Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Development in Higher Engineering Education: A Comparative Study between Private and Public Polytechnics
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing Gridded Precipitation and Air Temperature Products in the Ayakkum Lake, Central Asia
Previous Article in Journal
L2 Motivational Self System, International Posture and the Sustainable Development of L2 Proficiency in the COVID-19 Era: A Case of English Majors in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrochemical Characteristics and the Relationship between Surface and Groundwater in a Typical ‘Mountain–Oasis’ Ecosystem in Central Asia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Grain Size and Sedimentary Sorting Characteristics of Atmospheric Dust in the Cele Oasis, Southern Margin of Taklimakan Desert

1
School of History and Geography, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363500, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
3
College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
4
Taklimakan Desert Meteorology Field Experiment Station of CMA, Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(13), 8093; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138093
Submission received: 12 March 2022 / Revised: 26 June 2022 / Accepted: 29 June 2022 / Published: 1 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oasis Resources Environment and Sustainable Development)

Abstract

:
Grain size is a proxy indicator of airflow intensity and also provides a scientific basis for the prevention of dust hazards. However, the variations in grain size characteristics that occur during transport and deposition processes are seldom discussed. Here, atmospheric dust samples were collected before and after deposition in a sand–dust storm for grain size analysis. The results showed that the grain size distributions of the atmospheric dust were unimodal during transportation but always became bimodal after deposition. This indicates that the bimodal grain size distribution of the aeolian deposits was caused by sedimentary sorting. The coarse-grained component, which was between 20 and 200 μm, was mainly deposited during the sand–dust storm. Grain size may indicate the strength of the airflow field. The fine-grained component, which ranged in size from 0.4 to 20 μm, was mainly deposited after the sand–dust storm. This component can remain suspended in the atmosphere for a long period of time. Oasis shelterbelts can be used to reduce the fine-grained component of the dust aerosol through the interception of particles by foliage. The grain size variation found in this study from before to after sand–dust storm deposition deepens our understanding of the sediment sorting process.

1. Introduction

The sustainable development of oases is crucial to maintaining social stability and economic development in arid areas, and aeolian processes seriously affect the environmental quality, human health, and sedimentary evolution of oases. Therefore, studying the grain size characteristics of modern atmospheric dust in oasis areas would facilitate the interpretation of a considerable amount of environmental information, such as dust sources, transportation dynamics, and deposition processes, and also help to control the hazards associated with aeolian activities and improve air quality. Such studies have important theoretical and practical significance that could improve the well-being of oasis residents.
Previous studies have focused on dust transport and deposition processes and their grain size characteristics in oasis areas. There are three main ways to restrict sand and dust from an oasis area: windbreaks, sand fixation, and dust retention. The oasis edge protection system and the inner shelter forest grid play important roles as windbreaks and are necessary for sand fixation [1]. In addition, the microclimate effect caused by oasis vegetation can accelerate dust deposition inside the oasis [1,2]. Leaves with different surface characteristics exhibit the selective retention of atmospheric particles [3,4]. In particular, the large leaf area and rough leaf surface of oasis vegetation play a role in the retention of atmospheric dust and improve air quality [4]. Therefore, analyzing the grain size characteristics of modern atmospheric dust in combination with the leaf dust retention characteristics can enhance our understanding of the role of vegetation in alleviating dust pollution and improving the environmental quality in oases.
Atmospheric dust exhibits specific grain size characteristics after being transported and sorted [5]. These can be characterized by a series of parameters, including the grain size distribution, grain size parameters (mean grain size, sorting, kurtosis, and skewness), and C–M figure (the C value is the grain size corresponding to 1% of the cumulative curve (the coarsest grain size) and M is the grain size corresponding to the 50% value (median size)). These parameters can be used to identify the sources, discriminate the formation environment, and reconstruct the paleoenvironmental change sequence [6,7,8].
Aeolian deposits are reputed to be excellent geological archives that contain significant environmental information. As an important proxy indicator for the strength of the regional airflow field, the grain size of aeolian deposits, especially loess deposits, is now used widely to obtain regional environmental information [8,9]. A specific size class is usually chosen as a direct proxy indicator [8,9,10,11,12]. Moreover, mathematical models have been used to extract proxy indicators, such as by end-member modeling [13,14], the granularity–standard deviation method [15], etc. Nevertheless, the grain size change characteristics of atmospheric dust from before to after deposition can facilitate a deep understanding of the depositional processes.
In this study, the grain size characteristics of atmospheric dust collected before and after deposition were analyzed to reveal the relationships among aeolian activities and the grain size characteristics of dustfall in an oasis region and provide a theoretical basis for maximizing the effects on preventing dust hazards by oasis shelterbelts.

2. Study Area

This study was carried out in the Cele Oasis (36°57′–37°5′ N, 80°43′–80°53′ E), southern edge of the Taklimakan Desert, which is located on the piedmont alluvium and diluvial fan of the Kunlun Mountains (Figure 1). The region has a warm temperate continental arid climate. The annual average temperature is 11.9 °C, the extreme maximum temperature is 41.9 °C, and the extreme minimum temperature is −23.9 °C [16,17]. Precipitation is very limited. The average annual precipitation is about 35 mm; the average annual potential evaporation is 2600 mm; and the value of the drought index, defined as the ratio of the possible evaporation from the water surface at a certain time to the precipitation at the same place during the same period, is 20.8 [18,19]. The water is mainly supplied from the ice and snow melt and mountain precipitation in the Kunlun Mountains. Strong westward winds together with frequent sand–dust storms prevail in spring and summer [2,20]. The average annual sand–dust weather accounts for 142.4 days of the year, of which there are 21.2 sand–dust storm days and up to 49 days in the maximum frequency year (1960) [21]. The oasis ecosystem is well developed, but the Cele Oasis is located on the edge of the desert, and regional wind–sand activities are frequent and intense.

3. Study Methods

Dust particles do not complete sedimentary sorting until they settle to the ground. We collected atmospheric dust before and after deposition to understand the sorting of the atmospheric dust in the deposition process. The aeolian deposit samples were collected by dust traps, which were made of polyvinyl chloride pipes with an inner diameter of 15 cm and a height of 30 cm according to the Chinese national standard (GB/T 15265-94). To avoid the impact of local saltating particles, the dust traps were placed on shelves at a height of 3.5 m at eight sites (Figure 1), and all of them were located in an open area without tall trees, buildings, or other obstructions at the edge of an oasis shelterbelt. Atmospheric dust was collected by total suspended particulate sampler (TSP). The TSP was also placed in an open area. We collected sand–dust storm samples at eight locations (WE4–WE11) on 8 May 2011 (T1) and two locations (CB-1–CB-2) in Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystem in the study area on 28 July 2011 (T2) (Figure 1), and also collected one atmospheric dust sample in the area on 28 July 2011 (AD1).
Grain sizes of all samples were measured using a laser grain size analyzer (Mastersizer 2000, manufactured by Malvern Instruments Ltd. in Worcestershire, United Kingdom) installed in the Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The test range, which was between 0.02 μm and 2000 μm, was divided into 100 size classes. The residual error was less than 2%. As the atmospheric dust in the study area has not been affected by pedogenesis, the samples were not pretreated to remove organic matter or carbonates.
Calculation method for the grain size parameters and principles of the classification were established according to the Folk and Ward (1957) and mentioned in Blott and Pye (2001) [22].
The polymodal grain size distribution of the deposited dust was fitted and separated using the lognormal function mentioned in detail by Xiao et al., (2009) [23]. Additionally, the formula is expressed as follows:
F ( x ) = i = 1 n [ c i σ i 2 π + exp ( ( x a i ) 2 2 σ i 2 ) d x ]
where n is the number of modes, ai is the mean value of the ith mode’s grain size in μm, ci is the percentage of the ith mode, and σi is the standard deviation of the ith mode.
The function of fitting residual is as follows:
d F = 1 m j = 1 m ( F ( x j ) G ( x j ) ) 2
where m is the number of grain size intervals. F (xj) and G (xj) are the fitted and measured percentage of the jth grain size interval, respectively.

4. Results

The atmospheric dust and deposited dust exhibit different grain parameters (Table 1). The deposited dust has a mean size between 70 and 77 μm, and it is either moderately sorted or moderately well sorted; the skewness is between fine skewed and symmetrical, and the kurtosis is between leptokurtic and mesokurtic. The atmospheric dust has a mean grain size is 19.5 μm, and it is very poorly sorted. The skewness is fine skewed, and the kurtosis is mesokurtic.
The grain size distribution curves of the deposited dust and atmospheric dust are shown in Figure 2. They exhibit obviously different grain size characteristics. The deposited dust shows the typical bimodal grain size distribution of the aeolian deposits (with a tail in the size class of <2 μm) [6,7]. The grain size characteristics of samples from different locations in the same dust fall event are very consistent with each other. For the coarse-grained component (peak 1), the grain size distribution curve is mainly between 20 and 200 μm, with a modal grain size of ~70 μm (Figure 2). The mean size is between 72 and 80 μm, and according to Folk and Ward (1957) as mentioned in Blott and Pye (2001), the component is moderately to well sorted. For peak 2, the mean size is between 13 and 20 μm, and the dust is poorly sorted. The content of peak 2 is sometimes small because the samples were collected during a dust storm with a strong airflow field [7,24]. In all, this result is consistent with the bimodal grain size distribution curve typical of aeolian deposits collected near the source area (Figure 2) [7].
The atmospheric dust collected in the study region exhibits unimodal grain size distribution characteristics (with a fine tail in the size class of <2 μm; Figure 2). The modal grain size is ~45 μm, which is smaller than the modal size of peak 1 of the deposited dust. The mean size is 19.5 μm, and the dust is very poorly sorted (σ = 4.1), finely skewed (Sk = −0.23), and mesokurtic (K = 1.01). Thus, the atmospheric dust exhibits a different grain size distribution curve than the deposited dust collected at the same time.

5. Discussion

5.1. Sorting Effect during Deposition

This study found different grain size distribution characteristics between atmospheric dust and deposited dust (Figure 2). The atmospheric dust showed a unimodal grain size distribution, small mode size, and a relatively low coarse particle content. However, the coarse particle content was significantly higher in the deposited dust, which exhibited a bimodal grain size distribution (Figure 2). This variation in the grain size distribution characteristic was observed in different areas and was universal. This result indicates that the atmospheric dust was sorted during deposition and that this sedimentary sorting is stable.
Detrital particles in air should undergo sorting during deposition, which is influenced by the airflow field and gravity and thus form a specific type of grain size distribution [25,26,27]. During transportation, different sedimentary sorting occurs for different size classes [7,26,28]. This can be explained by the ratio Uf/u*, where Uf is the settling velocity of the particle, and u* is the drag velocity of the airflow, which is always used to describe the state of motion of particles in a strong airflow field [29,30,31,32]. Generally, particles larger than 20 μm can settle to the surface relatively easily, even in a sand–dust storm, because of their larger gravitational forces [26,29]. However, particles smaller than 20 μm (Uf/u* < 0.1) do not deposit easily in a sand–dust storm (u* between 0.2 and 0.6 m/s) because of their smaller gravitational forces [25,28]. They are mainly deposited in stable airflow field after the sand–dust storm.
In a sand–dust storm, the coarser particles are generally sorted first according to the ratio Uf/u* (Figure 2), forming a coarse-grained component (peak 1), and the content of the fine-grained component (peak 2) is small or even absent (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [7,24] because these sizes are not conducive to deposition in a strong airflow field [25,28].
During the post-dust storm period, the fine-grained component is more conducive to being deposited in the stable airflow field. Therefore, these grains can be sorted gradually after the sand–dust storm, forming the fine-grained component (peak 2). The content of the fine-grained component increases with extension of the settling time [7]. Some coarser particles also continue to be deposited. Ultimately, the aeolian deposits exhibit a bimodal particle size distribution.
This phenomenon has also been observed elsewhere. For example, deposited dust and atmospheric dust collected in Mali region, West Africa, showed different grain size distribution characteristics between deposited dust and atmospheric dust (Figure 4) [33]. The deposited dust has a typical bimodal grain size distribution, but the atmospheric dust has a unimodal grain size distribution (Figure 2, Figure 4 and Figure 5). Additionally, similar grain size variation characteristics between atmospheric dust and deposited dust were found in Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, and Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China (Figure 5) [34,35]. The dry dust fall (deposited dust) observed in Harbin City (Figure 5A) exhibited a typical bimodal grain size distribution (with a fine tail at the size of less than 2 μm) [34], and very different grain size distributions featuring a unimodal distribution were observed from atmospheric dust collected by TSP and wet dust fall collected from “slurry rain” in Harbin City and Shantou City (Figure 5A,B). “Slurry rain” particles are dust particles that are leached from the atmosphere and settle to the surface via precipitation in the form of condensation particles. Such wet dust falls do not undergo sedimentary sorting during the leaching process, which is similar to the case of samples collected by an active sampler (Figure 5B).
In short, the atmospheric dust, which has a unimodal grain size distribution, exhibits a bimodal grain size distribution after sedimentary sorting.

5.2. Implications from the Grain Size Characteristics

The origin of the bimodal grain size distribution of aeolian sediment has been widely discussed, but some controversies remain. Some scholars have considered that different grain size sub-peaks indicate different material sources [6,33,37,38]. The peak 1 component is transported at a low altitude and deposited proximally due to its coarser grain size during a sand–dust storm [25,28]. The peak 2 component (<20 μm) can be transported a longer distance and hence over a larger spatial scale once the particles are lifted into the atmosphere [6,28]. Therefore, this component is considered to be sourced from a more distant region [37] or to be atmospheric background dust [6].
However, in this study, a higher proportion of the fine-grained component (<20 μm) was found in the atmosphere during dusty days (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). This supply was sufficient for the deposition of the peak 2 component, even without the material from distant regions. Moreover, many previous studies have found that both the coarse and the fine components of aeolian deposits came from the same source region [34,39,40]. The coarse- and fine-grained particle components of the loess on the Chinese Loess Plateau were shown to come from the same source area using the geochemical tracing method [39,40,41].
The unimodal grain size distribution of atmospheric dust indicates that detrital particles of various size classes are fully mixed during transportation once they are lifted into the atmosphere (Figure 2a). Even if the dust is supplied from different material sources, it is mixed thoroughly during transportation (would not show specific peaks in the grain size distribution (Figure 2a)). Thus, the atmospheric dust would not retain grain size sub-peaks corresponding to material sources. Subsequently, these mixed particles are sorted during deposition, forming a multi-modal grain size distribution. Therefore, the bimodal grain size distribution characteristics of aeolian deposits are mainly attributable to sedimentary sorting.
Studying the deposition processes and grain size characteristics of atmospheric dust in oasis areas before and after deposition is important for preventing dust hazards and for alleviating dust pollution. Oases are located at the edges of particle source regions and are important dust sinks [1,42]. The dust deposited in oases is mainly transported by suspension and saltation. Therefore, these two aspects should be considered to prevent dust pollution. Several strategies can be used. First, the shelterbelts around the oasis margin should be strengthened to prevent wind and sand invasion through the mechanical obstruction effect [1,43]. Second, for the portion of atmospheric dust that invades the interior of the oasis, plants with a strong retention capacity can be used to intercept the dust. The different grain size characteristics of atmospheric dust and foliar dust shown in previous studies further demonstrate that various plants can selectively retain different grain size fractions [3,4,44,45], resulting in a different grain size distribution of foliar dust (Figure 6) [4,43]. Consequently, analyzing the grain size characteristics of aeolian dust in oases has important implications for selecting greening tree species for intercepting the main size component of the atmospheric dust (Figure 6) and can help to maximize the wind-breaking, sand-fixing, and dust-intercepting effects of shelterbelts in oases.

6. Conclusions

A comparison of the grain size distribution characteristics between atmospheric dust and deposited dust collected before and after sedimentary sorting, respectively, produced some important results:
(1)
Atmospheric dust exhibited a unimodal grain size distribution that was significantly different from the bimodal distribution of the deposited dust. This difference was mainly caused by sedimentary sorting.
(2)
The main size class of the deposited dust in the Cele Oasis was 20–200 μm, which was larger than the mean grain size (19.5 μm) of the atmospheric dust. The mechanical blocking effect of an oasis protection system at the margins can help reduce the wind speed and accelerate the sedimentation of coarse particles during a sand–dust storm. Meanwhile, the foliage of oasis shelterbelts can intercept fine particles, which is significant for alleviating dust aerosol pollution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and L.X.; methodology, Y.L.; software, Y.L.; validation, G.M. and L.X.; formal analysis, G.M.; investigation, L.X. and Y.L.; resources, Y.L.; data curation, G.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L. and G.M.; writing—review and editing, L.X.; visualization, G.M.; supervision, L.X.; project administration, G.M. and L.X.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 41601012; the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, grant number 2022J01130422; the College Cultivating Program for Outstanding Young Scientific Talents of Fujian Province; the Desert Meteorological Science Research Foundation of China, grant number Sqj2020011; and the Foundation for Applied Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province, grant number 202103021224138.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their careful work and thoughtful suggestions that have helped improve this paper substantially.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Xu, L.S.; Mu, G.J.; Ren, X.; Wan, D.J.; He, J.X.; Lin, Y.C. Oasis microclimate effect on the dust deposition in Cele Oasis at southern Tarim Basin, China. Arab. J. Geosci. 2016, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wan, D.J.; Mu, G.J.; Jin, Z.D.; Lei, J.Q. The effects of oasis on aeolian deposition under different weather conditions: A case study at the southern margin of the Taklimakan Desert. Environ. Earth Sci. 2013, 68, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lin, Y.C.; Mu, G.J.; Xu, L.S.; Ren, X.; Zhao, X. Grain size characteristics of the foliar dust on several typical arbors under natural environment in Cele Oasis of Southern Xinjiang. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2015, 29, 241–245. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu, L.S.; Yan, Q.; Lin, Y.H.; Zhen, Z.L.; Duan, Y.H. Selective retention of particulate matter by nine plant species in central Shanxi Province, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 35902–35910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, Y.C.; Mu, G.J.; Chen, L.L.; Wu, C.N.; Xu, L.S. Sorting characteristics and its implication of the grain size of modern atmospheric dust deposition near the surface of the Cele Oasis, Xinjiang, China. J. Desert Res. 2022, 42, 139–146. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Sun, D.H.; Bloemendal, J.; Rea, D.K.; An, Z.S.; Vandenberghe, J.; Lu, H.Y.; Su, R.X.; Liu, T.S. Bimodal grain-size distribution of Chinese loess, and its palaeoclimatic implications. Catena 2004, 55, 235–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, Y.C.; Mu, G.J.; Xu, L.S.; Zhao, X. The origin of bimodal grain-size distribution for aeolian deposits. Aeolian Res. 2016, 20, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, T.S. Loess and the Environment; China Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 1985; pp. 1–215. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ding, Z.L.; Rutter, N.W.; Liu, T.S. Towards an orbital time scale for Chinese loess deposits. Quat. Sci. Rev. 1994, 13, 39–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Porter, S.C.; An, Z.S. Correlation between climate events in the North Atlantic and China during the last glaciation. Nature 1995, 375, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qiang, M.R.; Liu, Y.Y.; Jin, Y.X.; Song, L.; Huang, X.T.; Chen, F.H. Holocene record of eolian activity from Genggahai Lake, northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, X.T.; Oberhänsli, H.; von Suchodoletz, H.; Sorrel, P. Dust deposition in the Aral Sea: Implications for changes in atmospheric circulation in central Asia during the past 2000 years. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2011, 30, 3661–3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, F.H.; Qiang, M.R.; Zhou, A.F.; Xiao, S.; Chen, F.H. A 2000-year dust storm record from Lake Sugan in the dust source area of arid China. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 2149–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Prins, M.A.; Vriend, M.; Nugteren, G.; Vandenberghe, J.; Lu, H.; Zheng, H.; Weltje, G.J. Late Quaternary Aeolian dust input variability on the Chinese Loess Plateau: Inferences from unmixing of loess grain-size records. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2007, 26, 230–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. An, Z.S.; Colman, S.M.; Zhou, W.J.; Li, X.Q.; Brown, E.T.; Jull, A.J.T.; Cai, Y.J. Interplay between the Westerlies and Asian monsoon recorded in Lake Qinghai sediments since 32 ka. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.Y.; Zhang, X.M.; He, X.Y.; Zeng, F.J.; Foetzki, A.; Thomas, F.M. Water relation characteristics of four perennial plant species growing in the transition zone between oasis and open desert. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2004, 24, 1164–1171. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Guo, H.F.; Zeng, F.J.; Arndt, S.K.; Zeng, J.; Xing, W.J.; Liu, B. Influence of floodwater irrigation on vegetation composition and vegetation regeneration in a Taklimakan desert oasis. Sci. Bull. 2008, 53, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ma, H.; Lu, Y.L.; Xing, Y.; He, G.Z.; Sun, Y.M. Rural households’ attitude and economic strategies toward the conversion of cropland to forest and grassland program (CCFG): A case study in Qira, China. Environ. Manag. 2009, 43, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.N. A synthetic exemplary study on oasis zone in south of Takalamakan Desert. Arid. Zone Res. 1995, 12, 1–9. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, Z.T. Relations between wind velocity and direction in gobi area and oasis. J. Desert Res. 1990, 10, 36–42. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Wan, D.J.; Mu, G.J.; Lei, J.Q.; He, J.X.; Sun, Y.W.; Fan, D.D. The changing characteristic of sand-dust weather in recent 54 years and future trend forecast in the southern margin of Tarim basin. J. Arid. Resour. Environ. 2009, 23, 78–84. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Blott, S.J.; Pye, K. GRADISTAT: A grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surf. Processes Landf. 2001, 26, 1237–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiao, J.L.; Chang, Z.G.; Si, B.; Qin, X.G.; Itoh, S.; Lomtatidze, Z. Partitioning of the grain-size components of Dali Lake core sediments: Evidence for lake-level changes during the Holocene. J. Paleolimnol. 2009, 42, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, L.S.; Mu, G.J.; Ren, X.; Sun, L.; Lin, Y.C.; Wan, D.J. Spatial distribution of dust deposition during dust storms in Cele Oasis, on the southern margin of the Tarim Basin. Arid. Land Res. Manag. 2016, 30, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bagnold, R.A. The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes; William Morrow & Company: New York, NY, USA, 1941; pp. 1–98. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pye, K.; Tsoar, H. The mechanics and geological implications of dust transport and deposition in deserts with particular reference to loess formation and dune sand diagenesis in the northern Negev, Israel. In Geological Society; Special Publications: London, UK, 1987; Volume 35, pp. 139–156. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bagnold, R.A.; Barndorff-Nielsen, O. The pattern of natural size distributions. Sedimentology 1980, 27, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pye, K. Aeolian Dust and Dust Deposits; Academic Press: London, UK, 1987; pp. 19–37. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gillette, D.A.; Blifford, I.H.; Fryrear, D.W. The influence of wind velocity on the size distributions of aerosols generated by the wind erosion of soils. J. Geophys. Res. 1974, 79, 4068–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sundborg, A. Meteorological and climatological conditions for the genesis of aeolian sediments. Geogr. Ann. 1955, 37, 94–111. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chepil, W.S.; Woodruff, N.P. Sedimentary characteristics of duststorms. II. Visibility and dust concentration. Am. J. Sci. 1957, 255, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rouse, H. Modern conceptions of the mechanics of fluid turbulence. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1937, 102, 403–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mctainsh, G.H.; Nickling, W.G.; Lynch, A.W. Dust deposition and particle size in Mali, West Africa. Catena 1997, 29, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xie, Y.Y.; Chi, Y.P. Geochemical investigation of dry- and wet-deposited dust during the same dust-storm event in Harbin, China: Constraint on provenance and implications for formation of aeolian loess. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2016, 120, 43–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Du, S.H.; Islam, G.M.A.; Xiang, R.; Yang, X.L. The dust deposition process and biogeochemical impacts in the northern South China sea. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 2021, 57, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, X.S.; Han, Z.Y.; Chen, Y.Y.; Cai, Y.F.; Yang, D.Y. Characteristics and source of rain dust in Nanjing on March 11, 2006. Quat. Sci. 2009, 29, 43–54. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  37. He, K.; Xie, Y.Y.; Zhang, L.J.; Zhou, J.; Kang, C.G. Grain Size Characteristic of Sand-dust Sedimentary in Harbin City and Its Implication. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2005, 25, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen, F.; Chen, S.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Gowan, E.J.; Qiang, M.; Dong, G.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; et al. Asian dust-storm activity dominated by Chinese dynasty changes since 2000 BP. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sun, D.H.; Bloementdal, J.; Rea, D.K.; Vandenberghe, J.; Jiang, F.C.; An, Z.S.; Su, R.X. Grain-size distribution function of polymodal sediments in hydraulic and aeolian environments, and numerical partitioning of the sedimentary components. Sediment. Geol. 2002, 152, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, Y.B.; Tada, R.; Chen, J.; Liu, Q.S.; Toyoda, S.; Tani, A.; Ji, J.F.; Isozaki, Y. Tracing the provenance of fine-grained dust deposited on the central Chinese Loess Plateau. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, 35, L01804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, J.; Li, G.J.; Yang, J.D.; Rao, W.B.; Lu, H.Y.; Balsam, W.; Sun, Y.B.; Ji, J.F. Nd and Sr isotopic characteristics of Chinese deserts: Implications for the provenances of Asian dust. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2007, 71, 3904–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Y.Z.; Dong, G.R.; Jin, J.; Cao, Y.Q. A preliminary observation and study dustfall in Tarim Basin. J. Desert Res. 1994, 14, 18–24. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  43. Lin, Y.C.; Xu, L.S. Spatial change of the grain size of aeolian sediments in Qira oasis- desert ecotone, Northwest China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 28, 1337–1443. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, G.; Wang, L.H.; Sun, F.B.; Wang, Y.J.; Wu, H.T.; Hu, Z.W.; Zhang, B.B.; Yu, L.; Yan, H.; Shao, F. Capacity of Landscaping Plants to Accumulate Airborne Particulate Matter in Hangzhou, China. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, J.Q.; Cao, Z.G.; Zou, S.Y.; Liu, H.H.; Hai, X.; Wang, S.H.; Duan, J.; Xi, B.Y.; Yan, G.X.; Zhang, S.W.; et al. An investigation of the leaf retention capacity, efficiency and mechanism for atmospheric particulate matter of five greening tree species in Beijing, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 616–617, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The study region and sampling site. (a) The Taklimakan Desert in the Tarim Basin, (b) the Cele Oasis at southern edge of the Taklimakan Desert, and (c) Shelterbelt on the western edge of Cele Oasis.
Figure 1. The study region and sampling site. (a) The Taklimakan Desert in the Tarim Basin, (b) the Cele Oasis at southern edge of the Taklimakan Desert, and (c) Shelterbelt on the western edge of Cele Oasis.
Sustainability 14 08093 g001
Figure 2. Grain size distribution curves of the atmospheric dust and deposited dust (a1,b1). (a2,b2): Peaks 1 and 2 were fitted and separated according to the lognormal function mentioned by Xiao et al. [23].
Figure 2. Grain size distribution curves of the atmospheric dust and deposited dust (a1,b1). (a2,b2): Peaks 1 and 2 were fitted and separated according to the lognormal function mentioned by Xiao et al. [23].
Sustainability 14 08093 g002
Figure 3. Grain size distribution curves of the deposited dust collected during sand–dust storms in the Cele Oasis [24]. The samples in (a) were collected during 3–5 April 2013, and those in (b) were collected during 16–17 April 2013.
Figure 3. Grain size distribution curves of the deposited dust collected during sand–dust storms in the Cele Oasis [24]. The samples in (a) were collected during 3–5 April 2013, and those in (b) were collected during 16–17 April 2013.
Sustainability 14 08093 g003
Figure 4. Grain size distributions of atmospheric dust and deposited dust collected at the town of Sevare, Mali [33]. (a). Samples collected at 2.5 m, 25 April 1990; (b). Samples collected at 2.5 m, 26–27 April 1990.
Figure 4. Grain size distributions of atmospheric dust and deposited dust collected at the town of Sevare, Mali [33]. (a). Samples collected at 2.5 m, 25 April 1990; (b). Samples collected at 2.5 m, 26–27 April 1990.
Sustainability 14 08093 g004
Figure 5. Grain size distributions of atmospheric dust and deposited dust. Data for part (A) are from Xie and Chi, whose samples were collected in Harbin, China, on 13 May 2011 [34]. Data of part (B) are atmospheric dust collected in the winter monsoon ((a) 12 December 2016) and summer monsoon ((b) August 2016) Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China [35], and atmospheric dust collected in Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China ((c) 11 March 2006) [36].
Figure 5. Grain size distributions of atmospheric dust and deposited dust. Data for part (A) are from Xie and Chi, whose samples were collected in Harbin, China, on 13 May 2011 [34]. Data of part (B) are atmospheric dust collected in the winter monsoon ((a) 12 December 2016) and summer monsoon ((b) August 2016) Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China [35], and atmospheric dust collected in Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China ((c) 11 March 2006) [36].
Sustainability 14 08093 g005
Figure 6. Grain size distribution curves of foliar dust, atmospheric dust, and deposited dust [3].
Figure 6. Grain size distribution curves of foliar dust, atmospheric dust, and deposited dust [3].
Sustainability 14 08093 g006
Table 1. Grain size parameters of the atmospheric dust and deposited dust.
Table 1. Grain size parameters of the atmospheric dust and deposited dust.
SamplesMean (μm)SortingSkewnessKurtosis
T1WE0473.11.52−0.050.98
WE0572.51.62−0.050.98
WE0673.01.62−0.070.98
WE0771.81.63−0.050.98
WE0876.61.54−0.040.98
WE0976.11.52−0.040.97
WE1072.21.58−0.040.96
WE1173.61.58−0.050.96
Mean value 73.61.58−0.050.97
T2CB-169.81.74−0.221.41
CB-272.81.61−0.11.08
Mean value71.31.68−0.161.25
AD119.54.08−0.231.047
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Y.; Mu, G.; Xu, L. Grain Size and Sedimentary Sorting Characteristics of Atmospheric Dust in the Cele Oasis, Southern Margin of Taklimakan Desert. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138093

AMA Style

Lin Y, Mu G, Xu L. Grain Size and Sedimentary Sorting Characteristics of Atmospheric Dust in the Cele Oasis, Southern Margin of Taklimakan Desert. Sustainability. 2022; 14(13):8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Yongchong, Guijin Mu, and Lishuai Xu. 2022. "Grain Size and Sedimentary Sorting Characteristics of Atmospheric Dust in the Cele Oasis, Southern Margin of Taklimakan Desert" Sustainability 14, no. 13: 8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138093

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop