Next Article in Journal
Opportunities, Challenges, and Uncertainties in Urban Road Transport Automation
Previous Article in Journal
Agricultural Biogas Production—Climate and Environmental Impacts
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Driving Factors for R&D Intensity: Evidence from Global and Income-Level Panels

Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1854; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031854
by Cristiana Tudor 1,* and Robert Sova 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1854; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031854
Submission received: 17 January 2022 / Revised: 31 January 2022 / Accepted: 3 February 2022 / Published: 6 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

More emphasis on the financial pressure on countries need to be embedded

English language and style are fine/minor spell check required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The research is interesting and the paper's structure shows a logical development and a good documentation.

The methodologies are well presented and appropriate  to the proposed objective of the research paper.

However, I consider necessary to review the line 283 and 306 because the equations require some editing.

It could be necessary to explain better the differences of the sign of coefficient in the case of renewable energy between high, middle -income countries and global. Why the positive impact is only in the case of middle-income countries? Also , why in the robustness checks, the sign of coefficients in the case of high-income countries are different in the case of REC and Trade Open variable as compared to Table 5. How does the absence of the HTEXP variable explain such differences?

I consider that the paper can be improved in the Conclusion section by differentiating the policy recommendations between group of countries.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The empirical strategy needs clarification. Please justify using the dynamic system-generalized method of moments (SYS-GMM) panel model to uncover driving factors for R&D intensity. There is a discussion from lines number 117 to 126. However, these lines can be improved to justify using these estimation techniques to determine the driving factors for R&D intensity. 


The reader might struggle to arrive at the Research Objective and Research Questions. Would you please mention these critical components of your research paper (the Research Objective and Research Questions) clearly? 


Please explain the period selection since the WDI usually are available for a wide range of periods. 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Back to TopTop