Next Article in Journal
Study of Pedestrian Zone According to Superblock Criteria in the Casco Antiguo of Panama
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of the Combined Effect of Fibers and Nano Materials on the Technical Performance of Mortar and Concrete
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation and Characterization of Three New Crude Oil Degrading Yeast Strains, Candida parapsilosis SK1, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa SK2 and SK3

1
Laboratory of Biotechnology, Conservation and Valorisation of Naturals Resources (LBCVNR), Faculty of Sciences Dhar El Mehraz, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah, BP 1796 Atlas, Fez 30000, Morocco
2
School of Engineering BIOMEDTECH, Euro-Mediterranean University of Fez, Rond-Point Bensouda, Route de Meknes BP 51, Fez 30070, Morocco
3
Laboratory of Functional Ecology and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Imouzzer Street, P.O. Box 2202, Fez 30000, Morocco
4
Department of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
5
Biology Department, College of Science, Jouf University, P.O. Box 2014, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(6), 3465; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063465
Submission received: 5 February 2022 / Revised: 24 February 2022 / Accepted: 10 March 2022 / Published: 16 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Soil Conservation and Sustainability)

Abstract

:
Bioremediation using yeasts is an alternative way to minimize the effects of oil spillage on soil. This paper aims to establish a bioremediation protocol involving the optimization of physicochemical parameters. In this regard, three new yeast strains, SK1, SK2 and SK3, were isolated from hydrocarbon-contaminated samples from the Fez-Meknes region, Morocco. These isolates were identified as new species of Candida parapsilosis (SK1) and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (SK2 and SK3), respectively, based on the similarity of their ITS region. The kinetic analysis of the process of degradation of petroleum oils are highlighted. These analyses were based on the degradation kinetics, and biomass formation using gravimetric analysis and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry techniques. The strains were able to degrade 68% of the total petroleum hydrocarbon in 21 days, as the sole carbon source. The addition of glucose increased the rate at which crude oil was consumed by the isolates. Our results suggest that inoculants based on Candida parapsilosis (SK1) and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (SK2 and SK3) cells have potential application in the biodegradation of crude oil and possibly in the degradation of other related aromatic compounds.

1. Introduction

Soil and water pollution by oil and its derivatives is now a serious and widespread ecological hazard. The world’s use of petroleum and its derivatives, and their transportation, has made them major contaminants in prevalence and quantity in the environment. The impact of an oil spill can be easily understood by the fact that one barrel of crude oil can make 1 million barrels of water undrinkable [1].
Soil and water contamination by hydrocarbons causes a significant damage to life in the environment, as the accumulation of pollutants in animal and plant tissues can lead to death or mutations [2].
Agricultural soils in the Fez-Meknes region of Morocco are subject to contamination by various organic pollutants, including hydrocarbon discharges from storage tank spills. This pollution has an impact on all health, economic and environmental aspects.
Biodegradation is an alternative that has been widely used to reduce hydrocarbon pollutants in the environment by spreading microorganisms hosting specialized degradative machinery. It is also accepted worldwide as an in situ, self-propelled, and eco-friendly treatment that leads to complete mineralization at a low cost. [3]
The main microorganisms degrading hydrocarbons in polluted areas are bacteria, yeasts and fungi [4,5]. Walker et al., reported that yeasts are better degraders of crude oil than bacteria [6]. In addition, according to Obuekwe et al., Ashraf and Ali, yeasts can utilize n-alkanes as a unique source of carbon and energy [7,8]. Several yeast species, such as Candida lipolytica and Geotrichum sp., Trichosporon mucoides and Yorrowia lipolytica, isolated from contaminated water, were reported to degrade petroleum compounds [9,10].
Recently, Benmessaoud et al. conducted a study on the biotypology and diversity of soil yeasts in this region, which is a good indicator to assess the extent of ecosystem disturbance by oil pollution. [11]. However, this needs to be explored more in the process of biodegradation of different hydrocarbons. In this sense, and in order to enrich and deepen the knowledge of biodegradation of soil yeasts, especially those contaminated by organic pollutants, a study was initiated by the laboratory of Biotechnology, Conservation and Valorization of Natural Resources in Fez, Morocco.
The objectives of this work were to: (i) isolate a number of cultivable aerobic hydrocarbon degrading yeasts from hydrocarbon contaminated sites in the Fez-Meknes region of Morocco; (ii) identify the isolates at the species level using molecular techniques; (iii) evaluate the biodegradation capacity of the selected yeast strains and assess the influence of any physico-chemical parameters on biodegradation to obtain a better understanding of bioremediation problems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Isolation of Yeast Candidates

From an environmental point of view, the yeasts used in this study were directly isolated from soils polluted by hydrocarbons. These soils contain an abnormal concentration of hydrocarbon substances that are potentially dangerous for human life as well as for fauna and flora.
Soil samples were taken from different locations in the Fez-Meknes region between the periods of December 2015 and April 2016. Twelve stations were selected; their locations and coordinates are shown in Table 1.
Around 100 g of soil was sampled, put into a sterile plastic bag and transported to the laboratory and kept cold (4 ± 0.1 °C). A total of 1 g of sample soil transferred into 10 mL of sterile distilled water and stirred for 10 min. A total of 1 mL of suspension was used to inoculate malt–yeast–glucose–peptone agar (yeast extract (3 g); malt extract (3 g), peptone (5 g), glucose (10 g); agar (15 g), H2O distillate 1 L), supplemented with chloramphenicol (200 mg/L), and incubated at 30 ± 0.1 °C for up to 72 h. The yeast-like colonies were isolated for additional purification [12].
The yeast strains were cultivated in 150 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 mL of mineral basal medium (MM), containing, per liter, 3.4 g K2HPO4, 4.3 g KH2PO4, 0.3 g MgCl2⋅2H2O and 1 g (NH4)2SO4, and supplemented with 1 mL of a solution of trace elements contained in 1 L (without complexing agents): HCl, 25%, 10 mL; FeCl2 4H2O, 1.5 g; CoCl2⋅6HaO, 190 mg; MnCl2 4H2O, 100 mg; ZnCl2, 70 mg; H3BO3, 62 mg; Na2MoO4 2H2O, 36 mg; NiCl2⋅6H2O, 24 mg; CuCl2 2H2O, 17 mg [13].
Two types of degradation mechanism were tested: gratuitous biodegradation using crude oil as the only carbon source, and cometabolism, using a second carbon source (glucose), easily assimilated by the three yeast strains.
A concentration of 3.74% (w/v) of the crude oil “Arabia Length (AL)” was added to the MM medium as a carbon source. The flasks were inoculated with 100 µL cultures pre-grown in MM medium plus 1 g/L of glucose. After this, they were incubated 30 ± 0.1 °C in a dry shaker at 100 rpm for one week.
The experiment was repeated three times for each isolat in order to estimate the error values.

2.2. Biodegradation Ability and Biomass Formation

The biodegradation assay for Petroleum compounds and derivatives as carbon sources was carried out in Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of the Bushnell Has Medium (KH2PO4 (1 g), K2HPO4 (1 g), NH4NO3 (1 g), MgSO4 7H2O (0.2 g), FeCl3 (0.05 g), CaCl2 2H2O (0.02 g), H2O distillate 1 L) [14]. Experiments were carried out in triplicate, under shaking (100 rpm), and at 28 ± 2 °C, for 21 days. A total of 100 μL of the preculture was used for each selected yeast strain and 3.74% (w/v) hydrocarbons were used as the sole carbon source. Several hydrocarbon substrates were used to evaluate the biodegradation potential of the selected strains (crude oil, Undecane, Hexadecane, diesel, Gasoline, Naphthalene, Toluene and Pyruvic acid). Two control flasks were also maintained for each series.
Biomass concentration was measured using a spectrophotometer at λ600nm (JENWAY 6300/UV-visible), based on the predetermined correlation between optical density and dry weight of biomass. These measurements were carried out 0, 4, 15 and 21 days, respectively.

2.3. Extraction of Residual Crude Oil

To quantify the degradation of n-alkanes present in crude oil by the selected yeasts, the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) was determined by the gravimetric weight loss technique.
Cell-free supernatants of the culture media containing petroleum oil or derivatives were extracted three times using 10 mL of dichloromethane and dried with anhydrous sodium sulphate [15].
The dichloromethane was evaporated by simple distillation at 60 °C, the amount of residual TPH was determined using a standard method for oil gravimetric. The controls were treated under the same conditions.
Biodegradation degree was calculated as:
( X 0 X t ) X 0 100   ( % )
where X0 is the initial amount of hydrocarbon and Xt is the remaining hydrocarbons after biodegradation [16,17]. The prepared samples then extracted and prepared for GC/MS analyses.

2.4. Hydrocarbon Analysis

The quantitative analysis of the hydrocarbons biodegradation by yeasts was based on GC/MS according to the method described by Gargouri et al. [17,18,19]. A total of 1 µL of the alkane fraction was analyzed by gas chromatography analysis GC/MS (trace GC 1300 TSQ 8000 evo) using aHP- 5 MS chromatographic column (5% phenyl Methyl Siloxane) of size 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm. The temperature was programmed to vary linearly from 70 °C to 230 °C at the rate of 20 °C min−1, then from 230 °C to 300 °C at 40 °C min−1 and 10 min at 300 °C. The helium was the carrier gas.

2.5. Identification and Phylogenetic Affiliation of the Yeast Strains

The selected yeasts were identified by their macroscopic, microscopic and physiological characteristics [12,20,21]. Potential isolates SK1, SK2 and SK3 were identified using molecular techniques by extracting genomic DNA and sequencing of ITS region as per Masneuf-Pomar‘ede et al. [22] and White et al. [23]. The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) primers (forward ITS 1-5′ TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G 3′ and reverse ITS 4- 5′ TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC 3′), which amplify a fragment of approximately 580 bp containing ITS1, 5.8 S and ITS 4 region, were used for this purpose. The amplification reaction was performed using a DNA thermal cycler™ Veriti™ in a 50 µL reaction mixture containing 5x GoTaq reaction buffer (Promega), 0.25 mM each dNTP, 0.2 µM each primer, 50 ng DNA template, and 2.5 U GoTaq DNA polymerase.
The Polymerase Chain Reaction program was executed with the following instructions: After an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, amplification was carried out through 30 cycles, each consisting of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 minute, annealing at 56 °C for 45 s, an extension step at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.
Preliminary identifications were made on the assembly of basis sequence and by searching the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. Strains were assigned to a particular genus when sequence similarity to a strain type was at least 98%, and to a given species when sequence similarity was at least at least 99.5%.
The related sequences were aligned using Clustal W under MEGA X software. The aligned ITS- DNA gene sequences were used to construct a phylogenetic tree using the Neighbour-Joining (NJ) Method, and yeast species were identified based on the phylogenetic analysis results [24,25].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out by ANOVA combination of the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene test using software R package version 3.3.1 [26]. The purpose of the Tukey test is to refine the analysis, and specify which groups are statistically different.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Yeasts

Based on the principal characteristics of potential isolates, the strains of SK1, SK2 and SK3 belong to genera Candida and Rhodotorula (Table 2).
Molecular identification of those isolates was based on ITS sequencing. According to sequence similarities and multiple alignments, the following isolates were identified: SK1 Candida parapsilosis (99%), SK2 Rhodotorula sp. Isolate (99%) also shared similarities with Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (100%), and SK3 Rhodotorula dairenensis (82.42%) shared similarities with Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (82.42%). The phylogenetic relationships between the sequence of the ITS-region of the yeast strains are shown in (Figure 1).
The phylogenetic relationship between strains was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model [25,27]. The selected tree represents a consensus topology between the different reconstructions. The 16 S rRNA gene sequences of strains used in this study were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database and are available under the following accession numbers: MZ148416-MZ148418, for Candida parapsilosis strain SK1, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa strain SK2, and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa strain SK3, respectively.

3.2. Screening of Yeast Isolates for Oil Degradation

The aim of this test is to select the most efficient strains regarding their capacity to degrade crude oil. Among the 36 tested strains, only three yeasts, namely, SK1, SK2 and SK3, were selected as candidates in this study, which showed an important turbidity in the cultures between interactions as a sign of growth (Figure 2). Subsequently, these three strains were grown separately and mixed in equal proportions for further analysis, which consisted of quantifying their biodegradation rates.
To characterize the biodegradation abilities of the yeast against the crude oil, the amount of biodegraded substrate was measured using the gravimetric weight-loss technique. This technique requires very careful precision. The use of abiotic flasks must not be overlooked to quantify the losses related to substrate leakage; particularly, to ensure that the yeast uses the carbon source that is put into culture. This will make it possible to validate the results obtained for the calculation of the degradation rate and the mineralization yield by considering the values of the residual hydrocarbon concentrations.
The results show that, after each incubation period of 4, 15 and 21 days at 30 °C in Bushnell Has medium containing 3.74% crude oil, and under a shaking of 100 rpm, the three tested strains have a crude oil biodegradation potential that increases with incubation time and exceeds 60%. In addition, the degradation of crude oil is estimated at 68 ± 0.9% for SK1, 68 ± 1.23% for SK2, SK3 68 ± 1.18% (Figure 3). Moreover, the best degradation rates for 4 and 15 days are observed in strain SK2 with a rate of 15.87 ± 0.1% and 56.04 ± 0.07%, respectively. The addition of glucose as the second carbon source allowed for the removal of about 78.6%, 89.6% and 78.7% of total petroleum hydrocarbon for SK1, SK2 and SK3, respectively (Figure 4).

3.3. Biomasses

The three best-performing isolated yeast strains, SK1, SK2 and SK3, were tested individually against some short-chain alkanes such as undecane and gasoline, long-chain n-alkanes such as hexadodecane, and aromatic hydrocarbons and other hydrocarbon substrates (toluene, naphthalene, diesel, pyruvic acid and crude oil).
In the presence of these different hydrocarbons, the optical density changed as a function of time for each isolate (Figure 5). The turbidity of the culture was estimated by measuring the growth in the strains at regular intervals (0, 4, 15 and 21 days) using a spectrophotometer (UV-visible type JENWAY 6300) at 600 nm. This reflects the degradation potential of the selected hydrocarbons by the selected yeasts.
The follow-up of the growth kinetics, in the presence of aromatic hydrocarbons for the strains, showed a weak growth throughout the incubation time.
The growth in these yeasts in the other types of hydrocarbons was linear between time 0 and day 15 of incubation, which means that these strains use xenobiotics as a source of energy for their growth (oxidation). After 15 days of incubation, the growth was limited, because, in this period, the chemical compound was not used for yeast growth but was degraded due to metabolic activity (co-metabolism).
The results show that SK1, SK2 and SK3 have a greater capacity to degrade crude oil and hexadecane.
In addition to their ability to grow on crude oil and hexadecane as the only carbon source, the strains can also grow on some refinery by-products, such as undecane, diesel fuel, gasoline and naphthalene (Figure 5). Hexadecane and crude oil were the best substrates to support the growth in the yeast strains.
The growth intensity is variable depending on the strain; the SK2 strain shows a strong cloudiness in the culture medium compared to the other strains.
However, the growth in strain SK3 in the presence of crude oil showed an extended degradation time.

3.4. Gas Chromatographic Analysis

The degradation of the crude oil by Candida and Rhodotorula species was analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The analysis revealed that the crude oil exhibited a distribution of n-alkanes between C7 and C28 (Figure 6). The proportion of hydrocarbons in the mixture was highly variable and ranged from 97% in the lighter oils to 50% in the heavier oils.
The crude oil degradation capacity of the isolates was evaluated by comparing the peaks in the chromatogram of the control to that of the samples. Candida parapsilosis and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa represented the efficient utilization of the n-alkane fraction compared to the untreated control.
GC/MS analysis revealed that suspension cells were capable of degrading aliphatic fractions, showing that all detectable hydrocarbon peaks were fully or partially utilized within 21 days by the yeast isolates. All three strains could degrade C7 to C28 components. They were able to reduce the relative abundance of toluene to 0.4%. The strains were completely used in the C8–C11 range. Rhodotorula mucilaginosa showed the complete degradation of the components phenol, hexadecane and ar-tumerone. In contrast, SK3 showed a nominal phenol degradation at 18%. However, Candida parapsilosis completely degraded components C16–C28 (Table 3).

4. Discussion

The increased diversity of yeast can degrade several types of organic pollutants that exist at ground level (biodegradation). There is interest in the degradation of hydrocarbons and their intermediates as new sources of carbon in the soil. Yeast feed on hydrocarbons and transform them into water and CO2. The yeasts are isolated from environments polluted with petroleum hydrocarbons because they are the best at degrading these pollutants [28,29].
In the present study, some crude-oil-degrading yeasts were isolated from Morocco. Among these isolates, three strains were identified as Candida parapsilosis (SK1), Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (SK2) and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (SK3). The property of these natural isolates in a petroleum-oil-contaminated area, motivated an investigation into the potentiality of those isolates to be used for petroleum biodegradation. Many investigators have reported the involvement of bacteria and yeast in crude oil biodegradation [30,31]. On the contrary, there is scant information that yeasts are better hydrocarbon-degraders than bacteria [17,32].
It is important to remember that the three selected strains showed strong biodegradation because they are already adapted to this type of product. In this present work, the SK1, SK2 and SK3 strains were able to degrade 68% of the total petroleum hydrocarbon in 21 days as the only source of carbon.
The hydrocarbons are transformed according to a chain oxidation reaction, which is carried out by the successive degradation of a more complex molecule until simple by-products are obtained, which are represented by H2O and CO2, with renewal of the biomass [33].
Several investigations have used the co-metabolism as an effective biodegradation mechanism in media that contain a substrate, which can induce the metabolic pathway.
Moreover, the presence of an easily assimilable substrate (co-metabolisme) such as glycose may allow for an organism to degrade a recalcitrant compound by providing the energy or reducing the necessary enzyme activity [34,35]. Due to the variability in the hydrocarbon composition of crude oil, microorganisms develop several adaptive mechanisms to utilize a wide range of hydrocarbons as substrates. It has been shown that they are able to produce enzymes that are adapted to degrade hydrocarbons.
For example, a rapidly metabolizable carbon source such as glutamate increases pentochlorophenol’s biodegradation rate by Flavobacterium sp, and the glucose increases the phenol’s biodegradation rate by Aureobasidium pullulans [36,37,38]. In this case, the involved substances are considered primary growth sources, since they are directly involved in yeast growth.
In our studies, for three yeast strains, we noticed that the maximal increase in biodegradation is correlated by adding glucose as an easily assimilable substrate and as the second carbon source. This allowed Candida parapsilosis and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa to efficiently remove petroleum hydrocarbon by about 78.6%, 89.6% and 78.7% respectively.
Statistical tests show that the biodegradation of crude oil supplemented with glucose by the SK2 strain was statistically significant and different from the other two strains. According to Kumar (2022), yeasts did not metabolize xenobiotic compounds as the only source of carbon and energy; they required a second source of carbon for the degradation of pollutants. The growth properties of the tested yeast strains were correlated with the carbon source that was used [39].
The investigated yeasts showed an impressive ability to degrade most of the tested compounds but showed a distinctive preference for hexadecane. Besides their capacity to grow on hexadecane, the three yeasts showed adequate potential to grow on some refinery subproducts, such as crude oil, diesel fuel and Undecane. Measurement of these isolates’ biomass using hexadecane, undecane, diesel oil, and crude oil as substrates showed that the yeasts were able of utilizing a wide range of intermediate carbon chain length n-alkanes, probably because of the less toxic nature of the long-chain n-alkanes [40].
The analysis of gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC/MS) shows that the strains assimilate the alkane fraction compared to the untreated control. The complete or partial use of hydrocarbon peaks reveals that these three yeast isolates could degrade the aliphatic fractions in 21 days. The n-alkanes differ in the attack by the isolates and could be ranked based on the availability of these hydrocarbons to these yeasts for mineralization. R. mucilaginosa also showed a considerable utilization of components from an aromatic fraction as a sole source of carbon and energy. While C. parapsilosis could not completely degrade aromatic hydrocarbons as the sole carbon source. This is due to the presence of a high enzymatic capacity, which allows these strains to degrade complex hydrocarbons.
According to Omar and Rehm, Candida parapsilosis effectively degraded n-alkanes and the highest degree of degradation of the alkane mixture (C12–C18) was achieved by cells immobilized on granular clay [41]. This result is in agreement with other research, where hydrocarbon-degrading microbes showed the preferential degradation of n-alkanes > branched alkanes > low-molecular-weight aromatics > cyclic alkanes > high-molecular-weight aromatics > asphaltene fractions.
After all, the results obtained in the laboratory must be adapted to the natural environment. Therefore, we should examine the behaviour of these strains in mesocosm experiments to clarify this way of acting in the natural environment for the bioremediation of soils and wastewater that are polluted by hydrocarbons.

5. Conclusions

In our study, we isolated and characterizated three new crude-oil-degrading yeast strains, Candida parapsilosis SK1, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa SK2 and SK3, which developed coping mechanisms to survive in the hostile environments of these soils. These yeasts will be used to establish a bioremediation protocol, involving the optimization of physico-chemical parameters, for the bioremediation of environments contaminated by hydrocarbons.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B. and M.K.; methodology, S.B.; software, J.A.; validation, S.B., J.A., A.A. and M.K.; formal analysis, J.A.; investigation, A.A.; data curation, J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, S.B., R.U., S.E., A.A.A.-H., M.O.G. and A.A.; visualization, J.B.; supervision, J.B., R.U., S.E., A.A.A.-H. and M.O.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R93), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All related data are within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R93), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ercoli, L.; Lulli, L.; Mariotti, M.; Masoni, A.; Arduini, I. Post-Anthesis Dry Matter and Nitrogen Dynamics in Durum Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen Supply and Soil Water Availability. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 28, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alvarez, P.J.J.; Anid, P.J.; Vogel, T.M. Kinetics of Aerobic Biodegradation of Benzene and Toluene in Sandy Aquifer Material. Biodegradation 1991, 2, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Berry, C.J.; Story, S.; Altman, D.J.; Upchurch, R.; Whitman, W.; Singleton, D.; Plaza, G.; Brigmon, R.L. Biological Treatment of Petroleum in Radiologically Contaminated Soil. In Remediation of Hazardous Waste in the Subsurface; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2006; Volume 940, pp. 87–103. ISBN 978-0-8412-3969-2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, G.; Lan, T.; Yang, G.; Li, J. Contamination, Spatial Distribution, and Source Contribution of Persistent Organic Pollutants in the Soil of Guiyang City, China: A Case Study. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kanaly, R.A.; Harayama, S. Biodegradation of High-Molecular-Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Farag, S.; Soliman, N.A. Biodegradation of Crude Petroleum Oil and Environmental Pollutants by Candida Tropicalis Strain. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2011, 54, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wasim, M.; Shoaib, S.; Mujawar, M.I.; Asiri, A.M. Factors Influencing Corrosion of Metal Pipes in Soils. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 861–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. AL-Saleh, E.S.; Obuekwe, C. Inhibition of Hydrocarbon Bioremediation by Lead in a Crude Oil-Contaminated Soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2005, 56, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Beopoulos, A.; Desfougeres, T.; Sabirova, J.; Zinjarde, S.; Neuvéglise, C.; Nicaud, J.-M. The Hydrocarbon-Degrading Oleaginous Yeast Yarrowia Lipolytica. In Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology; Timmis, K.N., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010; pp. 2111–2121. ISBN 978-3-540-77587-4. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chaillan, F.; Le Flèche, A.; Bury, E.; Phantavong, Y.-H.; Grimont, P.; Saliot, A.; Oudot, J. Identification and Biodegradation Potential of Tropical Aerobic Hydrocarbon-Degrading Microorganisms. Res. Microbiol. 2004, 155, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Benmessaoud, S.; Kara, M.; El asm, H.; Assouguem, A.; Bahhou, J. Biotypology of Yeast in Soils Polluted by Hydrocarbons in Fez-Meknes Region, Morocco. Trop. J. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 5, 1606–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barnett, J.A.; Payne, R.W.; Yarrow, D. Yeasts: Characteristics and Identification; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990; ISBN 978-0-521-35056-3. [Google Scholar]
  13. Abdelkafi, S.; Sayadi, S.; Ben Ali Gam, Z.; Casalot, L.; Labat, M. Bioconversion of Ferulic Acid to Vanillic Acid by Halomonas Elongata Isolated from Table-Olive Fermentation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 262, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Atlas, R.M. Handbook of Media for Environmental Microbiology, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; ISBN 978-0-429-12414-3. [Google Scholar]
  15. Norman, R.S.; Frontera-Suau, R.; Morris, P.J. Variability in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Lipopolysaccharide Expression during Crude Oil Degradation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5096–5103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chrzanowski, Ł.; Kaczorek, E.; Olszanowski, A. The Ability of Candida Maltosa for Hydrocarbon and Emulsified Hydrocarbon Degradation. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2006, 15, 47–51. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gargouri, B.; Mhiri, N.; Karray, F.; Aloui, F.; Sayadi, S. Isolation and Characterization of Hydrocarbon-Degrading Yeast Strains from Petroleum Contaminated Industrial Wastewater. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, e929424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ehrhardt, M.; Klungsøyr, J.; Law, R.J. Hydrocarbons: Review of Methods for Analysis in Sea Water, Biota, and Sediments; International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES): Copenhagen, Denmark, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, Z.; Fingas, M.; Blenkinsopp, S.; Sergy, G.; Landriault, M.; Sigouin, L.; Foght, J.; Semple, K.; Westlake, D.W. Comparison of Oil Composition Changes Due to Biodegradation and Physical Weathering in Different Oils. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 809, 89–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hasegawa, T.; Banno, I.; Yamauchi, S. A taxonomic study on the genus rhodotorula (Continued). J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1960, 6, 196–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Martini, A.; Vaughan, A.E.; Cardinali, G. Taxonomy Rules and Classification Hints for Non-Taxonomists Working with Unknown or JII-Identified Yeast Cultures. In Non-Conventional Yeasts in Genetics, Biochemistry and Biotechnology: Practical Protocols; Wolf, K., Breunig, K., Barth, G., Eds.; Springer Lab Manuals; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003; pp. 475–485. ISBN 978-3-642-55758-3. [Google Scholar]
  22. Molecular Typing of Wine Yeast Strains Saccharomyces Bayanus Var. Uvarum Using Microsatellite Markers—ScienceDirect. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0723202006000452?casa_token=ukctPZEnuvgAAAAA:W7-YjEC8-tfWbtaH8KhVF_tz1LV_Fs8mynAqcWfMH-6HZYCXUxOH6V6N9XPyizysMvnoUI8pWUI (accessed on 31 August 2021).
  23. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. 38—Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal rna genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. ISBN 978-0-12-372180-8. [Google Scholar]
  24. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. R Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the Number of Nucleotide Substitutions in the Control Region of Mitochondrial DNA in Humans and Chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Denaro, R.; D’Auria, G.; Di Marco, G.; Genovese, M.; Troussellier, M.; Yakimov, M.M.; Giuliano, L. Assessing Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Suitability for the Description of Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics in Hydrocarbon-Polluted Marine Environments. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Englert, C.J.; Kenzie, E.J.; Dragun, J. Bioremediation of Petroleum Products in Soil. In Principles and Practices for Petroleum Contaminated Soils; Routledge: London, UK, 1993; ISBN 978-0-203-74219-8. [Google Scholar]
  30. Surface Hydrophobicity of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Degrading Burkholderia Strains and Their Interactions with NAPLs and Surfaces—ScienceDirect. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927776510001062?casa_token=A8mau68yKTAAAAAA:w13dxgvmgdskmMvW1oMGrF_Dzstn8GkqL2tBdHJvYpaZhLZu13cNKSyvnEdrlEj30Yjd85Lyc_M (accessed on 31 August 2021).
  31. Masneuf-Pomarède, I.; Le Jeune, C.; Durrens, P.; Lollier, M.; Aigle, M.; Dubourdieu, D. Molecular Typing of Wine Yeast Strains Saccharomyces Bayanus Var. Uvarum Using Microsatellite Markers. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 30, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hesham, A.E.; Alamri, S.A.; Khan, S.; Mahmoud, M.E.; Mahmoud, H.M. Isolation and Molecular Genetic Characterization of a Yeast Strain Able to Degrade Petroleum Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 2218–2223. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bhaumik, P.; Dhepe, P.L. Chapter 1 Conversion of Biomass into Sugars. In Biomass Sugars for Non-Fuel Applications; RSC Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 1–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Haritash, A.K.; Kaushik, C.P. Biodegradation Aspects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): A Review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gonzalez, J.F.; Hu, W.-S. Effect of Glutamate on the Degradation of Pentachlorophenol by Flavobacterium sp. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1991, 35, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dos Santos VL, Monteiro A de S, Braga DT, Santoro MM. Phenol degradation by Aureobasidium pullulans FE13 isolated from industrial effluents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 1413–1420. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ijah, U.J.J. Studies on Relative Capabilities of Bacterial and Yeast Isolates from Tropical Soil in Degrading Crude Oil. Waste Manag. 1998, 18, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mohd, A. Presence of phenol in wastewater effluent and its removal: An overview. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gupta, S.K.; Singh, B.; Mungray, A.K.; Bharti, R.; Nema, A.K.; Pant, K.K.; Mulla, S.I. Bioelectrochemical technologies for removal of xenobiotics from wastewater. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 49, 101652. [Google Scholar]
  40. Adeleye, A.O.; Nkereuwem, M.E.; Omokhudu, G.I.; Amoo, A.O.; Shiaka, G.P.; Yerima, M.B. Adeleye AO, Nkereuwem ME, Omokhudu GI, Amoo AO, Shiaka GP, Yerima MB. Effect of microorganisms in the bioremediation of spent engine oil and petroleum related environmental pollution. J. App.l Sci. Environ. Manag. 2018, 22, 157–167. [Google Scholar]
  41. Omar, S.; Rehm, H. Degradation of N-Alkanes by Candida Parapsilosis and Penicillium Frequentans Immobilized on Granular Clay and Aquifer Sand. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 28, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Evolutionary relationships of the yeasts’ isolated strains. Green rectangle designates Phylogenetic relationships of strain SK1 with the Candida genus, and red rectangle designates Phylogenetic relationships of strain SK2 and SK3 with the Rhodotorula genus.
Figure 1. Evolutionary relationships of the yeasts’ isolated strains. Green rectangle designates Phylogenetic relationships of strain SK1 with the Candida genus, and red rectangle designates Phylogenetic relationships of strain SK2 and SK3 with the Rhodotorula genus.
Sustainability 14 03465 g001
Figure 2. Screening of crude oil degrading isolates based on the turbidity of the culture medium after one week of incubation.
Figure 2. Screening of crude oil degrading isolates based on the turbidity of the culture medium after one week of incubation.
Sustainability 14 03465 g002
Figure 3. The biodegradation rate of crude oil after 4, 15 and 21 days by the selected strains. Values that do not share the same letter are significantly different.
Figure 3. The biodegradation rate of crude oil after 4, 15 and 21 days by the selected strains. Values that do not share the same letter are significantly different.
Sustainability 14 03465 g003
Figure 4. The biodegradation rate of crude oil (A, L) supplemented with 0.5% glucose after 4, 15 and 21 days by the selected strains. Values that do not share the same letter are significantly different.
Figure 4. The biodegradation rate of crude oil (A, L) supplemented with 0.5% glucose after 4, 15 and 21 days by the selected strains. Values that do not share the same letter are significantly different.
Sustainability 14 03465 g004
Figure 5. Growth curve as a function of time and hydrocarbon substrates used by SK1, SK2 and SK3.
Figure 5. Growth curve as a function of time and hydrocarbon substrates used by SK1, SK2 and SK3.
Sustainability 14 03465 g005aSustainability 14 03465 g005b
Figure 6. Gas chromatogram showing the biodegradation of the crude oil, supplemented with 0.5% of glucose by (b) SK1, (c) SK2, (d) SK3 compared to the control (a).
Figure 6. Gas chromatogram showing the biodegradation of the crude oil, supplemented with 0.5% of glucose by (b) SK1, (c) SK2, (d) SK3 compared to the control (a).
Sustainability 14 03465 g006aSustainability 14 03465 g006b
Table 1. Locations and coordinates of different studied stations.
Table 1. Locations and coordinates of different studied stations.
StationsX (m)Y (m)Long (°)Latitude (°)Altitude (m)
FezSt1536,812.29385,356.78−4.9995038434.06655874417.80
Ain TaoujdatSt2516,521.40372,299.995.2196154333.94932340466.62
MeknesSt3486,955.04362,381.445.5394142933.85992761558.21
El-HajebSt4500,657.74343,619.64−5.3913044933.69079909872.69
SefrouSt5551,896.96358,566.53−4.8376168433.82433591819.27
AzzabaSt6564,183.82358,165.064.7047203233.8200477683.80
Bir tam tamSt7564,346.54369,849.05−4.7022792333.92540590580.83
IfraneSt8524,585.96330,314.77−5.1335081833.570517781648.16
GuigouSt9550,800.08309,567.03−4.8522482233.382465811489.58
BoulmanSt10569,872.57301,040.56−4.6478641833.304490761710.10
Outat el hajeSt11658,570.94305,612.54−3.6944210533.33630542796.13
TahlaSt12592,005.51384,107.56−4.4015973434.05195780571.20
Table 2. Biochemical and physiological characteristics of the yeast strains.
Table 2. Biochemical and physiological characteristics of the yeast strains.
SK1SK2SK3
Asexual reproduction
Filamentous growth+--
Acetic acid production---
Urease-++
Diazonium Blue B reaction-++
Glucose111
Inulin011
Sucrose111
Raffinose011
Melibiose111
Galactose111
Lactose111
Trehalose111
Maltose011
Melezitose111
Methyl-α-d-glucoside110
Soluble starch111
Cellobiose000
Salicin000
l-Sorbose111
l-Rhamnose111
d-Xylose110
l-Arabinose111
d-Arabinose011
d-Ribose000
Methanol000
Ethanol110
Glycerol111
Erythritol000
Ribitol111
Galactitol010
d-Mannitol000
d-Glucitol110
myo-Inositol100
dl-Lactate010
Succinate110
Citrate100
d-Gluconate111
d-Glucosamine000
n-Acetyl-d-glucosamine000
Hexadecane000
Nitrate111
Vitamin-free111
Nitrite011
d-Glucuronate000
Xylitol111
l-Tartaric acid111
Saccharic acid000
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid011
m-Hydroxybenzoic acid011
Gallic acid000
Gentisic acid011
Vanillic acid011
Ferulic acid011
Veratric acid011
Cycloheximide 0.01%010
Cycloheximide 0.1%010
Growth at 25 °C111
Growth at 30 °C111
Growth at 35 °C111
Growth at 37 °C111
Starch formation000
Table 3. Gas chromatographic analysis data showing percentage of crude oil degradation by selected isolates.
Table 3. Gas chromatographic analysis data showing percentage of crude oil degradation by selected isolates.
Oil Fractions %ControlSK1SK2SK3
C72.20.40.40.4
C95000
C102.60.60.21.2
C1110428
Phenol4520018
Ar-tumerone3000.8
C1621.2000
C281000.21
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benmessaoud, S.; Anissi, J.; Kara, M.; Assouguem, A.; AL-Huqail, A.A.; Germoush, M.O.; Ullah, R.; Ercisli, S.; Bahhou, J. Isolation and Characterization of Three New Crude Oil Degrading Yeast Strains, Candida parapsilosis SK1, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa SK2 and SK3. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063465

AMA Style

Benmessaoud S, Anissi J, Kara M, Assouguem A, AL-Huqail AA, Germoush MO, Ullah R, Ercisli S, Bahhou J. Isolation and Characterization of Three New Crude Oil Degrading Yeast Strains, Candida parapsilosis SK1, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa SK2 and SK3. Sustainability. 2022; 14(6):3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benmessaoud, Safaâ, Jaouad Anissi, Mohammed Kara, Amine Assouguem, Arwa Abdulkreem AL-Huqail, Mousa O. Germoush, Riaz Ullah, Sezai Ercisli, and Jamila Bahhou. 2022. "Isolation and Characterization of Three New Crude Oil Degrading Yeast Strains, Candida parapsilosis SK1, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa SK2 and SK3" Sustainability 14, no. 6: 3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop