Next Article in Journal
Medication Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids in Allergic Rhinitis Patients with Comorbid Medical Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Antibacterial Properties of Gold Nanoparticles in the Modification of Medical Implants: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Gallic Acid–Triethylene Glycol Aptadendrimers Synthesis, Biophysical Characterization and Cellular Evaluation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/pharmaceutics14112457
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimicrobial Applications of Green Synthesized Bimetallic Nanoparticles from Ocimum basilicum

by
Pragati Rajendra More
1,
Carla Zannella
1,
Veronica Folliero
1,
Francesco Foglia
1,
Romualdo Troisi
2,
Alessandro Vergara
2,
Gianluigi Franci
3,
Anna De Filippis
1,* and
Massimiliano Galdiero
1
1
Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Via De Crecchio, 7, 80138 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy
3
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(11), 2457; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112457
Submission received: 29 September 2022 / Revised: 31 October 2022 / Accepted: 3 November 2022 / Published: 14 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nanoparticles and Dendrimers for Treating Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antibiotic resistance is an important and emerging alarm for public health that requires development of new potential antibacterial strategies. In recent years, nanoscale materials have emerged as an alternative way to fight pathogens. Many researchers have shown great interest in nanoparticles (NPs) using noble metals, such as silver, gold, and platinum, even though numerous nanomaterials have shown toxicity. To overcome the problem of toxicity, nanotechnology merged with green chemistry to synthesize nature-friendly nanoparticles from plants. Here, we describe the synthesis of NPs using silver (AgNPs) and platinum (PtNPs) alone or in combination (AgPtNPs) in the presence of Ocimum basilicum (O. basilicum) leaf extract. O. basilicum is a well-known medicinal plant with antibacterial compounds. A preliminary chemical–physical characterization of the extract was conducted. The size, shape and elemental analysis were carried out using UV–Visible spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering (DLS), and zeta potential. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) confirmed polydisperse NPs with spherical shape. The size of the particles was approximately 59 nm, confirmed by DLS analysis, and the polydisperse index was 0.159. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) demonstrated an effective and selective capping of the phytoconstituents on the NPs. The cytotoxic activities of AgNPs, PtNPs and AgPtNPs were assessed on different epithelial cell models, using the 3-[4.5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2.5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell proliferation assay, and discovered low toxicity, with a cell viability of 80%. The antibacterial potential of the NPs was evaluated against Escherichia coli (E. coli), Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), Klebsiella pneumonia (K. pneumoniae), and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) strains. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays showed AgPtNP activity till the least concentration of NPs (3.15–1.56 µg/mL) against ATCC, MS, and MDR E. coli, E. faecalis, and S. aureus and the Kirby–Bauer method showed that AgPtNPs gave a zone of inhibition for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in a range of 9–25 mm. In addition, we obtained AgPtNP synergistic activity in combination with vancomycin or ampicillin antibiotics. Taken together, these results indicate that bimetallic nanoparticles, synthesized from O. basilicum leaf extract, could represent a natural, ecofriendly, cheap, and safe method to produce alternative antibacterial strategies with low cytotoxicity.

1. Introduction

The rapid spread of microbial epidemics with resistant strains of microbes is becoming an alarming cause of morbidity and mortality in the human health domain. Among the multiple mechanisms by which bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics, the production of enzymes that can alter their activity, and changes in the efflux pathways, that restrict the passage of drugs, represent the most common [1]. Reports published by the World Health Organization (WHO) have shown that multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections are a huge health threat all over the world [2]. Padilla-Cruz et al. suggested that if the trend continues in the same direction with the same speed, it will lead to 10 million people dying every year by 2050 [1]. The WHO has identified some bacteria as high-risk pathogens, with intense focus on the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp.) playing an important role in this global health concern [2]. To slow down the spread of antibiotic resistance, the design of novel antibacterial agents is necessary.
Nanotechnologies, which aim to control molecular and three-dimensional structures to create molecularly precise nanomaterials and nanodevices, cooperate with life and medical sciences in a promising way. Noble metal nanoparticles have great potential to be used as antimicrobial agents, such as in medical devices, wastewater treatment, packaging, and dentistry [3,4]. Metal precursors can be converted into metal NPs, with typical sizes from 1 to 100 nm. In detail, NPs with smaller sizes have a large surface/volume ratio and a strong interaction with bacteria, exerting targeted and prolonged antimicrobial activity, even at smaller dosages [5]. It is well known that metal NPs have wide-ranging antimicrobial effects against several microorganisms, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and also viruses [6]. The physical and chemical methods of synthesizing NPs have limitations concerning the stabilization of synthesized NPs, and also have environmental hazard risks. For this reason, green synthesis of metal NPs is preferred, in which phytochemicals with antioxidant or reducing properties are used as a potential precursor for synthesizing NPs and reducing metal ions.
In this study, we used a leaf extract of O. basilicum as a reducing agent. The leaves of O. basilicum have a high range of secondary metabolites, like phenolic compounds, and polyphenols, such as flavonoids and anthocyanin [7,8]. They also have extensive diversity in Ocimum oils [9,10]. The presence of various biomolecules makes this a good candidate to be used as the reducing agent in the process of synthesizing NPs. In recent years, various studies have reported that NPs designed with noble metals, such as silver (Ag), gold (Au), and platinum (Pt), exhibited strong and sustainable antibacterial action [1,11]. In addition, AgNPs have been used for biosensing in different pharmaceutical industries, biomedical imaging, and drug delivery and also for designing antimicrobial surfaces, cosmetics paints, and plastics [8,9].
In recent years, bimetallic NPs have attracted the attention of researchers for their unique optical, electronic, magnetic, and catalytic properties, which are significantly distinguishable from their monometallic counterparts. Bimetallic NPs are formed by the combination of two different types of metallic NPs, which, acting synergistically, can have a variety of morphologies and structures [12]. A green synthesis of metal NP is based on the use of plants, bacteria, and fungi extracts. Indeed, phytochemicals with antioxidant or reducing properties are used as potential precursors for synthesizing NPs by reducing the metal ions. According to different reports it has been suggested that metal ions show strong potential to reduce faster than others with weak reduction ability. On this basis, different bimetallic nanoparticle syntheses have been carried out. Some examples are silver–gold, gold–platinum, gold–palladium [13], palladium–platinum [14], platinum–copper [15], and nickel–copper [15] nanoparticles with potential antioxidant, anticoagulant, and thrombolytic activities. O. basilicum is designated as within the group of medicinal and aromatic plants, with various pharmaceutical applications [16,17]. In addition, we used silver and platinum as noble metals to synthesize these NPs. The antimicrobial potential of silver has been proven since ancient times [18,19].
This study aimed to synthesize silver–platinum bimetallic nanoparticles (AgPtNPs) in the presence of O. basilicum leaf extract as a biological reducing agent. We assessed the antimicrobial applications of the synthesized NPs, and, in addition, we tested a combination of this extract and noble metal to assess the synergistic effect against different bacteria [16,17].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Silver nitrate (AgNO3, ≥99%), potassium terachloroplatinate (II) (K2PtCl4 ≥ 99.9%), 2,2 diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Mueller Hinton agar, and Mueller Hinton broth, were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All components used for cell culture, such as 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin streptomycin solution, were acquired from Microtech srl (Naples, Italy). All solutions were prepared in distilled water and the leaves of O. basilicum were collected from farmers in Naples, Italy.

2.2. Tested Microorganisms

Escherichia coli (E. coli, ATCC 11229), Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis, ATCC 29212), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae, ATCC 10031), and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, ATCC 6538) strains were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). The multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria and multi-sensitive (MS) bacteria were collected from clinical isolates from the Unit of Virology and Microbiology of University Hospital “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy. Bacterial identification was carried out via MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), and the antibiotic resistance patterns were evaluated by the BD Phoenix system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Resistance profiles for ATCC and clinical isolate tested strains (Table 1 and Table 2) are reported in our previous work [20].

2.3. Preparation of Plant Extract and Synthesis of Bimetallic Nanoparticles

To extract the phytochemicals or essential oils from the leaves of O. basilicum, we followed the extraction procedure described by Saba et al. [8]. Fresh leaves of O. basilicum were collected from a local farmer in Naples, Italy. Then, the fresh leaves were washed thoroughly with double distilled water until the dust was completely removed from the leaves. After washing, the leaves were crushed to release the phytochemicals from the leaves. These crushed leaves were placed in a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL distilled water. This flask was heated at 80 °C for 40 min with constant shaking. Once the solution had cooled, it was filtered through Whatman filter paper No. 1. The filtrate was collected and stored at 4 °C for further use in the synthesis of the NPs.
Figure 1 illustrates the workflow to explain the synthesis process of NPs.

2.4. Biosynthesis of NPs

To synthesize AgPtNPs, 10 mL of leaf O. basilicum extract was added to a flask containing 50 mL of distilled water. The flask was shaken continuously at 600 rpm at 80 °C. Then 1 mM of AgNO3 solution was added dropwise, followed by dropwise addition of 1 mM of K2PtCl4. The reaction was performed at 80 °C under constant shaking for 60 min. After 30–40 min reaction, the color changed from colorless to dark yellowish green. At the 60 min endpoint, the reaction mixture was stored in dark conditions for the next 24 h. After 24 h, this reaction mixture was centrifuged and washed several times with H2O and centrifuged to remove any untreated salts and extracts to obtain the dry pellet. This pellet was then kept at 40 °C to acquire the NPs in powdered form. The same synthesis protocol was followed to prepare monometallic NPs (AgNPs and PtNPs). The reaction was monitored with UV-Vis spectroscopy to observe the surface plasmon resonance from the NPs’ surfaces. The NPs of desired weight dispersed in distilled water, and the NPs and distilled water ratio was kept at 1:1 [21,22,23]. Further, sonification for 10 min enabled further characterization and biological applications [24,25]

2.5. Dynamic Light Scattering and Zeta Potential

Particle stability was checked by Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and surface charges were measured by zeta potential via Zetasizer Nano S (Malvern PANalytical, Malvern, UK).

2.6. Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy

Dried powder samples of purified nanoparticles were diluted to prepare KBr pellets (1% in weight, 1 mm optical path) to be used for FTIR spectroscopy in a transmission mode. Vibrational spectra of the extract-reduced AgNPs and AgPtNPs were recorded by an FTIR spectrometer (model Nicolet 5700) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 [26].

2.7. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analysis

The NPs’ morphologies and sizes were confirmed by dropping a dispersed solution onto a carbon-coated copper grid and then allowing this to dry, before performing analysis using TEM at 200 kV voltage. The analysis was carried out by using a FEI Tecnai G2, while the images were captured by FEI TEM (Version 4.7 SP3).

2.8. Disk Diffusion Test

A Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test was used to screen the antibacterial activity of AgPtNPs against different ATCC bacteria, and MDR and MS clinical isolates. Briefly, fresh colonies were used to prepare an inoculum at 0.5 McFarland turbidity. The bacterial suspension was homogeneously plated on Muller Hinton agar plates (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, MA, USA). Different paper disks were placed on the agar plate, and loaded with 10 µL of AgPtNPs, AgNPs and PtNPs. A Vancomycin disk (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for Gram positive bacteria and an ampicillin disk for Gram negative bacteria (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Finally, plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h until the zone of inhibition was observed.

2.9. Minimum Inhibition Concentration (MIC) Assay

A MIC value was calculated by the microdilution method in 96 well plates [20]. Each sample was serially diluted in a range from 0.78 to 100 µg/mL, while ampicillin and vancomycin were used as positive controls. In addition, untreated bacteria were used as negative control. In brief, 1 × 106 Unit Forming Colony (CFU)/mL of bacterial suspension was adjusted and 50 µL of inoculum was added to each well to have the final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/well. Lastly, the plate was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After 24 h of incubation the plate was checked with a microtiter plate reader (Sunrise, Tecan Austria GmbH, Austria) at 600 nm. The lowest concentration showing 100% of bacterial growth inhibition was considered as the MIC value for respective bacterial strains.

2.10. Time Killing Test

To better understand the NPs’ kinetics of action against bacteria, the time killing test was performed in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials International (ASTM) standard guidelines and following the protocol described by Loo et al. [27]. The OD value of the bacterial inoculum was adjusted to 106 CFU/mL of bacteria, which were added to the MHB, and NPs were added to obtain the final concentration of 2xMIC, MIC, and ½ MIC, in a final volume of 1 mL/tube. Each mixture was incubated at 37 °C under orbital shaking (180 rpm) and, then, 100 µL aliquot of suspension was serially diluted and plated on Mueller Hinton Agar after different incubation periods of 0, 2, 4 and 24 h. The plates were incubated at 37 °C viable CFU and a time-kill curve was plotted using each time period. The time-kill curve was compared to the positive and negative control curves.

2.11. Checkerboard Assay

To determine the MIC values of antibiotics and NPs in combination, two-fold dilutions were performed in 96 well plates. The interaction between the antibiotics and NPs was determined by fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC), for which antibiotics were indicated as FICAb and NPs as FICNP [28]. The FIC index was calculated by using the following formula:
FICAB = MIC of antibiotic + MIC of NP combination/MIC of antibiotics alone
FICNP = MIC of antibiotic + MIC of NP combination/MIC of nanoparticles
FIC index combination = FICAb + FICNP
A synergistic effect of the antibiotics and NPs was indicated when the FIC index value was ≤0.5, while they were considered antagonistic if the FIC value was ≥4, and additive if the FIC value was in the range 0.5–1, while it is indifferent 1 and 4.

2.12. MTT Assay

To assess the cytotoxicity of NPs, a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was performed on the African green monkey cell line (Vero), Human immortalized keratinocytes cells (HaCaT) and Colon carcinoma cells (Caco-2) cell line. Cells were plated in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 1% penicillin–streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), at 37 °C, with 5% CO2 in a humid environment. A density of 2 × 104 cells/well was seeded into 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The day after, cells were treated with AgPtNPs, AgNPs and PtNPs at different concentrations ranging from 3.15 to 100 μg/mL. After 24 h, MTT solution was added to each well and plates were incubated for an additional 3 h at 37 °C. Then, formazan crystals were dissolved with DMSO 100% and the absorbance was measured at OD 570 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland).

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Dunnett’s test were performed by using the Prism 6.0 software (Graph Pad, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences were considered significant at a p-value < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis of NPs and Characterization

To evaluate the reduction of noble metal we monitored the color change in the reaction. Initially, the color of O. basilicum was yellow. After the addition of AgNO3 and K2PtCl4 and under constant shaking at 80 °C, the color change of the reaction was observed as transforming from dark yellow to a yellowish green, indicating the formation of AgPtNPs. After 1 h of reaction, UV-Vis spectra of O. basilicum capped AgPtNPs exhibited the peak around 320–450 nm (Figure 2).
Further, AgPtNPs’ size and charge were measured via DLS and Zeta potential. The AgPtNP showed negative charge zeta potential, maybe due to strong adsorption of phytochemicals on the formed NPs. Likewise, they improved their stability and prevented an aggregation of particles. The size of particles was approximately 59 nm, as confirmed by DLS analysis, and the polydisperse index was 0.159 (Figure 3). The low degree of PDI indicated good quality and polydisperse particles. The above parameters made these NPs ideal for their biological activities.
Generally, the zeta potential values of NPs should be within the range of +30 mV to −30 mV to be considered as stable. For AgPtNP the zeta value was observed to be −16 mV (Figure 4).
FTIR spectra were recorded for the extracts, AgNPs and AgPtNPs (Figure 5), along with metallic precursors used as control. A comparative analysis of the above FTIR spectra indicated a simplified spectrum, suggesting a selective capping of O. basilicum extract components covering the metal NPs. The comparison of missing and additional bands between metal NP extracts and natural extract spectra could give some preliminary clues on the coating mechanism. Particularly, AgNP and AgPtNP extracts spectra did not exhibit the intense IR band at 1023 cm−1 (consistent with C-C or C-O stretching) dominating the natural extract, and they showed a much lower CH stretching envelope (in the range 2800–2900 cm−1) and OH/NH stretching around 3300–3400 cm−1. This evidence suggested a minor variability in organic content in the NP extract. The disappearing major features at 1023 cm−1 could not be definitively assigned, though they might have been due to the remotion, during NP capping, of a basil essential oil [29] or of a polysaccharide content [30]. Moreover, AgNP and AgPtNP spectra showed the appearance of a shoulder at 1720 cm−1, suggesting a possible involvement of carbonyl groups in the NP coating mechanism. Finally, when comparing the bimetallic AgPtNPs and monometallic AgNPs (Figure 5), they looked quite similar, also showing a mild amount of AgNO3 precursor still being present (1384 and 823 cm−1).
Further, the morphological characterizations of the AgPtNPs were confirmed by TEM analysis. Very small independent particles forming nanoclusters with an overall size distribution from 20 to 80 nm and an average of 59 nm were identified (Figure 6). Interestingly, the AgPtNPs showed an inner core of silver and outer core of platinum (Figure 6 A,B). While Figure 6C only shows AgNPs with very tiny sizes around 5–10 nm, Figure 6D shows the hollow PtNPs with average sizes of 10–20 nm. The results suggested that the AgPtNPs had a spherical shape with a shell structure, in which the inner core was of silver and the outer core of platinum. The chemical mechanism of the structure formation is not known yet, and needs to be explored in further studies.

3.2. Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity by Disk Diffusion Test

The disc diffusion assay was performed to get a preliminary idea about the antimicrobial activity of the AgPtNPs. The assay was performed in comparison with monometallic NPs (AgNPs and PtNPs). The antimicrobial activity was analyzed against different bacterial strains obtained by ATCC, MS, and MDR E. coli, E. faecalis, K. pneumoniae, and S. aureus. We observed a significant antimicrobial effect in the zone of inhibition against all bacterial pathogens. AgPtNPs showed a zone of inhibition for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains ranging from 9–25 mm. While the AgNPs showed an inhibition zone of 9–10 mm, the PtNPs showed inhibition zones in a range of 6–9 mm (Table 3).

3.3. Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity by MIC

Further, to understand the minimum inhibitory concentration, we performed a microdilution assay by means of the broth method. The AgPtNPs showed good activity till the least concentration of NPs (3.15–1.56 µg/mL) and in the same study conducted with AgNPs and PtNPs, the AgNPs showed MIC in the range of 25–3.15 µg/mL, and for PtNPs it was 12.5–3.15 µg/mL. AgPtNPs MIC was studied for different bacterial strains. Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, such as ATCC, MS, and MDR K. pneumoniae, E. coli, E. faecalis, and S. aureus, were used for this assay. The concentration of AgPtNPs was 0.75 to 100 µg/mL, while the same concentrations were used for monometallic NPs (AgNPs and PtNPs). The bacterial suspension of 1 × 106 CFU/mL was placed in a 96 well plate, and to each well was added 50 µL of inoculum. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C in the 96-well plates, turbidity was observed at different concentrations. The lowest concentration of NPs showing no turbidity was considered as the MIC value. The AgPtNPs showed good activity till the least concentration of NPs (3.15–1.56 µg/mL) against ATCC, MS, and MDR E. coli, E. faecalis, and S. aureus and the AgPtNPs showed a significant rise in susceptibility at an MIC value of 3.15 µg/mL. When the same study was conducted with AgNPs and PtNPs, the AgNPs showed MIC in the range of 25–3.15 µg/mL, and for PtNPs it was 12.5–3.15 µg/mL. The exact mechanism of action of AgPtNPs was not yet clear. We hypothesized that they could exert a direct action on the bacterial membrane, destabilizing it and forming pores that altered its integrity. Figure 7 shows the data for the Gram-positive pathogens and Figure 8 for Gram negative, while the Table 4 and Table 5 indicate the MIC values for S. aureus and E. faecalis and E. coli and K. pneumoniae ATCC, MS, and the MDR strains, respectively.

3.4. Evaluation of Synergistic Effect of AgPtNPs

After evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of AgPtNPs by MIC at different concentrations, an antibiotics checkerboard assay was performed. To analyze the synergistic activity of AgPtNPs with Ampicillin and Vancomycin, the FIC index was calculated for both NPs and antibiotics. If the resulting values were within the range of 0.5–4, the effect was called additive or indifferent. Synergistic activity was indicated when the resulting FIC index was ≤0.5, while antagonism was indicated when the FIC index was ≥4 and above. In this study, after determining the FIC index of NPs and antibiotics, we tested this mixture against different ATCC, MS, and MDR bacterial strains. The results showed a synergistic effect of the NP–antibiotic complex. These results indicated that the efficiency of NPs could still be further improved by combining them with antibiotics against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates. The results are reported in Figure 9 and Table 6.

3.5. Evaluation of Kinetic Action of NPs

To understand the NPs’ kinetic action against the tested bacteria a time-killing assay was performed. The data obtained showed exponential bacterial growth over time without treatment (CTRL–) and with NPs ½ × MIC value. Exposure to 2xMIC and MIC value maintained the bacterial load at constant over time, suggesting a bacteriostatic action. A significant decrease in the CFU number of ATCC, MS, and MDR bacterial pathogens was observed after 24 h of incubation with AgPtNPs. The only exception was the MDR E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains, which showed comparatively less reduction in CFU. The overall results showed a partial bactericidal effect. On the contrary, NPs showed a bacteriostatic effect against E. coli (Figure 10G–I) and K. pneumoniae (Figure 10J,L).

3.6. Evaluation of Cell Viability against NPs Treatment

To assess toxicity of NPs, we performed a cell viability assay on Vero cell line, HaCaT cell line and Caco-2 cell line after treatment with bimetallic NPs (AgPtNPs) and monometallic NPs (AgNPs and PtNPs) in a concentration range between 100 to 3.15 µg/mL. DMSO was used as negative control and non-treated cells as a positive control of viability. As reported in Figure 11, both bimetallic, and then monometallic NPs, did not affect cell viability until a higher test concentration of 100 µg/mL with an 80% survival rate in all tested cell lines (Figure 11). The results showed a non-toxic effect at the highest concentration of the NPs. The result was quite promising, compared to previous bimetallic NPs from plant extracts [13,31].

4. Discussion

Currently, multi-drug resistance and the side effects correlated with use of conventional drugs, require a search for new potential sources to fight different bacterial pathogens. In particular, researchers are focusing their attention on increasing hospital- and community-acquired infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, against which current antibiotic therapies are not effective. Actually, nanoparticles and, in particular, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), are considered a good alternative to antibiotics with a high potential to fight the problem of the emergence of bacterial multidrug resistance [32]. Silver has been used as an antiseptic and antimicrobial against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, due to its low cytotoxicity [33]. For the synthesis of NPs, only a few medicinal plants are used, namely, Callicarpa maingayi, Cissus quadrangularis, Tribulus terrestris, Centella asiatica, Murraya koenigii, Alternanthera sessilis, and Artemisia nilagirica [34]. Mainly, the reported plants are used to synthesize AgNPs, AuNPs, CuNPs, and other NPs. Only a few studies have shown the synthesis of bimetallic NPs (Au-Pd) from Cacumen platycladi leaf extract [35]. In this study, to synthesize bimetallic NPs, we used O. basilicum as a reducing agent, and the consortium of noble metals, namely silver and platinum. O. basilicum has exceptional medicinal benefits. Saba et al. [8] reported the synthesis of monometallic NPs in the presence of O. basilicum. During the synthesis of the NPs, the color change of the reaction, after adding the metal stock solution, indicated the reduction of metal ions during the reaction. The intensity of the color depended on time. As time increased, the reaction color became more intense. A preliminary analytical evaluation was performed in order to gain information about the chemical–physical properties of the nanoparticles. The UV-Vis spectroscopy data of our NPs showed the synthesis of bimetallic NPs, represented by peak formation at 320 nm. The previous studies also showed a peak formation ranging from 300 to 800 nm [36]. Overall, the shape of the AgPtNPs was found to be spherical with an average size of 49 nm, very similar to other previous studies [13]. The potential stability of NPs depends on the magnitude of zeta potential. Zeta values in the range of −30 to +30 are considered the most stable. In this study, the zeta value was −16, so the particles were considered stable. It has also been reported that small size and negative zeta potential provide good antimicrobial activity [13,37].
The phytoconstituents of the medicinal plant serve as a better precursor in reducing metal ions. The FTIR analysis of AgPtNPs from O. basilicum also showed a functional group related to amino acids, flavonoids, and proteins in the plant extract. A strong peak was observed at 1079 cm−1. The peak observed at 3353 represented N-H stretching. Likewise, the peaks obtained at 1023, 1265, 1384, and 2928 cm−1 were associated with cyclohexane ring vibration, C-H in-plane bend, NH3 ion, and the C-H stretching band in malignant and normal tissue stretching C-H, CH2 lipids, CH2 and aliphatic 2° amine, >N-H stretch, respectively [8,38]. Along with the stability, the morphology of NPs also plays an important role. In this study, we found that the shape of AgPtNPs was spherical with an inner core of silver and an outer coat of platinum. TEM analysis of the monometallic NPs was performed to confirm the difference. The AgNPs exhibited a small spherical structure with an average size of less than 20 nm, meanwhile the PtNPs showed a hollow morphology with a size of around 30 nm.
In the present study we evaluated the synthesized bimetallic and monometallic NPs against different clinical pathogens to assess their antimicrobial potential. We assessed the cytotoxicity of different cellular models by MTT assay. They were not toxic at all tested concentrations, maintaining cell proliferation in a rate of 80%. The results showed a non-toxic effect at the highest concentration of the NPs. The result was quite promising, compared to previous bimetallic NPs from plant extracts [13,31]. We tested the antibacterial potential of the NPs using different microbiological assays. The Kirby–Bauer method showed a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of the tested bacteria and the AgPtNPs showed a zone of inhibition for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains in a range from 9–25 mm. While the AgNPs showed an inhibition zone of 9–10 mm, the PtNPs showed inhibition zones in a range of 6–9 mm. In comparison with antibiotics used as positive control, Vancomycin for Gram-positive and Ampicillin for Gram negative, we were able to assess that the bimetallic composition was more effective, in respect to monometallic alone. These results, together with the MIC assay results, indicated that the AgPtNPs were strongly active till the least concentration of NPs (3.12–1.56 µg/mL), while the monometallic AgNPs showed MIC in the range of 25–3.15 µg/mL, and for PtNPs it was 12.5–3.12 µg/mL. The antimicrobial effect of our bimetallic NPs appeared more potent than previously reported [2,24,31]. Our results were consistent with literature data, although differences were found due to growth condition variations and/or bacterial strains investigated. We also performed a checkerboard assay to check the efficiency of the bimetallic nanoparticles on a combination of antibiotics. The results supported the synergistic behavior of the bimetallic NPs in the presence of antibiotics.
The mechanism of action of AgNPs has already been well explained, but for the AgPtNPs it is not yet known. However, a study by Vazquez-Munoz [39] showed that AgNPs could alter the cell membrane, causing leakage, and, finally, bacterial death. On the other hand, another study demonstrated that Ti–PtNPs caused bacterial death due to leakage of cytosolic protein [40]. Based on this, we assume that AgPtNPs might firmly bind to the bacterial cell wall, which may generate oxidative stress. This could also lead to the development of superoxide [13]. The AgPtNPs might interact with nucleic acid and interrupt cellular transport synthesis. However, the pharmacokinetic implications of these NPs and their mechanism of action require more detailed investigation. Use of O. basilicum, due to its bioactive chemical constituents, such as polyphenols, flavonoids, glycosides, and alkaloids, limits our full understanding of their therapeutic effectiveness [41]. Finally, considering the growing global interest in “green production” to address cogent problems of antimicrobial resistance, functionalizing green AgPtNps derived from these O. basilicum pharmacologically important plants is an option in the preparation of medicinal plants in combination with emergent nano therapy methods [42] Indeed, it is expected that the enhanced biocatalytic activity of AgPtNPs, which contain in situ generated capping agents, synthesized from the leaf of O. basilicum, in combination, may have the capacity to serve as antimicrobial agents.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we synthesized AgPtNPs using O. basilicum to reduce silver and platinum salts. In this method, we observed improved stability of the AgPtNPs by analytical tools, such as DLS zeta potential, FTIR, and TEM. The average size of the NPs was found to be ~59nm, with a negative zeta potential of −16mV. Due to the smaller size of the NPs and the negative zeta potential, the NPs had good antimicrobial activity against all tested ATTC, MS, and MDR bacterial strains. Not only tested organisms showed susceptibility to AgPtNPs alone, but there were also a synergistic effect in the presence of antibiotics. The FTIR study showed that the presence of different biochemicals explains the stability and efficient capping on the surface of the NPs. This could be one reason for the high survival rate of more than 80% in different cell lines while treating with the NPs. A future study on the conjugation of antibiotics on the surface of NPs could be enhanced due to the stability of these NPs. Based on their antimicrobial properties, green-synthesized bimetallic NPs from a natural source, such as O. basilicum leaf extract, could be used as an innovative antibacterial strategy to counteract the cogent problem of antimicrobial resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G. and A.D.F.; methodology, P.R.M., C.Z., V.F., F.F., R.T. and A.V.; validation, A.V. and C.Z.; formal analysis, A.D.F. and P.R.M.; investigation, resources A.V. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.F., P.R.M. and C.Z.; writing—review and editing M.G., A.D.F. and G.F.; supervision, M.G., A.D.F. and G.F.; project administration, M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank PRIN 2017, “Natural and pharmacological inhibition of the early phase of viral replication” (VirSudNet) No. 2017M8R7N9 and VALERE project. AV and RT acknowledge PON PROFOOD IV (B64I20000150005) for financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available herein.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Giuseppe Squillaci and Roberto Ciampaglia for their technical assistance during lyophilization. The authors are also thankful to Giovanna Della Porta and Erwin Pavel for microscopy assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Staroń, A.; Długosz, O. Antimicrobial Properties of Nanoparticles in the Context of Advantages and Potential Risks of Their Use. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2021, 56, 680–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Padilla-Cruz, A.L.; Garza-Cervantes, J.A.; Vasto-Anzaldo, X.G.; García-Rivas, G.; León-Buitimea, A.; Morones-Ramírez, J.R. Synthesis and Design of Ag–Fe Bimetallic Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Synergistic Combination Therapies against Clinically Relevant Pathogens. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gupta, A.; Makabenta, J.M.V.; Schlüter, F.; Landis, R.F.; Das, R.; Cuppels, M.; Rotello, V.M. Functionalized Polymers Enhance Permeability of Antibiotics in Gram-Negative MDR Bacteria and Biofilms for Synergistic Antimicrobial Therapy. Adv. Therap. 2020, 3, 2000005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yaqoob, A.A.; Ahmad, H.; Parveen, T.; Ahmad, A.; Oves, M.; Ismail, I.M.I.; Qari, H.A.; Umar, K.; Mohamad Ibrahim, M.N. Recent Advances in Metal Decorated Nanomaterials and Their Various Biological Applications: A Review. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huh, A.J.; Kwon, Y.J. “Nanoantibiotics”: A New Paradigm for Treating Infectious Diseases Using Nanomaterials in the Antibiotics Resistant Era. J. Control. Release 2011, 156, 128–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martinez-Gutierrez, F.; Olive, P.L.; Banuelos, A.; Orrantia, E.; Nino, N.; Sanchez, E.M.; Ruiz, F.; Bach, H.; Av-Gay, Y. Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Effect of Silver and Titanium Nanoparticles. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2010, 6, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phippen, W.B.; Simon, J.E. Anthocyanins in Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 1734–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pirtarighat, S.; Ghannadnia, M.; Baghshahi, S. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Ocimum basilicum Cultured under Controlled Conditions for Bactericidal Application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 98, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grayer, R.J.; Kite, G.C.; Goldstone, F.J.; Bryan, S.E.; Paton, A.; Putievsky, E. Infraspecific Taxonomy and Essential Oil Chemotypes in Sweet Basil, Ocimum basilicum. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chalchat, J.-C.; Garry, R.-P.; Sidibé, L.; Harama, M. Aromatic Plants of Mali (I): Chemical Composition of Essential Oils of Ocimum basilicum L. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1999, 11, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gold, M.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Diener, S.; Zurbrügg, C.; Mathys, A. Decomposition of Biowaste Macronutrients, Microbes, and Chemicals in Black Soldier Fly Larval Treatment: A Review. Waste Manag. 2018, 82, 302–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Loza, K.; Heggen, M.; Epple, M. Synthesis, Structure, Properties, and Applications of Bimetallic Nanoparticles of Noble Metals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1909260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ranpariya, B.; Salunke, G.; Karmakar, S.; Babiya, K.; Sutar, S.; Kadoo, N.; Kumbhakar, P.; Ghosh, S. Antimicrobial Synergy of Silver-Platinum Nanohybrids With Antibiotics. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 610968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zanti, G.; Peeters, D. DFT Study of Bimetallic Palladium−Gold Clusters Pd n Au m of Low Nuclearities (n + m ≤ 14). J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 10345–10356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Olajire, A.A.; Kareem, A.; Olaleke, A. Green Synthesis of Bimetallic Pt@Cu Nanostructures for Catalytic Oxidative Desulfurization of Model Oil. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2017, 7, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kalita, N.K.; Ganguli, J.N. Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Leaf Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Its Use in Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2017, 47, 788–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abdelsattar, A.S.; Hakim, T.A.; Rezk, N.; Farouk, W.M.; Hassan, Y.Y.; Gouda, S.M.; El-Shibiny, A. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Ocimum basilicum L. and Hibiscus Sabdariffa L. Extracts and Their Antibacterial Activity in Combination with Phage ZCSE6 and Sensing Properties. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2022, 32, 1951–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Silver, S. Bacterial Silver Resistance: Molecular Biology and Uses and Misuses of Silver Compounds. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rathod, D.; Golinska, P.; Wypij, M.; Dahm, H.; Rai, M. A New Report of Nocardiopsis Valliformis Strain OT1 from Alkaline Lonar Crater of India and Its Use in Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles with Special Reference to Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity and Cytotoxicity. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2016, 205, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Shinde, S.; Folliero, V.; Chianese, A.; Zannella, C.; De Filippis, A.; Rosati, L.; Prisco, M.; Falanga, A.; Mali, A.; Galdiero, M.; et al. Synthesis of Chitosan-Coated Silver Nanoparticle Bioconjugates and Their Antimicrobial Activity against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ghasemi, F.; Jalal, R. Antimicrobial Action of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Combination with Ciprofloxacin and Ceftazidime against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2016, 6, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xie, Y.; He, Y.; Irwin, P.L.; Jin, T.; Shi, X. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Campylobacter jejuni. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 2325–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Fadwa, A.O.; Alkoblan, D.K.; Mateen, A.; Albarag, A.M. Synergistic Effects of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Various Antibiotics Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinically Isolated Bacterial Strains. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ameen, F. Optimization of the Synthesis of Fungus-Mediated Bi-Metallic Ag-Cu Nanoparticles. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Indhira, D.; Krishnamoorthy, M.; Ameen, F.; Bhat, S.A.; Arumugam, K.; Ramalingam, S.; Priyan, S.R.; Kumar, G.S. Biomimetic Facile Synthesis of Zinc Oxide and Copper Oxide Nanoparticles from Elaeagnus Indica for Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Spiridigliozzi, L.; Bortolotti, M.; Accardo, G.; Vergara, A.; Frattini, D.; Ferone, C.; Cioffi, R.; Dell’Agli, G. An In-Depth Multi-Technique Characterization of Rare Earth Carbonates—RE2(CO3)3·2H2O—Owning Tengerite-Type Structure. J. Rare Earths 2022, 40, 1281–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Loo, Y.Y.; Rukayadi, Y.; Nor-Khaizura, M.-A.-R.; Kuan, C.H.; Chieng, B.W.; Nishibuchi, M.; Radu, S. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Against Selected Gram-Negative Foodborne Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gupta, A.; Saleh, N.M.; Das, R.; Landis, R.F.; Bigdeli, A.; Motamedchaboki, K.; Rosa Campos, A.; Pomeroy, K.; Mahmoudi, M.; Rotello, V.M. Synergistic Antimicrobial Therapy Using Nanoparticles and Antibiotics for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infection. Nano Futures 2017, 1, 015004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Joshi, R. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil of Ocimum basilicum L. (Sweet Basil) from Western Ghats of North West Karnataka, India. Ancient Sci. Life 2014, 33, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hong, T.; Yin, J.-Y.; Nie, S.-P.; Xie, M.-Y. Applications of Infrared Spectroscopy in Polysaccharide Structural Analysis: Progress, Challenge and Perspective. Food Chem. X 2021, 12, 100168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Unuofin, J.O.; Oladipo, A.O.; Msagati, T.A.M.; Lebelo, S.L.; Meddows-Taylor, S.; More, G.K. Novel Silver-Platinum Bimetallic Nanoalloy Synthesized from Vernonia Mespilifolia Extract: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Cytotoxic Activities. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 6639–6648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rai, M.K.; Deshmukh, S.D.; Ingle, A.P.; Gade, A.K. Silver Nanoparticles: The Powerful Nanoweapon against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Activity of Silver Nanoparticles against MDR Bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Biel, M.A.; Sievert, C.; Usacheva, M.; Teichert, M.; Balcom, J. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Treatment of Chronic Recurrent Sinusitis Biofilms. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011, 1, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kuppusamy, P.; Yusoff, M.M.; Maniam, G.P.; Govindan, N. Biosynthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles Using Plant Derivatives and Their New Avenues in Pharmacological Applications—An Updated Report. Saudi Pharm. J. 2016, 24, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chopade, B.; Ghosh, S.; Nitnavare, R.; Dewle, A.; Tomar, G.B.; Chippalkatti, R.; More, P.; Kitture, R.; Kale, S.; Bellare, J. Novel Platinum&ndash;Palladium Bimetallic Nanoparticles Synthesized by Dioscorea Bulbifera: Anticancer and Antioxidant Activities. IJN 2015, 10, 7477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Grasmik, V.; Breisch, M.; Loza, K.; Heggen, M.; Köller, M.; Sengstock, C.; Epple, M. Synthesis and Biological Characterization of Alloyed Silver–Platinum Nanoparticles: From Compact Core–Shell Nanoparticles to Hollow Nanoalloys. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 38582–38590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Saeb, A.T.M.; Alshammari, A.S.; Al-Brahim, H.; Al-Rubeaan, K.A. Production of Silver Nanoparticles with Strong and Stable Antimicrobial Activity against Highly Pathogenic and Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 704708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Das, M.; Smita, S.S. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Bark Extracts of Butea Monosperma (Lam.) Taub. and Study of Their Antimicrobial Activity. Appl. Nanosci. 2018, 8, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vazquez-Muñoz, R.; Meza-Villezcas, A.; Fournier, P.G.J.; Soria-Castro, E.; Juarez-Moreno, K.; Gallego-Hernández, A.L.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Vazquez-Duhalt, R.; Huerta-Saquero, A. Enhancement of Antibiotics Antimicrobial Activity Due to the Silver Nanoparticles Impact on the Cell Membrane. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Selvi, A.M.; Palanisamy, S.; Jeyanthi, S.; Vinosha, M.; Mohandoss, S.; Tabarsa, M.; You, S.; Kannapiran, E.; Prabhu, N.M. Synthesis of Tragia Involucrata Mediated Platinum Nanoparticles for Comprehensive Therapeutic Applications: Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Mitochondria-Associated Apoptosis in HeLa Cells. Process. Biochem. 2020, 98, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Malapermal, V.; Botha, I.; Krishna, S.B.N.; Mbatha, J.N. Enhancing Antidiabetic and Antimicrobial Performance of Ocimum basilicum, and Ocimum sanctum (L.) Using Silver Nanoparticles. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 1294–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Khair-ul-Bariyah, S. An Extensive Survey of the Phytochemistry and Therapeutic Potency of Ocimum Sanctum (Queen of Herbs). Pak. J. Chem 2013, 3, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of synthesis of AgPtNPs from O. basilicum. (1) Fresh leaves of O. basilicum were chopped finely (2) Then, the finely chopped leaves were used for the preparation of the exact on a hot plate at 80 °C (3) The prepared extract was then filtered through a Whatman filter paper No.1 (4) This extract was used for the preparation of the bimetallic NPs (5) At 80 °C, and under continuous shaking conditions in the presence of two noble metals, namely Silver nitrate and Potassium tetrachloroplatinate (II), synthesis of the NPs was carried out (6). The hypothesis was that the NPs formed would possess an inner core of silver and outer cover of platinum.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of synthesis of AgPtNPs from O. basilicum. (1) Fresh leaves of O. basilicum were chopped finely (2) Then, the finely chopped leaves were used for the preparation of the exact on a hot plate at 80 °C (3) The prepared extract was then filtered through a Whatman filter paper No.1 (4) This extract was used for the preparation of the bimetallic NPs (5) At 80 °C, and under continuous shaking conditions in the presence of two noble metals, namely Silver nitrate and Potassium tetrachloroplatinate (II), synthesis of the NPs was carried out (6). The hypothesis was that the NPs formed would possess an inner core of silver and outer cover of platinum.
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g001
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g002 550
Figure 2. UV–Vis spectral wavelength for a batch of synthesized AgPtNPs (peak at 323 nm).
Figure 2. UV–Vis spectral wavelength for a batch of synthesized AgPtNPs (peak at 323 nm).
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g002
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g003 550
Figure 3. DLS analysis. The size of synthesized NPs is 59 nm.
Figure 3. DLS analysis. The size of synthesized NPs is 59 nm.
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g003
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g004 550
Figure 4. Zeta potential value for AgPtNP is −16.9.
Figure 4. Zeta potential value for AgPtNP is −16.9.
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g004
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g005 550
Figure 5. FT−IR spectra of basil extract (without NPs), AgNPs extract, and AgPtNPs extract. The star refers to carbon dioxide.
Figure 5. FT−IR spectra of basil extract (without NPs), AgNPs extract, and AgPtNPs extract. The star refers to carbon dioxide.
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g005
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g006 550
Figure 6. TEM analysis of bimetallic NPs. (A,B): Bimetallic nanoparticles with the internal core composed by Ag and the outer coating consisting of Pt. (C) Very tiny silver NPs (D) Platinum hollow NPs.
Figure 6. TEM analysis of bimetallic NPs. (A,B): Bimetallic nanoparticles with the internal core composed by Ag and the outer coating consisting of Pt. (C) Very tiny silver NPs (D) Platinum hollow NPs.
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g006
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g007 550
Figure 7. Analysis of AgPtNPs by MIC against ATCC, MS and MDR Gram-positive. (A–C) indicate the analysis against all S. aureus strains and (D–F) against E. faecalis. Ctlr+ indicates bacteria treated with antibiotic, while Ctlr− represents non-treated bacteria. Data are relative to Ctlr – and represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant diff. among means (*** p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Analysis of AgPtNPs by MIC against ATCC, MS and MDR Gram-positive. (A–C) indicate the analysis against all S. aureus strains and (D–F) against E. faecalis. Ctlr+ indicates bacteria treated with antibiotic, while Ctlr− represents non-treated bacteria. Data are relative to Ctlr – and represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant diff. among means (*** p < 0.05).
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g007
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g008 550
Figure 8. Analysis of AgPtNPs by MIC against ATCC, MS and MDR Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. (A–C) indicate the analysis against all E. coli and (D–F) against K. pneumoniae. Data are means of three independent experiments. Ctlr+ indicates bacteria treated with antibiotic, while Ctlr− represents not-treated bacteria. Data are relative to Ctlr – and represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant diff. among means (*** p < 0.05).
Figure 8. Analysis of AgPtNPs by MIC against ATCC, MS and MDR Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. (A–C) indicate the analysis against all E. coli and (D–F) against K. pneumoniae. Data are means of three independent experiments. Ctlr+ indicates bacteria treated with antibiotic, while Ctlr− represents not-treated bacteria. Data are relative to Ctlr – and represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant diff. among means (*** p < 0.05).
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g008
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g009 550
Figure 9. Synergistic, additive or antagonistic effect against AgPtNPs and antibiotics (ampicillin and vancomycin). (A–C) panels clarify the synergistic effect against S. aureus ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strain. (D−F) panels indicate the additive effect against E. faecalis ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strains. (G–I) panels indicate the synergistic effect against E. coli ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strains. Lastly, (J–L) panels indicate the additive and synergistic effects against K. pneumoniae ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strain. NP: nanoparticles; Ab: antibiotic. Data are means of three independent experiments. Significant diff. among means **: p < 0.01.
Figure 9. Synergistic, additive or antagonistic effect against AgPtNPs and antibiotics (ampicillin and vancomycin). (A–C) panels clarify the synergistic effect against S. aureus ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strain. (D−F) panels indicate the additive effect against E. faecalis ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strains. (G–I) panels indicate the synergistic effect against E. coli ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strains. Lastly, (J–L) panels indicate the additive and synergistic effects against K. pneumoniae ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strain. NP: nanoparticles; Ab: antibiotic. Data are means of three independent experiments. Significant diff. among means **: p < 0.01.
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g009
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g010 550
Figure 10. Bactericidal and bacteriostatic effect of AgPtNPs against different bacteria. (A–C) indicate the analysis against all S. aureus strains, (D–F) against E. faecalis, (G–I) against E. coli, and (J–L) against K. pneumoniae. Data are means of three independent experiments. CTR+ indicates bacteria treated with antibiotic, while CTR− represents not-treated bacteria. Data are relative to Ab- and represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Figure 10. Bactericidal and bacteriostatic effect of AgPtNPs against different bacteria. (A–C) indicate the analysis against all S. aureus strains, (D–F) against E. faecalis, (G–I) against E. coli, and (J–L) against K. pneumoniae. Data are means of three independent experiments. CTR+ indicates bacteria treated with antibiotic, while CTR− represents not-treated bacteria. Data are relative to Ab- and represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g010
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g011 550
Figure 11. MTT assay on different cells lines. (A) Vero cells (B) HaCaT cells and (C) Caco-2 cells. Not treated cells were used as positive control (Ctlr+), while DMSO was used as negative control (Ctlr−). Data are means of three independent experiments ***: p < 0.001; ns: not significant, relative to Ctlr+.
Figure 11. MTT assay on different cells lines. (A) Vero cells (B) HaCaT cells and (C) Caco-2 cells. Not treated cells were used as positive control (Ctlr+), while DMSO was used as negative control (Ctlr−). Data are means of three independent experiments ***: p < 0.001; ns: not significant, relative to Ctlr+.
Pharmaceutics 14 02457 g011
Table
Table 1. Antibiotic resistance profiles of ATCC strains used in the study (S: susceptibility; R: resistant bacterial strain).
Table 1. Antibiotic resistance profiles of ATCC strains used in the study (S: susceptibility; R: resistant bacterial strain).
Antibiotic Resistance Profile of the ATCC Bacterial Strains
AntibioticsMIC (mg/L)Interpretation
S. aureus ATCC 6538
Fusidic acid≤0.5S
Daptomycin0.25S
Erythromycin≤0.25S
Fosfomycin≤8S
Gentamicin≤0.5S
Linezolid2S
Levofloxacin≤0.12S
Oxacillin≤0.25S
Teicoplanin≤0.5S
Tetracycline≤1S
Tigecycline≤0.12S
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole≤10S
Vancomycin0.5S
Penicillin≤0.03S
Rifampicin≤0.03S
E. faecalis ATCC 29212
Ampicillin2S
Gentamicin/syn500S
Imipenem1S
Linezolid2S
Teicoplanin0.5S
Tigecycline0.12S
Vancomycin2S
Cefuroxime64R
E. coli ATCC 11229
Amikacin2S
Amoxicillin/clavulanate2S
Ampicillin8S
Cefepime1S
Cefotaxime1S
Ceftazidime1S
Cefuroxime4S
Ciprofloxacin0.25S
Ertapenem0.5S
Fosfomycin16S
Gentamicin1S
Imipenem0.25S
Levofloxacin0.5S
Meropenem0.25S
Piperacillin8S
Piperacillin/tazobactam4S
Tobramycin1S
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole20S
Tigecycline0.5S
K. pneumoniae ATCC 10031
Ciprofloxacin0.25S
Fosfomycin16S
Ampicillin8S
Gentamicin1S
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole20S
Amikacin2S
Amoxicillin/clavulanate2S
Cefepime1S
Cefotaxime1S
Cefotaxime1S
Ertapenem0.5S
Imipenem0.5S
Meropenem0.25S
Piperacillin/tazobactam4S
Colistin0.5S
Table
Table 2. Antibiotic resistance profiles of the clinical isolates used in the study [20].
Table 2. Antibiotic resistance profiles of the clinical isolates used in the study [20].
Antibiotic Resistance Profile of the Clinical Isolated Bacteria
AntibioticsMIC (mg/L)Interpretation
S. aureus MS
Fusidic acid0.5S
Daptomycin0.25S
Erythromycin0.25S
Fosfomycin8S
Gentamicin0.5S
Linezolid2S
Levofloxacin0.12S
Oxacillin0.25S
Teicoplanin0.5S
Tetracycline1S
Tigecycline0.12S
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole10S
Vancomycin0.5S
Penicillin0.03S
S. aureus MDR
Fusidic acid0.5S
Daptomycin0.25S
Erythromycin4R
Fosfomycin64R
Gentamicin8R
Linezolid2S
Levofloxacin8R
Oxacillin2R
Teicoplanin0.5S
Tetracycline1S
Tigecycline0.12S
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole20S
Vancomycin0.5S
Penicillin0.25R
Rifampicin2R
E. faecalis MS
Ampicillin2S
Gentamicin/syn500S
Imipenem2S
Linezolid2S
Teicoplanin0.5S
Tigecycline0.25S
Vancomycin2S
Cefuroxime64R
E. faecalis MDR
Ampicillin8R
Gentamicin/syn500R
Imipenem8R
Linezolid2S
Teicoplanin0.5S
Tigecycline0.25R
Vancomycin2S
E. coli MS
Amikacin2S
Amoxicillin/clavulanate2S
Ampicillin8S
Cefepime1S
Cefotaxime1S
Ceftazidime1S
Cefuroxime4S
Ciprofloxacin0.25S
Ertapenem0.5S
Fosfomycin16S
Gentamicin1S
Imipenem0.25S
Levofloxacin0.5S
Meropenem0.25S
Piperacillin8S
Piperacillin/tazobactam4S
Tobramycin1S
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole20S
Tigecycline0.5S
E. coli MDR
Amikacin16R
Amoxicillin/clavulanate32/2R
Ampicillin8R
Cefepime8R
Cefotaxime4R
Ceftazidime8R
Cefuroxime8R
Ciprofloxacin1R
Ertapenem0.25R
Fosfomycin16R
Gentamicin4R
Imipenem0.25R
Levofloxacin2R
Meropenem0.125R
Piperacillin16R
Piperacillin/tazobactam16/4R
Tobramycin4R
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole1/19R
Tigecycline1R
K. pneumoniae MS
Ciprofloxacin0.25S
Fosfomycin16S
Ampicillin1S
Gentamicin20S
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole2S
Amikacin8S
Amoxicillin/clavulanate2S
Cefepime1S
Cefotaxime1S
Cefotaxime1S
Ertapenem0.5S
Imipenem0.25S
Meropenem0.25S
Piperacillin/tazobactam4S
Colistin0.5S
K. pneumoniae MDR
Ciprofloxacin4R
Fosfomycin64S
Ampicillin1S
Gentamicin320R
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole64R
Amikacin32R
Amoxicillin/clavulanate8R
Cefepime64R
Cefotaxime64R
Cefotaxime64R
Ertapenem8R
Imipenem16R
Meropenem16R
Piperacillin/tazobactam128R
Colistin0.5S
Table
Table 3. Inhibition zone (mm) of AgPtNPs against ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strains. (±SD 3 replicates tested). Positive Control is Vancomycin for Gram-positive and Ampicillin for Gram-negative.
Table 3. Inhibition zone (mm) of AgPtNPs against ATCC, MS and MDR bacterial strains. (±SD 3 replicates tested). Positive Control is Vancomycin for Gram-positive and Ampicillin for Gram-negative.
Bacterial StrainZone of Inhibition (mm)
AgPtNPsAgNPs
Alone		PtNPs
Alone		Control Positive
S. aureus ATCC14.3 ± 1.3749.3 ± 0.6086.2 ± 0.26430.76 ± 0.737
S. aureus MS18.56 ± 1.0409.03 ± 0.0577.76 ± 0.25131.3 ± 0.793
S. aureus MDR21.43 ± 0.89610.66 ± 0.5779.43 ± 0.51331.72 ± 2.44
E. coli ATCC13.87 ± 1.2058.33 ± 0.5776.46 ± 0.50337.76 ± 2.21
E. coli MS9.633 ± 0.7216.23 ± 0.3216 ± 036.63 ± 1.35
E. coli MDR14.9 ± 1.0698.8 ± 0.4356.83 ± 0.28838.86 ± 1.001
E. faecalis ATCC18.9 ± 0.9509.56 ± 0.5139.53 ± 0.5030.73 ± 0.763
E. faecalis MS21.033 ± 0.65010.96 ± 0.9509.2 ± 0.34629.46 ± 0.602
E. faecalis MDR23.16 ± 0.4729.9 ± 0.8549.8 ± 0.17329.5 ± 1.539
K. pneumoniae ATCC13.63 ± 0.5509.63 ± 0.5506.66 ± 0.57737.2 ± 2.264
K. pneumoniae MS18.4 ± 0.7817.3 ± 0.6086.33 ± 0.57738.53 ± 1.266
K. pneumoniae MDR19.86 ± 0.1159.6 ± 0.5298.83 ± 0.28838.46 ± 1.3012
Table
Table 4. Minimum inhibitory concentration of bimetallic and monometallic NPs against all Gram-positive bacteria.
Table 4. Minimum inhibitory concentration of bimetallic and monometallic NPs against all Gram-positive bacteria.
Bacterial StrainMIC Value (µg/mL)
AgPtNPsAgNPsPtNPs
S. aureusATCC3.126.2512.5
S. aureus MS1.563.123.12
S. aureus MDR1.566.253.12
E. faecalisATCC3.123.126.25
E. faecalis MS3.126.256.25
E. faecalis MDR3.126.2512.5
Table
Table 5. Minimum inhibitory concentration of bimetallic and monometallic NPs against all Gram-negative bacterial strains.
Table 5. Minimum inhibitory concentration of bimetallic and monometallic NPs against all Gram-negative bacterial strains.
Bacterial StrainMIC Value (µg/mL)
AgPtNPsAgNPsPtNPs
E. coli ATCC1.562525
E. coli MS1.566.256.25
E. coli MDR3.256.2512.5
K. pneumoniae ATCC3.2512.512.5
K. pneumoniae MS1.5612.56.25
K. pneumoniae MDR1.566.256.25
Table
Table 6. Interpretation of checkerboard assay.
Table 6. Interpretation of checkerboard assay.
Test OrganismFIC IndexEffect
S. aureusATCC0Synergistic effect
S. aureus MS0.46Synergistic effect
S. aureus MDR0.5Synergistic effect
E. coli ATCC0.326Synergistic effect
E. coli MS0.45Synergistic effect
E. coli MDR0.376Synergistic effect
E. faecalisATCC0.46Synergistic effect
E. faecalis MS0.66Additive effect
E. faecalis MDR0.5Additive effect
K. pneumoniae ATCC0.31Synergistic effect
K. pneumoniae MS0.31Synergistic effect
K. pneumoniae MDR0.75Additive effect
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

More, P.R.; Zannella, C.; Folliero, V.; Foglia, F.; Troisi, R.; Vergara, A.; Franci, G.; De Filippis, A.; Galdiero, M. Antimicrobial Applications of Green Synthesized Bimetallic Nanoparticles from Ocimum basilicum. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2457. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112457

AMA Style

More PR, Zannella C, Folliero V, Foglia F, Troisi R, Vergara A, Franci G, De Filippis A, Galdiero M. Antimicrobial Applications of Green Synthesized Bimetallic Nanoparticles from Ocimum basilicum. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(11):2457. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112457

Chicago/Turabian Style

More, Pragati Rajendra, Carla Zannella, Veronica Folliero, Francesco Foglia, Romualdo Troisi, Alessandro Vergara, Gianluigi Franci, Anna De Filippis, and Massimiliano Galdiero. 2022. "Antimicrobial Applications of Green Synthesized Bimetallic Nanoparticles from Ocimum basilicum" Pharmaceutics 14, no. 11: 2457. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112457

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop