Next Article in Journal
A Gender-Focused Prism on the Long-Term Impact of Teachers’ Emotional Mistreatment on Resilience: Do Men and Women Differ in Their Quest for Social-Emotional Resources in a Masculine Society?
Next Article in Special Issue
Consumers Purchase Intentions of Green Electric Vehicles: The Influence of Consumers Technological and Environmental Considerations
Previous Article in Journal
Trading Macro-Cycles of Foreign Exchange Markets Using Hybrid Models
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 13
Issue 17
10.3390/su13179825
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Green Attributes in Young Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: A Cross-Country, Cross-Product Comparative Study Using a Discrete Choice Experiment

Sustainability 2021, 13(17), 9825; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179825
by Chi Thao Dinh 1, Takuro Uehara 1,* and Takahiro Tsuge 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(17), 9825; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179825
Submission received: 5 August 2021 / Revised: 26 August 2021 / Accepted: 28 August 2021 / Published: 1 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Consumer Preferences towards Green Consumption)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is well written and it addressed a very relevant topic.

My personal advice is to improve the results readability, sometimes it is difficult to follow. 

Moreover, it should be better argumented the reason why authors analyzed 2 completely different products, with different price, environmental impact, involvement etc.

 

Good luck with your research 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The article approaches a very relevant topic - we do need to know more about green product attributes and their implications in consumer behavior. Also, the method adopted is quite relevant, and the results are interesting for both academics and practitioners.

Still, in order to be more impactful, the article needs two major improvements.

  1. The literature review section is missing. The Authors introduce the topic in the introduction, and discuss results in detail citing a high number of references. Still, I believe it would be particularly helpful for readers and to build the article arguments to include a good literature review between the introduction and the method sections.
  2. The article includes three research questions, which are merely listed, and not supported by any literature. Eventually there are research hypotheses subjacent to the analysis - if that is the case, those hypotheses might be added to the manuscript too. Anyway, any hypotheses or questions should have a paragraph summarizing the main contributions in the literature that support them. 

 

Although this is major revision (particularly by including a literature review section), I do feel that it won't be difficult for the authors, as the reflection on the extant literature is partly in other sections. 

I wish the authors all the best.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for your effort in complying with the recommendations. 

In my opinion the literature review should be section 2, and could also be longer/stronger. But clearly the article is better, so your revision was a nice improvement to the previous version.

Best of luck to you and your research!

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop