Next Article in Journal
A Tailored Thermosensitive PLGA-PEG-PLGA/Emulsomes Composite for Enhanced Oxcarbazepine Brain Delivery via the Nasal Route
Next Article in Special Issue
SPC Liposomes as Possible Delivery Systems for Improving Bioavailability of the Natural Sesquiterpene β-Caryophyllene: Lamellarity and Drug-Loading as Key Features for a Rational Drug Delivery Design
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Dissolving Microneedle Arrays for Transdermal Absorption Enhancement of Human Parathyroid Hormone (1-34)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stealth and Cationic Nanoliposomes as Drug Delivery Systems to Increase Andrographolide BBB Permeability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Parvifloron D-Loaded Smart Nanoparticles to Target Pancreatic Cancer

1
Centro de Investigação em Biociências e Tecnologias da Saúde (CBIOS), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal
2
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Alcalá, Ctra. A2 km33,600 Campus Universitario, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
3
Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa (FFUL), Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
4
iMed.ULisboa-Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
5
Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment (LEPABE), Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
6
Centro de Química e Bioquímica (CQB), Centro de Química Estrutural (CQE), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
7
Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
8
Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering (IBEB), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2018, 10(4), 216; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10040216
Submission received: 21 September 2018 / Revised: 26 October 2018 / Accepted: 1 November 2018 / Published: 4 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Nanovesicles for Drug Targeting and Delivery)

Abstract

:
Pancreatic cancer is the eighth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. For this reason, the development of more effective therapies is a major concern for the scientific community. Accordingly, plants belonging to Plectranthus genus and their isolated compounds, such as Parvifloron D, were found to have cytotoxic and antiproliferative activities. However, Parvifloron D is a very low water-soluble compound. Thus, nanotechnology can be a promising delivery system to enhance drug solubility and targeted delivery. The extraction of Parvifloron D from P. ecklonii was optimized through an acetone ultrasound-assisted method and isolated by Flash-Dry Column Chromatography. Then, its antiproliferative effect was selectivity evaluated against different cell lines (IC50 of 0.15 ± 0.05 μM, 11.9 ± 0.7 μM, 21.6 ± 0.5, 34.3 ± 4.1 μM, 35.1 ± 2.2 μM and 32.1 ± 4.3 μM for BxPC3, PANC-1, Ins1-E, MCF-7, HaCat and Caco-2, respectively). To obtain an optimized stable Parvifloron D pharmaceutical dosage form, albumin nanoparticles were produced through a desolvation method (yield of encapsulation of 91.2%) and characterized in terms of size (165 nm; PI 0.11), zeta potential (−7.88 mV) and morphology. In conclusion, Parvifloron D can be efficiently obtained from P. ecklonii and it has shown selective cytotoxicity to pancreatic cell lines. Parvifloron D nanoencapsulation can be considered as a possible efficient alternative approach in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most deadly oncologic disease and it is estimated that it will be the second most common cause of death due to cancer in the United States (USA) in 2030 [1].
This type of cancer is difficult to diagnose early, and currently, the treatment options available are very limited, being surgical resection the only potentially curative treatment. Nevertheless, surgery may be not possible in 80−90% of the cases, and long-term survival after surgical resection is very low [2,3,4].
Chemotherapy has demonstrated a positive impact on overall survival when prescribed after surgery with curative intent, and may reduce the risk of recurrence [5]. Gemcitabine and erlotinib are some examples of approved drugs in use and nab-paclitaxel has been approved in the USA and in Europe for metastasis [6]. However, chemotherapy with classical therapeutic agents has many side effects, such as nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite, hair loss, ulcers nozzles and higher chance of infection, as it promotes a shortage of white blood cells. In order to improve the long-term survival and improve the quality of life of patients with pancreatic cancer, it is imperative to find new therapeutic agents.
The use of medicinal plants and their constituents has proved their potential as clinical alternatives to synthetized drugs, leading to the discovery of new bioactive compounds [7]. These compounds have generated a strong interest in pharmacological research, towards the development of new anticancer agents. In fact, more than 50% of the compounds with different mechanisms of action used in chemotherapy are extracted from plant materials [4,6].
Many Plectranthus species are used as plants with medicinal interest against a variety of diseases, such as cancer. Abietane diterpenoids have been reported as the main constituents of some species in this genus and are responsible for its potential therapeutic value [8]. These naturally occurring compounds display a vast array of biological activities including cytotoxic and antiproliferative activities against human tumor cells [8,9]. Diterpenoids containing an abietane skeleton have proven to be strongly cytotoxic against human leukemia cells [10].
Burmistrova et al. confirmed that Parvifloron D (Figure 1) has strong cytotoxic properties against several human tumor cell lines [8]. Parvifloron D was isolated from P. ecklonii and thus, this plant can be associated as a good source of this abietane diterpenoid. In addition, it was also found that Parvifloron D anti-proliferative effect is generally associated with an increase in the intracellular level of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) that seems to play a crucial role in the apoptotic process of cells [11].
Nanotechnology has the potentiality of controlling and manipulating matter at the nanoscale by designing and engineering new systems [4]. Advances in nanoscience and nanotechnology can transform what has been done until today since new strategies will enhance and upgrade solutions to the formulation problems raised [12]. Besides improving solubility and stability of active compounds, nanoparticles may extend a formulation’s action and successfully combine active substances with different degrees of hydrophilicity [12,13,14]. Its targeting abilities to deliver drugs directly to the affected organs and tissues are another advantage of these systems that can be used in medicine [12,15].
Nanocarriers can improve the efficiency of drugs by changing their body distribution, decreasing acute toxicity, increasing their dissolution rate and in vivo stability concerning the risk of earlier metabolism and degradation [12,14,16,17].
The present study focuses on the optimization of the extraction and isolation of Parvifloron D, given its cytotoxic potential. Therefore, new approaches to target pancreatic cancer cells will be performed to improve its selectivity. Moreover, the development of a novel diterpene-encapsulated nanosystem will be done in order to optimize the Parvifloron D stability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Plant material P. ecklonii Benth was given by the Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of Lisbon and it was collected from seeds provided by the herbarium of the National Botanical Garden of Kirstenbosch, South Africa. Voucher specimens (S/No. LISC) have been deposited in the herbarium of the Tropical Research Institute in Lisbon [8]. Acetone, hexane and ethyl acetate were supplied by VWR Chemicals (VWR international S.A.S., Briare, France); Silica was obtained from Merck (grade 60, 230–400 mesh, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany); Bovine serum albumin was purchased to Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Culture media and antibiotics were obtained from Invitrogen (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (LGC Standards S.L.U. Barcelona, Spain). Reagents for cell proliferation assays were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). All reagents used for the nanoparticles preparation were of analytical grade and purified water obtained by a Millipore system (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA).

2.2. Extraction and Isolation

2.2.1. Extraction

The whole plant-dried powdered P. ecklonii (197.55 g) was used to perform the Parvifloron D exhaustive extraction followed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) (hexane: ethyl acetate, 7:3 (v/v)). The ultrasound-assisted extraction was performed using the acetone (10 × 600 mL) as the extraction solvent. The extract was obtained (28.54 g) by filtration and evaporation of acetone under vacuum (<40 °C) [9].

2.2.2. Isolation

Repeated Flash-Dry Column Chromatography of P. ecklonii extract (25 g), over silica gel (Merck 9385, 75 g), using n-hexane: ethyl acetate mixtures of increasing polarity, allowed the isolation of pure Parvifloron D (0.882 g) [18]. The chemical structure of Parvifloron D was elucidated comparing the 1H-NMR spectroscopic data (Table S1: NMR data of PvD, (CDCl3, 1H 400 MHz, 13C 100 MHz; δ in ppm, J in Hz) and Table S2: Significant assignments observed on Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation (HMBC) experiment for Parvifloron D) which was almost identical to those in the literature [9,19].

2.3. Parvifloron D Quantification by HPLC-DAD Analysis

The High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) quantification of Parvifloron D from P. ecklonii extract was carried out as previously described [20]. It was used as a Liquid Chromatograph Agilent Technologies 1200 Infinity Series Liquid Chromatography (LC) System equipped with diode array detector (DAD), using a ChemStation Software (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and a LiChrospher, 100 RP-18 (5 mm) column from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Parvifloron D was determined and quantified by injecting 20 µL of the sample at 1 mg/mL, using a gradient composed of Solution A (methanol), Solution B (acetonitrile) and Solution D (0.3% trichloroacetic acid in water) as follows: 0 min, 15% A, 5% B and 80% D; 20 min, 80% A, 10% B and 10% D; 25 min, 80% A, 10% B and 10% D. The flow rate was set at 1 mL/min. The authentic sample of Parvifloron D was run under the same conditions in methanol, and the detection was carried out between 200 and 600 nm with a diode array detector (DAD). All analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.4. Cell Culture and Cytotoxicity Assays

In order to evaluate Parvifloron D selectivity and antiproliferative effects against human tumor cells, different cell lines were tested: three pancreatic (BxPC3, PANC-1 and Ins1-E) and three non-pancreatic (MCF-7, HaCat and Caco-2) cell lines.
All cell lines tested, BxPC3 (human pancreas adenocarcinoma), PANC-1 (human pancreas adenocarcinoma), Ins1-E (rat pancreas insulinoma), MCF-7 (human breast cancer), HaCat (human keratinocyte) and Caco-2 (colon adenocarcinoma), are typically adherent cell cultures. Evaluations were made in different conditions regarding the different types of cells. Thus, BxPC3 cells were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 medium with 10% heat-inactivated FBS; Ins1-E cells were maintained in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 IU/mL of penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and β-mercaptoethanol (50 µM) 1:1000; MCF-7, PANC-1 and HaCat cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with high-glucose (4500 mg/L), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 IU/mL of penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin; and Caco-2 cells were maintained in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 IU/mL of penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin all at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 incubator.
The effects of Parvifloron D on cell growth were evaluated by different assays, namely, for BxPC3 cells, the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay (colorimetric) was used [21] and for Ins1-E, MCF-7, PANC-1, HaCat and Caco-2 cells the MTT test was used [10]. Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well plates (using a cell concentration of 800 cells per well for BxPC3, 1 × 104 cell/mL per well for Ins1-E, MCF-7, PANC-1, HaCat and Caco-2) under normal conditions (5% CO2 humidified atmosphere at 37 °C) and allowed to adhere for 24 h. The cells were then incubated with Parvifloron D at different concentrations: between 0.5 and 25.0 µM for BxPC3 and to Ins1-E, MCF-7, PANC-1, HaCat and Caco-2 between 10.0 and 60.0 µM. Following this incubation period, and once the cells were analyzed through different assays, they were processed under different conditions. BxPC3 cells were fixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid for 1 h on ice, and washed and stained with 50 μL 0.4% SRB dye for 30 min. The cells were then washed repeatedly with 1% acetic acid to remove unbound dye. After, the cells were dried, and the protein-bound stain was solubilized with 10 mM Tris solution.
The SRB absorbance was measured at 560 nm using the microplate reader Model 680 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The concentration that inhibits cell survival in 50% (IC50) was determined using the SRB assay. The absorbance of the wells containing the drug and the absorbance of the wells containing untreated cells, following a 24 h incubation period, were subsequently compared with that of the wells containing the cells that had been fixed at time zero (when Parvifloron D was added). Similarly, Ins1-E, MCF-7, PANC-1, HaCat and Caco-2 cells medium was removed, and the wells were washed with Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS). Then, 50 µL of a 10% MTT solution was added to the cells and the plates were incubated for 4 h. After the incubation time, 100 µL of DMSO were added to each well to solubilize the formazan crystals formed during the incubation period.
The absorbance of all samples was again measured at 570 nm using the microplate reader and IC50 was determined.
The cytotoxic effect was evaluated by determining the percentage of viable/death cells for each Parvifloron D studied concentration. Based on these values, the IC50 (Parvifloron D concentration that induces a 50% inhibition of cell growth) was calculated, according to an equation proposed by Hills and co-workers [22]. For IC50 determination, two concentrations, X1 and X2, and the respective cell densities, Y1 and Y2, that correspond to higher or lesser than half cell density in negative control (Y0), were established, according to the following equation:
Log IC50 = Log X1 + {[(Y1 − (Y0)/2)]/(Y1Y2)} x (Log X2 − Log X1)
where, Y0/2 is the half-cell density of the negative control; Y1 is the cell density above Y0/2; X1 is the concentration corresponding to Y1; Y2 is the cell density below Y0/2; X2 is the concentration corresponding to Y2; The IC50 was determined by linear interpolation between X1 and X2.

2.5. Parvifloron D Solubility Assays

Parvifloron D solubility in PBS (pH 7.4, European Pharmacopoeia 7.0) was determined at two different temperatures, 25 °C and 37 °C, by measuring the amount of compound dissolved in a saturated solution (∼30 μg/mL) after 24 h, with constant stirring (200 rpm). Three independent measurements at each condition were conducted (n = 3) [23].

2.6. Parvifloron D Encapsulation into a Biocompatible and Hydrophilic Nanomaterial

In previous studies, Parvifloron D has showed low water-solubility, probably due to its long carbon chains and the presence of aromatic rings, giving Parvifloron D lipophilic characteristics [24,25], along with an apparent lack of selectivity to cancer cells [23]. Therefore, the encapsulation of Parvifloron D into a biocompatible and hydrophilic nanomaterial as a drug delivery system had the main objective of the achievement of optimized bioavailability and stability of the drug and thus, optimal drug loading and release properties, a long shelf life and higher therapeutic efficacy, with lower side effects [26].
Albumin was chosen as the encapsulating material to Parvifloron D due to its biocompatibility and affinity to the liver. The technology used to produce nanoparticles was the desolvation method, suitable to a wide range of polymers, especially heat-sensitives ones such as albumin, being the main advantage that it does not require an increase in temperature [27,28]. Briefly, bovine serum albumin was dissolved in purified distilled water with the pH adjusted to 8.2 with NaOH 0.1 M. Subsequently, Parvifloron D was dissolved in acetone and added to the albumin solution, which was added dropwise into a solution of absolute ethanol under magnetic stirring (500 rpm). After stirring, an opalescent suspension was spontaneously formed at room temperature. After this desolvation process, glucose in water (1.8%, v/v) was added to cross-link the desolvated albumin nanoparticles. The cross-linking process was performed under stirring of the colloidal suspension over a time period of 30 min. Measurement of pH was conducted with a pH electrode meter (827 pH lab Metrohm) calibrated daily with buffer solutions pH 4.00 ± 0.02 and 7.00 ± 0.02 (25 °C).

2.7. Determination of the Parvifloron D Encapsulation Efficiency by HPLC Analysis

Parvifloron D encapsulation efficiency (EE%) was determined using a reverse-phase HPLC chromatographic method (stationary phase—LiChrospher RP 18 (5 µm), Lichrocart 250–4.6) for the drug quantification at a detection wavelength of 254 nm. Briefly, a HPLC (Hitachi system LaCrom Elite, Column oven, Diode Array Detector (UV-Vis) (Hitachi High Technologies America, San Jose, CA, USA)) was used with a mobile phase comprising methanol and trichloroacetic acid 0.1% (80:20, v/v) (flow rate of 1.0 mL/min). Column conditions were maintained at 30 °C, with an injection volume of 20 μL and a run-time of 15 min. Measurements were carried out in duplicate and according to the described formula:
EE (%) = (Amount of encapsulated drug/Initial drug amount) × 100%

2.8. In Vitro Release Studies

After determining Parvifloron D solubility, to maintain sink conditions during the in vitro release studies, empty nanoparticles and Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles were freeze-dried (24 h at −50 ± 2 °C, Freezone 2.5 L Benchtop Freeze Dry System, Labconco, MO, USA) and weighted according to the drug solubility. As an approximation to the blood pH, each sample of weighted nanoparticles was placed in a glass recipient, containing 250 mL of PBS (pH 7.4, European Pharmacopoeia 7.0), under constant stirring (200 rpm), in order to simulate the in vivo conditions [23]. At appropriate time intervals, aliquots of the release medium were collected from three different points of the dissolution medium, in order to obtain a homogenous collection of the sample. Nanoparticles were isolated from the supernatant by centrifugation (20,000 rpm for 15 min). The Parvifloron D amount collected from the in vitro release medium, at each time point, was determined by HPLC (see Section 2.7). The assay was conducted for 72 h, to assure that all Parvifloron D was released. (n = 3, mean ± SD).

2.9. Physical and Morphological Characterization of the Nanoparticles: Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

Freshly prepared empty nanoparticles and Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles were studied in terms of their structure, surface morphology, shape and size by DLS, SEM and AFM.
Physical characterization of the nanoparticles was carried out by evaluation of mean particle size, polydispersity index (PI) and zeta potential by DLS and electrophoretic mobility (Coulter nano-sizer Delsa Nano™ (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA)) of the nanoparticles’ concentrated suspension (n = 3).
For SEM, the aqueous suspensions containing empty and loaded nanoparticles were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.2 (European Pharmacopoeia 7.0) during 1 h. After centrifugation, the pellets were washed three times in the fixative buffer. Then, aliquots (10 μL) of the two samples suspensions were scattered over a round glass coverslip previously coated with poly-L-lysine and left to dry in a desiccator. Subsequently, the material was coated with a thin layer of gold and observed on a JEOL 5200LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Images were recorded digitally.
AFM images were acquired on an atomic force microscope, Multimode 8 coupled to Nanoscope V Controller, from Bruker, UK, by using peak force tapping and ScanAssist mode. In order to offer a clean and flat surface for AFM analysis, an aliquot of each sample (~30 μL) was mounted on a freshly cleaved mica sheet and left to dry before being analyzed. The images were obtained in ambient conditions, at a sweep rate close to 1 Hz, using scanasyst-air 0.4 N/m tips, from Bruker.

2.10. Physicochemical Characterization of Nanoparticles Interaction Analysis by Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR)

To study the possible interactions between Parvifloron D and bovine serum albumin polymer of the developed nanoparticles, FT-IR spectroscopy was conducted on freeze-dried nanoparticles samples and on each isolated compound, using potassium bromide (KBr). The FT-IR spectra was recorded by using a Nicolet FT-IR Spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, Beverly, MA, USA) from 4000 to 400 cm−1, at a scanning speed of cm−1 for 256 scans by placing the KBr pellet on the attenuated total reflection objective. The final data is reported as a data average of 256 scans. The pellet was prepared in a ratio of 1:10 (w/w) of KBr to sample (nanoparticles or other component) and left to dry in a desiccator for 24 h before the analysis. The following samples were compared: empty nanoparticles (i.e., without Parvifloron D), Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles, physical mixture of Parvifloron D and bovine serum albumin (1:1, w/w), the polymer (bovine serum albumin), the cross-linking agent (glucose) and the drug (Parvifloron D).

2.11. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

In an attempt to check the purity of the drug and to confirm possible physicochemical interactions between nanoparticles and their raw components, thermal transformations and phase transitions of the nanoparticles were studied by calorimetry (Diferential Scanning Calorimetry, Q200, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) under a nitrogen gas flow of 50 mL/min (AirLiquide, Algés, Portugal). Samples (1–5 mg) were analyzed in hermetic aluminum pans at a heating rate of 10 °C /min from 40 to 400 °C. The endothermic and exothermic events were analyzed using TA-Universal Analysis software (Universal Analysis 2000 version 4.7A, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Extraction and Isolation

The diterpenoid Parvifloron D was isolated from a P. ecklonii extract in a total amount of 166.1 µg/mg, quantified by HPLC. This extraction yield of Parvifloron D with acetone was optimized when compared with Burmistrova et al. extraction (136.75 µg/mg) [8]. Here, the ultrasound-assisted extraction showed a higher extraction yield when compared with the previous described maceration method. The optimized isolation of Parvifloron D (882 mg, 0.45% on the dry plant) showed to be a successful isolation process which presented a higher yield of Parvifloron D in comparison with M Simões et al. results (0.27% on the dry plant) [9].
The isolated compound peak was verified by HPLC, as Figure 2 shows.

3.2. Parvifloron D Quantification by HPLC-DAD

The phytochemical analysis of P. ecklonii extract was performed by HPLC-DAD as represented in Figure 3. The presence of Parvifloron D was revealed (Retention Time (RT) = 27.63 min) as the principal constituent was obtained and its absorption spectra was performed, as previously described [29].

3.3. Cell culture and Cytotoxicity Assays

To study the cytotoxicity of free Parvifloron D, SRB and MTT assays were conducted. The results have shown that free Parvifloron D was more cytotoxic to pancreatic cell lines (BxPC3, PANC-1 and Ins1-E) than to non-pancreatic cell lines (MCF-7, Caco-2 and HaCat), displaying more selectivity to our target tumor cells than to others. Parvifloron D presented the lowest value of IC50 of 0.15 ± 0.05 μM for BxPC3 (human pancreatic tumor cells), and a high value of 32.1 ± 4.3 μM for Caco-2 cells (colon adenocarcinoma) according Table 1. Even in tumor cells, Parvifloron D had a higher selectivity to human tumor pancreatic cells. Cell viability in different time points, 24 h and 48 h, for Ins1-E, MCF7 and Caco-2 cells were measured and the results were added to supplementary material (Table S3—IC50 (µM) values in different time points, 24 h and 48 h, of different cell lines–cytotoxicity assays).
Considering some previously published results such as X. Yu et al. (IC50 = 0.2 μM to gemcitabine in BxPC3 cell line) [30], A. Singh et al. (IC50 = 123.9 μM to gemcitabine in PANC-1 cell line) [31], A. Acuna et al. (IC50 = 46.5 μM to PH-427 in BxPC3 cell line) [32], S. Mukai et al. (IC50 = 19.5 μM and 20.4 μM to gefitinib in BxPC3 and PANC-1 cell lines, respectively) [33], L. Wang et al. (IC50 = 39.86 μM and 83.76 μM to Pemetrexed in BxPC3 and PANC-1 cell lines, respectively) [34] or even A. Wright et al. (IC50 = 70.9 μM and 22.8 μM to Aphrocallistin in BxPC3 and PANC-1 cell lines, respectively) [35], we can suggest that Parvifloron D has a higher cytotoxic potential (IC50 = 0.15 ± 0.05) to these pancreatic tumor cells.
Despite these results and concerning the Parvifloron D mechanism of action, our group work is studding Parvifloron D-induced cell death and they have observed that Parvifloron D induces an increase in Sub-G1 and a reduction of G2/M populations in MDA-MB-231 (human breast tumor cells), as Burmistrova et al. already described in leukemia HL-60 and U-937 cells [8]. These results lead us to believe that Parvifloron D-induced cell death can be through this mechanism independently of the cell line tested. Although, this data is still in progress, and thus it has not been published yet. Nevertheless, our group has tested the internalization of polymeric nanoparticles with Parvifloron D, observing that it had occurred by endocytosis within 2 h [23]. Moreover, according to the literature, seven membrane-associated albumin-binding proteins have been discovered, namely: albondin/glycoprotein60 (gp60), glycoprotein18 (gp18), glycoprotein30 (gp30), the neonatal Fcreceptor (FcRn), heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), calreticulin, cubilin, and megalin [36]. This leads us to believe that our nanoparticles may internalize via endocytosis [37]. This assumption must be confirmed with future experiments of nanoparticles co-localization and nanoparticles cellular quantification.

3.4. Nanoparticles Encapsulation Efficiency by HPLC Analysis

In order to determine Parvifloron D encapsulation efficiency, a calibration curve was made using previously isolated Parvifloron D as a calibration standard. Parvifloron D standards ranging from 3 to 75 μg/mL were evaluated and a calibration curve (y = 7589.9x − 12798) was obtained with R2 = 0.999. Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) were calculated to be 2.6 μg/mL and 7.9 μg/mL, respectively.
Encapsulation efficiency (%) was determined by measuring the non-encapsulated drug. Non-encapsulated drug was measured (8.79 µg/mL) (i.e., indirect quantification) and the value obtained was subtracted from the amount of drug initially added, being the encapsulation efficiency value for Parvifloron D 91.2 ± 5.51% (mean value ± SD, n = 3).

3.5. Parvifloron D Solubility Assays and In Vitro Release Studies

HPLC studies were carried out to determine the solubility of Parvifloron D in PBS (pH 7.4) before performing in vitro release studies of Parvifloron D after entrapment into the albumin nanoparticles.
After 24h incubation in PBS pH 7.4, at two different temperatures, 25 °C and 37 °C, Parvifloron D solubility was 3.7 ± 0.8 μg/mL and 4.9 ± 0.3 μg/mL, respectively (n = 3).
Concerning the in vitro release studies, all entrapped Parvifloron D was released from albumin nanoparticles in 72 h in PBS at pH 7.4. As illustrated in Figure 4, after 24 h, approximately 40% of Parvifloron D was released from the nanoparticles and no burst release was observed. Besides, Parvifloron D degradation was evaluated as the in vitro release studies went by. The release profile was continually sustained over the assay and all of the drug was been released in less than 72 h.

3.6. Physical and Morphological Characterization of the Nanoparticles: DLS, AFM, SEM

In terms of mean size value, Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles were smaller than empty nanoparticles (165 nm (PI 0.11) and 250 nm (PI 0.37), respectively). This fact is probably due to electrostatic interactions, which may reduce and compact the particle structure. It should also be noted that there was a color change of nanoparticles from white to orange, when Parvifloron D was entrapped inside the particles. The pH value was around 8.5 in both formulations. Zeta potential was negative in both cases (−19.65 and −7.88 mV to empty nanoparticles and Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles, respectively) and the difference might be attributed to the presence of Parvifloron D, suggesting some interaction between the albumin and the drug, which can be related to the intrinsic charge of Parvifloron D (pKa values of 8.9, 9.9, calculated values by ChemDraw Professional).
AFM analysis has confirmed particles size. Figure 5 shows that the particle size of the prepared nanoparticles was approximately 210 nm and 190 nm for empty and Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles, respectively, as measured by DLS. AFM can offer a significant contribution to understand surface and interface properties, thus allowing for the optimization of biomaterials performance, processes, and physical and chemical properties even at the nanoscale [38]. In addition, we can notice that particles, especially the empty nanoparticles, were monodispersed. Figure 6 shows the 3D images highlighting the shape and morphology of the prepared nanoparticles.
In the current study, SEM observations showed that nanoparticles in both formulations had a uniform distribution and exhibited a spherical shape with a smooth surface. It is also clearly seen that the particles size is different, the empty nanoparticles being slightly larger than the Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles (Figure 7). Here, SEM provides information on surface topography, size, and size distribution of nanoparticles [39].

3.7. Physicochemical Characterization of Nanoparticles Interaction Analysis by FT-IR

FT-IR spectra main peaks and the corresponding functional groups were identified for all tested samples. For physical mixtures and nanoparticles, the peaks were identified based on the functional groups of the raw components (wavenumbers: 4000–400 cm−1), as it is shown in Table 2. This analysis has demonstrated to be a useful method to interpret intra- and inter-material interactions in raw materials and their combination to obtain nanoparticles.
After the analysis of the spectra, it was confirmed the bovine serum albumin structure by the presence of specific bands for amides (I and II). Also, Parvifloron D analysis showed its specific bands, confirming its structure previously done by NMR (supplementary material). When albumin empty nanoparticles were analyzed, the same specific bands were identified in the raw bovine serum albumin spectra, although the N–H amide II band has shifted, suggesting some structure modification of bovine serum albumin chains when aggregated to provide nanoparticles. In addition, a new band at 3000 cm−1 appears in empty nanoparticles, probably due to the cross-linking with glucose. As for the interactions between drug and nanoparticles, it was possible to differentiate the spectra of albumin nanoparticles loaded with Parvifloron D and the physical mixture of bovine serum albumin and free Parvifloron D (at 1:1, w/w). This fact can indicate that the drug was successfully entrapped inside the nanoparticles, and observing the distinct peaks in the nanostructures analysis, some kind of drug–albumin interaction during nanoparticles formation might have occurred.

3.8. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Differential scanning calorimetry was used to characterize the different properties of the developed nanosystems, such as Parvifloron D polymorphism, interactions between drug and nanoparticles and the effect on their thermal events, compared to raw materials. Figure 8 shows an exothermic peak near to 170 °C, indicating a crystallization and an endothermic peak close to 300 °C, which can represent a crystal melting, suggesting that Parvifloron D is a polymorphic drug. Anyway, to better understand the thermal behavior of Parvifloron D, more crystallographic studies have to be conducted in the future. Bovine serum albumin endothermic peaks were observed around 215 °C while exothermic peaks appeared around 310 °C. Analyzing albumin at nanoparticles form, its spectra changed, showing a lower melting point, once the endothermic peak appeared near to 190 °C, suggesting some structure modification of albumin chains to organize nanoparticles arrangement. For albumin nanoparticles loaded with Parvifloron D, the spectra show two endothermic peaks which probably represents both bovine serum albumin and Parvifloron D melting points, but due to some rearrangement between these raw materials into nanoparticles, these endothermic events had occurred at lower temperatures (136 °C and 219 °C).

4. Conclusions

Parvifloron D has been efficiently extracted and isolated from P. ecklonii. Cell cultures have shown that Parvifloron D may have more selectivity to human pancreatic tumor cells than healthy cells or breast cancer cells. Parvifloron D-loaded small and spherical nanoparticles (water soluble particles) have been formulated with high encapsulation efficiency. Those nanoparticles led to a controlled release of the drug encapsulation over 72 h. Parvifloron D nanoparticles were stable, and therefore, they can be considered a suitable and promising carrier to deliver the drug to the tumor site, improving the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/10/4/216/s1, Table S1: NMR data of PvD, (CDCl3, 1H 400 MHz, 13C 100 MHz; δ in ppm, J in Hz); Table S2: Significant assignments observed on HMBC experiment for PvD and Table S3: IC50 (µM) values in different time points, 24 h and 48 h, of different cell lines—cytotoxicity assays.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.S.-R. and C.P.R.; methodology and formal analysis: A.S.-R., C.G., C.E., A.B., S.C.C., M.A.N.C., J.M., A.S.V., L.A., J.F.P., M.M.G., P.R. and C.P.R.; investigation: A.S.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.-R.; writing, review and editing: C.P.R., J.M., J.F.P., A.S.V., M.M.G. and L.A.; supervision, C.P.R., P.R. and J.M.; project administration: A.S.-R. and C.P.R.; funding acquisition: ULHT/CBIOS and UAH.

Funding

In this research, phytochemical section was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) under the reference UID/DTP/04567/2016 and SEM analysis was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) with financial support to CESAM (UID/AMB/50017), through FCT/MEC National funds, and the co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to P. Fonte for kindly donating the Ins1-E cell line used in this paper, and to A. S. Fernandes and N. Saraiva (CBIOS/ULHT) for sharing their unpublished results, allowing us to better discuss the mechanism of action of Parvifloron D. The authors would also like to thank to M. Minas da Piedade and C. Bernardes for their help in FT-IR analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rahib, L.; Smith, B.D.; Aizenberg, R.; Rosenzweig, A.B.; Fleshman, J.M.; Matrisian, L.M. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the united states. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 2913–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Niess, H.; Kleespies, A.; Andrassy, J.; Pratschke, S.; Angele, M.K.; Guba, M.; Jauch, K.-W.; Bruns, C.J. Pancreatic cancer in the elderly: Guidelines and individualized therapy. Der Chir. 2013, 84, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oberstein, P.E.; Olive, K.P. Pancreatic cancer: Why is it so hard to treat? Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2013, 6, 321–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rebelo, A.; Molpeceres, J.; Rijo, P.; Reis, C.P. Pancreatic Cancer Therapy Review: From Classic Therapeutic Agents to Modern Nanotechnologies. Curr. Drug Metab. 2017, 18, 346–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Neoptolemos, J.P.; Stocken, D.D.; Friess, H.; Bassi, C.; Dunn, J.A.; Hickey, H.; Beger, H.; Fernandez-Cruz, L.; Dervenis, C.; Lacaine, F.; et al. A Randomized Trial of Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 1200–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gourav, L.; Deepak-K., S.; Pawan-K., S.; Chand, M.P. Anticancer, antimicrobial and antifertility activities of some medicinal plants: A review. Med. Drug Res. 2015, 3, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nicolai, M.; Pereira, P.; Vitor, R.F.; Pinto, C.; Roberto, A.; Rijo, P. Antioxidant activity and rosmarinic acid content of ultrasound-assisted ethanolic extracts of medicinal plants. Measurement 2016, 89, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Burmistrova, O.; Perdomo, J.; Simões, M.F.; Rijo, P.; Quintana, J.; Estévez, F. The abietane diterpenoid parvifloron D from Plectranthus ecklonii is a potent apoptotic inducer in human leukemia cells. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Simões, M.F.; Rijo, P.; Duarte, A.; Matias, D.; Rodríguez, B. An easy and stereoselective rearrangement of an abietane diterpenoid into a bioactive microstegiol derivative. Phytochem. Lett. 2010, 3, 234–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Burmistrova, O.; Simões, M.F.; Rijo, P.; Quintana, J.; Bermejo, J.; Estévez, F. Antiproliferative activity of abietane diterpenoids against human tumor cells. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1413–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rosa, S.; Correia, V.; Ribeiro, I.; Rijo, P.; Saraiva, N.; Fernandes, A. In vitro antioxidant properties of the diterpenes Parvifloron D and 7α-acetoxy-6β-hydroxyroyleanone. Biomed. Biopharm. Res. 2015, 12, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bonifácio, B.V.; Silva, P.B.; Aparecido dos Santos Ramos, M.; Maria Silveira Negri, K.; Maria Bauab, T.; Chorilli, M. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems and herbal medicines: A review. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Reis, C.P.; Figueiredo, I.V.; Carvalho, R.A.; Jones, J.; Nunes, P.; Soares, A.F.; Silva, C.F.; Ribeiro, A.J.; Veiga, F.J.; Damgé, C.; et al. Toxicological assessment of orally delivered nanoparticulate insulin. Nanotoxicology 2008, 2, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kouchakzadeh, H.; Shojaosadati, S.A.; Maghsoudi, A.; Farahani, E.V. Optimization of PEGylation Conditions for BSA Nanoparticles Using Response Surface Methodology. AAPS PharmSciTech 2010, 11, 1206–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Abrantes, G.; Duarte, D.; Reis, C.P. An Overview of Pharmaceutical Excipients: Safe or Not Safe? J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105, 2019–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Reis, C.P.; Damgé, C. Nanotechnology as a promising strategy for alternative routes of insulin delivery. Methods Enzymol. 2012, 508, 271–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pinto Reis, C.; Silva, C.; Martinho, N.; Rosado, C. Drug carriers for oral delivery of peptides and proteins: Accomplishments and future perspectives. Ther. Deliv. 2013, 4, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Harwood, L. “Dry-Column” Flash Chromatography. Aldrichim. Acta 1985, 18, 25. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gaspar-Marques, C.; Simões, M.F.; Valdeira, M.L.; Rodríguez, B. Terpenoids and phenolics from Plectranthus strigosus, bioactivity screening. Nat. Prod. Res. 2008, 22, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rijo, P.; Falé, P.L.; Serralheiro, M.L.; Simões, M.F.; Gomes, A.; Reis, C. Optimization of medicinal plant extraction methods and their encapsulation through extrusion technology. Measurement 2014, 58, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coelho, S.C.; Almeida, G.M.; Santos-Silva, F.; Pereira, M.C.; Coelho, M.A.N. Enhancing the efficiency of bortezomib conjugated to pegylated gold nanoparticles: An in vitro study on human pancreatic cancer cells and adenocarcinoma human lung alveolar basal epithelial cells. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2016, 13, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hills, M.; Hudson, C.; Smith, P.G. Global monitoring of the resistance of malarial parasites to drugs: Statistical treatment of micro-test data. In Working Paper No. 2.8. 5 for the Informal Consultation on the Epidemiology of Drug Resistance of Malaria Parasites; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  23. Silva, C.O.; Molpeceres, J.; Batanero, B.; Fernandes, A.S.; Saraiva, N.; Costa, J.G.; Rijo, P.; Figueiredo, I.V.; Faísca, P.; Reis, C.P. Functionalized diterpene parvifloron D-loaded hybrid nanoparticles for targeted delivery in melanoma therapy. Ther. Deliv. 2016, 7, 521–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Smith, R.; Tanford, C. Hydrophobicity of Long Chain n-Alkyl Carboxylic Acids, as Measured by Their Distribution Between Heptane and Aqueous Solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1973, 70, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Silva, P.J. Inductive and resonance effects on the acidities of phenol, enols, and carbonyl α-hydrogens. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 914–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bilia, A.R.; Piazzini, V.; Guccione, C.; Risaliti, L.; Asprea, M.; Capecchi, G.; Bergonzi, M.C. Improving on Nature: The Role of Nanomedicine in the Development of Clinical Natural Drugs. Planta Med. 2017, 83, 366–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Pinto Reis, C.; Neufeld, R.J.; Ribeiro, A.J.; Veiga, F. Nanoencapsulation I. Methods for preparation of drug-loaded polymeric nanoparticles. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2006, 2, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Weber, C.; Coester, C.; Kreuter, J.; Langer, K. Desolvation process and surface characterisation of protein nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm. 2000, 194, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Figueiredo, N.L.; Falé, P.L.; Madeira, P.J.A.; Florêncio, M.H.; Ascensão, L.; Serralheiro, M.L.M.; Lino, A.R.L. Phytochemical Analysis of Plectranthus sp. Extracts and Application in Inhibition of Dental Bacteria, Streptococcus sobrinus and Streptococcus mutans. Eur. J. Med. Plants 2014, 4, 794–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, X.; Di, Y.; Xie, C.; Song, Y.; He, H.; Li, H.; Pu, X.; Lu, W.; Fu, D.; Jin, C. An in vitro and in vivo study of gemcitabine-loaded albumin nanoparticles in a pancreatic cancer cell line. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 6825–6834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Singh, A.; Xu, J.; Mattheolabakis, G.; Amiji, M. EGFR-targeted gelatin nanoparticles for systemic administration of gemcitabine in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer model. Nanomed. NBM 2015, 12, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Acuna, A.; Jeffery, J.J.; Abril, E.R.; Nagle, R.B.; Guzman, R.; Pagel, M.D.; Meuillet, E.J. Nanoparticle delivery of an AKT/PDK1 inhibitor improves the therapeutic effect in pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 5653–5665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mukai, S.; Moriya, S.; Hiramoto, M.; Kazama, H.; Kokuba, H.; Che, X.F.; Yokoyama, T.; Sakamoto, S.; Sugawara, A.; Sunazuka, T.; et al. Macrolides sensitize EGFR-TKI-induced non-apoptotic cell death via blocking autophagy flux in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 48, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, L.I.N.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, W. Schedule-dependent cytotoxic synergism of pemetrexed and erlotinib in BXPC-3 and PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 2011, 2, 969–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wright, A.E.; Roth, G.P.; Hoffman, J.K.; Divlianska, D.B.; Pechter, D.; Sennett, S.H.; Guzmán, E.A.; Linley, P.; McCarthy, P.J.; Pitts, T.P.; et al. Isolation, synthesis, and biological activity of aphrocallistin, an adenine-substituted bromotyramine metabolite from the hexactinellida sponge Aphrocallistes beatrix. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 1178–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Merlot, A.M.; Kalinowski, D.S.; Richardson, D.R. Unraveling the mysteries of serum albumin—More than just a serum protein. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yameen, B.; Choi, W.I.; Vilos, C.; Swami, A.; Shi, J.; Farokhzad, O.C. Insight into nanoparticle cellular uptake and intracellular targeting. J. Control. Release 2015, 28, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Marrese, M.; Guarino, V.; Ambrosio, L. Atomic Force Microscopy: A Powerful Tool to Address Scaffold Design in Tissue Engineering. J. Funct. Biomater. 2017, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kowoll, T.; Müller, E.; Fritsch-Decker, S.; Hettler, S.; Störmer, H.; Weiss, C.; Gerthsen, D. Contrast of backscattered electron SEM images of nanoparticles on substrates with complex structure. Scanning 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Molecular structure form Parvifloron D.
Figure 1. Molecular structure form Parvifloron D.
Pharmaceutics 10 00216 g001
Figure 2. Isolated Parvifloron D spectra by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis.
Figure 2. Isolated Parvifloron D spectra by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis.
Pharmaceutics 10 00216 g002
Figure 3. HPLC profile of P. ecklonii extract (254 nm): (1) Parvifloron D peak and absorption spectra.
Figure 3. HPLC profile of P. ecklonii extract (254 nm): (1) Parvifloron D peak and absorption spectra.
Pharmaceutics 10 00216 g003
Figure 4. In vitro drug release of Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles at 0.05 mg/mL, for 72 h, in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 solution. Results are expressed as mean of measurements of three independent nanoparticles lots ± Standard Deviation (SD) (n = 3).
Figure 4. In vitro drug release of Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles at 0.05 mg/mL, for 72 h, in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 solution. Results are expressed as mean of measurements of three independent nanoparticles lots ± Standard Deviation (SD) (n = 3).
Pharmaceutics 10 00216 g004
Figure 5. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) sectorial analysis of: (A) Albumin empty nanoparticles and (B) Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles. Particle sizes of 210 nm and 190 nm are also represented, for A and B, respectively.
Figure 5. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) sectorial analysis of: (A) Albumin empty nanoparticles and (B) Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles. Particle sizes of 210 nm and 190 nm are also represented, for A and B, respectively.
Pharmaceutics 10 00216 g005
Figure 6. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) analysis 3D images of: (A) Albumin empty nanoparticles and (B) Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles.
Figure 6. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) analysis 3D images of: (A) Albumin empty nanoparticles and (B) Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles.
Pharmaceutics 10 00216 g006
Figure 7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrographs of: (A) Albumin empty nanoparticles (scale bar: 1 μm) and (B) Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles (scale bar: 1 μm).
Figure 7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrographs of: (A) Albumin empty nanoparticles (scale bar: 1 μm) and (B) Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles (scale bar: 1 μm).
Pharmaceutics 10 00216 g007
Figure 8. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) thermal transformations in free Parvifloron D, bovine serum albumin polymer, albumin empty nanoparticles and Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles, respectively. The major peak temperatures (°C) and the difference in Gibbs energy (J/g), for each sample, are also represented.
Figure 8. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) thermal transformations in free Parvifloron D, bovine serum albumin polymer, albumin empty nanoparticles and Parvifloron D-loaded nanoparticles, respectively. The major peak temperatures (°C) and the difference in Gibbs energy (J/g), for each sample, are also represented.
Pharmaceutics 10 00216 g008
Table 1. IC50 (± Standard deviation (SD)) values of different cell lines—cytotoxicity assays.
Table 1. IC50 (± Standard deviation (SD)) values of different cell lines—cytotoxicity assays.
Cell lineIC50 (µM) ± SD
MCF-7
(breast cancer)
35.1 ± 2.2
HaCat
(human keratinocyte)
34.3 ± 4.1
Caco-2
(Colon adenocarcinoma)
32.1 ± 4.3
INS-1E
(rat pancreatic insulinoma)
21.6 ± 0.5
BxPC3
(human pancreatic adenocarcinoma)
0.15 ± 0.1
PANC-1
(human pancreatic adenocarcinoma)
11.9 ± 0.7
Table 2. FT-IR analysis of spectra of all tested samples (cm−1).
Table 2. FT-IR analysis of spectra of all tested samples (cm−1).
Functional GroupsO–H
Carboxylic Acid (Stretching)
C–H
Alkane (Stretching)
C=O
Carbonyl (Stretching)
C=O
Amide I (Stretching)
N–H
Amide II (Bending)
C=C
Aromatic (Stretching)
C–H
Alkane (Bending)
C–O
Alcohol (Stretching)
=C–H
Alkene (Bending)
Compound
BSA 1---------16541590------------
PvD 2---28711693------1510------850
Glucose3350---------------14561032---
Physical mixture BSA + PvD---28711690165815901515---------
Empty BSA-NPs 33000------16541540------------
BSA-NPs loaded With PvD30002873---165415401540------910
1 BSA: Bovine serum albumin; 2 PvD: Parvifloron D; 3 NPs: nanoparticles.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos-Rebelo, A.; Garcia, C.; Eleutério, C.; Bastos, A.; Castro Coelho, S.; Coelho, M.A.N.; Molpeceres, J.; S. Viana, A.; Ascensão, L.; Pinto, J.F.; et al. Development of Parvifloron D-Loaded Smart Nanoparticles to Target Pancreatic Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10040216

AMA Style

Santos-Rebelo A, Garcia C, Eleutério C, Bastos A, Castro Coelho S, Coelho MAN, Molpeceres J, S. Viana A, Ascensão L, Pinto JF, et al. Development of Parvifloron D-Loaded Smart Nanoparticles to Target Pancreatic Cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2018; 10(4):216. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10040216

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos-Rebelo, Ana, Catarina Garcia, Carla Eleutério, Ana Bastos, Sílvia Castro Coelho, Manuel A. N. Coelho, Jesús Molpeceres, Ana S. Viana, Lia Ascensão, João F. Pinto, and et al. 2018. "Development of Parvifloron D-Loaded Smart Nanoparticles to Target Pancreatic Cancer" Pharmaceutics 10, no. 4: 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10040216

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop