Next Article in Journal
The Relationships between Children’s Ego Function and Fear of Negative Evaluation Affecting Academic Failure Tolerance in Early School Age: Analysis by Grade Level Considering Sustainability of Academic Motivation
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Alternative Estimation Procedures of the Implied Equity Duration in a Small Stock Market
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimizing the Raw Material Supply Chain of the Wood Biomass Power Generation Industry for Different Stakeholders’ Benefits: An Analysis of Inner Mongolia, China

1
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(5), 1887; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051887
Submission received: 26 January 2020 / Revised: 27 February 2020 / Accepted: 27 February 2020 / Published: 2 March 2020

Abstract

:
A large number of sand shrubs have been planted in western China, especially in Inner Mongolia. Sand shrubs produce a large amount of stump residue, and wood biomass power generation enterprises that use stump residue as raw materials have emerged in Wushen Banner and other areas. In this paper, the Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model is used to optimize the raw material supply chain of forest biomass power generation enterprises. Optimizations with different objectives represent the choices of different stakeholders. The optimization results are listed as follows. (1) The self-issuance behavior of enterprises is inconsistent with the enterprise behavior required by social planners; (2) When social planners only pay attention to environmental benefits, the utilization rate of raw materials in towns located far from a power plant will be greatly reduced, which is not conducive for the reuse of stump residue; (3) When social planners consider economic, environmental, and social benefits simultaneously, the utilization rate of raw materials in each town will be significantly improved, resources will be effectively utilized, and certain economic benefits will be realized; (4) It is possible to reduce the difficulty of achieving optimization goals by promoting industrial development and encouraging technological progress.

1. Introduction

Western China is one of the most important poverty-stricken areas in China, and faces many challenges including serious desertification, water shortage, and lagging social and economic development [1]. Many kinds of sand shrubs have been planted in the western area by the government to solve the desertification problem, including Caragana korshinskii, Hippophae rhamnoides, and Tamarix chinensis, among others [2]. As of 2010, the protected forests in the desert areas of the western region accounted for 49.73% of the total shrub area in China, of which the sand shrubs in Inner Mongolia accounted for 13.10% [3]. Due to the growth characteristics of shrub species, they must be regularly stumped, which refers to cutting all the branches above the root and neck of the shrubs to enhance the budding ability; stumping allows shrubs to grow thick and straight branches to improve their quality [4]. The sand shrubs in Inner Mongolia produce a large amount of stump residues. Correspondingly, there has arisen a wood biomass energy industry that uses these materials to generate electricity, and has brought economic, environmental, and social benefits to the area [5].
At present, the development of the wood biomass power generation industry remains imperfect due to the immaturity of the raw material supply chain [6]. Many studies have been conducted on the optimization of this supply chain. These studies can be classified according to different optimization targets. Some studies have focused on the optimization of the economic benefits of the raw material supply chain. Because economic benefits can be represented by the cost of the raw material supply chain [7,8,9], these optimization strategies primarily focus on supply chain costs. Specifically, Sara et al. (2004) analyzed the raw material procurement costs, storage costs, storage losses, transportation costs, and other aspects to determine how to reduce the supply chain cost of the raw materials for forest biomass power generation [10]. Higgins and Postma (2004) investigated how to reduce the raw material supply cost by optimizing the utilization of transportation tools [11]. Gronalt et al. (2007) studied how to optimize transportation costs to reduce the supply cost by redesigning the raw material supply chain across the region [12]. Other studies have focused on the optimization of the environmental benefits of the raw material supply chain. Because environmental benefits can be represented by the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of the raw material supply chain [13,14,15], these optimization strategies primarily focus on CO2 emissions. Specifically, Oberscheidert et al. (2013) minimized the CO2 emissions of the entire industrial chain by establishing and optimizing a multiwarehouse transportation route model [16]. Klein et al. (2016) used the life-cycle method to analyze the impacts of different raw material tree species on CO2 emissions in the supply chain of the wood biomass energy industry, and then investigated the optimization of the raw material tree structure to optimize the CO2 emissions of the entire supply chain [17]. There are also some studies that have considered both economic and environmental benefits, and have thus sought to optimize multiple objectives. For example, Cambero and Sowlati (2016) established a mixed-integer programming model with multiperiod economic and environmental dual-objective optimization, and the augmented ε algorithm was used to solve the Pareto optimal solution under dual targets [18].
With the development of the wood biomass power generation industry, the number of jobs absorbed by the raw material supply chain has gradually increased; correspondingly, research on the optimization of the number of jobs absorbed by the raw material supply chain has emerged. Because the social benefits of the wood biomass power generation industry are commonly expressed by the jobs that the industry can absorb [18], related studies on the optimization of the social benefits of the raw material supply chain have been carried out [9,19,20]. Specifically, Cambero and Sowlati (2014) conducted a literature review of the methods of optimizing the raw material chain of the wood biomass industry [6,21]. Shabani and Sowlati (2013) constructed a theoretical model that uses a Mixed integer Linear Programming (MILP) model to study how to optimize the amount of jobs that can be absorbed by the raw material supply chain of the wood biomass industry [6]. Recently, Sowlati (2013) used this model to quantitatively analyze the raw material supply chain in British Columbia, Canada [18]. As is evident from the preceding literature review, the investigation of the optimization of the amount of jobs that the raw material supply chain can absorb is a relatively new research area.
Existing research on the supply chain of raw materials for wood biomass power generation is generally based on industrial development. In addition to single-target optimization based on industrial development, this study also considers the state of the raw material supply chain as selected by social planners with different policy objectives, and the effects of these different policy objectives on the use of stump residue are compared. Specifically, this work uses the economic cost of the supply chain to represent economic benefits, CO2 emissions from the supply chain to represent environmental benefits, and the hours of employment absorbed by the supply chain to represent social benefits. A MILP model is then constructed, and an empirical study using data from the Mu Us Thermal Power Plant in Wushen Banner, Inner Mongolia and a method called the “augmented ε algorithm” are executed. This study attempts to answer the following questions: How can the supply chain of the wood biomass power generation industry that uses sand shrubs as raw materials be optimized? What impacts do different supply chain states have on the use of stump residue? How does the government choose between different policy objectives? This article provides a certain reference for the layout of the supply chain of biomass power generation enterprises, and also provides guidance for government policy choices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Model Assumptions

For the model construction to be more concise and closer to reality, the relevant theories and field investigations were combined to put forward the following assumptions.
(1)
The model is static, and none of the parameters change over time.
(2)
The raw material supply chain of the wood biomass power generation industry can be divided into four links: harvest, yarding, storage, and processing. Any two adjacent links are connected by transportation. The total numbers of green job hours, CO2 emissions, and economic costs are the total numbers of each respective link.
(3)
Because the labor intensiveness of each link of the raw material supply is similar, the health and age of the labor force are not considered in the model presented in this paper. The green job hours are the product of the job fraction and the quantity of raw material supply.
(4)
The demands for the remaining residue of sand shrubs by two entities, the acquisition station and the power plant, are known. The power plant only accepts raw materials provided by the local farmers or purchase stations of Wushen Banner, and does not accept raw materials supplied by other places. Additionally, the raw material supply site only supplies raw materials to the local township acquisition stations, and there is no cross-regional supply of raw materials.
(5)
It is assumed that the sizes of the alternative acquisition stations are the same and are homogenized.
(6)
Only maximizing the green job potential, minimizing the economic costs, and minimizing the CO2 emissions are considered for the site selection of the acquisition station. The constraints of topography and other factors are not considered.
(7)
There are no quantitative restrictions on the tools and equipment used for harvesting, processing, and transportation, and the efficiency of use has no effect on green job hours, economic costs, or CO2 emissions.
(8)
The daily wages of labor in different supply links are consistent.
(9)
The wood biomass in the area is not sliced in the woodland, and is only sliced at the acquisition station or power plant.
(10)
Because the jobs after optimization achieve both economic and environmental benefits that satisfy the concept of “green jobs” proposed by the United Nations Environment Programme in 2008, the term “green job” is adopted in this study to refer to the employment absorbed by the raw material supply chain. In general, the opportunities of green jobs can be expressed by the number of hours of the jobs. Considering the seasonal dispersion of the wood biomass supply itself, as well as the unity of the measure, the number of hours of green jobs is used as a measurement of the opportunities of green jobs offered by the raw material supply chain.

2.2. Symbol Description

In the construction process of a MILP model, it is necessary to model the objective function and the actual constraints. The model primarily includes the variables listed in Table 1.

2.3. Theoretical Model

2.3.1. Objective Functions

The function of total green job hours is:
Total   hour = i I z Z p P b i z p h V i z p + i I z Z c i p h W i p + m z h .
The function of total economic costs is:
Total   cost = i I z Z p P b i z p c V i z p + i I z Z c i p c W i p + m z h Z z .
The function of total CO2 emissions is:
Total   C O 2 = i I z Z p P b i z p e V i z p + i I z Z c i p e W i p + m z h Z z .
Different objective functions can represent the interests of different stakeholders; take minimizing the supply chain costs as an example. Raw material costs are an important component of corporate costs. For wood biomass power generation enterprises, the cost of purchasing raw materials accounts for the highest proportion of the daily operating costs [22]. Via field investigations, it can be found that one of the most important reasons for the competitive inferiority of wood biomass power generation companies in China is the unstable supply of biomass materials. Moreover, from the point of view of the enterprise itself, environmental and sustainability aspects are often not linked to economic success [23]. Based on these factors, optimizing the cost of the raw material supply chain is a top priority for forest biomass power generation enterprises. Therefore, single-objective optimization that minimizes the economic costs of the supply chain can reasonably reflect reality to a certain extent, and is a possible path for enterprises to optimize their behavior.
The social planner will pay more attention to environmental and social benefits than to economic benefits. Under the increasing pressure of environmental protection, social planners must consider environment benefits. Countries with large governments, such as China, may consider environmental benefits to be the only target of their policies when they are under pressure to reduce emissions. Such examples can be found in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, in which a large number of high-polluting and energy-consuming enterprises have been shut down. If a social planner only considers environmental benefits, he or she will prefer the state of the supply chain after the single-objective optimization of the CO2 emissions function. Although governments that focus only on environmental benefits are extremely rare, the comparison of different supply chain states has some interesting implications.
A more rational social planner must simultaneously consider social, environmental, and economic benefits, which means that all three objective functions will be included in the optimization range. Social planners must pay attention to social benefits because higher employment will result in a lower local crime rate, a more stable social environment, and a higher average income. In addition, China is currently pursuing green growth in manufacturing [24]. The government provides a lot of subsidies to the renewable energy industry, so the government may have higher environmental requirements for such enterprises. Social planners must also pay attention to economic benefits because the rapid development of industry will result in higher taxes and many additional benefits to the government.

2.3.2. Constraints

Raw Material Supply Constraints

The sum of the biomass quantity Vizp of the slices transported from the supply site i through the acquisition station z to the power plant p and the unsliced biomass quantity Wip directly transported from the supply site i to the power plant p is less than or equal to the total amount of available biomass resources of the area.
i I z Z p P V i z p + i I p P W i p O 0

Demand Constraints

The sum of the amount of unsliced biomass Wip directly transported from the supply site i to the power plant p and the amount of biomass Vizp transported from the supply site i through the acquisition station z to the power plant p is not less than the demand Q of the power plant.
i I z Z p P V i z p + i I p P W i p Q p
The amount of biomass Vizp from the supply site i through the acquisition station z to the power plant p must not be less than the demand quantity Qz of the acquisition station.
i I z Z p P V i z p Q z

Technological Constraints

The amount of biomass Vizp from the supply site i through the acquisition station z to the power plant p is not greater than the maximum slice capacity Ro of the slicer.
i I z Z p P V i z p R o

Other Constraints

If   i I z Z p P V i z p > 0 ,   then   Z z   =   1 ;
If   i I z Z p P V i z p = 0 ,   then   Z z =   0 ;
V i z p , W i p , Z z 0 ;
V i z p , W i p , Z z 0 .

2.3.3. Optimization Model

The theoretical framework of the optimization model is as follows.
M a x T o t a l   h o u r = T o t a l   h o u r + e p s ( T 1 + T 2 )
s.t.
{ T o t a l   c o s t T 1 = ε 1                                                   ( 13 )   T o t a l   C O 2 T 2 = ε 2                                                   ( 14 ) ( 4 ) ( 11 )
The constraint Equations (13) and (14) are the original objective functions after including ε, and Equations (4)–(11) are the constraints existing in reality, including the raw material supply constraints, demand constraints, technical constraints, and other constraints. The decision variables for the MILP model used in this article are Vizp, Wip, and Zz.

2.4. Augmented ε Constraint Algorithm Method and Model Solution

The methods for solving multi-objective programming mainly include the hierarchical sequence method, analytic hierarchy process, and ε constraint algorithm. An augmented ε constraint algorithm was adopted in the present study to address the MILP problem [25].
The augmented ε constraint algorithm avoids the possibility that the ε algorithm will output a nonoptimal solution [26]. Based on the original ε constraint algorithm, the augmented ε constraint algorithm introduces a dimensionless slack variable. Adding to the original model in a sufficiently small proportion ensures that only nondominated solutions are searched. Different optimization results are solved by continuously adjusting the right-side values of the remaining constraint objective functions until the optimal solution is found. The specific steps are as follows.
(1) Determine the optimal and worst values for the economic costs function and the CO2 emissions function. The optimal value of each function can be solved via single-objective optimization, and the worst value needs to be obtained by the following equations.
The worst value of the economic costs function is as follows:
Total   c o s t 1 m a x = m i n T o t a l c o s t ( x )
s.t.
{ T o t a l h o u r ( x ) = T o t a l h o u r m a x T o t a l c o 2 = T o t a l c o 2 m i n x X
The worst value of the CO2 emissions function is as follows:
Total   c o 2 m a x = m i n T o t a l ( x )
s.t.
{ T o t a l h o u r ( x ) = T o t a l h o u r m a x T o t a l c o s t ( x ) = T o t a l c o s t m i n x X
Finally, the differences between the optimal values and the worst values of the economic cost function and the CO2 emissions function can be respectively calculated, and are defined as R1 and R2.
(2) Let N1 and N2 be the numbers of equal partitions between the economic costs function and the CO2 emissions function, respectively. N1 + 1 and N2 + 1 are the numbers of equal division points, and there are also, respectively, N1 + 1 and N2 + 1 dominant solutions to be explored for each objective function. Let M1 and M2 comprise the index of the equal division point, and it is specified that M1 and M2 are respectively numbered from 1. For each point M1 = 1, ……, N1 (M2 = 1, ……, N2), let its constraint level be ε k = I k + M k * ( R k N k 1 ) .
(3) The optimal solution of the objective function is determined by constantly changing the value of εk.

2.5. Materials

According to field research, the Mu Us Biomass Thermal Power Company in Inner Mongolia was selected as the optimization research object. The company was established in 2006 and was incorporated into the grid for only two years. It began its commercial operation in 2009. The company was the first bio-power plant in China to use sand shrubs as raw materials. According to field research, the company’s operations have greatly boosted local employment. Therefore, this enterprise was used as an empirical case to verify the effectiveness of the MILP model based on the green employment potential optimization of sand shrub resources.
This study mainly used two types of data, namely statistical data and field research data. The statistical data was primarily sourced from the China Forestry Statistical Yearbook 2017 [27], China Energy Statistics Yearbook [28], and China Statistical Yearbook [29]. The field research data primarily includes data on farmers, acquisition stations, and forest biomass power generation enterprises in Wushen Banner, Inner Mongolia. Among them, the data on farmers primarily includes the basic situations of the farmers’ families, the land operations, the sources of the farmers’ income, and the material assets of the farmers. The data on the acquisition stations primarily includes the land operation, the purchase of raw materials, and the processing situation. Finally, the data on the enterprise primarily includes the overall situations of the enterprises, the availability of raw materials for biomass enterprises, the consumption of raw materials, the sales of biomass products, and the tax subsidies for forest biomass energy.

3. Results

The results of the empirical analysis are presented in the following order. The first is the result of the single-objective optimization of the economic cost of the supply chain, which may be the preferred supply chain state of enterprises only concerned with economic benefits. The second is the result of the single-objective optimization of the carbon dioxide emissions of the supply chain, which may be the choice of social planners with stringent emission-reduction mandates. Finally, the result of multi-objective optimization is presented, which may be the preferred supply chain state of more rational social planners.
Table 2 presents the values of the decision variables when economic costs achieved the lowest values with the raw material supply constraints, demand constraints, technological constraints, and other constraints. The lowest values of economic cost are presented in Table 3. Compared with the situation before optimization, the number of acquisition stations in each town decreased significantly. The decline of the acquisition stations was the most pronounced in Sulide Town and Wudinghe Town, and caused the low utilization of resources.
A schematic representation of the supply chain (Figure 1) may help explain the results.
As described in the second assumption, the raw material supply chain of the wood biomass power generation industry can be divided into four links, and any two adjacent links are connected by transportation. According to our field investigation, the transportation from harvest to storage is mostly completed by tractors and other agricultural machinery, which are low-cost transportation methods. The transportation from storage to the power plant is mostly via truck, so the cost is higher. Therefore, this part of the supply chain transport costs constitutes the main component. The number of acquisition stations farther away from power plants fell.

3.1. Single-Objective Optimization under the Target of Maximizing Environmental Benefits

Table 4 presents the values of decision variables when the CO2 emissions achieved the lowest value, and Table 5 presents the lowest values of CO2 emissions. Overall, the optimized results with CO2 emissions as the optimization goal were found to resemble those with economic costs as the optimization goal. However, the number of acquisition stations in Wudinghe Town became zero, which may be because Wudinghe Town is located away from the power plant, thereby increasing the amount of CO2 emitted from the construction of acquisition stations and transportation.
From the comparison of the two supply chain states, it is evident that the supply chain state chosen by the company itself is not optimal for CO2 emissions, and it can be considered that there is a certain conflict between economic and environmental benefits. It is also clear that optimization with the single objective of optimizing environmental benefits will significantly reduce the raw material utilization rate in Sulide Town and Wudinghe Town.

3.2. Multi-Objective Optimization

(1) Relevant parameters.
After linear programming, the optimal value of the economic target was determined to be 680.84 million yuan, and the highest cost was 2031.74 million yuan; the optimal value of the CO2 emissions target was 412.69 million kilograms, and the worst value was 562.70 million kilograms. The augmented ε constraint algorithm was solved five times to solve this problem. The correlation coefficients of the economic costs objective function and the CO2 emissions objective function as the constraints were therefore optimized, as presented in Table 6 and Table 7.
(2) Multi-objective optimization under the target of maximizing economic, environmental, and social benefits.
The optimal value of the green job objective function was solved under the constraints of economic costs and CO2 emissions. The values of the decision variables are presented in Table 8, and the optimal values of green jobs are presented in Table 9. The green job hours were found to be significantly improved, which demonstrates the ability of the model. The number of acquisition stations was found to be 22, which is lower than the actual number of acquisition stations. The optimal green job hours were found to be 399.61 million hours, which is equivalent to 1369 jobs, thus achieving an increase of 380 jobs as compared to reality. Additionally, the optimal supply was found to be 189,200 tons, and the resource utilization rate was greatly improved. Compared with single-objective optimization, the number of acquisition stations in Wudinghe Town was found to be 1. As the establishment of acquisition stations will lead to increases in jobs, costs, and CO2 emissions, it is speculated that the establishment of an acquisition station in Wudinghe Town should be the result of a balance of forces.
In comparison with the first two types of single-objective optimization, the utilization rate of raw materials in Wushenzhao Town and Tuke Town decreased slightly (less than 2%), that in Wulantaole Town was relatively significant (10.24%), that in Gelutu Town remained at no significant change, that in Sulide Town increased slightly (2.6% and 1.16%), and that in Wudinghe Town was greatly improved (38.96% and 42.20%).

3.3. Sensitivity Analysis of Important Parameters

The following four parameters were selected for sensitivity analysis: power plant raw material demand, transportation distance, daily processing capacity of chippers, and unit labor costs. The bases for selection were as follows. (1) Raw material demand: the change in the demand by power plants will directly affect the green job hours, economic costs, and CO2 emissions in the raw material supply chain. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the impact of the changes in demand parameters on green job hours; (2) Transportation distance: transportation links are important links in the wood biomass raw material supply chain. The transportation distance is closely related to the location of the acquisition station, which can affect the employment potential generated by the entire supply chain. Therefore, the transportation distance was selected as the most important parameter for sensitivity analysis; (3) Daily processing capacity of chippers: the amount of raw materials that can be acquired and processed daily by the acquisition station in the processing chain depends largely on this variable; (4) Unit labor price: this variable has a direct impact on economic costs. Additionally, because wages have an impact on the enthusiasm of farmers to participate in the industry, this variable can also affect the number of green jobs to a certain extent.
The impacts of these four parameters on green job hours, economic costs, and CO2 emissions were therefore separately analyzed. The results of sensitivity analysis are displayed in Table 10.
Power plant demand, transportation distance, unit processing volume, and unit labor price were found to have very large impacts on green job hours. When these variables fluctuate within ±10% and ±20%, the demand and unit labor price were found to have the greatest impacts on employment, followed by the transportation distance, and finally the daily processing capacity of chippers.

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to optimize the raw material supply chain of the wood biomass energy industry based on different stakeholder optimizations. A MILP model was constructed, and the augmented ε constraint algorithm and data from Wushen Banner were employed to realize the analytical analysis of this model. Some observations are summarized as follows.
First, it can be found from the comparison between the existing supply chain state and the optimized supply chain state that there is room for optimization in the raw material supply chain of wood biomass power generation.
Whether optimizing economic costs from a corporate perspective, optimizing environmental benefits from a social planner perspective, or taking both social and environmental benefits into account, the raw material supply chain of wood biomass power generation can be optimized. According to the optimization variables, the optimization of the supply chain of forest biomass power generation materials can be started from two aspects. (1) Starting from the MILP model, it is possible to optimize the raw material supply chain of wood biomass power generation by changing the number of acquisition stations; the optimization effect of this method is better. (2) Starting from the sensitivity analysis, changes in the power plant demand, the daily processing capacities of slicers, and the transportation distance have significant impacts on the achievement of the target. Specifically, during the process of sensitivity analysis, it was found that the raw material demand has a small impact on CO2 emissions, and the change in the demand for raw materials will significantly increase the number of hours of green employment without excessively increasing CO2 emissions. Additionally, the transportation distance was found to have little effect on the number of hours of employment, indicating that the reduction in green employment caused by the reduction in the transportation distance is not significant; the economic cost savings from reducing the transportation distance and CO2 emissions are relatively more significant. The increase in the daily processing capacities of chippers and the decline in labor prices will better optimize economic cost targets and employment hours goals, while not excessively increasing CO2 emissions. However, on the one hand, the price of labor is determined by the market; on the other hand, lowering the price of labor may cause damage to workers’ rights and interests. Therefore, efforts to reduce the difficulty of achieving the objective function can be primarily made by changing the other three parameters.
Secondly, it can be found from the comparison of different supply chain states after optimization that the self-issuance behavior of enterprises is inconsistent with the enterprise behavior required by social planners.
Optimization with the objective of minimizing economic costs represents the state of the raw material supply chain that enterprises may choose. In contrast, the single-objective optimization of environmental benefits or the multi-objective optimization of economic, social, and environmental benefits represent the states of the raw material supply chain that a social planner may choose.
Many differences in the states of several supply chains can be determined from the number of acquisition stations, the distributions of acquisition stations in different towns, and the utilization of raw materials. It can be argued that these differences are primarily due to the trade-offs between different goals; for example, setting up an acquisition station is conducive to achieving social goals, but not to achieving environmental or economic goals. When only a single optimization goal of economic or environmental benefits is considered, there will be fewer acquisition stations in the town farther away from the power plant, so the utilization rate of raw materials will be relatively low. When social planners begin to consider social, environmental, and economic benefits, the utilization rate of raw materials in remote towns will be greatly improved, which is conducive to the utilization of sand shrub stump residue.
Compared with existing studies, the present study found that, for the supply chain of raw materials for wood biomass power generation, the efficiency of a supply chain optimized with the single objective of environmental benefits is relatively low. Specifically, considering only environmental benefits may lead to low raw material utilization rates in towns that are located far from a power plant. When optimizing the supply chain via the simultaneous consideration of the economic, environmental, and social benefits, the raw material utilization rate of each town can be significantly improved.
Based on the results of this study, suggestions for enterprises and the government are proposed. It is suggested that enterprises pay more attention to the collection of information on the raw material supply chain and scientifically deploy sites for their own acquisition. From the perspective of the government, the raw material supply chain of the wood biomass power generation industry requires government policy intervention. First, even from the perspective of the single-objective optimization of economic benefits, the existing raw material supply chain has not yet reached its full potential, which may be a result of market failure caused by incomplete corporate information. Secondly, government policy is often implemented from the standpoints of economic and social benefits; however, the results of MILP are far from reality, and therefore, government intervention is required for optimization. Finally, it was found from the sensitivity analysis that the development of the entire industry and technological improvement will effectively reduce the optimization difficulty; thus, the government is advised to encourage and support this industry.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, the optimization model of the raw material supply chain was constructed, and the research objective was realized by conducting two single-objective optimizations and one multi-objective optimization. The conclusions of this study are as follows.
First, the optimization of the wood biomass raw material supply chain can be realized by optimizing the quantity and distribution of raw material acquisition stations. In addition, technological improvements by enterprises, such as increasing the daily processing capacities of chippers, will contribute to the reduction of the difficulty of optimizing the target.
Second, the selection of optimization targets will have a significant impact on the utilization of plain stump residues. This is mainly reflected in the low utilization rate of raw materials in the supply chain that was optimized with environmental benefits as the single objective. The government should make comprehensive considerations when choosing policy objectives, avoid single-issue policy objectives, and choose more balanced and diversified policy objectives.
This paper presents a case study in which data from a power plant in Inner Mongolia was utilized. However, the investigation revealed that there are problems in the supply chain of raw materials for biomass power generation in many regions of China. One of the main directions of future research will probably be the application of the supply chain optimization model on a larger scale, and the exploration of how to improve the supply chain. Another research direction may be the optimization of the model itself, so as to determine the specific location of acquisition sites on a smaller scale and ultimately provide a more detailed reference for enterprise decision-making.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Y.B. and H.Y.; methodology: Y.B.; software: Y.Z.; validation: Y.B., H.Y., and F.M.; formal analysis: Y.Z.; investigation: J.Q.; resources: H.Y.; data curation: M.Z. and J.Q.; writing—original draft preparation: Y.B.; writing—review and editing: Y.B.; visualization: J.Q.; supervision: F.M.; project administration: F.M.; funding acquisition: F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Social Science Fund of China (grant No. 15BGL130).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the researchers of the College of Forestry of Beijing Forestry University for their technical guidance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Z.; Qiu, T.; Chen, B. Multi-phase biofuel supply chain network modeling and multi-objective optimization. CIESC J. 2014, 65, 2802–2812. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yang, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Wu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y. Comparison of population spatial pattern of artemisia oleracea in Mu.us sandy land. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2008, 5, 1901–1910. [Google Scholar]
  3. Report on the Results of the Eighth National Forest Resources Inventory. For. Resour. Manag. 2014, 01, 1–2.
  4. Wei, Y.; Wang, J.; Dang, X.; Wang, R.; Tong, X. Study on the effect of flat stubble on sandy shrub. North. Hortic. 2019, 6, 116–124. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, L.; Zhang, C. Review on the development of forest biomass energy. Inq. Econ. Issues 2012, 10, 186–190. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shabani, N.; Akhtari, S.; Sowlati, T. Value chain optimization of forest biomass for bioenergy production: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 23, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sosa, A.; Acuna, M.; McDonnell, K.; Devlin, G. Managing the moisture content of wood biomass for the optimisation of Ireland’s transport supply strategy to bioenergy markets and competing industries. Energy 2015, 86, 354–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miret, C.; Chazara, P.; Montastruc, L.; Negny, S.; Domenech, S. Design of bioethanol green supply chain: Comparison between first and second generation biomass concerning economic, environmental and social criteria. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2016, 85, 16–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tan, Q.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Miao, X.; Zhu, J. Nonlinear multi-objective optimization model for a biomass direct-fired power generation supply chain using a case study in China. Energy 2017, 139, 1066–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thorsell, S.; Epplin, F.M.; Huhnke, R.L.; Taliaferro, C.M. Economics of a coordinated biorefinery feedstock harvest system: Lignocellulosic biomass harvest cost. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 27, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Higgins, A.J.; Postma, S. Australian sugar mills optimise siding rosters to increase profitability. Ann. Oper. Res. 2004, 128, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gronalt, M.; Rauch, P. Designing a regional forest fuel supply network. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gholamian, E.; Mahmoudi, S.; Zare, V. Proposal, exergy analysis and optimization of a new biomass-based cogeneration system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 93, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Routa, J.; Kellomäki, S.; Kilpeläinen, A.; Peltola, H.; Strandman, H. Effects of forest management on the carbon dioxide emissions of wood energy in integrated production of timber and energy biomass. GCB Bioenergy 2011, 3, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roy, M.M.; Corscadden, K.W. An experimental study of combustion and emissions of biomass briquettes in a domestic wood stove. Appl. Energy 2012, 99, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oberscheider, M.; Zazgornik, J.; Henriksen, C.B.; Gronalt, M.; Hirsch, P. Minimizing driving times and greenhouse gas emissions in timber transport with a near-exact solution approach. Scand. J. For. Res. 2013, 28, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klein, D.; Wolf, C.; Schulz, C.; Weber-Blaschke, G. Environmental impacts of various biomass supply chains for the provision of raw wood in Bavaria, Germany, with focus on climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 539, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cambero, C.; Sowlati, T. Incorporating social benefits in multi-objective optimization of forest-based bioenergy and biofuel supply chains. Appl. Energy 2016, 178, 721–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yue, D.; You, F.; Snyder, S.W. Biomass-to-bioenergy and biofuel supply chain optimization: Overview, key issues and challenges. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2014, 66, 36–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Daugherty, P.J.; Fried, J.S. Jointly optimizing selection of fuel treatments and siting of forest biomass-based energy production facilities for landscape-scale fire hazard reduction. INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 2007, 45, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Cambero, C.; Sowlati, T. Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives—A review of literature. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 36, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, D. Research Progress and Application Prospect of Biomass Energy. Master’s Thesis, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hristov, I.; Chirico, A.; Appolloni, A. Sustainability value creation, survival, and growth of the company: A critical perspective in the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC). Sustainability 2019, 11, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Qu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Appolloni, A.; Li, M.; Liu, Y. Measuring green growth efficiency for Chinese manufacturing industries. Sustainability 2017, 9, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zhang, M. Study on Engineering Application of Mixed Integer Programming Method. Master’s Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bi, X.J.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Li, J.C. An optimal algorithm for constrained biogeography based on dynamic migration. J. Comput. Res. Dev. 2014, 51, 580–589. [Google Scholar]
  27. China Forestry Statistical Yearbook. Available online: http://data.cnki.net/trade/Yearbook/Single/N2019060085?z=Z010 (accessed on 1 December 2019).
  28. China Energy Statistics Yearbook. Available online: http://data.cnki.net/area/Yearbook/Single/N2008070077?z=D20 (accessed on 1 December 2019).
  29. China Statistical Yearbook. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/ (accessed on 1 December 2019).
Figure 1. The schematic representation of the supply chain.
Figure 1. The schematic representation of the supply chain.
Sustainability 12 01887 g001
Table 1. Collection and parameters.
Table 1. Collection and parameters.
SymbolDescription
ICollection by stump remains supply site
ZCollection by alternative acquisition stations
PCollection by wood biomass power plant
b i z p h Hours of green jobs per unit slice from supply point i to power plant p via acquisition station z (hours/ton)
b i z p c Costs per unit slice from supply point i to power plant p via acquisition station z (yuan/ton)
b i z p e CO2 emission per unit slice from supply point i to power plant p via acquisition station z (kg/ton)
c i p h Hours of green jobs per unit slice from supply point i directly to power plant p (hour/ton)
c i p c Costs per unit slice from supply point i directly to power plant p (yuan/ton)
c i p c CO2 emission per unit slice from supply point i directly to power plant p (kg/ton)
m z h Hours of green jobs per unit slice of every alternative acquisition station (hour/ton)
m z c Costs of building alternative acquisition station (yuan)
m z e CO2 emissions of every alternative acquisition station (kg)
VizpBiomass quantity transformed from supply point i to power plant p via acquisition station z (tons)
WipBiomass quantity transformed from supply point i directly to power plant p (tons)
ZzDummy variable; the value is 1 if the acquisition station is established; otherwise, it is 0
OaThe total amount of raw materials from wood biomass energy available in the region; numbers from 1 to 6 respectively represent Wushenzhao Town, Tuke Town, Wulantaole Town, Gelutu Town, Sulide Town, and Wudinghe Town
RoA slicer’s maximum slicing ability
MThe number of the target function (M = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
RkThe difference between the maximum and minimum values of the k-th target function.
NThe equal interval of the k-th target function.
Note: ① The supply of sand shrub trunks refers to that located in Wushen Banner, Inner Mongolia, which mainly includes Wushenzhao Town, Tuke Town, Wulantaole Town, Gelutu Town, Sulide Town, and Wudinghe Town; ② The working hours per unit of green jobs include the harvesting time, gathering time, storage time, slicing time, and transportation time; ③ The cost per unit slice includes harvesting costs, gathering costs, storage costs, slicing costs, and transportation costs; ④ The CO2 emissions include those from harvesting, gathering, storage, slicing, and transportation; ⑤ The building costs of acquisition include land costs, electric costs, workshop costs, machine costs (crusher and filleting machines, etc.), business license costs, and insurance costs.
Table 2. The amounts of raw materials in different paths after optimization.
Table 2. The amounts of raw materials in different paths after optimization.
RegionAcquisition StationsTransportation VolumeTotalResource Utilization
Supply Land → Acquisition Station → Power Plant (Ten Thousand Tons)Supply Land → Power Plant (Ten Thousand Tons)
Wushenzhao50.53.13.672.24%
Tuke40.43.684.0892.23%
Wulantaole51.11.963.0681.89%
Gelutu50.63.594.1998.28%
Sulide20.32.672.9742.59%
Wudinghe10.100.13.24%
Total2231518--
Table 3. The costs of raw materials in different paths after optimization.
Table 3. The costs of raw materials in different paths after optimization.
RegionCostTotal
Supply Land → Acquisition Station → Power PlantSupply Land → Power Plant
Wushenzhao83.42186.00269.42
Tuke68.89261.79330.67
Wulantaole195.73166.75362.48
Gelutu108.49289.39397.88
Sulide56.25243.91300.17
Wudinghe20.220.0020.22
Total533.001147.841680.84
Unit: ten thousand yuan.
Table 4. The amounts of raw materials in different paths after optimization.
Table 4. The amounts of raw materials in different paths after optimization.
RegionAcquisition StationsTransportation VolumeTotalResource Utilization
Supply Land → Acquisition Station → Power Plant (Ten Thousand Tons)Supply Land → Power Plant (Ten Thousand Tons)
Wushenzhao50.53.13.672.24%
Tuke40.43.684.0892.23%
Wulantaole51.11.963.0681.89%
Gelutu50.63.594.1998.28%
Sulide30.42.673.0744.03%
Wudinghe00000
Total2231518--
Table 5. The costs of raw materials in different paths after optimization.
Table 5. The costs of raw materials in different paths after optimization.
RegionCO2 EmissionTotal
Supply Land → Acquisition Station → Power PlantSupply Land → Power Plant
Wushenzhao39.53170.5
Tuke31.244.1675.36
Wulantaole77.1521.5698.71
Gelutu48.646.6795.27
Sulide32.840.0572.85
Wudinghe000
Total229.25183.44412.69
Unit: ten thousand kilograms.
Table 6. The relevant parameters with the economic costs objective function as the restriction.
Table 6. The relevant parameters with the economic costs objective function as the restriction.
MRNεt
1.00350.905.001751.02
2.00350.905.001821.20
3.00350.905.001891.38
4.00350.905.001961.56
5.00350.905.002031.74
Table 7. The relevant parameters with the CO2 emissions objective function as the restriction.
Table 7. The relevant parameters with the CO2 emissions objective function as the restriction.
MRNεt
1.00150.015.00442.69
2.00150.015.00472.69
3.00150.015.00502.70
4.00150.015.00532.70
5.00150.015.00562.70
Table 8. The amounts of raw materials in different paths after optimizing green jobs.
Table 8. The amounts of raw materials in different paths after optimizing green jobs.
RegionAcquisition StationsTransportation VolumeTotalResource Utilization
Supply Land → Acquisition Station → Power PlantSupply Land → Power Plant
Wushenzhao50.53.053.5571.29%
Tuke40.43.654.0591.62%
Wulantaole31.541.142.6871.65%
Gelutu62.211.984.1998.35%
Sulide31.381.773.1545.19%
Wudinghe10.750.551.342.20%
Total226.7812.1418.92--
Unit: ten thousand tons.
Table 9. The amounts of raw materials in different paths after optimizing green jobs.
Table 9. The amounts of raw materials in different paths after optimizing green jobs.
RegionGreen Job HoursTotalNumber of Converted Jobs
Supply Land → Acquisition Station → Power Plant (Ten Thousand Hours)Supply Land → Power Plant (Ten Thousand Hours)
Wushenzhao17.0030.5047.50162.67
Tuke14.0040.1554.15185.45
Wulantaole55.4414.8270.26240.62
Gelutu81.7725.74107.51368.18
Sulide52.4426.5578.99270.51
Wudinghe30.7510.4541.20141.1
Total
Number of converted jobs
251.40
860.96
148.21
507.57
399.61
1368.53
1368.53
--
Table 10. Results of sensitivity analysis.
Table 10. Results of sensitivity analysis.
ParameterThe Range of Changes in ParametersThe Range of Changes in Target Function’s Value
Green Job Hours (Hour)Economic Cost (Yuan)CO2 Emission (Kilograms)
+10%+359,500+1,454,100+321,600
Raw material demand−10%−282,800−1,910,000−262,800
+10%+224,100+767,500+320,600
Transportation distance−10%−161,300−746,100−255,600
Daily processing capacity of chippers+10%+219,400+640,600+21,900
−10%−158,900−567,600−18,900
Unit labor price+10%+236,600+254,800+75,100
−10%−211,200−232,100−67,800

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bai, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Qin, J.; Mi, F. Optimizing the Raw Material Supply Chain of the Wood Biomass Power Generation Industry for Different Stakeholders’ Benefits: An Analysis of Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051887

AMA Style

Bai Y, Yang H, Zhao Y, Zhang M, Qin J, Mi F. Optimizing the Raw Material Supply Chain of the Wood Biomass Power Generation Industry for Different Stakeholders’ Benefits: An Analysis of Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability. 2020; 12(5):1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bai, Yang, He Yang, Yu Zhao, Min Zhang, Jinyuan Qin, and Feng Mi. 2020. "Optimizing the Raw Material Supply Chain of the Wood Biomass Power Generation Industry for Different Stakeholders’ Benefits: An Analysis of Inner Mongolia, China" Sustainability 12, no. 5: 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop