Next Article in Journal
How You Deal with Your Emotions Is How You Drive. Emotion Regulation Strategies, Traffic Offenses, and the Mediating Role of Driving Styles
Previous Article in Journal
Revised SEDD (RSEDD) Model for Sediment Delivery Processes at the Basin Scale
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Sodium Chloride and Sodium Sulfate on Haloxylon ammodendron Seed Germination

1
State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
2
National Engineering Technology Research Center for Desert-Oasis Ecological Construction, Urumqi 830011, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
Mosuowan Desert Research Station, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shihezi 832000, China
5
Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(12), 4927; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124927
Submission received: 22 April 2020 / Revised: 12 June 2020 / Accepted: 15 June 2020 / Published: 17 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainability, Biodiversity and Conservation)

Abstract

:
Haloxylon ammodendron is a perennial xerophyte that can survive in extremely harsh desert conditions of Central Asia. This study evaluated the effect of salinity, and their ability to recover on seed germination of H. ammodendron, which were collected at three different desert areas, Bakanas takyr plain (H1), Gurbantüngüt Desert (H2), and Gobi Desert (H3), respectively. Seeds were treated with different concentrations of NaCl and Na2SO4 (0.00 (control), 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.00, 1.20, and 1.40 mol/L) to detemine the germination and recover ability to salt stress. The results of the study were that H. ammodendron were more resistant to Na2SO4 than to NaCl. Regarding inhibition of seed germination H. ammodendron was in the following order: H3 > H2 > H1. Based on the tolerance and recovery, seeds can be demonstrated as follows: NaCl: H3 > H1 > H2; Na2SO4: H1 = H2 = H3. Non-germinated seeds in all salt treatments with low osmotic potential showed high recovery when transferred to distilled water, indicating that these treatments were not too toxic to affect seed viability. These results suggest that H. ammodendron can withstand high levels of salinity at three desert environments. Thus, H. ammodendron could be used to reconstruct vegetation and sustanbility development in the desert areas with high salinity.

1. Introduction

Soil salinization has become a worldwide resource and ecological problem, which seriously affects agricultural and forestry production and ecological reconstruction and restoration in desert areas [1]. Soil saline–alkali is a kind of environmental stress prevailing in desert areas, which seriously affects various physiological processes of plant growth and germination. Therefore, it is of great importance to research the influence of salt stress on the germination of desert plants, which will exert important theoretical and practical significance for understanding the adaptability of plants to salinity [2,3]. Most importantly, it is of great significance for the desertification control and the sustainable development of desert ecosystems.
Perennial low-level xerophytic shrubs form the bulk of the vegetation in desert areas. Haloxylon 0 ammodendron (C. A. MEY) is the main constructive species of desert vegetation and has ecological and economic meaning. Desert flora, consisting of H. ammodendron, is the most widespread type of desert vegetation in the Central Asia desert regions. These areas are, however, due to the arid climate, frequent sandstorms and aggravated salinization, whereby the biodiversity is seriously degraded, the vegetation coverage area has been seriously reduced, and the desertification area has increased significantly [4]. Over the years, due to overuse of resources (e.g., over-cutting, land reclamation, and mining), environmental degradation (reduced water resources due to development), and soil salinization, the distribution area of H. ammodendron has decreased by more than 30% and it has been classified as a threatened protected plant (National Environmental Agency, 1987) [5,6]. Consequently, H. ammodendron ecosystems warrant special attention. In this case, investigation of H. ammodendron seed germination is of great importance for the restoration and reconstruction of this species in desert areas. Given their morphological and physiological characteristics, xerophytes can tolerate long-term and severe water shortages [7]. H. ammodendron, as a Xerophyte, employs a special adaptation mechanism to survive under harsh desert conditions [7,8]. It can promote water conservation, prevent soil erosion, and has a high economic value [9]. Seeds of desert plants use a special strategy and germinate at the right time and place to maximize their chance of survival. Seed structure and environmental factors play an important role in seed germination and therefore determine the composition of desert vegetation [10]. Most of the arid regions in China experience strong environmental fluctuations and possess saline–alkaline zones [11]. Salt affects seed germination by altering the osmotic potential of cells [12]. Salinity is a major limiting portion of product productivity all over the world. Salinity reduces plant growth at all developmental degrees; however, sensitivity varies from different salt compositions. Salt tolerance is the result of a complex adaptation of salt infiltration and ionic effects during seed germination [13]. Germination is a critical stage of the plant cycle and improved tolerance of high salinity could improve the stability of plant production [14]. Water is osmotically held in salt solutions. Therefore, the salt concentration completely inhibits germination at higher levels or induces a state of dormancy at low levels. It also reduces imbibition of water because of lowered osmotic potentials of the medium and causes changes in metabolic activity [15]. Seed germination is the product of the interaction of various environmental factors, but the extent to which environmental factors affect seed germination varies with the species and ecotype. However, very few comprehensive comparative analyses have been conducted to study seed germination in H. ammodendron from different desert areas.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of salt stress on the germination of H. ammodendron seeds. Seeds were collected from the Bakanas takyr plain, Gurbantüngüt Desert, and Gobi Desert, and were exposed to different concentrations of NaCl or Na2SO4. The study from the Bakanas takyr plains (Kazakhstan) of the influence of salinity on seed germination of H. ammodendron has not reported. The ability of these seeds to recover from salt stress treatments was then compared. The results of this study provide useful information indicating that the seeds of desert plants could be used to restore desertified areas and reconstruct vegetation in Central Asia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Seed Collection

In this article, the seeds of H. ammodendron were collected from three locations: Bakanas takyr plain (Kazakhstan), Gurbantünggüt Desert (north-west China), and Gobi Desert (Inner Mongolia/northern China), respectively are hereafter referred to as H1, H2, and H3, to explore the operating of salt stress on seed germination (Table 1).

2.2. Treatments and Experimental Conditions

The experiment was carried out with four replicates of 25 seeds each on the three filter paper (Whatman N°1) put in the Petri dishes (90 mm) diameter. Then 5 mL of various concentrations of saline to each treatment and 5 mL of distilled water were added to the control put in the LRH-250 Smart Incubator (Shanghai, China, 2014). It is marked by the appearance of roots. The germination process was carried out twice every 24 h respectively (light/darkness = 12 h/12 h) at intervals from 8 h to 16 h photoperiod. Seed germination was tested at a temperature of 5 °C/25 °C and with a concentration of 0.00 (control), 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.00, 1.20, and 1.40 (mol/L) NaCl or Na2SO4 solutions. To compensate for the loss of moisture due to evaporation in NaCl and Na2SO4 solutions, the experimental sample was weighed daily per 1000 pounds of electronic weight. After 10 days un-germinated seeds were transferred to distilled water, and the cultivation was continued for 10 days under the same conditions.

2.3. Seed Germination Index

To investigate the resistance of seeds to salt stress, various parameters were calculated including germination rate (GR), germination index (Gi), germination potential (GP), mean germination time (MGT), plant length, viability index (Vi), and germination relativity magnitude, which was assessed as peak value (PV), mean day germination (MDG), and germination value (GV). Values of Gi, Vi, MGT, PV, and GV were calculated with the following equations:
G i   =   G t / D t
V i   =   G i × S
M G T   =   G t × D t / G t
G V   =   P V × M D G
where, Gt is the number of germinating seeds at time t, Dt is the germination days, and S represents the length of seedlings (cm) [19].

2.4. Recovery Germination

I n i t i a l   g e r m i n a t i o n   =   ( b / c ) × 100
D e g r e e   o f   r e c o v e r y   =   [ ( a b ) / ( c b ) ] × 100
F i n a l   g e r m i n a t i o n   =   ( a / c ) × 100
where, a is the number of seeds germinated over the entire experiment; b is the number of seeds germinated in saline solution; and c is the total number of seeds used for processing. The initial germination time was recorded from the first day of seed germination. TG50, which indicates the time taken to reach 50% germination, was also recorded for each treatment [20].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Before statistical analysis, Shapiro–Wilk and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests were used to compares the observed distribution with the normal one. Also, to determine the homogeneity of variance of the data, Levene’s test was performed (p ˃ 0.05) to identify differences that occurred between individual treatments. A parried-sample t-test was carried out to determine differences among the same concentration treatment of NaCl and Na2SO4. For comparisons, a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test was used to determine differences among treatments and then statistical tests were conducted at p < 0.05. Simple correlation with the index (Pearson correlation) was used to study the coefficients between the attributes. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24 (SPSS, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2016).

3. Results

Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests showed that all groups were compared to the observed distribution with the normal (Appendix A and Appendix B). Results of test of homogeneity of variances among the treatments was performed using a Levene’s test (Appendix C). Additionally, seed germination was compared between NaCl and Na2SO4 treatments at the same concentration using a paired t-test (Appendix D). Results of the one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test of NaCl salt are shown in Table 2 and Table 3 and Na2SO4 salt in Table 4 and Table 5 respectively. Correlation coefficients between attributes on germination in the concentration NaCl and Na2SO4 are presented in Table 6 and Table 7.

3.1. Effects of NaCl and Na2SO4 Treatments on Seed Germination and Their Recovery after Soaking

High germination rates were observed in the control (distilled water) treatment, and the germination percentage decreased with increasing salinity. H1, H2, and H3 seeds, collected from Bakanas takyr plain, Gurbantüngüt Desert, and Gobi Desert, respectively, were more resistant to Na2SO4 than to NaCl (Table 2 and Table 3). The inhibition of seed germination by NaCl solutions was in the following order: H3 > H2 > H1 (Table 2). NaCl strongly inhibited H1 seed germination at high concentrations (1.00–1.40 mol/L). In comparison, at the highest concetration of Na2SO4 (1.40 mol/L), the germination percentage of H3 seeds (74%) was higher than that of H1 and H2 seeds (Table 3). After 10 days of salt treatment, we transferred the un-germinated H1, H2, and H3 seeds to distilled water and continued to monitor their germination. After the salt stress was removed, some seeds quickly resumed germination. H1 seeds showed the highest germination upon recovery, followed by H2 seeds, and lastly H3 seeds. The germination rate of H2 and H3 seeds declined significantly when the NaCl concentration was greater than 0.60 and 0.80 mol/L, respectively. Recovery percentages were significantly higher in Na2SO4 and NaCl treatmetns at all concentrations. No significant difference was detected between the final germination percentages of H1 and H3 seeds (approximately 100% in both seed types; Table 2). Germination rates of H2 and H3 seeds were the same (100%) in the presence of 1.00 mol/L Na2SO4. Final germination percentages of H1, H2, and H3 seeds treated with different concentrations of Na2SO4 were similar to the control treatment (100%) (Table 3). The TG50 value increased significantly with an increase in NaCl and Na2SO4 concentrations (Table 2 and Table 3).

3.2. Germination Attributes of H1, H2, and H3 Seeds Treated with NaCl and Na2SO4

The effects of different concentrations of NaCl and Na2SO4 on germination attributes of H1, H2, and H3 seeds were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. The germination rate of H1 and H3 seeds was high (93% and 100%, respectively) at NaCl concentrations ranging from 0.00 (control) to 0.60 mol/L. However, when NaCl concentration increased to 0.80 mol/L, the germination rate of H1 and H2 seeds dropped dramatically to 30% and 58%, respectively. H3 seeds were more insensitive to higher salt concentrations than H1 and H2 seeds, based on germination rates (Table 4). At low NaCl concentrations (0.00–0.10 mol/L), no significant differences were observed in Gi among the three seed types. However, the Gi of H1, H2, and H3 seeds declined with an increase in salt concentrations (0.20–0.60 mol/L). Nonetheless, H3 seeds showed high Gi values at all salt concentrations, followed by H2 and H1 seeds. In the control treatment, the GP of H1, H2, and H3 seeds was 86, 61, and 90, respectively; however, when salt concentration was increased to 0.05 mol/L, the GP of H1 and H3 seeds decreased significantly, whereas that of H2 seeds showed only a slight change. At higher NaCl concentrations (0.10–0.80 mol/L), the GP of H2 and H3 seeds dropped gradually, whereas that of H1 fluctuated between 38 and 61. When the salt concentration increased from 0.00–0.80 mol/L, the MGT of H1 and H2 seeds varied from 5.60–14.73 and 5.50–8.95 days, respectively, and that of H3 seeds varied from 2.75–10.75. At high NaCl concentrations (1.2 and 1.4 mol/L), H2 and H3 seeds took less time to germinate (1.25 and 0.5 days, respectively), whereas H1 seeds completely lost their germination. Additionally, increasing concentrations of NaCl negatively affected seed healthy index (SHI), PV, GV, and Vi. H1 seeds were more sensitive to increasing salt concentration; at a salt concentration higher than 1.00 mol/L, all germination parameters of H1 seeds were equal to zero (Table 4). In contrast, H3 seeds were the most tolerant to salt stress; all parameters (except MGT and GP) gradually decreased with the increase in Na2SO4 salt concentration. Among the three seed types, H3 seeds showed the highest values of all attributes (Table 5). The SHI of H1, H2, and H3 seeds showed no significant changed in the Na2SO4 treatment when its concentration changed from 0.00 mol/L to 0.20 mol/L; however, upon further increase in concentration, the SHI of H1, H2, and H3 seeds varied from (highest–lowest) 3.32–2.46, 3.74–2.48, and 4.30–2.65, respectively. The mean germination time (MGT) increased with the increase in salt concentration until 1.00 mol/L, and then declined at 1.40 mol/L concentration. These results showed that all seeds were highly resistant to Na2SO4; their germination rate and GP were not inhibited even at the highest concentration of Na2SO4 (Table 5).

3.3. Correlation of Germination Attributes between H1, H2, and H3 Seeds Treated with NaCl and Na2SO4

The correlation between attributes of germination seeds in the concentration NaCl is presented in Table 6 and in Table 7 for Na2SO4 in. There was a strong positive correlation (p < 0.001) for all seed types of H1, H2, and H3 (except type of H3 for MGT), between attributes such as GR, PV, MDG, GV, Gi, GP, SHI, and Vi. However, it should be noted type of seeds H3 (except GR) in GMT correlates negative with a negative attitude to other attributes PV, MDG, GV, Gi, GP, SHI, and Vi (Table 6). Positive, very significant correlations (p < 0.001) were found between type of seeds H1, H2, and H3 (except H1, H2 for MGT), between attributes (Table 7) such as germination rate, PV, MDG, GV, Gi, GP, SHI, and Vi. As well as all seeds type H1, H2 and H3 MGT correlated with a negative attitude to all attributes (except type of H3 for germination rate) PV, MDG, GV, Gi, GP, SHI and Vi. However, type of seeds H1, H2 correlate with a negative attitude to SHI and Vi. Thus, MGT was a distorting sign and was guilty of a false correlation between attributes except (except GR for types H1 and H2). Based on the results obtained, we can conclude that, with the exception of the distorting variable MGT, there was no significant correlation between the attributes (Table 7).

4. Discussion

H. ammodendron is a widely distributed salt-tolerant and perennial plant species found in the deserts of north-west China and belonging to the desert component of Central Asia [21]. Salinity is one of the important factors affecting seed germination in a saline–alkaline desert environment [22]. Saline soil is produced of the growth of multiple chloride and sulfate salt subjected by NaCl and Na2SO4 salts [23], high concentrations of NaCl [24] and Na2SO4 [25] in the soil leads to the swelling of plants. In a previous study, TG50 and initial seed germination time increased significantly with increasing salt concentration [26]. Strogonov and Mayer [27] separated halophytic shrubs into two groups: as chlorophyte and sulfate; Atriplex verruciferum and Ardices canescens were categorized in the chlorophyte group, and Suaeda galea and Haloxylon spp. were assigned to the sulfate group. In the current study, we examined the salt tolerance of H. ammodendron seeds by measuring their germination ability during salt stress and during the recovery period. Seeds were collected from three desert habitats, Balkash takyr plain (H1), Gurbantünggüt desert (H2), and Gobi desert (H3), and treated with different concentrations of NaCl and Na2SO4. The experiment revealed that seed germination was the highest in distilled water (control), and germination percentages decreased with the increase in salinity. Similar results have been reported for H. ammodendron [28,29], Haloxylon stocksii [30], Atriplex griffithii [31], Urochondra setulosa [32], and Suaeda salsa [33].
Germination of H1 and H2 seeds was 100% at 0.05–0.40 mol/L NaCl, and that of H3 seeds was 93% at 0.05–0.60 mol/L NaCl. In Na2SO4 treatments, the GR of H1 seeds was 100% between 0.05 and 0.8 mol/L concentrations, while that of H2 and H3 seeds was 100% between 0.05 and 1.00 mol/L concentrations. When the concentration of NaCl surpassed 0.06 mol/L, the GR of H1 seeds gradually decreased and at 1.00 mol/L was completely inhibited. Cai et al. [34] showed 0.1 mol/L NaCl facilitated the germination of Ceratoides velutina seeds, and 0–0.6 mol/L NaCl showed no significant effect on the total seed germination. The results of the current study showed that the GR of H2 seeds decreased to 76% at 0.60 mol/L NaCl concentration and continued to decline gradually with increasing salt concentration, reaching 7% at 1.40 mol/L concentration. A previous study on white clover showed that the GR, GP, Gi, Vi, root length, and plant height decreased with increasing concentrations of NaCl, Na2SO4, and Na2CO3 compared with the control [22]. We also showed that the GR of H3 seeds decreased to 87% at 0.80 mol/L salt concentration and continued to decrease with further increases in salt concentration, reaching 4% at 1.40 mol/L. The salt tolerance limit of Camelia sibiricum in the Alashanzuo desert, Inner Mongolia, was estimated at 0.9 mol/L for seed germination [35]. In our study, H1, H2, and H3 seeds of H. ammodendron showed stronger endurance to Na2SO4 than to NaCl. The results on the inhibition of germination by saline solutions were in the following order: H1 Na2SO4 > NaCl; H2 Na2SO4 > NaCl; H3 Na2SO4 > NaCl. Suaeda salsa seeds showed different degrees of tolerance to different salts: MgCl2 > Na2SO4 > Na2CO3 > NaCl > SES (soil extract solutions) > MgSO4 [33]. Similarly, Zehra and Saeed showed the order of salt tolerance of Haloxylon stocksii seeds, based on the percent germination: CaCl2 > Na2SO4 > NaCl > MgCl2 > KCl [30]. Assareh at al. showed that Halostachys caspica seeds exhibit greater tolerance to Na2SO4 than to NaCl [36]. However, another study showed another halophyte Salvia rosmarinus was more sensitive to NaCl than to Na2SO4 [37]. In previous studies, H. ammodendron showed a lower germination rate in NaCl solution than in an isotonic Na2SO4 solution [38], and Kalidium capsicum was similarly more sensitive to NaCl than to Na2SO4 [39]. However, other plant species showed opposite results; for example, the germination of Prosopis strombulifera seeds was more strongly inhibited by Na2SO4 than by isotonic NaCl solution [40], and Shaikh et al., [32] showed on genus of species Urochondra setulosa and Sorghum bicolor that germination was in the following order NaCl > Na2SO4. Similar results were obtained by Kaymakanova on Phaseolus vulgaris L.; in this species, Na2SO4 inhibited seed germination to a greater extent than NaCl [41]. For seed germination characteristics of Halostachys capsica, as the concentration of NaCl and Na2SO4 increases, the effect on many variables is in contrast [36]. In the current study, parameters such as PV, MDG, GV, Gi, SHI, and Vi showed the same values between NaCl and Na2SO4 treatments at 0.20 mol/L concentration. The values of various germination attributes suggested that H3 seeds exhibit a unique salt stress response mechanism and therefore are more resistant to NaCl and Na2SO4 concentrations than H1 and H2 seeds. However, when the concentrations of NaCl and Na2SO4 increased, certain attributes of H3 seeds such as MGT (p ˃ 0.05) were significantly lower than those of H1 and H2. In addition, with an increase in the concentration of NaCl and Na2SO4 salts, the GP of H2 seeds decreased, although it was similar to that of H1 seeds in most treatments. In conclusion, because of the influence of NaCl and Na2SO4, H. ammodendron H3 seeds showed higher values of all attributes (except MGT) than H1 and H2 seeds. This may be because of a higher seed weight in H3 (Table 1). A previous study on seed germination in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) that priming seed significantly (p < 0.05) the advantages of first count (FG), final count (LG), coefficient of the velocity of germination (CVG), and germination rate index (GRI) were limited, while the time expected to recover faster germination (MGT) was increased, and significant negative correlations between NaCl concentration and a positive relationship with MGT [42]. Taking into account the results discussed above, the seeds of H. ammodendron seem very resistant to salinity, as some seeds could germinate at 1.40 mol/L NaCl and Na2SO4 concentrations. However, 1.00 mol/L NaCl treatment inhibited the germination of H1 seeds to a greater extent than 1.00 mol/L Na2SO4 treatment. This is consistent with previous reports [33,41,42,43], which showed that different concentrations of NaCl exert a certain inhibitory effect on seed germination.
Un-germinated seeds in salt treatments with low osmotic potential established high recovery of germination when transferred to distilled water, which implies that these treatments were not too toxic to affect seed viability. Data on salt tolerance and recovery of various types of seeds (Table 2 and Table 3) suggest that H3 seeds are more resistant to NaCl than H1 and H2 seeds. In Na2SO4 treatments, H1, H2, and H3 showed 100% germination recovery. As a result of the recovery, the H1 seeds compared well with H2 and H3 seeds; the GR of H1 seeds at 1.00 mol/L NaCl was higher than at concentrations 1.20 and 1.40 mol/L (97%). This is a very strong indicator of why the recovery rate of H. ammodendron seed germination at a low salt concentration is higher than that at a high concentration, although further studies are needed to verify these data. Based on the tolerance and recovery to both salts, H. ammodendron seeds can be arranged as follows: NaCl: H3 > H1 > H2; Na2SO4: H1 = H2 = H3. Seeds from all three regions showed a high GP. H. ammodendron seeds showed various interactions with NaCl and Na2SO4. Thus, H. ammodendron can be classified both as a chlorophyte and a sulfatephyte. Additionally, the different concentrations of salts tested did not result in a loss of seed viability. In fact, the seeds recovered when they were transferred to distilled water. This is because in nature, the restoration of seeds after dormancy, which was not exposed to high salinity and waited for favorable conditions. When the temperature quickly increases in spring, the snow melts to a certain extent, the water content on the soil surface increases, and salinity decreases [44]. In summer, salts leach out of the soil by flooding, and salt concentrations in the soil are maintained at a low level for a relatively long period [45]. The desert region is characterized by very little uneven rainfall and a lot of evaporation. After short periods of rain, soil moisture evaporates quickly because of high temperatures. Salt in deep soil layers is quickly carried to the surface soil by capillary action. The accumulation of salt in the surface soil creates unsuitable conditions, forcing desert plants to use different life cycle strategies to improve their chance of survival [46]. After the salt is absorbed into the seed, the seed can resume germination, but it is also important that the primary roots and buds have strong viability. High salinity can inhibit or delay the germination of most halophytes until fresh water is added to reduce stress [47].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we examined the germination of H. ammodendron seeds collected from the Bakanas takyr plain, Gurbantünggüt Desert, and Gobi Desert. The results obtained indicate that the germinability of the seed is progressively reduced with the increase in the saline concentration, and H3 seeds exhibit a unique salt stress response mechanism and are more resistant to NaCl and Na2SO4 concentrations than H1 and H2 seeds due to their higher seed weight. Based on the tolerance and recovery, seeds can be ordered as follows: NaCl: H3 > H1 > H2; Na2SO4: H1 = H2 = H3. However, the different concentrations of salts tested did not result in a loss of seed viability, in fact, seeds restored when transferred in distilled water. This indicates that seeds from three desert areas all hold a high recovery ability and these treatments were not too toxic to affect seed viability. In conclusion, the study on germination seeds of great importance to providing a scientific and theoretical basis for large-scale restoration, improvement, and protection of H. ammodendron forests. This can also provide sustainable development in arid and saline regions, and the vegetation restoration and reconstruction of damaged ecosystems in Central Asia.

Author Contributions

Available data collection, writing up and gap assessment and design were done by Z.Z.; methodology, formal analysis, visualization, and writing—original draft preparation: C.S., A.K., and D.S.; while editing and proofing, as well as supervision of the whole work during this project, were performed by X.X.; correspondence Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received financial support from the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Science (Grant No. XDA20030102), and Science and Technology Partnership Program, Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. KY201502003), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971731). Authors acknowledge the support received from all the organizations for the present study.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the team of National Engineering Technology Research Center for Desert-Oasis Ecological Construction, Xinjiang Institution of Ecology and Geography, CAS that give us all facilities and financial support to do this review paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Test of Normality.
Table A1. Test of Normality.
Seeds 1NaCl (mol/L)Kolmogorov–Smirnov aShapiro–Wilk
StatisticdfSig.Statisticdf 2Sig. 3
H1 0.000.143140.200 *0.925140.257
0.050.188180.0910.940180.288
0.100.131210.200 *0.941210.229
0.200.157240.1320.935240.126
0.400.163270.0620879270.004
0.600.247230.0010.894230019
0.8000.33117 0.72517
1.00 na na
1.20 na na
1.40 na na
H20.000.39320 0.67320na
0.050.233180.0110.82218na
0.100.217200.0150.800200.001
0.200.245220.0010.791220.000
0.400.161230.1270.897230.022
0.600.177240.0500.888240.012
0.800.181230.0500.897230.022
1.000.32418 0.75018
1.200.4357 0.6007
1.400.47350.0010.5525
H30.000.28580.0540.76280.011
0.050.25890.0850.85290.078
0.100.245110.0640.857110.053
0.200.251170.0060.837170.007
0.400.243190.0040.840190.005
0.600.175260.0390.894260.011
0.800.159260.0900.929260.073
1.000.199230.0180.911230.044
1.200.329160.0000.751160.001
1.400.3853 0.7503
1 H1, H2, and H3 seeds were collected from Bakanas takyr plain, Gurbantüngüt Desert, and Gobi Desert, respectively, * This is a lower bound of the true significance; a Lilliefors Significance Correction; na, not applicable. 2 The number of degrees of freedom df, 3 the probability of error p, indicated by “Sig.”.

Appendix B

Table A2. Test of Normality.
Table A2. Test of Normality.
Seeds 1Na2SO4 (mol/L)Kolmogorov–Smirnov aShapiro–Wilk
StatisticdfSig.Statisticdf 2Sig. 3
H10.000.144150.200 *0.935150.323
0.050.179170.1500.864170.017
0.100.171180.1740.914180.103
0.200.184210.0620.940210.215
0.400.218240.0040.858240.003
0.600.177260.0360.913260.031
0.800.172250.0550.943250.174
1.000.149190.200 *0.974190.859
1.200.199210.0290.893210.026
1.400.249170.0060.839170.007
H20.000.216110.1580.954110.689
0.050.181140.200 *0.900140.112
0.100.149170.200 *0.904170.080
0.200.179180.1320.897180.051
0.400.171220.0950.862220.005
0.600.140230.200 *0.923230.078
0.800.161250.0920.898250.017
1.000.228280.0010.80628
1.200.26424 0.79624
1.400.196230.0220.855230.003
H30.000.23580.200 *0.85280.100
0.050.38018 0.66318
0.100.210130.1210.885130.084
0.200.231140.0420.872140.045
0.400.191150.1470.872150.036
0.600.189210.0490.864210.007
0.800.28221 0.829210.002
1.000.27922 0.77122
1.200.226230.0030.78323
1.400.28122 0.804220.001
1 H1, H2, and H3 seeds were collected from Bakanas takyr plain, Gurbantüngüt Desert, and Gobi Desert, respectively. *. This is a lower bound of the true significance; a Lilliefors Significance Correction. 2 The number of degrees of freedom df, 3 the probability of error p, indicated by “Sig.”.

Appendix C

Table A3. Test of Homogeneity of Variances.
Table A3. Test of Homogeneity of Variances.
Attributes 1SaltsH1H2H3H1H2H3H1H2H3H1H2H3
Levene Statisticdf1df2Sig. 2
GRNaCl8.545.7535.41999303030 0.0001
Na2SO47.1122.154.849993030300.00002 0.0005
PVNaCl3.363.513.639993030300.0060.0040.004
Na2SO41.200.863.299993030300.330.570.01
MDGNaCl5.512.9310.129993030300.00020.01
Na2SO410.296.375.15999303030 0.000050.0003
GVNaCl4.183.416.729993030300.0010.0050.00003
Na2SO46.165.803.069993030300.000070.00010.01
GiNaCl3.432.025.159993030300.0050.070.0003
Na2SO47.061.252.409993030300.000020.310.03
GPNaCl14.563.522.36999303030 0.0040.04
Na2SO42.751.541.659993030300.020.180.15
MGTNaCl3.598.9514.839993030300.004
Na2SO43.611.423.439993030300.0040.220.01
SHINaCl8.955.1154.62999303030 0.0003
Na2SO41.790.481.899993030300.110.880.09
ViNaCl4.805.175.289993030300.00050.00030.0002
Na2SO412.220.921.96999303030 0.530.08
1GR, germination rate; PV, peak value; MDG, mean day germination; GV, germination value; Gi, germination index; GP, germination potential; MGT, mean germination time; SHI, seed health index; Vi, viability index, 2 Asterisks indicate significant differneces (p < 0.05, p < 0.01).

Appendix D

Table A4. Comparison between NaCl and Na2SO4 treatments at the same concentrations using paired t-test.
Table A4. Comparison between NaCl and Na2SO4 treatments at the same concentrations using paired t-test.
H1H2H3H1H2H3H1H2H3H1H2H3
Attributes 1NaCl vs. Na2SO4 (mol/L)Different of Variance TreatmentstDegrees of Freedomp-Value 2
GR0.00 nanana
0.05 nanana
0.10 nanana
0.20 nanana
0.40 nanana
0.606.0018.180.00−2.33−2.64 33 0.10 ns0.07 nsna
0.8013.276.9310.52−10.55−2.12−2.473330.002 **0.001 **0.09 ns
1.0017.7411.5522.24−9.24−2.12−2.793330.003 **0.001 **0.07 ns
1.2010.589.8015.79−13.23−3.88−8.743330.001 **0.001 **0.003 **
1.4011.4913.2218.62−7.83−7.72−7.523330.004 **0.005 **0.005 **
PV0.004.128.8712.00−0.402.032.333330.71 ns0.13 ns0.10 ns
0.054.4718.2910.58−1.420.762.653330.25 ns0.50 ns0.08 ns
0.105.448.2512.440.241.702.253330.82 ns0.19 ns0.11 ns
0.201.3412.3821.91−6.990.16−1.463330.006 ns0.88 n0.24 ns
0.403.3916.6816.570.980−0.90 3330.40 ns0.43 ns1.00 ns
0.602.318.4915.790.97−3.77−0.293330.40 ns0.033*0.79 ns
0.801.876.294.20−0.40−7.17−1.793330.72 ns0.006*0.001 **
1.002.343.384.00−1.77−4.90−3.863330.17 ns0.001 **0.001 **
1.201.506.088.92−2.85−6.73−3.863330.06 ns0.007 *0.031 *
1.401.1715.875.96−7.10−0.14−4.953330.006 ns0.90 ns0.016 *
MDG0.0019.058.348.34−0.53−5.571.003330.63 ns0.011 *0.39 ns
0.058.6612.5016.01−0.19−2.712.033330.86 ns0.07 ns0.13 ns
0.105.771.5915.66−1.73−3.991.223330.18 ns0.028 *0.31 ns
0.201.37 19.33−6.58 −0.753 30.007 nsNa0.51 ns
0.403.262.037.22−0.60−1.62−0.323330.59 ns0.20 ns0.77 ns
0.6036.311.452.990.94−2.88−3.843330.42 ns0.06 ns0.031 *
0.8017.925.264.531.07−2.45−2.443330.36 ns0.09 n0.09 ns
1.002.511.275.79−8.47−2.34−2.313330.003 **0.001 **0.10 ns
1.200.571.092.03−28.75−4.14−0.323330.0001 **0.001 **0.002 **
1.401.170.984.04−8.78−2.61−4.633330.003 **0.001 **0.019 *
GV0.00639.97456.17443.47−0.68−4.734.733330.54 ns0.018 *0.018 *
0.05367.52993.61178.02−0.53−1.522.443330.63 ns0.23 ns0.09 ns
0.10266.46186.471372.64−1.12−0.481.593330.34 ns0.66 ns0.21 ns
0.2015.36141.711329.21−23.19−3.14−0.883330.0002 **0.052 ns0.44 ns
0.4053.74272.09372.16−3.26−1.33−1.223330.04 *0.28 ns0.31 ns
0.6029.36123.12356.72−6.28−3.79−1.693330.008 *0.032 *0.19 ns
0.8024.60193.85175.16−12.70−3.94−5.623330.001 **0.029 *0.011 *
1.00298.7438.69170.69−1.89−5.00−5.443330.15 ns0.001 **0.012 *
1.2016.3985.53137.72−8.22−4.641.283330.004 **0.019 *0.29 ns
1.4010.7435.2488.87−4.09−2.77−3.723330.02 *0.07 ns0.034 *
Gi0.001.201.291.26−1.23−0.15−0.993330.30 ns0.89 ns0.39 ns
0.052.873.720.95−0.419−0.395.033330.70 ns0.72 ns0.015 *
0.101.982.021.95−0.1190.0692.303330.91 ns0.95 ns0.10 n
0.202.002.611.03−1.94−0.72−0.933330.15 ns0.53 ns0.42 ns
0.400.923.382.72−7.37−1.28−1.203330.005 **0.29 ns0.32 ns
0.601.162.502.04−5.40−4.41−5.663330.012 *0.022 *0.011 *
0.800.671.441.58−17.06−2.15−2.293330.0004 **0.001 **0.001 **
1.000.731.372.63−12.15−3.65−7.763330.001 **0.001 **0.004 **
1.200.572.470.39−11.49−6.51−1.253330.001 **0.007 *0.0003 **
1.400.491.232.61−7.37−7.15−4.363330.005 **0.006 *0.022 *
GP0.0019.188.8712.000.632.032.333330.57 ns0.13 ns0.10 ns
0.0535.0814.246.00−0.85−0.563.673330.45 ns0.61 ns0.035 *
0.1024.748.2512.44−1.701.702.253330.19 ns0.19 ns0.11 ns
0.2024.6612.386.00−2.920.16−2.333330.06 ns0.88 ns0.10 ns
0.4011.5514.6135.552.42 −0.113330.09 ns1.00 ns0.92 ns
0.6041.898.878.250.09−2.032.183330.93 ns0.13 ns0.12 ns
0.8029.6414.3828.00−3.17−1.250.433330.05 *0.30 ns0.70 ns
1.0017.4418.6211.02−6.65−3.65−4.183330.007 *0.035 *0.025 *
1.203.8311.7822.74−26.6−6.11−3.693330.0001 **0.009 *0.034 *
1.408.2514.795.03−5.58−4.06−4.703330.011 *0.027 *0.001 **
MGT0.000.350.540.190.855.60−4.703330.45 ns0.011 *0.018 *
0.051.042.030.661.012.34−3.203330.38 ns0.10 ns0.049 *
0.100.981.490.671.222.15−2.483330.31 ns0.12 ns0.09 ns
0.200.861.970.653.092.66−0.233330.054 ns0.07 ns0.83 ns
0.401.471.851.933.672.542.083330.035 *0.08 ns0.13 ns
0.602.442.310.752.95−1.198.653330.06 ns0.32 ns0.003 **
0.801.871.601.32−6.09−2.847.113330.009 **0.06 ns0.006 *
1.003.331.992.24−6.42−5.023.733330.008 **0.015 *0.034 *
1.202.031.404.16−0.34−8.06−1.723330.002 **0.004 **0.18 ns
1.402.111.810.98−7.14−5.72−4.373330.006 **0.011 *0.001 **
SHI0.000.990.430.253.011.582.863330.057 ns0.21 ns0.06 ns
0.050.580.360.672.57−2.041.063330.08 ns0.13 ns0.37 ns
0.100.390.480.424.73−0.581.083330.018 *0.60 ns0.36 ns
0.201.300.270.401.75−7.45−0.433330.18 ns0.005 **0.70 ns
0.400.520.360.390.88−4.25−1.163330.44 ns0.024 *0.33 ns
0.600.730.590.130.50−0.35−0.043330.65 ns0.75 ns0.002 **
0.800.260.280.193.530.18−7.813330.039 *0.87 ns0.004 **
1.000.380.300.10−2.993.99−4.503330.001 **0.028 *0.021 *
1.200.200.370.46−6.003.142.753330.0001 **0.05 ns0.07 ns
1.400.311.532.13−6.31−0.31−0.843330.001 **0.77 ns0.46 ns
Vi0.003.184.3011.4511.882.563.073330.001 **0.08 ns0.05 ns
0.0520.5920.2314.670.65−0.832.693330.56 ns0.47 ns0.07 ns
0.1012.2714.3416.931.75−0.201.823330.18 ns0.85 ns0.16 ns
0.209.079.1711.89−0.30−4.08−0.613330.79 ns0.027 *0.58 ns
0.406.0413.6417.34−1.01−2.88−1.173330.38 ns0.06 ns0.33 ns
0.606.978.5410.171.71−4.15−5.873330.18 ns0.025 *0.010 *
0.802.235.838.012.60−8.45−9.593330.08 ns0.003 **0.002 **
1.002.214.4410.56−9.87−10.17−5.963330.002 **0.002 **0.009 *
1.201.3014.692.25−2.97−1.67−8.683330.001 **0.19 ns0.0003 **
1.400.812.467.08−0.94−9.96−4.263330.002 **0.002 **0.024 *
1GR, germination rate; PV, peak value; MDG, mean day germination; GV, germination value; Gi, germination index; GP, germination potential; MGT, mean germination time; SHI, seed health index; Vi, viability index, 2 Asterisks indicate significant differneces (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). na, not applicable; ns, non-significant.

References

  1. Wang, F.; Xu, Y.; Wang, S.; Shi, W.; Liu, R.; Feng, G.; Song, J. Salinity affects production and salt tolerance of dimorphic seeds of Suaeda salsa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 95, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Song, J.; Shi, W.; Liu, R.; Xu, Y.; Sui, N.; Zhou, J.; Feng, G. The role of the seed coat in adaptation of dimorphic seeds of the euhalophyte Suaeda salsa to salinity. Plant Species Biol. 2017, 32, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Song, J.; Wang, B. Using euhalophytes to understand salt tolerance and to develop saline agriculture: Suaeda salsa as a promising model. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Du, F.; Huang, W. Eco-environmental issues and discussion in Alxa area. Inn. Mong. Environ. Prot. 2005, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhaglovskaya, A.A.; Aidosova, S.S. Anthropogenic impacts on population structure and floristic composition of black-saxaul Haloxylon aphyllum (Minkw) woodlands in Ili Delta region, Kazakhstan. In Proceedings of the VIII-th Youth International Scientific-Practical Conference of Students and Young Scientists, North Charleston, SC, USA, 18–20 July 2015; (In Russion). Available online: https://tou.edu.kz/images/february2019/esimova_dd/EDD_scps4.pdf (accessed on 12 June 2016).
  6. National Environmental Protection Agency of the People’s Republic of China. List of rare and endangered plants in China. Biol. Bull. 1987, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang, P. Correlative research on ecological restoration and biodiversity in arid regions. In Proceedings of the Academic Conference on Ecological Security and Ecological Construction, Chengdu, China, 1 January 2002. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  8. Gutterman, Y. Seed Germination in Desert Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; Volume 19, p. 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, J. Effects of Water, Salinity, and Temperature on Seed Germination of Several Desert Plants. Master’s Thesis, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China, May 2008. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Xue, L.; Gao, T.; Jin, L.; An, L. Research advances in seed germination of desert woody plants. Chin. Desert 2005, 25, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, S. Study on Ecological Restoration in Northwest China. Geogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2002, 80–84. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ungar, I.A. Halophyte seed germination. Bot. Rev. 1978, 44, 233–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yan, S.H.; Shen, Y. Effects of Ecological factors on salt-tolerance of Puccinellia tenuiflora seeds during germination. J. Plant. Ecol. Acta Phytoecol. Sin. 1996, 20, 414–422. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Jajarmi, V. Effect of water stress on germination indices in seven wheat cultivar. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2009, 49, 105–106. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rafiq, S.; Iqbal, T.; Hameed, A.; Ali, R.Z.; Rafiq, N. Morphobiochemical analysis of salinity stress response of wheat. Pak. J. Bot. 2006, 38, 1759–1767. Available online: http://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/38(5)/PJB38(5)1759.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2020).
  16. Zhaglovskaya, A.A.; Aidosova, S.S.; Yerubayeva, G.K.; Akhtayeva, N.Z.; Mamurova, A.T.; Tsaregorodtseva, A.G. Modeling of age dynamics of mean height stands Haloxylon aphyllum given the level of groundwater in Ile-Balkhash region. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 538–542. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lu, C.H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, G. Population characteristics of Haloxylon ammodendron (C.A.Mey) bunge in Gurbantünggüt desert, China. Pak. J. Bot. 2014, 46, 1963–1973. Available online: http://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/46(6)/05.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2020).
  18. Meng, X. A study on the Influence of Mongolia Desertification on the Sandy Desertification in Northern China. Master’s Thesis, Jilin University, Jilin, China, May 2012. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  19. Yan, Q. Seed Since; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2001. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Wei, Y.; Cai, D.; Yan, C.H. Seed germination characteristics of the desert subshrub Atriplex cana and its ecological significance. Grassl. J. 2015, 24, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Haung, Z.H.; Zhang, X.; Gutterman, Y.; Zheng, G. Influence of light, temperature and salinity on the seed germination of Haloxylon ammodendron. Acta Phytophysiol. Sin. 2001, 27, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lu, Y.; Su, C.H.; Li, H. Effects of different salts stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Trifolium repens. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2013, 22, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Szabolcs, I. Salinization of soil and water and its relation to desertification. Desertif. Control. Bull. 1992, 32–37. Available online: https://africabib.org/rec.php?RID=Q00008418&DB=h (accessed on 16 June 2020).
  24. Glenn, E.P.; Brown, J.J.; Blumwald, E. Salt Tolerance and Crop Potential of Halophytes. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 1999, 18, 227–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martin, J.P.; Elavummoottil, C.; Moreno·, M.L. Changes on protein expression associated with salinity tolerance in brass/ca cell cultures. Cell Biol. Int. 1993, 17, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wei, Y.; Dong, M.; Huang, Z.; Tan, D.-Y. Factors influencing seed germination of Salsola affinis (Chenopodiaceae), a dominant annual halophyte inhabiting the deserts of Xinjiang, China. Flora 2008, 203, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Strogonov, B.P.; Mayer, A.M. Physiological Basis of Salt Tolerance of Plants (as Affected by Various Types of Salinity). Science 1965, 147, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X. Study on Germination Characteristics of two Haloxylon seeds in Xinjiang. Master’s Thesis, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang, China, October 2006. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, G.; Gutterman, Y. Influence of light, temperature, salinity and storage on seed germination of Haloxylon ammodendron. J. Arid Environ. 2003, 55, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zehra, A.; Saeed, R. Germination response of potential halophyte Haloxylon stocksii in different salts and photoperiods. Fuuast J. Biol. 2015, 5, 99–105, (In Karachi-Pakistan). [Google Scholar]
  31. Khan, M.A.; Rizvi, Y. Effect of salinity, temperature, and growth regulators on the germination and early seedling growth of Atriplex griffithii var. stocksii. Can. J. Bot. 1994, 72, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shaikh, F.; Gul, B.; Li, W.; Liu, X.; Khan, M.A. Effect of calcium and light on the germination of Urochondra setulosa under different salts. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2007, 8, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Duan, D.; Li, W.; Liu, X.; Ouyang, H.; An, P. Seed germination and seedling growth of Suaeda salsa under salt stress. In Proceedings of the Annales Botanici Fennici, Helsinki, Finland, 20 June 2007; Volume 44, pp. 161–169. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Li, C.H.; Yan, J.; Cai, D. Germination Behavior of Ceratoides latens seed in Jungar Desert. J. Ecol. 2016, 24, 384–388. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, J. Effects of Water and Salt Stress on Seed Germination of Four Desert Plants Species. Master’s Thesis, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China, 2007. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  36. Assareh, M.H.; Rasouli, B.; Amiri, B. Effects of NaCl and Na2SO4 on germination and initial growth phase of Halostachys caspica. Desert 2010, 15, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Behrouz, R.; Bahram, A.; Mohammad, H.E.; Mohammad, J. The effecte of tow salt NaCl and Na2SO4 in Seidlitzia rosmarinus stage of germination and primary growth. Iran. Rangel. Wildl. Res. 2011, 18, 505–514. Available online: https://www.sid.ir/fa/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=155756 (accessed on 8 June 2020).
  38. Tobe, K.; Li, X.; Omasa, K. Effects of five different salts on seed germination and seedling growth of Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae). Seed Sci. Res. 2004, 14, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tobe, K.; Li, X.; Omasa, K. Effects of sodium, magnesium and calcium salts on seed germination and radicle survival of a halophyte, Kalidium caspicum (Chenopodiaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 2002, 50, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sosa, L.; Llanes, A.; Reinoso, H.; Reginato, M.; Luna, V. Osmotic and specific ion effects on the germination of Prosopis strombulifera. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kaymakanova, M. Effect of salinity on germination and seed physiology in bean Phaseolus vulgaris L. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2009, 23, 326–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Fuller, M.P.; Hamza, J.H.; Rihan, H.Z.; Al-Issawi, M. Germination of Primed Seed under NaCl Stress in Wheat. Int. Sch. Res. Netw. Bot. 2012, 2012, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Duan, D.; Liu, X.; Feng, F.; Li, C. Effect of various salt stress on the germination of Suaeda salsa seeds. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2003, 19, 168. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shen, Y.; Wang, S. The effect of salt stress on germination and seed recovery of feed crops. J. Grass Ind. 1999, 3, 54–60. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  45. Ma, J.; Zeng, Y.; Cai, Z.H. Effects of salt and water stress on seed germination of halophytes Kalidium foliatum and Halostachys caspica. J. Ecol. 2006, 25, 1014–1018. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  46. Kigel, J.; Galili, G. Seed Development and Germination; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ungar, I.A. Seed germination and seed-bank ecology in halophytes. In Seed Development and Germination; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 1995; pp. 599–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. The seed collection sites and the seed charicteristics.
Table 1. The seed collection sites and the seed charicteristics.
Sign and PlantH1/H. ammodendronH2/H. ammodendronH3/H. ammodendron
CountryKazakhstanChinaNorthern China
SiteBakanas takyr plain Gurbantünggüt DesertGobi Desert
Location45°02.096′ N
74°46.066′ E
44°11′–46°20′ N
84°31′–90°00′ E
44° N
113° E
Seed Weight3.79 ± 0.01 g/1000
seeds; n = 10
3.26 ± 0.02 g/1000
seeds; n = 10
4.35 ± 0.02 g/1000
seeds; n = 10
Seed HarvestingOctober 2016October 2016October 2016
References[16][17][18]
Table 2. Germination percentage of H. ammodendron seeds collected from Bakanas takyr plain (H1), Gurbantünggüt Desert (H2), and Gobhi desert (H3) during NaCl treatments and recovery.
Table 2. Germination percentage of H. ammodendron seeds collected from Bakanas takyr plain (H1), Gurbantünggüt Desert (H2), and Gobhi desert (H3) during NaCl treatments and recovery.
SeedsNaCl Concentration (mol/L)Time to Initial Germination (Days)Initial Germination (%) 1Recovery Germination (%) 1Final Germination (%) 1TG50 2
(Days)
H1
Bakanas Takyr Plain
0.000.50100 a 2.80
0.051.00100 a 3.16
0.101.00100 a 3.43
0.201.00100 a 4.29
0.401.00100 a 5.66
0.603.0093.00 ± 3.00 a7.00 ± 0.75 c100 a8.35
0.805.0030.00 ± 7.19 b70.00 ± 1.80 b100 a12.59
1.00 100 a 14.04
1.20 97.00 ± 1.91 a97.00 ± 1.91 b13.73
1.40 97.00 ± 1.91 a97.00 ± 1.91 b14.08
H2
Gurbantüngüt Desert
0.000.50100 a 2.75
0.050.50100 a 3.46
0.100.50100 a 3.79
0.200.50100 a 4.48
0.400.50100 a 4.45
0.601.0076.00 ± 9.09 b24.00± 2.27 c100 a7.66
0.801.0058.00 ± 3.46 c29.00 ± 1.70 c87.00 ± 5.00 c8.40
1.003.0030.00 ± 5.77 d53.00 ±1.92 b83.00 ± 6.40 bc10.89
1.203.009.00 ± 1.91 e77.00 ± 0.85 a86.00 ± 2.58 bc12.66
1.405.007.00 ± 4.43 e86.00 ± 0.65 a93.00 ± 3.00 ab13.84
H3
Gobi
Desert
0.000.50100 a 1.38
0.050.50100 a 1.68
0.100.50100 a 1.73
0.200.50100 a 2.31
0.400.50100 a 3.49
0.600.50100 a 4.44
0.801.5087.00 ± 5.26 a13.00 ± 1.31 c100 a7.18
1.001.5069.00 ± 11.12 b31.00 ± 2.78 b100 a9.89
1.205.0027.00 ± 9.85 c71.00 ± 2.50 a98.00 ± 1.15 a12.53
1.405.004.00 ± 2.83 d87.00 ± 2.02 a91.00 ± 5.74 b12.39
1 Data represent mean ± standard error (SE). Different superscript letters (a, b, c, d, e) in the columns indicate significant differences between means (Tukey’s test, p ˂ 0.05). 2 The number of seeds and the time for each treatment until reaching 50% germination.
Table 3. Germination percentage of H. ammodendron seeds collected from Bakanas takyr plain (H1), Gurbantünggüt Desert (H2), and Gobhi desert (H3) during Na2SO4 treatments and recovery.
Table 3. Germination percentage of H. ammodendron seeds collected from Bakanas takyr plain (H1), Gurbantünggüt Desert (H2), and Gobhi desert (H3) during Na2SO4 treatments and recovery.
SeedsNa2SO4 Concentration (mol/L)Time to Initial Germination (Days)Initial Germination (%)1Recovery Germination (%) 1Final Germination (%) 1TG50 2
(Days)
H1
Bakanas Takyr Plain
0.000.50100 a 2.73
0.050.50100 a 2.90
0.101.00100 a 3.16
0.201.00100 a 3.63
0.401.00100 a 4.31
0.601.00100 a 5.56
0.801.00100 a 5.75
1.002.5082.00 ± 8.87 b18.00 ± 2.22 c100 a7.98
1.202.5070.00 ± 5.29 c30.00 ± 1.32 b100 a9.36
1.403.5045.00 ± 5.74 d55.00 ± 1.44 a100 a11.55
H2
Gurbantüngüt Desert
0.000.50100 a 2.00
0.050.50100 a 2.28
0.100.50100 a 2.99
0.200.50100 a 3.16
0.400.50100 a 3.28
0.600.50100 a 4.15
0.800.50100 a 4.66
1.000.50100 a 5.19
1.200.5077.00 ± 5.25 b23.00± 3.31 b100 a6.61
1.401.0058.00 ± 3 46 c42.00 ±0.87 a100 a8.99
H3
Gobi Desert
0.000.50100 a 1.60
0.050.50100 a 2.20
0.100.50100 a 2.14
0.200.50100 a 2.35
0.400.50100 a 2.49
0.600.50100 a 2.83
0.800.50100 a 3.03
1.001.00100 a 3.43
1.201.0096.00 ± 4.00 a4.00 ± 1.00 b100 a4.91
1.401.0074.00 ± 7.39 b26.00 ± 1.85 a100 a6.96
1 Data represent mean ± standard error (SE). Different superscript letters (a, b, c, d, e) in the columns indicate significant differences between means (Tukey’s test, p ˂ 0.05). 2 The number of seeds and the time for each treatment until reaching 50% germination.
Table 4. Effect of NaCl treatments on the germination of H1, H2, and H3 seeds.
Table 4. Effect of NaCl treatments on the germination of H1, H2, and H3 seeds.
Attributes 1Seeds 2NaCl Concentrations (mol/L) 3
0.00 (Control)0.050.100.200.400.600.801.001.201.40
GRH1100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a93 a30 c
H2100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a76 b58 b30 b9 ab7 a
H3100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a87 a69 a27 a4 a
PVH135 c28.83 c30.50 c19 b14.37 b9.11 b2.18 b
H261 b54 b53 b43 a35.50 a16 b8.94 a1.30 b1.03 a8.08 a
H390 a76 a73 a44 a46.50 a40.67 a10.74 a7.80 a1.88 a0.60 a
MDGH121.58 b22.50 ab18.34 ab15.48 a13.40 a11.10 a3.11 c
H214.29 b14.29 b13.50 b11.11 a12.95 a10.41 a8.13 b3.25 b1.41 a0.74 a
H350 a37.50 a32.08 a20.24 a18.85 a12.60 a11.63 a8.13 a2.82 ab0.70 ab
GVH1730 b653.33 b558.33 b295.24 a193.57 b101.73 b7.84 c
H2871.43 b771.43 b722.22 b477.78 a457.14 ab166.57 b72.33 b4.23 b1.61 a15.79 a
H34500 a2825 a2403.33 a952.38 a702.18 a505.36 a123.90 a63.86 a7.20 a0.96 a
GiH112.96 c12.49 c12.11 c9.44 b6.53 b3.96 c1.02 c
H218.29 b16.59 b16.11 b14.27 a13.18 a7.20 b3.84 b1.16 b0.42 ab0.26 a
H323.75 a21.69 a21.26 a17.65 a15.42 a10.12 a5.14 a2.93 a0.92 a0.19 a
GPH186 a73 a61 a38 a53 a59 a16 a
H261 b54 a53 a43 a43 a36 a36 a19 a7 a6 a
H390 a76 a73 a60 a56 a52 a49 a39 a13 a3 a
MGTH15.60 a6.33 a6.85 a8.58 a11.33 a14.73 a5.80 b
H25.50 a6.93 a7.58 a8.95 a8.90 ab6.93 b7.05 ab5.38 b1.28 a1.25 a
H32.75 b3.35 b3.45 b4.63 b6.98 b8.88 b10.75 a11.03 a5.15 a0.53 b
SHIH15.89 a4.90 ab4.78 a4.43 a3.67 a2.71 a2.92 a
H24.38 b4.18 b4.07 b3.46 b2.97 b2.97 a2.84 a3.08 a3.08 a2.60 a
H35.33 a5.42 a5.17 a4.65 a4.08 a3.26 a2.81 a2.73 a3.28 a1.80 a
ViH175.99 b61.48 b58.08 b41.88 b24.04 b10.98 c2.95 b
H280.12 b70.19 b66.15 b49.11 b39.14 b21.30 b10.99 a3.49 b1.32 ab0.85 a
H3126.45 a117.60 a110.15 a82.28 a63.34 a33.07 a14.43 a7.76 a2.83 a0.68 a
1GR, germination rate; PV, peak value; MDG, mean day germination; GV, germination value; Gi, germination index; GP, germination potential; MGT, mean germination time; SHI, seed health index; Vi, viability index, 2 H1, H2, and H3 seeds were collected from Bakanas takyr plain, Gurbantüngüt Desert, and Gobi Desert, respectively, 3 Different superscript letters (a, b, c…) in the columns indicate significant differences between means (Tukey’s test, p ˂ 0.05).
Table 5. Effect of Na2SO4 treatments on the germination of H1, H2, and H3 seeds.
Table 5. Effect of Na2SO4 treatments on the germination of H1, H2, and H3 seeds.
Attributes 1Seeds 2Na2SO4 Concentrations (mol/L) 3
0.00 (Control)0.050.100.200.400.600.801.001.201.40
GRH1100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a82 a70 b45 b
H2100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a77 ab58 ab
H3100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a100 a96 a74 a
PVH135.83 c32 c29.83 c23.67 c22.50 b14.95 b13.13 b11.02 c8.15 a4.14 a
H252 b47 b46 b42 b43 a32 ab31.50 a26.50 b19.10 a9.20 ab
H376 a62 a59 a54 a46 a43 a35.50 a35.50 a21.50 a15.36 a
MDGH126.67 b23.33 a23.33 a20 a12.50 b12.95 b12.50 a10.64 a8.22 b5.13 b
H237.50 ab31.25 a16.67 a16.67 a14.59 b12.50 b14.58 a11.11 a9.09 b6.89 ab
H345.83 a21.25 a22.50 a27.50 a20 a18.34 a17.15 a14.82 a13.27 a10.06 a
GVH1947.78 c751.11 a707.78 b473.33 b281.25 c193.94 b164.06 b119.07 c67.37 a21.94 b
H21950 b1385 a766.67 b700 b637.50 b400 b454.17 ab294.44 b200.06 a64.57 ab
H33450 b1525 a1320 a1440 a930 a806.67 a615.72 a528.22 a253 a166.29 a
GiH113.68 c13.09 b12.22 c11.39 b9.93 b7.10 b6.67 b4.42 c3.25 b1.81 b
H218.39 b17.31 a16.04 b15.21 b15.34 a12.72 a12.60 a10.50 b8.46 a4.67 ab
H321.83 a19.30 a19.01 a18.13 a17.05 a15.89 a14.85 a13.14 a9.05 a5.88 a
GPH180 a88 a59 b74 a39 a57 a63 a58 a51 a23 a
H252 b58 a46 b42 a43 a45 a45 a53 a43 a36 a
H376 a65 a82 a67 a58 a43 a43 a62 a55 a40 a
MGTH15.45 a5.80 a6.33 a7.25 a8.63 a11.13 a11.50 a6.85 a8.73 ab6.43 a
H24 b4.55 b5.98 a6.33 a6.55 b8.30 b9.33 b10.38 a6.90 b7.53 a
H33.20 b4.40 b4.28 b4.70 b4.98 b5.65 c6.05 c10.68 a10.50 a7.60 a
SHIH14.18 b4.15 b3.87 b3.79 b3.32 b2.53 b2.46 b2.49 a2.60 a2.51 a
H24.04 b4.54 ab4.21 b4.45 ab3.74 b3.08 b2.82 b2.48 a2.50 a2.84 a
H34.98 a5.07 a4.98 a4.73 a4.30 a3.93 a3.55 a2.96 a2.65 a2.69 a
ViH157.09 b54.75 b47.31 c43.20 c32.82 c18.13 c16.65 c10.91 c8.40 b4.45 b
H274.60 b78.60 a67.58 b67.80 b58.79 b39.03 b35.64 b26.09 b21.21 a13.11 a
H3108.88 a97.82 a94.69 a85.93 a7345 a62.81 a52.84 a39.23 a23.85 a15.76 a
1GR, germination rate; PV, peak value; MDG, mean day germination; GV, germination value; Gi, germination index; GP, germination potential; MGT, mean germination time; SHI, seed health index; Vi, viability index, 2 H1, H2, and H3 seeds were collected from Bakanas takyr plain, Gurbantüngüt Desert, and Gobi Desert, respectively, 3 Different superscript letters (a, b, c…) in the columns indicate significant differences between means (Tukey’s test, p ˂ 0.05).
Table 6. Correlation between seed germination attributes in NaCl treatments.
Table 6. Correlation between seed germination attributes in NaCl treatments.
Seeds 1Attributes 2
GRPVMDGGVGiGPMGTSHIVi
GRH110.830 **0.838 **0.676 **0.866 **0.825 **0.756 **0.908 **0.779 **
H210.828 **0.975 **0.818 **0.921 **0.851 **0.820 **0.481 **0.838 **
H310.673 **0.626 **0.470 **0.769 **0.815 **0.343 *0.606 **0.674 **
PVH1 10.840 **0.946 **0.976 **0.787 **0.346 *0.899 **0.973 **
H2 10.839 **0.977 **0.963 **0.826 **0.424 **0.662 **0.966 **
H3 10.858 **0.871 **0.938 **0.776 **−0.329 *0.781 **0.933 **
MDGH1 10.767 **0.858 **0.725 **0.482 **0.891 **0.838 **
H2 10.853 **0.926 **0.887 **0.732 **0.533 **0.869 **
H3 10.963 **0.868 **0.781 **−0.2940.751 **0.888 **
GVH1 10.905 **0.701 **0.178 *0.812 **0.955 **
H2 10.968 **0.834 **0.389 *0.685 **0.988 **
H3 10.816 **0.703 **−0.421 **0.706 **0.861 **
GiH1 10.729 **0.376 *0.918 **0.981 **
H2 10.849 **0.555 **0.625 **0.973 **
H3 10.846 **−0.3110.846 **0.983 **
GPH1 10.647 **0.770 **0.689 **
H2 10.588 **0.535 **0.828 **
H3 1−0.0010.717 **0.823 **
MGTH1 10.537 **0.247 *
H2 10.166 *0.419 **
H3 1−0.310−0.409 **
SHIH1 10.890 **
H2 10.715 **
H3 10.862 **
ViH1 1
H2 1
H3 1
1 H1, H2, and H3 seeds were collected from Bakanas takyr plain, Gurbantüngüt Desert, and Gobi Desert, respectively, 2 GR, germination rate; PV, peak value; MDG, mean day germination; GV, germination value; Gi, germination index; GP, germination potential; MGT, mean germination time; SHI, seed health index; Vi, viability index. Data represent correlation coefficients. Asterisks indicate significant differneces (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Table 7. Correlation between seed germination attributes in Na2SO4 treatments.
Table 7. Correlation between seed germination attributes in Na2SO4 treatments.
Seeds 1Attributes 2
GRPVMDGGVGiGPMGTSHIVi
GRH110.678 **0.631 **0.529 **0.757 **0.543 **0.0540.424 **0.629 **
H210.754 **0.429 **0.434 **0.805 **0.360 *0.0840.415 **0.650 **
H310.534 **0.365 *0.337 *0.693 **0.300 *−0.371*0.421 **0.532 **
PVH1 10.859 **0.912 **0.954 **0.635 **−0.650 **0.885 **0.954 **
H2 10.712 **0.779 **0.989 **0.353 *−0.545 **0.731 **0.933 **
H3 10.690 **0.822 **0.944 **0.481 **−0.882 **0.871 **0.940 **
MDGH1 10.968 **0.815 **0.708 **−0.517 **0.792 **0.833 **
H2 10.984 **0.730 **0.392 *−0.601 **0.603 **0.751 **
H3 10.953 **0.709 **0.526 **−0.723 **0.656 **0.725 **
GVH1 10.833 **0.658 **−0.656 **0.853 **0.876 **
H2 10.780 **0.373 *−0.658 **0.628 **0.791 **
H3 10.776 **0.544 **−0.782 **0.723 **0.805 **
GiH1 10.584 **−0.579 **0.862 **0.976 **
H2 10.375 *−0.499 **0.734 **0.939 **
H3 10.447 **−0.895 **0.895 **0.960 **
GPH1 1−0.2790.543 **0.583 **
H2 1−0.0990.206 *0.331 *
H3 1−0.351 *0.438 **0.491 **
MGTH1 1−0.820 **−0.693 **
H2 1−0.688 **−0.654 **
H3 1−0.902 **−0.917 **
SHIH1 10.939 **
H2 10.916 **
H3 10.976 **
ViH1 1
H2 1
H3 1
1 H1, H2, and H3 seeds were collected from Bakanas takyr plain, Gurbantüngüt Desert, and Gobi Desert, respectively, 2 GR, germination rate; PV, peak value; MDG, mean day germination; GV, germination value; Gi, germination index; GP, germination potential; MGT, mean germination time; SHI, seed health index; Vi, viability index. Data represent correlation coefficients. Asterisks indicate significant differneces (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhumabekova, Z.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, C.; Kurmangozhinov, A.; Sarsekova, D. Effects of Sodium Chloride and Sodium Sulfate on Haloxylon ammodendron Seed Germination. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124927

AMA Style

Zhumabekova Z, Xu X, Wang Y, Song C, Kurmangozhinov A, Sarsekova D. Effects of Sodium Chloride and Sodium Sulfate on Haloxylon ammodendron Seed Germination. Sustainability. 2020; 12(12):4927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124927

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhumabekova, Zhazira, Xinwen Xu, Yongdong Wang, Chunwu Song, Alzhan Kurmangozhinov, and Dani Sarsekova. 2020. "Effects of Sodium Chloride and Sodium Sulfate on Haloxylon ammodendron Seed Germination" Sustainability 12, no. 12: 4927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124927

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop