Next Article in Journal
A Rare Case of Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Refractory Thrombocytopenia
Previous Article in Journal
Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of Adult-Onset Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Retrospective Analysis of 34 Cases
 
 
Hematology Reports is published by MDPI from Volume 14 Issue 1 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Innovative Hemocytometric Parameters and Algorithms for Improvement of Microcytic Anemia Discrimination

Medical Centre Alkmaar, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Hematology and Immunology, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hematol. Rep. 2015, 7(2), 5843; https://doi.org/10.4081/hr.2015.5843
Submission received: 2 February 2015 / Revised: 6 May 2015 / Accepted: 29 May 2015 / Published: 23 June 2015

Abstract

Hemocytometric parameters like red blood cell (RBC) count, mean red blood cell volume (MCV), reticulocyte count, red blood cell distribution width (RDW-SD) and zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) are frequently established for discrimination between iron-deficiency anemia and thalassemia in subjects with microcytic erythropoiesis. However, no single marker or combination of tests is optimal for discrimination between iron-deficiency anemia and thalassemia. This is the reason why many algorithms have been introduced. However, application of conventional algorithms, only resulted in appropriate classification of 30–40% of subjects. In this mini-review the efficacy of innovative hematological parameters for detection of alterations in RBCs has been considered. It refers to parameters concerning hemoglobinization of RBCs and reticulocytes and the percentages microcytic and hypochromic RBCs, for discrimination between subjects with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) or thalassemia as well as a combination of both. A new discriminating tool including the above mentioned parameters was developed, based on two precondition steps and discriminating algorithms. The percentage microcytic RBCs is considered in the first pre-condition step. MCV, RDW-SD and RBC count are applied in the second precondition step. Subsequently, new algorithms, including conventional as well as innovative hematological parameters, were assessed for subgroups with microcytic erythropoiesis. The new algorithms for IDA discrimination yielded results for sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 97%, positive and negative predictive values of 74% and 98% respectively. The algorithms for beta-thalassemia discrimination revealed similar results (74%, 98%, 75% and 99% respectively). We advocate that innovative algorithms, including parameters reflecting hemoglobinization of RBCs and reticulocytes, are integrated in an easily accessible software program linked to the hematology equipment to improve the discrimination between IDA and thalassemia.
Keywords: iron deficiency; thalassemia; anemia; erythropoiesis; reticulocyte hemoglobin iron deficiency; thalassemia; anemia; erythropoiesis; reticulocyte hemoglobin

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schoorl, M.; Schoorl, M.; van Pelt, J.; Bartels, P.C.M. Application of Innovative Hemocytometric Parameters and Algorithms for Improvement of Microcytic Anemia Discrimination. Hematol. Rep. 2015, 7, 5843. https://doi.org/10.4081/hr.2015.5843

AMA Style

Schoorl M, Schoorl M, van Pelt J, Bartels PCM. Application of Innovative Hemocytometric Parameters and Algorithms for Improvement of Microcytic Anemia Discrimination. Hematology Reports. 2015; 7(2):5843. https://doi.org/10.4081/hr.2015.5843

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schoorl, Margreet, Marianne Schoorl, Johannes van Pelt, and Piet C. M. Bartels. 2015. "Application of Innovative Hemocytometric Parameters and Algorithms for Improvement of Microcytic Anemia Discrimination" Hematology Reports 7, no. 2: 5843. https://doi.org/10.4081/hr.2015.5843

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop