Next Article in Journal
Decrease in Middle Ear Resonance Frequency during Pregnancy
Previous Article in Journal
Safety of the Hypersound® Audio System in Subjects with Normal Hearing
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Survey of Cochlear Implant User Satisfaction with the Neptune™ Waterproof Sound Processor

1
Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
2
Indian Research Group, Bangalore, India
3
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
4
University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
5
Hospital Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
6
Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
7
University La Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
8
University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service, Southampton, United Kingdom
9
Big ears KEM Hospital, Pune, India
10
Advanced Bionics, Bron, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2016, 6(1), 146; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.146
Submission received: 15 October 2015 / Revised: 17 December 2015 / Accepted: 19 December 2015 / Published: 20 April 2016

Abstract

A multi-center self-assessment survey was conducted to evaluate patient satisfaction with the Advanced Bionics Neptune™ waterproof sound processor used with the AquaMic™ totally submersible microphone. Subjective satisfaction with the different Neptune™ wearing options, comfort, ease of use, sound quality and use of the processor in a range of active and water related situations were assessed for 23 adults and 73 children, using an online and paper based questionnaire. Upgraded subjects compared their previous processor to the Neptune™. The Neptune™ was most popular for use in general sports and in the pool. Subjects were satisfied with the sound quality of the sound processor outside and under water and following submersion. Seventyeight percent of subjects rated waterproofness as being very useful and 83% of the newly implanted subjects selected waterproofness as one of the reasons why they chose the Neptune™ processor. Providing a waterproof sound processor is considered by cochlear implant recipients to be useful and important and is a factor in their processor choice. Subjects reported that they were satisfied with the Neptune™ sound quality, ease of use and different wearing options.
Keywords: sound processor; Neptune™; waterproof; AquaMic™; cochlear implant sound processor; Neptune™; waterproof; AquaMic™; cochlear implant

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Briaire, J.J.; Research Group, I.; Büchner, A.; Auletta, G.; Arroyo, H.; Zoilo, C.; Mancini, P.; Buhagiar, R.; Vaid, N.; Mathias, N. Survey of Cochlear Implant User Satisfaction with the Neptune™ Waterproof Sound Processor. Audiol. Res. 2016, 6, 146. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.146

AMA Style

Briaire JJ, Research Group I, Büchner A, Auletta G, Arroyo H, Zoilo C, Mancini P, Buhagiar R, Vaid N, Mathias N. Survey of Cochlear Implant User Satisfaction with the Neptune™ Waterproof Sound Processor. Audiology Research. 2016; 6(1):146. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Briaire, Jeroen J., Indian Research Group, Andreas Büchner, Gennaro Auletta, Helena Arroyo, Carmen Zoilo, Patrizia Mancini, Roberta Buhagiar, Neelam Vaid, and Nathalie Mathias. 2016. "Survey of Cochlear Implant User Satisfaction with the Neptune™ Waterproof Sound Processor" Audiology Research 6, no. 1: 146. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.146

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop