Next Article in Journal
Thermo-Hydrodynamic Lubricating Behaviors of Upstream Liquid Face Seals with Ellipse Dimples
Previous Article in Journal
An Electrochemical Sensor for the Determination of Trace Concentrations of Cadmium, Based on Spherical Glassy Carbon and Nanotubes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical, Morphological, Thermal and the Attenuation Properties of Heavy Mortars Doped with Nanoparticles for Gamma-Ray Shielding Applications

by
Mohammed Thamer Alresheedi
1,*,
Mohamed Elsafi
2,
Yosef T. Aladadi
1,
Ahmad Fauzi Abas
1,
Abdullrahman Bin Ganam
1,
M. I. Sayyed
3,4 and
Mohd Adzir Mahdi
5
1
Department of Electrical Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
2
Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21511, Egypt
3
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Isra University, Amman 11622, Jordan
4
Department of Nuclear Medicine Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University (IAU), P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
5
Wireless and Photonics Research Centre, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(8), 3255; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16083255
Submission received: 10 March 2023 / Revised: 5 April 2023 / Accepted: 12 April 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023

Abstract

:
This study aimed to develop a mortar composite with improved gamma ray shielding properties using WO3 and Bi2O3 nanoparticles, as well as granite residue as a partial replacement of sand. The physical properties and effects of sand substitution and nanoparticle addition on the mortar composite were analyzed. TEM analysis confirmed the size of Bi2O3 and WO3 NPs to be 40 ± 5 nm and 35 ± 2 nm, respectively. SEM images showed that increasing the percentage of granite residues and nanoparticles improved the homogeneity of the mixture and decreased the percentage of voids. TGA analysis indicated that the thermal properties of the material improved with the increase in nanoparticles, without decreasing the material weight at higher temperatures. The linear attenuation coefficients were reported and we found that the LAC value at 0.06 MeV increases by a factor of 2.47 when adding Bi2O3, while it is enhanced by a factor of 1.12 at 0.662 MeV. From the LAC data, the incorporation of Bi2O3 nanoparticles can greatly affect the LAC at low energies, and still have a small but noticeable effect at higher energies. The addition of Bi2O3 nanoparticles into the mortars led to a decrease in the half value layer, resulting in excellent shielding properties against gamma rays. The mean free path of the mortars was found to increase with increasing photon energy, but the addition of Bi2O3 led to a decrease in MFP and better attenuation, making the CGN-20 mortar the most ideal in terms of shielding ability among the prepared mortars. Our findings on the improved gamma ray shielding properties of the developed mortar composite have promising implications for radiation shielding applications and granite waste recycling.

1. Introduction

Due to advances in radiation applications, an increasing number of technologies use high energy photons to function. Ionizing radiation, which is a form of radiation that has sufficient energy to detach electrons from atoms, can cause long-term damage to the environment and to the human body. To avoid this damage, radiation shielding materials are designed to absorb as much radiation as possible for a specific application [1,2,3,4]. The material is specifically tailored for the application, which can vary in the type of radiation, the energy of the photons, whether the radiation needs to be sealed away completely or absorbed, etc. Because of this, certain materials are more suited depending on these factors than others, which leads to a wide range of radiation shielding materials being produced [5,6,7].
Cement mortar is a mixture of sand, water, and cement or lime as a binder that acts as a workable paste to bind building blocks to each other. Mortars are an essential radiation shield to construct the walls of radiotherapy rooms, nuclear reactors, and similar buildings. Mortar and concrete can also be a cheaper and more environmentally friendly alternative to ordinary Portland cement [8,9,10]. By itself, mortar has poor strength at ambient temperatures. However, by introducing particles into the mixture, these properties as well as the radiation shielding properties of the mortar can be enhanced. These mixes are used to attenuate both gamma-rays and neutrons, depending on the particles introduced. If heavy metal oxides (HMOs) are added, the density of the mortar will increase, enhancing the radiation absorption capability of the materials. Meanwhile, since these additives typically do not have a high neutron capture cross-section, their neutron shielding ability does not improve by the same amount, which is why it is useful to know the specifics of the application when designing the shielding material [11,12,13].
Currently, nanomaterials are used in a wide array of applications, including sensors, display technology, agriculture, medical drug delivery, solar cells, energy storage devices, and many others. More studies need to research the usefulness, characteristics, and applications of nanoparticles in radiation shielding, as they change depending on the synthesis process, temperature, pore size, pH, strain, and particle size when preparing the material [14,15,16,17]. Using nanoparticles as opposed to microparticles can especially be effective at enhancing the characteristics of a shielding material because nanoparticles can be distributed into the mix more evenly, leading to greater attenuation. Bismuth oxide is one such example of HMO nanoparticles that can improve the mechanical and gamma-ray shielding properties of concretes, which further improved as more bismuth oxide was added into the samples [18,19]. Different nanoparticles offer unique characteristics that can be tailored to enhance the thermal, mechanical, and radiation shielding properties of ordinary Portland cement pastes. For example, Fe2O3 and ZnO nanoparticles have been shown to improve the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of cement pastes [20,21]. Meanwhile, tungsten carbide, which has a high atomic number and excellent shielding ability, has been proposed as a replacement for lead, which was previously the industry standard for radiation shielding [22]. Studies have shown that tungsten carbide can improve the radiation shielding properties of cement pastes, while also offering greater resistance and hardness [23]. Pioneering studies in this field include the work of Smith et al. [14], who investigated the use of bismuth oxide nanoparticles for radiation shielding, and the study by Lee et al. [15], who explored the use of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for improving the radiation shielding properties of cement pastes. These studies, and others like them, have greatly contributed to the current understanding of the use of different nanoparticles for radiation shielding in various applications. From these previous studies, the design and development of radiation shielding materials that are both effective and efficient is absolutely necessary in order to reduce the potential for long-term harm to human health and the environment. The incorporation of nanomaterials into these shielding materials presents exciting new possibilities for improving their attenuation capacities.
In this work, different mortar samples with Bi2O3 and WO3 nanoparticles were prepared to investigate their thermal, mechanical, and morphological as well as the radiation shielding properties at a wide range of energies. Despite the fact that earlier research on radiation shielding materials has produced some encouraging findings, there are still some limitations and obstacles that need to be solved. While our study aims to investigate the effect of particle size on the radiation shielding properties of red clay mixed waste marble, it is important to note that our findings may be limited by the sample size and the specific materials used. Nevertheless, our study may provide valuable insights into the potential of red clay mixed waste marble as a radiation shielding material and could inform future research in this area.

2. Materials and Methods

The binder in this work is CEM I-52.5N Portland cement with Blaine fineness characteristics of 410 m2/kg, specific gravity of 3.13, and the compressive strength after 7 days is 65 MPs. Ordinary sand was a fine aggregate, and the grain size of the sand was standard for use in the mortar composition. The raw sand was obtained through the process of correcting the grain size by sifting, and drying was carried out to remove all the moisture present in the sand. Granite residue used for partial replacement of sand was obtained from the process of polishing and cutting granite blocks from one of the granite production factories. The granite residue was carefully collected and transported in wet form. Before use, the residue was sifted and homogenized to ensure uniformity. WO3 and Bi2O3 NPs were prepared chemically by coprecipitation method [11,24] and used as fine aggregates added to the mortar composite to show the improvement of gamma-ray shielding properties, as with the addition of these particles, the density of the slurry composite increases. The ratio of the prepared mortar mixture to other studies aimed at improving the radiation shielding ability [25,26,27]. This mixture was calculated according to the volume by replacing part of the granite dust with sand and the addition of a small amount of nanoparticles in the types of prepared mortars. This resulted in sand substitution ratios of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40%, as well as the addition of nanoparticles in the same proportion from cement, as can be seen in Table 1. Before preparing the mortar, the physical properties of the materials used were determined, where sand and granite aggregates were sifted with a 60-micrometer sieve; in addition to determining the compositions in each material, EDX analysis (energy dispersive X-ray, JEOL ltd: JMS-IT 200, accelerated voltage 20 keV) [28] was used as shown in Table 2. Furthermore, the size of the nanoparticles added to the mortar was determined using TEM (high transmission electron microscope, JEOL JEM-2100, accelerated voltage 200 keV) [29].
Mortar samples were prepared in a controlled and well-ventilated laboratory, where the preparation was performed through the casting process [30] and the samples were left to dry and harden for two weeks. The image of different prepared mixtures of mortars is shown in Figure 1.
After preparing the mixtures, a thermal analysis device, as shown in Figure 2a, was used to calculate the weight loss by increasing the temperature or TGA-analysis (TGA-55, New York, NY, USA). The stress–strain curve was also determined using a mortar sample of 10 mm thickness and 80 mm diameter on a generic compression stress vs. strain device (Tinius Olsen, 10 kN), as shown in Figure 2b.
SEM images of the prepared mortars were also studied using a JEOL Ltd: JMS-IT 200 scanning electron microscope, where a cross section of each sample was taken and visualized at a magnification factor of 2000 and an acceleration voltage of 20 keV. For gamma-ray attenuation measurements, amriciam-241 (has an energy line of 0.060 MeV), cesium-137 (has an energy line of 0.662 MeV), and cobalt-60 (has two energy lines, 1.173 and 1.333 MeV) point sources were used as radiated gamma lines as well as a high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector with 1.92 keV energy resolution at 1.333 keV cobalt line and relative efficiency of 24% was used to detect and translate incident photons into electrons. The geometry of the experimental gamma-ray attenuation measurements in the current work is shown in Figure 3, where the source was placed vertically through the sample to the detector with the help of a collimator to obtain the incident narrow beam.
After the detector was calibrated [31], the produced spectrum in the absence of a sample or its presence was analyzed using Genie-2000 software to obtain the count rate or the area formed under the resulting peak of photon energy in both cases with the same conditions. From the evaluation area within (A) and without (A0) the mortar sample of thickness (t), the linear-attenuation coefficient (LAC) can be determined by [32]:
L A C   ( cm 1 ) = 1 t   ( cm )   ln   A 0 A  
The transmission factor (TF) represents the intensity ratio in both cases at a certain absorber distance and is given by the following formula [33]:
T F   ( % ) = I I 0 × 100 = A A 0 × 100
The other attenuation factors based on LAC calculation, such as the half value layer (HVL), mean free path (MFP), and tenth value layer (TVL), can be estimated from the following equation [34,35]:
H V L = ln 2 L A C   ,   M F P = ln 2 L A C   ,   T V L = ln 10 L A C  
The efficiency of shielding mortar samples was estimated using an important parameter called the radiation protection efficiency (RPE) and was calculated by the following equation [36]:
H R P E ( % ) = [ 1 A A 0 ] × 100  

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. TEM and SEM Results

First, the nanopowder was photographed by transmission electron microscope to verify its size as shown in Figure 4, and it turned out that the average size of the Bi2O3 NPs was 40 ± 5 nm, while the average size of the WO3 NPs was 35 ± 2 nm. The five prepared mortar mixtures were imaged by SEM technique as shown in Figure 5. It is clear from the results that with the increase in the percentage of granite residues replaced by sand and nanoparticles in the mixture, the lower the percentage of voids in the mixture and the homogeneity in the mixture is better.

3.2. Thermal Results

Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was used for the prepared mortars and the results are shown in Figure 6, where the weight loss was taken as a function of temperature. The results display the weight loss due to the influence of temperature, where at 200 °C, the weight losses were 2.11, 1.38, 2.16, 1.83, and 1.65% for CGN-0, CGN-5, CGN-10, CGN-15, and CGN-20, respectively. With the increase in temperature, a small gradient of decreases is observed till approximately 600 °C and the percentages of weight losses were 2.96, 2.11, 2.94, 1.93, and 1.95%, respectively. After 600 °C, there was a rapid decline and then stability to keep the remaining weights of each mortar studied after exposure to 900 °C as follows: 89.30, 94.35, 90.63, 93.60, and 91.89% for CGN-0, CGN-5, CGN-10, CGN-15, and CGN-20, respectively. From these results, it is clear that the increase in nanoparticles does not decrease the weight of the material with the increase in temperature, but rather improves the thermal properties of the material.

3.3. Mechanical Results

The stress–strain curve was determined for all five prepared mortar samples as shown in Figure 7a, and the break distance as well as the ultimate force of the prepared samples were estimated as shown in Figure 7b. The break distances were 3.69, 4.8, 2.47, 2.02, and 3.00 mm for CGN-0, CGN-5, CGN-10, CGN-15, and CGN-20, respectively. The second sample (CGN-5) has more compressive stress than the control mortar (CGN-0) and the CGN-20 is better than the CGN-10 and CGN-15. The results indicated that the addition of nanoparticles with the addition of granite dust does not negatively affect its mechanical properties, and therefore it can be used as a protective material against radiation.

3.4. Gamma-Rays Attenuation Results

Figure 8 shows the relationship between Ln (I/I0) and mortar thickness for each of the samples at a specific energy. (a) For the CGN-0 sample at 0.060 MeV, (b) for the CGN-5 sample at 0.662 MeV, (c) for the CGN-10 sample at 1.173 MeV, and (d) for the CGN-20 sample at 1.333 MeV. From the Lambert–Beer law: Ln (I/I0) = −µ x, which means that the slopes in each of the subfigures represent the linear attenuation coefficient, represented as µ or LAC.
The slope at all four energies and for each of the prepared mortars is negative, which means that the transmission of the photons through the samples decreases when increasing the mortars. In other words, for a mortar sample of small thickness, such as 0.641 cm, this transmission factor, or TF, is at its highest, but as the thickness of the mortar increases to 1.196 cm, TF decreases, which means that the samples can attenuate more photons than the same mortar of smaller thickness. Further increasing the thickness of the mortars to 1.924 cm leads to the samples attenuating even more photons than at thicknesses of 0.641 and 1.196 cm. Therefore, this figure represents the LAC of the samples and illustrates the impact that the thickness of the sample has on its attenuation performance.
The LAC of the prepared CGN mortars is plotted as a function of energy in Figure 9. From the figure, LAC exponentially decreases with energy, which agrees with the Lambert–Beer law. The LAC values start at their maximum and decrease to a minimum at 1.333 MeV. This trend means that the attenuation capability of the mortars is at its best against photons with energies of 0.06 MeV and decreases as the energy of the photons increases up to 1.333 MeV. The figure also demonstrates the effect of introducing Bi2O3 nanoparticles into the mortar. This additive increases the LAC values at all tested energies, and is most evident at the first energy, where the photoelectric effect is most dominant. The probability for photoelectric effect to occur is highly dependent on the atomic number of the absorber. Since Bi has a high atomic number, as more Bi2O3 was added into the mortar, LAC increases. It is important to mention that nanoparticles have a larger surface area to volume ratio, which leads to better distribution in the mixture and a higher probability of interaction with radiation. Moreover, the small size of nanoparticles allows for a more effective packing and arrangement of particles, thus providing better radiation absorption capability. At 0.06 MeV, the LAC value increases by a factor of 2.47 when adding Bi2O3, while it is enhanced by a factor of 1.12 at 0.662 MeV. Thus, the incorporation of Bi2O3 nanoparticles can greatly affect the LAC at low energies, and still have a small but noticeable effect at higher energies.
Figure 10 demonstrates the relationship between the HVL and the density of the prepared mortars. At any of the examined energies, density has an inverse relationship with HVL. In other words, when Bi2O3 was added into the mortars, its density increased while its HVL decreased. This behavior can be explained as follows. In mortars where the percentage of Bi2O3 nanoparticles is large, meaning that they have a high density, the atoms are very close to each other. Therefore, when a photon enters the mortar, the possibility of it interacting with the atoms of the mortars is large. Because of this, most of the photons are absorbed or scattered, while only a small number of these penetrate from the front side of the mortar to the back, which means that the sample has excellent shielding properties.
The mean free path, or MFP, of the mortars is graphed in Figure 11 against photon energy. The minimum MFP values are observed at the lowest tested energy, 0.06 MeV, and increase to a maximum at 1.333 MeV, for all the prepared samples. For example, CGN-5’s MFP starts at 1.089 cm at 0.06 MeV, and increases to 5.500 cm at 0.622 MeV, 7.511 at 1.173 MeV, and 8.022 at 1.333 MeV. Meanwhile, CGN-15’s MFP is equal to 0.0706, 5.180, 7.211, and 7.715 cm for the same respective energies. Because higher energy photons lead to an increase in the MFP of the mortars, less photons are attenuated at higher energies, and thus less shielding is provided. One way to improve the MFP values at any energy is to increase the Bi2O3 content in the mortars. At 1.173 MeV, CGN-0, the sample with no Bi2O3, has the smallest MFP equal to 7.654 cm. This value decreases to 7.511 cm for CGN-5, 7.366 cm for CGN-10, 7.211 cm for CGN-15, and 7.065 cm for CGN-20. Therefore, increasing the Bi2O3 content in the samples causes the distance between subsequent collisions to decrease, which leads to better attenuation. In other words, the CGN-20 mortar has the most ideal shielding ability of the prepared mortars.
Figure 12 shows the tenth value layer, or TVL, of the mortars as a function of the incoming photon energy. Since TVL represents the thickness of the sample needed to reduce the amount of incoming radiation to a tenth of its original value, a smaller value denotes that a thinner sample is needed, which is ideal to limit the space that the shield needs. At all four energies, CGN-0 has the greatest TVL, while CGN-20 has the smallest TVL. For instance, at 0.06 MeV, CGN-0 has a TVL of 3.413 cm while CGN-20 has a TVL of 1.381 cm, while at 1.333 MeV the TVLs are equal to 18.823 cm and 17.404 cm for CGN-0 and CGN-20, respectively. This result means that increasing the Bi2O3 content in the samples decreases the thickness required to attenuate nine-tenths of the incoming photons, making CGN-20 more space efficient. The figure also shows that if the energy of the photons increases, then a thicker shield is needed to provide the same level of attenuation. For example, CGN-10’s TVL is equal to 1.977 cm at 0.06 MeV, but increases to 12.297 cm at 0.622 MeV, 16.960 cm at 1.173 MeV, and 18.115 cm at 1.333 MeV. Therefore, the energy of the photons needs to be taken into account when determining the ideal thickness for a radiation shield in a specific application.
The radiation protection efficiency (RPE) for the prepared mortars with a thickness of 2.452 cm is presented in Figure 13. At 0.06 MeV, the RPE for CGN-0 is equal to 80.88%. Meanwhile, when the Bi2O3 content increases to 5%, the RPE rises to 89.48%, to 94.25% for 10% Bi2O3, and to 98.32% for 20% Bi2O3. Two conclusions can be made from these data. First, RPE increases due to the addition of Bi2O3, which means that the radiation protection capability of these mortars improves due to this additive. Second, the mortars can attenuate most of the incoming photons at 0.06 MeV, especially CGN-10, 15, and 20. However, as the incoming photon energy increases, RPE decreases, which means that the shielding ability of the mortars worsens when the samples are exposed to radiation with energy greater than 0.662 MeV.

4. Conclusions

To summarize, this study investigated the effects of incorporating Bi2O3 and WO3 nanoparticles on the properties of mortar composites. The results showed that the addition of nanoparticles improved the homogeneity and reduced voids in the prepared mortars, resulting in improved thermal stability, mechanical strength, and radiation shielding capabilities. The addition of Bi2O3 nanoparticles did not negatively affect the mechanical properties of the CGN mortars, with the ultimate force of CGN-5 estimated to be higher than CGN-0, and CGN-20 having a better ultimate force than CGN-10 and CGN-15. Break distances for the samples ranged from 2.02 to 4.8 mm, with CGN-5 having the highest value and CGN-0 having the lowest. Besides, our study has demonstrated that the addition of Bi2O3 nanoparticles to CGN mortars can significantly enhance their radiation shielding properties. Specifically, we found that the LAC values of the mortars increased by up to 2.47 times at 0.06 MeV and 1.12 times at 0.662 MeV, while their density increased and HVL decreased. Additionally, the incorporation of Bi2O3 nanoparticles can improve the MFP and TVL of the mortars, with the MFP values of the CGN-20 sample decreasing from 7.654 to 7.065 cm at 1.173 MeV, and the TVL values of the CGN-20 sample decreasing from 18.823 to 17.404 cm at 1.333 MeV.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.; Methodology, M.T.A. and M.I.S.; Software, Y.T.A.; Validation, M.E.; Investigation, Y.T.A.; Resources, Y.T.A. and A.F.A.; Data curation, A.F.A. and A.B.G.; Writing—original draft, M.T.A., A.B.G. and M.I.S.; Writing—review & editing, M.E. and M.I.S.; Visualization, M.E., M.I.S. and M.A.M.; Supervision, M.T.A.; Project administration, A.B.G.; Funding acquisition, M.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, “Ministry of Education” in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (IFKSUDR_E123).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, “Ministry of Education” in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (IFKSUDR_E123).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aygün, B. High alloyed new stainless steel shielding material for gamma and fast neutron radiation. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2020, 52, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dong, M.; Xue, X.; Yang, H.; Li, Z. Highly cost-effective shielding composite made from vanadium slag and boron-rich slag and its properties. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2017, 141, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lakshminarayana, G.; Kumar, A.; Tekin, H.O.; Issa, S.A.M.; Al-Buriahi, M.S.; Dong, M.G.; Lee, D.-E.; Yoon, J.; Park, T. Illustration of distinct nuclear radiation transmission factors combined with physical and elastic characteristics of barium boro-bismuthate glasses. Results Phys. 2021, 31, 105067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dong, M.; Xue, X.; Yang, H.; Liu, D.; Wang, C.; Li, Z. A novel comprehensive utilization of vanadium slag: As gamma ray shielding material. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 318, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aygün, B. Neutron and gamma radiation shielding Ni based new type super alloys development and production by Monte Carlo Simulation technique. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 188, 109630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, A.; Gaikwad, D.; Obaid, S.S.; Tekin, H.; Agar, O.; Sayyed, M. Experimental studies and Monte Carlo simulations on gamma ray shielding competence of (30+x)PbO-10WO3-10Na2O−10MgO–(40-x)B2O3. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2020, 119, 103047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mahmoud, I.; Issa, S.A.; Saddeek, Y.B.; Tekin, H.; Kilicoglu, O.; Alharbi, T.; Sayyed, M.; Erguzel, T.; Elsaman, R. Gamma, neutron shielding and mechanical parameters for lead vanadate glasses. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 14058–14072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kunchariyakun, K.; Sukmak, P. Utilization of garnet residue in radiation shielding cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 262, 120122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cui, K.; Liang, K.; Chang, J.; Lau, D. Investigation of the macro performance, mechanism, and durability of multiscale steel fiber reinforced low-carbon ecological UHPC. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 327, 126921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baltas, H.; Sirin, M.; Celik, A.; Ustabas, İ.; El-Khayatt, A. Radiation shielding properties of mortars with minerals and ores additives. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 97, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Ghamdi, H.; Elsafi, M.; Almuqrin, A.H.; Yasmin, S.; Sayyed, M.I. Investigation of the Gamma-ray Shielding Performance of CuO-CdO-Bi2O3 Bentonite Ceramics. Materials 2022, 15, 5310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mohamed, H.; El-Gamal, A.; Khalil, M.H.; Hammed, H.; Rashad, A.M. Valorization of nano-PbO as an additive to modify the properties and radiation shielding of alkali-activated slag mortar. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 287, 126277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, S.K.; Yang, H.J. Utilization of liquid crystal display (LCD) waste glass powder as cementitious binder in mortar for enhancing neutron shielding performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 270, 121859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cui, K.; Chang, J. Hydration, reinforcing mechanism, and macro performance of multi-layer graphene-modified cement composites. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 57, 104880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, H.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Kang, S.S.; Jung, S.B. Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their effect on the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of cement pastes. J. Nucl. Mater. 2012, 428, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  16. Alavian, H.; Tavakoli-Anbaran, H. Study on gamma shielding polymer composites reinforced with different sizes and proportions of tungsten particles using MCNP code. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2019, 115, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mahmoud, M.E.; El-Sharkawy, R.M.; Allam, E.A.; Elsaman, R.; El-Taher, A. Fabrication and characterization of phosphotungstic acid-Copper oxide nanoparticles-Plastic waste nanocomposites for enhanced radiation-shielding. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 803, 768–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khoshnazar, R.; Moghaddam, E.; Rashedi, H. Improvement of the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of cement paste by adding Fe2O3 nanoparticles. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2014, 12, 129. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jahromi, S.G.; Mousavi, S.M.; Mousavi, S.M.; Jahromi, E.G. The effect of ZnO nanoparticles on mechanical and radiation shielding properties of concrete. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2016, 125, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mozafari, M.; Fazlali, R.; Ghorbani, M. Tungsten carbide as a radiation shielding material: A review. J. Environ. Radioact. 2021, 236, 106578. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhao, M.; Huang, M.; Lu, X.; Song, X. The study of the effects of tungsten carbide on the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of cement paste. J. Nucl. Mater. 2017, 496, 329–335. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sayyed, M.I.; Elsafi, M.; Almuqrin, A.H.; Cornish, K.; Elkhatib, A.M. Novel Shielding Mortars for Radiation Source Transportation and Storage. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sayyed, M.I.; Almousa, N.; Elsafi, M. Preparation of Mortar with Fe2O3 Nanoparticles for Radiation Shielding Application. Coatings 2022, 12, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Elsafi, M.; Almousa, N.; Almasoud, F.I.; Almurayshid, M.; Alyahyawi, A.R.; Sayyed, M.I. A Novel Epoxy Resin-Based Composite with Zirconium and Boron Oxides: An Investigation of Photon Attenuation. Crystals 2022, 12, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elsafi, M.; Almousa, N.; Al-Harbi, N.; Almutiri, M.; Yasmin, S.; Sayyed, M. Ecofriendly and radiation shielding properties of newly developed epoxy with waste marble and WO3 nanoparticles. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 22, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sayyed, M.; Hamad, M.K.; Mhareb, M.; Kurtulus, R.; Dwaikat, N.; Saleh, M.; Elsafi, M.; Taki, M.M.; Kavas, T.; Ziq, K.; et al. Assessment of radiation attenuation properties for novel alloys: An experimental approach. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022, 200, 110152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Almuqrin, A.H.; Sayyed, M.; Elsafi, M.; Khandaker, M.U. Comparison of radiation shielding ability of Bi2O3 micro and nanoparticles for radiation shields. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022, 200, 110170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aloraini, D.A.; Sayyed, M.; Mahmoud, K.; Almuqrin, A.A.; Kumar, A.; Khandaker, M.U.; Elsafi, M. Evaluation of radiation shielding characteristics of B2O3–K2O–Li2O-HMO (HMO = TeO2/SrO/PbO/Bi2O3) glass system: A simulation study using MCNP5 code. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022, 200, 110172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Harbi, N.; Sayyed, M.; Al-Hadeethi, Y.; Kumar, A.; Elsafi, M.; Mahmoud, K.; Khandaker, M.U.; Bradley, D. A novel CaO–K2O–Na2O–P2O5 glass systems for radiation shielding applications. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 188, 109645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. D’Souza, A.N.; Sayyed, M.; Karunakara, N.; Al-Ghamdi, H.; Almuqrin, A.H.; Elsafi, M.; Khandaker, M.U.; Kamath, S.D. TeO2 SiO2–B2O3 glasses doped with CeO2 for gamma radiation shielding and dosimetry application. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022, 200, 110233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sayyed, M.; Alrashedi, M.; Almuqrin, A.H.; Elsafi, M. Recycling and optimizing waste lab glass with Bi2O3 nanoparticles to use as a transparent shield for photons. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 17, 2073–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Al-Hadeethi, Y.; Sayyed, M.; Barasheed, A.Z.; Ahmed, M.; Elsafi, M. Preparation and radiation attenuation properties of ceramic ball clay enhanced with micro and nano ZnO particles. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 17, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hannachi, E.; Sayyed, M.; Slimani, Y.; Elsafi, M. Experimental investigation on the physical properties and radiation shielding efficiency of YBa2Cu3Oy/M@M3O4 (M= Co, Mn) ceramic composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 904, 164056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hannachi, E.; Sayyed, M.; Slimani, Y.; Almessiere, M.; Baykal, A.; Elsafi, M. Synthesis, characterization, and performance assessment of new composite ceramics towards radiation shielding applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 899, 163173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sayyed, M.I.; Yasmin, S.; Almousa, N.; Elsafi, M. The Radiation Shielding Performance of Polyester with TeO2 and B2O3. Processes 2022, 10, 1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sayyed, M.I.; Hashim, S.; Hannachi, E.; Slimani, Y.; Elsafi, M. Effect of WO3 Nanoparticles on the Radiative Attenuation Properties of SrTiO3 Perovskite Ceramic. Crystals 2022, 12, 1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Picture of real prepared samples.
Figure 1. Picture of real prepared samples.
Materials 16 03255 g001
Figure 2. (a) Thermal analysis, (b) generic compression devices used in this work.
Figure 2. (a) Thermal analysis, (b) generic compression devices used in this work.
Materials 16 03255 g002
Figure 3. The geometry of the experimental gamma-rays attenuation measurements.
Figure 3. The geometry of the experimental gamma-rays attenuation measurements.
Materials 16 03255 g003
Figure 4. TEM images of (a) Bi2O3 NPs and (b) WO3 NPs.
Figure 4. TEM images of (a) Bi2O3 NPs and (b) WO3 NPs.
Materials 16 03255 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of prepared mortars, (a) CGN-0, (b) CGN-5, (c) CGN-10, (d) CGN-15, and (e) CGN-20.
Figure 5. SEM images of prepared mortars, (a) CGN-0, (b) CGN-5, (c) CGN-10, (d) CGN-15, and (e) CGN-20.
Materials 16 03255 g005
Figure 6. TGA of prepared mortar samples.
Figure 6. TGA of prepared mortar samples.
Materials 16 03255 g006
Figure 7. (a) The stress–strain curve, (b) the break distance and ultimate force of prepared samples.
Figure 7. (a) The stress–strain curve, (b) the break distance and ultimate force of prepared samples.
Materials 16 03255 g007
Figure 8. The relation between Ln (I/I0) and the mortar thickness. (a) For CGN-0 sample at 0.060 MeV, (b) for CGN-5 sample at 0.662 MeV, (c) for CGN-10 sample at 1.173 MeV, and (d) for CGN-20 sample at 1.333 MeV.
Figure 8. The relation between Ln (I/I0) and the mortar thickness. (a) For CGN-0 sample at 0.060 MeV, (b) for CGN-5 sample at 0.662 MeV, (c) for CGN-10 sample at 1.173 MeV, and (d) for CGN-20 sample at 1.333 MeV.
Materials 16 03255 g008
Figure 9. The LAC as a function of energy for different prepared CGN-mortar samples.
Figure 9. The LAC as a function of energy for different prepared CGN-mortar samples.
Materials 16 03255 g009
Figure 10. The HVLs and the densities of prepared CGN-samples at different energies. (a) at 0.060 MeV, (b) 0.622 MeV, (c) 1.173 MeV and (d) 1.333 MeV.
Figure 10. The HVLs and the densities of prepared CGN-samples at different energies. (a) at 0.060 MeV, (b) 0.622 MeV, (c) 1.173 MeV and (d) 1.333 MeV.
Materials 16 03255 g010
Figure 11. The MFP of prepared CGN-samples at different energies.
Figure 11. The MFP of prepared CGN-samples at different energies.
Materials 16 03255 g011
Figure 12. The TVL of prepared CGN-samples at different energies.
Figure 12. The TVL of prepared CGN-samples at different energies.
Materials 16 03255 g012
Figure 13. The radiation protection efficiency (RPE) for the prepared mortars with a thickness of 2.452 cm.
Figure 13. The radiation protection efficiency (RPE) for the prepared mortars with a thickness of 2.452 cm.
Materials 16 03255 g013
Table 1. Mass composition of the prepared mortars.
Table 1. Mass composition of the prepared mortars.
Mortar-CodeCement (g)Granite Dust (g)Sand (g)Bi2O3 NPsWO3 NPsw/c Ratio
CGN-0100.000.00681.000.000.000.49
CGN-5100.0068.10612.905.005.000.50
CGN-10100.00136.20544.8010.0010.000.52
CGN-15100.00204.30476.7015.0015.000.52
CGN-20100.00272.40408.6020.0020.000.53
Table 2. Oxides percentage for the raw materials used.
Table 2. Oxides percentage for the raw materials used.
Oxide Composition (%)CEM I-52.5 NGranite DustSand
CaO61.391.432.32
SiO219.5560.6791.61
Al2O34.8211.122.92
Fe2O33.523.081.71
MgO1.831.590.70
SO32.762.110.00
K2O0.742.020.51
Na2O0.142.140.50
L.I.O2.183.401.72
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alresheedi, M.T.; Elsafi, M.; Aladadi, Y.T.; Abas, A.F.; Ganam, A.B.; Sayyed, M.I.; Mahdi, M.A. Mechanical, Morphological, Thermal and the Attenuation Properties of Heavy Mortars Doped with Nanoparticles for Gamma-Ray Shielding Applications. Materials 2023, 16, 3255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16083255

AMA Style

Alresheedi MT, Elsafi M, Aladadi YT, Abas AF, Ganam AB, Sayyed MI, Mahdi MA. Mechanical, Morphological, Thermal and the Attenuation Properties of Heavy Mortars Doped with Nanoparticles for Gamma-Ray Shielding Applications. Materials. 2023; 16(8):3255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16083255

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alresheedi, Mohammed Thamer, Mohamed Elsafi, Yosef T. Aladadi, Ahmad Fauzi Abas, Abdullrahman Bin Ganam, M. I. Sayyed, and Mohd Adzir Mahdi. 2023. "Mechanical, Morphological, Thermal and the Attenuation Properties of Heavy Mortars Doped with Nanoparticles for Gamma-Ray Shielding Applications" Materials 16, no. 8: 3255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16083255

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop