Next Article in Journal
Global Challenges of Digital Transformation of Markets: Collaboration and Digital Assets
Next Article in Special Issue
An Overview of Sandbox Experiment on Ground Heat Exchangers
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Literature Review of Inclusive Climate Change Adaption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design Optimization and Comparative Analysis of 100% Renewable Energy Systems for Residential Communities in Typical Areas of China When Considering Environmental and Economic Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Effect and Mechanism of Alkali–Silica Reaction Expansion in Glass Concrete

1
Guangxi Key Laboratory of New Energy and Building Energy Saving, Guilin 541004, China
2
College of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
3
School of Chemical Science and Technology, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10618; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910618
Submission received: 11 June 2021 / Revised: 5 September 2021 / Accepted: 13 September 2021 / Published: 24 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Utilization of Solar Energy in Smart Buildings)

Abstract

:
The suppression of ASR expansion hazards of glass concrete has always been a key and hot issue in the research of glass concrete. According to the ASTM C1260-14 fast mortar rod method, glass sand and glass powder act as fine aggregate and auxiliary cementing material, respectively. The changes in expansion rate with different amounts of glass sand content and different particle sizes of glass powder in mortar rods were compared, and the effects of glass sand content and the glass powder particle size on the expansion of ASR were analyzed. SEM was used to compare and analyze the microstructure of mortar rods to explore the mechanism of ASR expansion of glass concrete, and the results showed that the addition of glass powder had a certain inhibitory effect on ASR expansion. The larger the particle size of glass powder was, the better the inhibition effect on ASR expansion and the longer its duration. Compared with the three groups of experiments of 0–13 μm, 13–38 μm, and 38–75 μm, it was found that the influence of the glass powder particle size on the expansion of ASR was weaker than that of dosage. The inhibitory effect of glass powder on ASR expansion is related to the fact that glass powder is more involved in pozzolanic reaction in the early hydration process.

1. Introduction

With the continuous development of industrialization and urbanization in various countries, glass is widely used in various fields of production and life but is followed by a sharp increase in waste glass. The production of waste glass in the world has been increasing at an astonishing rate nowadays, becoming an important source of environmental pollution. However, using waste glass in building materials is a more effective way of making use of waste glass, which can reduce solid waste and save building material resources.
At present, the research on waste glass concrete, on both national and international levels, is mainly divided into the following parts: In the first group of studies, the ground glass is used as concrete fine aggregate [1,2,3,4,5], while in the second, it is used as inert filling material in concrete [6,7]; the third theme of research is to produce cement as cement clinker, and in the fourth, cement is partially replaced as an auxiliary cementitious material [8,9,10]. It is found that when waste glass is used as aggregate, the mechanical properties of concrete are reduced, mainly due to the existence of a weak interface [11,12]. In addition, an alkali–aggregate reaction will occur when the aggregate particles are larger (mainly refers to the particle size larger than 1.2~1.5 mm), which leads to the expansion failure of concrete by water absorption [11,12]. This phenomenon does not occur when the glass is ground into powder, but the potentially high alkali content caused by it must be noted. Glass has a pozzolanic activity after being ground into powder, which is also a much debated problem among researchers [13,14,15].
At first, a large number of researchers mainly devoted themselves to the study of waste glass in concrete aggregate for a long time [3,4,5]. Due to the alkali in cement and a large amount of active silica in glass, which leads to considerable alkali–aggregate reaction and expansion damage of concrete [10] and thus has made the research stagnant. Although researchers have proposed several methods to reduce ASR expansion, such as replacing the original cement with pozzolanic cement, adding fiber materials to waste glass concrete, adding lithium compounds, etc. [16], the outcomeis still not satisfactory. Some researchers also used glass as the raw material for the production of cement. However, the experiments showed that the increase in alkali content in cement after the addition of glass addition easily causesan alkali–aggregate reaction, which is not beneficial to the performance of concrete [17]. Mohajerani et al. proved that when the glass powder is ground to a certain extent, it does not cause ASR, and it also has pozzolanic activity, which can improve the performance of concrete [16]. Researchers found that when the particle size of glass powder is less than 300 μm, it shows significant pozzolanic activity, and the ASR reaction will become very weak [18]. Meyer et al. found that when the cement replacement rate is low and the age is 90 days, the pozzolanic activity of glass powder is higher than that of fly ash when the sizeis less than 100 μm [19]. Jani et al. proved that glass powder has good pozzolanic activity when the particle size is less than 20μm.The activity indices of 7d, 28d, and 90d reach 82%, 95%, and 102% [20], respectively. Schwarz et al. found that when the waste glass powder is added into concrete, the compressive strength of concrete is the best, and the hydration effect is enhanced when the content is 10% [21].
However, an earlier study found [22,23,24] that glass concrete was prone to alkali–silicic acid reaction (ASR), resulting in local expansion and cracking of the concrete, which severelyaffected the safety of concrete structures. This is the most important factor restricting the development and application of waste glass concrete. Therefore, the suppression of the ASR expansion hazards of glass concrete has always been a key and hot issue in glass concrete research. At present, the main measures to inhibit the expansion of glass concrete ASR include the mixing of fly ash, metakaolin, slag, silica fume, and other mineral admixtures [25,26,27,28,29], mixing chemical admixtures such as lithium-containing compounds and aluminum-containing compounds [30,31,32,33,34], controlling the size of glass particles [35,36,37,38], etc. Interestingly, many scholars have shown [39,40,41] that ground glass powder itself is an effective ASR expansion inhibitor. As an auxiliary cementitious material for concrete, glass grinding can stimulate the activity of volcanic ash, helping to improve the mechanical properties and durability of concrete and reduce the ASR hazards of glass concrete.
In this paper, according to ASTM C1260-14 “Standard Test Method for Alkali Potential Reactivity of Aggregate. Cement Stick Method”, the ASTM C1260 rapid mortar bar method was adopted [42]. The glass sand and glass powder prepared by waste glass were used as aggregate and auxiliary cementitious materials, respectively. The river sand and cement were replaced by equal mass, the expansion rate of mortar rods with a different glass sand content and different particle size of glass powder was compared, and the effects of glass sand content and particle size of glass powder on ASR expansion were analyzed. The microstructure of mortar bars was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), to further explore the mechanism of glass sand content and glass powder particle size on ASR expansion of glass concrete. The inhibition mechanism of glass powder on ASR expansion may be due to the potential pozzolanic property of ground glass powder. Glass powder is mixed into concrete as auxiliary cementitious material to provide relevant theoretical support for the recycling and reuse of waste glass in concrete.

2. Experiment

2.1. Raw Materials

The experimental cement is P.O. 42.5 ordinary Portland cement produced by Guilin Conch cement Factory, its specific surface area is 420.9 m2/Kg, density is 3150 kg/m3. The main chemical composition is shown in Table 1. The sand used in the experiment is the Lijiang River sand collected locally in Guilin; its apparent density is 2630 kg/m3. ASTM C1260-01 “Standard Test Method for Alkali Potential Reactivity of Aggregate. Mortar Stick Method” and TB/T 2922.5-2010 “Rapid Mortar Rod Method for Testing Alkaline Reactivity of Aggregate for Railway Concrete” were screened, to obtain the river sand particles with different grain sizes, and then the experimental sand was prepared according to the gradation shown in the specification. The glass was made of brown beer bottles recycled from the local waste station in Guilin. NaOH using alkali with purity ≥ 98% was purchased from Tiantian instrument and equipment Co., Ltd. (Guilin, China).

2.2. Preparation of Glass Powder with Different Particle Sizes

The initial diameter range of glass sand from waste glass products purchased from a waste recycling station was mainly 233–282μm. The specific surface area was 365.7 m2/kg, and the density was 2470 kg/m3. The main chemical components are shown in Table 1. The final particle size of glass powder was 0–13 μm, 13–38 μm, and 38–75 μm by cleaning, crushing, ball milling, screening, and drying. The preparation process is shown in Figure 1. The specific surface area and density of each particle size of glass powder are shown in Table 2.

2.3. Experimental Method

Glass powder and glass sand were used as auxiliary cementing material and aggregate, respectively, to replace cement and river sand with equal mass. According to the mixture ratio shown in Table 3, mortar bar specimens were made, and the specimen size was 25 mm × 25 mm × 280 mm. A total of 12 sets of mortar rod specimens were made in this experiment, with 3 specimens in each group. Among them, JZ0, JZ20, and JZ100 were the control specimens without glass powder and glass sand content (0%, 20%, 100%). The molds of each group were removed after pouring for 24 h. The initial length of the mortar bar was measured at room temperature and then placed in a 1.0 mol/L NaOH curing solution in a constant temperature water bath. The temperature was maintained at 80 °C ± 1. The lengths of mortar rods at 14d were tested. The specimen was taken out of the thermostat, and the length test of the mortar bar was completed within 15 s to reduce the influence of ambient temperature on the test results. The length of each mortar bar at different ages was measured, and the expansion rate of each specimen at different ages was calculated by Equation (1); then, the final expansion rate of each group was obtained. The microstructure and reaction product composition of specimens after curing for 14 d were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the effect and mechanism of ASR expansion of glass concrete were analyzed.
ε t = L t L 0 L 0 2 Δ × 100   %
where εt is the expansion rate of the test piece on day t; Lt is the length of the test piece on day t; L0 is the initial length of the test piece; ∆ is the length of the test probe.

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Analysis of Potential ASR Hazards of Aggregate

The 14-day expansion rate of mortar bars of each group is shown in Figure 2. It can be seen from Figure 1 that when glass sand replaces river sand by 20% and 100%, the 14-day expansion rate of concrete is 0.179% and 0.212%, respectively, which is much larger than the critical value of less than 0.1% required by the code [29]. This shows that there are great safety risks in directly applying waste glass to concrete in the form of glass sand. The necessary ASR suppression treatment must be carried out. Further study found that the expansion rate of concrete mixed with glass powder decreased significantly. For example, the 14-day expansion rate of the sample with a glass powder content of 20% and a particle size of 13–38 μm was only 0.02%, which was much lower than the 0.1% required by the specification, which indicated that the glass powder could effectively restrain the ASR of concrete, reduce the ASR expansion rate, and improve the service performance of concrete. At the same time, when the glass powder content is 20%, and the glass sand content is 100%, the expansion rate of the 14 days concrete is still more than 0.1%. For example, the expansion rate of the sample with a particle size of 13 μm–38 μm is 0.129%. Although the expansion rate of the sample without glass powder (0.212%) has decreased significantly, there is still a risk of ASR expansion during the service of glass concrete. However, the production cost of glass powder is much higher than that of glass sand, so the application of waste glass in concrete should be combined with glass powder and glass sand according to a certain proportion to achieve the purpose of complementary advantages.

3.2. SEM Image Analysis of Glass Concrete

Figure 3 is the SEM image of the specimens with different glass sand content without glass powder during the curing age of 14 days. It can be clearly seen that with the increase of glass sand content, more fluffy and thin-skinned reaction products are generated on the particle surface, and the overall structure is loose and there are many gaps. Based on the appearance characteristics of the reaction product and the energy spectrum analysis of the thin-skinned reaction product in zone A, it is inferred that the reaction product isASR gel. It shows that due to the addition of glass sand, a considerablealkali–silicic acid reaction (ASR) occurred in the composite cementitious material system, resulting in a large amount of ASR gel. These ASR gels will absorb a lot of water and increase their volume, leading to a visible increase in the expansion rate of the sample, shown macroscopically. It is proved that severe ASR occurred in mortar rods without glass powder, and a large number of ASR gels are produced, which will further demonstrate the potential ASR hazard of local river sand in Guilin from the microscopic point of view [24].
Figure 4 shows the SEM images of specimens with 20% glass powder and 13–38 μm glass powder with different glass sand content for 14 days. It can be seen from Figure 4a that after adding glass powder, a large number of fibrous reaction products are formed on the surface of the concrete particles. These reaction products are closely packed and overlap each other to form a dense structure without a characteristic morphology. It can be judged as CSH gel by the power classification. It is inferred that the glass powder with a smaller particle size can stimulate its potential pozzolanic activity. The composite cementitious material is mainly a denser CSH gel formed by a volcanic ash reaction, which leads to a denser concrete structure and smaller voids. The macroscopic characterization is that the expansion rate of the specimen decreases. At the same time, by comparing the SEM images of GP2/GP5/GP8 and the control group JZ0/JZ1/JZ2, it can be found that when the concrete mix ratio is the same, the amount of loose ASR gel generated on the surface of the GP2/GP5/GP8 concrete particles mixed with glass powder is less, compared with JZ0/JZ1/JZ2 without glass powder, and the surface voids are relatively reduced. It is characterized from the microscopic level that the ground glass powder can effectively inhibit the ASR expansion of the mortar rod specimens. Through the comparison, it is not difficult to find that with the increase inthe amount of glass powder, the loose structure and “paper-like” ASR gel gradually decreases, and the microstructure of the mortar rod becomes increasingly denser, indicating that the reaction products are more CSH gel. The inference in the above experiments is further verified, that is, “the increase in glass powder content will enhance the inhibitory effect on ASR expansion” [43].

3.3. Analysis of the Expansion Mechanism of Glass Concrete ASR

When the concrete contains reactive aggregate, both favorable pozzolanic reaction and harmful alkali–silica reaction (ASR) may occur. When a pozzolanic reaction occurs in concrete, dense CSH gel is generated, and the reaction formula is shown in Formula (2). When ASR occurs in concrete, loose ASR gel is generated. The ASR reaction formula is similar to the pozzolan reaction formula, but Na+ and K+ are replaced by Ca2+. The reaction formula is shown in Formula (3). The two reactions coexist and compete with each other.
S i O 2 + C a 2 + + 2 O H n 1 C a O S i O 2 n 2 H 2 O  
S i O 2 + 2 N a + K + + 2 O H N a 2 K 2 S i O 3 H 2 O  
Combined with the change rule of expansion rate and the comparative analysis of the SEM image, the results indicate that when the glass sand with a larger particle size is mixed into the concrete as fine aggregate, due to the large amount of active SiO2 in the glass sand, it reacts with OH, K+, and Na+ in the concrete pore solution, resulting in the formation of loose ASR gel; then, the ASR gels are swelled by absorbing water, which increases the expansion rate of the specimen. When the particle size of ground glass is less than a certain value, the potential hydraulic activity and potential pozzolanic property of the glass powder are stimulated, and when used as auxiliary cementing material, the active ingredients in the glass powder such as SiO2 are more involved in the pozzolanic reaction, consuming a large amount of Ca(OH)2 and forming a large amount of dense CSH gels. On the one hand, because the OH in the solution is consumed in large quantities, the amount of OH participating in the ASR is reduced, thus reducing the amount of ASR gels and inhibiting ASR swelling; on the other hand, the generated CSH gels have a strong ability to fix Na+ [26], which reduces the Na+ concentration of pore solution and further reduces the ASR degree of active aggregate.
Therefore, combined with the results of expansion rate and SEM diagram analysis, it is inferred that the inhibition mechanism of glass powder on ASR expansion may be due to the potential pozzolanic property of ground glass powder. When glass powder is mixed into concrete as an auxiliary cementitious material, SiO2 in glass powder is more involved in the pozzolanic reaction, consuming OH, in solution and reducing ASR rate, thus reducing the formation of ASR gels. It plays a key role in inhibiting the expansion of ASR [7].

4. Conclusions

By studying the inhibition effect of waste glass powder on ASR expansion, comparing the expansion rate of concrete specimens with different amounts and particle sizes of glass powder at different ages, the effects of glass powder content and particle size on the inhibition of ASR expansion were analyzed. The ASR expansion effects of glass concrete and its mechanism were studied. The main results are as follows: (1) the main occurrence when usingglass sand is ASR, which produces fluffy ASR gel, leading to the increase inexpansion rate; the expansion rate of concrete increases with the increase of glass sand content, and the 14-day-old expansion rate of mortar bars mixed with glass sand is larger than the standard limit value; therefore, there is a considerable hidden safety danger when waste glass is directly used in concrete in the form of glass sand; (2) the glass powder produces dense CSH gel by pozzolanic reaction, and the consumption of a large amount of OH, required by ASR, has a good inhibitory effect on the ASR expansion of concrete, and the inhibitory effect becomes more obvious with the increase in the fineness of the glass powder. The optimum content of glass powder in concrete is less than 20%, and the particle size of glass powder is less than 75 μm; (3) glasspowder and glass sand can be used in concrete as auxiliary cementitious material and aggregate, respectively, which is beneficial to the recycling of waste glass, but the content of glass sand should not be more than 20%.

Author Contributions

D.H. and P.S. surveyed the detailed literature, data collection, and assisted in drafting the manuscript. Y.W. and G.L. were in charge of the author designed the research work, interpreted the data, and helped in manuscript preparation. P.G. assisted in literature survey, data collection, and drafting the manuscript. X.C. assisted in the experimental investigation and drafting of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Science Foundation of China (No:51468014) and Guangxi Key Laboratory of New Energy and Building Energy Saving (No:19-J-21-5).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data and materials are available.

References

  1. Ferdous, W.; Manalo, A.; Siddique, R.; Mendis, P.; Zhuge, Y.; Wong, H.S.; Lokuge, W.; Aravinthan, T.; Schubel, P. Recycling of landfill wastes (tyres, plastics and glass) in construction—A review on global waste generation, performance, application and future opportunities. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 173, 105745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dong, W.; Guo, Y.; Sun, Z.; Tao, Z.; Li, W. Development of self-sensing cement-based sensor using recycled fine waste glass aggregates coated with carbon nanotube. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 314, 127968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Silva, R.V.; De Brito, J.; Dhir, R.K. Properties and composition of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste suitable for concrete production. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 65, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nodehi, M.; Taghvaee, V.M. Sustainable concrete for circular economy: A review on use of waste glass. Glass Struct. Eng. 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sangha, C.M.; Alani, A.M.; Walden, P.J. Relative strength of green glass cullet concrete. Mag. Concr. Res. 2004, 56, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Memon, S.A. Phase change materials integrated in building walls: A state of the art review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 31, 870–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shi, C.; Zheng, K. A review on the use of waste glasses in the production of cement and concrete. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 52, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Soroushian, P. Strength and durability of recycled aggregate concrete containing milled glass as partial replacement for cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 29, 368–377. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nodehi, M.; Taghvaee, V.M. Alkali-activated materials and geopolymer: A review of common precursors and activators addressing circular economy. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 2021, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Naganna, S.R.; Ibrahim, H.A.; Yap, S.P.; Tan, C.G.; Mo, K.H.; El-Shafie, A. Insights into the Multifaceted Applications of Architectural Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Review. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 4213–4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Brito, J.; Kurda, R. The past and future of sustainable concrete: A critical review and new strategies on cement-based materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 281, 123558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lu, J.-X.; Shen, P.; Zheng, H.; Zhan, B.; Ali, H.A.; He, P.; Poon, C.S. Synergetic recycling of waste glass and recycled aggregates in cement mortars: Physical, durability and microstructure performance. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 113, 103632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ahmad, W.; Khan, M.; Smarzewski, P. Effect of Short Fiber Reinforcements on Fracture Performance of Cement-Based Materials: A Systematic Review Approach. Materials 2021, 14, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Omoding, N.; Cunningham, L.S.; Lane-Serff, G.F. Effect of using recycled waste glass coarse aggregates on the hydrodynamic abrasion resistance of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 268, 121177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, M.N.N.; Saha, A.K.; Sarker, P.K. Reuse of waste glass as a supplementary binder and aggregate for sustainable cement-based construction materials: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 28, 101052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mohajerani, A.; Vajna, J.; Cheung, T.H.H.; Kurmus, H.; Arulrajah, A.; Horpibulsuk, S. Practical recycling applications of crushed waste glass in construction materials: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 156, 443–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jayakumar, G.; Mathews, M.E.; Kiran, T.; Yadav, B.S.K.; Kanagaraj, B.; Anand, N. Development and strength assessment of sustainable high strength fiber reinforced concrete. Mater. Today Proc. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, H.Y.; Huang, W.L. Durability of self-consolidating concrete using waste LCD glass. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 1008–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Meyer, C.; Baxter, S.; Jin, W. Potential of waste glass for concrete masonary blocks. In Materials for the New Millennium, Proceedings of the 4th Materials Engineering Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 10–14 November 1996; American Society of Civil Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 666–673. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jani, Y.; Hogland, W. Waste glass in the production of cement and concrete–A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1767–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jochem, L.F.; Casagrande, C.A.; Onghero, L.; Venâncio, C.; Gleize, P.J. Effect of partial replacement of the cement by glass waste on cementitious pastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 273, 121704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Omran, A.F.; D.-Morin, E.; Harbec, D.; Tagnit-Hamou, A. Long-term performance of glass-powder concrete in large-scale field applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 135, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xie, G.G.; Kong, Y.N.; Liu, S.H. Research progress on ASR of glass concrete. Adv. Mater. Ind. 2012, 7, 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jin, W.H.; Meyer, C.; Baxter, S. “Glascrete”—Concrete with glass aggregate. ACI Mater. J. 2000, 97, 208–213. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bazant, Z.P.; Zi, G.; Meyer, C. Fracture mechanics of ASR in concretes with waste glass particles of different sizes. Eng. Mech. ASCE 2000, 126, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Taha, B.; Nounu, G. Utilizing waste recycled glass as sand/cement replacement in concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2009, 21, 709–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, G.; Ling, T.-C.; Wong, Y.-L.; Poon, C.-S. Effects of crushed glass cullet sizes, casting methods and pozzolanic materials on ASR of concrete blocks. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 2611–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, F.H.; Zhang, G.B.; Zhou, H.Y.; Li, G. Inhibition Effect of Super Metakaolin and Fly Ash on Alkali-Silica Reaction in Concrete. J. Build. Mater. 2017, 20, 876–880. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhao, Y.; Sun, P.; Chen, P.; Guan, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, R.; Wei, J. Component Modification of Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag with C4AF as Target Mineral and Application. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ming, Y.; Chen, P.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, X.; Sun, P. Experimental Research of Concrete with Steel Slag Powder and Zeolite Powder. J. Renew. Mater. 2020, 8, 1647–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Leemann, A.; Lörtscher, L.; Bernard, L.; LE Saout, G.; Lothenbach, B.; Espinosa-Marzal, R.M. Mitigation of ASR by the use of LiNO3—Characterization of the reaction products. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 59, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tremblay, C.; Bérubé, M.A.; Fournier, B.; Thomas, M.D.; Folliard, K.J. Experimental investigation of the mechanisms by which LiNO3 is effective against ASR. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 583–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, J.; Yu, L.; Deng, M. Effect of LiNO3 on Expansion of Alkali–Silica Reaction in Rock Prisms and Concrete Microbars Prepared by Sandstone. Materials 2019, 12, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Shi, Z.; Ma, B.; Lothenbach, B. Effect of Al on the formation and structure of alkali-silica reaction products. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 140, 106311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, L.R.; Feng, X.X.; Liu, G. Investigation on the suppressing effect of Al3+ on expansion due to alkali—Silica reaction. Concrete 2010, 5, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rajabipour, F.; Maraghechi, H.; Fischer, G. Investigating the alkali-silica reaction of recycled glass aggregates in concrete materials. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2010, 22, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Suwito, A.; Jin, W.H.; Xi, Y.; Meyer, C. A mathematical model for the pessimum size effect of ASR in concrete. Concr. Sci. Eng. 2002, 4, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dyer, T.D.; Dhir, R.K. Chemical Reactions of Glass Cullet Used as Cement Component. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2001, 13, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shi, C.; Wu, Y.; Riefler, C.; Wang, H. Characteristics and pozzolanic reactivity of glass powders. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 987–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zheng, K.R.; Chen, L.; Zhou, J. Pozzolanic Reaction of Soda-lime Glass and Its Influences on Composition of Calcium Silicate Hydrate. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 44, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, S.; Wang, S.; Tang, W.; Hu, N.; Wei, J. Inhibitory Effect of Waste Glass Powder on ASR Expansion Induced by Waste Glass Aggregate. Materials 2015, 8, 6849–6862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ming, Y.; Sun, P.; Chen, P. Experimental research on preparation of high strength concrete with rice husk ash instead of silica fume. E3S Web Conf. EDP Sci. 2021, 233, 01053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shayan, A.; Xu, A. Value-added utilisation of waste glass in concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowcharts for preparation of glass powder with different particle sizes. (a) Cleaning; (b) Preliminary crushing; (c) Jaw crushing; (d) Ball-milledinto powder; (e) Dissolving into water; (f) Screening by Wet sieve method; (g) Drying; (h) Secondary Ball-milled.
Figure 1. Flowcharts for preparation of glass powder with different particle sizes. (a) Cleaning; (b) Preliminary crushing; (c) Jaw crushing; (d) Ball-milledinto powder; (e) Dissolving into water; (f) Screening by Wet sieve method; (g) Drying; (h) Secondary Ball-milled.
Sustainability 13 10618 g001
Figure 2. Histogram of 14-day-old expansion rate of mortar rods in each group.
Figure 2. Histogram of 14-day-old expansion rate of mortar rods in each group.
Sustainability 13 10618 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of 14dspecimens with different amounts of glass sand content, without glass powder, along with the energy spectrum analysis: (a) JZ0 (glass sand content: 0%); (b) JZ1 (glass sand content: 20%); (c) JZ2 (glass sand content: 100%); (d) energy spectrum analysis of area A.
Figure 3. SEM images of 14dspecimens with different amounts of glass sand content, without glass powder, along with the energy spectrum analysis: (a) JZ0 (glass sand content: 0%); (b) JZ1 (glass sand content: 20%); (c) JZ2 (glass sand content: 100%); (d) energy spectrum analysis of area A.
Sustainability 13 10618 g003
Figure 4. SEM image of different glass sand content specimens with 20% content and 13–38 μm glass power particle size (14d): (a) GP2 (glass sand content: 0%); (b) GP5(glass sand content: 20%); (c) GP8(glass sand content: 100%).
Figure 4. SEM image of different glass sand content specimens with 20% content and 13–38 μm glass power particle size (14d): (a) GP2 (glass sand content: 0%); (b) GP5(glass sand content: 20%); (c) GP8(glass sand content: 100%).
Sustainability 13 10618 g004
Table 1. Chemical compositions of cement and glass (wt. %).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of cement and glass (wt. %).
CompositionsSiO2Al2O3CaONa2OK2OFe2O3MgOSO3TiO2Other
Cement20.24.761.90.190.823.02.63.9/1.9
Glass power72.22.557.110.420.642.470.46/0.151.03
Table 2. Blaine surface area and density of glass power with different particle sizes.
Table 2. Blaine surface area and density of glass power with different particle sizes.
Particle Size (μm)Blaine Surface Area (m2/kg)Density (kg/m3)
0–13729.02510
13–38521.82490
38–75441.22480
Table 3. Mix proportion of the sample.
Table 3. Mix proportion of the sample.
NumberGlass Powder Particle Size
/μm
Glasspowdercontent
/wt.%
Glass Sand Content
/wt.%
Cement
/g
Glass
Powder/g
Glass Sand
/g
Sand
/g
Water
/mL
JZ0/0040000900188
GP10~13200320800900188
GP213~38200320800900188
GP338~75200320800900188
JZ20/0204000180720188
GP40~13202032080180720188
GP513~38202032080180720188
GP638~75202032080180720188
JZ100/010040009000188
GP70~1320100320809000188
GP813~3820100320809000188
GP938~7520100320809000188
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, D.; Sun, P.; Gao, P.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X. Study on the Effect and Mechanism of Alkali–Silica Reaction Expansion in Glass Concrete. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910618

AMA Style

Huang D, Sun P, Gao P, Liu G, Wang Y, Chen X. Study on the Effect and Mechanism of Alkali–Silica Reaction Expansion in Glass Concrete. Sustainability. 2021; 13(19):10618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910618

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Da, Pengliang Sun, Pengfei Gao, Guangyan Liu, Yuanhao Wang, and Xuandong Chen. 2021. "Study on the Effect and Mechanism of Alkali–Silica Reaction Expansion in Glass Concrete" Sustainability 13, no. 19: 10618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910618

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop