Next Article in Journal
Cooperatives in the Wine Industry: Sustainable Management Practices and Digitalisation
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Natural Aggregate Crushing Process on Crushing Strength Index
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Learning Attitudes and COVID-19 Risk Perception on Poor Academic Performance among Middle School Students
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Modeling of Mine Hoist Disc Brake Temperature for Safer Operation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Pro-Environmental Method of Sample Size Determination to Predict the Quality Level of Products Considering Current Customers’ Expectations

Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5542; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105542
by Dominika Siwiec and Andrzej Pacana *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5542; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105542
Submission received: 25 April 2021 / Revised: 13 May 2021 / Accepted: 14 May 2021 / Published: 16 May 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dears authors,

Congratulations for the work that you have presented. It has important management implications improvement quality attributes through customers’ expectations.

Some suggestions:

In Introduction you may include a clear concept of product quality, satisfactions  and expectations of costumers. You said that they exist and the relations but don´t explain what it is.

In Discussion and / or Conclusion you must be more specific about the number of simple size.

Best regards,

Author Response

We would like to thank the Reviewers for the favourable reception of our article. We are pleased with this assessment. All comments were very important to improve our article. Therefore, we have tried to include and introduce them. We have marked all changes using “Track Changes” function.

 Reviewer 1

1# Congratulations for the work that you have presented. It has important management implications improvement quality attributes through customers’ expectations.

Answer: Thank you very much for your feedback and appreciation of our work. We are pleased for your kind comments.

2# In Introduction you may include a clear concept of product quality, satisfactions  and expectations of costumers. You said that they exist and the relations but don´t explain what it is.

Answer: Thank you for your remark. We have included in Introduction a clear concept of product quality, satisfaction and expectations of customers.

Line: 34-39

3# In Discussion and / or Conclusion you must be more specific about the number of simple size.

Answer: Thank you for your suggestion. We have added in Conclusion the information about the results of sample size.

Line: 726-727

Reviewer 2 Report

A well-written paper with a quite interesting topic. The hypotheses are properly developed although they could be less wordy. The method is appropriate for the topic chosen; I would appreciate more justification why the method is the ideal for the topic under investigation. I would also appreciate the authors to present more clearly the business implications of their paper. Please proceed it.

Author Response

We would like to thank the Reviewers for the favourable reception of our article. We are pleased with this assessment. All comments were very important to improve our article. Therefore, we have tried to include and introduce them. We have marked all changes using “Track Changes” function.

 Reviewer 2

1# A well-written paper with a quite interesting topic. The hypotheses are properly developed although they could be less wordy. The method is appropriate for the topic chosen;

Answer: Thank you very much for your feedback and appreciation of our work. We are pleased for your kind comments.

 

2# I would appreciate more justification why the method is the ideal for the topic under investigation.

Answer: Thank you for your kind remark. We have added more justification why this method is ideal for the topic under investigation.

Line: 114-117

2# I would also appreciate the authors to present more clearly the business implications of their paper. Please proceed it.

Answer: Thank you for your suggestion. We have tried to present more clearly the business implications of our paper.

Line: 696-700

Back to TopTop