Next Article in Journal
Acoustic Emission and K-S Metric Entropy as Methods to Analyze the Influence of Gamma-Aluminum Oxide Nanopowder on the Destruction Process of GFRP Composite Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Structural and Morphological Characterization of Thin Magnetic Films: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Combined Addition of CeLa and GdY on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of As-Cast Al-Cu-Mn Alloys

National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on High-Strength Structural Materials, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(23), 7332; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237332
Submission received: 9 November 2023 / Revised: 23 November 2023 / Accepted: 23 November 2023 / Published: 25 November 2023

Abstract

:
In this study, the effects of the combined addition of CeLa and GdY on the microstructure and mechanical properties of as-cast Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and tensile testing. The results show that the minor addition of CeLa and GdY leads to a refinement of grain size. The addition of CeLa results in the formation of supersaturated vacancies in the Al matrix, whereas the addition of GdY leads to a decrease in the precipitation temperature of the Al2Cu phase. The combined CeLa and GdY additions can significantly increase ultimate tensile strength (UTS) while losing only a small amount of elongation (EL). Compared with the unmodified alloy, the grain size and SDAS of the alloy (0.2 wt.% CeLa + 0.1 wt.% GdY) were diminished by 67.2% and 58.7%, respectively, while maximum hardness and UTS rose by 31.2% and 36.9%, respectively.

1. Introduction

Al-Cu-Mn alloys have been extensively used in military and automotive applications due to their high strength, good corrosion resistance, and excellent fatigue properties [1,2]. In the preparation of materials, we constantly strive for high overall performance. Unlike deformable aluminum alloys, the properties of as-cast Al-Cu-Mn alloys are highly dependent on the melting and casting processes. During the casting process, casting defects (such as hot cracks and shrinkage cavities) are inevitable to form, which limits their widespread application [3,4]. Therefore, improving their castability is particularly important to improve the microstructure and mechanical properties of as-cast Al-Cu-Mn alloys.
Adding small amounts of rare earth (RE) such as Ce [5,6,7], La [8,9,10], Sm [11,12,13], Sc [14,15], Gd [16,17,18], and Er [19,20,21] has been proven to play a good role in the purification and densification of aluminum alloy melt, reducing casting defects and making the microstructure more dense [22,23,24]. At the same time, the addition of RE can refine the grain size of the as-cast alloy by promoting composition overcooling [25]. Yao et al. found that adding 0.3 wt.% La had a significant refining effect on Al-Cu alloy grains due to their segregation and collection in the solidification front [8]. The measured average grain sizes are 0.155 and 0.035 mm for the Al-Cu alloys without La and with La, respectively. The addition of RE can also promote the formation of RE-rich phases and improve the comprehensive properties of aluminum alloys [26]. For example, Amer et al. discovered the existence of the Al8Cu4Gd phase in Al-Cu alloys when 0.25 wt.% Gd was added [16]. These phases improved the mechanical properties of Al-Cu alloys. Guo et al. found that the strength and hardness of the alloys with the addition of 0.1 wt.% Y were increased due to the existence of the Al8Cu4Y phase [27]. After T6 heat treatment, the alloy containing 0.1 wt.% Y (181 HV) exhibits a 48% increase in hardness compared to the unalloyed alloy (122 HV). The individual RE (Ce [28], La [29], Gd [30] and Y [27]) can all modify Al-Cu-Mn alloys to enhance their overall performance. However, excessive addition of individual RE can lead to coarse grains and excessive intermetallic compounds, which have a detrimental effect on the mechanical properties.
The literature has reported the effect of the combined addition of CeLa [31,32], LaY [33], CeY [34], LaPr [35], and LaSc [36] on the microstructure and properties of Al-Cu alloys. The results show that binary combined additions of Re have a significant effect on the grain refinement of the alloy. Liu et al. [37] studied the impact of 0.3 wt.% LaCe on the solidification process of Al-Cu alloys. Their findings indicated that CeLa could increase melt subcooling by inhibiting the nucleation of α-Al on large heterogeneous particles, resulting in grain refinement. Shuai et al. found that when 0.6 wt.% LaY was added to the Al-Si-Cu alloy, the SDAS of α-Al decreased to 77.56 µm, which is 75.11% lower than Al-Si-Cu [33]. Furthermore, binary combined additions of Re demonstrated better performances than single additions of rare earth elements. Wang et al. found that the simultaneous addition of CeY had a better grain refinement effect than the addition of Ce [34] alone. The average grain size of the alloy was 150.04 ± 5 µm when Ce alone was added, but was reduced to 90.23 ± 5 µm with the addition of CeY. Song et al. added La and LaSc to Al-Cu alloys [36]. The results showed that the grain size of Al-Cu-La-Sc alloy (69.25 µm) was smaller than that of Al-Cu-La alloy (118.53 µm). However, binary combined additions of RE above a certain amount can also have an adverse effect on the mechanical properties of the alloy. Du et al. [38] investigated the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Cu-Mn alloys with different CeLa additions. The results showed that the addition of 0.25 wt.% CeLa improved the room-temperature mechanical properties of the alloy, but the addition of 0.5 wt.% CeLa promoted the formation of coarse Al8Cu4Ce and Al6Cu6La phases, resulting in a decrease in mechanical properties.
Based on the above analysis, the multi-compound addition of RE can be used as a potential way to reduce the casting defects of alloys. Furthermore, the multi-compound addition of RE presents the opportunity to achieve highly refined grains and generate a suitable quantity of intermetallic compounds using a lower total amount of RE, resulting in superior mechanical properties. Previous [34,36] literature has reported the effect of LaSc or LaPr in Al-Cu alloys, respectively. Although the RE (Sc or Pr) has a good modifying effect, the RE has a high price and is not suitable for large-scale applications. The storage capacity of RE (Ce, La, Gd, and Y) accounts for the largest proportion of all rare earth elements, and their prices are 80–100 times lower than Sc. Moreover, as the by-product of Sc, increasing the utilization rate of RE (Ce, La, Gd, and Y) can achieve the purpose of saving the earth’s resources and reducing environmental pollution, just like biodegradable materials [39]. Therefore, it would be an interesting research direction to study the effect of the combined addition of Ce, La, Gd, and Y on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Cu alloys. However, little research has investigated the effect of the combined addition of CeLa and GdY on Al-Cu-Mn alloys.
In this study, the effects of combined additions of CeLa and GdY on the microstructure and mechanical properties of cast Al-Cu-Mn alloys at both room temperature and T6 heat treatment and the relevant mechanisms are clarified. The findings in this study can assist in the development of modifiers and broaden the application of Al-Cu-Mn alloys.

2. Materials and Methods

The Al-4Cu-1Mn (wt.%)-based alloy was obtained by melting pure Al (purity 99.99%), Al-Cu, and Al-Mn intermediate alloys in the resistance melting furnace. The Al-4Cu-1Mn alloy was completely melted at 780 °C and then held for 10 min, and predetermined amounts of Al-CeLa and Al-GdY master alloys were wrapped in aluminum foil and added to the molten liquid. The melt was held at 760 °C for 20 min, and when the intermediate alloy was completely melted, the whole melt was refined with C2Cl6. Then, the melt was stirred briefly and kept warm for 10 min. It was then poured into an uncovered cylindrical steel mold with a dimension of φ120 × 200 mm (preheated at 250 °C). Finally, the Al-4Cu-1Mn alloy ingots were obtained with composite additions of CeLa and GdY in various compositions. The alloys were subjected to Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) analysis to determine their chemical composition, and the results are shown in Table 1.
The physical phase composition of the alloy was determined by X-ray diffractometry (XRD), and the data obtained were analyzed using jade6.5 software. The T6 heat treatment temperature of the as-cast alloy was determined by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analysis with a specimen weight of 10 mg and a temperature increase rate of 10 °C/min. The peak aging state was determined by determining the Vickers hardness using a 200HV-5 hardness tester with a load of 5 kg and a duration of 15 s. The average of five points was taken. The room temperature tensile properties of the alloy were measured using the Instron 3369 testing machine at a loading rate of 2.0 mm/min after the alloy was subjected to a T6 heat treatment (solid solution treatment at 535 °C for 16 h and aging at 180 °C for 6 h). The dimensions of the standard tensile specimen are shown in Figure 1. Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS), Yield Strength (YS), and Elongation (EL) are determined based on the average of three tests. The micro-morphology was characterized by Optical Microscope (OM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) equipped with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) equipped with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Aztec Crystal and Image Pro Plus 6.0 software were used to determine the specimen grain size and secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS). After the tensile test, the fracture was observed with a scanning electron microscope to determine the possible fracture mechanism of the alloy.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructure

Figure 2 shows the grain structure corresponding to alloys with different rare earth contents. Compared with the coarse dendrites in the unalloyed Al-4Cu-1Mn alloy (Figure 2a), there was a significant decrease in the coarse α-Al dendrites and an increase in the fine isometric α-Al dendrites in the alloys with the addition of CeLa and GdY, respectively. The grains in the alloys containing CeLa and GdY are predominantly made up of fine equiaxial α-Al dendrites. In addition, it can be found that there are some defects distributed at grain boundaries in the alloy without RE addition (Figure 2a). After the addition of RE, the number of defects in the alloy decreased sharply. This indicates that RE can purify the melt and improve the casting performance of the alloy.
Figure 3 shows the grain size of the studied alloy. A comparison of grain sizes in alloys with varying RE contents indicates a significant decrease in grain size when RE is added. The grain size and SDAS of the alloy were measured using Aztec Crystal 2.0 and IPP software 6.0, as shown in Figure 4. The results show that the grain size and SDAS of the alloy with CeLa and GdY added are reduced from 1022 ± 337 µm and 103.8 ± 11.7 µm to 386 ± 64 µm and 42.8 ± 11.7 µm, respectively, as compared to the undenatured alloy. However, the grain size and SDAS of the alloy with CeLa alone are 474 ± 76 μm and 59.1 ± 4.7 μm, respectively. On the other hand, the grain size and SDAS of the alloy with GdY addition alone are 710 ± 122 μm and 57.1 ± 8.8 μm, respectively. This suggests that the combined addition of 0.2 CeLa and 0.1 GdY (Figure 3d) may provide better refinement than adding 0.2 CeLa or 0.1 GdY (Figure 3b,c).
Figure 5a shows the XRD pattern of the combined addition of different RE-cast alloys. It can be seen that alloy 1 without added RE and alloy 2 with added 0.2 LaCe are mainly composed of α-Al phase and Al2Cu phase. However, a small amount of the AlCuMnRE phase is detected in alloy 3 after the addition of GdY. When CeLa + GdY is added, a new phase, the AlCuRE phase, appears in alloy 4, which may be the Al8Cu4Re phase. Figure 5b shows the DSC curves of the studied alloys, which are selected in the temperature range of 380 to 580 °C. It is observed that a heat absorption peak is observed in this temperature interval, which is the melt heat absorption peak of the Al2Cu phase. In addition, the peak heat absorption of the alloy 1 without RE addition is 549.9 °C, which is reduced by the addition of GdY. The combined added CeLa + GdY alloy 4 has the smallest peak heat absorption of 540.0 °C.
Figure 6 shows the backscattered electron (BSE) images of the cast alloys of Al-4Cu-1Mn with varying RE additions. Most of the intermetallic particles formed in the four alloys are observed to be in spherical and elongated Al2Cu phases. The structure of the Al2Cu phase in Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys without RE addition is reticulated. It is located almost discontinuously in the interstices of the secondary dendrite arms and at the grain boundaries (Figure 6a). The addition of CeLa decreases the number of circular Al2Cu phases and increases the number of elongated Al2Cu phases in alloy 2, which are connected to each other to form a network. Further magnification reveals the generation of a gray massive phase around a small amount of Al2Cu phase (Figure 6b). After the addition of GdY, as shown in Figure 6c, the volume of the circular Al2Cu phase in the alloy 3 decreases significantly, and the number of elongated Al2Cu phases becomes finer and connects into a network. Further magnification shows that the Al2Cu phase is mostly transformed into gray bulk phases. After the combined addition of CeLa + GdY, the size of the round Al2Cu phase in alloy 4 further decreases, and the number of elongated Al2Cu phases further increases to form more networks. Further magnification shows that the elongated Al2Cu phase mesh structure disappears, and the Al2Cu phase is almost completely transformed into a gray massive phase while a new bright bulk phase is generated. Combined with the XRD results, it has been determined that the gray massive phase is AlCuMnRE and the bright massive phase is AlCuRE.
To further investigate the characteristics of intermetallic compounds in alloys after the addition of RE. Figure 7 displays SEM images and EDS analyses of the intermetallic compounds of Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys with different RE additions after heat treatment. The bulk gray phase in the unalloyed RE alloy consists of Al, Cu, and Mn elements (Figure 7a). With the addition of CeLa, the AlCuMnCeLa phase replaces the grey AlCuMn phase, and a very small amount of bright white AlCuCeLa phase is produced (Figure 7b). With the addition of GdY, some gray phases composed of AlCuMnGd and white phases composed of AlCuMnY are observed (Figure 7c). With the combined addition of CeLa + GdY, the bright white phase of the alloy consists of the elements (Al, Cu, Ce, La, Gd, and Y), and the gray phase consists of the elements (Al, Cu, Mn, Ce, La, Gd, and Y) (Figure 7d). The findings demonstrate that the combined addition of CeLa + GdY changes the morphology of the RE-rich phases and increases their amount.
Figure 8 depicts the TEM images of unalloyed and combined CeLa and GdY alloys. The short rod-like particles in Figure 8a–c are in the T(Al20Cu2Mn3) phase, and the needle-like particles in Figure 8d are in the θ′ (Al2Cu) phase. It can be seen that alloy 1 without the addition of RE contains more coarse T phases and some needle-like θ′ phases. The quantity of T phases decreases after alloying, especially after the combined addition of CeLa + GdY. The alloy precipitates more θ′ phases with a more uniform distribution after aging. Furthermore, observation of the morphology of the θ′ phase reveals that the addition of CeLaGdY refines the θ′ phase of the alloy. The results show that the incorporation of CeLaGdY in Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys leads to a reduction in the amount of the T phase and an increase in the volume fraction of the θ′ phase. In addition, the θ′ phase exhibits a finer and denser structure.

3.2. Mechanical Properties

In general, after appropriate heat treatment, cast alloys can only be used as structural materials [4]. Therefore, alloys with different combinations of RE additions were T6 heat-treated. The alloy was solid solution treated at 535 °C for 16 h and then aged at 180 °C after quenching. Figure 9 shows the aging curves of the studied alloys. The solid solution heat treatment results in Cu and Mn supersaturation. After quenching, the Al solid solution decomposes into T and θ′ phase precipitation and nucleation. Due to the precipitation of strengthening phases, all of the alloys achieved their utmost hardness after being aged at 180 °C for 6 h. Furthermore, it can be seen that the maximum hardnesses of alloy 1, alloy 2, and alloy 3 are 58.5 ± 0.9 HV, 63.5 ± 1.4 HV, and 62.3 ± 0.7 HV, respectively. Notably, alloy 4 with the combined addition of CeLa and GdY has the highest hardness of 76.5 ± 1 HV, which is significantly higher than the other three alloys.
The ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength (YS), and elongation (EL) of various combinations of added RE alloys are shown in Table 2. The unmodified alloy 1 had the lowest values for UTS (190.5 ± 2 MPa) and YS (95.5 ± 4 MPa). The addition of CeLa improves the tensile properties of alloy 2. The addition of GdY increases the tensile strength of alloy 3 but reduces its elongation. The alloy 4 containing CeLa and GdY exhibits superior performance, increasing UTS by 36.9% compared to the alloy without RE and increasing EL by 17.8% compared to the alloy only containing GdY.
Figure 10 shows the SEM image of the fracture of the heat-treated tensile specimen. Numerous irregular cleavage planes and holes are distributed at the fracture of the unalloyed RE alloy, as shown in Figure 10a, indicating that the fracture mode of the alloys is mainly brittle fracture. When unmodified, coarse phases in alloy 1 are clearly distributed on the fracture surface, and some cracks appear on the phase surface. These coarse phases act as a source of cracking and greatly reduce the mechanical properties of the alloy. Furthermore, crack initiation and extension predominantly occur along the interface between the coarse phase and the aluminum base. The adjacent cracks are interconnected, leading to material fracture. Figure 10b illustrates a reduction in the quantity of cleavage planes and tearing ridges and an increase in the quantity of dimples in alloy 2, due to the addition of 0.2 wt.% CeLa. When 0.1 wt% GdY is added, the number of dimples in alloy 3 decreases and their depth becomes shallower, as illustrated in Figure 10c. Figure 10d shows that the combined addition of CeLa and GdY leads to an increase in the number of large tough nests and the presence of particles with cracks at the bottom of the tough nests, which are mainly composed of AlCuMnRE. The fracture mode of alloy 4 is a combination of brittle fracture and ductile fracture.

4. Discussion

Based on the results presented, the addition of RE can refine the grain, increase the number of intermetallic compounds, and form new RE-rich phases; at the same time, it can change the size and number of the main hardening phase θ′ phase and improve the mechanical properties of the alloys. More specifically, the combined addition of CeLa and GdY provides a better grain refinement effect than the separate addition of CeLa or GdY. The larger radius of Ce (182 pm) and La (187 pm) atoms, compared to Al (118 pm) atoms, leads to greater lattice distortions as Ce and La atoms enter the α(Al) phase, increasing the energy of the whole system. Therefore, CeLa is not effectively dissolved in the α phase but is enriched at grain boundaries, leading to an increase in the concentration gradient at the interfacial front, resulting in compositional supercooling and an increase in nucleation rate. As shown in Formula 1 [40], the critical nucleation radius r* can be reduced by increasing the undercooling required for nucleation ΔT.
r * = 2 γ Δ S 1 Δ T
where γ is the crystal-melt interfacial free energy and ΔS is the melting entropy. Meanwhile, the limited solubility of GdY in the α-phase leads to the aggregation of GdY around the α-phase, which results in a lower liquid-solid surface tension and an increased nucleation rate during solidification. At the same time, GdY is prone to generating intermetallic compounds with other elements that are biased on the grain boundaries, leading to an increase in compositional supercooling near the solid-liquid interface. As a consequence, the above factors work together to further improve grain refinement.
The combined addition of CeLa and GdY resulted in a significant increase in the number of intermetallic compounds in alloy 4 and the formation of a new RE-rich phase. This is due to the limited solubility of GdY in the aluminum matrix, which causes them to solidify at the solid-liquid interface and prevents the diffusion of the alloying elements (Cu and Mn) [22,41]. Simultaneously, RE and alloying elements form AlCuMnRE and AlCuRE phases along the grain boundaries, which interconnect to form a network, and the alloying elements are consumed in large quantities, leading to a reduction in the volume of the Al2Cu phase and a change in the microstructure of the alloy.
The combined addition of CeLaGdY resulted in a smaller size and a higher amount of the θ′ phase in the alloy. When CeLa atoms enter the Al matrix, they induce severe lattice distortions, thus increasing system energy. To sustain a low-energy system, more oversaturated vacancies may aggregate around CeLa atoms. Because of their high binding energy for vacancies, CeLa atoms are much easier to migrate and provide the nucleation sites for the formation of the θ′ phase [29]. This leads to an increase in the θ′ phase density. Meanwhile, the addition of GdY reduces the precipitation temperature of the θ′ phase (Figure 5b), enhances its nucleation density, and simultaneously lowers the diffusion rate of the alloying element Cu, leading to a delayed coarsening of the θ′ phase [42].
After heat treatment, a part of the RE dissolves into the Al matrix, filling defects and fully diffusing, eliminating casting defects such as shrinkage holes and microscopic segregation in the alloy, thus improving the mechanical properties of the alloy [43]. The micropores are filled with diffused solute atoms and bonded together. This results in a higher relative density of the alloy and a propensity for the secondary phase to be closely distributed with the matrix grains. Under external stress, the matrix separates from the secondary phase, leading to plastic deformation and the formation of tough nests. When CeLa is added alone, the alloy grain size decreases, and the refined grains with more boundaries hinder crack extension. The grain refinement and strengthening improve the mechanical properties of the alloy [44]. When GdY is added alone, the reticulated AlCuMnGdY phases formed along the grain boundaries in the alloy pin the grain boundaries and form high-density dislocation zones that hinder dislocation movement. Dispersion strengthening enhances the alloy’s strength. Nonetheless, intermetallic compounds will damage the continuity of grain boundaries, and as brittle phases, intermetallic compounds will break when subjected to external forces, thereby reducing the elongation of the alloy [23,45]. The combined addition of CeLa + GdY leads to enhanced grain refinement strengthening and dispersion strengthening, significantly increasing the strength of the alloys while improving their plasticity. Simultaneously, the addition of RE improves the nucleation density of the θ′ phase and retards the coarsening of the θ′ phase. A large amount of finely diffused θ′ phases precipitated from the Al matrix after heat treatment, and the precipitation strengthening effect further improved the mechanical properties of the alloy. For these reasons, the fracture mode of the alloy is altered from brittle fracture partially to ductile fracture.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, the effect of the combined addition of CeLa and GdY on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the Al-4Cu-1Mn casting alloy was investigated. Based on the obtained experimental results, the conclusions are as follows:
  • The incorporation of 0.2 wt.% CeLa + 0.1 wt.% GdY into the alloy results in sufficient refinement of the α-Al grains, which change from dendrites to equiaxed crystals. The volume of the Al2Cu phase diminishes while the amount of the RE-containing phase increases. The average grain size and SADS of α-Al reduce from 1135 µm and 103.75 µm to 372 µm and 42.8 µm, respectively.
  • After the combined addition of 0.2 wt% CeLa + 0.1 wt% GdY, the alloy exhibits a bright white AlCuRE phase and a grey AlCuMnRE phase. The secondary phases are closely connected to the matrix grains. The inclusion of RE decreases the precipitation temperature of the θ′ phase, leading the matrix to precipitate numerous finely dispersed θ′ phases. The alloy has excellent overall mechanical properties. The average UTS, YS, and EL of the alloy were measured to be 260.9 MPa, 243.7 MPa, and 1.52%, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.X.; Formal analysis, D.X.; Investigation, H.Z., M.W., Z.L. and D.X.; Resources, D.X. and W.L.; Writing—original draft, H.Z.; Writing—review & editing, D.X., Y.H. and L.H.; Project administration, D.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Pre-research Fund (No. 6142912180105).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Michi, R.A.; Sisco, K.; Bahl, S.; Yang, Y.; Poplawsky, J.D.; Allard, L.F.; Dehoff, R.R.; Plotkowski, A.; Shyam, A. A creep-resistant additively manufactured Al-Ce-Ni-Mn alloy. Acta Mater. 2022, 227, 117699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dar, S.M.; Liao, H.; Xu, A. Effect of Cu and Mn content on solidification microstructure, T-phase formation and mechanical property of Al Cu Mn alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 774, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ren, K.; Wang, G.; Wang, W.; Hu, Y.; Wang, H.; Rong, Y. The Influence of Casting Microvoids on the Constitutive Behavior of As-Quenched Al-Cu-Mn Alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2019, 28, 6638–6648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, F.; Shi, D.; He, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, L.; Zhan, Z.; Yuan, Z. Precipitated phase characteristics and fracture behaviour of cast Al–Cu–Mn alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 25, 2815–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, J.; Yang, Z.; Ma, Z.; Duan, H.; Zhang, J.; Tao, D.; Li, J. Effect of the addition of cerium on the microstructure evolution and thermal expansion properties of cast Al-Cu-Fe alloy. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 036503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tian, W.; Hu, M.; Chen, X.; Zhou, H.; Sun, Y.; Lu, Q.; Wan, M. Effect of Ce addition on microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of Al-Cu-Mn-Mg-Fe alloy. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 036532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, X.; Dai, H.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhao, J.; Li, C.; Liu, W. Improved Recrystallization Resistance of Al–Cu–Li–Zr Alloy through Ce Addition. Metals 2018, 8, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yao, D.; Qiu, F.; Jiang, Q.; Li, Y.; Arnberg, L. Effect of Lanthanum on Grain Refinement of Casting Aluminum-Copper Alloy. Int. J. Met. 2013, 7, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahmoud, M.G.; Samuel, A.M.; Doty, H.W.; Samuel, F.H. Effect of the Addition of La and Ce on the Solidification Behavior of Al–Cu and Al–Si–Cu Cast Alloys. Int. J. Met. 2019, 14, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yao, D.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, H.; Qiu, F.; Jiang, Q. High creep resistance behavior of the casting Al–Cu alloy modified by La. Scr. Mater. 2009, 61, 1153–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ravandi, S.; Mardare, C.C.; Zenger, T.; Eibelhuber, M.; Hassel, A.W.; Mardare, A.I. Samarium influence on current induced atomic displacement in Aluminium and Copper combinatorial thin film alloys. Thin Solid Films 2020, 702, 137949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Xu, H.; Hu, M.; Ji, Z. First-principles study on stability, electronic, mechanical and thermodynamic properties of Al-Cu-RE ternary compounds. Solid State Commun. 2019, 287, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, W.-L.; Xiao, D.-H.; Li, T.; Du, J.-D.; Ding, D.-Y. Microstructure and mechanical properties of two-stage aged Al–Cu–Mg–Ag–Sm alloy. Rare Met. 2018, 38, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Wang, B.; Xue, C.; Liu, X. Quantifying the effects of Sc and Ag on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Cu alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2022, 831, 142355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dorin, T.; Ramajayam, M.; Lamb, J.; Langan, T. Effect of Sc and Zr additions on the microstructure/strength of Al-Cu binary alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 707, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Amer, S.; Barkov, R.; Pozdniakov, A. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Novel Quasibinary Al-Cu-Yb and Al-Cu-Gd Alloys. Metals 2021, 11, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, L.G.; Dong, H.Q.; Huang, G.X.; Shan, J.; Liu, L.B.; Jin, Z.P. Thermodynamic assessment of the Al–Cu–Gd system. Calphad 2009, 33, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Fan, T. Three-Dimensional Network Structure and Mechanical Properties of Al-Cu-Ni-Fe Cast Alloys with Gd Micro-addition. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2021, 52, 2613–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xie, H.; Zhao, J.; Cao, J.; Luo, L.; Guo, S.; Ou, L.; Liu, Z.; Bai, S. Effect of Minor Er Additions on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Cast Al-Cu-Mg-Ag Alloys. Materials 2021, 14, 4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Amer, S.; Yakovtseva, O.; Loginova, I.; Medvedeva, S.; Prosviryakov, A.; Bazlov, A.; Barkov, R.; Pozdniakov, A. The Phase Composition and Mechanical Properties of the Novel Precipitation-Strengthening Al-Cu-Er-Mn-Zr Alloy. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bai, S.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Hou, Y.; Chen, X. Microstructures and fatigue fracture behavior of an Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy with addition of rare earth Er. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010, 527, 1806–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fan, L.; Hao, Q.-T.; Han, W.-K. Dual characteristic of trace rare earth elements in a commercial casting Al–Cu–X alloy. Rare Metals 2014, 34, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Czerwinski, F. Cerium in aluminum alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 24–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, F.; Guo, T.-B.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Ding, W.-W.; Li, Q.-L. Effects of minor Y, Zr and Er addition on microstructure and properties of Al-5Cu-0.4Mn alloy. China Foundry 2017, 14, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, Z.; Chen, P.; Li, S. Effect of Ce addition on microstructure of Al20Cu2Mn3 twin phase in an Al–Cu–Mn casting alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 532, 606–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xinxiang, Y.; Dengfeng, Y.; Zhiming, Y. Effects of Cerium and Zirconium Microalloying Addition on the Microstructures and Tensile Properties of Novel Al-Cu-Li Alloys. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2016, 45, 1917–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guo, T.-B.; Zhang, F.; Ding, W.-W.; Jia, Z. Effect of Micro-scale Y Addition on the Fracture Properties of Al–Cu–Mn Alloy. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2018, 31, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiao, D.H.; Wang, J.N.; Ding, D.Y. Effect of minor cerium additions on microstructure and mechanical properties of cast Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2013, 20, 1237–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Z.; Chen, P.; Ma, C. Microstructures and mechanical properties of Al-Cu-Mn alloy with La and Sm addition. Rare Met. 2012, 31, 332–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mamzurina, O.I.; Amer, S.M.; Glavatskikh, M.V.; Barkov, R.Y.; Loginova, I.S.; Pozdniakov, A.V. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Novel Heat Resistant Cast Al-Cu-Yb(Gd)-Mg-Mn-Zr Alloys. Metals 2022, 12, 2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, B.; Zhan, Y.; Tang, H. High-temperature properties and microstructural evolution of Al–Cu–Mn-RE (La/Ce) alloy designed through thermodynamic calculation. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 758, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zeng, H.X.; Yu, H.Y.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, J.S.; Liao, X.F.; Liu, Z.W. Clarifying the effects of La and Ce in the grain boundary diffusion sources on sintered NdFeB magnets. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 106105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shuai, L.; Zou, X.; Rao, Y.; Lu, X.; Yan, H. Synergistic Effects of La and Y on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cast Al-Si-Cu Alloys. Materials 2022, 15, 7283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, Y.; Yue, C.; Su, M.; Yuan, X.; Zheng, B. Effect of Ce on Hot Tearing Sensitivity of As-Cast Al-Cu-Mg-Y Alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2022, 31, 6349–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bai, Z.; Qiu, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Jiang, Q. Age Hardening and Mechanical Properties of Cast Al Cu Alloy Modified by La and Pr. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2014, 17, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, Z.-X.; Li, Y.-D.; Liu, W.-J.; Yang, H.-K.; Cao, Y.-J.; Bi, G.-L. Effect of La and Sc Co-Addition on the Mechanical Properties and Thermal Conductivity of As-Cast Al-4.8% Cu Alloys. Metals 2021, 11, 1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, T.; Dong, Q.; Fu, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; Sun, B. Effect of addition of La and Ce on solidification behavior of Al-Cu alloys. Mater. Lett. 2022, 324, 132653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, J.; Ding, D.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Z.; Gao, Y.; Chen, G.; Chen, W.; You, X.; Chen, R.; Huang, Y.; et al. CeLa enhanced corrosion resistance of Al-Cu-Mn-Mg-Fe alloy for lithium battery shell. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 422, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barrino, F.; De La Rosa-Ramírez, H.; Schiraldi, C.; López-Martínez, J.; Samper, M.D. Preparation and Characterization of New Bioplastics Based on Polybutylene Succinate (PBS). Polymers 2023, 15, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dong, Q.; Zhang, J.; Dong, J.; Xie, H.; Li, Z.; Dai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, B. In situ observation of columnar-to-equiaxed transition in directional solidification using synchrotron X-radiation imaging technique. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 530, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rhamdani, A.R.; Rhamdhani, M.A.; Brooks, G.; Pownceby, M.I.; Nugraha Thaha, Y.; Abbott, T.B.; Grandfield, J.; Hartley, C. The Production of Rare Earth based Magnesium and Aluminium Alloys—A Review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2023, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Song, M.; Xiao, D.; Zhang, F. Effect of Ce on the thermal stability of the Ω phase in an Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy. Rare Met. 2009, 28, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yu, X.; Zhao, Z.; Shi, D.; Dai, H.; Sun, J.; Dong, X. Enhanced High-Temperature Mechanical Properties of Al–Cu–Li Alloy through T1 Coarsening Inhibition and Ce-Containing Intermetallic Refinement. Materials 2019, 12, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Meng, C.; Su, C.; Liu, Z.; Liao, D.; Rong, X.; Li, Y.; Tang, H.; Wang, J. Synergistic Effect of RE (La, Er, Y, Ce) and Al-5Ti-B on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 6111Aluminum Alloy. Metals 2023, 13, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, H.; Li, S.; Zhang, L.; He, J.; Zheng, Q.; Song, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J. The influence of rare earth element lanthanum on the microstructures and properties of as-cast 8176 (Al-0.5Fe) aluminum alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 859, 157804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dimensions of standard tensile specimen of the experimental alloy (Unit: mm).
Figure 1. Dimensions of standard tensile specimen of the experimental alloy (Unit: mm).
Materials 16 07332 g001
Figure 2. Optical macrographs of as-cast Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Figure 2. Optical macrographs of as-cast Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Materials 16 07332 g002
Figure 3. EBSD micrographs of as-cast Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Figure 3. EBSD micrographs of as-cast Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Materials 16 07332 g003
Figure 4. Average grain size (a) and SDAS (b) of the as-cast Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys.
Figure 4. Average grain size (a) and SDAS (b) of the as-cast Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys.
Materials 16 07332 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns (a) and DSC curves (b) of the cast Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys.
Figure 5. XRD patterns (a) and DSC curves (b) of the cast Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys.
Materials 16 07332 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys as cast (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Figure 6. SEM images of Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys as cast (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Materials 16 07332 g006
Figure 7. SEM morphologies and EDS of the heat-treated Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Figure 7. SEM morphologies and EDS of the heat-treated Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Materials 16 07332 g007
Figure 8. TEM images of the heat-treated Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Figure 8. TEM images of the heat-treated Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Materials 16 07332 g008
Figure 9. Age-hardening curves of Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys with different kinds of RE.
Figure 9. Age-hardening curves of Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys with different kinds of RE.
Materials 16 07332 g009
Figure 10. Tensile fracture morphologies of the heat-treated Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Figure 10. Tensile fracture morphologies of the heat-treated Al-4Cu-1Mn alloys (a) Alloy 1, (b) Alloy 2 (0.2 CeLa), (c) Alloy 3 (0.1 GdY), and (d) Alloy 4 (0.2 CeLa + 0.1 GdY).
Materials 16 07332 g010
Table 1. Normal compositions of the experimental alloys (wt.%).
Table 1. Normal compositions of the experimental alloys (wt.%).
AlloysCuMnCeLaGdYAl
Alloy 14.01.0500Balance
Alloy 24.01.050.200Balance
Alloy 34.01.0500.10Balance
Alloy 44.01.050.200.10Balance
Table 2. Results of tensile properties of the heat-treated alloys.
Table 2. Results of tensile properties of the heat-treated alloys.
AlloysUTS (MPa)YS (MPa)EL (%)
Alloy 1190.5 ± 295.4 ± 33.71 ± 0.5
Alloy 2215.8 ± 3104.5 ± 44.27 ± 0.6
Alloy 3240.8 ± 2206.9 ± 31.29 ± 0.3
Alloy 4260.9 ± 4243.7 ± 21.52 ± 0.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Wu, M.; Li, Z.; Xiao, D.; Huang, Y.; Huang, L.; Liu, W. Effect of Combined Addition of CeLa and GdY on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of As-Cast Al-Cu-Mn Alloys. Materials 2023, 16, 7332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237332

AMA Style

Zhang H, Wu M, Li Z, Xiao D, Huang Y, Huang L, Liu W. Effect of Combined Addition of CeLa and GdY on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of As-Cast Al-Cu-Mn Alloys. Materials. 2023; 16(23):7332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Haiyang, Mingdong Wu, Zeyu Li, Daihong Xiao, Yang Huang, Lanping Huang, and Wensheng Liu. 2023. "Effect of Combined Addition of CeLa and GdY on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of As-Cast Al-Cu-Mn Alloys" Materials 16, no. 23: 7332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop