Next Article in Journal
Combining Multiple Biomarkers to Evaluate the Environmental Stress in Cyprinid Populations
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Algal Nanotechnology for Leather Wastewater Treatment and Heavy Metal Removal Efficiency
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Thermophilic Microbial Agents on Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Microbial Communities during Co-Composting of Pig Manure and Tea Stalks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential of Organic Amendments for Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil–Coriander System: Environmental Fate and Associated Ecological Risk
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cadmium (Cd) and Copper (Cu) Exposure and Bioaccumulation Arrays in Farm Ruminants: Impact of Forage Ecotypes, Ecological Sites and Body Organs

1
Department of Plant Biology & Soil Science, Universidad de Vigo, Campus Lagoas Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain
2
Department of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
3
Institute of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
4
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
5
Institute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity (COMAV, UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
6
Department of Environmental Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, No. 168, Jifeng E. Rd., Wufeng District, Taichung 413310, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 12595; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912595
Submission received: 6 August 2022 / Revised: 28 September 2022 / Accepted: 29 September 2022 / Published: 3 October 2022

Abstract

:
Copper (Cu) and cadmium (Cd) metal distribution in soil–plant ecosystems and their public health risk impact on ruminants (cows, buffalo, and sheep) are explored in the present investigation. Five different forage crops were selected, and the foraging responses of three types of ruminants (cows, buffalo, and sheep) at three ecological sites were evaluated. The soil of these three ecological sites was metal polluted (due to wastewater irrigation) and was studied to evaluate the metal contamination and pollution load index. For the assessment of Cd and Cu, soil, vegetation, blood, hair, and feces samples were collected and analysed using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. High consumption of fodder crops (Sorghum bicolor Kuntze, Sesbania bispinosa (Jacq.) W. Wight, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Suaeda fruticosa (L.) Forssk., and Tribulus terrestris L.) by cows and buffalo at site-III resulted in an increase in daily Cu and Cd intake. The pollution load index was higher at site-II and site-III, indicating a severe health risk scenario for local inhabitants. Cd and Cu were at their maximum levels in fodder crops. A significant increase in the concentrations of Cd and Cu was found in the blood, hair, and feces of cows and buffalo at site-III. Ecological indicators such as the bioaccumulation factor, the pollution load index, and the enrichment factor were found to be higher in buffalo than cows. The Cd level in forages was highest at the site-III Cd level and in the order of S. bispinosa > S. fruticosa > T. terresteris > C. dactylon > S. bicolor. Although these levels were lower than the permissible maximum limit, they were generally higher in the forage crops. Exposure of local inhabitants to the consumption of milk and meat from these cattle showed the serious health risks consequences. This situation can be properly managed by general monitoring of soil and vegetation pollution, avoiding metal contamination in the soil and food chain components, and using treated waste water and other alternate water sources for forage irrigation.

1. Introduction

Unchecked landfilling, industrial effluent disposal, and wastewater used for irrigating crops can lead to the bioaccumulation of heavy metals (HMs); the loss of biodiversity; the deterioration of, water, soil, and atmosphere quality; and pose risks to animal and human health [1,2]. Heavy metal pollution and toxicity severely inhibit the growth, yield, and quality of cereals, forages, and fruit crops via interfering in their physiological, cellular, and biochemical attributes, such as inhibition of photosynthesis, cell division, energy production, and protein synthesis. These pollutants are serious risks to the ecosystem and to human health [3,4,5].
Cadmium is a toxic metal that enters the soil–plant system via low-quality urban wastewater irrigation that is most often polluted with industrial discharges with a heavy load of toxic metals [6]. Cd is highly toxic at higher concentrations to plants, animals, and human health and is a major source of carcinogenic disorders [7]. Cadmium is readily soluble in water, easily absorbed by plants, and is a serious environmental pollutant in agroecosystems [8]. In urban or industrial wastewaters, heavy metals gather in sewage sludge and are the biggest source of contamination for the soil rhizosphere. Water bodies receive heavy metals from agricultural drainage because of the constant use of fertilizers that exhibit heavy metals. Heavy metals are considered the most dangerous among numerous soil pollutants due to their persistency and toxicity in the water–soil–plant environment [8,9,10].
Even though Cu is necessary for agriculture crops, higher amounts pose serious risks to the terrestrial ecosystem as well as to the health of both animals and people. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals might increase the pollution load in the soil rhizosphere, compromise the human and ruminant immune system, and result in some neurological problems, kidney failure, digestive system and heart disease [11]. In the past, several studies have been conducted to quantify the health risks associated with the ingestion of heavy metals, including Cu and Cd, by consuming contaminated food crops [12,13]. For plants, many heavy metals are crucial microelements and are subsequently involved in a varied assortment of enzymatic redox responses. Root nodulation was inhibited, and the quantity of useful nodules significantly decreased [14]. Some of these nutrient elements have a defensive role contrary to the poisonous effects of Cd stress [15]. Heavy metals are non-biodegradable and may be taken up by plants, including agricultural crops. For this reason, for the safety of the environment, communications detailing metal–plant contamination is also significant. Recently, a number of studies have drawn attention to heavy metal accretion in plants [16,17].
Water scarcity is very common in several countries, including Pakistan. Therefore, alternative sources of water, such as treated wastewater, rainwater, and water from retaining ponds constructed in areas at risk of water scarcity, should be used for field crop irrigation [2]. The consumption of crops cultivated on soil that received wastewater during the crop growth cycle might be loaded with large amounts of trace metals, which will ultimately pose a large risk to the public and to ruminants [18]. Previously, some authors documented heavy metal contamination in different fodder crops, translocated to feeding cattle’s blood and milk and their possible entry into the food chain [12,15,19,20]. These studies neglected HM entry into the food chain and instead concentrated on the presence of metals in the plant–soil relationship. The present study, for the first time, examines the bioavailability of cadmium (Cd) and copper (Cu) in the four most cultivated pasture crops (Sorghum bicolor Kuntze, Sesbania bispinosa (Jacq.) W. Wight, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Suaeda fruticosa (L.) Forssk., and Tribulus terrestris L.) in Punjab and their bioaccumulation in soil, translocation, and pollution load into these pasture crops and subsequent health risks to grazing ruminants (sheep, cows, and buffalo). Different ecological sites were chosen to evaluate the biomonitoring of selected pastures to study environmental hazards and assessment of the potential risks of heavy metal pollution to human health.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Area, Season Expedition and Sample Collections

The present study was conducted in Punjab province (District Toba Tek Singh), Pakistan. Toba-Tek-Singh geographically (Supplementary Figure S1) situated at 30°33′ to 31°2′ N and 72°08′ to 72°48′ E. Dry climate extends from April to October, while May, June, and July are the most sizzling months. The mid-year season temperature is in the range of 42 °C and 29 °C, while cooler months include December, January, and February. Annual precipitation is mostly around 158 mm. The soil of Toba-Tek-Singh is mostly alluvial plain.

2.2. Soil and Forages Sample Collection

The study sites were selected at random and 1 km away from roads. The soil samples were collected (3 replicates) at a soil depth of 0–20 cm [21]. Soil and plant samples were taken and sealed in labeled paper bags. Three different ecological sites were selected to collect the soil samples, and the samples were named soil from the S. bicolor plot, soil from the S. bispinosa plot, soil from the C. dactylon plot, soil from the P. fruticosa plot, and soil from the T. terresteris plot. The forage chosen was jawar, normally referred to as “Sorghum bicolor”, Jantar, referred to as Sesbania bispinosa, common grass frequently known as Cynadaon dactylon, Psuedo fruticosa, usually called wild plant, and Tribulus tristeris, frequently known as bhakra. Forage and soil samples were dried in an oven at 72 °C for 48 h to achieve a steady dry weight. The same forage plots were used as grazing units for selected animals. The oven-dried soil samples were subjected to digestion and analysis.

2.3. Animal Maintenance and Sample Collection

After securing the necessary ethical approvals, adult livestock (sheeps, cows, and buffalo) were used for the assessment of Cd and Cu bioassimilation. The weight of the buffalo, cows, and sheep ranged from 250–420 kg, 300–350 kg, and 40–60 kg, respectively. Healthy, disease free, and adult animals were used for the feeding trial. Blood, hair, and feces samples were taken from the farm ruminants (sheep, buffalo, and cows). For the purpose of gathering animal samples, a total of 10 animals (from each animal type) were chosen (at each site). The healthy animals were selected for blood plasma sampling and to determine the heavy metals (Cd and Cu). A specimen of blood (15 mL) was collected from the jugular vein of the selected animals with the help of heparin needles to avoid blood coagulation [12]. Plasma was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 2 min to make a plasma parcel. The serum was taken to the laboratory in a chilled box and maintained frozen at −20 °C before investigation [21]. The animal’s body was used to gather hair samples. Hair samples were cleansed of all externally deposited pollutants by first being rinsed in acetone and then in distilled water [3,14,20]. We used the method described by Ghazzal et al. [22] to collect feces samples from each type of animal. First, for digesting purposes, all samples were air-dried, kept in an oven to five days, and then stored in plastic bags with labels.

2.4. Soil Sample Digestion

Soil samples were dried in an oven for 72 h and ground to fine powder. The powder soil sample (2 g) was added to concentrated H2SO4 (20 mL) in a flask for digestion. The procedure was repeated twice with the end product a colorless solution. Following the addition of distilled water to achieve the final volume of 60 mL, the samples were stored in glass tubes for further analysis [12].

2.5. Digestion of Fodder Crops Samples

Forage samples (Sorghum bicolor Kuntze, Sesbania bispinosa (Jacq.) W. Wight, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Suaeda fruticosa (L.) Forssk., and Tribulus terrestris L.) grown on field plots irrigated with wastewater were harvested. These samples were dried in an oven for 72 h to remove moisture and ground using a blender. A 1 g feed sample was decomposed in H2SO4 and H2O2 (4:2) at 250 °C for 3–4 h until the solution became colorless and thick white smoke rose in the flask. The mixture was incubated, washed with distilled water, passed through filter paper, and diluted to 50 mL [12].

2.6. Digestion of a Blood Sample

The blood that was anticoagulant was centrifuged. Then, 2 mL of blood plasma and 2 mL of H2SO4 were mixed, and a combination of sample tests was left overnight for digestion. All the natural tissues were broken down, and a solution of sample was digested by warming at 120 °C. The treated samples were cooled, and the processed digested samples were diluted up to 50 mL using distilled water and set in glass tubes for assessment.

2.7. Atomic Absorption Spectrum

Metal concentrations were determined utilizing the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) (Shimadzu double beam AA-6300 and Perkin Elmer Analyst 400) [12]. Quality assurance was achieved by measuring natural matrix certified reference material (CRM-1570) and measuring duplicates for each batch of samples to ensure the stability of the outcomes. The samples were handled cautiously to inhibit pollution. Double distilled H2O was used during the testing, and glassware was methodically washed. An analysis was carried out to validate the investigative steps by homogenizing the examined samples with a varying quantity of standard solutions. The environmental pollution was determined by different pollution indices as reported previously [12,15,16].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA, and means were the average of the three replicates (n = 3). The significant variation was determined among the different treatments using Tukey’s HSD test as post hoc at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed by the SPSS statistical package (SPSS 17.0, Chicago, IL, USA).

2.9. Pollution Load Index (PLI)

PLI was estimated by the equation given by Liu et al. [13]:
PLI = ‘metal content in examined soil sample/metal concentration in reference soil’.
The reference value of Cd and Cu in soil was 1.49 and 8.39 mg/kg [23,24].

2.10. Bioconcentration Factor (BCF)

It was estimated by following the formula as reported by Chen et al. [14]:
BCF = [M] Fodder samples/[M] Soil sample,

2.11. Daily Intake of Metal (DIM)

Metals enter the body of organisms through diverse pathways, through skin contact, during breathing, or by consuming contaminated fodder [15].
The formula was that reported by Bonnet et al. [16]: DIM = C metal × F conversion factor × D food intake/B average weight of sheep. DIM by ingesting of forages was 1.51 (kg per sheep)m and the normal weight of sheep was 45 kg
A conversion factor of 0.085 was applied to change green plant mass to dry weight [24]. A tolerable daily intake limit of Cd and Cu is 0.21 and 3.01 (mg kg−1day−1).

2.12. Health Risk Index (HRI)

The oral reference dose value for Cd and Cu is 0.001 and 0.04 (mg kg−1day−1) reported by the World Health Organization [25].
Health risk index = Daily intake of Metal/RfD [13].

2.13. Enrichment Factor (EF)

It was determined by the formula of Buat-Menard and Chesselet [17].
EF = [M] Fodder E/[M] Soil E/[M] Fodder S/[M] Soil S. Average absorption of Cd and Cu in forages is 0.2 and 73.3 mg/kg, and in soil it is 2.8 and 8.39 mg/kg, respectively [18].

3. Results

3.1. Bioaccumulation of Cd in Soil and Forage Crops: Ecological Risk Assessment

The soil of T. terrestris at site-III contained the highest concentration of Cd, which was followed by the soil of P. fruticosa at site-III (Figure 1A). In the S. bicolor soil at site-I, the lowest Cd level was found. All forages had soil with a Cd content ranging from 2.09 mg/kg to 4.23 mg/kg. The levels of Cd in the soil at Site I were in the following order: C. dactylon > T. terresteris > S. bicolor > S. bispinosa > S. fruticosa. The soil at site-II had the following Cd levels: C. dactylon > T. terresteris > S. bispinosa > S. fruticosa > S. bicolor. T. terresteris > S. fruticosa was the order of the soil’s Cd levels at site-III.
The total Cd level varied from 1.69 to 4.65 mg/kg depending on the type of feed. S. bispinosa at site-III had the highest Cd level in forages (4.65 mg/kg), followed by S. bispinosa (3.64 mg/kg) at site-III, and S. fruticosa (3.45 mg/kg) at site-II. S. fruticosa at site-I had the lowest level (1.69 mg/kg) of the substance (Figure 1B). According to an analysis of variance, Cd had a considerable impact on site and animal but had non-significant impact on site x animal. Cd levels in forage at site-I were found in the following order: S. bispinosa > S. bicolor > C. dactylon > T. terresteris > and S. fruticosa. The Cd levels in the forage were T. terresteris > S. bispinosa > S. fruticosa > C. dactylon > S. bicolor at site-II. The order of the forage’s Cd levels at site-III was S. bispinosa > S. fruticosa > T. terresteris > C. dactylon > S. bicolor (Figure 1B).
The soil of S. bispinosa at site-I had a larger bioconcentration factor (BCF) than that of P. fruticosa, which had a lower BCF. The BCF was between 0.789 to 1.685 mg/kg (Table 1). T. terrestris at site-III had a higher pollution load index, but S. bispinosa at site-I had a lower one. The range for the pollutant load index was 0.746 mg/kg to 1.511 mg/kg (Table 1). S. bispinosa at site-III had a greater enrichment factor, while P. fruticosa at site-I had a lower one. The range of the enrichment factor was 5.883 mg/kg to 12.552 mg/kg (Table 1).

3.2. Metal Level of Cd in Animal Blood, Hair, and Feces

At site-III, buffalo blood had the highest concentration of Cd, whereas at site-I, sheep blood had the lowest concentration. The range of the Cd concentration in animal blood was 0.99 mg/L to 2.22 mg/L (Table 2). At site-III, sheep hair had a higher concentration of Cd, whereas site-I’s buffalo had the lowest concentration. The range of Cd concentrations in animal hair was 1.01 mg/kg to 2.34 mg/kg (Table 2). At site-III and site-I, respectively, cow feces had the highest and lowest concentrations of Cd. Animal waste contained Cd levels ranging from 0.66 mg/kg to 2.19 mg/kg (Table 2).

3.3. Human Health Risk Assessment from Dietary Intake

Daily amounts of metal measured for Cd in S. bispinosa were higher at site-III in buffalo samples of T. terrestris and lower at site-I in sheep samples. Metal consumption per day ranged from 0.0026 mg/kg to 0.0089 mg/kg (Table 3). S. bispinosa at site-II in buffalo had a higher health risk index value for Cd, whereas P. fruticosa at site-I in sheep had a lower value. The range of the health risk index factor was between 2.4899 and 8.9829 mg/kg (Table 3).

3.4. Bioaccumulation of Copper (Cu) in Soil and Forage Crops: Ecological Risk Assessment

Cu had a significant impact on the site but not on the soil and their interaction (site x soil) according to an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The soil of T. terresteris at site-III had the highest concentration of Cu, whereas soil from site-I had the lowest concentration (Figure 1C). All forages had soil with a range of 6.56 mg/kg to 11.12 mg/kg Cu content. Cu had a non-significant effect on forages but a significant effect on site and site x forage according to an analysis of variance (data not shown). The forage S. bispinosa at site-II had the highest concentration of Cu, whereas the forage T. terrestris at site-I had the lowest concentration. Cu content in all forages was 12.92 mg/kg to 19.16 mg/kg (Figure 1D).
The BCF for Cu was found to be higher at site-I for S. fruticosa and lower at site- III for S. bispinosa. Between 1.620 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg, the BCF factor was present (Table 4). At sites I and III, it was discovered that T. terrestris had pollution load indices in Cu that were greater and lower, respectively. The range for the pollutant load index was 0.782 mg/kg to 1.325 mg/kg (Table 4). P. fruticosa at site-I had a greater enrichment factor than S. bispinosa at site-III. From 0.185 mg/kg to 0.271 mg/kg was the enrichment factor (Table 4).

3.5. Cu Metal Animal Blood, Hair, and Feces

Cu had a substantial impact on site and source, but not on animal, animal × site, site × source, or site × animal × source according to an analysis of variance (Tables S1 and S2). At site-III, cow blood had the highest concentration of copper, whereas at site-I, buffalo blood had the lowest concentration. Animal blood contained 2.07 mg/L to 3.86 mg/L of copper (Table 5). Cows in site-II had the highest concentration of copper, while buffalo at site-I had the lowest concentration. Animal hair had 2.05 mg/kg to 3.80 mg/kg of copper. At site-III, cow feces had the highest concentration of Cu, whereas buffalo feces had the lowest concentration. Cu concentrations in animal waste varied from 2.17 mg/kg to 3.97 mg/kg (Table 5).

3.6. Human Health Risk Assessment (Cu)

Daily metal intakes for Cu T. terrestris were higher and lower in buffalo samples at site-III and lower in sheep samples at site-I, respectively. The daily metal intake was between 0.0190 mg/kg to 0.0375 mg/kg (Table 6). S. bispinosa at site-II in buffalo had a higher health risk index value for Cu, whereas T. terrestris at site-I in sheep had a lower value. From 0.4759 mg/kg to 0.9253 mg/kg, the health risk index factor was measured (Table 6).

4. Discussion

Cd is a harmful metal and is toxic to people and other living organisms. It exhibits biological activity in both terrestrial and aquatic environments [22]. Numerous anthropogenic releases of toxic heavy metals into environments are indeed massive and pervasive and cause cadmium release into terrestrial ecosystems. Due to its high mobility in contaminated soils, the deposition of Cd in plants in Cd-polluted soil causes major issues for livestock and public health [3,4,12]. Cd toxicity damages the human body’s various organs, but it concentrates primarily in the kidneys and leads to major problems such as kidney stones, pulmonary emphysema, and damage to the renal tubules [23].
Our results are in agreement with the Cd level detected by Khan et al. [5], who reported that among the top toxins, cadmium ranks seventh. The levels of cadmium in unpolluted soils were typically lower than 0.5 mg kg−1 but can extend up to 3.0 mg kg−1 depending on the soil-parent material. Cd can be easily absorbed by plants growing in Cd-accompanied soils, and its accumulation may cause numerous physiological, biochemical, and organizational disorders. Cd adversely affects seed germination, stand establishment, plant growth, nutrient uptake and assimilation, enzymatic activity, ultrastructural and oxidative damage, alterations in antioxidant defense systems and stress proteins, carbon metabolism, and yield reduction [24,25].
Feeding of farm ruminants (sheep, cows and buffalo) on the contaminated pasture crops (Sorghum bicolor Kuntze, Sesbania bispinosa (Jacq.) W. Wight, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Suaeda fruticosa (L.) Forssk., and Tribulus terrestris L.) caused a significant increase in Cd and Cu concentration in feces, hair, and blood plasma of sheep, cows, and buffalo. The Cd content was minimal in sheep blood and maximum in buffalo blood (Table 1). The maximum concentration of Cd was detected in sheep hair and the lowest in buffalo hair (Table 1). The highest and lowest levels of Cd were found in cow feces at site-III and site-I, respectively. According to reports from Spain [26] and Nigeria [27], the Cd level in blood was higher during different sampling campaigns. The higher level of Cd in blood may be associated with the consumption of pastures grown on contaminated soils with Cd. The heavy metal content in hair can be a good indicator of the accumulation of heavy metals in the animal’s body. A study by Rashed and Soltan [28] with Fe, Mn, Pb, and Cd in wool from goats, sheep, and camels showed an association between the metal content in hair and Fe and Mn in wool. The hair of cows in the exposed area showed higher Cd and Pb values than in the untreated area, and the Cd level correlated with the Cd level in blood [29].
The pollution of soils caused by heavy metals has been increased due to excavating, melting, industrial pesticides, discharges of trace metals, metalloids, and industrial effluents [30]. The metals that are present in wastewater are less soluble in water. They tend to gather in soils and then accumulate in plants and cause severe ecological risks [31]. In this context, the transfer of heavy metals from soil to plants is one of the main pathways for human contact through the food chain. In urban or periurban areas, unprocessed wastewater is commonly used for agriculture [32]. The Cd take-up, toxicity, and detoxifying components in the water–soil–plant system have been completely examined previously by several authors [32,33,34]. From plants and animals feeding on contaminated forages, Cd can easily enter into the food chain. Meanwhile, Cd contamination influences the various organs of the human body, including kidneys, and causes serious harm, including pneumonic emphysema, renal cylindrical harm, and kidney stones [23]. Cadmium in minerals replaces calcium (Ca), due to having indistinguishable charge and comparable ions and substance conduct [34]. In this way, it can undoubtedly move to the human body and be stored in different organs at higher concentrations. Cadmium toxicity seriously harms the liver and bones and can significantly decrease Ca uptake in the body [23,34].
Ahmad et al. [35], reported that Cu showed elevated quantities of 2.79–4.13 in contaminated soil irrigated with wastewater. Environmental factors such as low soil pH, including excessive pesticide or insecticide use, can increase the accumulation of copper in the soil. The results showed that the Cu content in the forage samples varied with the season and site. The Cu content in the different forage crops ranged from 12.92–19.16 mg/kg, with the Cu content lower in T. terrestris and higher in S. bispinosa. In addition, the Cu content in the forage crops was above the permissible limit value for Cu in animal feed [36] from India. However, the Cu content in the forage crops was higher than that of Khan et al. [12]. A significant difference (p < 0.05) in the plant Cu level was observed between the plant tissues, such as the roots (26–53 mg kg−1), leaves (23–28 mg kg−1), and stems (14–21 mg kg−1), of Boehmeria nivea L. [37], while the bioaccumulation and translocation factors were less than one. The Cu levels in the blood ranged from 2.07–3.86 mg/L (Table 5).
In Rasheed et al. [38], the Cu level was significantly higher in the soil samples (3.54 to 4.08 mg/kg). Meanwhile, a higher concentration of Cu was observed in cow blood plasma. In another study, higher levels of different heavy metals were observed in milk and cheese samples from contaminated areas [39]. It was found that the Cu concentration in cheese samples on the roadside was significantly higher than in uncontaminated cheese samples from the green zone. The higher Cu content is due to the use of copper-contaminated pasture forage, water, and animal feed on contaminated soils. Asthma and heart problems are a common cause of consumption of food commodities by Cu [40]. The proven Cu content was well above the recommended values and can therefore have a negative effect on living organisms. The cow blood serum from 30 different farms in Poland showed significantly higher concentrations of Cu [41]. The concentration of toxic metals was higher in calves from contaminated areas of northern Spain [42].
Low soil and water pH levels have been linked to macro mineral deficiencies and micro mineral abundance in buffalo pastures [43,44]. Toxic metals can build up in food and in grazing buffalo. However, research on this aspect is limited, especially in flooded meadows. An increase in the pH was observed by several workers following bioaccumulation of Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd [45]. Human activity near sewage treatment plants and household waste can contribute to environmental pollution and terrestrial system toxicity. Earlier studies in flooded grasslands showed that the dietary levels of Cu, Fe, and Mn exceeded the upper limits for grazing ruminants [46], which could be related to the infectivity of various plants. Anthropogenic activities have caused cadmium to be present in soil, water, and air. The acceptable limit for Cd in cattle diets is 0.05 mg/kg. Cattle with high levels of Cd experience poisoning, appetite loss, and reduced growth [46].
Use of industrial, municipal, and sewage wastewater for irrigation of fields crops is a common practice. The freshwater supplies are in short supply and wastewater is discharged into the drainage canals which reach the fields located near where vegetables and fodder crops are grown [12,31,34]. Lack of freshwater resources leads farmers to use wastewater for irrigation: wastewater that might contain many important nutrients.
Through the consumption of contaminated forage crops, heavy metals were dissolved in the sheep, cow, and buffalo stomachs, taken into the blood, and integrated into the body’s circulatory system. The blood circulatory system is a very sensitive system because the blood not only reflects how these metals are transported to different organs, but also serves as a crucial target for their harmful effects when Cd and Cu are present [47,48,49,50,51,52]. In the current investigation, Cd and Cu were assimilated into the blood, hair, and feces of cows, buffalo, and sheep through their blood, and their quantities were much greater after consuming metal-contaminated forages. It has been found that consumption of contaminated forage crops has a significant effect on the bioassimilation of Cd and Cu in cows, buffalo, and sheep.

5. Conclusions

From the present study, we conclude that Cd and Cu bioaccumulation was below the permissible limits, but forage crops cultivated on metal-contaminated soil (irrigated with wastewater) showed higher Cd and Cu concentrations. The results showed that ruminant samples (blood, hair, and feces) also had higher Cd and Cu concentrations, which varied from one site to another. Cd and Cu entry via dietary intake was the major source of exposure to these environmental pollutants. Cd was highest in buffalo blood, while higher and lowest concentrations of Cd were found in cow feces. However, the bioconcentration factors for Cd and Cu demonstrate low toxicity in the soil–plant–livestock ecosystem.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su141912595/s1, Figure S1: Map of the study district (Toba Tek Singh), Punjab, Pakistan; Table S1: Analysis of variance for Cd metal in soil, in forages and in animal blood, hair and faces; Table S2: Analysis of Variance for Cu metal in soil, in forages, in Animal blood, Hair and Faces; Table S3: TREATMENT DETAILS.

Author Contributions

M.N. (Majida Naeem): data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft; Z.I.K.: formal analysis, writing—original draft; M.I.H.: data curation, investigation, resources, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; M.N. (Majida Naeem), Z.I.K., S.A. and M.N. (Muhammad Nadeem): supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; M.A.A.: formal analysis, writing—review and editing; O.V.: writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; K.A. and H.-H.Y.: resources, supervision, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that this research work is supported and funded by the Department of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan. We acknowledge the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for their financial cooperation in research project #2484/13. Moreover, the authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R186), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Institutional Ethics Committee of University of Sargodha (Approval No.25-A18 IEC UOS) has allowed all the protocols used in this experiment.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from formers to conduct the study and to collect the samples. They were briefed about the research plan in detail.

Data Availability Statement

Data and material are available for research purposes and for reference.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support, assistance, and engagement of collaborators from staff at Pakistan Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR) laboratories, Lahore, Pakistan for assistance in heavy metal analysis from plant, soil and animal samples. Moreover, the authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R186), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Hussain, M.I.; Farooq, M.; Muscolo, A.; Rehman, A. Crop diversification and saline water irrigation as potential strategies to save freshwater resources and reclamation of marginal soils—A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 28695–28729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hussain, M.I.; Qureshi, A.S. Health risks of heavy metal exposure and microbial contamination through consumption of vegetables irrigated with treated wastewater at Dubai, UAE. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 11213–11226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, F.; Khan, Z.I.; Zafar, A.; Ma, J.; Nadeem, M.; Ahmad, K.; Shehzadi, M.; Wajid, K.; Bashir, H.; Munir, M.; et al. Evaluation of toxicity potential of cobalt in wheat irrigated with wastewater: Health risk implications for public. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 21119–21131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Khan, Z.I.; Ugulu, I.; Umar, S.; Ahmad, K.; Mehmood, N.; Ashfaq, A.; Bashir, H.; Sohail, M. Potential toxic metal accumulation in soil, forage and blood plasma of buffaloes sampled from Jhang, Pakistan. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2018, 101, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, Z.I.; Arshad, N.; Ahmad, K.; Nadeem, M.; Ashfaq, A.; Wajid, K.; Sana, M. Toxicological potential of cobalt in forage for ruminants grown in polluted soil: A health risk assessmentfrom trace metal pollution for livestock. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 15381–15389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ebrahimi, M.; Khalili, N.; Razi, S.; Keshavarz-Fathi, M.; Khalili, N.; Rezaei, N. Effects of lead and cadmium on the immune system and cancer progression. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2020, 18, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Haider, F.U.; Liqun, C.; Coulter, J.A.; Cheema, S.A.; Wu, J.; Zhang, R.; Wenjun, M.; Farooq, M. Cadmium toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation strategies. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 211, 111887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Duan, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yu, T.; Yang, Q.; Liu, X.; Ji, W.; Jiang, H.; Zhuo, X.; Wu, T.; Qin, J.; et al. Geogenic cadmium pollution in multimedians caused by black shales in Luzhai, Guangxi. Environ. Poll. 2020, 260, 113905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Villatoro-Pulido, M.; Font, R.; Obregón-Cano, S.; Moreno-Rojas, R.; Amaro-López, M.Á.; Anter, J.; Muñoz-Serrano, A.; Bailón, A.D.H.; Alonso-Moraga, Á.; Del Río-Celestino, M. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of metal (oid) s bioactivated in rocket leaves (Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa Miller). Chemosphere 2013, 93, 2554–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Akhter, P.; Khan, Z.I.; Hussain, M.I.; Ahmad, K.; Farooq Awan, M.U.; Ashfaq, A.; Chaudhry, U.K.; Fahad Ullah, M.; Abideen, Z.; Almaary, K.S.; et al. Assessment of Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soil and Garlic Influenced by Waste-Derived Organic Amendments. Biology 2022, 11, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Akhtar, S.; Khan, Z.I.; Ahmad, K.; Nadeem, M.; Ejaz, A.; Hussain, M.I.; Ashraf, M.A. Assessment of lead toxicity in diverse irrigation regimes and potential health implications of agriculturally grown crops in Pakistan. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 271, 107743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ilechukwu, I.; Osuji, L.C.; Okoli, C.P.; Onyema, M.O.; Ndukwe, G.I. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in soils and health risk consequences of human exposure within the vicinity of hot mix asphalt plants in Rivers State, Nigeria. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, W.-H.; Zhao, J.-Z.; Ouyang, Z.-Y.; Soderlund, L.; Liu, G.-H. Impacts of sewage irrigation on heavy metals distribution and contamination in Beijing, China. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, F.; Ma, J.; Akhtar, S.; Khan, Z.I.; Ahmad, K.; Ashfaq, A.; Nawaz, H.; Nadeem, M. Assessment of chromium toxicity and potential health implications of agriculturally diversely irrigated food crops in the semi-arid regions of South Asia. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 272, 107833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ashfaq, A.; Khan, Z.I.; Ahmad, K.; Ashraf, M.A.; Hussain, M.I.; Elghareeb, E.M. Hazard of selenium metal contamination in vegetables grown in municipal solid waste amended soil: Assessment of the potential sources and systemic health effects. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 271, 107768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bonnet, M.; Camares, O.; Veisseire, P. The Effects of zinc and influence of Acremonium loliion growth parameters, chlorophyll a fluorescence and antioxidant enzyme activities of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv Apollo). J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 945–953. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Buat-Menard, P.; Chesselet, R. Variable influence of the atmospheric flux on the trace metal chemistry of oceanic suspended matter. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1979, 42, 399–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dosumu, O.O.; Abdus-Salam, N.; Oguntoye, S.; Afdekale, F.A. Trace metals bioaccumulation by some Nigerian vegetables. Centrepoint 2005, 13, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ahmad, T.; Nazar, S.; Ahmad, K.; Khan, Z.I.; Bashir, H.; Ashfaq, A.; Munir, M.; Munir, Z.; Hussain, K.; Alkahtani, J.; et al. Monitoring of copper accumulation in water, soil, forage, and cows impacted by heavy automobiles in Sargodha, Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Poll. Resh. 2021, 28, 29110–29116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Castro-González, N.P.; Moreno-Rojas, R.; Calderón-Sánchez, F.; Moreno-Ortega, A.; Juárez-Meneses, M. Assessment risk to children’s health due to consumption of cow’s milk in polluted areas in Puebla and Tlaxcala, México. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2017, 10, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qureshi, A.S.; Hussain, M.I.; Ismail, S.; Khan, Q.M. Evaluating heavy metal accumulation and potential health risks in vegetables irrigated with treated wastewater. Chemosphere 2016, 161, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ghazzal, M.; Khan, Z.I.; Ahmad, K.; Mehmood, N.; Mahpara, S.; Nadeem, M.; Munir, M.; Wajid, K.; Sohail, M.; Malik, I.S.; et al. Incidence and health risk assessment of grazing animals due to toxic metal residues (Cd and Mn) in Sahiwal, Sargodha. Pure Appl. Biol. 2020, 9, 872–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. El Rasafi, T.; Oukarroum, A.; Haddioui, A.; Song, H.; Kwon, E.E.; Bolan, N.; Tack, F.M.; Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Rinklebe, J. Cadmium stress in plants: A critical review of the effects, mechanisms, and tolerance strategies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 675–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ugulu, I.; Akhter, P.; Khan, Z.I.; Akhtar, M.; Ahmad, K. Trace metal accumulation in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) grown using organic fertilizers and health risk assessment from consumption. Food Res. Int. 2021, 140, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alonso, M.L.; Benedito, J.L.; Miranda, M.; Castillo, C.; Hernandez, J.; Shore, R.F. Arsenic, cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in cattle from Galicia, NW Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 246, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mahajan, P.; Kaushal, J. Role of phytoremediation in reducing cadmium toxicity in soil and water. J. Toxicol. 2018, 2018, 4864365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Farid, M.; Shakoor, M.B.; Ehsan, S.; Ali, S.; Zubair, M.; Hanif, M.S. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of different plant species to Cd stress. Int. J. Chem. Biochem. Sci. 2013, 3, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  28. Raza, A.; Habib, M.; Kakavand, S.N.; Zahid, Z.; Zahra, N.; Sharif, R.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Phytoremediation of cadmium: Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms. Biology 2020, 9, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ogabiela, E.E.; Yebpella, G.G.; Adesina, O.B.; Udiba, U.U.; Ade-Ajayi, F.A.; Magomya, A.M.; Hammuel, C.; Gandu, I.; Mmereole, U.J.; Abdullahi, M. Assessment of metals levels in cow blood from cow’s grazed around Zango, Zaria and Challawa Industrial estate, Kano–Nigeria. J. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2011, 1, 69–73. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rashed, M.N.; Soltan, M.E. Animal hair as biological indicator for heavy metal pollution in urban and rural areas. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2005, 110, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chibuike, G.U.; Obiora, S.C. Heavy metal polluted soils: Effect on plants and bioremediation methods. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2014, 2014, 752708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ghoneim, M.M.; El-Desoky, H.S.; El-Moselhy, K.M.; Amer, A.; Abou El-Naga, E.H.; Mohamedein, L.I.; Al-Prol, A.E. Removal of cadmium from aqueous solution using marine green algae, Ulva lactuca. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2014, 40, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Thebo, A.L.; Drechsel, P.; Lambin, E.F. Global assessment of urban and peri-urban agriculture: Irrigated and rainfed croplands. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 114002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Courtney, R.G.; Mullen, G.J. Soil quality and barley growth as influenced by the land application of two compost types. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 2913–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shaheen, S.M.; Rinklebe, J.; Rupp, H.; Meissner, R. Temporal dynamics of pore water concentrations of Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, and Zn and their controlling factors in a contaminated floodplain soil assessed by undisturbed groundwater lysimeters. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 191, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ahmad, K.; Ashfaq, A.; Khan, Z.I.; Ashraf, M.; Akram, N.A.; Yasmin, S.; Noorka, I.R. Health risk assessment of heavy metals and metalloids via dietary intake of a potential vegetable (Coriandrum sativum L.) grown in contaminated water irrigated agricultural sites of Sargodha, Pakistan. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2016, 22, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yasotha, A.; Dabadé, D.S.; Singh, V.P.; Sivakumar, T. Risk assessment of heavy metals in milk from cows reared around industrial areas in India. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 43, 1799–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rehman, M.; Maqbool, Z.; Peng, D.; Liu, L. Morpho-physiological traits, antioxidant capacity and phytoextraction of copper by ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.) grown as fodder in copper-contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 5851–5861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rasheed, T.; Kausar, F.; Rizwan, K.; Adeel, M.; Sher, F.; Alwadai, N.; Alshammari, F.H. Two dimensional MXenes as emerging paradigm for adsorptive removal of toxic metallic pollutants from wastewater. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kodrik, L.; Wagner, L.; Imre, K.; Polyak, K.F.; Besenyei, F.; Husveth, F. The effect of highway traffic on heavy metal content of cow milk and cheese. Hung. J. Ind. Chem. 2011, 39, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, Z.; Weichenthal, S.; Kwong, J.C.; Burnett, R.T.; Hatzopoulou, M.; Jerrett, M.; van Donkelaar, A.; Bai, L.; Martin, R.V.; Copes, R.; et al. A population-based cohort study of respiratory disease and long-term exposure to iron and copper in fine particulate air pollution and their combined impact on reactive oxygen species generation in human lungs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 3807–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dobrzanski, Z.; Gorecka, H.; Kolacz, R.; Gorecki, H.J. Effect of pollution from copper industry on heavy metal concentration in green forage, blood serum and dairy cattle and in milk. In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Animal Hygiene, St. Paul, MN, USA, 12–16 September 1994; pp. 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  43. Miranda, M.; Lopez-Alonso, M.; Castillo, C.; Hernández, J.; Benedito, J.L. Effects of moderate pollution on toxic and trace metal levels in calves from a polluted area of northern Spain. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, F.; Saqlain, L.; Ma, J.; Khan, Z.I.; Ahmad, K.; Ashfaq, A.; Sultana, R.; Muhammad, F.G.; Maqsood, A.; Naeem, M.; et al. Evaluation of potential ecological risk and prediction of zinc accumulation and its transfer in soil plants and ruminants: Public health implications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 3386–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hussain, M.I.; Muscolo, A.; Farooq, M.; Ahmad, W. Sustainable use and management of nonconventional water resources for rehabilitation of marginal lands in arid and semiarid environments. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 221, 462–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hussain, M.I.; Abideen, Z.; Qureshi, A.S. Soil Degradation, Resilience, Restoration and Sustainable Use. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 52, pp. 335–365. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mühlbachová, G.; Simon, T.; Pechová, M. The availability of Cd, Pb and Zn and their relationships with soil pH and microbial biomass in soils amended by natural clinoptilolite. Plant Soil Environ. 2005, 51, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ali, A.I.M.; Sandi, S.; Riswandi, R. Heavy metals accumulation in forages and buffalo hair on flooded pasture in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 4137–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sathyamoorthy, K.; Sivaruban, T.; Barathy, S. Assesssment of heavy metal pollution and contaminants in cattle meat. J. Ind. Pollut. Control 2016, 32, 350–355. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rahman, A.; Jahanara, I.; Jolly, Y.N.; Akter, S.; Kabir, J.; Uddin, M.J.; Mamun, K.M.; Mohiuddin, A.S.M.; Rahman, M.K. Soil properties and pollution indices in four designated wetlands in the Sylhet basin of Bangladesh. Environ. Earth Sci. 2022, 81, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ge, X.; Chen, F.; Saqlain, L.; Ma, J.; Khan, Z.I.; Ahmad, K.; Malik, I.S.; Ashfaq, A.; Sultana, R.; Munir, M.; et al. Evaluation of pasture allowance of manganese for ruminants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 56906–56914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Muhammad, F.; Akhtar, M.; Javed, I.; Rahman, Z.U.; Jan, I.; Anwar, M.I.; Hayat, S. Quantitative structure activity relationship and risk analysis of some heavy metal residues in the milk of cattle and goat. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2009, 25, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) The concentration of heavy metal Cd in soil; (B) the concentration of heavy metal Cd in the forages; (C) the concentration of heavy metal Cu in soil; (D) the concentration of heavy metal Cu in the forages. Every bar represents the mean (±S.E.) of three replicates. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 1. (A) The concentration of heavy metal Cd in soil; (B) the concentration of heavy metal Cd in the forages; (C) the concentration of heavy metal Cu in soil; (D) the concentration of heavy metal Cu in the forages. Every bar represents the mean (±S.E.) of three replicates. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Sustainability 14 12595 g001
Table 1. Bioconcentration factor (BCF), pollution load index (PLI), and enrichment factor (EF) of Cd metal in soil.
Table 1. Bioconcentration factor (BCF), pollution load index (PLI), and enrichment factor (EF) of Cd metal in soil.
Site 1Site 2Site 3
BCF
Soil of S. bicolor0.9090.8711.019
Soil of C. dactylon0.8450.8711.033
Soil of S. fruticosa0.7891.0921.127
Soil of S. bispinosa0.9471.1381.685
Soil of T. terrestris0.8401.1310.801
PLI
S. bicolor0.7540.8320.768
C. dactylon0.7611.1041.068
S. fruticosa0.7640.9751.154
S. bispinosa0.7461.0320.98
T. terrestris0.761.0891.511
EF
S. bicolor6.7796.4917.589
C. dactylon6.2966.4867.699
S. fruticosa5.8838.1328.396
S. bispinosa7.0588.48112.552
T. terrestris6.2618.4275.971
Table 2. Concentrations of the heavy metal Cd in animal blood, hair, and feces. Each value represents the mean (±S.E.) of three replicates.
Table 2. Concentrations of the heavy metal Cd in animal blood, hair, and feces. Each value represents the mean (±S.E.) of three replicates.
SourceAnimalSite 1Site 2Site 3
BloodCow1.19 ± 0.271.78 ± 0.392.13 ± 0.34
Buffalo1.29 ± 0.281.76 ± 0.292.22 ± 0.41
Sheep0.99 ± 0.251.96 ± 0.351.61 ± 0.31
HairCow1.06 ± 0.192.02 ± 0.322.25 ± 0.41
Buffalo1.01 ± 0.281.83 ± 0.312.23 ± 0.54
Sheep1.14 ± 0.051.79 ± 0.352.34 ± 0.37
FecesCow0.66 ± 0.141.88 ± 0.322.19 ± 0.31
Buffalo2.03 ± 0.211.98 ± 0.352.16 ± 0.29
Sheep1.55 ± 0.352.12 ± 0.331.81 ± 0.31
Table 3. Daily intake of metal (DIM) and health risk index (HRI) for Cd.
Table 3. Daily intake of metal (DIM) and health risk index (HRI) for Cd.
DIM (Cd)CowBuffaloSheep
Site 1Site 2Site 3Site 1Site 2Site 3Site 1Site 2Site 3
S. bicolor0.00320.00350.00370.00370.00390.00420.00280.00290.0032
C. dactylon0.00310.00460.00520.00340.00520.00590.00270.00390.0045
S. fruticosa0.00290.00510.00620.00320.00580.00700.00250.00440.0054
S. bispinosa0.00340.00560.00790.00380.00630.00890.00290.00440.0069
T. terrestris0.00300.00590.00580.00350.00670.00650.00260.00510.0049
HRI (Cd)
S. bicolor3.2643.4513.7233.70913.92164.23072.82882.99093.2266
C. dactylon3.064.5735.2533.47735.19665.96932.6523.96334.5526
S. fruticosa2.8755.0666.1883.26475.75687.03182.48994.39055.3629
S. bispinosa3.3665.5937.9053.8256.35578.98292.91724.84736.851
T. terrestris3.5435.855.7633.45796.66486.54892.63735.0834.9946
Table 4. Bioconcentration factor (BCF) and pollution load index (PLI) enrichment factor (EF) of Cu metal in the soil.
Table 4. Bioconcentration factor (BCF) and pollution load index (PLI) enrichment factor (EF) of Cu metal in the soil.
Site 1Site 2Site 3
BCF
Soil of S. bicolor1.9172.3221.636
Soil of C. dactylon1.9562.0591.786
Soil of S. fruticosa2.3712.2132.118
Soil of S. bispinosa1.9292.2651.620
Soil of T. terrestris1.9691.9171.745
PLI
S. bicolor0.8720.8771.247
C. dactylon0.8331.041.225
S. fruticosa0.9620.9561.076
S. bispinosa0.8381.0081.274
T. terrestris0.7821.1441.325
EF
S. bicolor0.2190.2660.187
C. dactylon0.2240.2360.204
S. fruticosa0.2710.2530.242
S. bispinosa0.2210.2590.185
T. terrestris0.2250.2190.199
Table 5. Concentrations of the heavy metal Cu in animal blood, hair, and feces. Each value represents the mean (±S.E.) of three replicates.
Table 5. Concentrations of the heavy metal Cu in animal blood, hair, and feces. Each value represents the mean (±S.E.) of three replicates.
SourceAnimalSite 1Site 2Site 3
BloodCow3.15 ± 0.583.45 ± 0.243.86 ± 0.34
Buffalo2.07 ± 0.282.64 ± 0.202.88 ± 0.30
Sheep2.39 ± 0.293.23 ± 0.333.13 ± 0.29
HairCow2.76 ± 0.193.80 ± 0.313.67 ± 0.23
Buffalo2.05 ± 0.232.79 ± 0.363.27 ± 0.33
Sheep2.09 ± 0.212.90 ± 0.263.04 ± 0.35
FecesCow2.29 ± 0.173.52 ± 0.293.97 ± 0.30
Buffalo2.17 ± 0.192.88 ± 0.323.28 ± 0.35
Sheep2.25 ± 0.203.15 ± 0.322.89 ± 0.33
Table 6. Daily intake of metal (DIM) and health risk index (HRI) for Cu.
Table 6. Daily intake of metal (DIM) and health risk index (HRI) for Cu.
DIM (Cu)CowBuffaloSheep
Site 1Site 2Site 3Site 1Site 2Site 3Site 1Site 2Site 3
S. bicolor0.02380.02900.02910.02710.03300.03310.02070.02520.0252
C. dactylon0.02320.03070.03120.02640.03490.03550.02010.02660.0271
S. fruticosa0.03250.03020.03250.03690.03420.03690.02820.02620.0282
S. bispinosa0.02310.03260.02940.02620.03700.03350.01990.0280.0255
T. terrestris0.02190.03130.03290.02490.03550.03750.01900.02710.0286
HRI (Cu)
S. bicolor0.59630.72620.72720.67760.82520.82630.51680.62940.6302
C. dactylon0.58090.76670.78030.66020.87130.88670.50350.66450.6763
S. fruticosa0.8130.75440.8130.92390.85720.92390.70460.65380.7046
S. bispinosa0.57630.81430.73610.65490.92530.83650.49950.70570.6379
T. terrestris0.54910.7820.82450.62390.88860.93690.47590.67770.7146
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hussain, M.I.; Naeem, M.; Khan, Z.I.; Akhtar, S.; Nadeem, M.; Alnuwaiser, M.A.; Ahmad, K.; Vicente, O.; Yang, H.-H. Cadmium (Cd) and Copper (Cu) Exposure and Bioaccumulation Arrays in Farm Ruminants: Impact of Forage Ecotypes, Ecological Sites and Body Organs. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912595

AMA Style

Hussain MI, Naeem M, Khan ZI, Akhtar S, Nadeem M, Alnuwaiser MA, Ahmad K, Vicente O, Yang H-H. Cadmium (Cd) and Copper (Cu) Exposure and Bioaccumulation Arrays in Farm Ruminants: Impact of Forage Ecotypes, Ecological Sites and Body Organs. Sustainability. 2022; 14(19):12595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hussain, Muhammad Iftikhar, Majida Naeem, Zafar Iqbal Khan, Shahzad Akhtar, Muhammad Nadeem, Maha Abdallah Alnuwaiser, Kafeel Ahmad, Oscar Vicente, and Hsi-Hsien Yang. 2022. "Cadmium (Cd) and Copper (Cu) Exposure and Bioaccumulation Arrays in Farm Ruminants: Impact of Forage Ecotypes, Ecological Sites and Body Organs" Sustainability 14, no. 19: 12595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912595

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop