Next Article in Journal
Initial In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Amikacin-Deoxycholate Hydrophobic Salt Delivers New Insights on Amikacin Partition in Blood and Tissues
Previous Article in Journal
Involvement of Organic Anion Transporters in the Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interaction of Rosmarinic Acid
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/pharmaceutics13010084
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cyclodextrin Diethyldithiocarbamate Copper II Inclusion Complexes: A Promising Chemotherapeutic Delivery System against Chemoresistant Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Lines

by
Ammar Said Suliman
1,
Mouhamad Khoder
2,
Ibrahim Tolaymat
1,
Matt Webster
1,
Raid G. Alany
2,
Weiguang Wang
3,
Abdelbary Elhissi
4 and
Mohammad Najlah
1,*
1
Pharmaceutical Research Group, School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Bishops Hall Lane, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
2
School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University London, Kingston Upon Thames, London KT1 2EE, UK
3
Faculty of Science & Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK
4
College of Pharmacy and Office of the Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(1), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010084
Submission received: 6 December 2020 / Revised: 29 December 2020 / Accepted: 5 January 2021 / Published: 10 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Pharmacy and Formulation)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Diethyldithiocarbamate Copper II (DDC-Cu) has shown potent anticancer activity against a wide range of cancer cells, but further investigations are hindered by its practical insolubility in water. In this study, inclusion complexes of DDC-Cu with hydroxypropyl beta-cyclodextrin (HP) or sulfobutyl ether beta-cyclodextrin (SBE) were prepared and investigated as an approach to enhance the apparent solubility of DDC-Cu. Formulations were prepared by simple mixing of DDC-Cu with both cyclodextrin (CDs) at room temperature. Phase solubility assessments of the resulting solutions were performed. DDC-Cu CD solutions were freeze-dried for further characterisations by DSC, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and FT-IR. Stability and cytotoxicity studies were also performed to investigate the maintenance of DDC-Cu anticancer activity. The phase solubility profile deviated positively from the linearity (Ap type) showing significant solubility enhancement of the DDC-Cu in both CD solutions (approximately 4 mg/mL at 20% w/w CD solutions). The DSC and TGA analysis confirmed the solid solution status of DDC-Cu in CD. The resulting solutions of DDC-Cu were stable for 28 days and conveyed the anticancer activity of DDC-Cu on chemoresistant triple negative breast cancer cell lines, with IC50 values less than 200 nM. Overall, cyclodextrin DDC-Cu complexes offer a great potential for anticancer applications, as evidenced by their very positive effects against chemoresistant triple negative breast cancer cells.

1. Introduction

Diethyldithiocarbamate copper (II) (DDC-Cu) consists of two molecules of diethyldithiocarbamic acid (DDC), a disulfiram (DS) metabolite, with one ion of copper II [1,2]. DS, clinically used as an anti-alcoholism drug, has been recently shown to possess potent anticancer activities against a wide range of cancers including colon, breast, lung, prostate, ovarian, cervical and brain cancers [1,3,4]. Additionally, the anticancer activity of DS includes effective termination of drug-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) and reverses chemoresistance [3,5]. However, the biological instability of DS in bloodstream has severely limited its clinical use in anti-cancer therapy [3]. Disulfiram chelates copper II to produce the complex DDC-Cu (Figure 1). The formation of this complex generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), inducing cancer cell death [1]. However, the anticancer activity of DSF/Cu is not limited to instantaneous stress induced by ROS but also includes other mechanisms such as the inhibition of NF-κB pathways [2,6]. The anti-cancer activity of DSF is completely dependent on the supplementation of copper II [2,7]. Therefore, the preformed complex DDC-Cu itself has shown strong cytotoxicity against cancer cells when applied directly [1]. Interestingly, it has been reported that DS-copper complex (DDC-Cu) is a potent proteasome inhibitor inducing apoptosis in cancer cells but not normal, immortalized breast epithelial cells [2,8]. More recently, Liu et al. have shown that DS/Cu is specifically toxic to breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and T47D) and spares normal cell lines (HeCV and MCF10A) [9].
However, the realisation of DDC-Cu as a new anticancer therapeutic agent is limited by its very poor solubility in water. Previous attempts to circumvent this issue are mainly based on a “split” delivery of both DDC (water-soluble) and a solution of copper salt. The reaction between both was meant to take place at the cancer cells to produce the anti-cancer action of DDC-Cu [10]. However, this reaction was not localised to cancer tissue and insoluble crystals of DDC-Cu were still instantly formed, reducing the effective fraction [1]. Recently, Marengo et al. have followed similar “split” approach but by loading copper salts to the lipid phase of PEGylated hyaluronic acid liposome encapsulating saturated solution of DDC-sodium [11]. This method might theoretically offer a slight enhancement in the solubility of DDC-Cu in liposomal dispersions; however, no long-term stability was proven. The lipid bilayer would be depleted of Cu2+ chelated by DDC, consequently, DDC-Cu crystals might be precipitated or adsorbed onto the external liposomal surfaces [11].
CDs are cyclic oligosaccharides produced by the enzymatic degradation of starch, where glucose residues link together by α-1,4 glycosidic bonds and form macrocyclic molecules. According to the number of glucose subunits, CDs are categorized into α-CD, β-CD, and γ-CD, consisting of 6, 7, and 8 glucopyranose units, respectively [12,13]. The unique truncated-cone-shaped structure of CDs, with hydrophilic surfaces and hydrophobic cavities, enabled them to form inclusion complex with poorly soluble drugs. The resulting CD-drug inclusion complexes are known to enhance drug solubility, aqueous stability, and shelf-life [14,15,16]. Furthermore, hydroxypropyl beta-cyclodextrin (HP) and sulfobutyl ether beta-cyclodextrin (SBE) were classified by FDA as inactive pharmaceutical excipients, i.e., both could be used in parenteral formulations with lower cytotoxic effects compared to that of β-CD [14,17,18].
Despite the predominant interest in the wide spectrum anticancer activity of disulfiram in the presence of copper, there has been limited research on proposing the resulting complex DDC-Cu for cancer treatment. This is mainly due to the fact that this anticancer material is not only practically insoluble in water but also cumbersome when loaded to liquid formulations. Therefore, the development of stable water solution of DDC-Cu is needed to allow further investigations on the potential use of this complex in the treatment of cancer. In this study, we aim to report the preparation and characterization of inclusion complexes formed by DDC-Cu and beta-CD derivatives HP or SBE for enhanced apparent solubility of DDC-Cu. The resulting formulations were freeze-dried (lyophilized) to assess drug-in-solution stability and amenability to be used in novel anticancer applications. The impact of inclusion on the cancer activity were also evaluated by MTT assay using triple negative breast cancer cell lines.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Copper (II) Diethyldithiocarbamate (DDC-Cu) (molecular weight = 360.07 g/mole and +97.0% purity) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. HP (molecular weight = 1555 g/mol) and SBE (molecular weight = 2242.05 g/mole) were both purchased from Glentham, Wiltshire, UK. M.D. Anderson-Metastasis Breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) and MDA-MB-231 resistant to paclitaxel (PAC) at 10 nM concentration (MDA-MB-231PAC10) were obtained from Professor Weiguang Wang’s research Group, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK. In detail, MDA-MB-231PAC10 was developed from MDA-MB-231 (purchased from ATCC, Middlesex, Teddington, UK) using a procedure reported previously [5]. Paclitaxel (+99.5%) was obtained from Alfa Aesar, Lancashire, UK. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), Gibco™ fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin streptomycin (Pen-Strep) antibiotic solution, non-essential amino acid solution and L-glutamine (cell culture tested, 99.0–101.0%), ethanol (absolute and 70%), 50 mL centrifuge tubes (sterile), tissue culture flask 75 cm2 (sterile) and serological pipettes (sterile) Gibco™ Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%), phenol red, sodium chloride (99.5%), potassium chloride, potassium phosphate and sodium phosphate were purchased from Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-Yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) and Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased form Glentham Life Science, Wiltshire, UK. Corning® 96 Well TC-treated microplates were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Solubility Studies

Aqueous solutions of SBE or HP (1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% w/w) were initially prepared using HPLC-grade water. An excess amount of DDC-Cu was added separately to 1 mL of the aforementioned solutions. The resulting mixtures were vortexed, sonicated at room temperature for 2 h, then agitated at 250 rpm for 3 days at room temperature using Stuart reciprocating shaker SSL2 (Cole-Parmer, Neots, UK). Subsequently, the mixtures were centrifuged (Thermo Scientific Heraeus PIC017) for 10 min at 13,000 rpm. The supernatants (0.5 mL) were transferred to Spin X centrifuge tube with cellulose acetate filter (0.45 µm) and centrifuged again for 10 min at 13,000 rpm. The filtrates were further diluted with HPLC-grade water, and UV absorbance was measured at 435 nm using a UV spectrophotometer (Evolution TM 220 series with INSIGHT TM software, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). The DDC-Cu concentration was finally calculated based on a linear equation from a standard calibration curve of DDC-Cu in DMSO. The LOD and LOQ for DDC-Cu, which were predicted from the calibration curve equation, were 0.06 mg/L and 0.188 mg/L, respectively. The %RSD of the repeatability test at 100 mg/L drug concentration was less than 1.0, whereas the %RSD of the ruggedness test for the same drug concentration is less than 2.0. Full validation of the analytical methods is added as supplementary materials (Table S1 and Figure S1). In addition, all results were confirmed using HPLC analysis according to our method described previously [1]. In Brief, UltiMate 3000 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) with Accucore C18 4.6 × 150 mm column with a 2.6 μm particle size (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) were used. The mobile phase comprised 90% HPLC-grade methanol and 10% HPLC-grade water. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min, and UV detection was performed at 275 and 435 nm with an injection volume of 20 μL.

2.2.2. Freeze-Drying

Samples (10 mL) of the above DDC-Cu cyclodextrin solutions (15% and 20% w/v) were frozen at −80 °C for 12 h then freeze-dried under negative pressure of 0.06 ± 0.01 using Lyotrap LTE freeze dryer (LTE Scientific Ltd, Oldham, UK) for 72 h. The samples (Table 1) were stored at room temperature for further studies.

2.2.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) Analysis

DSC analysis of DDC-Cu, SBE, HP and freeze-dried formulations was performed using a differential scanning calorimeter (214 Polyma, Netzsch, Selb, Germany). Samples were weighted and crimp-sealed in aluminium led pierced-pans. Tests were carried out under nitrogen gas flow (20 mL/min) over a temperature range of 0–300 °C and at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The thermograms were analysed using Proteus Analysis software (version 7.0.1).

2.2.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

TGA was carried out using TG 209 F3 Tarsus model (Netzsch, Selb, Germany) in order to determine the moisture content of freeze-dried samples. Samples (3–7 mg) were loaded on an open fused silica crucible suspended from a microbalance and heated dynamically from 25 to 110 °C at 10 °C/min heating rate. The samples were kept at 110 °C for 3 min then heated to 300 °C at 10 °C/min. The resulting data were analysed using Proteus Analysis software (version 6.1.0, Netzsch, Selb, Germany).

2.2.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Infrared spectra were obtained using Spectrum Nicolet iSF FTIR Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Loughborough, UK), supported with iDF ATR. Small amount of each sample was directly loaded into the instrument without any treatment. The analysed spectra showed the % transmittance of different samples versus the wavenumbers range of 4000 to 650 cm−1. The data were obtained by OMNIC 9 software and presented by Excel.

2.2.6. Drug Solution Stability Study

The stability of freshly prepared and reconstituted solutions listed on Table 1 was assessed over 28 days. For reconstituted solutions, the freeze-dried samples were redissolved in HPLC-grade water without any further shaking or stirring. Samples were stored at room temperature and at appropriate intervals (weekly), aliquots of 0.5 mL were filtered and tested by UV spectrophotometer as explained above. The stability of DDC-Cu in solutions were confirmed by HPLC analysis as described earlier.

2.2.7. Cytotoxicity Studies

The cytotoxic effect of SBE20 and HP20 freeze-dried formulations on breast cancer cells was assessed in vitro. Living cells, indicated by metabolic activity, were estimated using an MTT assay and presented as a percentage of the non-treated cells [19]. MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-231PAC10 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 10 × 103 cells for MDA-MB-231 and 5 × 103 cells for MDA-MB-231PAC10 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 IU/mL penicillin, 50 μg/mL streptomycin and 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids. Cells were incubated for 24 h (Heracell 150i CO2 incubator, Thermo Scientific, Loughborough, UK) at 37 °C with 5% CO2, then treated with full growth media containing reconstituted formulations. Blank CDs solutions were used as negative controls and DDC-Cu was used as a positive control. After 72 h, all wells were treated with a standard 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay as previously described [20]. The experiments were carried out in triplicate and the IC50 values were calculated.

2.2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical significance was measured using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and student’s t-tests as appropriate. All values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Values of p < 0.05 were regarded as significantly different.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Solubility Studies

The intrinsic solubility of DDC-Cu was below the limit of detection of both UV spectrometry (supplementary materials) and even HPLC methods (data not shown). Thus, the intrinsic solubility was predicted in water using DMSO as a co-solvent by adopting methods of prediction reported by Vithlani et al. [21]. Our results confirmed that DDC-Cu was practically insoluble in water as the predicted intrinsic solubility was 0.0007 mg/L (Figure S2).
The solubility of DDC-Cu in different concentrations of HP and SBE was explored; the higher the CD concentration, the higher the apparent solubility of DDC-Cu (Figure 2). The solubility of DDC-Cu had a polynomial relationship with the increasing concentrations of both types of CD.
According to Higuchi and Connors’ model, this type of relationship between CDs and DDC-Cu that deviates positively from linearity was Ap-type phase (Figure 2B) [22]. Ap-type phase was usually obtained when water soluble CDs, such as HP and SBE, were used, and indicated that drug solubility increased in a non-linear fashion with increasing CDs concentration. This positive deviation suggests that the employed CDs were proportionately more effective at higher concentrations [12]. This might also be explained by the superior drug–CD interaction compared to CD–CD interactions. Normally, the physicochemical properties of the guest molecule and the type of CD (the host) predominate the outcome of this competition between both interactions [23]. The prepared solutions were clear with different degree of yellow, but become dark brown or black at higher concentrations, hence, 50-fold dilutions were used for imaging (Figure 2C).
It is worth mentioning that the pH values for all CD solutions remained stable within the range of 5–7 throughout the study (Table S2). This might suggest the suitability of CD formulations for clinical applications.
As shown in Figure 2A, for both 20% w/w CD solutions, the solubility of DDC-Cu has reached approximately 4 mg /mL. This provides not only unprecedented concentration of DDC-Cu but also potentially stable freeze-dried formulations and stable solutions (tested for 28 days as shown below). Furthermore, this solubility value is appropriate for further investigation on anticancer activity of this ingredient. For example, the minimum limit of solubility to initiate pharmacokinetic studies on rats or mice is 2.0 mg/mL [24].

3.2. Physicochemical Characterisations Studies of Freeze-Dried Samples

3.2.1. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) Analysis

The thermograms of SBE, HP and DDC-Cu raw materials and SBE15, SBE20, HP15 and HP20 freeze dried formulations are shown in Figure 3. Free DDC-Cu had a sharp endothermic peak at 201 °C attributed to a melting temperature with relatively high enthalpy (ΔH) value (−80.65 J/g). Melting temperature and heat of fusion (enthalpy) of a material might be used to indicate crystallinity; the higher the crystallinity, the higher the melting temperature. Therefore, any drop in the melting point of a “guest” molecule might indicate a stronger interaction with the “host” (the macromolecule) [25,26]. Correspondingly, all freeze-dried formulations for both HP and SBE showed no endothermic peaks in the region of that shown by the free DDC-Cu crystals. This might be an indicator of the solid solution state of DDC-Cu included in the freeze-dried formulations. Experimentally, this could be easily noticed by the instant dissolution of the formulations in water producing solutions with development of a distinctive yellow colour at low concentrations (Figure 2C), and a very dark green colour at higher concentrations (not shown). The broad peaks around 100 °C shown by thermograms of freeze-dried formulations might be explained by the evaporation of residual moisture in these formulations.

3.2.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The thermal stability of the formulations compared to raw materials was further investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Figure 4 shows that pure DDC-Cu experienced three stages of weight loss: early stage of 40 to 100 °C, the weight loss was due to loss of surface adsorbed and hydrogen bond water. This stage is less noticeable for CD raw materials and formulations. No further significant decrease in weight is shown during the second stage for DDC-Cu (100–190 °C) and CD raw materials and formulations (100–260 °C). Starting at approximately 190 °C, the third stage for DDC-Cu involves a sharp loss of the total weight at 290 °C. This might be explained by the cleavage of chemical bonds between DDC and Cu2+, followed by the degradation of reactive DDC to diethylamine and carbon disulfide [26]. The third stage starts at two different points for CD formulations; at approximately 260 °C SBE formulations, while HP formulations are expected to start above 300 °C [27]. The difference between TGA profiles for both beta CDs, owning to different chemical structures, have already been reported in literature [27,28,29]. More importantly, SBE15 and SBE20 formulations showed more resistance to degradation than raw SBE, by around 15 °C between both points where a sharp drop in weight occurred (Figure 4A). This may be due to the fact that the interaction between DDC-Cu and SBE resulted in stronger complex formation, demanding more heat to break. Interestingly, the distinctive degradation peak of DDC-Cu is not shown by both CDs formulations, which might constitute an evidence of the protection provided by the CDs as a stabilising host for DDC-Cu [30].

3.2.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Figure 5 shows the FTIR spectra of the freeze-dried formulations of SBE and HP, pure DDC-Cu and pure CDs. The IR spectrum of DDC-Cu shows a strong absorption band at 1504 cm−1 corresponding to the C-N bond, which indicates its partial double bond nature. There was no difference between pure CDs spectra and the corresponding freeze-dried formulations, where none of DDC-Cu vibration bands stands significantly in the CD complexes. The disappearance of DDC-Cu vibration bands in the formulations might mainly be due to the fact that the formulation content of DDC-Cu was lower than the detection limit of our FT-IR kit. However, the restriction of bending and stretching vibration of guest molecules by the formation of inclusion complexes have also been reported [31].

3.3. Drug Solution Stability Studies

The rapid precipitation of DDC-Cu in the form of crystals is a main challenge during the preparation of any formulation incorporating this material. In addition, most of the previous attempts have failed to produce stable solutions of DDC-Cu that are potentially suitable for therapeutic administration. The stability of freshly prepared and reconstituted solutions was performed over 28 days to confirm that there was no precipitation, crystallisation or degradation of DDC-Cu. As shown by Figure 6, all solutions were stable for 28 days without any significant change (p > 0.05) on DDC-Cu concentration. Compared to other nanomedical formulations [10,32], no sign of precipitation nor crystallisation was shown. These results were not unexpected for CDs used successfully in pharmaceutical research as solubility enhancers of hydrophobic drugs/ingredients [33,34].

3.4. Cytotoxicity Studies

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive type of cancer due to the lack of molecular markers such as oestrogen receptors and progesterone receptors [35]. Furthermore, TNBC can develop chemoresistance after repetitive exposure to first line chemotherapy agents such as Paclitaxel (PAC), an anti-cancer drug [5,36,37,38]. This acquired chemoresistance then becomes the major challenge in chemotherapy. In this study, two types of TNBC cell lines: (1) MDA-MB-231, the sensitive and (2) MDA-MB-231PAC10, the resistant cell line were used to assess the cytotoxic effect of DDC-Cu and its formulations. In addition to its high resistance to PAC, MDA-MB-231PAC10 has been reported to be cross-resistant to drugs such as cisplatin, docetaxel and doxorubicin [5].
As shown in Figure 7, MDA-MB-231 cells were sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of PAC and DDC-Cu. However, MDA-MB-231PAC10 showed high resistant to PAC (IC50 >1000 nM) but completely terminated by DDC-Cu (p < 0.05) (Figure 7C). These results confirm that DDC-Cu had the ability to overcome chemoresistance of MDA-MB-231PAC10. Interestingly, Liu et al. (2013) have reported similar results but after applying disulfiram in combination with CuCl2 on both MDA-MB-231PAC10 [5]. This also supports our previous findings showing that the mechanism of action for the combined disulfiram and CuCl2 may not be limited to ROS and that DDC-Cu has a strong and prolonged anti-cancer activity (i.e., potential druggable anti-cancer candidate) [1].
The cytotoxic effect of inclusion complexes of DDC-Cu (HP20 and SBE20) was also assessed. As shown in Figure 8, HP20 and SBE20 elicited cytotoxic activity similar to that of free DDC-Cu, used as a positive control, on both cell lines. Furthermore, there were no significant differences amongst HP20 and SBE20, and DDC-Cu (p > 0.05), whereas empty CDs solutions had no cytotoxic activity on both cells. Despite the apparent differences in IC50 values between both CDs HP20 and SBE20, and both cell lines MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-231PAC10, our statistical analysis confirmed that there was no significant difference to report (p > 0.05) (Figure 8).

4. Conclusions

The use DDC-Cu as an anticancer drug has always been challenged by its poor aqueous solubility. In this work, we have shown that the solubility of DDC-Cu may be improved using CD inclusion complexes. The freeze-dried formulations were readily dissolved in water yielding DDC-Cu solutions of high stability for 28 days. The thermal characteristics of the freeze-dried formulations supported the formation of inclusion complexes with the DDC-Cu molecules interacting CD molecules in a solid solution form. The MTT cytotoxicity study showed a strong toxic effect of the freeze-dried formulations on both MDA-MB-231 (sensitive) and MDA-MB-231PAC10 (chemoresistant) breast cancer cell lines similar to that of free DDC-Cu. Our results report that cyclodextrin DDC-Cu complexes have a great potential for further anticancer applications, especially, in vivo studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/13/1/84/s1, Figure S1. Overlain UV spectra of DDC-Cu from 250 to 500 nm wavelengths, Figure S2. Solubilization of DDC-Cu in DMSO/water mixtures plotted against DMSO concentrations (%v/v), Table S1. Linearity, recovery, precision, repeatability and ruggedness studies of DDC-Cu, Table S2. pH vales of the CDs solutions and saturated DDC-Cu/CDs Solutions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.N. and W.W.; methodology, M.N., A.S.S., R.G.A. and M.K.; validation, M.N., A.S.S., M.K., M.W. and I.T.; formal analysis, M.N., A.S.S., I.T., A.E.; investigation A.S.S., M.K. and I.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N. and A.S.S.; writing—review and editing, I.T., A.E., M.K., R.G.A., M.W. and W.W.; supervision, M.N.; funding acquisition, A.E. and M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by NPRP grant (NPRP9-337-3-069) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The findings herein reflect the work, and are solely the responsibility, of the authors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are complemented by Supplementary Materials. Enquiries may be made to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tawari, P.E.; Wang, Z.; Najlah, M.; Tsang, C.W.; Kannappan, V.; Liu, P.; McConville, C.; He, B.; Armesilla, A.L.; Wang, W. The cytotoxic mechanisms of disulfiram and copper(ii) in cancer cells. Toxicol. Res. 2015, 4, 1439–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Li, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, C.; Wang, L.; Chen, Z.-S.; Cui, W. The combination of disulfiram and copper for cancer treatment. Drug Discov. Today 2020, 25, 1099–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Najlah, M.; Suliman, A.S.; Tolaymat, I.; Kurusamy, S.; Kannappan, V.; Elhissi, A.M.A.; Wang, W. Development of Injectable PEGylated Liposome Encapsulating Disulfiram for Colorectal Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Najlah, M.; Ahmed, Z.; Iqbal, M.; Wang, Z.; Tawari, P.; Wang, W.; McConville, C. Development and characterisation of disulfiram-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017, 112, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Liu, P.; Kumar, I.S.; Brown, S.; Kannappan, V.; Tawari, P.E.; Tang, J.Z.; Jiang, W.; Armesilla, A.L.; Darling, J.L.; Wang, W. Disulfiram targets cancer stem-like cells and reverses resistance and cross-resistance in acquired paclitaxel-resistant triple-negative breast cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 109, 1876–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yip, N.C.; Fombon, I.S.; Liu, P.; Brown, S.; Kannappan, V.; Armesilla, A.L.; Xu, B.; Cassidy, J.; Darling, J.L.; Wang, W. Disulfiram modulated ROS-MAPK and NFkappaB pathways and targeted breast cancer cells with cancer stem cell-like properties. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 104, 1564–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Johansson, B. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of disulfiram and its metabolites. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1992, 369, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, D.; Cui, Q.C.; Yang, H.; Dou, Q.P. Disulfiram, a clinically used anti-alcoholism drug and copper-binding agent, induces apoptotic cell death in breast cancer cultures and xenografts via inhibition of the proteasome activity. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 10425–10433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, P.; Wang, Z.; Brown, S.; Kannappan, V.; Tawari, P.E.; Jiang, W.; Irache, J.M.; Tang, J.Z.; Armesilla, A.L.; Darling, J.L.; et al. Liposome encapsulated Disulfiram inhibits NFκB pathway and targets breast cancer stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 7471–7485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, W.; Wang, Z. Method for Treating Pleuroperitoneal Membrane Cancers by Locally Injecting Disulfiram Preparation. U.S. Patent No. 10,828,271, 10 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Marengo, A.; Forciniti, S.; Dando, I.; Pozza, E.D.; Stella, B.; Tsapis, N.; Yagoubi, N.; Fanelli, G.; Fattal, E.; Heeschen, C.; et al. Pancreatic cancer stem cell proliferation is strongly inhibited by diethyldithiocarbamate-copper complex loaded into hyaluronic acid decorated liposomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 2019, 1863, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Jambhekar, S.S.; Breen, P. Cyclodextrins in pharmaceutical formulations I: Structure and physicochemical properties, formation of complexes, and types of complex. Drug Discov. Today 2016, 21, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pinho, E.; Grootveld, M.; Soares, G.; Henriques, M. Cyclodextrins as encapsulation agents for plant bioactive compounds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Loftsson, T.; Duchêne, D. Cyclodextrins and their pharmaceutical applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2007, 329, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Carneiro, S.B.; Duarte, F.I.C.; Heimfarth, L.; Quintans, J.S.S.; Quintans-Junior, L.J.; Junior, V.F.D.V.; de Lima, A.A.N. Cyclodextrin(-)Drug Inclusion Complexes: In Vivo and In Vitro Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gandhi, S.R.; Quintans, J.D.S.S.; Gandhi, G.R.; Araújo, A.A.D.S.; Júnior, L.J.Q. The use of cyclodextrin inclusion complexes to improve anticancer drug profiles: A systematic review. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 1069–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Stella, V.J.; He, Q. Cyclodextrins. Toxicol. Pathol. 2008, 36, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gould, S.; Scott, R.C. 2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HP-beta-CD): A toxicology review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2005, 43, 1451–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sasaki, T.; Tamaki, J.; Nishizawa, K.; Kojima, T.; Tanaka, R.; Moriya, R.; Sasaki, H.; Maruyama, H. Evaluation of cell viability and metabolic activity of a 3D cultured human epidermal model using a dynamic autoradiographic technique with a PET radiopharmaceutical. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Plumb, J.A.; Milroy, R.; Kaye, S.B. Effects of the pH dependence of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide-formazan absorption on chemosensitivity determined by a novel tetrazolium-based assay. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 4435–4440. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vithlani, S.; Sarraf, S.; Chaw, C.S. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of self-emulsifying formulations of Cinnarizine. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2012, 38, 1188–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Higuchi, K.T.; Connors, A. Phase Solubility Techniques. In Advanced Analytical Chemistry of Instrumentation. Reilley, C.N.J., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1965; Volume 4, pp. 117–212. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nicol, T.W.; Matubayasi, N.; Shimizu, S. Origin of non-linearity in phase solubility: Solubilisation by cyclodextrin beyond stoichiometric complexation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 15205–15217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gao, Y.; Gesenberg, C.; Zheng, W. Chapter 17-Oral Formulations for Preclinical Studies: Principle, Design, and Development Considerations. In Developing Solid Oral Dosage Forms, 2nd ed.; Qiu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, G.G.Z., Yu, L., Mantri, R.V., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 455–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Senapati, S.; Thakur, R.; Verma, S.P.; Duggal, S.; Mishra, D.P.; Das, P.; Shripathi, T.; Kumar, M.; Rana, D.; Maiti, P. Layered double hydroxides as effective carrier for anticancer drugs and tailoring of release rate through interlayer anions. J. Control. Release 2016, 224, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, Y.; Kong, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, X.; Gou, J.; Yin, T.; He, H.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, X. Doxorubicin intercalated copper diethyldithiocarbamate functionalized layered double hydroxide hybrid nanoparticles for targeted therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 897–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Han, D.; Han, Z.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y.; Xin, S.; Zhang, H.; Yu, Z. Solubility Enhancement of Myricetin by Inclusion Complexation with Heptakis-O-(2-Hydroxypropyl)-β-Cyclodextrin: A Joint Experimental and Theoretical Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Zhu, F.; Wang, L.; Liao, S.; Zhu, Y.; Luo, W.; Huang, X.; Jiao, F.; Chen, X. Co-assembly of exfoliated Mg/Al layered double hydroxides nanosheets with sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin for enantioseparation of racemic propranolol. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 162, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sambasevam, K.P.; Mohamad, S.; Sarih, N.M.; Ismail, N.A. Synthesis and Characterization of the Inclusion Complex of beta-cyclodextrin and Azomethine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 3671–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, J.; Guo, Y.; Zografi, G. The solid-state stability of amorphous quinapril in the presence of beta-cyclodextrins. J. Pharm. Sci. 2002, 91, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Z.; Deng, Y.; Sun, S.; Zhang, X. Preparation of hydrophobic drugs cyclodextrin complex by lyophilization monophase solution. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2006, 32, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wehbe, M.; Anantha, M.; Backstrom, I.; Leung, A.; Chen, K.; Malhotra, A.; Edwards, K.; Bally, M.B. Nanoscale Reaction Vessels Designed for Synthesis of Copper-Drug Complexes Suitable for Preclinical Development. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Popielec, A.; Loftsson, T. Effects of cyclodextrins on the chemical stability of drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 531, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jarvinen, K.; Jarvinen, T.; Thompson, D.O.; Stella, V.J. The effect of a modified beta-cyclodextrin, SBE4-beta-CD, on the aqueous stability and ocular absorption of pilocarpine. Curr. Eye Res. 1994, 13, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chavez, K.J.; Garimella, S.V.; Lipkowitz, S. Triple negative breast cancer cell lines: One tool in the search for better treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Breast Dis. 2010, 32, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Najlah, M.; Jain, M.; Wan, K.W.; Ahmed, W.; Alhnan, M.A.; Phoenix, D.A.; Taylor, K.M.G.; Elhissi, A. Ethanol-based proliposome delivery systems of paclitaxel for in vitro application against brain cancer cells. J. Liposome Res. 2018, 28, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Najlah, M.; Kadam, A.; Wan, K.W.; Ahmed, W.; Taylor, K.M.; Elhissi, A.M. Novel paclitaxel formulations solubilized by parenteral nutrition nanoemulsions for application against glioma cell lines. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 506, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Teow, H.M.; Zhou, Z.; Najlah, M.; Yusof, S.R.; Abbott, N.J.; D’Emanuele, A. Delivery of paclitaxel across cellular barriers using a dendrimer-based nanocarrier. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 441, 701–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g001 550
Figure 1. The formation of diethyldithiocarbamate copper II (DDC-Cu) as a result of disulfiram (DS) reaction with copper [3].
Figure 1. The formation of diethyldithiocarbamate copper II (DDC-Cu) as a result of disulfiram (DS) reaction with copper [3].
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g001
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Diethyldithiocarbamic acid (DDC)-Cu Solubility (mg/mL) in assorted CD solutions (mM), (B) Phase solubility diagrams of DDC-Cu/CD (mM) (Mean ± SD; n = 3), and (C) DDC-Cu saturated solutions in serial concentrations of sulfobutyl ether beta-cyclodextrin (SBE), (50-fold dilutions).
Figure 2. (A) Diethyldithiocarbamic acid (DDC)-Cu Solubility (mg/mL) in assorted CD solutions (mM), (B) Phase solubility diagrams of DDC-Cu/CD (mM) (Mean ± SD; n = 3), and (C) DDC-Cu saturated solutions in serial concentrations of sulfobutyl ether beta-cyclodextrin (SBE), (50-fold dilutions).
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g002
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g003 550
Figure 3. DSC thermographs of (A) SBE-CD freeze dried formulations, SBE-CD and DDC-Cu and (B) HP-CD freeze dried formulations, HP-CD and DDC-Cu.
Figure 3. DSC thermographs of (A) SBE-CD freeze dried formulations, SBE-CD and DDC-Cu and (B) HP-CD freeze dried formulations, HP-CD and DDC-Cu.
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g003
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g004 550
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) thermographs of (A) SBE-CD freeze dried formulations, SBE-CD and DDC-Cu and (B) HP-CD freeze dried formulations, HP-CD and DDC-Cu.
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) thermographs of (A) SBE-CD freeze dried formulations, SBE-CD and DDC-Cu and (B) HP-CD freeze dried formulations, HP-CD and DDC-Cu.
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g004
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g005 550
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of (A) SBE freeze dried formulations, SBE and DDC-Cu and (B) HP freeze dried formulations, HP and DDC-Cu.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of (A) SBE freeze dried formulations, SBE and DDC-Cu and (B) HP freeze dried formulations, HP and DDC-Cu.
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g005
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g006 550
Figure 6. Solution state stability studies of the freshly prepared (A) and reconstituted (B) DDC-Cu CD solutions. For both, the axes y represents the percentage remained of solubilized DDC-Cu in solution.
Figure 6. Solution state stability studies of the freshly prepared (A) and reconstituted (B) DDC-Cu CD solutions. For both, the axes y represents the percentage remained of solubilized DDC-Cu in solution.
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g006
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g007 550
Figure 7. Survival curves (MTT assay) of triple negative breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 (A) and MDA-MB-231PAC10 (B) with increasing concentrations of paclitaxel (PAC) and DDC-Cu (n = 3 ± SD). (C) The IC50 values of PAC and DDC-Cu on both breast cancer cell lines (n = 3 ± SD).
Figure 7. Survival curves (MTT assay) of triple negative breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 (A) and MDA-MB-231PAC10 (B) with increasing concentrations of paclitaxel (PAC) and DDC-Cu (n = 3 ± SD). (C) The IC50 values of PAC and DDC-Cu on both breast cancer cell lines (n = 3 ± SD).
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g007
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g008 550
Figure 8. Survival curves (MTT assay) of triple negative breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 (A) and MDA-MB-231PAC10 (B) after 72 h of exposure to increasing concentration of DDC-Cu formulations. (C) The IC50 values of DDC-Cu and formulations on both breast cancer cell lines (n = 3 ± SD).
Figure 8. Survival curves (MTT assay) of triple negative breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 (A) and MDA-MB-231PAC10 (B) after 72 h of exposure to increasing concentration of DDC-Cu formulations. (C) The IC50 values of DDC-Cu and formulations on both breast cancer cell lines (n = 3 ± SD).
Pharmaceutics 13 00084 g008
Table
Table 1. Cyclodextrin (CD) concentration and acronyms of the freeze-dried formulations.
Table 1. Cyclodextrin (CD) concentration and acronyms of the freeze-dried formulations.
Sample NameCD TypeCD Concentration (% w/w)DDC-Cu Concentration
mg/mL (Mean ± SD; n = 3)
SBE15SBE152.11± 0.03
SBE20SBE203.85± 0.09
HP15HP152.51 ± 0.06
HP20HP203.85 ± 0.07
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Said Suliman, A.; Khoder, M.; Tolaymat, I.; Webster, M.; Alany, R.G.; Wang, W.; Elhissi, A.; Najlah, M. Cyclodextrin Diethyldithiocarbamate Copper II Inclusion Complexes: A Promising Chemotherapeutic Delivery System against Chemoresistant Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Lines. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010084

AMA Style

Said Suliman A, Khoder M, Tolaymat I, Webster M, Alany RG, Wang W, Elhissi A, Najlah M. Cyclodextrin Diethyldithiocarbamate Copper II Inclusion Complexes: A Promising Chemotherapeutic Delivery System against Chemoresistant Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Lines. Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(1):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Said Suliman, Ammar, Mouhamad Khoder, Ibrahim Tolaymat, Matt Webster, Raid G. Alany, Weiguang Wang, Abdelbary Elhissi, and Mohammad Najlah. 2021. "Cyclodextrin Diethyldithiocarbamate Copper II Inclusion Complexes: A Promising Chemotherapeutic Delivery System against Chemoresistant Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Lines" Pharmaceutics 13, no. 1: 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop