/g) vs. APTI. (B) pH vs. APTI. (C) Ascorbic acid (mg/g) vs. APTI. (D) Relative water content (%) vs. APTI.
Figure 3. Correlation of biochemical parameters with APTI values. (A) Total chlorophyll (mg/g) vs. APTI. (B) pH vs. APTI. (C) Ascorbic acid (mg/g) vs. APTI. (D) Relative water content (%) vs. APTI.
Sustainability 15 13590 g003
Figure 4. Two-dimensional component analysis for APTI, total chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, pH, and RWC.
Figure 4. Two-dimensional component analysis for APTI, total chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, pH, and RWC.
Sustainability 15 13590 g004
Figure 5. BCF of twelve elements in leaves and fruits of Ziziphus spina-christi.
Figure 5. BCF of twelve elements in leaves and fruits of Ziziphus spina-christi.
Sustainability 15 13590 g005
Table 1. Plants categories based on APTI values adapted from (Singh et al. (1991)) [35].
Table 1. Plants categories based on APTI values adapted from (Singh et al. (1991)) [35].
APTIResponse
≤14Sensitive
15–19Intermediate
20–24Moderately tolerant
>24Tolerant
Table 2. Summarized descriptive analysis for ascorbic acid, mg/g (dry weight), total chlorophyll, mg/g (dry weight), pH, relative water content (%), and APTI.
Table 2. Summarized descriptive analysis for ascorbic acid, mg/g (dry weight), total chlorophyll, mg/g (dry weight), pH, relative water content (%), and APTI.
Site
Rural Area
(Reference Site)
Roadside Area
Ascorbic Acid, mg/g (dry weight)Mean ± Std38.93 ± 0.9042.94 ± 4.73
Range37.70–40.2334.98–54.70
Total Chlorophyll, mg/g (dry weight)Mean ± Std5.94 ± 0.063.32 ± 1.00
Range5.89–6.021.94–4.87
pHMean ± Std6.15 ± 0.016.17 ± 0.08
Range6.15–6.166.05–6.36
Relative Water Content, %Mean ± Std92.18 ± 1.9178.82 ± 4.41
Range89.09–94.1371.83–90.24
APTIMean ± Std56.29 ± 1.1348.88 ± 7.80
Range54.68–57.8139.55–63.01
Table 3. Comparison of APTI and biochemical parameters of Ziziphus spina-christi from the literature.
Table 3. Comparison of APTI and biochemical parameters of Ziziphus spina-christi from the literature.
CountrySiteAscorbic Acid
(mg/g)
Total Chlorophyll
(mg/g)
pHRelative Water Content
(%)
APTIReference
KSAReference/rural35.301.085.5289.1032.20[21]
KSARoadside site78.600.695.5572.0056.20[21]
EgyptRoadside30.110.326.4090.4029.26[54]
OmanRoadside5.522.357.0775.3912.74[23]
IraqReference/rural5.871.506.9076.8612.62[24]
IraqRoadside6.161.276.3070.3311.68[24]
QatarReference/rural38.935.946.1592.1856.29This study
QatarRoadside42.943.326.1778.8248.88This study
Table 4. Pearson correlations (2-tailed) between variables at 95% CI. (* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed), ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)).
Table 4. Pearson correlations (2-tailed) between variables at 95% CI. (* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed), ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)).
pHAscorbic AcidTotal ChlorophyllRWCAPTI
pH1
Ascorbic Acid0.051
Total Chlorophyll0.0630.27 *1
RWC−0.21−0.33 *0.30 *1
APTI0.080.76 **0.83 **0.041
Table 5. Eigenvalues and total variance of the Principal Component Analysis.
Table 5. Eigenvalues and total variance of the Principal Component Analysis.
ComponentInitial EigenvaluesVariablesRotated Component Matrix
Total% of VarianceCumulative %PC1PC2
12.27945.58945.589APTI0.994−0.102
21.39927.97973.568TChl0.8710.288
30.95018.99792.565Ascorbic Acid0.700−0.537
40.3717.41799.983RWC0.1390.900
50.0010.017100.000pH0.061−0.477
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Naimi, N.; Abou Elezz, A.; Al-Adba, M.; Al-Saadi, H.; Sorino, C.; Hassan, H. Assessing the Use of Ziziphus spina-christi as a Sustainable Solution for Biomonitoring of Urban Air Quality: A Case Study from Qatar. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813590

AMA Style

Al-Naimi N, Abou Elezz A, Al-Adba M, Al-Saadi H, Sorino C, Hassan H. Assessing the Use of Ziziphus spina-christi as a Sustainable Solution for Biomonitoring of Urban Air Quality: A Case Study from Qatar. Sustainability. 2023; 15(18):13590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Naimi, Noora, Ahmed Abou Elezz, Maryam Al-Adba, Hamood Al-Saadi, Caesar Sorino, and Hassan Hassan. 2023. "Assessing the Use of Ziziphus spina-christi as a Sustainable Solution for Biomonitoring of Urban Air Quality: A Case Study from Qatar" Sustainability 15, no. 18: 13590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop