Next Article in Journal
Greening the Artificial Intelligence for a Sustainable Planet: An Editorial Commentary
Next Article in Special Issue
Agro-Morphological Characterization and Some Seed Characteristics of Wild Crambe (Brassicaceae) Species in Turkey
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Using Farm-Grown Forage as a Component in ad Libitum Liquid Feeding for Pregnant Sows in Group-Housing on Body Condition Development and Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Pre-Harvest Organic Cytokinin Application on the Post-Harvest Physiology of Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Mulberry (Morus nigra L., Morus alba L. and Morus rubra L.) Production in Eastern Turkey

1
The Ministry of National Defense, Ankara 06000, Turkey
2
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir 40100, Turkey
3
Atatürk Horticultural Central Research Institute, Yalova 77100, Turkey
4
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu 14030, Turkey
5
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25000, Turkey
6
Division of Seed Science and Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
7
Unit of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, AIMST University, Semeling, Bedong 08100, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(24), 13507; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413507
Submission received: 28 October 2021 / Accepted: 9 November 2021 / Published: 7 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agroecology and Sustainable Organic Farming Systems)

Abstract

:
In this study, a total of 55 wild-grown mulberry landraces belonging to Morus alba L., Morus rubra L., and Morus nigra L. species (Rosales order, Moraceae family, Morus L. genus) were sampled around the Van Lake basin, and some fruit characteristics were determined. All landraces are naturally grown in the Lake Van basin under pesticide-free conditions. As fruit character, phenolic compounds (gallic acid, catechin, quercetin, protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, rutin, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, and phlorizin) and organic acids (malic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid and ascorbic acid) were determined. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to determine the correlation between mulberry species in terms of biochemical compounds. As a result of PCA-biplot analysis, two variations were sufficient to explain the correlation between phenolic compounds and organic acids. This ratio reveals that mulberry species are separated with sharp boundaries in terms of biochemical compounds. Chlorogenic acid and rutin content were high in all mulberry landraces. The highest chlorogenic acid content was detected in landrace 65VN03 belonging to M. rubra (3.778 mg/g), 65GV12 belonging to M. nigra (3.526 mg/g), 13AD08 belonging to M. rubra (2.461 mg/g), and 13AH02 belonging to M. rubra (6.246 mg/g) landraces. In terms of organic acid content, malic acid was the dominant organic acid for genotypes. The rich bioactive compounds make M. alba, M. rubra, and M. nigra landraces as cultivar candidates for breeding purposes. It is a valuable source of bioactive agents that may have prevented humans from oxidative-stress-related diseases.

1. Introduction

Turkey is well-known for its rich flora and less-known plants, including fruits, which are widespread with a broad geographic distribution [1,2,3].
Mulberries have high adaptability to different climatic and soil conditions. The species is resistant to abiotic stress conditions such as low soil fertility or harsh climate, and it readily colonizes wild, edge habitats, fallow pastures, or wastelands. Due to this feature, this less-known fruit is naturally grown in valleys, as well as high-altitude plateaus, even above 2500 m asl [4,5].
They are grown in temperate and subtropical climate conditions because many species and numerous genotypes and landraces represent the genus. The species are quite different from each other for most of the plant biological traits. Morus alba L. (white mulberry), Morus nigra L. (black mulberry), and Morus rubra L. (red mulberry) species are the most widespread species in the world [6,7,8,9,10]. In Turkey, where temperate, subtropical, and even small tropical climate areas are experienced, many fruit species can be grown as wild for centuries, showing rich biological diversity, and revealing valuable gene resources.
Biodiversity is a scorching topic for humankind, and everyone depends on the world’s biological resources for survival. It is very important for sustainable fruit production as well. Developing or developed nations are impoverished by the continuing loss and degradation of agrobiodiversity [11,12]. Their diversity offers the possibility of increasing food supplies and adapting to changing conditions.
Anatolia, which has a long history of using mulberries as edible fruits and traditional medicine, is rich in white, red, and black mulberry genetic resources and exhibits great agrobiodiversity for fruits. In Turkey, mulberry fruit is commonly eaten fresh, dried, or processed into molasses and jam for its delicious taste, pleasing color, low-calorie content, and high nutrient content. For centuries mulberry fruit is also used in folk medicine for its pharmacological effects, including fever reduction, treatment of sore throat, liver and kidney protection, eyesight improvement, and ability to lower blood pressure in Turkey [13,14,15]. The rich gen pool of mulberries in Turkey is still important due to considerable past and present contributions of farmers and rural communities, especially in the developing world, for the creation, conservation, and availability of wild grown mulberry genetic resources [7,8,9,10,13]. In Turkey all mulberry trees are pesticide free due to its strong defense mechanism to pest and diseases. Mulberries have high content of phenolic compounds and it is well-known that phenolic compounds are the key elements of the defense system of plants against pest and diseases.
More recently, there has been an increased interest in the biological traits of mulberry fruits worldwide. All these studies show the characteristic rich components of mulberry fruit and their health benefits [16,17,18,19]. Parallel to these studies, the number of studies on mulberry fruit biological traits in Turkey has increased but not enough. The country has diverse climatic and ecological conditions; thus, each region has its specific mulberry genotypes because Turkey has no registered cultivars for mulberries. Therefore, each region needs to work on its mulberry germplasm.
Compared to studies of Asian countries where mulberries originated and are widely cultivated, studies focused on the leaves of mulberries, which are vital for sericulture; however, no commercial sericulture activities are available in Turkey, and mulberries are only used for fruit production [13,20,21,22,23].
Black and white mulberries are very popular and have more commercial value than red mulberries. Black mulberry fruits are valued as the most prominent attractive fruits for fresh consumption, have higher phytochemical content, are very suitable for fruit juice production, and are the most used species in folk medicine for a long time compared to white and other mulberries. However, white mulberries widely process into several valuable products such as molasses and constituents of both species are suggested as promising natural sources for dietary supplements and cosmetic products [24,25,26,27,28,29].
There are profound biological differences between both the species. Black mulberry is very difficult to propagate and grows very slowly. In addition, black mulberry is more resistant to adverse environmental conditions than white mulberry. The high phenolic compound content in various organs of the black mulberry plant constitutes the plant’s defense system [29,30].
This study determines the phenolic compounds and organic acids of landraces of mulberry species (Morus nigra L., Morus alba L., and Morus rubra L.) grown around Lake Van. Many black, white, and red mulberry species are grown in the natural flora in this region where the research was carried out. However, since this affluent mulberry population is not sufficiently utilized, it has been seen that mulberry genetic resources are in danger of extinction day by day. Therefore, disseminating research on these genotypes is of great importance in protecting mulberry genetic resources and world biodiversity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

In this study, phenolic compounds and organic acids of 55 seed-propagated mulberry landraces grown in Van Merkez, and Gevaş districts in the Van Lake basin, and Adilcevaz and Ahlat districts in Bitlis province [31] were determined (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Traditionally, Turkish farmers left good seed-propagated mulberry plants on the field. In this way, 55 landraces are so-called farmers’ selection. No pesticides and inorganic fertilizers were used in these landraces. The landraces selected in this study are those grown in natural form. The surface area of Lake Van is 3713 km2. Lake Van is the world’s largest soda lake and also the largest lake in Turkey. Van climate is continental climate and vegetation is steppe. Winter months are harsh in Van with heavy snow. Spring months are the months with the most precipitation in Van. Summer months in Van are generally dry and hot, with the effect of Lake Van making it somewhat cooler. These months do not have much precipitation, but are accompanied by winds. The annual average temperature is 9 °C. The average temperature of the coldest month of the year is −3.5 °C, and the average temperature of the warmest month is 22 °C [32]. Microclimate areas have been formed in the region due to the moderating effect of Van Lake on the climate. It was observed that mulberry species spread in the natural flora, especially in the Van Lake basin and form an affluent population. This situation allows the cultivation of many fruit species in the region. In June-July, the ripening period of the mulberry fruits, 1 kg of fruit samples was taken from each tree in a homogeneous way representing the genotypes and placed in cloth bags. In this study, fruits belonging to mulberry species were harvested at full maturity stages with species-specific color formation. These landraces, which grow in a wide area in nature, are grown in areas with different soil structures. It was observed that landraces of mulberry species were generally between the ages of 20 and 25 in the region where the study was conducted. Landraces of Morus alba L. species were harvested on 25–30 June 2015–2016, genotypes of Morus rubra L. species were harvested on 13–18 July 2015–2016, and landraces of Morus nigra L. were harvested on 7–19 July 2015–2016 in Merkez and Gevaş districts located in Van province. Harvest dates of mulberry species in the Bitlis region; landraces of Morus alba L. species in Adilcevaz and Ahlat districts were harvested on 20–28 July 2015–2016, Morus rubra L. species were harvested on 3–12 July 2015–2016, and Morus nigra L. landraces were harvested on 11–16 July 2015–2016. Then the necessary analyses of these samples were made in the laboratory. Samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. Biochemical analyses were done in triplicate.

2.2. Determination of Phenolic Compounds

Phenolic compounds were detected with a modified HPLC procedure suggested by Rodriguez-Delgado et al. [33]. Fruit extracts were mixed with distilled water in a ratio of 1:1. The mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000 rpm. Supernatants were filtrated with coarse filter paper and twice with 0.45-µm membrane filter (Millipore Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and injected into an HPLC (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation was performed with a 250 × 4.6 mm, 4 μm ODS column (HiChrom, Reading, UK). As mobile phase, solvent A methanol: acetic acid: water (10:2:28) and Solvent B methanol: acetic acid: water (90:2:8) were used. Spectral measurements were made at 254 and 280 nm, and flow rate and injection volume were adjusted to 1 mL min−1 and 20 µL, respectively.

2.3. Determination of Vitamin C

Vitamin C content of fruits was detected with a modified HPLC procedure suggested by [34]. Fruit extracts (50 g) were supplemented with 2.5% (w v−1) metaphosphoric acid (Sigma, M6285, 33.5%), then centrifuged at 6500 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C temperature. A 0.5 mL aliquot of the mixture was brought to a final volume of 10 mL with 2.5% (w v−1) metaphosphoric acid. Supernatants were filtered with a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter (Phenomenex, Reading, UK). C18 column (Phenomenex Luna C18, 250 × 4.60 mm, five µ) was used to identify ascorbic acid at 25 °C. Double distilled water with 1 mL min−1 flow rate and pH of 2.2 (acidified with H2SO4) was used as a mobile phase. Spectral measurements were made at 254 nm wavelength using a DAD detector. Different standards of Vitamin C (Sigma, A5960) (50 mg kg1, 100 mg kg−1, 500 mg kg−1, 1000 mg kg−1 and 2000 mg kg−1) were used for quantification.

2.4. Determination of Organic Acids

Organic acids were identified by the technique reported by [35]. Each sample (50 g) was mixed with 80 mL of 0.009 N H2SO4 (Heidolph Silent Crusher M, Schwabach, Germany), then homogenized for 1 h with a shaker (HeidolphUnimax 1010, Germany). The mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000 rpm, and supernatants were filtrated twice with 0.45 µm membrane filter following filtration with coarse filter (Millipore Millex-HV Hydrophilic PVDF, Millipore, Burlingron, MA, USA) and run through a SEP-PAK C18 cartridge. Organic acid readings were performed with HPLC using Aminex column (HPX-87 H, 300 mm × 7.8 mm, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA) at 214 and 280 nm wavelengths Agilent package program (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The Duncan test was used as a multiple comparison test to express the differences between the averages. Windows SPSS 20 was used in the statistical evaluations, and the differences between the means were evaluated by subjecting to ANOVA variance analysis and determined with Duncan multiple comparison tests (p < 0.05). In R software, the principal component analysis was used for all variables with the ggplot2 and factoextra packages [36].

3. Results

3.1. Organic Acids

In this study, 55 landraces of 3 mulberry species growing in the natural flora of the Van Lake basin were examined, and the agro-biological characteristics in fruits of these landraces were determined. Among organic acids, malic acid was higher than other organic acids and dominant organic acids for mulberry fruits. Differences between mulberry landraces in terms of organic acid content were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05).
When the malic acid levels of genotypes in Van Merkez were examined, the highest value was found in 65VN09, M. alba (5.725 mg 100g−1) landrace, and the lowest value was determined in 65VN04, M. rubra (1.923 mg 100 g1) (Table 1). The malic acid content of mulberry landraces grown in the Gevaş (Van) district varied between 2.981 and 7.918 g/100 g (Table 2), followed by citric acid (0.770–2.710 g/100 g).
The citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid, and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) contents of mulberry landraces grown in Adilcevaz (Bitlis) district were varied between 0.999 mg 100 g−1–3.679 mg 100 g−1, 0.085 mg 100 g−1–0.377 mg 100 g−1, 2.222 mg 100 g−1–6.230 mg 100 g−1, 0.067 mg 100 g−1–0.461 mg 100 g−1, 0.016 mg 100 g−1–0.439 mg 100 g−1, 9.566 mg 100 g−1–24.077 mg 100 g−1, respectively (Table 3). It was observed that the order of organic acid contents of mulberry landraces grown in the Ahlat (Bitlis) district from highest to lowest was generally in the form of malic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, succinic acid, and fumaric acid (Table 4). When the organic acid contents of the fruits belonging to the landraces were examined, it was determined that malic acid was higher than the other acids in general. It was observed that the malic acid content of the fruits belonging to the landraces grown, especially in the Gevaş district, was higher than the landraces grown in other regions. Considering the organic acid distribution, it was determined that tartaric acid and fumaric acid contents were lower than other organic acids. In terms of vitamin C content, it was determined that the 13AD15 M. alba landrace was superior to the landraces grown in other regions. Vitamin C varied between 9.050 and 20.179 mg 100 g−1 among genotypes based on all 55 landraces.
In this study, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to determine the correlation between mulberry species in terms of organic acid contents. In the PCA analysis, the statistical variation rate was found to be 100%. This ratio was seen as a practical and high value in determining the correlation between mulberry species. It was determined that the fruits of Morus alba species contain higher levels of vitamin C than other species. Morus rubra was the most prominent species in terms of fumaric, succinic, and tartaric acid content. Morus nigra species was found to be behind other species in terms of organic acid content in general. According to PCA analysis, a negative correlation was determined between malic acid and vitamin C. A parallel correlation was noted between tartaric, succinic, and fumaric acid (Figure 3).

3.2. Phenolic Compounds

When the phenolic compound contents of the mulberry landraces were examined, it was seen that the dominant phenolic compound was chlorogenic acid, followed by rutin. There were statistically significant differences between mulberry genotypes in terms of phenolic compound contents (p ≤ 0.05). This study determined that the rutin content of mulberry landraces grown in the central district of Van ranged from 0.115 mg/g (65VN07, M. alba) to 2.070 mg/g (65VN03, M. rubra).
The chlorogenic acid content ranged from 0.101 mg/g (65VN01, M. rubra) to 3.778 mg g−1 in 65VN03, M. rubra (Table 5 and Table 6). The highest chlorogenic acid content of mulberry landraces grown in the Gevaş (Van) district was determined in 65GV12, M. nigra (3.526 mg g−1) landrace and the highest rutin content was determined in 65GV11, M. nigra (3.903 mg g−1) landrace (Table 7 and Table 8). Among the mulberry landraces grown in the Adilcevaz district of Bitlis province, it was noted that the 13AD08, M. rubra genotype was superior to the other landraces in terms of chlorogenic acid content. The highest rutin content was determined in the 13AD02, M. rubra landrace (Table 9 and Table 10). The highest chlorogenic acid content of mulberry landraces grown in the Ahlat (Bitlis) district was determined in 13AH02, M. rubra landrace (6.246 mg g−1). The highest rutin content was recorded in the 13AH04, M. rubra (2.229 mg g−1) landrace (Table 11 and Table 12).
As a result of the PCA analysis performed to determine the correlation between mulberry species in terms of phenolic compounds, it was observed that the variation occurred was 100%. This ratio shows that the species are entirely separated from each other, and the correlation between the phenolic compounds is effectively explained by the two PCA factors (Figure 4). The study determined that mulberry species were split into different regions in the PCA plane regarding phenolic compound content. It was observed that Morus nigra species and rutin, chlorogenic, vanillic, and caffeic acid were located in the same region on the PCA plane and were more prominent in terms of these biochemical compounds. Morus alba was found to be superior to other genotypes in terms of gallic, ferulic, and syringic acids. In terms of catechin and protocatechuic acid, it was determined that Morus rubra species came to the fore. It was determined that there was a negative relationship between catechin and p-coumaric and between quercetin and protocatechuic acid.

4. Discussion

Organic acids are of great importance in human health and are effective in many physiological events (taste formation, ripening, etc.) in plants. The organic acid sugar ratio reveals the ripening status of the fruits [12,21]. When these acids are low, the fruits are sweet, and when they are high, the fruits become sour [37]. Özgen et al. [38] and Sanchez et al. [25] reported that malic acid and citric acid were higher than other organic acids in mulberry fruit. Gundogdu et al. [21] reported that citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, and fumaric acid in black mulberries were 1.084 g 100 g1, 0.123 g 100 g−1, 1.323 g 100 g−1, 0.342 g 100 g−1, and 0.011 g 100 g−1, respectively. Eyduran et al. [39] reported that the malic acid content of mulberry fruits ranged from 1.13 to 3.04 g 100 g−1. Geçer et al. [40] found that the malic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, succinic acid, and fumaric acid contents of mulberries were 3.07–2.13 g 100 g−1, 0.48–1.03 g 100 g−1, 0.15–0.43 g 100 g−1, 0.12–0.44 g 100 g−1, 0.01–0.12 g 100 g−1, respectively. Ercisli and Orhan [22] determined that the vitamin C content of fruits from black mulberry genotypes grown in the Northeastern Anatolia region of Turkey ranged from 14.9 to 18.8 mg 100 mL−1. It has been observed that the results we have obtained in this study are generally in parallel with the findings of other researchers [25,39,40,41]. The vitamin C content of fruits varies according to the different extraction methods. Hadeel et al. [42] found that the vitamin C content of bananas was lower when extracted with methanol. The same researchers revealed that the vitamin C content was higher in pomegranates and white grapes. Biochemical compounds vary according to the different parts of the fruit and applications affect these compounds [43,44,45,46]. In addition, cultural practices and genetic and environmental factors affect the examined genotypes’ organic acid and vitamin C contents. Although the losses of organic acids and vitamin C were minimized during fruit harvest, storage, and analysis processes, this situation could not be prevented entirely. Therefore, changes and reactions in the physiology of fruits affected the organic acid and vitamin C content.
Phenolic compounds react with the enzyme polyphenoloxidase and cause browning. In this respect, these compounds are biochemicals that are effective in fruit processing and color formation. It is influential in forming the flavors of the products, especially in forming a bitter taste in the mouth [12,21]. Anthocyanins, one of the phenolic substances, provide the unique colors of fruits and vegetables. In addition, phenolic compounds cause the browning of products obtained from fruits and vegetables. Phenolic compounds, which significantly affect the fruit juice processing industry, form deposits in beverages such as fruit juices and wine [34]. According to Gundogdu et al. [21] and Natic et al. [24], chlorogenic acid and rutin were the two main phenolics in mulberry fruits. Considering the phenolic substance distributions of the examined genotypes, significant differences were determined between them. It is thought that these differences are caused by species, genotype characteristics, cultural practices (fertilization, pruning etc.,), climate and soil characteristics of the region where they are grown. According to Gundogdu et al. [21], the amounts of gallic acid, catechin, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, o-coumaric acid, vanillic acid, rutin, and quercetin in black mulberry fruits were 0.15 mg g−1, 0.08 mg g−1, 3.11 mg g−1, 0.13 mg g−1, 0.10 mg g−1, 0.13 mg g−1, 0.06 mg g−1, 0.13 mg g−1, 0.04 mg g−1, 1.42 mg g−1, 0.11 mg g−1, respectively. Eyduran et al. [39] reported that rutin and chlorogenic acid contents were higher than other phenolic compounds in mulberry fruits. Gecer et al. [40] reported that routine in black mulberry fruits and chlorogenic acid in white mulberries was high. Among the factors affecting the phenolic compounds in fruits are genetic factors, ecological factors (such as humidity, light, temperature, and soil structure), and cultural practices [21,38,40,41,47,48,49,50,51]. In addition, phenolic substances affect the products obtained by processing fruits to leave a bitter taste in the mouth after consumption and have a cloudy fruit juices’ appearance [30]. Therefore, especially phenolic compounds play an important role in the fruit juice processing industry.

5. Conclusions

In this study, it was seen that the Van Lake basin has rich mulberry genetic resources. It had been observed that some landraces stand out in terms of biochemical contents among these mulberry genetic resources. These landraces are evaluated on a basin basis; 65VN09 landrace in the Gevaş region, 65VN09 genotype in Van Merkez, 13AD16 genotype in the Adilcevaz region and 13AH12 landrace in Ahlat region were found promising in terms of malic acid content, which is the dominant organic acid. When landraces are evaluated in terms of chlorogenic acid content, which is the dominant phenolic among phenolic compounds, it was seen that 65VN03 genotype in the Van Central region, 65GV12 genotype in Gevaş region, 13AD08 landrace in Adilcevaz region, and 13AH02 landrace in Ahlat region came to the fore.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, A.C., A.K. and E.O.; data curation, A.C., A.K. and E.O.; investigation, M.G., A.C. and A.K.; writing—original draft, S.E., R.K. and R.C.; writing—review and editing, S.E., R.K. and R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All-new research data were presented in this contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ozkan, G. Phenolic compounds, organic acids, vitamin C and antioxidant capacity in Prunus spinose. C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 2019, 72, 267–273. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cengiz, R.; Korkut, K.Z. Development of doubled haploid maize lines by using in vivo haploid technique. Biotech Stud. 2020, 29, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maraş-Vanlıoğlu, F.G.; Yaman, H.; Kayaçetin, F. Genetic diversity analysis of some species in Brassicaceae family with ISSR markers. Biotech Stud. 2020, 29, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Engin, S.P.; Mert, C. The effects of harvesting time on the physicochemical components of aronia berry. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2020, 44, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ozkan, G.; Ercisli, S.; Sagbas, H.I.; Ilhan, G. Diversity on fruits of wild grown European cranberrybush from Coruh valley in Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau 2020, 62, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bellini, E.; Giordani, E.; Roger, J.P. The mulberry for fruit. Inf. Agrar. 2000, 56, 89–93. [Google Scholar]
  7. Choudhary, R.; Chaudhury, R.; Malik, S.K.; Kumar, S.; Pal, D. Genetic stability of mulberry germplasm after cryopreservation by two-step freezing technique. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 5983–5993. [Google Scholar]
  8. Choudhary, R.; Chaudhury, R.; Malik, S.K. Development of an efficient regeneration and rapid clonal multiplication protocol for three different Morus species using dormant buds as explants. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Choudhary, R.; Malik, S.K.; Chaudhury, R.; Pal, D.; Patil, P.; Sharma, K.C. Scanning electron microscopic study on freezing behaviour of tissue cells in dormant bud of mulberry(Morus sp.). Bangladesh J. Bot. 2018, 44, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choudhary, R.; Malik, S.K.; Chaudhury, R. Development of an efficient cryoconservation protocol for Himalayan mulberry (Morus laevigata Wall. ex Brandis) using dormant axillary buds as explants. Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 56, 342–350. [Google Scholar]
  11. Datta, R.K. Mulberry Cultivation and Utilization in India. Mulberry for Animal Production. FAO Anim. Prod. Heal. Pap. 2002, 147, 45–62. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ercisli, S.; Orhan, E. Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry fruits. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 1380–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ercisli, S. A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2004, 51, 419–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, J.-J.; Hsu, M.-J.; Huang, H.-P.; Chung, D.-J.; Chang, Y.-C.; Wang, C.-J. Mulberry anthocyanins inhibit oleic acid induced lipid accumulation by reduction of lipogenesis and promotion of hepatic lipid clearance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 6069–6076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yang, S.; Wang, B.L.; Li, Y. Advances in the pharmacological study of Morus alba L. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2014, 49, 824–831. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gryn-Rynko, A.; Bazylak, G.; Olszewska-Slonina, D. New potential phytotherapeutics obtained from white mulberry (Morus alba L.) leaves. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 84, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Bao, T.; Gowd, V. Mulberry fruit extract affords protection against ethyl carbamate-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative stress. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1594963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Yuan, Q.; Zhao, L. The mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruit—A review of characteristic components and health benefits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 10383–10394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.; Ma, Z.F.; Luo, X.; Li, X. Effects of mulberry fruit (Morus alba L.) consumption on health outcomes: A mini-review. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gundogdu, M.; Tunçtürk, M.; Berk, S.; Sekeroglu, N.; Gezici, S. Antioxidant capacity and bioactive contents of mulberry species from Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. 2017, 52, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gundogdu, M.; Muradoglu, F.; Sensoy, R.I.G.; Yılmaz, H. Determination of fruit chemical properties of Morus nigra L., Morus alba L. and Morus rubra L. by HPLC. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 132, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ercisli, S.; Orhan, E. Some physico-chemical characteristics of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) genotypes from Northeast Anatolia region of Turkey. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Koyuncu, F. Organic acid composition of native black mulberry fruit. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2004, 40, 367–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Natic, M.M.; Dabic, D.C.; Papetti, A.; Fotiric-Aksic, M.M.; Ognjanov, V.; Ljubojevic, M.; Tesic, Z.L. Analysis and characterization of phytochemicals in mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruits grown in Vojvodina, North Serbia. Food Chem. 2015, 171, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sanchez, E.M.; Calin-Sanchez, A.; Carbonell-Barrachina, A.A.; Mel-Garejo, P.; Hernandez, F.; Martinez-Nicolas, J.J. Physicochemical characterization of eight Spanish mulberry clones: Processing and fresh market aptitudes. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sanchez-Salcedo, E.M.; Mena, P.; Garcia-Viguera, C.; Martinez, J.J.; Hernandez, F. Phytochemical evaluation of white (Morus alba L.) and black (Morus nigra L.) mulberry fruits, a starting point for the assessment of their beneficial properties. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 12, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bae, S.; Suh, H.-J. Antioxidant activities of five different mulberry cultivars in Korea. LWT 2007, 40, 955–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gungor, N.; Sengul, M. Antioxidant activity, total phenolic content and selected physicochemical properties of white mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruits. Int. J. Food Prop. 2008, 11, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kostic, D.A.; Dimitrijevic, D.S.; Mitic, S.S.; Mitic, M.N.; Stojanovic, G.S.; Zivanovic, A. Phenolic content and antioxidant activities of fruit extracts of Morus nigra L. (Moraceae) from Southeast Serbia. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2013, 12, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  30. Orhan, E.; Ercisli, S. Genetic relationships between selected Turkish mulberry genotypes (Morus spp.) based on RAPD markers. Genet. Mol. Res. 2010, 9, 2176–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Available online: https://earth.google.com (accessed on 16 June 2021).
  32. Available online: https://www.mgm.gov.tr (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  33. Rodriguez-Delgado, M.A.; Malovana, S.; Perez, J.P.; Borges, T.; Garcia-Montelongo, F.J. Separation of phenolic compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography with absorbance and fluorimetric detection. J. Chromatogr. 2001, 912, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cemeroğlu, B.; Yemenicioğlu, A.; Özkan, M. Meyve ve Sebze lerin Bileşimi, 1. Meyve Ve Sebze İşleme Teknol. 2004, 1, 670. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bevilacqua, A.E.; Califano, A.N. Determination of organic acids in dairy products by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Food Sci. 1989, 54, 1076–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2020. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/ (accessed on 25 November 2020).
  37. Cemeroğlu, B.; Acar, J. Meyve ve Sebze İşleme Teknolojisi. Gıda Teknol. Derneği 1986, 6, 29–30. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ozgen, M.; Serce, S.; Kaya, C. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties of anthocyanin-rich Morus nigra and Morus rubra fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 119, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eyduran, S.P.; Ercisli, S.; Akin, M.; Beyhan, O.; Gecer, M.K.; Eyduran, E.; Erturk, Y.E. Organic acids, sugars, vitamin C, antioxidant capacity, and phenolic compounds in fruits of white (Morus alba L.) and black (Morus nigra L.) mulberry genotypes. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2015, 88, 134–138. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gecer, M.K.; Akin, M.; Gundogdu, M.; Eyduran, S.P.; Ercisli, S.; Eyduran, E. Organic acids, sugars, phenolic compounds, and some horticultural characteristics of black and white mulberry accessions from Eastern Anatolia. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2016, 96, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ercisli, S.; Tosun, M.; Duralija, B.; Voca, S.; Sengul, M.; Turan, M. Phytochemical content of some black (Morus nigra L.) and purple (Morus rubra L.) mulberry genotypes. Food Technol. Biotecnol. 2010, 48, 102–106. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hadeel, A.G.; Hiba, F.A.; Refa’t, A.A.K.; Marwan, M.M.; Tawfiq, A.A.; Salma, M.A.Q. Effect of different extraction solvents on the antioxidant content and capacity of nine seasonal fruits. Clin. Nutr. Open Sci. 2021, 38, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  43. Maria, G.A.; Riccardo, N. Citrus bergamia, Risso: The peel, the juice and the seed oil of the bergamot fruit of Reggio Calabria (South Italy). Emir. J. Food Agric. 2020, 32, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liang, J.; Ren, Y.; Wang, Y.; Han, M.; Yue, T.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Z. Physicochemical, nutritional, and bioactive properties of pulp and peel from 15 kiwifruit cultivars. Food Biosci. 2021, 42, 101157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Panuccio, M.R.; Papalia, T.; Attinà, E.; Giuffrè, A.; Muscolo, A. Use of digestate as an alternative to mineral fertilizer: Effects on growth and crop quality. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019, 65, 700–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. He, R.; Gao, M.; Shi, R.; Song, S.; Zhang, Y.; Su, W.; Liu, H. The Combination of Selenium and LED Light Quality Affects Growth and Nutritional Properties of Broccoli Sprouts. Molecules 2020, 25, 4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hegedus, A.; Balogh, E.; Engel, R.; Sipos, B.Z.; Papp, J.; Blazovics, A.; Stefanovits-Banyai, E. Comparative nutrient element and antioxidant characterization of berry fruit species and cultivars grown in Hungary. Hort. Sci. 2008, 43, 1711–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Dogan, H.; Ercisli, S.; Jurikova, T.; Temim, E.; Leto, A.; Hadziabulic, A.; Tosun, M.; Narmanlioglu, H.K.; Zia-Ul-Haq, M. Physicochemical and antioxidant characteristics of fruits of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) from Turkey. Oxid. Commun. 2014, 37, 1005–1014. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gundogdu, M.; Ozrenk, K.; Ercisli, S.; Kan, T.; Kodad, O.; Hegedus, A. Organic acids, sugars, vitamin C content and some pomological characteristics of eleven hawthorn species (Crataegus spp.) from Turkey. Biol. Res. 2014, 47, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gecer, M.K.; Kan, T.; Gundogdu, M.; Ercisli, S.; Ilhan, G.; Sagbas, H.I. Physicochemical characteristics of wild and cultivated apricots (Prunus armeniacaL.) from Aras valley in Turkey. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2020, 67, 935–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kaskoniene, V.; Bimbiraite-Surviliene, K.; Kaskonas, P.; Tiso, N.; Cesoniene, L.; Daubaras, R.; Maruska, A.S. Changes in the biochemical compounds of Vaccinium myrtillus, Vaccinium vitis-idaea, and forest litter collected from various forest types. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2020, 44, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution areas of mulberry genotypes around Van Lake.
Figure 1. Distribution areas of mulberry genotypes around Van Lake.
Sustainability 13 13507 g001
Figure 2. (a): Morus alba fruits, (b): Morus nigra fruits, (c): Morus rubra fruits.
Figure 2. (a): Morus alba fruits, (b): Morus nigra fruits, (c): Morus rubra fruits.
Sustainability 13 13507 g002
Figure 3. Correlation between mulberry species in terms of organic acid content.
Figure 3. Correlation between mulberry species in terms of organic acid content.
Sustainability 13 13507 g003
Figure 4. Correlation between mulberry species in terms of phenolic compounds.
Figure 4. Correlation between mulberry species in terms of phenolic compounds.
Sustainability 13 13507 g004
Table 1. Organic acid (mg 100 g−1) content of mulberry landraces in the central district of Van.
Table 1. Organic acid (mg 100 g−1) content of mulberry landraces in the central district of Van.
SpeciesLandracesMalic Acid Citric AcidSuccinic Acid Tartaric Acid Fumaric Acid Vitamin C
M. rubra65VN012.585 ± 0.003 f,*2.238 ± 0.002 d0.887 ± 0.005 f0.101 ± 0.002 i0.083 ±0.003 f20.179 ± 0.004 a
65VN023.356 ± 0.003 d1.941 ± 0.009 e1.009 ± 0.002 e0.159 ± 0.001 e0.109 ± 0.001 d15.357 ± 0.010 c
65VN032.967 ± 0.001 e1.894 ± 0.002 f1.014 ± 0.005 de0.197 ± 0.001 b0.098 ± 0.002 e15.276 ± 0.005 c
65VN041.973 ± 0.003 j0.771 ± 0.007 i0.654 ± 0.004 i0.181 ± 0.004 c0.048 ± 0.002 i11.465 ± 0.007 f
M. alba65VN052.304 ± 0.004 g1.719 ± 0.006 h0.666 ± 0.005 h0.124 ± 0.002 g0.145 ± 0.005 b10.009 ± 0.007 g
65VN062.104 ± 0.002 i1.868 ± 0.005 g0.838 ± 0.002 g0.189 ± 0.003 d0.096 ± 0.002 e18.055 ± 0.007 b
65VN074.074 ± 0.009 c3.937 ± 0.004 a1.667 ±0.004 a0.210 ± 0.002 a0.117 ± 0.003 c13.015 ± 0.013 e
65VN084.578 ± 0.005 b3.139 ± 0.008 c1.036 ± 0.003 c0.141 ± 0.001 f0.075 ± 0.002 g14.042 ± 0.015 d
65VN095.725 ± 0.003 a3.621 ± 0.002 b1.018 ± 0.003 d0.106 ± 0.002 h0.433 ± 0.002 a9.050 ± 0.007 h
M. nigra65VN102.233 ± 0.006 h0.717 ± 0.002 j1.127 ±0.006 b0.126 ± 0.002 g0.057 ± 0.002 h12.552 ± 0.490 e
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 2. Organic acid (mg 100 g−1) content of mulberry landraces in the Gevaş District of Van.
Table 2. Organic acid (mg 100 g−1) content of mulberry landraces in the Gevaş District of Van.
SpeciesLandracesMalic Acid Citric AcidSuccinic Acid Tartaric Acid Fumaric Acid Vitamin C
M. rubra65GV017.576 ± 0.008 b,*2.710 ± 0.010 a0.208 ± 0.003 h0.132 ± 0.004 g0.115 ± 0.002 i15.018 ± 0.014 e
65GV027.918 ± 0.012 a1.605 ± 0.003 d0.216 ± 0.003 g0.112 ± 0.004 h0.274 ± 0.004 e14.285 ± 0.011 g
M. alba65GV036.848 ± 0.006 f2.543 ± 0.004 b0.106 ± 0.001 l0.231 ± 0.003 d0.482 ± 0.007 a15.157 ± 0.012 d
65GV045.753 ± 0.005 g1.017 ± 0.008 e0.153 ± 0.002 i0.170 ± 0.002 e0.333 ± 0.004 d13.269 ± 0.010 h
65GV054.559 ± 0.007 h2.118 ± 0.006 c0.349 ± 0.004 d0.169 ± 0.005 e0.140 ± 0.004 h9.009 ± 0.008 k
65GV063.157 ± 0.006 i2.495 ± 0.004 b0.758 ± 0.006 a0.440 ± 0.006 b0.409 ± 0.021 b11.553 ± 0.011 i
65GV073.093 ± 0.005 k2.458 ± 0.211 b0.322 ± 0.002 f0.291 ± 0.001 c0.134 ± 0.005 h11.019 ± 0.011 j
65GV083.106 ± 0.005 j2.657 ± 0.004 a 0.341 ± 0.003 e0.435 ± 0.005 b0.185 ± 0.004 f16.882 ± 0.010 b
65GV092.981 ± 0.005 l2.523 ± 0.002 b0.393 ± 0.005 c0.601 ± 0.001 a0.391 ± 0.002 c17.277 ± 0.006 a
65GV107.206 ± 0.006 e1.698 ± 0.003 d0.483 ± 0.003 b0.103 ± 0.001 i0.162 ± 0.002 g15.016 ± 0.009 f
M. nigra65GV117.227 ± 0.010 d0.770 ± 0.003 f0.124 ± 0.002 k0.136 ± 0.003 f,g0.172 ± 0.005 g8.886 ± 0.010 l
65GV127.452 ± 0.006 c1.011 ± 0.003 e0.140 ± 0.010 j0.140 ± 0.003 f0.083 ± 0.001 j15.354 ± 0.007 c
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 3. Organic acid (mg 100 g−1) content of mulberry landraces in the Adilcevaz District of Bitlis.
Table 3. Organic acid (mg 100 g−1) content of mulberry landraces in the Adilcevaz District of Bitlis.
SpeciesLandracesMalic Acid Citric AcidSuccinic Acid Tartaric Acid Fumaric Acid Vitamin C
M.rubra13AD013.392 ± 0.003 h,*1.373 ± 0.006 n0.148 ± 0.002 h0.099 ± 0.002 l0.038 ±0.001 k21.387 ± 0.009 b
13AD022.769 ± 0.006 o2.280 ± 0.006 h0.264 ± 0.001 d0.109 ± 0.002 k0.028 ± 0.000 m12.179 ± 0.005 l
13AD033.678 ± 0.007 g2.009 ± 0.007 j0.155 ± 0.000 g0.116 ± 0.001 j0.025 ± 0.001 n11.021 ± 0.013 o
13AD042.755 ± 0.005 p1.114 ± 0.003 s0.153 ± 0.004 g0.123 ± 0.002 i0.022 ± 0.002 n13.149 ± 0.004 j
13AD053.051 ± 0.002 k1.159 ± 0.002 p0.074 ± 0.001 m0.158 ± 0.002 e0.023 ± 0.000 n13.127 ± 0.010 j
13AD062.886 ± 0.003 n0.999 ± 0.003 u0.152 ± 0.002 g0.130 ± 0.003 h0.016 ± 0.000 o9.566 ± 0.014 s
13AD073.358 ± 0.005 i2.581 ± 0.003 f0.101 ± 0.002 l0.159 ± 0.005 e0.062 ± 0.000 h10.017 ± 0.008 r
13AD083.786 ± 0.004 e2.366 ± 0.006 g0.114 ± 0.004 j0.171 ± 0.002 c0.164 ± 0.004 e10.884 ± 0.008 p
13AD092.443 ± 0.003 r1.144 ± 0.005 r0.106 ± 0.001 k0.200 ± 0.002 b0.323 ± 0.003 b18.084 ± 0.084 f
13AD103.762 ± 0.007 f3.077 ± 0.003 d0.367 ± 0.003 b0.377 ± 0.003 a0.176 ± 0.004 d13.382 ± 0.008 i
13AD114.067 ± 0.007 c3.335 ± 0.005 b0.174 ± 0.004 e0.139 ± 0.003 g0.250 ± 0.001 c11.016 ± 0.007 o
13AD122.927 ± 0.008 m1.528 ± 0.005 m0.122 ± 0.003 i0.139 ± 0.001 g0.051 ± 0.000 j11.162 ± 0.005 n
13AD132.222 ± 0.008 t1.828 ± 0.007 k0.168 ± 0.001 f0.113 ± 0.004 j0.120 ± 0.001 g21.191 ± 0.009 c
13AD142.321 ± 0.003 s2.883 ± 0.002 e0.113 ± 0.003 j0.167 ± 0.002 d0.061 ± 0.001 hi20.021 ± 0.018 d
M. alba13AD153.919 ± 0.005 d3.259 ± 0.004 c0.461 ± 0.005 a0.199 ± 0.003 b0.439 ± 0.003 a24.077 ± 0.008 a
13AD166.230 ± 0.003 a3.679 ± 0.005 a0.287 ± 0.003 c0.085 ± 0.000 n0.155 ± 0.003 f15.078 ± 0.006 h
M. nigra13AD172.773 ± 0.006 o1.722 ± 0.004 l0.103 ± 0.000 k,l0.094 ± 0.001 m0.036 ± 0.000 k19.085 ± 0.013 e
13AD184.233 ± 0.006 b1.064 ± 0.005 t0.075 ± 0.002 m0.199 ± 0.003 b0.064 ± 0.001 h16.746 ± 0.008 g
13AD193.330 ± 0.009 j2.134 ± 0.005 i0.067 ± 0.001 n0.129 ± 0.002 h0.059 ± 0.001 i12.021 ± 0.013 m
13AD202.989 ± 0.006 l1.320 ± 0.004 o0.074 ± 0.002 m0.150 ± 0.003 f0.032 ± 0.000 l13.074 ± 0.012 k
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 4. Organic acids (mg 100 g−1) content of mulberry landraces in the Ahlat District of Bitlis.
Table 4. Organic acids (mg 100 g−1) content of mulberry landraces in the Ahlat District of Bitlis.
SpeciesLandracesMalic Acid Citric AcidSuccinic Acid Tartaric Acid Fumaric Acid Vitamin C
M. rubra13AH011.708 ± 0.003 m,*0.938 ± 0.005 l0.152 ± 0.005 i0.105 ± 0.002 e0.035 ± 0.001 k12.128 ± 0.003 f
13AH026.414 ± 0.010 c0.855 ± 0.004 m0.103 ± 0.002 j0.098 ± 0.001 f0.019 ± 0.001l14.332 ± 0.015 e
13AH032.006 ± 0.005 k1.395 ± 0.002 g0.334 ± 0.005 d0.313 ± 0.006 a0.096 ± 0.002 g10.749 ± 0.006 g
13AH042.878 ± 0.003 j2.781 ± 0.005 f0.344 ± 0.004 c0.147 ± 0.002 d0.112 ± 0.002 d15.156 ± 0.994 d
13AH055.009 ± 0.008 g4.987 ± 0.004 b0.294 ± 0.002 e0.269 ± 0.007 b0.091 ± 0.002 h18.173 ± 0.003 b
M. alba13AH061.984 ± 0.004 l1.210 ± 0.007 i0.336 ± 0.005 d0.314 ± 0.002 a0.196 ± 0.002 b16.113 ± 0.006 c
13AH074.560 ± 0.008 h1.118 ± 0.002 j0.546 ± 0.004 a0.172 ± 0.002 c0.213 ± 0.001 a20.213 ± 0.008 a
13AH083.959 ± 0.003 i1.011 ±0.003 k0.284 ± 0.002 f0.100 ± 0.001 ef0.103 ± 0.003 f16.157 ± 0.006 c
13AH096.024 ± 0.005 e1.232 ± 0.003 h0.422 ± 0.003 b0.313 ± 0.003 a0.109 ± 0.001 e10.669 ± 0.007 g
13AH105.457 ± 0.006 f3.979 ± 0.001 e0.203 ± 0.004 h0.077 ± 0.001 g0.069 ± 0.001 i11.140 ± 0.006 g
13AH117.122 ± 0.005 b4.322 ± 0.005 c0.288 ± 0.003 f0.096 ± 0.001 f0.098 ± 0.001 g9.641 ± 0.007 h
13AH127.228 ± 0.006 a4.017 ± 0.006 d0.349 ± 0.002 c0.073 ± 0.003 g,h0.175 ± 0.001 c11.079 ± 0.012 g
13AH136.323 ± 0.007 d5.023 ± 0.006 a0.216 ± 0.004 g0.069 ± 0.000 h0.063 ± 0.001 j10.019 ± 0.018 h
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 5. Protocatechuic, vanillic, rutin, quercetin, gallic, and catechin content of mulberry landraces in the Central District of Van (mg g−1).
Table 5. Protocatechuic, vanillic, rutin, quercetin, gallic, and catechin content of mulberry landraces in the Central District of Van (mg g−1).
SpeciesLandracesProtocatechuicVanillicRutinQuercetin Gallic Catechin
M. rubra65VN010.074 ± 0.002 h,*0.041 ± 0.000 f0.653 ± 0.002 d0.152 ± 0.001 a0.120 ± 0.002 e0.038 ± 0.000 e
65VN020.182 ± 0.006 c0.125 ± 0.001 d0.694 ± 0.003 c0.145 ± 0.001 b0.108 ± 0.003 f0.319 ± 0.262 a
65VN030.327 ± 0.002 a0.350 ± 0.006 a2.070 ± 0.003 a0.144 ± 0.001 b0.097 ± 0.002 g0.111 ± 0.002 c
65VN040.233 ± 0.003 b0.201 ± 0.003 c1.432 ± 0.006 b0.155 ± 0.003 a0.153 ± 0.001 d0.251 ± 0.001 b
M. alba65VN050.084 ± 0.002 f0.096 ± 0.004 e0.128 ± 0.004 g0.132 ± 0.004 c0.156 ± 0.001 c0.056 ± 0.002 d
65VN060.078 ± 0.001 g,h0.095 ± 0.002 e0.155 ± 0.003 f0.143 ± 0.002 b0.153 ± 0.003 d0.021 ± 0.000 f
65VN070.080 ± 0.001 f,g0.090 ± 0.003 e0.115 ± 0.003 h0.134 ± 0.001 c0.171 ± 0.001 a0.017 ± 0.000 f
65VN080.090 ± 0.001 e0.090 ± 0.003 e0.153 ± 0.004 f0.136 ± 0.001 c0.165 ± 0.001 b0.019 ± 0.001 f
65VN090.103 ± 0.007 d0.094 ± 0.002 e0.125 ± 0.001 g0.135 ± 0.002 c0.166 ± 0.001 b0.015 ± 0.000 f
M. nigra65VN100.079 ± 0.003 f,g,h0.270 ± 0.007 b0.511 ± 0.006 e0.133 ± 0.002 c0.164 ± 0.000 b0.035 ± 0.002 e
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 6. Chlorogenic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and phlorizin content of mulberry landraces in the Central District of Van (mg g−1).
Table 6. Chlorogenic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and phlorizin content of mulberry landraces in the Central District of Van (mg g−1).
SpeciesLandracesChlorogenicCaffeicSyringicp-CoumaricFerulicPhlorizin
M. rubra65VN010.101 ± 0.002 e,*0.226 ± 0.002 d0.140 ± 0.002 c0.088 ± 0.001 b,c0.095 ± 0.004 a0.026 ± 0.001 b
65VN021.240 ± 0.001 c0.227 ± 0.003 c0.145 ± 0.002 b0.089 ± 0.003 b0.094 ± 0.001 a,b0.022 ± 0.001 c
65VN033.778 ± 0.011 a0.451 ± 0.006 a0.122 ± 0.001 f0.097 ± 0.001 a0.091 ± 0.001 a,b0.033 ± 0.000 a
65VN041.136 ± 0.018 c0.248 ± 0.002 c0.120 ± 0.002 fg0.085 ± 0.001 c,d0.092 ± 0.003 a,b0.019 ± 0.000 d
M. alba65VN050.145 ± 0.002 e0.099 ± 0.004 f0.118 ± 0.001 g0.089 ± 0.004 b0.090 ± 0.001 b0.011 ± 0.001 f,g
65VN060.662 ± 0.538 d0.115 ± 0.004 e0.123 ± 0.001 f0.083 ± 0.001 d0.090 ± 0.002 b0.011 ± 0.001 f,g
65VN070.103 ± 0.001 e0.088 ± 0.003 g0.135 ± 0.001 d0.079 ± 0.001 e,f0.094 ± 0.002 a,b0.011 ± 0.001 f,g
65VN080.105 ± 0.002 e0.098 ± 0.001 f0.155 ± 0.004 a0.076 ± 0.000 f0.095 ± 0.005 a0.012 ± 0.001 f,g
65VN090.135 ± 0.002 e0.101 ± 0.003 f0.126 ± 0.003 e0.082 ± 0.001 d,e0.091 ± 0.003 a,b0.011 ± 0.001 f,g
M. nigra65VN101.778 ± 0.004 b0.356 ± 0.003 b0.122 ± 0.001 f0.095 ± 0.003 a0.091 ± 0.002 a,b0.016 ± 0.000 e
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 7. Protocatechuic, vanillic, rutin, quercetin, gallic and catechin content of mulberry landraces in the Gevaş District of Van (mg g−1).
Table 7. Protocatechuic, vanillic, rutin, quercetin, gallic and catechin content of mulberry landraces in the Gevaş District of Van (mg g−1).
SpeciesLandracesProtocatechuicVanillicRutinQuercetin Gallic Catechin
M. rubra65GV010.086 ± 0.002 e,f,*0.096 ± 0.001 d2.557 ± 0.011 d0.136 ± 0.004 f,g0.154 ± 0.001 b0.059 ± 0.001 c
65GV020.080 ± 0.001 g,h0.089 ± 0.002 e0.144 ± 0.003 h,i0.146 ± 0.001 d,e0.163 ± 0.002 b0.015 ± 0.000 i
M. alba65GV030.090 ± 0.002 c,d0.091 ± 0.001 e0.150 ± 0.001 h0.142 ± 0.001 e0.096 ± 0.001 c0.032 ± 0.001 e
65GV040.087 ± 0.001 d,e0.091 ± 0.001 e0.190 ± 0.003 g0.131 ± 0.002 g0.047 ± 0.002 d,e0.020 ± 0.002 h
65GV050.086 ± 0.001 e,f0.089 ± 0.001 e0.135 ± 0.004 i,j0.149 ± 0.002 d0.084 ± 0.069 c0.011 ± 0.000 j
65GV060.104 ± 0.005 a0.091 ± 0.003 e0.380 ± 0.001 e0.176 ± 0.005 c0.019 ± 0.001 e0.026 ± 0.001 f
65GV070.096 ± 0.001 b0.090 ± 0.001 e0.216 ± 0.004 f0.141 ± 0.005 e,f0.151 ± 0.001 b0.014 ± 0.000 i
65GV080.094 ± 0.003 b,c0.090 ± 0.002 e0.158 ± 0.008 h0.143 ± 0.002 d,e0.063 ± 0.003 c,d0.090 ± 0.000 a
65GV090.078 ± 0.001 h0.090 ± 0.001 e0.128 ± 0.002 j0.143 ± 0.003 e0.303 ± 0.001 a0.021 ± 0.000 h
65GV100.097 ± 0.002 b0.108 ± 0.001 b3.882 ± 0.017 b0.225 ± 0.005 b0.153 ± 0.003 b0.078 ± 0.002 b
M. nigra65GV110.083 ± 0.002 f,g0.115 ± 0.002 a3.903 ± 0.011 a0.297 ± 0.007 a0.163 ± 0.001 b0.054 ± 0.003 d
65GV120.090 ± 0.002 c,d0.101 ± 0.002 c2.763 ± 0.014 c0.176 ± 0.002 c0.153 ± 0.001 b0.023 ± 0.000 g
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 8. Chlorogenic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and phlorizin content of mulberry landraces in the Gevaş District of Van (mg g−1).
Table 8. Chlorogenic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and phlorizin content of mulberry landraces in the Gevaş District of Van (mg g−1).
SpeciesLandracesChlorogenicCaffeicSyringicp-CoumaricFerulicPhlorizin
M. rubra65GV011.632 ± 0.003 c,*0.121 ± 0.001 d,e0.118 ± 0.003 g0.081 ± 0.001 b0.093 ± 0.003 b0.042 ± 0.001 e
65GV021.360 ± 0.005 f0.116 ± 0.003 f,g0.138 ± 0.001 a0.081 ± 0.004 b0.094 ± 0.005 b0.033 ± 0.001 f
M. alba65GV031.329 ± 0.011 g0.130 ± 0.005 c0.142 ± 0.001 a0.077 ± 0.000 b0.095 ± 0.006 b0.081 ± 0.001 b
65GV041.247 ± 0.036 i0.124 ± 0.002 d0.122 ± 0.002 e 0.083 ± 0.001 b0.524 ± 0.426 a0.019 ± 0.000 h
65GV051.366 ± 0.003 f0.122 ± 0.003 d0.129 ± 0.004c 0.425 ± 0.345 a0.090 ± 0.001 b0.016 ± 0.001 i
65GV061.411 ± 0.006 e0.136 ± 0.005 b0.127 ± 0.003 d 0.091 ± 0.001 b0.095 ± 0.005 b0.025 ± 0.002 g
65GV071.332 ± 0.001 g0.112 ± 0.000 g,h0.133 ± 0.002 b0.087 ± 0.001 b0.092 ± 0.002 b0.013 ± 0.002 j
65GV081.486 ± 0.012 d0.109 ± 0.001 h0.124 ± 0.004 d,e 0.082 ± 0.002 b0.091 ± 0.001 b0.017 ± 0.000 i
65GV091.286 ± 0.013 h0.117 ± 0.001 e,f0.133 ± 0.005 b0.079 ± 0.003 b0.094 ± 0.004 b0.014 ± 0.001 j
65GV100.988 ± 0.004 j0.134 ± 0.001 b,c0.120 ± 0.002 f,g0.123 ± 0.002 b0.092 ± 0.003 b0.166 ± 0.001 a
M. nigra65GV112.314 ± 0.006 b0.137 ± 0.001 b0.131 ± 0.001 b,c0.091 ± 0.003 b0.095 ± 0.000 b0.073 ± 0.001 c
65GV123.526 ± 0.003 a0.160 ± 0.002 a0.131 ± 0.004 b,c0.079 ± 0.002 b0.093 ± 0.002 b0.058 ± 0.001 d
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 9. Protocatechuic, vanillic, rutin, quercetin, gallic, and catechin content of mulberry landraces in the Adilcevaz District of Bitlis (mg g−1).
Table 9. Protocatechuic, vanillic, rutin, quercetin, gallic, and catechin content of mulberry landraces in the Adilcevaz District of Bitlis (mg g−1).
SpeciesLandracesProtocatechuicVanillicRutinQuercetin Gallic Catechin
M. rubra13AD010.023 ± 0.003 j,*0.078 ± 0.002 h1.914 ± 0.011 d0.055 ± 0.003 e0.153 ± 0.002 b,c,d0.070 ± 0.002 i
13AD020.016 ± 0.001 k,l0.016 ± 0.001 j2.523 ± 0.022 a0.044 ± 0.002 e,f0.158 ± 0.003 b,c0.146 ± 0.003 c
13AD030.011 ± 0.001 l0.033 ± 0.001 i,j1.047 ± 0.047 g,h0.038 ± 0.002 e,f0.155 ± 0.001 b,c,d0.051 ± 0.001 k
13AD040.022 ± 0.001 j0.065 ± 0.002 h,i0.882 ± 0.009 i0.012 ± 0.000 f0.158 ± 0.004 b,c0.052 ± 0.001 j,k
13AD050.055 ± 0.003 g0.286 ± 0.007 a1.459 ± 0.016 e0.063 ± 0.001 e0.154 ± 0.000 b,c,d0.103 ± 0.001 e,f
13AD060.029 ± 0.013 i0.232 ± 0.100 b,c0.907 ± 0.392 h,i0.185 ± 0.080 a,b0.273 ± 0.118 a0.063 ± 0.027 I,j
13AD070.083 ± 0.001 f0.193 ± 0.002 c,d0.928 ± 0.025 h,i0.162 ± 0.002 b,c,d0.156 ± 0.001 b,c,d0.050 ± 0.001 k
13AD080.084 ± 0.003 f0.215 ± 0.013 c,d1.997 ± 0.039 c,d0.137 ± 0.003 d0.146 ± 0.003 b,c,d0.158 ± 0.001 b
13AD090.103 ± 0.003 c0.123 ± 0.002 f,g1.188 ± 0.009 f,g0.144 ± 0.005 c,d0.156 ± 0.003 b,c,d0.124 ± 0.000 d
13AD100.085 ± 0.001 e,f0.094 ± 0.002 g,h1.126 ± 0.013 f,g0.136 ± 0.004 d0.107 ± 0.003 c,d,e0.096 ± 0.000 f,g
13AD110.107 ± 0.002 c0.088 ± 0.003 g,h2.129 ± 0.027 c0.150 ± 0.008 c,d0.154 ± 0.004 b,c,d0.152 ± 0.001 b,c
13AD120.226 ± 0.006 a0.173 ± 0.002 d,e0.182 ± 0.004 j0.177 ± 0.001 a,b,c0.097 ± 0.002 d,e0.084 ± 0.001 h
13AD130.189 ± 0.001 b0.175 ± 0.003 d,e1.461 ± 0.016 e0.148 ± 0.002 c,d0.157 ± 0.001 b,c0.131 ± 0.003 d
13AD140.090 ± 0.000 e0.087 ± 0.003 g,h0.122 ± 0.001 j0.143 ± 0.003 c,d0.252 ± 0.004 a0.027 ± 0.002 l
M. alba13AD150.097 ± 0.001 d0.091 ± 0.001 g,h0.176 ± 0.000 j0.150 ± 0.003 c,d0.163 ± 0.004 b,c0.065 ± 0.002 i
13AD160.060 ± 0.002 g0.064 ± 0.004 h,i1.509 ± 0.006 e0.062 ± 0.002 e0.160 ± 0.003 b,c0.123 ± 0.001 d
M. nigra13AD170.040 ± 0.000 h0.213 ± 0.003 c,d1.252 ± 0.015 f0.019 ± 0.000 f0.084 ± 0.069 e0.068 ± 0.001 i
13AD180.018 ± 0.000 j,k0.265 ± 0.005 a,b2.531 ± 0.016 a0.206 ± 0.004 a0.163 ± 0.001 b,c0.107 ± 0.003 e
13AD190.036 ± 0.001 h0.104 ± 0.004 g,h2.374 ± 0.000 b0.161 ± 0.007 b,c,d0.169 ± 0.004 b0.183 ± 0.002 a
13AD200.089 ± 0.002 ef0.150 ± 0.005 ef1.172 ± 0.011 fg0.137 ± 0.002 d0.153 ± 0.001 b,c,d0.092 ± 0.002 g,h
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 10. Chlorogenic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and phlorizin content of mulberry landraces in the Adilcevaz District of Bitlis (mg g−1).
Table 10. Chlorogenic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and phlorizin content of mulberry landraces in the Adilcevaz District of Bitlis (mg g−1).
SpeciesLandracesChlorogenicCaffeicSyringicp-CoumaricFerulicPhlorizin
M. rubra13AD011.560 ± 0.002 c,d,*0.183 ± 0.003 e,f0.118 ± 0.002 c,d0.084 ± 0.004 c,d,e0.101 ± 0.001 b0.057 ± 0.002 f,g
13AD020.547 ± 0.003 h,i0.087 ± 0.001 h0.094 ± 0.003 d,e0.082 ± 0.001 e0.110 ± 0.000 a,b0.042 ± 0.001 f,g
13AD030.931 ± 0.003 f,g0.213 ± 0.005 d,e0.115 ± 0.001 c,d0.088 ± 0.006 c,d,e0.095 ± 0.003 b0.070 ± 0.001 f,g
13AD041.225 ± 0.014 e0.385 ± 0.005 a0.075 ± 0.003 e0.089 ± 0.003 c,d,e0.094 ± 0.006 b0.069 ± 0.003 f,g
13AD051.949 ± 0.005 b0.310 ± 0.005 b,c0.119 ± 0.002 c,d0.107 ± 0.005 a,b,c,d0.091 ± 0.000 b0.032 ± 0.002 g
13AD061.333 ± 0.577 d,e0.300 ± 0.130 b,c0.202 ± 0.088 a0.120 ± 0.052 a0.128 ± 0.055 a0.356 ± 0.154 a
13AD071.453 ± 0.046 c,d0.263 ± 0.011 c,d0.125 ± 0.001 c,d0.095 ± 0.004 b,c,d,e0.094 ± 0.005 b0.207 ± 0.07 b,c,d
13AD082.461 ± 0.025 a0.352 ± 0.007 a,b0.118 ± 0.001 c,d0.107 ± 0.001 a,b,c0.089 ± 0.001 b0.239 ± 0.033 b,c
13AD090.745 ± 0.015 g,h0.187 ± 0.001 e,f0.144 ± 0.005 b,c0.090 ± 0.001 c,d,e0.091 ± 0.002 b0.206 ± 0.001 b,c,d
13AD100.328 ± 0.009 i,j0.113 ± 0.002 g,h0.130 ± 0.002 b,c,d0.096 ± 0.002 b,c,d,e0.095 ± 0.002 b0.253 ± 0.004 b
13AD110.111 ± 0.004 j0.092 ± 0.001 h0.123 ± 0.006 c,d0.077 ± 0.001 e0.094 ± 0.004 b0.160 ± 0.005 d,e
13AD121.164 ± 0.002 e,f0.216 ± 0.004 d,e0.122 ± 0.001 c,d0.087 ± 0.003 c,d,e0.095 ± 0.004 b0.185 ± 0.002 c,d
13AD130.966 ± 0.041 f,g0.202 ± 0.005 e,f0.122 ± 0.002 c,d0.094 ± 0.003 c,d,e0.091 ± 0.001 b0.178 ± 0.004 c,d
13AD140.106 ± 0.002 j0.089 ± 0.001 h0.120 ± 0.001 c,d0.076 ± 0.002 e0.099 ± 0.001 b0.108 ± 0.001 e,f
M. alba13AD150.110 ± 0.008 j0.094 ± 0.001 h0.127 ± 0.001 b,c,d0.079 ± 0.000 e0.097 ± 0.002 b0.151 ± 0.001 d,e
13AD160.545 ± 0.004 h,i0.086 ± 0.001 h0.119 ± 0.001 c,d0.024 ± 0.000 f0.094 ± 0.002 b0.085 ± 0.005 f,g
M. nigra13AD171.526 ± 0.014 c,d0.268 ± 0.002 c0.021 ± 0.000 f0.083 ± 0.001 e0.093 ± 0.002 b0.073 ± 0.002 f,g
13AD181.637 ± 0.009 c0.351 ± 0.005 a,b0.162 ± 0.003 b0.117 ± 0.002 a,b0.090 ± 0.002 b0.175 ± 0.002 c,d
13AD190.556 ± 0.004 h,i0.151 ± 0.001 f,g0.120 ± 0.002 c,d0.084 ± 0.004 d,e0.091 ± 0.001 b0.079 ± 0.000 f,g
13AD200.994 ± 0.004 f0.199 ± 0.005 ef0.127 ± 0.003 b,c,d0.097 ± 0.001 b,c,d,e0.087 ± 0.004 b0.040 ± 0.001 f,g
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 11. Protocatechuic, vanillic, rutin, quercetin, gallic, and catechin content of mulberry landraces in the Ahlat District of Bitlis (mg g−1).
Table 11. Protocatechuic, vanillic, rutin, quercetin, gallic, and catechin content of mulberry landraces in the Ahlat District of Bitlis (mg g−1).
SpeciesLandracesProtocatechuicVanillicRutinQuercetin Gallic Catechin
M. rubra13AH010.103 ± 0.003 c,*0.145 ± 0.005 c1.365 ± 0.014 c0.095 ± 0.005 h0.147 ± 0.008 h0.102 ± 0.004 h
13AH020.083 ± 0.003 e,f0.601 ± 0.001 a1.705 ± 0.014 b0.125 ± 0.005 g0.159 ± 0.001 g0.123 ± 0.001 g
13AH030.136 ± 0.007 a0.205 ± 0.005 b0.875 ± 0.020 d0.182 ± 0.004 b0.155 ± 0.005 gh0.164 ± 0.001 d
13AH040.136 ± 0.004 a0.145 ± 0.004 c2.229 ± 0.077 a0.144 ± 0.003 e0.147 ± 0.007 h0.185 ± 0.001 c
13AH050.088 ± 0.002 d,e0.089 ± 0.001 e0.531 ± 0.000 e0.131 ± 0.001 f,g0.192 ± 0.012 e0.025 ± 0.001 i
M. alba13AH060.117 ± 0.002 b0.090 ± 0.001 e0.144 ± 0.001 h0.134 ± 0.004 f0.147 ± 0.007 h0.015 ± 0.000 j
13AH070.087 ± 0.002 d,e0.099 ± 0.006 d0.177 ± 0.017 h0.155 ± 0.002 d0.175 ± 0.005 f0.250 ± 0.002 b
13AH080.086 ± 0.001 d,e0.090 ± 0.001 e0.240 ± 0.003 g0.130 ± 0.002 f,g0.152 ± 0.000 gh0.266 ± 0.003 a
13AH090.079 ± 0.003 f,g0.090 ± 0.003 e0.174 ± 0.006 h0.133 ± 0.002 f,g0.326 ± 0.003 a0.269 ± 0.002 a
13AH100.115 ± 0.002 b0.091 ± 0.005 e0.167 ± 0.008 h0.129 ± 0.001 f,g0.241 ± 0.001 d0.134 ± 0.004 e
13AH110.088 ± 0.003 d,e0.089 ± 0.000 e0.246 ± 0.003 g0.133 ± 0.003 f,g0.320 ± 0.002 a0.164 ± 0.002 d
13AH120.078 ± 0.001 g0.089 ± 0.001 e0.179 ± 0.006 h0.278 ± 0.012 a0.306 ± 0.006 b0.125 ± 0.001 f,g
13AH130.091 ± 0.001 d0.091 ± 0.001 e0.428 ± 0.007 f0.170 ± 0.001 c0.252 ± 0.002 c0.128 ± 0.004 f
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 12. Chlorogenic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic and phlorizin content of mulberry landraces in the Ahlat District of Bitlis (mg g−1).
Table 12. Chlorogenic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic and phlorizin content of mulberry landraces in the Ahlat District of Bitlis (mg g−1).
SpeciesLandracesChlorogenicCaffeicSyringicp-CoumaricFerulicPhlorizin
M. rubra13AH012.145 ± 0.015 c,*0.245 ± 0.006 a0.113 ± 0.003 e,f0.115 ± 0.005 a0.100 ± 0.002 a0.061 ± 0.002 f
13AH026.246 ± 0.046 a0.251 ± 0.009 a0.109 ± 0.009 f0.087 ± 0.008 c,d,e0.093 ± 0.004 a0.066 ± 0.002 f
13AH036.076 ± 0.592 a0.208 ± 0.008 b0.142 ± 0.011 a0.094 ± 0.004 b,c0.095 ± 0.005 a0.200 ± 0.007 b
13AH045.068 ± 0.797 b0.171 ± 0.007 c0.119 ± 0.001 d,e0.094 ± 0.001 b,c0.045 ± 0.045 b0.246 ± 0.008 a
13AH051.340 ± 0.038 d0.089 ± 0.003 f0.125 ± 0.006 c,d0.082 ± 0.001 d,e0.091 ± 0.001 a0.199 ± 0.005 b
M. alba13AH061.331 ± 0.057 d0.092 ± 0.005 e,f0.131 ± 0.005 b,c0.091 ± 0.009 b,c,d0.094 ± 0.003 a0.121 ± 0.009 e
13AH071.421 ± 0.049 d0.096 ± 0.001 d,e,f0.138 ± 0.002 a,b0.077 ± 0.008 e0.103 ± 0.011 a0.128 ± 0.001 de
13AH081.314 ± 0.062 d0.088 ± 0.001 f,g0.124 ± 0.006 c,d0.081 ± 0.004 d,e0.096 ± 0.002 a0.144 ± 0.005 c
13AH091.299 ± 0.045 d0.105 ± 0.006 d0.128 ± 0.005 c,d0.085 ± 0.006 c,d,e0.096 ± 0.002 a0.121 ± 0.001 e
13AH101.333 ± 0.011 d0.092 ± 0.008 e,f0.125 ± 0.002 c,d0.094 ± 0.004 b,c0.091 ± 0.001 a0.129 ± 0.005 de
13AH111.235 ± 0.003 d0.080 ± 0.000 g0.130 ± 0.000 b,c0.090 ± 0.001c,d0.092 ± 0.001 a0.135 ± 0.007 d
13AH121.414 ± 0.058 d0.090 ± 0.001 f0.130 ± 0.006 b,c0.090 ± 0.001 c,d0.090 ± 0.001 a0.131 ± 0.003 d
13AH131.287 ± 0.025 d0.100 ± 0.001 d,e0.120 ± 0.001 d,e0.101 ± 0.009 b0.092 ± 0.001 a0.200 ± 0.000 b
* The difference among the means indicated with the same lower-case letter in columns was not significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Can, A.; Kazankaya, A.; Orman, E.; Gundogdu, M.; Ercisli, S.; Choudhary, R.; Karunakaran, R. Sustainable Mulberry (Morus nigra L., Morus alba L. and Morus rubra L.) Production in Eastern Turkey. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413507

AMA Style

Can A, Kazankaya A, Orman E, Gundogdu M, Ercisli S, Choudhary R, Karunakaran R. Sustainable Mulberry (Morus nigra L., Morus alba L. and Morus rubra L.) Production in Eastern Turkey. Sustainability. 2021; 13(24):13507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413507

Chicago/Turabian Style

Can, Ahmet, Ahmet Kazankaya, Erdal Orman, Muttalip Gundogdu, Sezai Ercisli, Ravish Choudhary, and Rohini Karunakaran. 2021. "Sustainable Mulberry (Morus nigra L., Morus alba L. and Morus rubra L.) Production in Eastern Turkey" Sustainability 13, no. 24: 13507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413507

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop