Next Article in Journal
On the Fundamentals of Reverse Ring Rolling: A Numerical Proof of Concept
Previous Article in Journal
A State of the Art on Cryogenic Cooling and Its Applications in the Machining of Difficult-to-Machine Alloys
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microstructural Characterization and Corrosion Behavior of Similar and Dissimilar Welded Advanced High-Strength Steels (AHSS) by Rotary Friction Welding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High-Depth-to-Width-Ratio Horizontal NG-GMAW Joint for S500Q Steel

1
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
2
Harbin Electric Machinery Company Limited, Harbin 150001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(9), 2056; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092056
Submission received: 27 March 2024 / Revised: 18 April 2024 / Accepted: 23 April 2024 / Published: 27 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Welding of Materials)

Abstract

:
A novel high depth-to-width ratio of 15:1 narrow-gap gas metal arc welding technique was developed for the welding of S500Q steel in a horizontal butt joint. The bead arrangement of the I groove was optimized to produce a high-quality connection with the upper sidewall of the joint. The microstructure and mechanical properties were observed and evaluated by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, tensile testing, and micro-hardness and impact toughness testing at 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, and 4/5 thickness of the joint. The 3/5 T position exhibited the highest strength, which was attributed to the presence of finer carbide precipitates. The highest micro-hardness appeared at 4/5 T. The highest impact toughness appeared at 3/5 T. The formation of coarse granular bainite was the major reason for the decrease in impact toughness in other regions. A microscopic fracture at 1/5 T and 3/5 T was further analyzed. It was observed that the width of the fibrous zone at 3/5 T was significantly larger than that at 1/5 T. The radial zones at 1/5 T were observed to exhibit cleavage, with secondary cracks on the fracture surface.

1. Introduction

A pumped storage power station can freely choose the direction of energy conversion. It can flexibly select operating conditions, referring to the demand of the power grid, and has functions of peak shaving, valley shaving, frequency regulation, emergency reserve, and optimal power supply, which have been vigorously developed and widely used.
The stay ring is an important part of a pumped storage unit [1]. The stay ring requires high-strength and ultra-thick welded structural steel materials. S500Q is a 500 MPa grade low-alloy, high-strength steel developed in China, which is widely used in hydropower equipment [2]. As the units increase in capacity, the stay ring experiences an increase in thickness. Narrow-gap gas metal arc welding (NG-GMAW) is an advanced, highly efficient technology for joining thick-section metals. NG-GMAW has the advantages of energy saving, material saving, high efficiency, and a low welding heat input, stress deformation, thermal damage, etc. [3,4]. Common defects, such as a lack of fusion at groove sidewalls and porosity in weld joints, are still hard to avoid, especially for joining thick-section metals. Researchers studied the formation characteristics of welds and the influence of the oscillation width and sidewall dwell time on the formation process of narrow-gap welding [5,6,7]. The basic principle of the oscillating arc is to use the oscillation of the entire welding torch, the bending of the welding wire, the bending of the contact, the alternating magnetic fields, and other methods to make the arc oscillate back and forth on both sides of the groove to ensure sidewall fusion [8,9,10,11]. Liu and Fang designed a narrow-gap gas-shielded three-wired indirect arc welding torch, which greatly improved welding efficiency [12,13,14]. After the narrow-gap three-wired indirect arc, a tungsten electrode arc was used to make the convex deformation of the weld surface concave. Researchers studied the technology of planar position laser arc composite welding [15,16,17,18]. For narrow-gap welding, the optimization of welding process parameters, the oscillating arc, rotating arc, multi-wire welding, composite welding, and other specific methods have been studied to greatly optimize the weld formation and improve welding efficiency [19,20,21].
In stay ring welding, as depicted in Figure 1, which is difficult to turn over, it is necessary to adopt a horizontal welding position. In the horizontal-position welding process, the key problem is weld defects induced by the downward motion of the molten metal and poor weld formation [22,23]. Guo showed that the rotating arc process could be beneficial for the molten pool control of narrow-gap horizontal welding [24]. Cui controlled the horizontal weld formation of a molten pool by reducing the heat input and changing the effect of arc force and droplet impact on the molten pool [25]. However, the efficiency is greatly reduced. The rotating arc welding process must be carried out under the precise control of a small current (200–220 A) and the position of the welding torch. Otherwise, a slight deviation may lead to the instability of the welding process and even cause a huge disaster [26,27]. The multi-layer double-pass welding process has low position-accuracy requirements, good adaptability to groove size tolerance and thermal shrinkage during the welding process, a relatively wide selection range of welding parameters, a reduced production cost and operational complexity, and considerable advantages in practical applications.
However, the existing research studies are focused on the technical realization of thick-plate connections and the microstructure of specific locations, including the base metal (BM), weld metal (WM), and heat-affected zone (HAZ). There are few studies on narrow-gap welding for a high-depth-to-width-ratio horizontal NG-GMAW of more than 200 mm thickness. No attention has been paid to the microstructural inhomogeneity of the weld joint along the thickness direction and its influence on the properties of the weld joint. This paper aims to study the formation of inhomogeneous microstructures and analyze the effect of mechanical properties on the welding performance of S500Q steel with a 225 mm thickness. It is expected that the findings will contribute to promoting a better understanding of the microstructure development and mechanical properties of the NG-GMAW ultra-thick plates of the stay ring.

2. Materials and Methods

The dimensions of the welded specimen were 500 mm × 300 mm × 225 mm. The narrow-gap welding assembly dimensions were 500 mm × 614 mm × 225 mm, with an approximate bevel surface angle of 1°, as shown in Figure 2. The groove of the welded specimen was type I, with a 14–16 mm gap and a depth-to-width ratio of 15:1. The BM was S500Q steel, which exhibited a high strength and toughness [28]. S500Q is a European standard material grade, which specifies the mechanical properties and chemical composition of steel plates below 150 mm thickness in EN10025-6:2004 [29]. In order to match the requirement for thick plates above 200 mm of the stay ring, this paper applied the S500Q steel developed in China. The S500Q steel was manufactured by Nan Yang Han Ye Special Steel Co., Ltd., Nanyang, China. Table 1 presents its mechanical properties, and Table 2 displays its chemical composition [30]. According to EN10025-6:2004, S500Q steel evaluates the impact toughness at −20 °C without special requirements. Due to the power station being located in the northeast of China and the ambient temperature being lower than −20 °C, the impact toughness at −40 °C was studied in this paper.
AWS ER90S-G wire with a diameter of 1.2 mm was used as the welding wire. Table 3 and Table 4 present its chemical composition and mechanical properties, respectively. As shown in Figure 3, the welding system was composed of an NG-GMAW torch and a Fronius (TransPuls Synergic-500i, Fronius, Pettenbach, Austria) welding power supply equipped with a Fanuc M-20iA robot (Fanuc, Yamanashi, Japan). The bead arrangement is illustrated in Figure 4. The arrangement of two welding paths per layer was adopted, and the upper weld path was supported by the lower weld path.
In narrow-gap horizontal welding, the filler wires of the upper weld path and lower weld path were fixed at an angle and did not swing. When the distance between the wire and the sidewall was greater than 2.5 mm, it was easy to produce a lack of fusion, as shown in Figure 5. When the distance between the wire and the upper sidewall was smaller than 1.5 mm, it caused the molten pool to roll and flow, as shown in Figure 6.
Thus, the distance from 1.5 to 2.5 mm was used in this study to promote a high quality of high-depth-to-width-ratio horizontal NG-GMAW for S500Q steel, and the detailed parameters were as shown in Table 5.
According to ISO 4136-2022 [31], the tensile specimens were prepared at room temperature (20 °C). The layout of the tensile specimens is shown in Figure 7a. In the WM, there were 16 through-thickness cross-weld tensile specimens marked as CW1–16. Specimens CW1 and CW9 were located 15 mm from the top surface. The dimensions of the tensile testing specimens are shown in Figure 7b.
The experiments were conducted at four different points along the thickness direction of the joint: 1/5T, 2/5T, 3/5T, and 4/5 T, as shown in Figure 8a. Standard impact specimens with dimensions of 10 mm × 10 mm × 55 mm were prepared to evaluate the Charpy V-notched impact toughness at −40 °C. The impact testing was performed according to ISO 9016-2022 [32]. The bending test at room temperature (20 °C) was performed according to ISO 5173-2023 [33]. The layout of the specimens for bending and impacting is shown in Figure 8b. The dimensions of the bending specimens are shown in Figure 8c. The values of tensile strength, bending, and impact toughness were obtained from the average of three repeated tests.
Metallographic specimens with dimensions of 20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm were taken at corresponding positions. After grinding and polishing, the microstructure was etched with a 4% nitrate alcohol solution. The microstructures and the fracture morphology of the specimens were observed by optical microscopy (OM, ZEISS Observer A1m, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, HITACHI S-3700N, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The hardness distribution along the cross-section of the weld joint from the low BM to the top BM was measured at 1/5 T, 2/5 T, 3/5 T, and 4/5 T. The hardness distribution of the weld center at corresponding positions was compared. The hardness test was measured by a Vickers micro-hardness machine with a test load of 500 g and a dwell period of 15 s.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Tensile and Micro-Hardness Testing

Figure 9 presents the tensile properties along the thickness using cross-weld tensile specimens. All specimens fractured at the HAZ, indicating that the welding joint has high strength-matching characteristics. The results showed that the tensile strength of all parts of the weld joint was above 595 MPa. The strength decreased at 1/5 T, then increased at 2/5 T and 3/5 T, and then dropped at 4/5 T. The tensile strength at 3/5 T was about 615 MPa, greater than other positions.
Figure 10 shows the hardness distribution along the cross-section of the weld joint. The HAZ had a higher hardness value than the WM, and the BM presented the lowest hardness. Notably, in the HAZ, there existed significantly higher hardness values, with an average reading of 318.8 HV0.5, indicating hardening phenomena occurring in this region. And the results showed that the hardness of the HAZ was increased by 38% compared with the BM. In addition, the average hardness of the WM was 293.6 HV0.5, which was 27.1% higher than that of the BM. The hardness of the upper WM was higher than the lower WM because of the lower heat input.
Figure 11 shows the micro-hardness of the WM at 1/5 T, 2/5 T, 3/5 T, and 4/5 T. Overall, the micro-hardness had the highest values at 4/5 T, compared with those at 1/5 T, 2/5 T, and 3/5 T. In addition, with the increase in thickness from 1/5 T to 2/5 T, the micro-hardness slightly decreased, while from 2/5 T to 4/5 T, the micro-hardness significantly increased from 285 HV0.5 to 307 HV0.5.

3.2. Bend and Impact Testing

At room temperature (20 °C), a bending test was performed on S500Q steel weld joints with a bending center diameter of 80 mm and a bending angle of 180°. As shown in Figure 12a,b, there were no microcracks observed in both the weld zone and the HAZ, indicating an excellent plastic deformation capacity and fusion quality throughout the entire weld joint.
Figure 13 shows the impact toughness of the WM at different positions. Overall, the impact-absorbed energy had the highest values at 3/5 T, compared with those at 1/5, 2/5 and 4/5 T. In addition, with the decreasing thickness, the impact-absorbed energy slightly increased from 4/5 T to 3/5 T and then decreased from 3/5 T to 1/5 T. Also, at a testing temperature of −40 °C, the impact-absorbed energy of the WM dropped from 88 J at 3/5 T to 35.3 J at 1/5 T, which was a 59.9% decrease, indicating that the impact toughness was sensitive to the position of the thickness.

3.3. Microstructure and Fractography Analysis

The macroscopic morphology of the narrow-gap GMAW weld joint of S500Q steel is illustrated in Figure 14. The fusion line had a good fusion quality with the top and the low sidewalls. Each layer of the lower path had a width of about 9.4 mm and a thickness of about 6.8 mm, while the upper path had a width of about 7.4 mm and a thickness of about 6.2 mm. The size of the lower path was larger than that of the upper path. The darker-colored area represents the HAZ, resulting from thermal cycling during the welding process, with its width about 1.7 mm. It can also be seen from Figure 14 that the fusion line with the low sidewall was more optically distinct. This could be attributed to the wider hardened area, due to a higher heat input during the welding process.
Figure 15 shows the OM microstructure analysis of the weld joint. Figure 15a shows the BM, fine-grained zone, coarse-grained zone, fusion line, and WM in sequence. Figure 15b shows that the microstructure of the WM was composed of granular bainite, tempered soxhlet, and a small amount of upper bainite. Figure 15c shows that the microstructure of the BM was primarily composed of granular bainite, along with small amounts of massive ferrite and sorbite. The inter-crystalline δ-ferrite near the fusion line was heated and coarsened, which resulted in the formation of the HAZ, as shown in Figure 15d. The microstructure of the HAZ was composed of a fine-grained zone and coarse-grained zone. The WM uniformly transitioned to the coarse-grained zone, where the grain boundary was fine and the grain was not obviously coarsened. The coarse-grained zone uniformly transitioned to the fine-grained zone, which was a completely recrystallized zone. The grains in the completely recrystallized zone were uniform and fine. A coarse-grained transition zone between the fine-grained zone and the BM was an incompletely recrystallized zone, and the structure was a mixture of granular bainite and soxhlet, with some tretenite precipitates at the grain boundary. The precipitation was due to the different cooling rates. The tristenite would precipitate along the original austenite grain boundary with a slow cooling rate during the welding process. Figure 15d shows that martensitic structures were evident near the fusion line. Acicular ferrite was predominantly interspersed with minor reticulation in the WM, and the composition was formed by the combination of semi-reticulated first eutectic ferrites and bainite. Acicular ferrites formed nuclei and grew in crystals, and the grain size was refined, thereby improving the toughness of the WM and HAZ.
Figure 16 presents the OM and SEM images of the weld joint specimens at various positions. As presented in Figure 16a,e,i, the microstructure of the WM at 4/5 T consisted of a few dendritic crystal zones (DCZs), characterized by granular bainite and acicular ferrite. The larger carbides were precipitated in the WM and HAZ along the grain boundaries. In Figure 16b,f,j, the microstructure of the WM at 3/5 T consisted of a few columnar crystal zones (CCZs), characterized by granular bainite, acicular ferrite, and a little pro-eutectoid ferrite, which could be explained by the thermal gradient and the cooling rate. A large number of fine and dispersed granular carbides were precipitated in the grained region. In Figure 16c,g,k, the microstructure of the WM at 2/5 T consisted of a few CCZs, characterized by granular bainite, acicular ferrite, and more pro-eutectoid ferrite. The larger carbides were precipitated in the WM. Martensite–austenite constituents were precipitated at the ferritic grain boundary in the HAZ. In Figure 16d,h,l, the microstructure of the WM at 1/5 T consisted of a few DCZs, characterized by granular bainite, acicular ferrite, and a little pro-eutectoid ferrite. At 4/5 T and 1/5 T, the heat dissipation after welding existed as body heat dissipation and surface heat dissipation. At 3/5 T and 2/5 T, it was mainly based on body heat dissipation, and the direction of the thermal gradient was more obvious, where CCZs were represented.
In summary, during the welding process of NG-GMAW with low heat input, the cooling rate at the 4/5 T position was correspondingly fast, so a granular bainite structure was formed [34,35]. The hardness at 4/5 T was greater, with a large number of carbides, which was consistent with the micro-hardness results shown in Figure 11. With the increase in the thickness at 3/5 T, the cooling rate decreased. The carbide was dissolved during heating, and then dispersed and precipitated during the cooling process. The fine granular carbides pierced and hindered the movement of the dislocations. Fine granular carbides promoted the nucleation and growth of acicular ferrite, thereby improving the toughness of the joint [36,37]. It was consistent with the impact toughness results shown in Figure 13. There were a large number of dispersed carbide phases at 2/5 T and 3/5 T playing a dispersion-strengthening role, and the tensile strength of the weld increased. It was consistent with the tensile strength results shown in Figure 9. When the thickness of the joint continued to increase, close to the welding surface, the cooling rate increased, and the carbides were reduced. Coarse granular bainite reduced the toughness at 1/5 T.
A energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was further utilized to analyze the microstructure at various positions. Figure 17 shows the EDS mapping of the materials at various positions. From Figure 17a–d, it is clear that the elemental distribution, Fe, Mn, Ni, was uniform. The four positions exhibited numerous carbides, but the density of the carbides at 3/5 T was substantially lower than that at 1/5 T, 2/5 T, and 4/5 T, as shown in Figure 17b,f. And the carbides at 3/5 T were more diffuse. The characteristics were more obvious along the grain boundaries at 1/5 T, 2/5 T, and 4/5 T. The type of carbide was mainly Fe3C [28,38].
A microscopic fracture of 1/5 T and 3/5 T was further analyzed. Figure 18 displays the impact fracture morphologies of the WM and HAZ at 1/5 T and 3/5 T. The fracture surface exhibited fibrous zones, radial zones, and shear lips, as shown in Figure 18 a–d. In the WM, as shown in Figure 18a,e,i, the fibrous regions at 3/5 T contained more deep and big dimples. The fibrous zones at 1/5 T displayed shallow and small dimples, along with cleavage facets on the fibrous zone, as shown in Figure 18d,h,l. In the HAZ, as shown in Figure 18b,f,j, the fibrous regions at 3/5 T contained more deep and big dimples. The fibrous zones at 1/5 T displayed shallow and small dimples, along with cleavage facets on the fibrous zones, as shown in Figure 18c,g,k. The presence of large and deep dimples indicated that more energy would be consumed for deformation. The fibrous zones at 3/5 T accounted for 21.9% of the WM and 26.4% of the HAZ. The fibrous zones at 1/5 T accounted for 14.8% of the WM and 10.6% of the HAZ. It was observed that the width of the fibrous zone at 3/5 T was significantly larger than that at 1/5 T. Wider fiber zones are less prone to destabilize fractures in the material. This means that the higher the proportion of the fibrous zone, the better the impact toughness of the material. It was considered that the change in fibrous zone areas and fracture mode could be attributed to the presence of different microstructures and precipitations. A higher impact toughness was observed in the presence of a fine carbide distribution and acicular ferrite microstructure.
In this study, the radial zones at 1/5T were observed to exhibit cleavage, with secondary cracks on the fracture surface, indicative of a brittle fracture mode. However, the radial zone at 3/5 T was found to display a ductile fracture with dimples and an absence of secondary cracks on the fracture surface.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the microstructure and mechanical properties of a high-depth-to-width-ratio horizontal NG-GMAW joint, through the entire thickness of S500Q steel, were studied. The main conclusions are as follows:
Compared with the 1/5 T, 2/5 T and 4/5 T positions, the 3/5 T position had the highest strength, with a tensile strength reaching about 615 MPa. This was attributed to the formation of finer carbide precipitates.
At −40 °C, the impact toughness of the WM decreased by 59.9% from 88 J at 3/5 T to 35.3 J at 1/5 T, indicating that the impact toughness is sensitive to the thickness position. The microstructure at 3/5 T was mainly granular bainite, acicular ferrite, and fine dispersed granular carbides. The microstructure at 1/5 T was mainly coarse granular bainite, acicular ferrite, and a little pro-eutectoid ferrite. The coarse granular bainite was the essential reason for the decrease in impact energy.
The fibrous zone of the impact fracture at 3/5 T showed a ductile fracture. The radiation zone at 1/5 T showed a combination of a brittle fracture and a ductile fracture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L.; methodology, F.W.; software, H.L.; validation, R.J., Y.Z. and W.D.; formal analysis, R.J.; investigation, Y.Z.; resources, R.J.; data curation, R.J.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.; writing—review and editing, R.J. and K.Z.; visualization, Z.L.; supervision, H.L.; project administration, F.W.; funding acquisition, F.W. and W.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Heilongjiang Province key research and development plan (China), grant number GA21A401, and the Heilongjiang Science Foundation project (China), grant number LH2021E024.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Fangkai Wei, Yufei Zhou, Weizan Duan and Kuiliang Zhang were employed by the company Harbin Electric Machinery Company Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

NG-GMAWnarrow-gap gas metal arc welding
GMAWgas metal arc welding
SEMscanning electron microscopy
WMweld metal
HAZheat-affected zone
BMbase metal
OMoptical microscopy
DCZsdendritic crystal zones
CCZsducolumnar crystal zones
EDSenergy-dispersive spectrometer
CWcross-weld tensile specimen
1/5T1/5 thickness from weld surface
2/5T2/5 thickness from weld surface
3/5T3/5 thickness from weld surface
4/5 T4/5 thickness from weld surface
M-Amartensite-austenite constituents

References

  1. He, Q.; Huang, X.; Yang, M.; Yang, H.; Bi, H.; Wang, Z. Fluid–Structure coupling analysis of the stationary structures of a prototype pump turbine during load rejection. Energies 2022, 15, 3764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, H.; Jin, Y.H.; Jiang, Y.P. S550Q/S500Q weld ability of high strength steel analyses. Orient. Mot. 2011, 5, 60–62. [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu, G.Q.; Tang, X.H.; Han, S.Y.; Cui, H.C. Influence of interwire distance and arc length on welding process and defect formation mechanism in double-wire pulsed narrow-gap gas metal arc welding. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2022, 30, 7622–7635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qin, G.L. Development and application of narrow gap gas shielded welding process. Metal Work. (Hot Work.) 2022, 9, 8–20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, H.S.; Xue, R.L.; Zhou, G.P.; Bao, Y.; Li, X. Implementation of a two-stage algorithm for NG-GMAW seam tracking and oscillation width adaptation in pipeline welding. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2023, 28, 992–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Han, S.Y.; Liu, G.Q.; Tang, X.H.; Xu, L.; Cui, H.; Shao, C. Effect of molten pool behaviors on welding defects in tandem NG-GMAW based on CFD simulation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2022, 195, 123165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, G.; Jiang, Y. Numerical analysis modeling of temperature field in swing-arc narrow gap GMA welding with additional wire. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 125, 1559–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, W.J.; Xiao, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhu, P. Influence factors and control methods of droplet transfer in narrow gap P-GMAW overhead welding position. Trans. China Weld. Inst. 2024, 45, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  9. Qin, X.M.; Yao, S.; Xiang, F.; Sun, F. Welding wire bending mechanism based on PC control. Weld. Technol. 2002, 31, 35–36. [Google Scholar]
  10. Xu, G.X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, J.Y.; Li, L.; Zheng, Z.Q. Numerical analysis model for fluid flow in swing arc narrow gap vertical FCAW. J. Mech. Eng. 2019, 55, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  11. Traidia, A.; Roger, F.; Schroeder, J.; Guyot, E.; Marlaud, T. On the effects of gravity and sulfur content on the weld shape in horizontal narrow gap GTAW of stainless steels. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2013, 213, 1128–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, L.M.; Hu, C.H.; Fang, D.S. Forming characteristics of narrow gap gas shielded three wire indirect arc welding. Trans. China Weld. Inst. 2018, 39, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, L.M.; Wang, Z.L.; Zhang, T.Y.; Ba, X. Analysis of metal transfer and weld forming characteristics in triple-wire gas indirect arc welding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 120, 6777–6788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fang, D.S.; Liu, L.M. The droplet passing through the arc welding between three wires with gas body protection is analyzed. Weld. Technol. 2016, 45, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shelyagin, V.; Khaskin, V.; Bernatskyi, A.; Siora, A.; Sydorets, V.N.; Chinakhov, D.A. Multi-pass laser and hybrid laser-arc narrow-gap welding of steel butt joints. Mater. Sci. Forum 2018, 927, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wahba, M.; Mizutani, M.; Katayama, S. Single pass hybrid laser-arc welding of 25 mm thick square groove butt joints. Mater. Des. 2016, 97, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, J.; Cai, C.; Xie, J.; Huang, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H. Weld formation, arc behavior, and droplet transfer in narrow-gap laser-arc hybrid welding of titanium alloy. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 91, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meng, Y.F.; Li, G.; Gao, M.; Zhang, C.; Zeng, X. Formation and suppression mechanism of lack of fusion in narrow gap laser-arc hybrid welding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 100, 2299–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, X.Y.; Chen, H.; Li, M.V.; Bu, H.; Zhu, Z.; Cai, C. Porosity suppressing and grain refining of narrow-gap rotating laser-MIG hybrid welding of 5A06 aluminum alloy. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 68, 1100–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luo, Z.Y.; Han, S.G.; Chen, Y.C.; Cai, D.T.; Haskin, V. Effect of process parameters on the forming and tensile properties of laser-arc composite weld. Mater. Rev. 2019, 33, 5. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bao, Y.; Xue, R.; Zhou, J.; Xu, Y. Effect of increasing oscillation width on the arc characteristics and droplet transfer behavior of X80 steel in the overhead welding position of narrow gap P-GMAW. Metals 2023, 13, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, W.H.; Lin, S.B.; Fan, C.L.; Zhuo, X.Q.; Yang, C.L. Statistical modeling of weld bead geometry in oscillating arc narrow gap all-position GMA welding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 72, 1705–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shen, X.F.; Li, L.; Guo, W.; Teng, W.; He, W. Comparison of processing window and porosity distribution in laser welding of 10 mm thick 30CrMnSiA ultrahigh strength between flat (1G) and horizontal (2G) positions. J. Laser Appl. 2016, 28, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bahrami, A.; Aidun, D.; Valentine, D. Interaction of gravity forces in spot GTA weld pool. Weld. J. 2014, 93, 139–144. [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo, N.; Wang, M.; Guo, W.; Yu, J.; Feng, J. Study on forming mechanism of appearance defects in rotating arc narrow gap horizontal GMAW. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 75, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cui, H.C.; Jiang, Z.D.; Tang, X.H.; Lu, F.G. Research on narrow-gap GMAW with swing arc system in horizontal position. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 74, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elmesalamy, A. Narrow Gap Laser Welding of 316L Stainless Steel for Potential Application in the Manufacture of Thick Section Nuclear Components. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global A&I: The Sciences and Engineering Collection. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  28. Qian, X.; Ye, X.; Hou, X.; Wang, F.; Li, S.; Yu, Z.; Yang, S.; Huang, C.; Cui, J.; Zhu, C. Effect of 580 °C (20 h) heat treatment on mechanical properties of 25Cr2NiMo1V rotor-welded joints of oscillating arc (MAG) narrow gap thick steel. Materials 2021, 14, 4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. EN 10025-6-2004; Hot Rolled Products of Structural Steels—Part 6: Technical Delivery Conditions for Flat Products of High Yield Strength Structural Steels in the Quenched and Tempered Condition. European Standards s.r.o.: Plzeň-město, Czech Republic, 2004.
  30. Kang, W.; Tang, Z.; Xu, S.; Zhu, S. Method for Quenched and Tempered Extra Thick Steel for Hydropower Station. China Patent CN105349902, 24 February 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. ISO 4136-2022; Destructive Tests on Welds in Metallic Materials—Transverse Tensile Test. British Standards Institution: London, UK, 2022.
  32. ISO 9016-2022; Destructive Tests on Welds in Metallic Materials—Impact Tests—Test Specimen Location, Notch Orientation and Examination. British Standards Institution: London, UK, 2022.
  33. ISO 5173-2023; Destructive Tests on Welds in Metallic Materials—Bend Tests. British Standards Institution: London, UK, 2023.
  34. Ba, L.Z.; Wang, D.P.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, S.M.; Li, L. Effect of welding heat input on toughness of different alloys weld metal in ocean engineering steel. Trans. China Weld. Inst. 2020, 41, 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.F.; Zhang, F.J.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, X. Ultra-narrow gap fused electrode gas shielded automatic welding of DILLIMAX690E steel. J. Weld. 2012, 33, 81–84. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wu, S.W.; Zhang, C.J.; Zhu, L.G.; Zhang, F.; Guo, J. In-depth analysis of intra-granular acicular ferrite three-dimensional morphology. Scr. Mater. 2020, 185, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shao, Y.; Liu, C.X.; Yan, Z.S.; Li, H.; Liu, Y. Formation mechanism and control methods of acicular ferrite in HSLA steels: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2018, 34, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, K.; Li, J.; Wu, S.; Ge, G.; Huo, Y.; Hou, S.; Liu, Y. Effect of cross section on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 950 MPa grade heavy steel plate for hydropower. J. Materi. Eng. Perform 2023, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The stay ring in the horizontal welding position.
Figure 1. The stay ring in the horizontal welding position.
Materials 17 02056 g001
Figure 2. Groove size of high-depth-to-width-ratio horizontal NG-GMAW (mm).
Figure 2. Groove size of high-depth-to-width-ratio horizontal NG-GMAW (mm).
Materials 17 02056 g002
Figure 3. The welding system used in a horizontal joint.
Figure 3. The welding system used in a horizontal joint.
Materials 17 02056 g003
Figure 4. The bead arrangement and electric arc position characteristics.
Figure 4. The bead arrangement and electric arc position characteristics.
Materials 17 02056 g004
Figure 5. Appearance of a melt pool lack of fusion.
Figure 5. Appearance of a melt pool lack of fusion.
Materials 17 02056 g005
Figure 6. The molten pool rolled.
Figure 6. The molten pool rolled.
Materials 17 02056 g006
Figure 7. The tensile specimens: (a) positions; (b) dimensions (unit: mm).
Figure 7. The tensile specimens: (a) positions; (b) dimensions (unit: mm).
Materials 17 02056 g007
Figure 8. Four different points along the thickness: (a) positions of 1/5 T, 2/5 T, 3/5 T and 4/5 T; (b) the positions of the bending test and the impacting test specimens; (c) the dimensions of the bending specimen (unit: mm).
Figure 8. Four different points along the thickness: (a) positions of 1/5 T, 2/5 T, 3/5 T and 4/5 T; (b) the positions of the bending test and the impacting test specimens; (c) the dimensions of the bending specimen (unit: mm).
Materials 17 02056 g008
Figure 9. Through-thickness tensile properties of the welding joint.
Figure 9. Through-thickness tensile properties of the welding joint.
Materials 17 02056 g009
Figure 10. The hardness distribution along the cross-section of the weld joint from low sidewall to top sidewall.
Figure 10. The hardness distribution along the cross-section of the weld joint from low sidewall to top sidewall.
Materials 17 02056 g010
Figure 11. The hardness distribution along the cross-section of the WM.
Figure 11. The hardness distribution along the cross-section of the WM.
Materials 17 02056 g011
Figure 12. Bending test specimens of weld joint: (a) bending angle; (b) bending surface.
Figure 12. Bending test specimens of weld joint: (a) bending angle; (b) bending surface.
Materials 17 02056 g012
Figure 13. Low-temperature toughness test results of S500Q steel.
Figure 13. Low-temperature toughness test results of S500Q steel.
Materials 17 02056 g013
Figure 14. Cross-section macrograph of weld joint.
Figure 14. Cross-section macrograph of weld joint.
Materials 17 02056 g014
Figure 15. Cross-section macrograph of weld joint: (a) microstructure of HAZ; (b) microstructure of WM; (c) microstructure of BM; (d) microstructure of fusion line.
Figure 15. Cross-section macrograph of weld joint: (a) microstructure of HAZ; (b) microstructure of WM; (c) microstructure of BM; (d) microstructure of fusion line.
Materials 17 02056 g015
Figure 16. The OM and SEM at various positions of the WM: (ad) OM; (eh) SEM of WM; (il) SEM of HAZ; (a,e,i) 4/5 T, (b,f,j) 3/5 T, (c,g,k) 2/5 T, (d,h,l) 1/5 T.
Figure 16. The OM and SEM at various positions of the WM: (ad) OM; (eh) SEM of WM; (il) SEM of HAZ; (a,e,i) 4/5 T, (b,f,j) 3/5 T, (c,g,k) 2/5 T, (d,h,l) 1/5 T.
Materials 17 02056 g016
Figure 17. EDS-mapping analyses: (a,e) 4/5 T, (b,f) 3/5 T, (c,g) 2/5 T, (d,h) 1/5 T.
Figure 17. EDS-mapping analyses: (a,e) 4/5 T, (b,f) 3/5 T, (c,g) 2/5 T, (d,h) 1/5 T.
Materials 17 02056 g017
Figure 18. SEM micrographs of the −40 °C impact fracture: (a,e,i) 3/5 T WM; (b,f,j) 3/5 T HAZ; (c,g,k) 1/5 T HAZ; (d,h,l) 1/5 T WM.
Figure 18. SEM micrographs of the −40 °C impact fracture: (a,e,i) 3/5 T WM; (b,f,j) 3/5 T HAZ; (c,g,k) 1/5 T HAZ; (d,h,l) 1/5 T WM.
Materials 17 02056 g018
Table 1. Mechanical properties of S500Q steel.
Table 1. Mechanical properties of S500Q steel.
Yield Strength
(MPa)
Tensile Strength
(MPa)
Elongation
(%)
Impact Energy at −40 °C
(J)
470~492576~59019.5~2477~193
Table 2. Chemical compositions of S500Q steel.
Table 2. Chemical compositions of S500Q steel.
CSiMnPSNiCrTiMoAlsNbFe
0.09
~0.16
0.15
~0.45
0.08
~1.45

0.012

0.003
0.8
~1.3
0.35
~0.65
0.010
~0.030
0.35
~0.65
0.015
~0.050
0.015
~0.045
balance
Table 3. Chemical composition of AWS ER90S-G welding wire.
Table 3. Chemical composition of AWS ER90S-G welding wire.
CSiMnSPNiMoCuFe
0.09
±0.016
0.54
±0.108
1.51
±0.025
0.008
±0.0023
0.008
±0.0006
0.98
±0.156
0.25
±0.117
0.12
±0.029
balance
Table 4. Mechanical properties of AWS ER90S-G welding wire.
Table 4. Mechanical properties of AWS ER90S-G welding wire.
Yield Strength
(MPa)
Tensile Strength
(MPa)
Elongation
(%)
Impact Energy at −40 °C
(J)
601 ± 34685 ± 3526 ± 3104 ± 11
Table 5. Welding parameters.
Table 5. Welding parameters.
Lower Path Welding Current
(A)
Upper Path Welding Current
(A)
Welding Voltage
(V)
Welding Speed
(cm/min)
Gas Flow Rate
(L/min)
Wire Extension
(mm)
Inter-Pass Temperature
(°C)
Contents of CO2 in Shielding Gas
26024026202615–17130–15022%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, R.; Li, H.; Wei, F.; Zhou, Y.; Duan, W.; Zhang, K.; Lei, Z. Investigation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High-Depth-to-Width-Ratio Horizontal NG-GMAW Joint for S500Q Steel. Materials 2024, 17, 2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092056

AMA Style

Jia R, Li H, Wei F, Zhou Y, Duan W, Zhang K, Lei Z. Investigation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High-Depth-to-Width-Ratio Horizontal NG-GMAW Joint for S500Q Steel. Materials. 2024; 17(9):2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Ruiyan, Haichao Li, Fangkai Wei, Yufei Zhou, Weizan Duan, Kuiliang Zhang, and Zhenglong Lei. 2024. "Investigation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High-Depth-to-Width-Ratio Horizontal NG-GMAW Joint for S500Q Steel" Materials 17, no. 9: 2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop