Next Article in Journal
Using Mobile Food Delivery Applications during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Examine Continuance Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainability of AI: The Case of Provision of Information to Consumers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 13
Issue 21
10.3390/su132112065
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fluoride Toxicity Limit—Can the Element Exert a Positive Effect on Plants?

by
Zbigniew Jarosz
and
Karolina Pitura
*
Institute of Horticulture Production, Subdepartment of Plant Nutrition, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 12065; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112065
Submission received: 30 September 2021 / Revised: 24 October 2021 / Accepted: 28 October 2021 / Published: 1 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition for Sustainable Agriculture)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The problem of fluoride toxicity to living organisms is the subject of many studies. Its effect, not always toxic, on the human organism has been well documented. However, although the phytotoxicity of the element has been proved, this issue is still being investigated. It seems to be still relevant due to the progressive pollution of the environment and fluoridation of water. Assuming that the source of food for humans is plants, the content of fluoride in fruits and vegetables is important for human health. In the available literature, fluoride has been demonstrated to be phytotoxic at the level of cell transformations, biometric plant parameters, development of resistance, and biochemical processes in plants. However, several studies have provided information on improvement of certain plant parameters, e.g., the length of roots or shoots, caused by low fluoride doses and improvement of respiratory indices. The aim of this study was to analyze changes caused in plants by exposure to fluoride and to determine its beneficial effects based on the latest literature reports. It was based on the latest knowledge from the last 8 years. Attempts were made to compare earlier research results with contemporary items. In conclusion, the analysis has shown that, although some sources provide information on the positive effect of small fluoride doses, the impact of this element requires further investigations, as has not been fully elucidated.

1. Introduction

Fluoride pollution of the environment is a serious problem of the modern world. This element, which is widely distributed in the ecosystem, exerts a considerable impact on all ecosystem components. The interest in fluoride dates back to the 17th century. Although it was not possible to determine its exact properties at that time, it was noticed that a combination of fluorspar with sulfuric acid was able to etch glass. Fluoride was isolated from potassium fluoride in 1886 by chemist Henri Ferdinad Moissan, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1906. The name of the element refers to its destructive properties. It comes from the Greek word ‘phthore’, which means ‘to destroy’ [1]. In turn, as shown by Tressaud [2], the name comes from the Latin word ‘fluo’, meaning ‘flow’ and the symbol of fluorine as F appeared in 1814, but until the second half of the 19th century, the symbol Fl was used. The element occurs naturally in water, plants, and soils [3,4,5]. Additionally, it migrates continuously between individual ecosystems, e.g., from water into soil, where it is consequently taken up by plants. Fluoride is in the 5th place in the hierarchy of environmental poisons [6], and the available literature presents ongoing studies on its beneficial and negative effects on the human organism. It is classified as a halogen and included in group VII A of the periodic table. Fluoride does not occur in the free state in nature. In water, it dissociates into the F− ion [7]. It has the highest electronegativity of all known elements; it is highly active and can form compounds with all chemical elements except oxygen, nitrogen, and lighter noble gases. The reactions of fluoride with hydrogen and hydrocarbons are usually explosive. In the nomenclature, two names for fluoride can be used interchangeably (fluorine and fluoride): fluorine is the name of the element and fluoride is its ion [8,9].

2. Fluoride Content in the Plant Root Zone

The WHO recommends that optimal dose of fluorine in drinking water as 1.5 mg F/L [10] but no information on the recommended content of fluoride in plants safe for human health was found. Water, soil, and air can be sources of fluoride for plants. However, since the root is the primary organ involved in the uptake of nutrients and undesirable substances by plants and fluoride contained in water reaches the soil during watering, the content of this element in the plant root zone seems to be especially important. There was a double increase in the fluorine content in soils over 50 years [11]. Long-term exposure to fluoride exceeding its limit value (>1.5 mg·L) was found to exert a detrimental effect on plants [12]. Fluoride compounds in soil are located mainly in the humus level, and its content depends mainly on the parent rock, compounds emitted by industrial plants, the use of phosphorus fertilizers and pesticides, or water fluoridation [13,14,15]. Water fluoridation in some countries has been carried out since 1940 [16]. In soil, the element occurs mainly as fluorapatite (Ca5(PO4)3F)), fluorite (CaF2), cryolite (Na3AlF6), topaz (Al2(SiO4)F2) [17], and granite biotites [18]. Fluoride is the 13th most abundant element and constitutes approximately 0.06–0.09% in the Earth’s crust [19,20,21]. Its average content in soil has been reported to be in the range from <10 to 1000 mg·kg−1 [22], 150–400 mg·kg−1, [23], or 625 mg·kg−1, with a 1.5% increase in clay soils [13], which contain 1000–3500 mg·kg−1 [24] or 750–1660 mg·kg−1 [25] of this element. Sandy soils are usually poor in fluoride, as it leaches into the soil profile [26]. The mobility of fluoride in soil depends on sorption properties, pH, and the content of calcium ions. Higher adsorption is noted in slightly acidic conditions. In acidic soils, it may be even tenfold higher than in alkaline soils [27]. It has been shown in some studies that the percentage of F adsorption increases with an increase in pH to 8 and then declines [28]. Addition of humus to the soil reduces the solubility of fluoride and its uptake by plants [29]. Fluorine ion remediation from the environment can take place in various ways, e.g., as phytoremediation (Figure 1 and Figure 2) [30,31].
Mitigating the toxic effect of fluoride on the plant is possible through the use of silicon nanoparticles. Nano-Si-priming successfully mitigated the molecular damage and increased the yield of rice grain by reducing the bioaccumulation of fluoride. Stimulated levels of non-enzymatic antioxidants such as anthocyanins, flavonoids, phenolic compounds and glutathione [32]. Biochar is organic material can also decrease the fluoride solubility, fluoride content of plant tissues, oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities [33]. Soil washing could be a viable alternative technology for the remediation of soils contaminated with fluoride. The highest fluoride removal results could obtain using 3 M HCl and HNO3 [34].

3. Fluoride in Plants–Uptake

Fluoride uptake from soil by plants proceeds via diffusion and is linearly correlated with the total activity of the fluoride anion in the soil solution. Plants usually do not take up the element in excessive amounts, as it is often present in soil in unavailable forms. However, soils contaminated with this element pose a problem [29]. Fluoride is absorbed by plant roots, transported via xylematic flow to transpiratory organs, and stored in leaves [35,36]. Saturation of cell walls with calcium ions has an impact on F ion filtering and limits the uptake of the element by the plant. Fluoride ions can also be absorbed through chloride channels [37]. Fluoride is found in the apoplast and sometimes a small amount is also found in plasmalemma or tonoplasts. Fluoride levels are low in shoots because the endoderm acts as an effective barrier. Fluoride reaches the vascular system through a non-selective route, bypassing the endoderm [38]. The uptake rate is influenced by the type of compounds of F− with other elements. HF compounds are taken up at the fastest rate, faster than compounds with aluminum or the fluoride anion. It has also been shown that the presence of aluminum in soil increases fluoride uptake [39]. As reported by Das et al. [40], at neutral pH, fluoride is easily bound in soil and is not available to plants. As mentioned above, the availability of calcium ions in soil is associated with formation of CaF2: fluoride is bound and is thus unavailable for plants [24]. Plant affinity for fluoride adsorption is a species-specific trait, which depends on the plant growth stage. The content of fluoride in plants ranges from 0.6 to 1 mg·100 g dry weight [41] or 1–10 µg/g dry weight [37]. Some plants are able to secrete fluoride in the form of fluoroacetate and vinyl fluoride [41]. Such plants as tea, spinach, cabbage, lettuce, and kale are fluoride hyperaccumulators. The fluoride content in leafy and root vegetables usually does not differ from that in cereals, except for spinach and onions [40]. The content of fluoride was estimated at 25.7 µg/g in spinach and 22.2 µg/g in onion [42]. Leafy vegetables tend to accumulate larger amounts of this element than root vegetables [43]. Agarval and Chauhan [44] reported an increase in the accumulation of fluoride in barley leaves in comparison with grains. Tea absorbs up to 20–30-fold greater amounts of fluoride from soil than other plants. The content of fluoride in tea can be as high as 100–200 mg·kg−1, with 98% of this amount accumulated especially in older leaves [45,46]. The accumulation of fluoride in tea leaves is correlated with the presence of Al in soils where tea is grown (acidic soils). This may be associated with Ca2+ and CaM ions involved in the aluminum ion pretreatment, which contribute to enhancement of accumulation of fluoride in tea leaves [47]. Considering the high concentration of fluoride in tea and its popularity, it is a source of fluoride for humans. Consumption tea can deliver fluoride exposure dose from 0.03 mg·kg−1 d−1 to 0.14 mg·kg−1 d−1 to the children and 0.01 mg·kg−1 d−1 to 0.06 mg·kg−1 d−1 to adults [46]. The adequate intake (AI) for F from all sources is set at 0.05 mg/day/kg body weight for all ages over 6 months [48]. Studies show regular tea consumption (5 cups a day) can represent up to 173% of the AI (for an adult weighing 70 kg) [49]. According to research. Esfehani et al. [50] the differences in fluoride content depending on the type of tea are presented in Table 1. However, Mochammad [51] marked fluoride contents of tea after 5 min ranged from 0.95 to 4.73 mg/L for black teas, from 0.70 to 1.00 mg/L for green teas.
The content of calcium in vegetables may increase fluoride accumulation due to the affinity of calcium ions for phosphorus. The amaranth, which is characterized by high content of calcium, was found to accumulate high concentrations of fluoride [52]. Antagonistic reactions between F and Cu concentrations in lettuce plants were reported by Senkondo et al. [53]. Roots of beet plants were reported to have a fluoride level of 3.41 at the soil content of 176 mg·dm−3 [54]. An almost 10-fold higher level of this element, i.e., 29.04 mg·kg−1, was reported in other studies [55]. A comparison of the content of fluoride in wheat, tomato, and potato plants cultivated in different parts of India showed the highest levels of this element in wheat (8.77 µg·g−1 vs. 2.85 µg·g−1 in tomatoes and 2.07 µg·g−1 in potatoes) [56]. In chamomile plants, the content of fluoride compounds was estimated at 0.03 mg F·dm−3 by Emekli-Alturfan et al. [57] and 3.19 mg F·kg−1 by Telesiński et al. [58], who analyzed various varieties of chamomile. Interesting research was reported by analyzing the content of fluoride in citrus and non-citrus fruits. The fluoride concentration in citrus fruits and non-citrus fruits was similar and ranged 0.04 ppm (Orange) to 0.18 ppm Guava [59]. Jaudenes et al. [60] and Zohoori et al. [61] in Table 2 summarizes the average levels of fluoride in selected fruits and vegetables. With a soil content of 20 mg F·kg, in the roots, leaves, shoots, pods, grains soybean, respectively, were recorded 1.90, 2.35, 1.32, 1.38, 1.03 (mg F·kg) [62].
The literature provides information on the use of various plant species as bioindicators of fluoride pollution of the environment, i.e., such indicator plants as Gladiolus, Tulipa, Crocus, Freesia hybrida, Hypericum perforatum, Larix, or Pinus [63]. An increase in fluoride concentrations in the air leads to emergence of necrotic lesions in the leaves of these plants. Fluoride is absorbed from the air through stomata, or fluoride dissolved in water enters the leaf interior through the epidermis. In the cell, fluoride is mainly present in cell walls and lower amounts are accumulated in chloroplasts, mitochondria, and ribosomes [41].

4. Effects of Fluoride on Plants

There is abundant information in the available literature on the toxic effects of fluoride on human and animal organisms. Plants are regarded as a source of food and, due to their content of fluoride compounds, a source of this element for humans. Fluoride uptake by plants is regarded as a marginal and non-hazardous process in the natural environment. Nevertheless, it is becoming an increasingly important concern in industrialized areas (fluoride emission into the air) or in areas watered with fluoridated water. Excessive exposure to fluoride compounds may cause irreversible biochemical and morphological changes in plants [56].

4.1. Visual Signs of Fluoride Phytotoxicity in Plants

The rate of emergence of signs of phytotoxic effects of fluoride in plants depends, e.g., on the intensity, exposure time, temperature, and type of light [64]. Plant exposure to excessive fluoride concentrations is first manifested by chlorosis and drying of lamina margins, which is followed by shedding of leaves. Necrosis causes plasmolysis and loss of palisade and spongy parenchyma cells. Fluorides also induce degradation of photosynthetic pigments, thereby inhibiting photosynthesis. HF leads to replacement of the magnesium atom with two hydrogen atoms in chlorophyll molecules [41,65]. A characteristic sign is tip burn as well as a visible sharp and dark line separating dead from living tissue. In Hypericum perforatum plants, NaF was initially found to cause wilting and produce a reddish-brown color of lamina margins, which consequently led to leaf death. Changes in the structure of chloroplasts and increased production of anthocyanins were detected as well [66]. The chloroplast structure degradation and the decrease in the chlorophyll content have been confirmed by other studies [38,67]. In another research in Cicer arietinum noted that carotenoid and chlorophyll a and b were stimulated at 1.0 and 2.5 mM NaF [64], however, opposite results were found in melon studies where fluoride levels reduced chlorophyll and carotenoids [68]. This thesis was also confirmed in other studies [69]. Riccinus communis is tolerant to a concentration of 1.5 and 3.0 mg KF·dm−3, visual signs of toxicity such as chlorosis and necrosis and changes in parenchyma tissues, cell collapse and phenolic compound at 4.5 mg KF·dm−3 [70].
Ornamental coniferous and deciduous trees and shrubs react to excessive levels of fluoride as well. The changes can be especially observed on trees in urban areas. In conifers, the natural level of fluoride in needles is 2 ÷ 12 mg/kg. Differences in the content of the element in needles are associated with their age (higher content in older needles). The phytotoxicity of fluoride manifests itself in brown discoloration of the leaf blade. In conifers, the spots are darker with brown-red to black color. It is assumed that coniferous trees are more sensitive to the effects of toxic compounds, e.g., fluoride, than deciduous trees [41,71].

4.2. Biochemical Changes in Plants

The content of fluoride in plant leaves induces changes in the activity of antioxidant enzymes and the content of flavonols, phenols, and ascorbic acid [63]. Hydrilla verticilata plants were immersed in solutions containing various concentrations of fluoride in the range of 0–40 mg·dm−3. The exposure of the plants to the concentration of 10 mg·dm−3 resulted in an increase in the content of chlorophyll, protein, and carbohydrates, in comparison with the control. In turn, an excess amount of fluoride (20 mg·dm−3) reduced the level of these parameters but increased the activity of guaiacol peroxidase and superoxide dismutase SOD and the amount of ascorbic acid (AsA) and glutathione (GSH) [72]. Fluoride-induced stress may result in conversion of glucose, fructose, and mannose in plant tissues into sucrose and raffinose. This process may represent a mechanism adopted by plants to reduce F toxicity [73]. A decline in germination rates, inhibition of root growth, and inhibition of catalase activity in the embryo and roots of winter wheat were induced by increasing concentrations of NaF in the medium [35]. F affects photosynthesis mainly by reducing chlorophyll synthesis, degrading chloroplasts and inhibiting the Hills reaction. The chlorophyll content is also reduced and the photosynthetic system of plants is weakened. Accumulation of F inhibit the photosystem-II (PS-II) electron transport rate followed by a subsequent increase in the photosystem-I (PS-I) electron transport rate [38].
Changes associated with fluoride phytotoxicity result in lower resistance and higher susceptibility of plants to infections and pathogens [74]. When air-borne fluoride is the source of pollution, its bioaccumulation in plants rises with the distance from the soil surface, with the highest accumulation recorded at a height of several meters. Hence, trees and shrubs are more vulnerable than shorter plants. Taxus baccata and Robinia pseudoacacia are regarded as pollution-resistant species. In some studies, HF was found to have a stimulating effect on the plant respiration process (fluoride concentration in the air of approx. 2 mg·m3) and to increase enzyme activity [41]. However, other studies have found this in ATP-forming organelles such as chloroplasts, mitochondria, and the plasma membrane, ATP synthase enzymes were found to be inhibited by accumulated F [38].

4.3. Ontogenetic Changes

Excess concentrations of fluoride have been reported to reduce the mass of plant roots and the length of roots and shoots. A study conducted by Pant et al. [75] reported inhibition of root growth and reduction of shoot length caused by 0.001, 0.01, and 0.02 M of sodium fluoride (NaF) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L.), mustard (Brassica juncea L.), and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L). This tendency was first observed after the application of 0.01 m NaF. Noteworthy, the application of the dose of 0.001 M resulted in an increase in the length of roots in the wheat, Bengal gram, and tomato, compared to the control, and an increase in the length of shoots in all species except wheat. The effect of watering with water contaminated with fluorine compounds on plant growth traits was observed in an experiment with rice (Oryza sativa L.). The plants exhibited higher accumulation of fluoride in roots than shoots, lower germination rates, and increased catalase activity [76]. Treatment of chickpea and barley seeds with different levels of NaF (1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mM) resulted in a clear percentage reduction in the germination rate, seedling emergence rate, and seed vigor index [77].

5. Changes in the Chemical Composition of Plants Induced by Fluoride

Cultivation of plants in soils contaminated with fluoride compounds exerts an impact on their chemical composition. Increased phosphorus content in black radish, air-dried yellow lupine mass, and spring triticale roots was observed after application of higher fluoride doses into the soil. Inverse relationships were noted in the case of maize roots [78]. The correlation between the presence of fluoride in soil and phosphorus uptake by plants was confirmed by Fung and Wong [79]. Negative correlations were found by Nagaraju et al. between fluoride and zinc in Arachis hypogaea stems, fluoride and lead in Phaseolus vulgaris leaves, and fluoride and zinc in Lycopersicon esculantum stems [80]. Solanum tuberosum is regarded to be highly resistant to increased fluoride concentrations in soil, which has been confirmed in some investigations. No signs of fluoride phytotoxicity were detected in potato plants growing in the presence of 0–190 mg NaF·kg−1 of the element in the soil. Nevertheless, the fresh mass of roots, shoots, and leaves was reduced [40]. The phytotoxicity threshold in the onion shoot was estimated at 55 mg NaF·kg−1, i.e., a value that resulted in a 50% biomass reduction. Concurrently, greater accumulation of fluoride was noted in onion roots and shoots than in bulbs [81]. Erodium glaucophyllum in response to fluoride stress shortens its vegetation period and Rantherium suaveolens stores fluoride in dead tissues. The stress reaction of these plants was also higher accumulation of calcium in the leaves [82].

6. Conclusions

Fluoride is toxic to plants. Its excessive accumulation in the environment, especially in the root zone, induces irreversible changes in various horticultural and agricultural species. Plants exposed to fluoride compounds exhibit alterations in their appearance, metabolism, chemical composition, and physiology. Fluoride phytotoxicity manifests itself in changes in the activity of enzymes, has an adverse effect on the photosynthesis process, and leads to inhibition of plant growth and biomass gain. However, the recent literature provides little information about fluoride concentrations in the medium that constitute toxicity threshold values. The thesis that low amounts of fluoride may have a stimulating effect on some plant parameters requires verification and further research. Nevertheless, the hypothesis of the very thin and not fully understood boundary between the toxic and neutral or stimulating effect of fluoride on plants depending on the plant species seems to be supported.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.J. and K.P.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.J. and K.P. writing—review and editing, Z.J. and K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schmedt auf der Günne, J.; Mangstl, M.; Kraus, F. Occurrence of difluorine F2 in nature—In situ proof and quantification by NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tressaud, A. Fluorine: A Paradoxical Element; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 5, pp. 1–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singh, S.; Singh, J.; Singh, N. Studies on the impact of fluoride toxicity on growth parameters of Raphanus sativus L. Indian J. Sci. Res. 2013, 4, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ullah, R.; Zafar, M.S.; Shahani, N. Potential fluoride toxicity from oral medicaments: A review. Iran. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 2017, 20, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, M.A.; Bibi, H.; Munir, I.; Ahmad, M.N.; Zia, A.; Mustafa, G.; Ullah, I.; Khan, I. Fluoride toxicity and its effect on two varieties of Solanum lycopersicum. Fluoride 2018, 51, 267–277. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dutkiewicz, T. Forms of Human Exposure to Environmental Factors; Karski, J.B., Pawlak, J., Eds.; Environment and Health: Warsaw, Poland, 1995; pp. 107–113. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kurdi, M.S. Chronic fluorosis: The disease and its anaesthetic implications. Indian J. Anaesth. 2016, 60, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ranjan, R.; Ranjan, A. Fluoride Toxicity in Animals; Springer Briefs in Animal Sciences: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Helmenstine, A.M. What Is the Difference between Fluorine and Fluoride? Thought Co. 27 August 2020. Available online: thoughtco.com/fluorine-vs-fluoride-3975953 (accessed on 6 September 2021).
  10. Lacson, C.F.Z.; Lu, M.-H.; Huang, Y.-H. Fluoride-containing water: A global perspective and a pursuit to sustainable water defluoridation management—An overview. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, N.D.; Taylor, M.D.; Drewry, J.J. Anthropogenic fluorine accumulation in the Waikato and Bay of Plenty regions of New Zealand: Comparison of field data with projections. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sharma, R.; Rajinder, K. Fluoride toxicity triggered oxidative stress and the activation of antioxidative defence responses in Spirodela polyrhiza L. Schleiden. J. Plant Interact. 2019, 14, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Bharti, V.K.; Giri, A.; Kumar, K. Fluoride sources, toxicity and its amelioration: A Review. Ann. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. 2017, 2, 021–032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Naik, R.G.; Dodamani, A.; Vishwakarma, P.; Jadhav, H.C.; Khairnar, M.R.; Deshmukh, M.A.; Wadgave, U. Level of fluoride in soil, grain and water in Jalgaon District, Maharashtra, India. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, ZC05–ZC07. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ramteke, L.P.; Sahayam, A.C.; Ghosh, A.; Rambabu, U.; Reddy, M.R.P.; Popat, K.M.; Rebary, B.; Kubavat, D.; Marathe, K.V.; Ghosh, P.K. Study of fluoride content in some commercial phosphate fertilizers. J. Fluor. Chem. 2018, 210, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guth, S.; Hüser, S.; Roth, A.; Degen, G.; Diel, P.; Edlund, K.; Eisenbrand, G.; Engel, K.-H.; Epe, B.; Grune, T.; et al. Toxicity of fluoride: Critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 1375–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dehbandi, R.; Moore, F.; Keshavarzi, B.; Abbasnejad, A. Fluoride hydrogeochemistry and bioavailability in groundwater and soil of an endemic fluorosis belt, central Iran. Environ. Earth. Sci. 2017, 76, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shahab, S.; Mustafa, G.; Khan, I.; Zahid, M.; Yasinzai, M.; Ameer, N.; Asghar, N.; Ullah, I.; Nadhman, A.; Ahmed, A.; et al. Effects of fluoride ion toxicity on animals, plants, and soil health: A review. Fluoride 2017, 50, 393–408. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yeşilnacar, M.İ.; Demir Yetiş, A.; Dülgergil, Ç.; Kumral, M.; Atasoy, A.D. Geomedical assessment of an area having high-fluoride groundwater in southeastern Turkey. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. García, M.G.; Borgnino, L. Fluoride in the context of the environment. In Fluorine: Chemistry, Analysis, Function and Effects; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2015; Volume 3, p. 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peckham, S.; Awofeso, N. Water fluoridation: A critical review of the physiological effects of ingested fluoride as a public health intervention. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 293019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fuge, R. Flourine in the environment, a review of its sources and geochemistry. Appl. Geochem. 2018, 100, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Singh, G.; Kumari, B.; Sinam, G.K.; Kumar, N.; Mallick, S. Fluoride distribution and contamination in the water, soil and plants continuum and its remedial technologies, an Indian perspective—A review. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 239, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hong, B.D.; Joo, R.N.; Lee, K.S.; Lee, D.S.; Rhie, J.H.; Min, S.W.; Song, S.G.; Chung, D.Y. Fluoride in soil and plant. Korean J. Agr. Sci. 2016, 43, 522–536. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bombik, E.; Bombik, A.; Rymuza, K. The influence of environmental pollution with fluorine compounds on the level of fluoride in soil, feed and eggs of laying hens in Central Pomerania, Poland. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Xiajin, W.; Finbin, X.; Aoshan, Y. Processes occurring in the soil and fluorine. World News Nat. Sci. 2017, 8, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  27. Edmunds, W.M.; Smedley, P.L. Fluoride in natural waters. In Essentials of Medical Geology, 2nd ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 311, p. 336. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bibi, S.; Farooqi, A.; Yasmin, A.; Kamran, M.A.; Niazi, N.K. Arsenic and fluoride removal by Potato Peel and Rice Husk (PPRH) ash in aqueous environments. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2017, 19, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Smolik, B.; Telesiński, A.; Szymczak, J.; Zakrzewska, H. Assessing of humus usefulness in limiting of soluble fluoride content in soil. Ochr. Środ. Zas. Nat. 2011, 49, 202–208. [Google Scholar]
  30. Katiyar, P.; Pandey, N.; Kant Sahu, K. Biological approaches of fluoride remediation: Potential for environmental clean-up. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 13044–13055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shanker, S.A.; Srinivasulu, D.; Kumar Pindi, K. A study on bioremediation of fluoride-contaminated water via a novel bacterium Acinetobacter sp. (GU566361) isolated from potable water. Res. Chem. 2020, 2, 100070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Banerjee, A.; Singh, A.; Sudarshan, M.; Roychoudhury, A. Silicon nanoparticle-pulsing mitigates fluoride stress in rice by fine-tuning the ionomic and metabolomic balance and refining agronomic traits. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 127826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ghassemi-Golezani, K.; Farhangi-Abriz, S. Biochar alleviates fluoride toxicity and oxidative stress in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) seedlings. Chemosphere 2019, 223, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Moon, D.H.; Jo, R.; Koutsospyros, A.; Cheong, K.; Park, J.-H. Soil washing of fluorine contaminated soil using various washing solutions. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 94, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Pelc, J.; Smolik, B.; Krupa-Małkiewicz, M. Effect of sodium fluoride on some morphological and physiological parameters of 10-day-old seedlings of various plant species. Folia Pomeranae Univ. Technol. Stetin. Agric. Aliment. Piscaria Zootech. 2017, 338, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Panda, D. Fluoride toxicity stress: Physiological and biochemical consequences on plants. Int. J. Bioresour. Environ. Agric. Sci. 2015, 1, 170–184. [Google Scholar]
  37. Baunthiyal, M.; Ranghar, S. Accumulation of F by plants: Potential for phytoremediation. Clean Soil Air Water 2013, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, K.; Giri, A.; Vivek, P.; Kalaiyarasan, T.; Kumar, B. Effects of fluoride on respiration and photosynthesis in plants: An overview. Ann. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. 2017, 2, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ruan, J.; Ma, J.; Shi, Y.; Han, W. The impact of pH and calcium on the uptake of fluoride by tea plants (Camellia sinensis L.). Ann. Botany. 2004, 93, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Das, C.; Uttiya, D.; Deep, C.; Kumar, D.J.; Kumar, M.N. Fluoride toxicity effects in potato plant (Solanum tuberosum, L.) grown in contaminated soils. Oct. J. Environ. Res. 2015, 3, 136–143. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gramowska, H.; Siepak, J. The effect of the fluorine level on the state of leaves and needles of trees in Poznań city and its vicinities. Roczn. Ochr. Srod. 2002, 4, 445–447. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gautam, R.; Bhsrdway, N.; Saini, Y. Fluoride accumulation by vegetables and crops grown in Nawa Tehsil of Nagaur Ditrict (Rajasthan, India). J. Phytol. 2010, 2, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kłódka, D.; Musik, D.; Wójcik, K.; Telesiński, A. Fluorine content in selected vegetables grown within the area affected by emission of that element from the “POLICE”. Bromat. Chem. Toksykol. 2008, XLI, 964–969. [Google Scholar]
  44. Agarwal, R.; Chauhan, S.S. Bioaccumulation of sodium fluoride toxicity in plant parts at different phases and its impact on crop Hordeum vulgare (Barley) variety RD 2052. Int J. Multidiscp. Res. Dev. 2015, 2, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  45. Maleki, A.; Daraei, H.; Mohammadi, E.; Zandi, S.; Teymouri, P.; Mahvi, A.H.; Gharibi, F. Daily fluoride intake from Iranian Green Tea: Evaluation of various flavorings on fluoride release. Environ. Health Insights 2016, 28, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Vakdevi, V.; Gopalan, V.; Arjun, L.K. Comparison of fluoride levels (Total and Extracted) in young, old tea leaves and market tea samples along with impact of tea infusion on dental fluorosis in fluoride endemic villages of Nalgonda District, India. Adv. Dent. Oral Health 2019, 10, 555793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, X.C.; Gao, H.J.; Wu, H.H.; Yang, T.Y.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Mao, J.D.; Wan, X.C. Ca2+ and CaM are involved in Al3+ pretreatment-promoted fluoride accumulation in tea plants (Camellia sinesis L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 96, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ponikvar-Svet, M. Exposure of humans to fluorine and its assessment. Fluor. Health 2008, 12, 487–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Koblar, A.; Tavčar, G.; Ponikvar-Svet, M. Fluoride in teas of different types and forms and the exposure of humans to fluoride with tea and diet. Food Chem. 2012, 2, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Esfehani, M.; Ghasemzadeh, S.; Mirzadeh, M. Comparison of fluoride ion concentration in black, green and white tea. Int. J. Ayurvedic Med. 2018, 9, 263–265. [Google Scholar]
  51. Mochammad, Y. Determination of fluoride in black, green and herbal teas by ion-selective electrode using a standard-addition method. Dent. J. (Maj. Ked. Gigi) 2005, 38, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khandare, A.L.; Shanker Rao, G. Uptake of fluoride, aluminum and molybdenum by some vegetables from irrigation water. J. Hum. Ecol. 2006, 19, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Senkondo, Y.H.; Mkumbo, S.; Sospeter, P. Fluorine and copper accumulation in lettuce grown on fluoride and copper contaminated soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2018, 49, 2638–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bachanek, T.; Hendzel, B.; Wolańska, E.; Samborski, D.; Jarosz, Z.; Pitura, K.M.; Dzida, K.; Podymniak, M.; Borowicz, B.T.; Niewczas, A.; et al. Condition of mineralized tooth tissue in a population of 15-year-old adolescents living in a region of Ukraine with slightly exceeded fluorine concentration in the water. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2019, 26, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kusa, Z.; Wardas, W.; Sochacka, J.; Pawłowska-Góral, K. Fluoride accumulation in selected vegetables during their vegetation. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2004, 13, 55–58. [Google Scholar]
  56. Yadav, R.K.; Sharma, S.; Bansal, M.; Singh, A.; Panday, V.; Maheshwari, R. Effects of fluoride accumulation on growth of vegetables and crops in Dausa District, Rajasthan, India. Adv. Biores. 2012, 3, 14–16. [Google Scholar]
  57. Emekli-Alturfan Yarat, A.; Akyzus, S. Fluoride levels in various black tea, herbal and fruit infusions consumer in Turkey. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 1495–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Telesiński, A.; Grzeszczuk, M.; Jadczak, D.; Zakrzewska, H. Fluoride content and biological value of flowers of some chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.) cultivars. J. Elem. 2013, 17, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Caudhary, A.; Goutham, B.S.; Navpreet, K.; Gupta, R. Estimation of fluoride concentration of various citrus and non-citrus fruits commonly consumed and commercially available in Mathura city. J. Indian Assoc. Public Health Dent. 2013, 11, 9. [Google Scholar]
  60. Jaudenes, J.R.; Gutiérrez, Á.J.; Paz, S.; Rubio, C.; Hardisson, A. Fluoride risk assessment from consumption of different foods commercialized in a European region. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zohoori, F.V.; Maguire, A. Development of a database of the fluoride content of selected drinks and foods in the UK. Caries Res. 2016, 50, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Balestrasse, C.B.; Lavado, K.R. Effects of high arsenic and fluoride soil concentrations on soybean plants. Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 84, 407–416. [Google Scholar]
  63. Telesiński, A.; Śnioszek, M. Bioindicators of environmental pollution with fluorine. Bromat. Chem. Toksykol. 2009, 4, 1148–1154. [Google Scholar]
  64. Choudhary, S.; Rani, M.; Singh, R.; Prasad, S.; Patra, A.; Ogireddy, S.D. Impact of fluoride on agriculture: A review on it’ s sources, toxicity in plants and mitigation strategies. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2019, 7, 1675–1680. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sharma, R.; Kaur, R. Insights into fluoride-induced oxidative stress and antioxidant defences in plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Foranasiero, R.B. Phytotoxic effects of fluorides. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 979–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cai, H.; Dong, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, D.; Peng, C.; Zhang, Z.; Wan, X. Physiological and cellular responses to fluoride stress in tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves. Acta Physiol. Plant 2016, 38, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ram, A.; Verma, P.; Gadi, B.R. Effect of fluoride and salicylic acid on seedling growth and biochemical parameters of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Fluoride 2014, 47, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chakrabarti, S.; Patra, P.K. Biochemical and antioxidant responses of paddy (Oryza sativa L.) to fluoride stress. Fluoride 2015, 48, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  70. Rodrigues, D.A.; Sales, J.D.F.; Filho, S.C.V.; Rodrigues, A.A.; Teles, E.M.G.; Costa, A.C.; Reis, E.L.; Silva, T.A.D.C.; Müller, C. Bioindicator potential of Ricinus communis to simulated rainfall containing potassium fluoride. PeerJ 2020, 1, e9445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Karolewski, P.; Siepak, J.; Gramowska, H. Response of Scots pine, Norway spruce and Douglas fir needles to environment pollution with fluorine compounds. Dendrobiology 2000, 45, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  72. Gao, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, S.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, R. Effect of fluoride on photosynthetic pigment content and antioxidant system of Hydrilla verticillata. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2018, 20, 1257–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Pal, K.C.; Mondal, N.K.; Bhaumik, R.; Banerjee, A.; Datta, J.K. Incorporation of fluoride in vegetation and associated biochemical changes due to fluoride contamination in water and soil: A comparative field study. Ann. Environ. Sci. 2012, 6, 123–139. [Google Scholar]
  74. Landis, W.G.; Sofield, R.M.; Yu, M. Introduction to Environmental Toxicology, Molecular Substructures to Ecological Landscapes, 4th ed.; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; pp. 255–268. [Google Scholar]
  75. Pant, S.; Pant, P.; Bhiravamurthy, P. Effects of fluoride on early root and shoot growth of typical crop plants of India. Fluoride 2008, 41, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  76. Mondal, N.K. Effect of fluoride on photosynthesis, growth and accumulation of four widely cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in India. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sachan, P.; Lal, N. Effect of sodium fluoride on germination, seedling growth and photosynthetic pigments in Cicer arietinum L. and Hordeum vulgare L. MOJ Eco Environ. Sci. 2018, 3, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Szostek, R.; Ciećko, Z. Effect of soil contamination with fluorine on the content of phosphorus in biomass of crops. J. Elem. 2015, 20, 731–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fung, K.F.; Wong, M.H. Effects of soil pH on the uptake of Al, F and other elements by tea plants. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2002, 82, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nagaraju, A.; Thejaswi, A.; Aitkenhead-Peterson, J.A. Fluoride and heavy metal accumulation by vegetation in the fluoride affected area of Talupula, Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh. J. Geol. Soc. India 2017, 89, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jha, S.K.; Nayak, A.K.; Sharma, Y.K. Fluoride toxicity effects in onion (Allium cepa L.) grown in contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2009, 76, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Boukhris, A.; Laffont-Schwob, I.; Folzer, H.; Rabier, J.; Mezghani, I. Tolerance strategies of two Mediterranean native xerophytes under fluoride pollution in Tunisia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 34753–34764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sustainability 13 12065 g001 550
Figure 1. Removing fluoride from the environment [30].
Figure 1. Removing fluoride from the environment [30].
Sustainability 13 12065 g001
Sustainability 13 12065 g002 550
Figure 2. Fluorine bioremediation methods [30,31].
Figure 2. Fluorine bioremediation methods [30,31].
Sustainability 13 12065 g002
Table
Table 1. Fluoride concentration in all three types of tea (in mg/L) average time of brewing 5 and 15 min [50].
Table 1. Fluoride concentration in all three types of tea (in mg/L) average time of brewing 5 and 15 min [50].
Kind of Teamg F/L
White1.37
Black1.84
Green0.23
Table
Table 2. Fluoride content in selected species of vegetables and fruits.
Table 2. Fluoride content in selected species of vegetables and fruits.
GrupSpeciesConcentration (mg·kg)
vegetablesonion0.01 [60]
lettuce0.08 [60]; 0.05 [61]
potato0.99 [60]
tomatoe0.96 [60]; 0.01 [61]
carrots0.04 [60]
celery0.01 [60]
cucumber0.01 [60]
fruitsbananas1.72 [60]
plums<0.005 [61]
berries0.008 [60]
kiwi0.010 [60]
oranges0.023 [61]
grapes0.028 [61]
cherries0.010 [61]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jarosz, Z.; Pitura, K. Fluoride Toxicity Limit—Can the Element Exert a Positive Effect on Plants? Sustainability 2021, 13, 12065. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112065

AMA Style

Jarosz Z, Pitura K. Fluoride Toxicity Limit—Can the Element Exert a Positive Effect on Plants? Sustainability. 2021; 13(21):12065. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jarosz, Zbigniew, and Karolina Pitura. 2021. "Fluoride Toxicity Limit—Can the Element Exert a Positive Effect on Plants?" Sustainability 13, no. 21: 12065. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop