Next Article in Journal
Integrating Citizens’ Importance-Performance Aspects into Sustainable Plastic Waste Management in Danang, Vietnam
Next Article in Special Issue
Fluidization Roasting Technology of Jingtieshan Iron Ore in the Absence of Carbon Additives
Previous Article in Journal
Method for Assessing the Soundscape in a Marine Artificial Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Utilization of Siderite- and Hematite-Mixed Ore by Suspension Magnetization Roasting: A Pilot-Scale Study

1
College of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2
Institute of Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resource, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 10353; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610353
Submission received: 22 July 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022

Abstract

:
Steel is an important industrial raw material and plays an important role in industrial construction. Studying the efficient utilization of complex refractory iron ore with large reserves is of great significance to ensure the strategic safety of China’s iron and steel industry. Focusing on the typical mixed iron ore of siderite (FeCO3) and hematite (Fe2O3), this paper analyzes the possible ways of magnetization roasting from the perspective of thermodynamics and highlights that oxidation–reduction roasting is an easy way to realize industrial application. On this basis, a pilot-scale test of suspension magnetization roasting followed by low-intensity magnetic separation is carried out by using a newly developed suspension magnetization roasting furnace. The effects of roasting temperature, CO consumption, and N2 consumption on the magnetization roasting process are investigated, and 24 h continuous tests are carried out. Here, we find continuous suspension magnetization roasting followed by low-intensity magnetic separation can obtain a total iron grade of over 56% with an average value of 57.18% and a total iron recovery rate of over 91% with an average value of 92.22%. Product analysis shows that after SMR, iron minerals such as siderite and hematite transform into magnetite, with a substantial increase in magnetism, which is conducive to the separation of iron ore. The results provide a reference for the development and utilization of siderite- and hematite-mixed iron ore.

1. Introduction

Mineral resources are an important material basis for national economic construction and social development. According to statistics, about 80% of the raw materials, 95% of the energy, 70% of the means of agricultural production, and more than 30% of the drinking water required by social production come from mineral resources. Among the many mineral resources, iron ore resources were the earliest discovered, and they are the most widely used and most consumed mineral resources [1,2]. In recent years, the rapid development of the iron and steel industry has increased demand for a large amount of iron ore. China is a country with many poor mines and few rich mines. According to the data provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the average grade of iron ore in the world is 46.67%, while the average grade of iron ore in China is only about 30%, far below the world average. Therefore, in China, a large number of experts study the efficient utilization of complex and refractory iron ore resources.
Siderite is an important iron ore resource in China, with proven reserves of 1.83 billion tons, accounting for 3.4% of the proven reserves of iron ore [3]. Because the maximum grade of siderite is low (about 48%) and often coexists with calcium, magnesium, and manganese, it is difficult to obtain good beneficiation indexes by physical beneficiation methods [4]. Low-intensity magnetic separation (LIMS) after magnetization roasting is an effective method to treat siderite [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. In this process, weakly magnetic siderite and mixed hematite or limonite can be chemically converted into magnetite or magneto hematite, which is suitable for recovery using LIMS [14,15,16]. Common magnetization roasting methods include shaft furnace magnetization roasting, rotary kiln magnetization roasting, and fluidization magnetization roasting. The grain size of shaft furnace magnetization roasting is 75~15 mm, whereas that of rotary kiln magnetization roasting is 25~0 mm. Shaft furnace magnetization roasting is associated with high energy consumption and low roasting efficiency, and the roasting products are prone to under-roasting or over-roasting, resulting in a low roasting economy [17,18,19]. Although rotary kiln magnetization roasting can handle full-size samples, it has the problem of ring formation, which leads to low equipment operation rates [20,21]. At the same time, the roasting energy consumption of rotary kiln magnetization roasting is also relatively high, which reduces its application. The smaller the particle size of the ore block, the larger its specific surface area, the less time required for magnetization roasting reaction, and the more uniform the reduction ore. Fluidized magnetization roasting of powder particles is an efficient roasting method, and it has the following advantages [22,23]: (1) particles are mostly suspended in the gas phase in a good dispersion state, which can facilitate full contact between a gas and solid, and the product quality is uniform and stable; (2) the reaction speed is fast, the heat and mass transfer effect in the reaction process is good, and the heat consumption is low; (3) the temperature and air flow are evenly distributed, easy to control, and possess a high automation level; (4) the equipment has few moving parts, low maintenance costs, and can be easily adjusted. In recent years, fluidized magnetization roasting has been widely studied. In particular, the innovative suspension magnetization roasting (SMR) technology and equipment developed by the Han research team of Northeast University of China have been applied in the Jiuquan Iron and Steel Group, realizing significant technological progress in the efficient utilization of refractory iron ore [24,25,26,27,28]. This process can not only convert the refractory weak magnetic separation iron ore into easily dressed strong magnetic iron ore but also further improve the quality of iron concentrate and iron recovery.
The purpose of this study is to consider the use of new suspension magnetization roasting technology to recover iron from the mixed ore of siderite and hematite. The roasting temperature, CO, and N2 flow rates were considered and optimized. In addition, a 24 h continuous stable suspension magnetization roasting test was carried out under optimal roasting conditions. Finally, the roasting products were analyzed to further verify the roasting theory and test results.

2. Materials and Experimental Procedure

2.1. Materials

The main chemical composition and iron phase composition of the samples were analyzed by means of chemical analysis, shown in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. The results show that the total iron (TFe) grade was 35.68%, mainly in the forms of siderite, accounting for 71.16%, followed by hematite, accounting for 25.27%, and a small amount of iron in the form of magnetite, ferric sulfide, and ferric silicate existed. SiO2 was the main impurity element, and the contents of harmful elements P and S were 0.10% and 0.36%, respectively. (CaO + MgO)/(SiO2 + Al2O3) < 0.5, indicating that the ore was acidic.
The mineral phase composition and content were analyzed using the Mineral Liberation Analyzer (MLA, developed by the JK mineralogy research center, University of Queensland, Australia), as shown in Table 3. The results show that siderite and hematite were the main recycled minerals, with contents of 51.20% and 9.60%, respectively. The gangue minerals were quartz or chalcedony, mica, chlorite, and kaolinite, with contents of 12.56%, 5.30%, 4.45% and 2.38%, respectively. There was also a small amount of apatite, calcite, pyrite and dolomite.
In suspension magnetization roasting, the ore is heated by burning liquefied gas. CO is the reducing gas, and N2 is the fluidizing gas.

2.2. Experimental Method

The pilot-scale test system (Figure 1) is composed of a feeding system, preheating system, dust collector, reduction system, cooling system, and a central control system. The raw material is preheated using a cyclone preheating (P02) system. Then, the ore enters the heating system (P04), which contains a strong oxidizing atmosphere. After reaching the predetermined temperature, the ore travels under the action of gravity into the reduction system (P05), where there is a strong reducing atmosphere. The material then stays in the reduction system for a certain amount of time before entering the fluidization cooling system (C01). The cooled material is mixed and condensed for magnetic separation. Power for the system comes from the roots blower, and the heat source mainly comes from liquefied gas combustion. The reaction temperature is adjustable between 500 °C and 650 °C. The feeding speed is fixed at 110 kg/h. The reductant is high-purity CO, and the CO concentration is adjusted with N2 gas flow.
The roasted products are ground to less than 45 μm (pass rate 90%) using a small mill and then separated using a low-intensity magnetic separator. The 24 h continuous stability test is carried out under the optimal conditions. Before the test is started, the fluidized bed temperature should reach the optimal temperature. The roasting products are sampled every 2 h, and then magnetic separation is carried out using a magnetic field intensity of 119.37 kA/m.

3. Thermodynamic Basis for SMR

Magnetite has good magnetism, which makes it easy to obtain high-grade iron concentrate through magnetic separation. Hematite, siderite, limonite, and other weakly magnetic minerals usually need other means to improve their iron concentrate grade, such as flotation or magnetization roasting [29,30]. Magnetization roasting is a process of transforming weak magnetic iron minerals into strong magnetic iron minerals. Limonite is transformed into hematite after dehydration, and hematite reacts in a reducing atmosphere to form strongly magnetic magnetite. The main chemical reactions are as follows:
Fe 2 O 3 · H 2 O Fe 2 O 3 +   H 2 O   Δ G T   θ = 49,171 152.40 T  
3 α - Fe 2 O 3 +   CO 2 Fe 3 O 4 + CO 2     Δ G T θ = 52,130 41.0 T
There are three magnetization roasting methods for siderite: neutral roasting, weak oxidation roasting, and oxidation-reduction roasting. The main chemical reactions of siderite during suspension roasting are as follows:
(1)
Neutral roasting
Heated siderite decomposes in a neutral atmosphere; Reaction (3) is as follows:
FeCO 3 FeO + CO 2   Δ G T θ = 74,893 180.77 T
The initial temperature of Reaction (3) is 141 °C, and FeO is oxidized at temperatures above 570 °C due to the instability of FeO.
When the temperature is below 570 °C, Reaction (4) occurs:
4 FeO Fe + Fe 3 O 4   Δ G T θ   = 48,540 + 57.37
Joint Reaction (3) and Reaction (4), give Reaction (5):
4 FeCO 3 Fe + Fe 3 O 4 + 4 CO 2   Δ G T θ = 251,032   -   665 . 71 T
When the temperature is above 570 °C, Reaction (6) occurs:
3 FeO + CO 2 Fe 3 O 4 + CO   Δ G T   θ = 35,380 + 40.16 T
Joint Reaction (3) and Reaction (6) give Reaction (7):
3 FeCO 3 Fe 3 O 4 + CO + 2 CO 2   Δ G T θ   = 39,513 140.61 T
(2)
Weak oxidation roasting
It can be seen from Reaction (7) that the chemical equilibrium shifts to the right when the CO content is lower. Therefore, the introduction of a small amount of O2 can reduce the CO content and increase the CO2 content.
2 CO + O 2 2 CO 2   Δ G T θ = 561,900 + 170.46 T  
At the same time, oxygen can also react with FeO to give Reaction (9):
6 FeO + O 2 2 Fe 3 O 4   Δ G T θ = 774,180 + 411.42 T  
Above 400 °C, γ-Fe2O3 is transformed to α-Fe2O3 [31]. In an oxidation environment with temperatures higher than 400 °C, Fe3O4 will also be oxidized, and Reaction (10) occurs:
4 Fe 3 O 4 + O 2 6 α - Fe 2 O 3   Δ G T   θ = 457,640 + 252.46 T  
When the temperature is below 400 °C, Reaction (11) occurs:
4 Fe 3 O 4 + O 2 6 γ - Fe 2 O 3   Δ G T θ   = 453,626 + 256.67 T
After introducing a small amount of oxygen to a neutral atmosphere, the main reaction of Reactions (8)–(11) can be identified from the Ellingham diagram of these reactions (Figure 2).
The lower the position of the reaction in the Ellingham diagram, the more easily the reaction occurs. As can be seen from Figure 2, Reactions (8) and (9) intersect at 608 °C, so when t < 608 °C, Reaction (9) is the dominant reaction, and when t > 608 °C, Reaction (8) is the dominant reaction. Reactions (8) and (9) do not intersect at 400 °C, which may be due to the fitting of Gibbs free energy to Δ G T θ = A+BT form, but this does not affect our judgment on the reaction trend. Reactions (8) and (9) are lower than Reactions (10) and (11), indicating that Fe3O4 is not easily oxidized without excessive oxygen.
Therefore, the total reaction equation of FeCO3 roasting in a weak oxidizing atmosphere is:
6 FeCO 3 + O 2 2 Fe 3 O 4 + 6 CO 2   Δ G T θ = 54,137 112.20 T  
(3)
Oxidation–reduction roasting
The siderite is oxidized to weak magnetic α-Fe2O3 in a strong oxidizing atmosphere. α-Fe2O3 is then reduced to Fe3O4 in a reductive environment. Reaction (13) is shown below followed by Reaction (2):
4 FeCO 3 + O 2 2 α - Fe 2 O 3 + 4 CO 2   Δ G T θ = 369,095 364.65 T  
The roasting of siderite-containing refractory iron ore in a neutral or weak oxidizing atmosphere needs to be strictly controlled and may change with variations in hematite content. However, the oxidation–reduction roasting of siderite can easily be realized in industry due to the ease of performing oxidation followed by reduction.
A feasible path is as follows: combined with the characteristics of the new suspension magnetization roasting furnace, siderite–hematite-mixed ore is first heated in a strong oxidizing atmosphere, where it is convenient to control the full combustion of fuel. It is then placed in a reducing atmosphere so that it can be unified into strongly magnetic magnetite, and, then, low-intensity magnetic separation can be utilized to obtain high-quality iron concentrate.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Effect of the Roasting Temperature

Roast temperature is a key factor influencing roasting efficiency. The higher the roasting temperature, the faster the reaction rate. The suspension roasting temperature is adjusted by controlling the liquefied gas supply to the combustion station. Figure 3 shows the effect of roasting temperature on suspension roasting performance at a CO gas flow rate of 4.5 Nm3/h and a N2 gas flow rate of 0 Nm3/h.
As shown in Figure 3, as the roasting temperature increases from 495 °C to 540 °C, the TFe grade of iron concentrate increases from 53.64% to 55.12%, and the iron recovery rate increases from 89.21% to 94.15%. This is because as the temperature increases, the reaction rate accelerates and the reaction becomes more efficient. However, if the roasting temperature continues to rise, the TFe grade and recovery rate of iron concentrate somewhat decrease, which may be attributed to the sample temperature being too high to cool down quickly and then becoming oxidized by air again. Through comprehensive analysis, it is estimated that the most efficient roasting temperature lies between 525 °C and 540 °C.

4.2. Effect of CO Consumption

CO is used as a reduction gas in suspension roasting. CO consumption impacts the reduction effect, where reduction is more efficient when the CO volume is optimal. However, an excessive CO volume will lead to further reduction of magnetite to FeO, which has poor magnetic properties, thus reducing the recovery efficiency of magnetic separation. Figure 4 displays the effect of CO consumption on suspension roasting performance at 525 °C and a N2 flow rate 0 Nm3/h.
At 110 kg/h, the theoretical dosage of CO required is 3.54 Nm3/h (calculated according to Reactions (11) and (12)). As shown in Figure 4, with an increase in CO consumption from 3.5 Nm3/h to 5.5 Nm3/h, the TFe grade of iron concentrate increased from 54.58% to 56.01%. The iron recovery rate initially increased and then decreased. This may be due to the increase in reducing gas, which led to less residence time of materials in the reactor, thus affecting the iron recovery rate. Hence, the optimal CO consumption was determined to be 4.5 Nm3/h, with TFe grade and TFe recovery rates of iron concentrate are 54.82% and 92.46%, respectively. Under such conditions, the excess coefficient of CO is 27%, with the excess CO being introduced into the furnace for combustion, ensuring safety, and saving energy.

4.3. Effect of N2 Consumption

The gas flow rate will affect the fluidization state in the reactor, thus affecting the residence time of particles in the reactor. Under the conditions of higher than the critical fluidization speed and an increased gas flow rate, the fluidization state in the reactor will change from scattered to aggregated fluidization. Following this, a pneumatic conveying system will be formed [32]. In this reactor, the state of the fluidized bed is either a scattered or an agglomerated fluidized bed. N2 is used to regulate the fluidization state in the reactor to obtain better test results. Figure 5 displays the effect of N2 consumption on suspension roasting performance under the roasting conditions of 525 °C and CO consumption of 4.5 Nm3/h.
The experimental results are shown in Figure 5, where an increase in N2 consumption leads to an decrease in the recovery rates of iron concentrate from 93.74% to 92.60%. This phenomenon may have resulted from the reduction in residence time due to the increase in N2 flow. The iron concentrate TFe grade increased from 54.66% to 56.13% and then decreased to 54.7%. Therefore, an appropriate flow rate of nitrogen was determined at 1 m3/h. In this way, not only can the material maintain a good fluidization state, but it can also ensure a long residence time.

4.4. 24 h Continuous Suspension Magnetization Roasting Test

To verify the quality and stability of products yielded from suspension roasting, a pilot-scale continuous stability test was carried out with the following conditions: reduction temperature of 525~540 °C, CO consumption of 4.5 Nm3/h, and N2 consumption of 1 Nm3/h. Subsequently, a continuous stability operation was performed for 24 h, sampling every 2 h.
The test results are presented in Figure 6. Continuous suspension roasting can obtain an iron concentrate TFe grade of more than 56%, (average value of 57.18%) and an TFe recovery rate of more than 91% (average value of 92.22%), indicating that continuous suspension roasting produces good stability.

4.5. Property Analysis of Roasting Products

4.5.1. Chemical Analysis of Roasting Products

The chemical analysis of iron ore suspension roasting–magnetic separation products is presented in Table 4. Compared with Table 1, TFe increased from 35.68% to 45.10% after roasting, which was attributed to carbon loss in siderite and oxygen loss in hematite. After magnetic separation, the grade of magnetic concentrate was 57.18%, and the grade of tailings was 12.31%, indicating that the iron ore after roasting was effectively separated. This is attributed to the transformation of siderite and hematite into magnetite after suspension roasting.

4.5.2. Iron Phase Analysis

The results of iron phase analysis for the suspended roasting–magnetic separation products are shown in Table 5. Compared with Table 2, iron mainly exists in magnetite in roasted products with a distribution rate of 93.72%, followed by hematite and siderite with distribution rates of 3.40% and 2.26%, respectively. This suggests that iron ore is converted into magnetite after suspension roasting. The content of magnetite in magnetic concentrate was 55.13%, with a distribution rate of 97.20%. The content of siderite, hematite, and magnetite in tailings was 4.63%, 3.94% and 3.47%, respectively, further indicating that the phase transformation of iron ore occurs in the process of suspension roasting.

4.5.3. Phase Transformations of Roasted Products

XRD patterns of the products roasted at different temperatures for continuous stability are shown in Figure 7. Compared with the raw ore, it is evident that there is no diffraction peak for siderite in the roasting products, whereas diffraction peaks for both magnetite and hematite are observed. This indicates that the siderite presenting in the raw ore was transformed into magnetite. This is seen in all the XRD curves of roasted products obtained at different roasting temperatures. The largest diffraction peaks of magnetite were observed when roasted at 525 °C. The diffraction peaks for quartz did not change, indicating that there was no phase change of quartz during the roasting process.

4.5.4. Magnetic Performance of the Iron Ore before and after SMR

The magnetic properties of raw ore and roasting products were tested, and the results were shown in Figure 8. The specific magnetization of the raw ore is nearly a straight line, indicating that the raw ore is a weak magnetic mineral. The magnetization of roasted products increased significantly with the increase in magnetic field strength. At a magnetic field strength of 30.97 kA/m, the maximum specific magnetization was 4.995 × 10−4 m3/kg. This demonstrates that suspension roasting enhances the magnetic properties of minerals, which is beneficial to iron ore separation.

5. Conclusions

(1)
After suspension magnetization roasting, the TFe grade of raw material increased from 35.68% to 45.10%. After magnetic separation, iron concentrate with a TFe grade of 57.18% and tailings with a TFe grade of 12.31% were obtained. In total, 93.72% of the iron in the roasted product existed as magnetite, and the value in the iron concentrate was 97.20%.
(2)
The new suspension roaster is suitable for processing siderite–hematite-mixed ore. The continuous test results of the 24 h pilot-scale demonstrated that suspension roasting is stable. Under the conditions of a roasting temperature of 525–540 °C, a CO consumption of 4.5 Nm3/h, and a N2 consumption 1 Nm3/h, a TFe grade of over 56% with an average value of 57.18% and an iron recovery rate of over 91% with an average value of 92.22% were obtained.
(3)
The analysis of suspension magnetization roasting products demonstrated that after suspension magnetization roasting, magnetism is significantly enhanced, and siderite, hematite, and other weak magnetic minerals are transformed into strong magnetic magnetite.
The test results show that suspension magnetization roasting followed by magnetic separation is an effective method for treating siderite–hematite-mixed iron ore.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, Y.L. (Yingzhi Liu); Resources, Y.L. (Yachuan Liu); Validation, Y.Z.; Visualization, Y.H.; Writing—original draft, C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Sichuan Science and Technology Plan Project, grant number [2019YFS0452], China Geological Survey Project, grant number [DD20221697].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China ”2021YFC2902400” and China Geological Survey Project “DD20221697”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Quast, K. A review on the characterisation and processing of oolitic iron ores. Miner. Eng. 2018, 126, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lu, L. Important iron ore characteristics and their impacts on sinter quality—A review. Min. Metall. Explor. 2015, 32, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, D.; Luo, Y.; Pan, J.; Zhou, X. Reaction mechanism of siderite lump in coal-based direct reduction. High Temp. Mater. Process. 2016, 35, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, Q.; Xue, J.; Chen, W. Upgrading of iron concentrate by fluidized-bed magnetizing roasting of siderite to magnetite in CO–H2–N2 atmosphere. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2019, 72, 1381–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bai, S.; Wen, S.; Liu, D.; Zhang, W.; Xian, Y. Catalyzing carbothermic reduction of sider-ite ore with high content of phosphorus by adding sodium carbonate. ISIJ Int. 2011, 51, 1601–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chun, T.; Zhu, D.; Pan, J. Simultaneously roasting and magnetic separation to treat low grade siderite and hematite ores, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2015, 36, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chao, L.; Sun, H.H.; Bai, J.; Li, L.T. Innovative methodology for comprehensive utilization of iron ore tailings: Part 1. The recovery of iron from iron ore tailings using magnetic separation after magnetizing roasting. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174, 71–77. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, Y.; Zhu, T. Recovery of low grade hematite via fluidized bed magnetising roasting: Investigation of magnetic properties and liberation characteristics. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2012, 39, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, G.; Zhang, L.B.; Peng, J.H.; Hu, T.; Yang, L. Microwave roasting of siderite and the cata-lytic combustion effects on anthracite. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 117, 668–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ponomar, V.P.; Dudchenko, N.O.; Brik, A.B. Synthesis of magnetite powder from the mixture consisting of siderite and hematite iron ores. Miner. Eng. 2018, 122, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rath, S.S.; Sahoo, H.; Dhawan, N.; Rao, D.S.; Das, B.; Mishra, B.K. Optimal recovery of iron values from a low grade iron ore using reduction roasting and magnetic separation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 1927–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, Y.S.; Zhu, X.R.; Han, Y.X.; Li, Y.J. Green magnetization roasting technology for refractory iron ore using siderite as a reductant. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 206, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, X.L.; Han, Y.X.; Li, Y.J.; Sun, Y.S. Effect of heating rate on pyrolysis behavior and kinetic characteristics of siderite. Minerals 2017, 7, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, D.Q.; Zhao, Q.; Qiu, G.Z.; Pan, J.; Wang, Z.; Pan, C. Magnetizing roasting-magnetic separation of limonite ores from Anhui Province in east China. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing 2010, 32, 713–718. [Google Scholar]
  15. Alavifard, N.; Shalchian, H.; Rafsanjani-Abbasi, A.; Vahdati Khaki, J.; Babakhani, A. Recovery of iron from low-grade hematite ore using coal-based direct reduction followed by magnetic separation. Iran. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 13, 60–71. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, S.; Xue, X.; Liu, X.; Duan, P.; Yang, H.; Jiang, T.; Wang, D.; Liu, R. Current situation and comprehensive utilization of iron ore tailing resources. J. Min. Sci. 2006, 42, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yan, A.; Chai, T.; Yu, W. Multi-objective evaluation-based hybrid intelligent control optimization for shaft furnace roasting process. Control. Eng. Pract. 2012, 20, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Matyukhin, V.I.; Shatsillo, V.V.; Kuznetsov, A.V.; Rybakin, D.V.; Krokhalev, A.F. Evaluating the thermal efficiency of a shaft furnace for roasting siderite ore. Metallurgist 2017, 61, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yur’ev, B.P.; Dudko, V.A.; Shageeva, A. Kinetics of Siderite Ore Roasting in the Shaft Furnace; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Bäch, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 946, pp. 456–461. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fu, X.; Mao, Y.; Xue, S. Study on Formation and prevention of kiln-ringing in large-scale industrial rotary kiln roasting. Nonferrous Met. 2013, 4, 236–239. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Xue, S.; Chen, Q.; Mao, Y. Industrial experimental research on magnetization roasting for low-grade siderite and limonite in Rotary Kiln. Min. Metall. Eng. 2010, 30, 29–32. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Feilmayr, C.; Thurnhofer, A.; Winter, F.; Mali, H.; Schenk, J. Reduction behavior of hematite to magnetite under fluidized bed conditions. ISIJ Int. 2004, 44, 1125–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Musun, G. Fluidized roasting of oxidic Chinese iron ores. Sci. Sin. 1979, 11, 1265–1291. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yu, J.; Han, Y.; Li, Y.; Gao, P. Beneficiation of an iron ore fines by magnetization roasting and magnetic separation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2017, 168, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, J.; Han, Y.; Li, Y.; Gao, P. Recovery and separation of iron from iron ore using innovative fluidized magnetization roasting and magnetic separation. J. Min. Metall. 2018, 54, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, X.; Han, Y.; Sun, Y.; Lv, Y.; Li, Y.; Tang, Z. An novel method for iron recovery from iron ore tailings with pre-concentration followed by magnetization roasting and magnetic separation. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2020, 41, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.J.; Wang, R.; Han, Y.X.; Wei, X.C. Phase transformation in suspension roasting of oolitic hematite ore. J. Cent. South Univ. 2015, 22, 4560–4565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, J.W.; Han, Y.X.; Li, Y.J.; Gao, P.; Sun, Y.S. Separation and recovery of iron from a low—Grade carbonate-bearing iron ore using magnetizing roasting followed by magnetic separation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2017, 10, 1768–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Quast, K.B. A review of hematite flotation using 12-carbon chain collectors. Miner. Eng. 2000, 13, 1361–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ponomar, V.P.; Dudchenko, N.O.; Brik, A.B. Reduction roasting of hematite to magnetite using carbohydrates. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2017, 164, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kachi, S.; Momiyama, K.; Shimizu, S. An electron diffraction study and a theory of the transformation from γ-Fe2O3 to α-Fe2O3. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1963, 18, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kwauk, M.; Li, J.; Liu, D. Particulate and aggregative fluidization—50 years in retrospect. Powder Technol. 2000, 111, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure diagram of suspension magnetization roasting furnace.
Figure 1. Structure diagram of suspension magnetization roasting furnace.
Sustainability 14 10353 g001
Figure 2. Ellingham diagram of siderite oxidation roasting intermediate product.
Figure 2. Ellingham diagram of siderite oxidation roasting intermediate product.
Sustainability 14 10353 g002
Figure 3. Roasting temperature test results.
Figure 3. Roasting temperature test results.
Sustainability 14 10353 g003
Figure 4. CO consumption test results.
Figure 4. CO consumption test results.
Sustainability 14 10353 g004
Figure 5. N2 consumption test results.
Figure 5. N2 consumption test results.
Sustainability 14 10353 g005
Figure 6. Separation indexes for continuous and stable operation experiment.
Figure 6. Separation indexes for continuous and stable operation experiment.
Sustainability 14 10353 g006
Figure 7. XRD patterns of products roasted at different temperatures.
Figure 7. XRD patterns of products roasted at different temperatures.
Sustainability 14 10353 g007
Figure 8. Magnetic analysis of iron ore.
Figure 8. Magnetic analysis of iron ore.
Sustainability 14 10353 g008
Table 1. Multi-component analysis of iron ore sample (mass fraction, %).
Table 1. Multi-component analysis of iron ore sample (mass fraction, %).
ComponentTFeFeOPSSiO2Al2O3CaO
Counts35.6833.780.100.3620.733.231.22
ComponentMgOK2ONa2OH2O+total Cburning loss
Counts1.210.140.0601.616.5121.05
Table 2. Iron phase analysis of iron ore sample (mass fraction, %).
Table 2. Iron phase analysis of iron ore sample (mass fraction, %).
Iron PhaseFe in
Magnetite
Fe in
Hematite
Fe in
Carbonate
Fe in
Sulfide
Fe in
Silicate
Total
Content 0.878.9925.320.2630.13735.58
Percentage2.4525.2771.160.740.39100.00
Table 3. Mineral composition and contents of the ore (mass fraction, %).
Table 3. Mineral composition and contents of the ore (mass fraction, %).
MineralsCountsMineralsCounts
Siderite51.20Maolinite2.38
Hematite9.60Pyrite0.43
Mixture of iron ore and chlorite 13.38Apatite0.30
Quartz or chalcedony12.56Calcite0.20
Mica5.30Dolomite0.18
Chlorite4.45Others0.02
Table 4. Chemical analysis of suspension roasting–magnetic separation products (%).
Table 4. Chemical analysis of suspension roasting–magnetic separation products (%).
SampleTFePSSiO2Al2O3CaOMgOK2ONa2OMnO2
Roasted product45.100.150.3126.973.971.691.770.130.071.30
Concentrate57.180.130.3512.422.372.281.970.070.061.66
tailings12.310.160.1669.648.711.040.720.450.100.16
Table 5. Phase analysis results of roasted products (%).
Table 5. Phase analysis results of roasted products (%).
SampleFe in
Hematite
Fe in
Carbonate
Fe in
Sulfide
Fe in
Silicate
Fe in
Magnetite
Total
Roasted
product
Count1.021.540.0320.2542.3945.232
Distribution2.263.40.070.5593.72100.00
ConcentrateDistribution0.390.790.0180.3955.1356.718
Count0.691.390.030.6997.20100.00
tailingsCount4.633.940.0560.0143.4712.11
Distribution38.2332.540.460.1228.65100.00
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.; Han, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y. Efficient Utilization of Siderite- and Hematite-Mixed Ore by Suspension Magnetization Roasting: A Pilot-Scale Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610353

AMA Style

Chen C, Han Y, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu Y. Efficient Utilization of Siderite- and Hematite-Mixed Ore by Suspension Magnetization Roasting: A Pilot-Scale Study. Sustainability. 2022; 14(16):10353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Chao, Yuexin Han, Yushu Zhang, Yachuan Liu, and Yingzhi Liu. 2022. "Efficient Utilization of Siderite- and Hematite-Mixed Ore by Suspension Magnetization Roasting: A Pilot-Scale Study" Sustainability 14, no. 16: 10353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610353

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop